MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Trade Market: Second Basemen | Main | Angels Yet To Call On Aroldis Chapman »

Offseason Outlook: Atlanta Braves

Next up in our Offseason Outlook series, the Braves.  Their likely commitments for 2010:

C - Brian McCann - $5.5MM
C - Dave Ross - $1.6MM
1B -
2B - Martin Prado - $415K
SS - Yunel Escobar - $425K
3B - Chipper Jones - $13MM
IF - Kelly Johnson - $2.825MM+
IF - Diory Hernandez - $400K
IF/OF - Omar Infante - $2.225MM
LF - Matt Diaz - $1.2375MM+
CF - Nate McLouth - $4.5MM
RF - Ryan Church - $2.8MM+
OF - Jordan Schafer - $400K

SP - Javier Vazquez - $11.5MM
SP - Jair Jurrjens - $450K
SP - Tommy Hanson - $400K
SP - Tim Hudson - $9MM (est.)
SP - Derek Lowe - $15MM

RP - Peter Moylan - $410K+
RP - Kenshin Kawakami - $6.667MM
RP - Kris Medlen - $400K
RP - Eric O'Flaherty - $400K
RP - Boone Logan - $428K+
RP - Manny Acosta - $413K
RP - James Parr - $400K

The Braves have about $81MM committed before arbitration raises to Johnson, Diaz, Church, Moylan, and Logan.  Johnson and Logan are potential trade/non-tender candidates.  Regardless, the Braves should fall under $90MM (and that includes an estimated $9MM for Hudson).  According to Cot's Baseball Contracts, the Braves began 2009 with a $96.7MM payroll.  Ultimately I can see Braves GM Frank Wren having close to $15MM to spend without raising payroll.

First base and left field are two positions Wren must address this winter.  The Braves intend to add a right-handed power bat; we ran through options here.  At the time, I didn't realize Jason Bay and Matt Holliday might be considerations.  The plan for first base might be to re-sign Adam LaRoche, though there are respectable free agent alternatives.

Wren will probably sign a reliever, as closers Rafael Soriano and Mike Gonzalez are up for free agency.  Both project as Type A free agents; will the Braves offer arbitration?  If either player accepts, the Braves can offer any salary they want and have that figure pitted against the submission from the player's agent.  Still, Soriano earning $6.1MM this year against $3.45MM for Gonzalez might lead to an arbitration offer only for the latter.  The argument against Moylan closing is that lefties handle him well.  Pairing him with O'Flaherty in the ninth has potential if the Braves want to save money in the bullpen.  And don't forget that Medlen had 53 strikeouts in 49.3 relief innings this year.

So the Braves have needs at first base, left field, and possibly the bullpen.  Considering the inflated price of free agent power hitters, how can Wren fill all these holes on a $12-15MM budget?  The Braves' pitching surplus could be the answer.  Kawakami's contract isn't unreasonable.  Lowe's is, given his declining peripherals.  Lowe is still useful, though, so the Braves could still trade him and shed 2010 payroll even if they can't find a taker for all $15MM. 

My suggestion: retain the starting pitching depth.  In all likelihood Kawakami will still be needed for 20+ starts next year.  The Braves could instead bump payroll to $100MM, dump Johnson and Logan, go cheap on the bullpen, perhaps backload Hudson's deal, and spend $9-10MM each for the first base and left field spots.  Perhaps Johnson could even be used to acquire a decent late-inning reliever.


Comments

I wonder if they'd consider using Kawakami as a closer. He got tired towards the end of the season and the odds of getting something for Lowe are at best minuscule. This would let them use the money saved on signing a CL to get some power in the lineup.

"Lowe's is, given his declining peripherals."

People always say things like this. There's zero empirical evidence that it's true. None of his peripherals have declined for a sustained period of time, just 1 year. There's no evidence it's not just an aberration and there's actually no real decline in his skills.

It remains to be seen what is the truth, but only Nostradamus is capable of properly speaking in absolutes with regards to his relative fundamental abilities or the possible decline thereof.

It doesn't even matter what Lowe actually does in 2010. Right now it just matters what teams think of him. And I bet they think his contract is a burden and are worried about the turn his numbers took in 2009.

