![]() |
|
|
| |
« Indians Release Matt Herges | Main | Odds And Ends: Chapman, Nats, Buehrle »
Roy Halladay spoke with reporters about the possibility of getting traded. Here's some of what he said:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
It'd be funny if Werth got traded along with them.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | July 13, 2009 at 01:06 PM
Well two of the Phillies top prospects are outfielders so it shouldn't be surprising that Werth would want them out of there so he doesn't lose his job.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | July 13, 2009 at 01:10 PM
I agree with Werth...
bye Taylor or Brown (not both), Carrasco, Marson, Knapp (maybe), Mayberry, and Donald.
Any combination of that is cool with me...no Drabek or Happ please...TOR is full of pitching.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | July 13, 2009 at 01:14 PM
I hope Philly trades away their future for '09/'10 just in time for McCann, Heyward, Hanson, Freeman, and Jurrjens to rule the next decade.
A dude can hope right...
Posted by: bbxxj | July 13, 2009 at 01:15 PM
I hope the Phils don't trade Drabek, Happ, or Taylor.
Here's a package I'd trade for Doc:
Brown, Donald, Carrasco/Knapp, Marson
Posted by: SI52 | July 13, 2009 at 01:16 PM
citizen snips,
haha i had thought the same thing a while back and considered a better option for us trading:
Werth, Drabek, Carrasco and Savery.
We lose an all star (lol) but gain an ace.
that way we can plug in Taylor in RF next year although realistically I'd rather do this deal at the end of this year so we don't have to suffer with Mayberry for a long period of time this year.
the only problem with my scenario is that Toronto doesn't need OF's which is admittedly a big problem.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 13, 2009 at 01:17 PM
someone please point out to me where in that article it says Halladay would be willing to play for the Yankees.
Yankee homer Davidoff is clearly trying to get the hopes up of yankee fans
Posted by: Adam | July 13, 2009 at 01:20 PM
its clearly going to be around cararsco or drabek/ donald, marson possibly/ Taylor or brown and from the bunch of Worley, Savery, Carpenter.
Posted by: derman1984 | July 13, 2009 at 01:21 PM
If I'm Ricciardi it's no Drabek, no deal. He has to be the centerpiece in a Philly deal.
Posted by: deeselig | July 13, 2009 at 01:22 PM
"If I'm Ricciardi it's no Drabek, no deal. He has to be the centerpiece in a Philly deal."
If I'm JP, I'm not making an ultimatum, since the A's got a pretty good package for Haren and the DBacks didn't give up Scherzer, but I think JP HAS to get two of the Drabek/Brown/Taylor/Carrasco crop to even start a deal.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 13, 2009 at 01:24 PM
If I'm Ricciardi it's no Drabek, no deal. He has to be the centerpiece in a Philly deal.
Posted by: deeselig | July 13, 2009 at 01:22 PM
I know it was only one inning but he looked pretty polished yesterday didn't he against some pretty solid hitters after having to wait out a 4 hr rain delay.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 13, 2009 at 01:25 PM
melonis, JP loves pitching. I'd be VERY surprised if a deal with Philly was made and at least one of Drabek or Knapp didn't come to Toronto.
Posted by: 92-93 | July 13, 2009 at 01:26 PM
Rube won't give up Drabek, guaranteed. He and Hammels are the future no. 1 and 2 pitchers...only way they give up Drabek is if Halladay agrees to a reasonable 3 years extension...and that's still a maybe.
Toronto wants Donald and could use Marson. They have a lot of depth in the OF with Snider leading the pack, but next year an outfield with Snider and Dom. Brown or Taylor looks pretty good for them. They could also want Knapp who throws 98+ and is said to look like a ML Closer.
Rumor says Happ is a possibility, but I doubt it. They want to add to their rotation, not take from it.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | July 13, 2009 at 01:28 PM
**Hamels -- I hate when people spell his name wrong and I did it...damnit.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | July 13, 2009 at 01:29 PM
I'm not at all sold on Carrasco as the pitcher coming back. My impression is that he's muddling along right now & Knapp is too far away to sell to fans in Toronto.
Posted by: deeselig | July 13, 2009 at 01:32 PM
Drabek is in any Halladay deal. No doubt. Some of you guys act like the Phillies are the only team allowed to try to deal for Halladay. My guess would be Drabek, Taylor/Brown, Carrasco and Donald. This is the best pitcher in baseball and the Jays have leverage. If the Phillies won't trade Drabek, then they are going to have to go crazy with quantity. I don't see it getting done without him. Other teams will get into the bidding if the Phillies are offering a weakish package.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 13, 2009 at 01:35 PM
I think a fair deal will be something similar to this:
Drabek, Taylor/Brown, Donald, Happ/Carrasco
perhaps one more filler type
I know a lot of Philly fans want Halladay without giving up Drabek or Brown or taylor but its going to have to happen in my opinion..
