« Olney On Lackey, Astros, Rangers, Doumit, Carroll |
Main
| Rays Notes: Crawford, Swindle »
By Zach Links [November 14, 2009 at 1:50pm CST]
The Mets plan to be serious bidders for the services of
John Lackey, writes
David Lennon of Newsday. GM Omar Minaya reportedly "received a favorable first impression" from a meeting earlier this week with Lackey's agent, Steve Hilliard. Lennon points out that the Mets successfully zeroed in on free agent closer
Francisco Rodriguez last offseason and secured his services for $37MM over three years, short of what some expected.
Here's a look at some of the other tidbits Lennon brings us in this piece:
- If the Mets sign the versatile Chone Figgins, he would be placed in left field. Under that plan, Lennon says the Mets could be stuck with Luis Castillo. As one might expect, the expensive addition of Figgins would rule out outfielders Jason Bay and Matt Holliday.
- The Mets could be keeping tabs on Carlos Delgado as part of their plan to ink Figgins. The 37-year-old, if deemed healthy, would be a reasonably priced solution at first base.
- Although Minaya wouldn't rule out an extension for Jeff Francoeur, Lennon says it is not likely to happen.
When was the last time Figgins played LF? TERRIBLE IDEA!
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 01:51 PM
no no. trade castillo. trade for phillips and arroyo. sign holliday. sign both harden and sheets. sign holliday
Posted by: clos79 | November 14, 2009 at 01:56 PM
downright stupid idea.
Hudson + Holliday > Delgado + Figgins
Posted by: supersteve1492 | November 14, 2009 at 01:57 PM
I don't mind the mets not using their top prospects as long as they sign lackey and figgins and delgado.
During the season they could trade for a power bat.
Lackey sign to a 3 year 50 million deal?
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 01:57 PM
dont sign holliday twice ha n sign delgado
harden - 1yr incentive based w/ 1 yr option
sheets - same
delgado - same
holliday - not to sure with all the speculation
Posted by: clos79 | November 14, 2009 at 01:58 PM
If you could get lacky for 50 million than you can still bring in Holliday and keep Delgado far away.
Posted by: supersteve1492 | November 14, 2009 at 01:58 PM
Holliday is going to break the bank.
Orlando hudson is another luis castillo and he's losing his speed.
Saving money and prospects.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 02:00 PM
i like the idea of lackey, but they need power from somewhere other than delgado because he is not reliable because of his injury, but i guess they can get someone at the break
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 14, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Whoever is stuck with Castillo is going to get a season full of dropped pop ups and poor defense. Hopefully that team just won't be the Mets.
Posted by: supersteve1492 | November 14, 2009 at 02:02 PM
Trade Luis for for speedy Juan Peirre for left/bench, Pick O-Dog for second Sign Holliday, and try for Lackey and Marquie. This article sounds like a down grade, I would like to see a cheap Delgado Platooning at firt until Ike Davis comes up.
Posted by: kocur26 | November 14, 2009 at 02:03 PM
"Lackey sign to a 3 year 50 million deal?"
Really? He turned down a 73 million dollar deal before the year started. He's looking for 5 or 6 years 100 million. 3 years won't cut it.
" trade for phillips and arroyo."
Not going to happen. Maybe Arroyo, but Phillips will stay unless they are completely overwhelmed with the offer.
Mets will sign Lackey and Delgado this offseason. Chone Figgins playing the OF is a bad idea. I don't think the Mets can sign both Lackey and Holliday...
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 02:03 PM
Are the Mets still taking to the Dodgers and Cubs about taking Luis Castillo?
Posted by: supersteve1492 | November 14, 2009 at 02:06 PM
I think so, last I heard.
Posted by: kocur26 | November 14, 2009 at 02:07 PM
I think so, Last I heard.
Posted by: kocur26 | November 14, 2009 at 02:08 PM
If the Mets want to compete in the NL East, this is what they must do.
Sign Holliday - 6 years 100MM.
Sign Lackey - 4 years 60MM.
Sign Figgins - 3 years 33MM.
Sign N. Johnson - 1 + 1 5MM per season.
Sign Wolf - 2 years 15MM.
Sign B. Molia - 1 year 8MM.
Trade Castillo for nothing.
Of course that won't happen, but that is what it would take for them to compete! Go Braves!!!
Posted by: MLB in the Know | November 14, 2009 at 02:08 PM
Halladay is not the answer because it would be too many prospects and money to sign him to an extension.
Lackey would be a good number 2 behind johan.
