![]() |
|
|
| |
« Arangure On Perez, Mateo, Sano, Chapman | Main | Hoyer To Become Padres GM »
Ben Sheets plans to return to the majors in 2010, according to MLB.com's Adam McCalvy. One of Sheets' representatives says the righty is throwing of flat ground now and expects to be "more than ready to go" in Spring Training.
Sheets had a fantastic 2008 campaign, but a torn flexor tendon sidelined him this past season. Like fellow-free agents Rich Harden, Erik Bedard and Justin Duchscherer, the 31-year-old can pitch when healthy. Sheets allowed 181 hits and 47 walks in 198.1 innings, striking out 158 for an ERA of 3.09 in 31 starts a year ago.
The Brewers confirmed that they would have interest in bringing Sheets back, the Rangers nearly signed him last year and, based on recent comments, Red Sox GM Theo Epstein will likely have interest, too.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Note to Mariners - Sign Ben Sheets
Posted by: Storm | October 23, 2009 at 04:33 PM
i hope the brewers sign sheets but only if he's not asking for anything close to 10 mill.
Posted by: Mase37 | October 23, 2009 at 04:45 PM
Money on the Rangers or Astros.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 23, 2009 at 04:50 PM
How much do u think sheets will b asking for?
Posted by: bosox21 | October 23, 2009 at 05:13 PM
May the "Then ***insert team here***" will sign Ben Sheets to a 1 yr / 3 mil incentive laced contract."
Point being, most any team that wants to compete will at least take a look at this guy. No doubt.
I'm going to go ahead and agree with purple, despite their uncertain financial issues, the Rangers end up signing Sheets.
Posted by: R y a n | October 23, 2009 at 05:22 PM
It's going to be an exciting off season for us Brewers fans!
Posted by: TheKid19 | October 23, 2009 at 05:55 PM
Why would Sheets want to rebuild his value in Arlington? Seems like there are much better options to rehab your injury and build value.
Also, what the heck was going on the last 2 months. He was talking about signing back in August and he is just now throwing on flat ground. Doesn't sound like he is close to returning.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 23, 2009 at 06:09 PM
Sheets will get at least 5m from the team he wants to go to.
Posted by: 92-93 | October 23, 2009 at 08:03 PM
"Why would Sheets want to rebuild his value in Arlington? Seems like there are much better options to rehab your injury and build value."
Why wouldn't he?? The Rangers are an up and coming team and his veteran presence would only help their young pitching staff. It would be a great solution for both parties... and for those of you who have the mindset that arlington is not pitcher friendly... how do you explain this past season? imo... it's more the quality of texas' past pitchers than the ballpark.
Posted by: Optimus Dude | October 23, 2009 at 08:04 PM
Sheets may help a team make it to the playoffs but by the time october rolls around he'll be on the dl.
I don't think the brewers will be willing to pay as much for him as other teams will. They've had it with his injuries.
Posted by: JoeI | October 23, 2009 at 09:32 PM
Sheets may help a team make it to the playoffs but by the time october rolls around he'll be on the dl.
I don't think the brewers will be willing to pay as much for him as other teams will. They've had it with his injuries.
Posted by: JoeI | October 23, 2009 at 09:32 PM
The headline should read: Sheets plans to get paid in 2010. Pitching is optional
Posted by: timmytwoshoezzz | October 23, 2009 at 09:39 PM
I honestly believe that Sheets and Bedard are going to bounce back and have productive seasons in 2010. Along with Sheets and Bedard, Harden and Duchsducherer will be interesting players to watch. As a Mets fan, I would like to sign Lackey to a 4 year/$68mil contract. That's $17 mil per year. Lackey made $10 mil in 2009, so I feel that's more than a fair offer for a #2 starter. If the Mets do sign Lackey, I would consider signing either Bedard or Sheets to a 1 year deal/$5mil with incentives such as: wins/innings/starts/awards. Similiar to the contract the Red Sox gave John Smolthz. I would also tender Maine's contract, which would be very low for a starting pitcher in this league (roughly $3.5mil). Harden would most likely request a multi-year deal for more money. I wouldn't touch Marquis (overrated and would ask for a 4year/$32mil deal. The same goes for Wolf, if Lackey is on board, use the money for a LF power bat. Having a rotation of:
Santana/Lackey/Sheets or Bedard/Pelfrey/Perez/Maine would certainly help.Niese can start out at AAA and keep developing and not be rushed.
