Email a copy of 'MLBTR Mailbag: Buchholz, Giants Pen, Dozier, Melancon' to a friend
Loading ...
By Jeff Todd | at
Email a copy of 'MLBTR Mailbag: Buchholz, Giants Pen, Dozier, Melancon' to a friend
MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com
hide arrows scroll to top
Sutter
Totally didn’t answer the Dozier question.
Jeff Todd
I respectfully disagree.
The trade return question is posed often, and I dislike responses on the order of: “one top X prospect and another Y type prospect.” That’s just nonsense, most of the time, and I say that with the knowledge that I’ve probably used it as a crutch myself. Not only is it all dependent upon individual teams’ scouting assessments, trade talks take place in a fluid market situation that involves multiple teams and also free agents. And prospect valuation isn’t as simple as checking the rankings. We could discuss specific prospects w/r/t a specific trade target, but obviously that wasn’t presented here.
So, I find the whole idea of “expected return” to be largely a misnomer. Instead of making something up, I addressed his points regarding Dozier’s value given his overall profile and the context of his big campaign. I suppose I could’ve run through the entire league thinking of teams that could pursue him, but I think that’s best saved for later. Plus, I just added a note on that: I think he’s good enough of an asset that he doesn’t need to be chased by teams looking to fill in at a position.
Kayrall
I totally understand what you are saying and your decision process for the response. But, there were 2 questions:
1) What would an expected return for him be?
2) How many teams will even be in the market for a defensive deficient 2nd baseman with a little pop in his bat?
In the response, neither was answered. You did address your decision making process above and I completely respect that, but if you did not want to provide hypotheticals that are just guesses and conjecture, perhaps this question should not have been included.
I love MLBTR and read this site religiously. Similar to the mild complaints in the Live Chats, people are not necessarily looking for an analysis of the player or situation but instead something more quantifiable. Because that is omitted and those two types of answers are drastically different, people feel that the question was not answered and feel frustrated and/or annoyed.
I want to close by saying that I totally respect you, Jeff, Tim, and the others as you guys provide the best baseball coverage of any outlet on the planet. In no way am I taking a shot at you guys or your work, but simply trying to effectively communicate constructive criticism that others have brought up in the past.
Dookie Howser, MD
Rabble, rabble, rabble!
srechter
Politely well stated, my friend! The question wasn’t answered as it was posed, but justification for that augmented answer was clearly given. What’s to argue here? He could have simply picked a different question, but at least felt the need to comment upon Dozier’s percieved value. What is lost on me is the first commenter’s response insinuating some injustice had been done with that answer. I mean, what now?
Jeff Todd
Always happy to discuss these things in a constructive manner! The mailbag, like the chats (but on a different timeline for answering), presents challenges because so many of the questions we get are difficult to answer. I’m looking for stuff that I can offer something on — not just a factual yes/no, and not something so broad that it deserves a full post. (“What is [team x] looking to do this winter?”)
So, in this case I decided to take off of the original question — which I left as asked rather than modifying it — to give some thoughts on the subject. I realize I didn’t directly answer it, strictly speaking, but I feel that I covered the ground that I was comfortable with in answering the question, if that makes sense.
A'sfaninUK
With Mauer entrenched at 1B and with the Twins large amount of DH options, it would not surprise me to see a team trade for Dozier with the eye of moving him to 1B, being that there’s too many quality 2B defenders out there and his bat is playing as a traditional 1B, plus his turning 30 next year will most likely be the start of him having to look to move anyway.
With their prospects, Boston could easily get him and move him to 1B and Hanley to DH. Looking at both 1B and 2B landing spots, he’s also a great fit for the Mets, Yankees, Dodgers (if they move Utley to bench), Rockies (imagine him at 1B in Denver?) or Rangers (same thing as Rockies). Being that he’s on a cheap 2/15 deal right now, I think he’d bring in 2 of any of those teams top 5 prospects plus another piece or two. He’s the kind of guy youd want to lock up too.
badco44
The problem with Dozier is the same problem with Encarcion… Both right handed and that would make the Boston lineup too righty.. Check it out guys, still say the obvious answer in Boston is Sam Travis.. Platooning with Travis Shaw at first and Moncada and fat boy at third.. If your hung with him you might as well see it thru !