Phillips would be a great option but can only be done by trading castillo(castillo for pierre, not that bad)
Sign delgado
Ss reyes
Lf pierre
Cf beltran
3b wright
2b phillips
1b delgado
Rf francoeur
C santos/ thole
Santana
Lackey
Maine
Pelfrey
Neive/perez
Phillips wouldn't take too many prospects, maybe one of tejada,havens and one of familia, rutisch or moviel and another b prospect.
That wouldn't break the bank in terms of money or prospects.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 02:09 PM
^^ I meant that to be Wolf 2 years 25MM.
Posted by: MLB in the Know | November 14, 2009 at 02:11 PM
People will call the Mets dumb for thinking Figgins can play LF, yet this is probably not their idea at all. Not to mention Omar said he needs a slugger.
I still think this Mets' "interest" in Figgins is b/c of the Phillies needing a 3B. I'll believe Figgins as the Mets' LF'er when I see it, but I'm not going to blast the organization since its these writers who think of these ideas.
Posted by: Baseball Nut | November 14, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Sorry about TWO of those. My question is why wouldn't they want to sign Frenchy to a long term deal, do it. He's Wrights age, and they will grow together, you'd have Wright, Reyes, and Frenchy growing old together, and the Mets NEED 7 more guys like him. That dude will play with broken thumbs, and a left arm, a busted knee, and a broken Neck if he had to.
Posted by: kocur26 | November 14, 2009 at 02:12 PM
I should have made that a little clearer - I'm not going to blast the organization until I actually SEE it happen. But for now I'm just going to write it off as a dumb speculated idea from a beat writer.
Posted by: Baseball Nut | November 14, 2009 at 02:13 PM
The big question is.
are the dodgers intersted in Luis Castillo to play 2B or are they interested to unload Juan Pierre on us.
Its kind of like last year with Mets and Dodgers taliking Andruw Jones.
Posted by: supersteve1492 | November 14, 2009 at 02:13 PM
1. Reyes 2. Figgins 3. Beltran...thats a crazy top of the lineup...I dunno how Figgins defense in the OF is...but he he has good defense in the OF that would be great...It looks as if the Mets are playing to Citifield... built around speed and defense..if they can get a taker for Castillo n bring in a Felipe Lopez or Hudson..that will be a pretty offesnsive lineup regardless of the power. Signing Lackey would also plug a big hole in the rotation
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 14, 2009 at 02:14 PM
I hate the Mets and Yankees and all the high price budget teams because it is not fair to the other people its all this talk on high teams getting Holliday but what about the lo teams!
Posted by: Black-And-Proud | November 14, 2009 at 02:16 PM
The Lackey news, which is actually hard news unlike the rest of the speculative article, is not good. The man has had injury problems throughout his career. I understand that he is a top 20 pitcher when healthy, but what happens when the worst FO/training staff in the league gets its hands on him? He'll be another J.J. Putz. Absolutely not.
The Mets need to make a deal for Roy Halladay and extend him, and then spend whatever is left on either one big power hitter (Jason Bay's stock seems to be dropping) or a sprinkling of it. Figgins should be out of the question.
Posted by: metsobsessed | November 14, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Phillips will get them a good amount of young talent. He hits for a decent avg., has power, and drives in close 100 RBIs. Not to mention, he's a gold glover.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 02:17 PM
Nonono
Halladay is bad idea!
Having two pitchers locked up to 20 plus for multiple years is a horrible idea.
I know one two punch is great but NO!
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 02:20 PM
sign lackey 5 years 80 mill.
resign Delgado 1 year 2 mill with big incentives
Sign Dye 1 year 8 mill
sign Molina 1 year 6 mill.
sign Brandon lyon 1 year 3 mill.
At the break trade for a big bat
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 14, 2009 at 02:20 PM
"Phillips will get them a good amount of young talent. He hits for a decent avg., has power, and drives in close 100 RBIs. Not to mention, he's a gold glover."
Not unless the Mets also get Arroyo or Harang in the deal and then pick up all of their salary. Then the Mets should either get another good player in return or not have to give up any significant prospects.
Posted by: QueensKing | November 14, 2009 at 02:21 PM
IF we did get Lackey, he'd be better to have than Perez, Maine, Pelfrey, Neive, and Neise, right? Or would you rather Have any of those Five pitch before Him, I would Love Roy, but speaking of unloading your team, Man, they want Quality over Quanity.
Posted by: kocur26 | November 14, 2009 at 02:21 PM
I'm still for signing Marquis. Trade Castillo, his value is finally high enough. Sign Ronnie Belliard, he out performed Hudson last year on the same team.
Lackey,Marquis and a reliver.
Barajas
I'm still unsure of 1stbase
Trade for Crawford. Stealing bases will score runs.