We have to remember that Halladay is arguably the best pitcher in the world right now and whoever gets him has him for all of next season as well and at a very reasonable price..
for these reasons, im shocked there arent more teams after him
Posted by: Adam | July 13, 2009 at 01:35 PM
Courtesy of Keith Law.
• Kyle Drabek, RHP, Philadelphia.
Drabek, son of former major leaguer Doug Drabek, was 91-93 with a hard curveball at 79-80 that had a slider-esque horizontal break. His delivery is still rough, with some head violence at the end, and he commanded his fastball to his glove side but less so to his arm side. Drabek's name has come up as the potential anchor of a stretch-drive trade for the Phillies, but he's not that kind of impact talent -- just a very good pitching prospect with a chance for two above-average pitches.
Posted by: 92-93 | July 13, 2009 at 01:40 PM
"If I'm JP, I'm not making an ultimatum, since the A's got a pretty good package for Haren and the DBacks didn't give up Scherzer, but I think JP HAS to get two of the Drabek/Brown/Taylor/Carrasco crop to even start a deal."
Absolutely agree.
If the deal is starting off with some combination of those two, along with some combination of Donald/Marson/Savery/Collier, then the talks could go somewhere.
I still think that the Jays should be pretty happy if they can land Brown, Drabek, Donald and Marson. I think that they should really get Brown or Drabek in any deal.
Although I think that people really need to remember that Drabek is still just a 21-year-old coming off of Tommy John surgery posting a 3.31 FIP in AA.
Drabek is a great prospect, but he's not some sure-fire stud.
As long as the Phils come away from the deal with Knapp and one of Brown/Taylor/Drabek, then they should be pretty happy.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 13, 2009 at 01:46 PM
"for these reasons, im shocked there arent more teams after him"
Well realistically there maybe 12 teams that can possibly put together a package for Halladay and take on his salary. Some of them it would be too risky because it would wipe out their farms and realistically tie up too much money to really allow the team to compete. Others, well frankly need to address other needs. So I'd say realistically only 6 teams that could be serious contenders and the yanks Red Sox are 2 of them and most are counting them out.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 13, 2009 at 01:57 PM
I know they've said Drabek is off-limits, but at least from a fan perspective I'd be ok with him going.
Of the 4 mentioned (Drabek/Carrasco/Brown/Taylor) I'd most like it to be Brown/Carrasco, but if it's Taylor/Drabek that's just fine.
For those that haven't looked at him, Taylor is a BEAST. Currently .335/.411/.982 15-HR 21-2B 4-3B 17SB 35BB/51K at AA. Keith Law mentioned him as one of his top "could jump into the top-10 prospects" guys pre-season...Dominic Brown was mentioned as one as well.
Posted by: Muggi | July 13, 2009 at 02:07 PM
It's a shame that Carrasco and Donald didn't tear it up as much as the Phils were hoping cuz that would have made this trade a lot easier...
too bad the Giants are playing soo well or else Cain might have hit the market...doubtful, but maybe.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | July 13, 2009 at 02:18 PM
Well if he doesn't have a list of teams that's he'd refuse to go to then I'd like to see Texas get in on the sweepstakes. I think their prospects match up the best for Toronto. They've got money coming off the books soon, so they should be able to afford him for at least a year and a half
Posted by: Jim T | July 13, 2009 at 02:20 PM
"If I'm Ricciardi it's no Drabek, no deal. He has to be the centerpiece in a Philly deal."
If I'm JP, I'm not making an ultimatum, since the A's got a pretty good package for Haren and the DBacks didn't give up Scherzer, but I think JP HAS to get two of the Drabek/Brown/Taylor/Carrasco crop to even start a deal.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 13, 2009 at 01:24 PM
While the deal for Haren would be a STARTING POINT for the deal for Halladay. If a team is looking to acquire elite pitching talent in the form of the best pitcher in baseball not only this season but consistently, then the team trading for him is going to have to give up top level talent. There are no untouchables or there is no deal.
Posted by: hypperboy | July 13, 2009 at 02:28 PM
Its worth repeating that Joel Sherman wrote:
"Ricciardi said that Halladay has provided a long list of places he would not be willing to play, but the Toronto GM would not say if either New York club was on that list."
http://blogs.nypost.com/sports/st/archives/2009/07/ricciardi_on_ha.html
There is obviously a disconnect here, but what Halladay is alleged to have said suits him from a diplomatic point of view. What Ricciardi has said suits the club's negotiating stance. With these conflicting sources, I think its fair to say that MLBTR cannot now conclude that Halladay has given no list of teams acceptable to him. Nor can we conclusively say he has. I do, however, find it extremely hard to believe that Ricciardi would lie to Sherman or that Sherman would misrepresent what was said to him.