Lowe is in decline. If Wren can get rid of his contract he'll put his name up there with the elite GMs in the game. You can't blame him for signing him. We were absolutely desperate for starters after losing out on Peavy and Burnett. We went into panic mode. I remember when they were meeting at Turner Field, I said that we better get him sign. In hindsight it was dumb. Get rid of him Frank and get us a bat please.

I think you're selling the Front Offices short, Tim. They probably have a much better idea as to how valuable a player actually is than we do. Most of them, anyway.

"Lowe is in decline."

Again, zero evidence this is true.

It's one thing to say Lowe's 2009 sample isn't as big as you'd like. It's another to say it's meaningless, which is what you are implying. I don't agree.

If Wren finds a team that takes all $45 mil, I'll be impressed and you will have been right. I would be OK with that. I was wrong on a Braves pitcher valuation very recently, I didn't think Hudson could top 1/12 and he almost certainly will without even hitting the open market.

Would a contract swap between Cincinnati and Atlanta based on Cordero and Lowe work? What other pieces would need to be thrown in?

"Right now it just matters what teams think of him."

That's a good point, Tim - and the most important one in the end. I do think Lowe will rebound, but based on his 2009 performance - and I'm just basing this on having watched the majority of the Braves' games - I STRONGLY doubt that anyone will be willing to pick up Lowe and his whole salary. Even for a Rios-style dump deal.

Initially, I thought trading Vasquez was a good way to pick up a bat....not so sure now....

For $15 mil, I don't see why the Braves couldn't re-sign LaRoche + closer. If a power bat needs to come into the picture, then maybe trade one of the pitchers. Also, I do think Heyward will be in the OF in Atlanta by June.

Dierkes said "In all likelihood Kawakami will still be needed for 20+ starts next year."

I'm wondering how he knows this is the case. Why will the braves need a 6th starter for 20+ starts? thats like one pitcher missing most of a full season, two pitchers missing over half the season, or three pitchers missing a month and a half each.

Now I know that health is never guaranteed, even for two pitchers under 25 and two other who have never been on the DL in their careers, but what does Dierkes know that makes it "likely" Kawakami will be needed for 20+ starts?

Tim, I like your thinking about keeping the SPs intact, but I disagree with how to spend that $20M you propose (if they raise they payroll to $100M).

The market this year for 1Bs is thin. I mean, the best options are Adam LaRoche, or maybe Hank Blalock...or Carlos Delgado if you think he will come back well. That $10M a year might get you LaRoche or Delgado...maybe slightly less for LaRoche. The problem is, that takes you completely out of the running for a decent OF. At $10M/year, the Braves will be lucky to get an aging, defensively-challenged OF like Jermaine Dye. So, that $20M could get a Dye/LaRoche combo.

OR...considering that Freddie Freeman is probably only a year away from the majors, sign someone like Aubrey Hill to an incentive-laden one-year deal and use the rest of the money to go all in for Bay or Holliday...so that $20M gets you Bay or Holliday and Hill as a stopgap to Freeman.

And KJ? Trade him for a veteran bullpen arm. Someone like George Sherrill of the Dodgers would be nice, but it doesn't necessarily need to be someone with closing experience. Just a veteran bullpen arm to go with all those young guns down there in the Braves pen.

PWH, i wouldnt say there is "zero" evidence lowe is declining. there is 2009. that might not be much evidence or conclusive evidence, but its more than "zero".

of course, if you look more closely at lowe's season, start by start, it seems more likely he had basically two really bad slumps this season, not a full season of bad performances.

I'm not implying it's meaningless, just pointing out that a) 1 data point (2009) isn't sufficient evidence to conclude that a trend exists and b) it's within the realm of possibilities that 2009's peripherals aren't a correct representation of his fundamental skills.

Even so, $15 million for 200+ innings of 4.00 FIP (if 2009's peripherals are, in fact, a correct representation of his fundamental ability) isn't the toughest thing in baseball to move.

I think he stays put, though. He's probably more valuable to the Braves than anyone else.

"Would a contract swap between Cincinnati and Atlanta based on Cordero and Lowe work? What other pieces would need to be thrown in?