Oh and of course, move home plate up 10 feet so the outfield becomes smaller and Citifield saves money on the process.
Posted by: nymets86 | November 14, 2009 at 02:22 PM
to revise my recent post:
-Sign lackey 5 year 85 mill
-Resign Delgado 3 mill with a ton of incentives
-trade for phillips after dumping castillo
-Sign Benjie 1 year 6 mill
-Sign Brandon Lyon 2 year 6 mill
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 14, 2009 at 02:27 PM
what would it take to get phillips, and no they wouldnt have to take on harang or phillips
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 14, 2009 at 02:28 PM
take on arroyo not phillips^
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 14, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Johan is GoD
Brandon phillips
For
Reese havens
Brad holt
Moviel
Sounds plenty
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 02:32 PM
i would do that
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 14, 2009 at 02:33 PM
yes, they would have to take on harang or phillips. The only way the Reds consider trading Phillips is to get salary relief, since Phillips doesn't make all that much, but plays beyond his contract, the way the Reds would be getting that salary relief is pawning off harang or arroyo on another team as part of a trade for Phillips.
Posted by: MLB in the Know | November 14, 2009 at 02:36 PM
"Nonono
Halladay is bad idea!
Having two pitchers locked up to 20 plus for multiple years is a horrible idea.
I know one two punch is great but NO!"
I am not going to dispute the fact that there is a risk in such a plan.
However...
I do think it is important to stress that risk-taking is inevitable if you want to put a winning team out there. The only exception to the rule are the Yankees, who seem to have an unlimited pot of cash to make failures a non-issue.
At the last trade deadline, the Phillies had enough in their farm to take both Lee and Halladay. If they had done so, I would have bet on the Phillies beating the Yanks in the WS, and would also bet on them doing the treble in 2010. However, they chose not to, because gutting the farm was perceived as too much of a risk -- even if it would have given them a very real shot at three consecutive World Series titles (and possibly more...)
The Mets seem to be in a real pickle. On the one hand, you have some great pieces. On the other hand, you don't have enough of them to say that it will only take 1-2 signings to put you over the top. As well as that, the state of the Mets' farm is up for debate.
Signing Lackey would be a sign of intent - an intention to make a real run at the WS. But look, if you're going to choose that direction, why not go for Halladay? Halladay and Santana would be the best 1-2 in baseball, you'd tear up the NL, and stand a much better chance at driving past the Phillies and the Yankees.
You'd also need a bat, of course. More investment.
So it is all very well to say 'bad idea', and maybe it is. But you really cannot half-ass these things. It always pains me to see fans who want the best of everything. It really doesn't work that way. You need to be willing to embrace risk in order to go in the direction you want to. That can mean being willing to suffer in the hope that your prospects come good in three or four years as much as it can mean committing hundreds of millions of dollars to win now.
I'm just unconvinced by many of the suggestions by Mets fans.
Posted by: Theodore | November 14, 2009 at 02:36 PM
-Sign Holliday 6/102
-Sign Bengie Molina 1/4 or 2/7
-Trade Castillo for nothing
-Trade Brad Holt, Ruben Tejada, Jefry Marte for Brandon Phillips and Bronson Arroyo. (Pick up ALL of their salary).
-Sign Sheets/Bedard/Harden.
Posted by: QueensKing | November 14, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Great, so Omar is going to sign Figgins, Delgado, Molina and Pineiro. What a garbage offseason that would be.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | November 14, 2009 at 02:39 PM
Holliday: 7 year/ 129 mil
Trade Neisse, Evans, Tejada, Mejia, and someone else (Maine?) for Halladay.
Wolf: 2 year/ 25 mil + option
Jamey Carrol: 1 year/ 1 mil
Eric Hinske: 2 year/ 3 mil
Trade AA prospects for Shoppach: good young option to keep the seat warm with Santos until Thole is ready.
Extend Francouer! We need more heart guys like him, Santana, and Wright. Thats another reason why Halladay and Holliday are good ideas: they play their hearts out every game.
Sign an above average releiver: 1 year / 1 mil
Lineup:
SS Reyes
2B Castillo
CF Beltran
LF Holliday
3B Wright
1B Murphy
RF Francouer
C Santos/Shoppach
P Pitcher
Rotation:
Halladay
Santana
Wolf
Pelfrey
Perez
(if he's not traded, Maine goes to the 'pen)
Bench:
Pagan
Hinske
Carrol
Santos/Thole
@beastOftheeast:
Usually, I would agree with you. Multiple big contracts to pitchers are not a good idea. But come on, it's Santana and Halladay. Through in Wolf, and thats the best 1-2-3 in the league. Plus, Doc is a horse and Santana has more heart then any Met, so I get the sense that they won't be sidlined.