Posted by: Steve in MA | July 13, 2009 at 02:28 PM
"While the deal for Haren would be a STARTING POINT for the deal for Halladay."
You do realize that the A's ended up with an elite LH starting prospect, two top OF prospects, a top power-hitting 1B prospect, and two young BOR starters under control for years, right?
That was an absolutely monster haul for Haren, and the Blue Jays should be happy if they can come away with as much as the A's did from the Haren deal.
I'm sure that the Jays would love to get a Brett Anderson-level pitching prospect.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 13, 2009 at 02:33 PM
You do realize that the A's ended up with an elite LH starting prospect, two top OF prospects, a top power-hitting 1B prospect, and two young BOR starters under control for years, right?
That was an absolutely monster haul for Haren, and the Blue Jays should be happy if they can come away with as much as the A's did from the Haren deal.
I'm sure that the Jays would love to get a Brett Anderson-level pitching prospect.
Remember when the trade was made, while it was still a good haul for the A's the prospects were not as highly regarded then as they are now. I'm just saying that Roy Halladay has proved himself and that the Jays would require as many sure-fire prospects as they can get.
Posted by: hypperboy | July 13, 2009 at 02:39 PM
They should not want quantity they should ask for quality alone.
Halladay for Taylor, Drabek, Happ and Gose.
I know you will think is too much, but I think it should be about this much for a haul.
They would like a Joba Chamberlain and Phil Hughes plus package, so with the phillies it is very similar.
Posted by: theJonathan | July 13, 2009 at 02:43 PM
"Remember when the trade was made, while it was still a good haul for the A's the prospects were not as highly regarded then as they are now. I'm just saying that Roy Halladay has proved himself and that the Jays would require as many sure-fire prospects as they can get."
You're definitely right here.
Brett Anderson was nowhere near the pitching prospect he was at the end of the '08 season that he was when he was traded. He was a top 100 prospect, but definitely not a top 20.
But then, Carlos Gonzalez's stock dropped quite a bit between when the A's got him and when the A's flipped him in the Holliday deal.
And, nobody expected Eveland and Smith to put up the (fluke?) seasons in '08.
So I would say the investment known as the Haren package has increased in value since the A's got it. So Halladay should net a bit more, although not MUCH more because although Halladay is the better pitcher, he's controlled for 1.5 years less than Haren was when the A's traded him.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 13, 2009 at 02:45 PM
Courtesy of Keith Law.
• Kyle Drabek, RHP, Philadelphia.
Drabek, son of former major leaguer Doug Drabek, was 91-93 with a hard curveball at 79-80 that had a slider-esque horizontal break. His delivery is still rough, with some head violence at the end, and he commanded his fastball to his glove side but less so to his arm side. Drabek's name has come up as the potential anchor of a stretch-drive trade for the Phillies, but he's not that kind of impact talent -- just a very good pitching prospect with a chance for two above-average pitches.
Posted by: 92-93 | July 13, 2009 at 01:40 PM
klaw is for whatever reason never really enamored with much the Phillies have and do so that doesn't worry me much. He like many bashed the Ibanez deal and now look at it. I take what he says in regards to us with a grain of salt.
oh and for all his mechanical complaints about Drabek he did have a 10 pitch, one strikeout no hit inning, but i'm not going to take one inning either and make him a star. I think he'd be a solid #2 pitcher once he gets there and IF he didn't lose a year+ to TJ surgery he'd probably be considered for a callup this year.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 13, 2009 at 02:47 PM
oh and for all his mechanical complaints about Drabek he did have a 10 pitch, one strikeout no hit inning, but i'm not going to take one inning either and make him a star. I think he'd be a solid #2 pitcher once he gets there and IF he didn't lose a year+ to TJ surgery he'd probably be considered for a callup this year.
You would have to believe the Jays would be pretty worried about acquiring a pitcher that had TJ surgery considering....McGowan, Litsch, Marcum, BJ....ai ai ai!
Posted by: hypperboy | July 13, 2009 at 02:52 PM
hypperboy,
haha ya exactly but Kyle does have a strong track record since his TJ surgery. (Hawaii winter ball, HIgh A and now a strong couple months in AA) Wherever he ends up, I'd be surprised (WITHOUT FURTHER INJURY) if he doesn't peak to at least a #2 starter and for that I don't know that you give all that some people are asking for (ie Brown and Taylor and Happ etc.) I don't want to destroy our future for a year and a half.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 13, 2009 at 03:07 PM
So assume Brown, Donald and Carrasco are givens.
What else would get it done?
Would Savery? Savery+Marson? Savery+Knapp? Marson+Knapp? Knapp? Or would one of Drabek or Happ have to be in the deal?
