Email a copy of 'This Week's 5 Key Stories' to a friend
Loading ...
By charliewilmoth | at
Email a copy of 'This Week's 5 Key Stories' to a friend
MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com
hide arrows scroll to top
Ed Charles
How hilarious is it now that Boston didn’t want to part with Swihart to get Hamels
aggee10
The phillies wanted more than swihart….
josc2
Wanted WAY more than Swihart
jleve618
He has done preeeettyyy well with a good team behind him.
Michael Macaulay-Birks
According to Hamels himself, the Phillies never even approach him with a deal to waive his no trade to Boston, so it was never even a thing
bross16
Probably because Boston said no
chesteraarthur
Um, not at all? Philly wanted Betts too. Who is better, cheaper, and under control longer than Hamels.
ThatGuy 2
I’m pretty sure they wanted betts and Swihart along with other prospects
youcannnnnputitontheboard
I would say that injuries would be a top story this week.
bsteady powers
That’s not the first time I’ve heard someone talk trash about not reading Swihart for Hamels. I would imagine it was the combo of prospects that was denied. And Isn’t Swihart injured? Not a busy. Yet, at least. Prospects rarely come up and Are Kris Bryant. It takes a ear or 2 or another trip to AAA.!
youcannnnnputitontheboard
translation?