Headlines

  • Royals, Hunter Dozier Agree To Four-Year Extension
  • Giants, Scott Kazmir Agree To Minor League Deal
  • Kelvin Herrera Announces Retirement
  • Braves Extend Brian Snitker
  • Yankees Sign Justin Wilson
  • Braves Sign Jake Lamb
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Billy Butler Agrees To Extension With Royals

By Mike Axisa | January 23, 2011 at 9:31am CDT

SUNDAY, 9:31am: Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star has the financial details of the deal (Twitter link). Butler will earn $3MM in 2011, and $8MM per year from 2012 to 2014. The contract also includes a $2MM signing bonus and a $12.5MM club option for 2015, with a $1MM buyout.

SATURDAY, 8:03pm: The Royals have confirmed the agreement in a press release. It's a four-year contract with a fifth year option for 2015.

10:11am: Billy Butler told MLB.com's Dick Kaegel that he and the Royals have agreed to a four-year, $30MM contract extension. The deal buys out all three of his arbitration-eligible years plus one year of free agency. Butler is represented by Greg Genske of Legacy Sports.

MLBTR's Arbitration Tracker shows that Butler filed for $4.3MM in arbitration earlier this week while the Royals countered with $3.4MM. Kansas City recently picked up an extra $12.4MM when Gil Meche unexpectedly retired.

Butler, 25 in April, has hit .309/.375/.480 with 36 homers over the last two seasons. Just 28 players boast an OPS that high during that time (min. 1,000 PA), but Evan Longoria, Carlos Gonzalez, Ryan Zimmerman, Troy Tulowitzki, and Butler are the only ones to do so at age 25 or younger. Clearly, the Royals' first baseman has emerged as one of the game's most dangerous young hitters.

Kansas City owns the game's best farm system, and they've now ensured that their best position player at the Major League level will be around when some of those highly touted prospects start to arrive. MLBTR's readers discussed Butler's future with the Royals after the team traded Zack Greinke to the Brewers last month.

Share 4 Retweet 52 Send via email0

Billy Butler Kansas City Royals Transactions

Cafardo On Loney, Papelbon, Pavano, Feliz
Main
Darren O’Day, Rangers Agree To Terms
129 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. BringVottoHome

    10 years ago

    Seems like a reasonable deal on both ends.

    Like
    Reply
  2. BlueCatuli

    10 years ago

    Answers the earlier MLBTR question about his future.

    Like
    Reply
  3. dc21892

    10 years ago

    He better be thanking Gil Meche.

    Like
    Reply
    • Dave_Gershman

      10 years ago

      Not really. They have no money on the books for 2012 before this. They have tons of flexibility.

      Most likely you’ll see them use that Meche money on development rather than payroll.

      Like
      Reply
      • dc21892

        10 years ago

        It was sarcasm. I know they have money to spend.

        Like
        Reply
        • Dave_Gershman

          10 years ago

          Gotcha

          Like
          Reply
  4. tim c

    10 years ago

    i love this deal…

    Like
    Reply
  5. Daniel Wesley

    10 years ago

    Great deal, Dayton.

    Like
    Reply
  6. Brad426

    10 years ago

    THAT’S how you “extend” a player, Walt Jocketty… you buy at least one year of free agency.

    Like
    Reply
    • Ethanator99

      10 years ago

      I’ve been mad about the Votto contract since it happened. At least twice a day I’m like “Come one Votto, and you too Jocketty!”

      Like
      Reply
      • Sean

        10 years ago

        votto got exactly what he wanted, escalating pricey arbitration years and the same date to hit the open market

        He knows the Blue Jays are watching and dumping salary getting ready for him

        Like
        Reply
  7. 0vercast

    10 years ago

    Very reasonable contract for the Royals for what will very likely be some of the best years of Butler’s career. WIN/WIN.

    Like
    Reply
  8. barroomhero

    10 years ago

    That is a GREAT deal for the Royals. I can’t help but love it for them.

