Due to particular language in the MLB contract he signed with the Blue Jays prior to Opening Day, Jay Jackson will be a free agent this winter despite lacking the regulation six years of big league service time, Jays Journal’s Eric Treuden writes. This isn’t the first time Jackson has pursued this route, as Treuden notes that Jackson had similar free agent language written into prior contracts with the Brewers and Giants over the last four years.
Players with between three years and six years of service time are usually under team control, via salary arbitration. However, this normal structure is an imperfect fit for players like Jackson, who made his MLB debut at a relatively late age (27) and who have bounced around to several different teams in both North America and Japan. Though 2023 is Jackson’s age-35 season and he has previously pitched in parts of four MLB campaigns from 2015-22, he still only had one year and 105 days of official service time heading into Opening Day. Rather than tie himself to the Blue Jays organization for years to come, Jackson and his representatives arranged a re-entry into the free agent market at the completion of his one-year deal with Toronto.
Over 27 2/3 innings with the Jays, Jackson has looked quite sharp in posting a 2.28 ERA over 27 2/3 innings, as well as a 22.9% strikeout rate and 8.3% walk rate. This performance is all the more impressive considering how Jackson’s focus has been on matters far more important than baseball, as Jackson and his fiancee have been caring for a newborn who came 15 weeks premature. As a result, Jackson has spent time on the family emergency list, and also spend numerous off-days traveling to Utah to be his family.
His son’s health situation is sure to factor into Jackson’s next contractual decision, as it stands to reason that he might prefer to join a team closer to home. That said, Jackson signed with the Blue Jays because he prioritized pitching for a contender, and by all accounts the club has enjoyed Jackson’s contributions both on the field and in the clubhouse, so the Jays figure to have some interest in offering Jackson a new deal.
JoeBrady
I was disappointed that the players didn’t push for to cover this situation. The usual form looks fine, but for guys that never got a shot, because their teams didn’t promote them, or other teams overlooked their talent, they should automatically become a free agent at a given age.
The guy I had in mind was Brasier. He didn’t get a real shot until he was 30. Which meant no free agency until age 36. Had he become a default free agent at age 32, for example, he’d have had a chance to get a multi-year contract. He still wouldn’t have cleared the table, but he might have gotten something like $10M/3.
paosfan
I did read something about a fixed age fa proposal but it was rejected. Players wanted it low and teams want it higher regardless when player started… one size doesn’t fit all the players… ie Soto wants to be fa in mid 20s…
Ted
In theory the rule 5 handles this to some degree, does it not?
mohoney
It does, if the player in question stays in America.
Sid Bream Speed Demon
Why were you disappointed? It affects what, three guys a decade? And specifically not you? I don’t get why you would be disappointed.
JoeBrady
1-I explained the “why” in my post. But just in case it wasn’t clear, I’d like to see some of the fringy players make enough to live a good life, even if the $100M players only make $99M.
2-I don’t know how many players it affects, but I will be glad to make you a wager that it is higher than 3/decade.
3-And 99.9999% of everything that happens in the world doesn’t affect me. But I still like to form opinions on different things.
4-And your last point is a duplicate question to your first point.
rememberthecoop
27.2 innings is way too small a sample size to make any judgment on performance. This is one of the many reasons why relief pitcher’s performances are so inconsistent year over year.
fre5hwind
He’s been good for a small sample size
Dustyslambchops23
So is every good reliever.
bag o ballz
he was good most of his time in SF too – unfortunately he got caught in a roster crunch and ended up the odd man out
terrymesmer
>Jay Jackson will be a free agent this winter despite lacking the regulation six years of big league service time, Jays Journal’s Eric Treuden
The link goes to an article than mentions Jackson but not his status beyond 2023. You should link to this September 12 article by Eric.
jaysjournal.com/posts/blue-jays-fan-favorite-unexp…
Mark Polishuk
The correct link has now been added, I accidentally included the wrong Jays Journal piece
KamKid
I’d gladly see him back in Toronto, but happy for him to be able to have a choice that’s good for his career and his family.
5TUNT1N
This guy made a real impression on giants fans in a great way. Glad he’s having success and wish him nothing but the best! My daughter was born 3lb 13 ounces and had to fight for everything, now she’s a 13 year old about to go into high school so stay in the fight and keep up being a great guy and dad jay!
Scutarointherain
I liked him too. Shame he didn’t stick around, but I’m glad he had a decent year. Hope he has another, a good payday, and most importantly, that his little one turns out alright like yours has! Our daughter arrived 3 weeks early and even that was no fun…
In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani
I will also be a free agent this winter. Can you write something about me as well?