I was wondering the same thing. I also wonder why he’s listed as a 1B when he has more games in the OF. I wonder if that’s part of the problem.
djskilbr
Thanks John. Love your work, by the way. If you guys ever need writing/research help, please let me know.
I don’t think that’s the problem; because 1b and OF’s are already grouped together. I think there had to just be a miscalculation there. Because he’s consistently been one of the highest ranked Type A FA’s all year. And I still suspect that will be the case in the end as well. The real question at this point, for the Twins’ FA’s, is if Kubel plays well enough down the stretch to re-reach Type A status. I hope he does, because I think both he and Cuddyer are very signable even as Type A’s (Cuddyer for his marketability/good year/righthanded power bat and Kubel for his talent and age relative to the market).
Comments for this post have been closed by the site administrator.
John Bonnes
I was wondering the same thing. I also wonder why he’s listed as a 1B when he has more games in the OF. I wonder if that’s part of the problem.
djskilbr
Thanks John. Love your work, by the way. If you guys ever need writing/research help, please let me know.
I don’t think that’s the problem; because 1b and OF’s are already grouped together. I think there had to just be a miscalculation there. Because he’s consistently been one of the highest ranked Type A FA’s all year. And I still suspect that will be the case in the end as well. The real question at this point, for the Twins’ FA’s, is if Kubel plays well enough down the stretch to re-reach Type A status. I hope he does, because I think both he and Cuddyer are very signable even as Type A’s (Cuddyer for his marketability/good year/righthanded power bat and Kubel for his talent and age relative to the market).