Email a copy of 'The 6 Most Surprising Trades Of The Offseason' to a friend
Loading ...
By Tim Dierkes | at
Email a copy of 'The 6 Most Surprising Trades Of The Offseason' to a friend
MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com
hide arrows scroll to top
AndreTheGiantKiller
Don’t even suggest trading Kenley… Don’t give Ned any ideas!
Guest 5390
lets see what the ‘stache tells him to do
CAD_Monkey
Let Ned test the market…we don’t have enough utility infielders or back up catchers for the competitive NL West.
redsx968
The more I look at that Ianetta-Chatwood deal it looks better and better for the Rockies lol
Derek Lee
I agree with these picks.
Lefty
I can’t believe that Dana Eveland to the Orioles for Jarret Martin and Tyler Henson trade didn’t garner some consideration. It was not only surprising, but shocking and appalling as well.
I mean Duquette stated that Eveland won in the really difficult and tenacious Albuquerque League. So that would mean winning for Eveland in the AL East should be no problemo!
As a side note Showalter said something similar about Kevin Gregg last year. This is paraphrased, Kevin Gregg pitched for both Mike Scioscia and Lou Pinella, so that must mean he’s a good pitcher. Umm no, it simply means that he pitched for two good managers. It didn’t mean he pitched well!
PS Chris Iannetta from Rockies for Tyler Chatwood was dumb on Dipoto’s part!
start_wearing_purple
Just for the record… Have any of your posts not been about the Orioles?
Dynasty22
Well if he doesn’t talk about them, who will?
start_wearing_purple
Zing.
Fifty_Five
It’s not surprising because no one cares
John
More like the 6 trades of the offseason.
RepOak
Surprised Pujols to angels isn’t on this list
RepOak
I know he wasn’t a trade but it was still surprising
vtadave
Is it really surprising to you that a free agent signing wasn’t on a post regarding surprising trades?
deere5800
It’s the six most surprising trades
Cameron Morgan
How about the Derek Lowe trade, even though he was in his last year of his contract, it still seemed to be an untradeable player.
M_Harden
Not really. The Braves had been rumored to be shopping him and they also ate most of his salary, as expected.
Kevin Chambers
We knew he was being shopped around though, it was just a surprise that it was the Indians who acquired him. Not that he was actually traded.
Cameron Morgan
Being a Braves fan and watching him struggle all year, barely making it to 5 innings before really falling apart, and that he was traded so early in the offseason was what made it so surprising. The Braves had been trying to trade him since the end of the first year of the contract. It took 3 offseasons to finally get something done.
vtadave
Yeah he was far more movable this offseason than three offseasons ago. 1 yr / 5 million for an innings-eater with still-soli peripherals.
the_insomniac
Was sad to see Nestor Molina leave. I do believe he has a higher upside than what some of the experts project. Not an ace, but a good 2-3 starter.
But I can’t complain about acquiring Santos. He seems like a stand up guy and I hope he does well in Toronto.
Lunchbox45
How about Jeff Mathis for Brad Mills ?
you know, the fact that someone actually traded for Jeff Mathis.
M_Harden
Anthopoulos too.
rikersbeard
he’s an adequate backup catcher with solid defensive skills. Mills didn’t really have much of a place in the jays system. AA got what he wanted for a backup and made room on the 40 man roster in doing it.
johnsmith4
was going to say the same about Mills…oh well…maybe we shouldn’t be surprised
jumpsuitjohnny
The longer the Latos trade settles in, the more reasonable it sounds from Cincy’s point of view. At first I was stunned at the amount talent and potential they gave up. However, really with the exception of Boxberger all of the players were expendable to the Reds regardless of how talented they were. And if Latos stabilizes an otherwise shaky rotation for those four years he is under contract control it will more than pay for itself.
markr
i thought you were gonna say “if Latos stabilizes his [makeup issues]”, which is very telling from a padre perspective.
eyeglass1
It’s all WHAT if’s for the kids that San Diego acquired. Latos, no matter, if he stays as good as he’s been, then that’s a pretty good starter. You don’t know if Alonso can keep healthy or hit a slow curve yet over a prolonged season. And, seriously, I think Boxberger COULD be a closer but those guys are a lot more common then an ACE in your rotation.
start_wearing_purple
It’s kinda funny that you say what San Diego got were a bunch of “what ifs” and then basically admit Latos is also a “what if.”
markr
the more i think about the trade, the more i think it was also about getting latos out of the clubhouse before the young guys come up from the minors. when buddy black is asked about tim stauffer all he has to say is good things, and that stauffer prepares and goes about pitching like a pro. i’m thinking they wanted the kids coming up to be influenced by stauffer instead of latos.
start_wearing_purple
Was Latos that much of a problem? And if that’s the issue then why trade for Voloquez who’s already had a 50-game suspension.
The first I heard of the compensation for Latos I thought the Reds had made a massively desperate overpayment. However after realizing the Reds picked up a 24 year old with four years of team control with top of the rotation ability I had to think they paid a fair price and with the changes in Central it could be prime time for them to take over.
Though I think the Pads got more than question marks. Voloquez could be a solid back of the rotation starter in San Diego and if Alonso can do for a full year what he did in 88 ABs last year then the Pads have gotten back the production they lost when trading away Gonzalez.
markr
the more i think about the trade, the more i think it was also about getting latos out of the clubhouse before the young guys come up from the minors. when buddy black is asked about tim stauffer all he has to say is good things, and that stauffer prepares and goes about pitching like a pro. i’m thinking they wanted the kids coming up to be influenced by stauffer instead of latos.
Jeremy Weaver
As a Cubs fan, I can’t help but notice that as you say, Rizzo becomes expendable and clearly the Cubs front office has some interest in Rizzo. Maybe Rizzo for Garza has been discussed as a jumping off point.
Jeremy Weaver
Of course, there are a lot of other potential suitors for Garza so maybe the Padres and Cubs are looking for a third party. Rizzo to the Cubs, Garza to the third team and some need-filling pieces or prospects to the Padres and maybe the Cubs as well. Any thoughts? That might explain why it’s taking so long to move Garza…
tds18
Padres won’t wanna trade Rizzo for a suspect starter. The advantage of not having to trade Rizzo in the Quentin deal is the Padres ability to use him as trade bait for acquiring a solid middle infielder.
IndianaBob
Garza is not a suspect starter. Tied for 12th among all pitchers in WAR last year. His career year so far, but he will probably be at least a low end #1 this year as I would put him among the top 30 starters.
Mario El Capitan Raccuglia
not the gio gonzalez trade?
Alex Mejia
#6 was a surprise, a pleasant one. From our end it’s brilliant and people don’t want to realize it. Chatwood’s high walk rate + altitude, I just don’t see it, 6 years of control or not.
Then we get rid of Jeff Mathis. He’s a nice backup option yes, but he was never going to be that in Anaheim. Chris Iannetta improves the offensive catching situation while providing better defense than Mathis. It may only be one year, but that might be all the Angels need, they have Hank Conger waiting in the wings.