![]() |
|
|
| |
« Tellem Discusses Rich Harden | Main | Yankees May Let Chien-Ming Wang Leave »
Paul Sullivan of the Chicago Tribune takes a look at the Milton Bradley situation in an article this morning.
Sullivan, like many, sees the Rangers as the favorite. Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News looks at all the factors there.
Giants GM Brian Sabean was quizzed about a possible bad contract swap for Bradley, and shot down the idea. The Mets and Rays appear in the mix to a certain extent, with Omar Minaya even admitting he'll talk to Jim Hendry about it. Luis Castillo figures to be in that discussion, but Sullivan says reports suggest Mets ownership may be anti-Bradley.
ESPN's Bruce Levine adds more detail. He says Hendry spent over an hour Monday with the Rays discussing a Bradley-Pat Burrell swap, with the $12MM salary difference a key. A similar gap exists with Kevin Millwood, who Levine believes the Rangers would "gladly" swap for Bradley. However, Levine says the Rangers will only take about $4MM of Bradley's contract at this point.
A few other notes from Sullivan: the Cubs remain fans of Marlon Byrd, who is now a free agent. That interest suggests that the Cubs' "left-handed bat" obsession from a year ago has gone by the boards. Sullivan also mentions that the Cubs "are in no hurry to open up talks with Derrek Lee on a contract extension." Lee will earn $13MM in 2010 in the last year of his contract.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

|
|
"Sullivan's read that Mets ownership may be anti-Bradley"
And, uh, the fans too.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | November 11, 2009 at 11:34 AM
Yeah but a 3 team trade with the Mets Rays cand Cubs could work.
1.Cubs get Castillo
2.Mets get Burell who can be used mostly off the bench and then we could finally sign Hudson.
3. Rays get Bradley and Cash.
Posted by: supersteve1492 | November 11, 2009 at 11:38 AM
"A few other notes from Sullivan: the Cubs remain fans of Marlon Byrd, who is now a free agent. That interest suggests that the Cubs' "left-handed bat" obsession from a year ago has gone by the boards."
While Bradley was coming off a high OBP & OPS year, he is not the 'left handed run producer' Hendry was telling fans. Add to the fact lefty Fonteno was given 2B when he is clearly not an everyday player. I would like the line up to have another lefty. That does not mean they had to misevaluate just for the sake of being left handed.
"Sullivan also mentions that the Cubs "are in no hurry to open up talks with Derrek Lee on a contract extension." Lee will earn $13MM in 2010 in the last year of his contract."
Nor should they talk about a new deal. Plan ahead and move on after 2010 at 1B.
Posted by: studio179 | November 11, 2009 at 11:45 AM
"Sullivan says reports suggest Mets ownership may be anti-Bradley."
Bradley in New York? I would not wish that even on him.
Posted by: studio179 | November 11, 2009 at 11:48 AM
...fans would have a field day.
Posted by: studio179 | November 11, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Bradley would have as much success in New York as he did in Chicago. He can't cope with the pressure of a big media market.
I proposed this in the thread about the Reds trading Phillips, etc. yesterday.
Bradley (owed $21MM thru 2011)
Fox (owed $401k)
Fontenot (owed 430k)
for
Phillips (owed $18MM thru 2011)
Cordero (owed $25MM thru 2011)
Reds dump a ton (nearly 20 million) in salary and get a pair of power hitters and a speedy second baseman. Bradley, who is bound to have a bounce-back year, can't cry racism with Dusty as his manager (like he did with Lou in Chicago) and can cope a lot better with the small-market Cincy scene. Cubs get some much-needed experience and durability in the bullpen with Cordero and a power-hitting second baseman with above-average defense and speed in Phillips.
Posted by: CubsWin? | November 11, 2009 at 11:51 AM
Burrell would not be the answer in LF for the Mets. I rather just keep Castillo at that point. Burrell as a bench bat would be fine though.