Thoughts?
Posted by: diehardmets | November 14, 2009 at 02:41 PM
"If the Mets want to compete in the NL East, this is what they must do.
Sign Holliday - 6 years 100MM.
Sign Lackey - 4 years 60MM.
Sign Figgins - 3 years 33MM.
Sign N. Johnson - 1 + 1 5MM per season.
Sign Wolf - 2 years 15MM.
Sign B. Molia - 1 year 8MM.
Trade Castillo for nothing.!"
Holy Type A's Batman
Posted by: CitizenSnips | November 14, 2009 at 02:44 PM
"Holy Type A's Batman"
And this is what happens to the Mets farm.
Also, I think Figgins will take a 5 year deal somewhere.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 02:47 PM
they should go for Bay over Holliday IMO
and this is kind of off topic, but if Delgado is good enough to play 1st next year, the Giants should take a look on like a 1 year deal.
idk, just a thought
Posted by: JoeyE | November 14, 2009 at 02:52 PM
Diehardmets
Halladay would take
3 of the mets top 5 prospects
Then a extension
Plus 20million
Signing holliday equals 38 million
Wolf=12
50 million plus 10 to complete other deals
20plus to their 2009 payroll(money they don't have
Farmsystem is clear of good prospects :(
But the mets will contend for the world series with that team
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 02:54 PM
Halladay will test the market guaranteed. He will not sign an extension unless it is like 6 years $150 Million. Because he'll prob get that from the yankees the following year.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 03:00 PM
Another reason NOT to sign halladay
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 03:02 PM
Who cares about the Type A's? The Mets first round pick is protected right? A second round pick for a Tyoe A is well-worth it.
Posted by: jza1218 | November 14, 2009 at 03:02 PM
ChasenWerth,
You'd be hard-pressed to find a Jays fan who would say that Halladay's priority is money.
I think if Doc had a choice between competing this year for slightly less money, or seeing out a lame duck season with the Jays and taking the jackpot in 2011, he'd choose the former.
Posted by: Theodore | November 14, 2009 at 03:03 PM
I'm not denying that he wouldn't go to a contender this offseason (Mets, Phillies, Yanks, or Redsox mainly)...I'm saying that he will test the market after this year.
BTW, even if he gets traded he makes the same amount. It's called a contract. (15.75 Million this year)
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 03:10 PM
"BTW, even if he gets traded he makes the same amount. It's called a contract. (15.75 Million this year)"
Yes. And the difference in contract he can negotiate now or as a free agent could change dramatically.
Obviously. (ooh, look, I can do sarcasm too. Fun.)
Posted by: Theodore | November 14, 2009 at 03:16 PM
As a Braves fan, I am keeping my fingers crossed that the Mets sign John Lackey to a long-term, $100M+ contract.
Posted by: parrothead8 | November 14, 2009 at 03:17 PM
In other news ...
Mets have become the LA Angels of the East. Signing Vlad, bringing back Oliver are next on the docket.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 14, 2009 at 03:17 PM
"I'm not denying that he wouldn't go to a contender this offseason (Mets, Phillies, Yanks, or Redsox mainly)...I'm saying that he will test the market after this year."
Wait wait wait.... you included the Mets in the contenders list with the Phillies, Yanks and Red Sox.
The same Mets that won just 70 game this year? If he wants to be closer to contending, he should stay with the Jays who won 75!
Posted by: MLB in the Know | November 14, 2009 at 03:20 PM
Even if Halladay has his worst season ever, his contract will not be much different.
He will get 22-25 million.
"I think if Doc had a choice between competing this year for slightly less money"
Is what I was referencing to. He will not make less money this year because of his contract. He will make 15.75 million. You could be right about the contract in 2011, but not in 2010.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 03:23 PM
MLB, we all know that the Mets had a lot of injuries and a guy like Halladay could make a huge difference. If they were able to get Halladay and one of Figgins, Holliday, or Bay; they would most def. be contenders.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 03:25 PM
Only after they establish their true loyalty to the Stankees are Newsday.com sports columnists permitted to become Mets beat writers, IMO.
It's more likely that a Newsday.com Mets beat writer is helping the Stankees accomplish their offseason plans, IMO.
Posted by: 1metfan | November 14, 2009 at 03:25 PM
The only place Halladay would give a discount to, I believe, is the Rockies (but I don't see it happening...)
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 03:27 PM
Mets fans are crazy.