If Bedard and Sheets are healthy, they are going to attract many suitors and like I mentioned earlier, have productive season in 2010.
Posted by: captain crunch | October 23, 2009 at 09:48 PM
Sheets may be a fine pitcher, but when healthy Harden is flat out disgusting. I would much rather take the risk on him because he has such tremendous upside. He is the kinda guy that could have a season with 250 Ks and a sub 3 ERA if healthy. If I had to take a gamble on one of these pitchers it'd be Harden hands down. It is unfortunate that these talented players always have issues staying healthy, but such is the nature of the game sometimes.
Posted by: MetsvilleSlugger | October 23, 2009 at 10:36 PM
Sheets is a National League loser, no AL team should even consider bidding the highest for him.
Posted by: slashieboy | October 24, 2009 at 03:36 AM
Phone rings,
"Hello, Ben Sheets, this is Theo Epstein".
Posted by: Cyyoung | October 24, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Step it up Omar!
Posted by: OhHeySlim | October 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Instead of just signing another rehab project like smoltz theo should go out and sign lackey to a 4 year deal
then sign either sheets,harden,or bedard to one year incentive laden deals
I agree with metsvillslugger harden is flat out nasty when he's healthy
Posted by: bosox21 | October 24, 2009 at 11:29 AM
I think the Dodgers need to go after this guy. Alot of their fans over in the Dodgers Ace post are talking about making the dumbest trades ever with the Braves
Posted by: NYBravosFan | October 24, 2009 at 11:55 AM
"and for those of you who have the mindset that arlington is not pitcher friendly... how do you explain this past season? imo... it's more the quality of texas' past pitchers than the ballpark."
What do you mean how do you explain last season? Arlington was the 7th best hitters' park in the majors. In fact, here are its park factors for the last 8 years:
2009: 1.085 (7th)
2008: 1.142 (1st)
2007: 0.979 (19th)
2006: 1.081 (5th)
2005: 1.076 (7th)
2004: 1.217 (2nd)
2003: 1.216 (7th)
2002: 1.246 (6th)
Only once has Arlington's league ranking in park factor been lower than 7th. It's clearly not an ideal place for a rehabbing pitcher to get back into the game.
Posted by: No Homer | October 24, 2009 at 06:23 PM
I hope the Brewers will do whatever they can to get their shut-down ace back.
But if they are unwilling to do whatever it takes, I hope that the Rangers will sign Sheets; Mike Maddux is there as the pitching coach, and Maddux understands Sheets -- and pitchers -- like no one else. (One reason the Brewers really fell off this year was due to Maddux signing with the Rangers.)
Posted by: openid.aol.com/LSekhmet | October 25, 2009 at 05:45 PM
It's not just that the general park factors at Arlington are bad, it's that they are especially bad for a guy like Sheets, who gives up a lot of HR: Arlington inflates HR. A groundball guy I wouldn't worry about as much, especially with the middle infield the Rangers have now.
In response to "slashieboy": how is Sheets a "NL loser"? He's put up really excellent seasons playing for some crappy Brewers clubs (exempting the 2008 club). If you want to say he's not worth it because of the overwhelming injury concern, that's one thing, but if you're looking at his 86-83 career record in the NL and translating that into losses in the AL, that's just dumb.
Also, "captain crunch", teams can't based contract incentives on qualitative stats like Wins (which is the worst category ever anyway), only on playing time or awards.
As a Brewers fan, I'd rather have Sheets at 1yr/$5mil than Looper at 1yr/6.5mil.
Posted by: Robert Baumann | October 26, 2009 at 08:00 AM