Posted by: carolina03 | October 30, 2009 at 12:21 PM
"


No good. Cincinnati doesn't need another starter. The Reds need a SS.

For the person who said "If Wren can get rid of Lowe and his contract he would become an elite GM". This is the same GM who gave him this contract. I think all Braves fans should be happy be happy about the year they had because they will nor repeat this sucres because the Phillies are great the Marlins are good and we all know the Mets are gonna reload and they had major injuries. They are going to be tough next year.

For more on the Lowe situation:

Pitcher 1: '07 224IP 3.54FIP; '08 163IP 4.53FIP; '09 176IP 3.73FIP
32yr old with 3yr averages of 186IP & 3.93FIP demanding ~5yrs/~100M

Pitcher 2: '07 199.1IP 3.97FIP; '08 211IP 3.26FIP; '09 194.2IP 4.06FIP
36yr old with 3yr averages of 201.4IP & 3.76FIP demanding 3yrs/45M

So do you give the younger pitcher (Lackey) a longer deal worth twice as much as the older pitcher (Lowe)? Lowe has been healthier and more consistant than Lackey but could be 'fading' and doesn't have that allure of being an 'ace'. Some here are crazy about getting Lackey but are balking about giving Lowe (who has been healthier with similar or better FIP numbers than Lackey) half as much over less time.

I know Lowe is not Lackey but for the teams that miss out on giving him 100M, Lowe at 45M doens't seem that bad considering the market for solid AND durable starters.

Lowe for Maggs straight up.

And why is there no mention of Jason Heyward? He should be up by next June, and that may supply one of these holes the Braves seemingly have. I know Wren's said they're not counting on him to be the upgrade in offense, but honestly, he's going to start when he comes up, and he's going to be a good player.

I say re-sign LaRoche and try and find another corner outfielder to platoon with Diaz, who is not a bad player whatsoever. If Chipper bounces back from a bad year, these Braves could go all the way with their pitching (oh, and re-sign Gonzalez, but offer arbitration to both).

I really don't think the Braves should trade any of their starting pitchers unless they get wowed by an offer. You never know what could happen with injuries and such so you might as well have as much depth as possible. The Braves are due for a breakout year soon, they have really good pitching and a lot of talent coming up through the minors.

Wren should sign Xavier Nady to play 1B. He is cheap, right handed, and had 30 homers 2 years ago. And I wouldn't be opposed to trading Derek Lowe for Garry Matthews and a prospect. If Matthews plays mediocre baseball, then Heyward could be called up. Would the angels agree to a deal like that????

Look I hear what PWH is saying about 1 year not being enough of a sample, but I'd buy into that a lot more if Lowe was 26 instead of 36. There's a huge difference. Cole Hamels had a down year with some similarities to Lowe's year, and I expect him to bounce back next year. But he's 25, not 35.

Possibly even more concerning with Lowe is the fact that he isn't exactly heading into the last year of a contract. Whatever he does bring, it's yours for 3 more years in his age 37, 38, & 39 seasons. My crystal ball broke this morning, but I'm still banking that those years will not be as pretty as PWH's of the world would like to think.

That being said, with the Braves needing a 1B & LF, I feel like Wren should be touching base w/ Doug Melvin from time to time getting into the winter here. The Brewers are desperately in need of starting pitching, and have plenty of corner types in Hart, Gamel, Lawrie, etc. Not sure the Brewers would consider moving either of those last two, but both of them are solid prospects who are semi-positionless or blocked by current players. I'm not proposing some insane Prince Fielder for Tommy Hanson swap or anything, nor am I even suggesting anything huge here. But the two teams seem to match up in more ways than one, and I think it would just be due diligence on Frank Wren's part to explore that.

If you honestly want GMJ on the Braves, then you need to get your head checked out. There's a reason he's gotten very little playing time the past couple of years, and its because he sucks. Lowe would at least be an effective starter for the Braves, GMJ would be a hole to pour money in to.

Agreed, you should want no part of a Lowe for Matthews trade. Lowe at least has a good chance of bouncing back and gives your pitching staff some leadership and postseason experience.