~ Sign three of the top four free agents, then trade our middling prospects for All*Stars. Look at our line-up now! Look at how good we'll be!
Try rooting for a real team, one where bullcrap, pie-in-the-sky rosterbation isn't an option. And stop losing to the Phillies, ya jokers.
Posted by: rudolf | November 14, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Wow beast of east your ripping off the ideas of others never seems to amaze me.... i know exactly where you got that trade scenario from and where you formulated that lineup. Your getting recognition because the person who created those ideas actually had a brain. Way to rip off someone elses ideas and feel proud that your getting recognition for their doings. You should be proud
Posted by: SouvenirCityBaby | November 14, 2009 at 03:31 PM
Orlando hudson is another luis castillo and he's losing his speed.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Castillo had a total of 16 XBH last year. Hudson had 35 doubles in addition to 6 triples and 9 HRs.
Castillo is losing his speed, too. Hudson at least can drive the ball into the gaps to make his declining speed less of an issue.
Posted by: icedrake523 | November 14, 2009 at 03:33 PM
C-J.Molina
1B-D.Murphy
2B-B.Phillips
3B-D.Wright
SS-J.Reyes
LF-C.Figgins
CF-C.Beltran
RF-J.Francoeur
Posted by: FreeSide | November 14, 2009 at 03:50 PM
"C-J.Molina"
Jose Molina? I hope you mean Bengie Molina. As a Yankees fan I can tell you, you don't want Jose Molina starting he can't even hit his weight. He's listed at 235 lbs and his career average is .235 and last year he hit .217. >.<
Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 14, 2009 at 03:54 PM
The funniest part of all this is that Mets fans actually think the Jays would take any of those packages for Halladay.
Posted by: monstermash | November 14, 2009 at 04:02 PM
if they get halladay, they will be ruined for years to come
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 14, 2009 at 04:03 PM
My bad i meant Bengie
Posted by: FreeSide | November 14, 2009 at 04:04 PM
C - Bring in a cheap veteran to split time with Josh Thole. Keep Omir Santos around at AAA as an emergency backup.
1B - This is a true hole. I'm in favor of a stopgap until Ike Davis is ready. Davis has done nothing but mash since the 2009 season began and is probably the Mets' top prospect.
2B - If you can move Castillo and bring in Hudson, great, that'd be a marginal improvement. Castillo is pretty miserable with the glove and will probably not repeat his 2009 performance with the stick.
SS - Jose Reyes
3B - David Wright
LF - Sign Holliday or Bay. The Mets sorely need another bat in the middle of the lineup. Omar usually makes at least one big free-agent splash per offseason, and I think this is where he'll make the big move.
CF - Carlos Beltran
RF - Let Jeff Francouer have a shot, and hope that Fernando Martinez stays healthy enough to make a run at the starting job by midseason.
Bench - Daniel Murphy backs up the corner infield slots. Alex Cora or whatever throw-and-catch guy backs up the middle infield slots. Angel Pagan is perfectly cast as 4th outfielder. Jeremy Reed or some other throw-and-catch guy it the 5th outfielder.
At AAA you have Omir Santos, Fernando Martinez, Ike Davis, Chris Carter, Nick Evans and the usual dreck like Cory Sullivan, etc.
Now, the Mets' pitching is a mess. Basically you have Johan Santana and a bunch of #5 starters. I don't believe they'll be able to sign both an impact bat and Lackey. Santana is of course a true ace, I think Jon Niese can give them reasonably decent production and Pelfrey... well, I suppose Pelfrey eats you some innings. They're going to need another pitcher who misses some bats, so I'd advise taking a flyer on Harden or some other injury-discount type guy.
The bullpen is in similar disarray; K-Rod is at at the very least a solid closer, Feliciano is a quality setup guy and Parnell has some ability. Beyond that the Mets don't have a lot of arms out there that I'd consider reliable. This is one area where the thin farm system has really hurt them; they haven't really been able to plug bullpen holes with quality arms from the minor league system.
It's going to take a lot of good fortune for the Mets to contend in 2010. I think the offense could be pretty decent, but the pitching staff is just chock full of question marks. Considering the GM is a card-carrying idiot, he'll probably make at least one or two dunderheaded moves that cripple the team in future seasons. But the Wright-Beltran-Reyes-Santana core deserves at least one more shot at contending. If the Mets lose 90 games again this year, Minaya will probably be fired and a true rebuilding period will begin.
Posted by: JK47 | November 14, 2009 at 04:18 PM
Fixing the Mets isn't hard. Spend your way out Yankees style
1)Sign
Harden + Sheets
Mmm...loves me some injury prone Ace's.
Go red sox up on this B#$@h.