I think it can be done keeping Drabek and Happ if you give up some combo of the above players/
They'd get a top OF prospect in Brown, a top IF prospect in Donald, 2 or 3 top starting pitching prospects in Carrasco and one of Knapp/Savery(they can have both Knapp and Savery if that's what it takes). Maybe a reliever like an Escalona or a catcher like a D'Arnaud or Marson. Some conbo of Brown/Carrasco/Donald plus 2 of Knapp/Savery/Marson/Escalona.
That's a pretty good haul. You look at what teams got for Sabathia, Santana, Beckett, Schilling, Martinez, it's well in line. The Haren deal was a monster but that's an outlier.
Posted by: rufus peckham | July 13, 2009 at 03:19 PM
"So I would say the investment known as the Haren package has increased in value since the A's got it. So Halladay should net a bit more, although not MUCH more because although Halladay is the better pitcher, he's controlled for 1.5 years less than Haren was when the A's traded him."
But you can also keep in mind that Haren has surpassed expectations since joining Arizona as well.
His FIP's while pitching in an extreme pitchers park in Oakland: 3.89, 4.12, 3.70
Those are not the numbers of an ace.
Then he goes to Arizona and posts a 3.01 FIP in 2008, and he's improved this season, posting a 2.70 FIP, becoming one of the very best pitchers in the game.
The value of the Haren package may have increased, but at the same time Haren wasn't nearly as good before the trade.
"So assume Brown, Donald and Carrasco are givens.
What else would get it done?
Would Savery? Savery+Marson? Savery+Knapp? Marson+Knapp? Knapp? Or would one of Drabek or Happ have to be in the deal?"
If the Phillies can land Brown, Carrasco, Knapp and Donald for Halladay, that's a no brainer for Toronto, in my opinion.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 13, 2009 at 03:36 PM
"If the Phillies can land Brown, Carrasco, Knapp and Donald for Halladay, that's a no brainer for Toronto, in my opinion."
Wow, that's far from a no-brainer. Donald is having an abysmal year and scouts question his defense - he doesn't necessarily project as a MBL regular. Carrasco projects as a #3, and the Phillies have passed up opportunities to give him a chance. Knapp was just drafted, and the Jays passed on him twice (and he was the Phils' 5th pick). Off to a nice start, but a ways away. Marson would join Arencibia and Jeroloman as catching prospects for the Jays that just don't predict to be very good ; he's a filler piece, not an integral component - scouts are very down on his singles, ground-ball hitting bat. Not going to approach Brown, because obviously he's a stud, but I'd be astonished if JP centered a deal around an OF prospect, when he's locked into Rios and Wells through 2014 and Snider is under team control for another 6 years.
Posted by: 92-93 | July 13, 2009 at 04:00 PM
Well, if Amaro can make that deal and doesn't he should be fired on the spot.
I'd throw in Savery or Marson just to make sure they don't get cold feet.
Posted by: rufus peckham | July 13, 2009 at 04:04 PM
92-93,
agreed that that in itself isn't enough although I would say I'd personally rather you have Drabek than Knapp because Knapp's stuff is better. I've seen him 3 times live and he regularly sits at 96 with good movement in the later innings of games. If not for a couple of bad starts (not uncommon for an 18 year old) he'd have stats that approach Cole Hamels when he was in our system.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 13, 2009 at 04:21 PM
Me personally, I'd prefer that Marson, Happ and Drabek be left alone.
Anybody else in the minors is fair game. I wouldn't miss Feliz, either.
Posted by: Red | July 13, 2009 at 04:53 PM
For me Drabek, Happ, or Knapp can not be part of any deal. We are going to need all the pitching that we can get and giving away our best pitching prospects does not help that even with adding Halladay. Start with either Brown or Taylor and Donald and let them choose any other 3 prospects they want besides those guys. A package of something like Brown, Donald, Marson, Carrasco, and Savery is a pretty nice package. In my mind Toronto is getting the better end of that deal as it is and anything more is highway robbery.
Posted by: CasperX22 | July 13, 2009 at 08:10 PM
Drabek, Carrasco, Donald, Marson, and Werth for Halladay and League.
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 13, 2009 at 08:42 PM
First of all, there is no possible way that any deal for Halladay won't START with two pieces... Drabek and Donald... From there, you can speculate... But the Phils best pitching prospect and a decent SS prospect are a must in a deal for Halladay...
Second, i'm a Phillies fan, but will everyone stop with the Happ overrating... He will never be the centerpiece of a big deal... He has always had a decent k/9 in the minors but it has seriously gone down since he hit the show... Also, his bb/9 has risen... His luck will run out and the Jays know it...
I love Happ as much as anyone, but his projections aren't great... He is a back of the rotation guy... He wreaks of Kyle Kendrick...
Posted by: allabouthephils | July 14, 2009 at 04:18 AM
Very Nice post allaboutthephils,
Would you do Brown,Drabek,Knapp and Donald for Halladay?
Posted by: theJonathan | July 14, 2009 at 08:47 AM