Lowe is fine, he's expensive but he's durable. Of course he's declining, he's entering his age 35 season. Trading him doesn't make sense for the Braves, there's little they could get in return that would make sense.

Perhaps the Braves could bolster the bullpen by trading Johnson to a team that needs a 2B and has bullpen depth in the minors-- Dodgers maybe?

The market for Lowe will develop once Lackey signs. The teams losing out on him will find themselves with no good starting pitching options. Then Wren makes a few phone calls and suddenly you have several teams interested in Lowe.

I would also trade/release Kelly Johnson and Ryan Church. I would replace them with Brooks Conrad and Gregor Blanco/Brandon Hicks. That would save $5M before arb raises.

Hmm, lots of good posts here.

Thing is, the Bravo's do in fact have a surplus of starting pitchers...and they do in fact need a RH power hitter.

So, how do we handle this? If you think outside the box then you are also aware that, no matter how good Escobar may seem to be, "player friendly" Bobby Cox has yanked him in multiple games due to his lack of...err, lets say tunnel vision.

I want to know who is out there, as a RH, who can play 1b or an outfield position, that is going to 1. fit within the payroll, 2. come from a team that has weaknesses whereas we have strengths, and 3. ...fits into our long range plans.

There are tons of smart people on this site folks, ...I am just waiting on someone to speak up.

Suggestions? The Yanks might not be too happy with Swisher right now. Could Washington be done with Dunn?

"but I'd buy into that a lot more if Lowe was 26 instead of 36"

And that's a fair point, certainly something to consider. But a .75 run decline over a year is outside of the normal aging patterns, even at 36. There are tons of untested variables here. My point is we don't know. To quote Bill James:

Q: Has sabermetrics pretty much squeezed the last drop of new insights out of traditional counting statistics? If so, what data ought to be collected to improve our understanding of the game? If not, where can the boundaries be pushed?

A: We haven’t figured out anything yet. A hundred years from now, we won’t have begun to have the game figured out.

As a pitcher who's ability to induce ground balls determines his effectiveness, looking at the rate of his ability to create worm burners would be a good starting point to determine decline.

Here's what we have regarding that (gb/fb%):

2006: 2.10
2007: 1.89
2008: 1.54
2009: 1.30

That would appear to be a pretty steady decline. Last year, although it contributed to declining statistics, may have been a bit of aberration, given that Lowe's BAPIP was .333, compared to career mark of .295. However, a good deal of that would probably be due to an increased line drive rate:

2007: 15.8
2008: 16.7
2009: 17.9

Bottom line, there is strong evidence that points to decline. Having a below average defensive player at the keystone (both Johnson and Prado are rated as such according to UZR 150) probably isn't going to help his cause, not to mention Jones at third.

Also what is the obsession with GMJ with users on this site? People seem to think he's some sort of undiscovered gem just waiting to break out on a different time.

Guys, he's a HGH using one-season wonder who may be athletic but isn't good enough to start on almost any team. Its one of the worst contracts in baseball, you can easily replace his numbers with OFs in any team's minor league system.

I see the need for I 1st baseman, I think Wren should look at the possibility of obtaining Troy Glaus for the position if he's healthy. He would come for a year or two on the cheap to proove he can still play, and may give us 20hrs and 95+ RBI's till freeman is ready. We should look at J Cantu as another possibility as well in a trade.
Also, I would not discard Lowe like a pair of old socks just yet. He will give us some good innings and has postseason success, which is where we are headed if we keep this unit together for the most part.
We can trim the fat by losing K Johnson and R Church for bullpen or prospects.
We do need a legit deep ball threat in the outfield till Hayward comes around to stay, Maybe Ankiel, Burrell, or Swisher?

A few quick notes on Lowe. I agree with everyone who says you can't ignore that he seemed to "decline" last season, but I still fall more in line with PWHjort on this one. First off is the fact that he wasn't consistently mediocre last year....he was brilliant, then terrible, then brilliant, then terrible. That's not the normal pattern of a pitcher in decline. That the pattern of a sinkerballer who went through a couple of tough stretches where he couldn't quite get his release just right. Also, one of the major selling points Boras used when shopping Lowe last year was how efficent he is with his pitches during a game. While I know Boras will say anything to help his clients, I think he really has a point with Lowe. The near 200 innings he pitches every year likely don't have the same wear and tear as they do on most pitchers, simply because it takes him fewer pitches per out that other pitchers. David O'Brien wrote the exact figures in a blog last offseason, so if anyone has access to those numbers they'd be interesting to see. But Lowe has been one of MLB's most efficient pitchers for some time now.

