Email a copy of 'NL Notes: Hellweg, Cuddyer, Cubs, Espinosa' to a friend
Loading ...
By Jeff Todd | at
Email a copy of 'NL Notes: Hellweg, Cuddyer, Cubs, Espinosa' to a friend
MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com
hide arrows scroll to top
calabio
Hope cubs take Hoffman What does everyone else think?
Scott Dowell
Might be time for MLBTR to create a Tommy John tracker that follows both those currently on the DL and those who have resumed their careers
MB923
Haha, said the same thing in another post. Seems like every week another 2 or 3 players need it.
LazerTown
I think you should usually take the best player anyways. You can get into a sticky situation when you are trying to draft to fill a need. Take the player you think will work out, so many prospects wash out that you don’t need to risk them on someone you don’t think was best, but fit your position. Bryant looks really good, but many prospects will take 3+ years to make it to the majors and many also end up moving positions, that it’s really hard to draft for your need.
Tko11
Well said, in the NFL drafting based on need is fine but in baseball it is better to just draft the best overall talent.
Alex Andreopoulos
Indeed. Same with the NBA, and to a lesser extent the NHL. But in the MLB a team should always just draft based on potential – regardless of position.
justinept
Exactly. You take the best player available even if he doesn’t fill a need in the system. If he projects as expected, then you can always trade him at a later date for a player that DOES fill a need.
Trock
I completely agree in baseball. It is kind of weird how in most other sports, kids out of college (and sometimes even out of HS) can have a huge impact at the big state of their given sport. But with baseball, it’s almost true that every player (with exceptions of course) take a few seasons of fine tuning things.
burnboll
It’s weird that Lebron James makes less money from his team than Ryan Howard.
burnboll
Hey bro, what do you think of the last couple of years of the draft in the top ten? I can only think of one blatant miss, and that’s Bubba Starling, who Kansas City way over slotted.
But other than that, most picks have been pretty logical, and teams going for quality instead of position and/or sentimental value.
burnboll
Is Johnny Hellweg in some way related to the late great Ultimate Warrior?
Hills of Glenallen
No. His name was Jim Hellwig, not Hellweg. Well, then his name was Warrior, but anyway.
burnboll
Such a tragedy what happened to Ultimate warrior. I guess it’s good for Johnny he’s not related in this case.
Rip Jim.
Hills of Glenallen
Not much you can do about a bad heart. Had a history of it in his family. Plus his past drug abuse couldn’t have helped much. So long Warrior.
raymondrobertkoenig
Some think the BPA for the Cubs will be a pitcher. Time will tell.
justinept
It probably will be. Between Rodon, Aiken, Hoffman, Kolek, Beede and a few others, it sure looks like the top players in this draft are all pitchers. There is still a chance the Cubs go with Jackson, though. They’ve scouted him extensively, and he reportedly looked quite impressive during his visit to Wrigley.
Pei Kang
ugh. Another injury to a young player…this has got to stop 🙁
BYOP
What’s that like 20 pitchers already this year that have had or about to have Tommy John surgery?
MB923
If that’s true, I’m sure #21 will be announced by the end of the day, if not then by the end of the week.
DarthMurph
The Rockies’ have a lot of leverage with Cuddyer. If he has a pretty good year, he’ll get the QO. No reason to extend him now. They’ll likely want to negotiate a 2-3 year deal for him before that’s offered though.
SwingtimeInTheRockies
He’s 35 so 36 next season. If the QO is $15mil next year, that’s probably too much to offer and a pretty safe bet that Cuddy would take it. If he has another big season this year, I’d definitely talk extension but otherwise, it would be fine to let Cuddy test the market.
daveineg
Tough news for the hard throwing but command challenged Hellweg. From Brewer perspective though, losing your 9th or 10th guy on the starter depth chart, is a lot better than what many teams are dealing with. Maybe it is their year.
Balboa
The BPA at #4 is going to be a pitcher anyways. The first 5 picks might all be pitchers this year.
Butch Crassidy
I think the best bet is to stockpile talent, provided you’re not loading your team at one or two positions. Ideally, the Cubs take a pitcher, but the MLB draft is unlike drafts in the other major pro sports, in which it is much easier to predict value at a particular draft slot.
Balboa
I don’t think Cub fans need to worry this year. Currently BBA’s top 15 has 12 pitchers, two OF’s and a SS. The Cubs are not taking Nick Gordon SS at #4 even if they think he’s BPA, and I’m not entirely sure C/OF Alex Jackson will even make it to #4.
Theo would have to go outta his way not to take a pitcher with 1.04 this year.
Butch Crassidy
In this year’s draft, yes, it would be hard for Theo and Co. to not take a pitcher with the 4th pick. Unlike last year’s draft, this year’s draft will likely not see more than half of the first 15, 16 picks be position players. However, there are a few guys like Gettys, Zimmer and more than likely, Alex Jackson, who could be at least remotely appealing to the Cubs. With that said, I believe the Cubs will ultimately take a pitcher at #4.
tesseract
Dr. Andrews must be pocketing nice change
burnboll
I’m not sure he’s paid per surgery. He could very well have a monthly salary.
tesseract
Dr. Andrews does not have a monthly salary with every MLB organization out there. I’m pretty sure he gets paid per surgery. A TJ surgery is upward 20K. Sure there costs associated with it but I’m sure Dr. A pockets nice money on every procedure