Posted by: Baseball Nut | November 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Cubswin?, No one wants Bradley. People in the Reds front office may be dumb but not dumb enough to get Bradley. Plus, The Reds have a ton of OF prospects in the minors that could get the call next year. Bradley would just be wasting space. Also, I don't think the Reds would want to help out the Cubs.
Posted by: Ethanator99 | November 11, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Hypothetical question: if the Cubs put Bradley on waivers and anyone could have him for the minimum, who would take him?
By late spring training this question may no longer be hypothetical. And Bradley should ask Larry Johnson, KC running back, about the experience.
Posted by: pmc765 | November 11, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Ok, yeah, this seems to be more realistic as far as suitors go.
TEX - possibly the most likely destination, but its still a questionable fit. They cant add payroll so they will need Hendry to eat a large chunk of the cost. Yet Hendry seems unwilling to do so.
SF - apparently not interest
TB - extremely unlikely, as we know they want the ability to release him at any time with no financial hit and the Cubs dont want to pick up mush of the money owed.
NYM - owner possibly to squash deal (and realistically, thats the right thing for everyone involved. Bradley claims this years issues started with media scrutiny. And you can bet the NY media is licking their lips already over possibly getting their hands on him)
TOR - New GM (AA) rumored to be uninterested in him
SD - Towers said he might be interested in him again. But Towers isnt there anymore. However, DePodesta is and Paul was the GM who in LA during Bradley's turbulent time there.
All these "multiple suitors" reports going around seem to be getting exposed quite a bit now, and the more realistic "limited options" outcome is floating to the surface.
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 11, 2009 at 12:17 PM
ethanator-maybe if you type that no one wants bradley enough times (i.e., in every milton bradley post), it'll come true? rosenthal, the chicago writers, evan grant from dallas, the rays...hell even omar minaya practially admitted to some level of interest. but please, keep telling yourself (and all of us) that no one wants him.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | November 11, 2009 at 12:20 PM
1. @supersteve: Luis Castillo is absolutely horrendous. I would rather the Cubs eat Bradley's contract and then some. He is a terrible defender and someone unable to hit for an extra base hit to save his life.
2. @CubsWin: The Reds have looked to keep Cordero. And why would they trade 2 All-Star caliber players for a terrible attitude, a terrible fielder, and a terrible starter? HORRIBLE TRADE for Cincy.
3. Bradley won't go to waivers because the Cubs have no interest in eating the majority of the contract.
With that, if the Cubs WERE to eat a giant chunk of money, I would want them to get a good player in return. They should be able to get Crawford or Upton if they eat Bradley's contract (maybe $15 million of his money) and add a prospect or 2. They Rays know they can't pay both Crawford and Upton.
Oh, and with Lee: he should get a 1- or 2-year extension. Someone a while back suggested the Cubs get Rammy work at 1B, then move him there in a few years when Vitters is ready.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 11, 2009 at 12:26 PM
So, no one wants Bradley, but it looks pretty plain that someone is going to get him, because he sure as hell isn't staying in Chicago. If he does, we can call it 102 and counting right now.
Bradley and a package of others (maybe Fox, Fontenot, Koyie Hill) to the...
Braves for Kelly Johnson and Derek Lowe
Mets for Luis Castillo and Jeff Francoeur
White Sox for Alex Rios and a prospect or two
I dunno... I'm just trying to come up with ways we could get rid of this guy - would be nice to send him to the White Sox, though... it'd be like intentionally giving the flu to that prick who works across the hall from you
Posted by: CubsWin? | November 11, 2009 at 12:33 PM
I cant imagine anyone wanting that malcontent Milton Bradley. He seemed to fit in w/ Texas but that was probably just his contract year.
Posted by: WindyCityWarrioe | November 11, 2009 at 12:41 PM
"Braves for Kelly Johnson and Derek Lowe"
The Braves could trade Lowe, eating a tiny bit of cash, and receive a solid to top-prospect. No chance they trade Lowe and Johnson for nothing more then Bradley.