BoldyMinnesota
But they would fit in with that short porch in left. That park is meant for them
A'sfaninUK
Dozier has a .870 OPS against righties and .999 OPS against lefties, you throw R/L lineup splits out the window when they’re this good.
krillin
I just hope Dozier does not become the next Dan Uggla. I am a fan of Dozier and I hope his success continues.
A'sfaninUK
Why not? Having 7 excellent seasons at the highest level is nothing to sneeze at. Dozier is at 3 and having 4 more would be quite the career.
They do both have tons in common in body type (although Dozier is slightly smaller and can steal bases but Uggla was a great player for the better part of a decade, that’s plenty to aspire to.
jd396
I don’t think you can really predict Sudden Talent Loss Syndrome.
adyo4552
With the starting pitching market so thin this winter, I’d be shocked if the Sox don’t pick up Buchholz’ option. Not only would he make a reasonably priced back of rotation option, the fact that he’d only be on a one-year deal would make it a very low risk-high reward option. Furthermore, they could always flip him for help elsewhere if they saw a reason to. There are plenty of teams that would gamble on a Buchholz type pedigree/contract combo. He won’t win you the Cy Young award. But he might be a key piece for a team looking for depth.
Dookie Howser, MD
With Pomeranz in the pen for the rest of the season, Bucholz is the odds on favorite for a couple starts in the playoffs. His performance there will go a long way in DD’s decision making process where a great or awful performance will pretty much force his hand one way or the other
adyo4552
I agree that he is in line for playoff starts. However, I think it would be shortsighted to not pick up his option even if he performs subpar in the postseason. Did you see the kind of contract James Shields landed after he couldn’t deliver for KC? Whether DD picks up the option with intent to keep him or to trade him, barring an absolute disaster of a month, he should have his option picked up either way. Then again, what do I know?
Dookie Howser, MD
I hear what you’re saying on the short-sighted part, and I agree with you that at $13mil for the season there is a lot of value to be had there regardless of what happens in October. I’m just thinking that with the Boston media, public perception is a powerful influencer on personnel decisions, and bringing back Buchholz at a not-insignificant salary after two disastrous post-season starts that gets the Red Sox knocked out might be too much for the PR-driven ownership.
jakem59
Apparently you know nothing if you think James Sheilds didn’t deliver for Kansas City.
notagain27
I don’t understand the defensive knocks on Dozier. He would currently the best defensive SS on the Twins roster if he hadn’t been moved to 2B. The pitching staff is brutal and constantly gives up rockets off the bats of the opposition. When the UZR starts incorporating exit velocities into their algorithms, I will definitely buy into that metric.
A'sfaninUK
Being the “best on the team” is pretty meaningless, it just means better than like 2-3 guys, when there’s dozens of overall better defenders out there.
Sky14
The metrics aren’t saying he’s bad just somewhere to average to slightly above, but he’s been quite good from what I’ve seen. Never had reason to complain about his defense.
daver4470
I don’t see any scenario, short of some kind of mental breakdown, where Buchholz’s option is not picked up. The second half has shown that the upside with Clay– he continues to put out quality starts with flashes of excellence — would justify the $13M level; it seems to be about the going rate for a 2 WAR level starter these days. The downside is that he’s a decent but wildly overpaid bullpen piece for a year, as he pitched quite effectively out of the pen when he was demoted from the rotation. The Red Sox can afford to pay a 7th inning guy $13M. It won’t break their back.
And, more significantly, there isn’t a compelling option to fill the back end of the rotation right now in the system (Owens having not stepped up the way they had hoped), and not a lot of free agent starters — let alone marquee starters — that will be on the market.
It’s astonishing that right at this moment, Rick Porcello is a staff ace and Cy Young candidate, and Clay Buchholz has been a more consistant and reliable starter down the stretch than David Price. Up is down, left is right, backwards is forwards…..