Something along the lines of 8 mil base, incentives to make it ace money. (Not too many teams can handle such a risk on base)
*Obviously have insurance pitchers, maybe even skip every 2 starts to keep under 200+ innings.
2)Orlando hudson
-They've been flirting with Hudson since last year, Play Hudson 60-40 and have Castillo learn to play SS when Reyes gets injured..T_T
3)Nick Johnson
-1B, another problem for the Mets. Big dude should really be considered for the D but he sees a crapload of pitches and gets on base. *Plus murphy is no where near read to be an everyday 1B. Split time 70-30 and keep Johnson healthy.
4)Bengie Molina
-Clearly found the Fountain of youth (or some really good stuff), either way his services are no longer needed in SF due to Posey and do you really trust Omir santos or Thole behind the plate?
*Bonus points for being latino, you know Minaya loves that =D
5)Justin Duchscherer
-Mets pick up a trifecta of injury prone pitchers and go with a 6 man rotation to keep all healthy.
Again, Mets can give him a higher base & still reward for top of the rotation type numbers.
Posted by: Gleb | November 14, 2009 at 04:32 PM
6)Matt Holliday
-Really the only good hitter/fielder on the market. 5 year contract makes him 34 at end I think the Mets will get Borassed to a 6 or even worse 7 year deal. 115 for 7 seems like something a desperate team would do.
Lineup
(S)Hudson (2B)
(S)Reyes (SS)
(R)Wright (3B)
(S)Beltran (CF)
(R)Holliday (LF)
(L)Johnson (1B)
(R)Molina
(R)Francoeur (RF)
--Pitcher--
--Pitching--
1)Santana
Harden
Sheets
Duchscherer
Maine
6)Pelfrey
(Perez, Nieve, Parnell,Figueroa are backups.)
*Demote Niese back to AAA & look at stats Midseason.
6 man rotation for the win.
I would personally be scared $hitless facing a rotation of Santana, Harden, Sheets in a short playoff series.
That lineup looks pretty amazing actually.
It's a crapload of money but if assembled that World series worthy on paper.
$ on paper.
Holliday
(7 years 115)
Duchscherer
(3 years, 6 base, 10-15 potential)
Molina
(1 year 10 mil, team option 2nd year.)
Johnson
(2 year 18 mil)
Hudson
(2 year 16 mil, team option 3rd-10 mil.)
Sheets
(3 years, 6 base, 12-18 potential)
Harden
(3 years, 7 Base 12-19 potential)
Here's your quick fix Minaya, (Thank me later) or pack the bags after another 3rd or 4th place finish.
Posted by: Gleb | November 14, 2009 at 04:32 PM
Gleb...wow...as $215M "quick fixes" go, that's an interesting one. 6 man rotation isn't necessarily a bad idea, I just don't see them doing it. Also, the Mets aren't likely to take many risks on injury prone guys because of last year, which happened with guys that are no necessarily injury prone, and because they don't outspend there mistakes. Hell, Castillo was getting paid $6M last year and they acted as though they had a gun to their head at 2nd base. Which is another reason that Perez can be terrible again, but he won't be 6th or 7th starter. The team has a lot of holes, but a lot of talent as well. This isn't the management group that will put that talent together and win a championship, or fill the existing holes. Maybe in 2012, you know, just before the world ends.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | November 14, 2009 at 04:51 PM
JK47 It has been said that if the Mets don't get off to a good start in the first month him and Manuel will both be gone, so Mets fans wishes could be coming true even before the close of 2010.
As for the Mets in 2010, I do not see them contending for a playoff spot, so I am looking at 2010 as a starting point for 2011.
C-stay away from any long term commitments for 2010. The 2011 FA class is stronger with names like Mauer, Pierzynski, Laird. Also the Mets should take a good look at Santos this year and see if he could be a defensive minded catcher with a decent stick
1b-Its put up or shut up time for Murphy and Ike Davis in 2010. Davis is getting a little old to be a prospect (he will be 23 this spring) and still hasn't shown he can hit above AA ball. He needs to cut down his strikeout numbers drastically and make big strides in the minors for the Mets to consider him for the future. Murphy needs to have a strong showing that he can be a good hitter on an everyday basis. If Murphy and Davis don't have strong and promising campaigns in 2010, the Mets need to go in a different direction
2b-You are stuck with Castillo unless he is moved. I am not going to bother saying anything else
SS- Hope Reyes rebounds. There are really no options on the FA market in 2011 and the Mets have no prospects in place to replace him. Wilmer Flores will start the year in high A and is still 4-5 years away from seeing MLB time.