"Mets for Luis Castillo and Jeff Francoeur"
Did you not read the part where Mets Ownership is apparently unwilling to bring him to NY? (also, keep Francoeur the hell away from Chicago - Castillo/Bradley straight swap is enough. Saves the Cubs 10MM and fills 2B. Thats a fine solution.
"White Sox for Alex Rios and a prospect or two"
0 chance he goes to CHICAGO after being removed from the Cubs because he is unable to handle being in CHICAGO. KW isnt that stupid.
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM
-- SuzysMan - I think you are giving too much credit to Lowe. The Braves are going to need to eat 25% or more just to move him with nothing coming back. I could see Bradley + $5m for Lowe or Bradley + impact young talent for Lowe.
-- The Cubs wouldn't want Rios. Why make the problem worse by taking on more annual salary and a longer contract term.
-- The Cubs would be ecstatic if someone claimed Bradley. No one though is going to pay the full freight on the guy. The question has always been "how much" will the Cubs need to kick in (dollars and/or prospects) to make Bradley palatable.
-- There is NO WAY the Cubs get Crawford or Upton in a deal with Bradley. Look - it's real simple. Plenty of GM's would take Bradley if the deal means they are paying between $2-4m/year. That would mean the Cubs eat $14-18m. That doesn't net you anything back that is worth anything. That is just getting Bradley off the books without having to eat his entire contract. To suggest that the Rays would somehow just throw in Crawford of Upton is absurd.
-- There is absolutely no reason to release this guy. Someone will take him with enough money being included. Or you take back another bad contract and hope that the player can turn things around. In either situation it is far better than just eating his contract through a release.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 11, 2009 at 01:49 PM
"-- SuzysMan - I think you are giving too much credit to Lowe. The Braves are going to need to eat 25% or more just to move him with nothing coming back. I could see Bradley + $5m for Lowe or Bradley + impact young talent for Lowe."
If you think Bradley + Impact Young Talent = Lowe then I am not giving him too much credit at all.
Just look at Scott Kazmir. Sean Rodriguez, Matthew Sweeney and Alex Torres for a lesser pitcher on a similar yearly salary (if the Braves eat about 2MM per year)
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 11, 2009 at 02:04 PM
so far. the giants are the smartest team about this.
Posted by: dodgers_suck | November 11, 2009 at 03:17 PM
NEWSFLASH!!!! The Cubs aren't going to get a "good" player for Bradley. The only thing they will get is another under achiever with a fat bad contract. Just let him go to the team willing to pick up the largest amount of his contract and move on.
Posted by: matt_g3 | November 11, 2009 at 03:45 PM
Hendry doesn't know how to negotiate contracts and has a history of signing Type A & B players over market, ie. Soriano, Bradley most recent. Cubs fans can only hope that Ricketts will get involved and provide some business sense in the contract negotiations.
The Cubs aren't in a position to start negotiating contracts for Lee, Lilly or any other player who's contract expires at the end of 2010. The new owner needs to settle a spring training for 2011, hire positions as he stated, set in motion the Wrigley renovations. Realistically with contracts expiring and the economy as it is and the renovations needed it doesn't seem like too many contracts will be extended. If the Cubs are in a similar situation 2010 as they were in 2009 then as a fan we should hope the Cubs mngmt trades the expiring contracts to get some low level prospects to rebuild a minor league system that is one of the worsts in MLB. If they are in contention then short contracts being extended to those players are more realistic than long term.
Posted by: ricdik | November 11, 2009 at 04:25 PM
NEWSFLASH!!!! This year is going to BLOW!! AND IT PISSES ME OFF, but lets just call a spade a spade...Im ready to just trade him for some cool rims or water pick.
Posted by: Serio_Nipples | November 11, 2009 at 05:40 PM
NEWS FLASH...NEW YORK WANTS MILTON BRADLEY!
That's the Bellevue Hospital mental ward, of course. He fits perfectly in their storied line-up.
Posted by: HoratioAlgae | November 14, 2009 at 08:49 AM