1B-Laroche
2B-Polanco
LF-Nady
CP-Wagner
RF-Heyward

Polanco gives them an amazing second baseman and the ability to move Prado to super utility again as he is capable of playing all the infield positions. Kelly Johnson could now be traded to any team without having to worry about depth being an issue. LaRoche absolutely teared it up here, i think he liked what he's seen in ATL a return back is in the books. We need a closer, he's pitched in the NL East before, he wants to close and he'll give us a nasty lefty in the ninth. And who doesn't want X-man he provides great depth and if he can't stay healthy theirs always a platoon scenario where he splits time with Heyward and Church which im fine with.. the Braves have plenty of time to consider what their going to do however i feel this is one of their best routes. They should also hold on to every pitcher they have (not named Kawakami) and hope they just help propel them to the playoffs in 2010. They have a legit chance next season

I think a lot of you guys are right about lowe just having an off year and i really liked the stats about the ground balls and line drives...i think he will bounce back but it isnt certain and his 15 mi paycheck is too much for an uncertainty...i think we can trade him for some veteran bullpen arms...4 quality starters and KK is plenty to help us to the playoffs and if there are injuries, we have medlen waiting in the wings for another chance...but if we bolster our bullpen, that is something that can help us every game versus only once every 5 days...i dont really know who would want to trade with us but like someone said, once the lackey deal is finalized there will be some other teams that feel that they need starting pitching...wren will find a way to get rid of him if thats what he wants to do

i think we sign nick johnson to an incentive based contract for 2 years tops (dont want to block freeman-even though he hasnt been hitting all that well) i really like the idea of delgado but i dont really see that happening-too much of a health concern

by getting rid of lowes contract, we free up alot of money to go after an outfield bat...i like holliday and i hope we get him...i dont think bay is going anywhere other than boston...they are going to overpay for him but still keep him...so we have mclouth, a free agent bat, and diaz until heyward is ready to come up...the fourth outfield spot is going to go to either church or schafer and theyll battle it out in spring training...conrad, infante, and one other bench player on the infield(not sure who; someone that can play good D at first preferably)

The Braves already have Omar Infante as the Super Utility guy.

I don't think the Braves would have signed Hudson unless they already sent out enough feelers to make sure that they could trade one of their other starters. As a long time Braves fan I do know one thing. I can't think of a single time where they ever "ate" part of a contract. I don't think that changes now - particularly since their payroll is so tight.

Also, did anyone notice that Bobby left Lowe in waaay too long on a few occasions last year. These few bad outings negatively affected his stats. Lowe gave up 5 or more runs only six times during the season. However, he gave up 2 runs or less 16 times. Lowe is a workhorse that will give you 200+ innings every year and keep a good offensive/defensive team in almost every game. I think a lot of teams would want a player like that. Talent wise, I am fine having him back as a Brave next year. However, the Braves need the $$$ and Kawakami does well enough in the #5 starter role for much less money. Also, the Braves have a good young pitcher in Kris Medlen who could start in the even of injury.

Something I haven't seen mentioned here is trading for Dan Uggla and moving Martin Prado to 1B. Freddie Freeman will probably be ready for the majors at about the same time Chipper retires. At that point Prado moves to his more natural position at 3B and FF takes over at 1B.

I think Church and KJ are either non-tendered or traded for relief pitching. That should still leave some $$$ to sign a power hitting outfielder.

TD, you said "At the time, I didn't realize Jason Bay and Matt Holliday might be considerations."

Are you implying that Bay or Holliday might be viable options for the Braves? Is this your speculation or is there a report on this somewhere? I imagine signing one of these guys will require either the savviest dealings of bad contracts or a significant increase in payroll.