3b-This is where my thinking gets a little crazy! Obviously Wright is the 3b for 2010. But I think the Mets should do everything they can to sign Figgins to play LF in 2010. If after 2010 Murphy and Ike Davis still don't look promising, shift Wright to 1b and Figgins back to 3b. Stick with me here it will all be explained!
CF- Beltran
LF/RF- Figgins in LF for 2010. Presuming Murphy and Ike Davis don't make strides, shift Wright to 1b, Figgins to 3b, and at this point Fernando Martinez should be ready to take over a corner OF spot. Than look to the FA market to fill the other. Names like Dunn, Hawpe, Crawford and Werth will be available in this FA class.
2011 Mets offense:
C Santos or a free agent( probably not Mauer but maybe Laird)
1b Wright
2b Castillo
SS Reyes
3b Figgins
OF Beltran
OF Fmart
OF Crawford/Werth/Hawpe/Dunn
Stay away from any long term commitments in the rotation this offseason and see where Niese is and if Maine can bounce back. If the rotation is still a question mark than go after FA SP's after the 2010 season. Some potential FA targets for the 2011 team: Beckett, Vazquez, Lilly, Halladay, Cliff Lee, Webb, Westbrook.........a much better crop of starting pitchers next year. Don't overpay for Lackey when you could get someone as good or better next year.
Posted by: yanks09 | November 14, 2009 at 04:55 PM
I WILL EAT MY HAT IF WERTH BECOMES A MET!
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 05:29 PM
If Werth has another great year (which he will), he will most likely be a BoSock, if they can't resign Bay. He'd be a great fit in that line-up and his HRs will continue to go up. He has the capability to hit 40+ HRs no doubt.
If Taylor continues to hit, the Phils will prob. not resign Werth, although they should.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 05:38 PM
Not evry phillie fan hates the mets?
I was rooting for the phils in the world series!
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 05:56 PM
I'm guessing you wouldn't mind seeing D Wright in a Phils uni.
I don't hate the Mets. In fact, I like most of their players. But when teams are rivals, they can't swap players...it's just too weird.
Like when Johnny Damon went to the Yanks, he just wasn't the same to me.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 06:02 PM
D wright for ryan howard? Lol
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 06:24 PM
"D wright for ryan howard? Lol"
David Wright for Chase Utley would be a more even deal. IMO they are almost the exact same player.
Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 14, 2009 at 06:26 PM
Except Chase plays 2B and is a left-handed hitter and Wright plays 3B and is a right-handed hitter. But in terms of production, attitude, work ethic, leadership, etc. they are almost exactly the same.
Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 14, 2009 at 06:29 PM
I agree but i ll rather have howard because of his ability to hit the ball out of any ballpark
Posted by: beastOftheEast | November 14, 2009 at 06:33 PM
Sign Halladay, Lackey, Harden, Figgins, and trade for Brandon Phillips. Is that seriously your solution??
Crazy as$ jokers.
Posted by: rudolf | November 14, 2009 at 06:37 PM
Chase Utley owns Citi Field.
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 06:40 PM
"Sign Halladay, Lackey, Harden, Figgins, and trade for Brandon Phillips. Is that seriously your solution??"
That could honestly be the solution to the Pirates as well, lol. Almost any team could make the playoffs with that solution.
3 Solid Pitchers and two solid IFs can makea HUGE DIFFERENCE
Posted by: ChasenWerth | November 14, 2009 at 06:42 PM
i am a die hard mets fan and i now know the reason why no one takes us serious on this site...
the trade proposals and the FA signings you guys are drawing up is so dumb its hard to comprehend ... you want to add 50 million to the payroll in one off season??
good idea.. add so much to the payroll on guys that fit "right now" and forget about the free agents for years to come
you want to trade the farm for one player... who you would have to extend until he is 40 for him to even think about waiving his no trade clause (halladay)
your talking about signing like 6 guys.. you are aware there are 29 other teams in the league right?
its just really frustrating reading these comments and thinking that you people believe its even remotely possible
Posted by: wright is my boy | November 14, 2009 at 07:15 PM
The Mets put Figgins in the outfield and we win 80 games tops. Anybody who thinks that bum is worth more than 4 mill is absolutely nuts. Did we already forget what we had on the field last year? Omar is a friggin cracked pot!
Posted by: omargottago | November 14, 2009 at 09:17 PM
Hello! We're in need of a power hitting LF, a 2nd baseman with pop and 2 quality pitchers!! Figgins? FIGGINS??? I keep waiting for the punchline to this joke. Small ball blows majorly. Small ball teams don't make it to the World Series. HR's and slugging % gets you to the World Series and Pitching wins it. I'm gonna go puke now....excuse me.
