« D'Backs Search For Pitching |
Main
| Trade Market: Starting Pitchers »
By Tim Dierkes [November 12, 2009 at 4:15pm CST]
Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star dishes on the Royals...
- Dayton Moore...step away from the free agent market. The Royals are moving toward trades, with an eye on the long-term. Owner David Glass says the plan is to "turn over some of the club." Moore already made a nice move in flipping Mark Teahen for Josh Fields and Chris Getz.
- Dutton again mentions the talks between the Dodgers and Royals on a possible A.J. Ellis for Alberto Callaspo deal. Ellis, 29 in April, posted OBPs over .436 in Triple A for 2008-09.
- The Royals are probably stuck with Jose Guillen, but David DeJesus and Gil Meche could be trade chips. Dutton says the Royals prefer to keep Meche though.
- Dutton says the Royals are more likely to trade for a center fielder than to re-sign Coco Crisp.
- Via Twitter, Dutton says lefty Lenny DiNardo and reliever Yasuhiko Yabuta elected free agency.
I would think Callaspo would net more than a backup cactcher. Dude's got a million dollar bat but a nickel glove.
DeJesus would be a great piece to a contending team. Not flashy but is consistent year in and year out. Maybe a team like the Yankees if they dont' resign MAtsui or Damon for one of their young catchers or even to the D-Backs for Conor Jackson. He fits into Moore's love of high power low OBP, and it would be a good buy low candidate for the Royals.
Posted by: Trusting the Process | November 12, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Until MLB has some sort of salary cap the Royals will forever suck.
So essentially nothing that Dayton Moore does matters.
Posted by: Hellion | November 12, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Agreed on DeJesus. I always liked his play. He is not a great or flashy player, but solid.
Posted by: studio179 | November 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Not good - KC just a AAAA team. Salary dump every four years. 2010 fifth place 64 wins book it.
Sad for a great baseball town.
Posted by: rockford | November 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Callaspo had a huge 2009 - .300/.356/.457. His defense took a dip last year, but obviously if the Dodgers could really get him for a backup catcher who couldn't manage a single HR in nearly 300 at-bats in the PCL, they do that deal.
Posted by: vtadave | November 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM
"Until MLB has some sort of salary cap the Royals will forever suck.
So essentially nothing that Dayton Moore does matters."
Teams with medium to small payrolls compete every year, while top tier teams in terms of payroll flounder. Good management and ownership can put winning teams on the field cheaply if they have the ability and foresight required. The Royals--like the Pirates and a few others--seem to lack any understand of whats needed on the field or how it can be acquired at discounted rates. Simply capping player salaries would do nothing but insure the profitability of owners who are already making money hand over fist while crying poverty to get stadiums built at taxpayer expense. The Royals would still be awful with a cap, just more valuable.
Posted by: Mule | November 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM
i challege anyone to help me understand callaspo for ellis.
exciting young second baseman with major league success.
in exchange for...
career minor league catcher.
honestly? this is a serious proposal?
well ok, then the cubs should offer a bag of balls for callaspo if thats all its really taking. and heck, we'll throw fontenot in there as a replacement for callaspo... seriously?!
Posted by: rootman1010 | November 12, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Mule - Well said. A good craftsman doesn't blame the tool if his work isn't up to his standards. Similarly a well run baseball team wouldn't have to cry about payroll.
Posted by: pageian | November 12, 2009 at 11:23 AM
New Slogan for 2010
Kansas City Royals Baseball "Where On Base Percentage and Former Crappy Braves players go to die"
Posted by: Trusting the Process | November 12, 2009 at 11:25 AM
It pisses me off when people still compare the Pirates to the Royals. This is not 2007 people, where the Pirates would trade prospects for expensive veteran arms like Matt Morris! This is 2009! Get your facts straight.
The Pirates are rebuilding, trading away veterans for youngsters. At least they are doing it right. The Pirates are closer to competing than the Royals. So quit comparing the two now.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | November 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM
I do agree, however, that trading away a young 2B that can hit (albeit not play defense), is not a good move.
Moore needs to learn how to maximize his players values.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | November 12, 2009 at 12:02 PM
I believe that Callaspo is being discussed to the Dodgers and that Ellis could be involved as well. I also know it is very easy to bash Moore and some of his moves. However, I think there is more to this potential deal then Callaspo for Ellis straight up. Dodgers would have already done it already and laughed all the way to spring training if that were the case.
Either a pitcher like Bannister is being talked about in a bigger deal, or there is at least another player to be sent with Ellis to KC.
The only sure thing is that Callaspo is a productive, minimum salary player, that should be of interest to the Dodgers as well as teams like maybe the Tigers to replace Polanco.
Posted by: bigscott | November 12, 2009 at 12:03 PM
good point bigscott,
Moving Bannister with Callaspo would defenity work well. I would love it for Bannister as he has shown levels of brilliance which i am sure would maintain themselves better in the NL. Not sure what else the cubs would give up, but Bannister would definetly be a solid #3 starter for them plus an all around great guy.
Posted by: BaseBallz | November 12, 2009 at 12:09 PM
That is the most rational post on this thread, bigscott. Ellis isn't the only piece going to come back, so everybody calm down.
Posted by: revive85 | November 12, 2009 at 12:11 PM
You guys so sure that it wouldn't be a Callaspo/Ellis straight up swap? This is Dayton Moore we're talking about. He traded away the Royals best pitching prospect for Yuneisky Betancourt, mind you.
Posted by: TwinRoyals | November 12, 2009 at 01:40 PM
Small market teams seem to compete every year with smaller payrolls then the Royals. If MLB adopted a salary cap, it still wouldn't matter, because the bottom line is decision-making. Management has to make better decisions; as well as ownership. It starts from the top and works its way down. You have to draft better. Instead of drafting Mike Stodolka, draft Chase Utly. The draft is a complete crap shoot, and everything is second guessed, but until the Royals start making better decisions, they will continue to play this poorly.
Posted by: royalsfan4life | November 12, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Yeah, what TwinRoyals said. The Mariners probably threw a party for the kid and laughed big time at the Royals. Betancourt is a terrible defensive shortstop, an (at best) average bat with no power, has no speed, horrid obp, even more horrid slugging percentage, and a terrible ops. He'll give you a double every now and then. That's about it.
But the Royals found it necessary to pony up and trade away a future major league PITCHER for him. Heck, even if he went back to batting .280, you still can't justify the trade since he is terrible in every other area.
Posted by: BaseballFan0707 | November 12, 2009 at 05:09 PM
Small market teams win, but the Vegas odds on them winning are always smaller or most often smaller than large market teams like the Yankees. A bad year for the Yanks is to not make the second round of the playoffs. While a good year for a small market team is to make the playoffs. A salary-cap would not be save-all that MLB needs, but it would level the free agent playing field a little.
Posted by: ChiefsNfl | November 12, 2009 at 05:26 PM
all a salary cap would do is keep player salaries down. You would still see the big time stars playing for the Yanks, Red Sox, Dodgers and Cubs, to name a few. They just wouldn't get paid as much.
Posted by: BaseballFan0707 | November 12, 2009 at 06:27 PM