Nick Swisher's an option for LF. I think the Yankees like him, but after his postseason I can't imagine he'll be around much longer. And if they decide to keep Damon or Matsui, Swisher could be the odd man out.

Jurrjens and Schafer for Adrian and Bell.

Sign Holliday for 5 years 85MM.

CF - McLouth
2B - Prado
1B - Adrian Gonzalez
LF - Holliday
3B - Chipper
C - McCann
SS - Yunel
RF - Diaz / Heyward in June

SP - Vazquez, Hanson, Hudson, Lowe, KK

Pen - Bell, Medlen, Moylan, O'Flare

DEREK LOWE must be a terrible problem! He only won 15 games in what many think was a poor or off year. The guy is good for up to 200 innings, won 15, is a plus as a team player and is signed for awhile. The world gave up on him because of one terrible game.

We are fortunate to have Derek and I'll be surprised if he doesn't win more games that Hudson in 2010. Just stay "lowe" in the weeds, Derek, and win 15 more!

"Jurrjens and Schafer for Adrian and Bell"

Posted by: MLB in the Know | October 30, 2009 at 03:52 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------


It would take Hanson or Heyward to even start talking about AGonz alone...and he likely isn't available anyway. Braves fans need to get Adrian Gonzalez out of your heads - it isn't happening.

Holliday for 5/85 isn't happening, either. He'll command more than that.

there is absolutely nothing wrong with keeping "too much pitching"...there arent too
many "problems" that are actually good thing. As far as finding that bat unless we get a good good trade or a discount i dont see why we would. Got both schafer and heyword waiting in the outfield and freeman waiting at first base. I know that prospects dont always work out but i dont want a Ryan Howard situation where he was sitting behind Thome for a while and they could have used a couple more of his good years. I think the Braves without Huge batting injuries will be a wild card team. I dont think unless we get top notch right handed hitting will we be ready to talk about world series this year or even the next. So why not keep a good team and get the young guys involved and keep building the right way which we have been doing

BravesAlltheWay,

I like that idea. Prado doesn't hit like a first-basemen, but Uggla does and he would make up for it. Not to mention, we would save money by not having to resign LaRoche. We could retain Soriano and Gonzo, and maybe even add another OF bat, giving us 2 more instead of one, although I don't know where he would fit in the lineup.


It would take Hanson or Heyward to even start talking about AGonz alone...and he likely isn't available anyway. Braves fans need to get Adrian Gonzalez out of your heads - it isn't happening.

Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | October 30, 2009 at 04:00 PM

4+ years of Jurrjens (who is 23 and has 403 1/3 innings in the past 2 years with a 3.10 ERA) + 6+ years of Schafer (who is also 23)

for 2 years of Adrian and 2 years of Bell

Jurrjens would dominate in the cozy confines of Petco Park and Schafer is also built for Petco (defense orientated speed / gap hitter)

Didn't Lowe's K rate decrease and HR rate increase? Isn't that a sign of decline? Especially given that he is 36? He has bounced back in years past, but he has never been this old.

They should move him. He has value in this market and the Braves have holes in LF, 1B and the bullpen. If they can fill one of those needs while also gaining payroll flexibility, then they've done well.

I wanna go ahead and say that I do NOT think A-Gon will, or could be a Brave next year.

But, I think JJ and Schafer will definitely open SD's eyes. Then Freeman, Spruill, and Cody Johnson could seal it up. That's a bunch of talent, but I expect Gonzalez to bring in even more than that, being that he is apparently unavailable and any team that gets him will have to over-pay.

SIGN ADAM LAROCHE, finally give right field to Diaz full time (he has earned it), somehow add a left fielder without giving up a starting pitcher and we will be better in 2010. Philadelphia will be hard to beat, but we will be close and may at least get the wild card. With a better first half, A NEW BATTING COACH and the desire to win one for Bobby, this can be quite a year! What's wrong with dreaming?

**** Jurrjens and Schafer for Adrian and Bell. ****

I wouldnt make that trade if I was the Padres.

That being said, if I was Atlanta I would not put Hanson into any deal (I would probably not put Heyward either).

Medlen, Freeman, Schafer, and a couple of more prospects for A. Gonzalez might work, and then Atlanta is on par with the Phils.