Posted by: omargottago | November 14, 2009 at 09:23 PM
I like this proposal
We get Castillo and Delgado back!!! Figgins could be a utility player and Pagan could start in left. and all you people with your elaborate trade proposals can fly a kite.
Posted by: xplosive | November 14, 2009 at 10:13 PM
let Delgado walk + leave figgins alone + sign Holliday + a pitcher or two + keep everyone healthy + fire minaya= pennant= world series
Posted by: ThinkMrmet | November 14, 2009 at 11:03 PM
"maybe even skip [Harden and Sheets] every 2 starts to keep under 200+ innings."
That won't be a concern. Sheets hastn't thrown 200 innings since 2004. Harden has never thrown 150.
Posted by: jwb | November 15, 2009 at 08:21 AM
Why are people opposed to picking up Arroyo? Here are some numbers from 2009 to compare
Arroyo 15-13 3.84 ERA 220.1 IP 3 CG 127 SO
Lackey 11-8 3.83 ERA 176.1 IP 1 CG 139 SO
He has pitched over 200 innings each year for the last 5 years, the man is a workhorse. Lackey's ERA beats Arroyo's but right now we need stability, not number 2 starter who can't pitch the whole year.
Oh and if we could pick up Phillips along with him all the better.
Posted by: guydavis | November 15, 2009 at 09:06 AM
"Why are people opposed to picking up Arroyo? Here are some numbers from 2009 to compare
Arroyo 15-13 3.84 ERA 220.1 IP 3 CG 127 SO
Lackey 11-8 3.83 ERA 176.1 IP 1 CG 139 SO
He has pitched over 200 innings each year for the last 5 years, the man is a workhorse. Lackey's ERA beats Arroyo's but right now we need stability, not number 2 starter who can't pitch the whole year.
Oh and if we could pick up Phillips along with him all the better."
if you watched baseball you would clearly know why.
lackey pitched in the American league
arroyo national if arroyo was in the american his ERA would be closer to 5. he also wouldn't be pitching that deep into games if he was in the american league
Posted by: patrick | November 15, 2009 at 09:15 AM
Patrick, that's nice speculation but my point was clearly the fact that Arroyo can stay healthy and I'm just not sure if Lackey can. If he goes to the Mets he wont be in the American League so we wont have to worry about that will we?
Posted by: guydavis | November 15, 2009 at 09:23 AM
so in a playoff game you rather pitch arroyo over lackey?
Posted by: patrick | November 15, 2009 at 09:43 AM
no
Posted by: guydavis | November 15, 2009 at 09:47 AM
santana
lackey
santana
arroyo
arroyo can eat innings, okay i rather have a guy pitch 6/7 quality innings rather then 8 innings of 5 run baseball.
the risk reward is too high to pass on lackey thats just my opinion
Posted by: patrick | November 15, 2009 at 09:47 AM
I think I'd rather have Lackey too, but like you said it's a risk and after last season I think the team needs some stability.
Just wanted to address the fact that people are hating on Arroyo when he put up Lackey-like numbers in 2009.
Posted by: guydavis | November 15, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Santana
Lackey
Arroyo
How about that?
Posted by: guydavis | November 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM
I feel we should really focus on trading with the Reds and maybe the Tigers as well. The only prospect I would not trade is Davis but anyone else could go to the Reds. I think it will take more than people think to get Phillips seeing as the Reds could just dump Harang and/or Arroyo. They don't actually need to unload Phillips so they'll want at least some good prospects for him, he is definitely NOT just a salary dump like the two pitchers are. And yet again the big FAs ala Matt Holliday/John Lackey are overvalued and I can easily predict the fans will complain about them for years to come if we sign them. Oliver Perez and Luis Castillo are bad enough and were bad from the very moment they were signed to those contracts. Please don't add Holliday for 6 years at over 100 million, we would be stuck for those entire 6 years. NO, NO AND NO AGAIN to Holliday or Lackey. I am open to Bay if the Sox don't sign him, we need power right so get actual power... Holliday is not power.
Posted by: MetsvilleSlugger | November 15, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Would Byrnes be worth taking a chance on at this point? Him for Castillo straight up seems like a wash of bad contracts, although Byrnes has only 1 year left on his, and his injury history would allow F Mart (if healthy) to get regular playing time.
Posted by: indient | November 16, 2009 at 03:37 AM
what about uggla to the mets.he doesnt have the best defense but he is a 2nd basemen with power and the marlins are looking to open up some cap space.
Posted by: bill godfrey | November 19, 2009 at 03:26 PM