Everyone keeps saying A. Gonzalez will go to Boston, but I dont think they can do it without Buchholz (and I dont think that they will trade Buchholz).

Their other pitchers are not nearly as good and most of their hitters are overhyped.

I haven't seen the Braves linked to Bay. But Jon Heyman said they "may consider going after" Holliday.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/jon_heyman/10/09/phillies.pitching/1.html


I notice a common thread amongst a lot of these posts, and that's that people are forgetting the fact that the Braves are adding baseball's #1 prospect to the big league club. There's no need to add two outfielders, Heyward is coming up to man RF.

We are not saying we need to add 2 OF we are saying we need one good one.

We know Heyward will be up in June.

If they can figure out the money Holliday is a perfect fit for this team.

If the Braves were to get Gonzalez who's signed ridiculously cheap it would take an insane package. I'd venture to say. Jurrjens, Medlen, Freeman and Schafer and even then I still don't think they'd do it because of what Gonzalez means to that franchise.

They traded Peavey (granted under a previous regime) who was also still on a reasonable contract. The Padres problem is that they are not going to win while they have Gonzalez under that ridiculously good contract, so they need to trade him and get something so that they can compete after that.

Look at everyone in here, I wish a team had a pitcher like Lowe as the FIFTH best pitcher on the team. Jeez

No one complains Lowe being our 5th best starter; it's the fact that he gets payed 15mm to be our 5th best starter.

On that roster Ross, Infante, Church and Lowe are overpaid relative to what they'll contribute to the team. Lowe and Church are understandable, Ross and Infante not so much. Those two could be replaced with younger, cheaper players and there wouldn't likely be a drop off in the teams performance overall. There's an opportunity for the Braves to save about $4 million bucks if they don't bring those two back.

Would you guys pull the trigger on this deal?

Angels get:

Derek Lowe - SP
Nate McLouth - CF

Braves get:

Torii Hunter - CF
Jose Arredondo - RP
Freddy Sandoval - 3B

whats hunters contract status??? im a little iffy just cause mcclouth is cheaper and younger but to get rid of lowes contract you gotta take one back

Like Lowe has his upside if we forget the fact he is being paid 15 million, Matthews ha an upside. He makes a good job of getting on base, he runs pretty well, plays excellent defense, he is a switch hitter, and he can hit 15 homers playing everyday like he has done in the past. Lowe has a bigger upside considering the success he's had in the past, but he has 3/45mill left to Matthews 2yrs 23 mill, and he'd be filling a need, he is a gold glove caliber outfielder.

You can't ask for much in return. At least Matthews is a better player than Garret Anderson. It wouldn't be Matthews for Lowe straight up. No way. But Matthews and a prospect like Peter Bourjos(right handed CF, with excellent speed) for Lowe is something that might work out.

And if the braves sign Xavier Nady, then they'll at least have a better offense than this season. And they'll have enough money to sign a Billy Wagner, and another good reliever.

That'll make the defense, offense, base running and pitching better in every aspect. And financially it'll be even better.

According to Cot:

Hunter - $18 mill over the next 3 years

With that said, no way

No way the Angels trade Hunter

Torii Hunter was an MVP candidate before his injury. Why would LAA do that?

humannature

No Way for who? The Braves should consider this deal if it were offered.

The braves might consider going after Holliday. Yeah right. They'll talk to him, offer him 15mill/per year, then the Yankees or Cardinals come in and offer him 18mill/per yr and that will be the end of it.

Maybe because Hunter is 34 Y.O., he's owed 18 mil over the next 3 seasons. It's noy like they won't get a cheaper replacement in CF to replace him who has comparable speed and power.

McLouth still has 2 years left with a third club option. I don't believe the Braves trade him away, especially for Torri Hunter. Braves fans should face the facts and take Lowe for what he is.

Even though Hunter may have lost a step(which I can't tell) he's 10x better than McLouth in CF.

I mentioned this on another thread but what about Vazquez, Cody Johnson and Craig Kimbrel for Fielder?

The point is, McLouth is still cheap and Hunter will be making $18 million. I thought the whole point was to dump Lowe's salary. Hunter for Lowe as the base of the trade with prospects thrown in would be more logical.

The Braves aren't trading McLouth - I am guessing that he is pretty close to being untouchable.

If the Braves were to get Gonzalez who's signed ridiculously cheap it would take an insane package. I'd venture to say. Jurrjens, Medlen, Freeman and Schafer and even then I still don't think they'd do it because of what Gonzalez means to that franchise.

Posted by: Jay212033 | October 30, 2009 at 05:03 PM

Do you actually believe this? If so then just wow. Jurrjens for 4 years is about equal to 2 of Gonzalez, and then you want the Braves to include Freeman (a top 20 hitter in the minors), Medlen who has some nice potential, and Schafer who still forecasts as an above average major league CF. That's ridiculous.

As for Lowe, a few years ago when Hudson came over to atlanta for his first season with the braves he struggled with the humidity and grip on the baseball. Lowe and Huddy are similar pitchers, sinkerballers, and I definitely want to see another season of Lowe before I say without a doubt that he's in "decline." This is a guy who posted top of the rotation numbers in the previous years with the dodgers and i find it hard to believe that ability just vanished

bravesfan22193

Take you homer shades off for a second and really think about it. So say if the Dodgers offered Chad Billingsley, James McDonald, Andrew Lambo and Devaris Gordon for Brian McCann would you do it?

McCann is signed through 2013 and plays a premium position, big difference. Plus Jurrjens>Billingsley, and Freeman is the best prospect out of any that you listed.

The Cards need pitching, Ludwick for Lowe. Throw in Omar, that might get it done. If they lose out on Holliday they will need to move Shumaker back to the OF and Smoltz and a minor leaguer are who they are considering for a 4th and 5th starter so a rotation of Wainright, Carpenter, Lowe, Pineiro and Smoltz could be a real good one. Of course the problem with that is they have to keep Ankiel and DeRosa and pray they bounce back.

"If the Braves were to get Gonzalez who's signed ridiculously cheap it would take an insane package. I'd venture to say. Jurrjens, Medlen, Freeman and Schafer and even then I still don't think they'd do it because of what Gonzalez means to that franchise."

If Hoyer didn't do that deal, he should be fired immediately. Sorry, that is an absurd steal for the Padres.

Now, I think the most important and beneficial thing the Braves can do is when Heyward comes up in June, to offer him a Longoria style extension. Get him locked up early.

Ludwick.. Il est bête.

I think the Cards could get more than Lowe, Ludwick can hit. Carlos Zambrano come to mind. Imagine a 1-2-3 of Carpenter, Wainwright, and Big Z. Dang.

I think Ludwick makes a good fit for ATL. How much would the Cards be asking??

"If the Braves were to get Gonzalez who's signed ridiculously cheap it would take an insane package. I'd venture to say. Jurrjens, Medlen, Freeman and Schafer and even then I still don't think they'd do it because of what Gonzalez means to that franchise."

That is a ridiculous package for Gonzalez. Yes, he is a great player, but so is Jurrjens. Then Medlen Freeman and Schafer are three of our best prospects. I really do think a Jurrjens Schafer deal could get us both Agone and Bell

Factoring in contract, that's pretty fair, maybe a minor league arm heading to SD in addition (not teheran or r. delgado) like zeke spruill. Not that it'll happen

please keep vasquez
let lowe go, I like him, but we would be better to get rid of the money for other needs, not knocking his ability, but the braves need to keep the swing and miss stuff with vasquez, its good to have one sinker baller on the team in hudson, get the bat hopefully for lowe, buy a firstbaseman and a sub par type reliever and honestly i will take my chances with anyone in the national league, we have a good chance, that being said, it doesn't matter what we do, the braves will be there the whole year, so don't count us out in the east, its gonna be fun

Lowe was not awful. If you remove 3 games where he went 3 inns or less and gave up 6+ ER his numbers are

Era = 3.89
whip = 1.39

This is right in line with his career average. And there were times when he was very good to dominating (April -begining of June, July 30 to Aug 12)

More often then not we were able to win his games, which is shown by his 15 wins, and he kept us in the games we were not able to win.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.