    Like
    Reply
    • The_Silver_Stacker

      10 years ago

      You have a soft spot for the Royals? HAHA. I have one for the Rockies, not really sure why, but just do.

      Like
      Reply
      • barroomhero

        10 years ago

        I love watching how a team that really has limitations attached to it works. They have to do things that are more interesting and different than what I see with the Red Sox. Let’s face it, most RS deals are boring and expected. KC is more interesting plain and simple. Plus, with a team that has a great history, I want to see them doing well. It also helped that one of my favorite players of all time is George Brett.

        Like
        Reply
  9. pastlives

    10 years ago

    this seems curious, should they have traded him to clear room for their multiple corner IF prospects?

    Like
    Reply
    • dc21892

      10 years ago

      Butler can take over at DH when the time comes.

      Like
      Reply
    • bbxxj

      10 years ago

      The plan is:

      1B: Hosmer
      3B: Moustakas
      DH: Butler

      No blocking anyone.

      Like
      Reply
      • YanksFanSince78

        10 years ago

        So ths pretty much means Kila has no place at all w/in the Royals organization right? Damn shame. That kid is going to crush hrs and have a nice OBP. Sort of like Travis Hafner.

        Can Kila play any other field position other than 1B?

        Like
        Reply
        • Carl06

          10 years ago

          No, but Hosmer can probably make the move to a corner outfield spot. The Royals would only want to do that, however, if Kila proves in 2011 that he’s worth keeping around on a contending team.

          Like
          Reply
          • MoCrash

            10 years ago

            If Kila shows something, then he could be bait near the trade deadline. Also, signing Butler locks down a good hitter, which increases his trade value immensely. When you’re where the Royals are, there are no untouchables. Quality depth has tangible value.

            Like
            Reply
            • YanksFanSince78

              10 years ago

              It’s funny. It just seems as if theRoyals’ fan base has little love for Kila K. Aside from one awful year in the minors his lack of PT time seems to be a case more of being held back vs non-performance. He might be limited as far as position play but he seems to be everything they lack at the mlb level…..power and great OBP potential. That’s a great combo. He just screams “young Jason Giambi/Travis Hafner” to me. In his last 3 years @ AA/AAA he’s had consecutive seasons of more BB than KO and has avg’d at least 25 hrs.

              As a Yanks fan, assuming that Montero can hold the C position, I would love to see what Kila could do in NY as a left hitter with patience sandwhiched in between some professional hitters.

              Like
              Reply
              • setupunchtag

                10 years ago

                “It just seems as if theRoyals’ fan base has little love for Kila K.” Actually, the fan base has a lot of love for Kaaihue, it’s the front office who did stuff like trading for Mike Jacobs, blocking his path after his break-thru 2008 season. Fortunately, they seem like they want to give him a full opportunity this year. He has a lot of the same plusses Jack Cust brought to the A’s for several years, but with fewer K’s than Cust.

                Like
                Reply
            • YanksFanSince78

              10 years ago

              Btw, are you a KC fan? If so, what positions to you feel probably CAN NOT be filled by in house minor lge options?

              Like
              Reply
              • wcg1380

                10 years ago

                Realistically, the only position that lacks depth in the system is corner outfield… we are also thin on right handed starters at the upper levels.

                Corner outfield is barren of high-end talent; David Lough and Paulo Orlando could be viewed as CF prospects, their defense in the corners is outstanding, but little to no power to speak of. After those two, unless you count Wil Myers, which I think the Royals do, we have Tim Smith, Nick Van Stratten, Nick Francis, and Carlos Testa… there is certainly a reason you have never heard of any of those guys.

                To me, Salvador Perez and Manny Pina make moving Myers to right a more than acceptable option… third is also a place that lacks some depth after Moustakas the next real prospect at the position is Cheslor Cuthbert, and at 17 years old he has a lot of time for things to go wrong, but the Gary Sheffield comparisons are nice.

                Like
                Reply
                • setupunchtag

                  10 years ago

                  Good assessment on positional depth, wcg. I think you’ll be able to add Eibner to the COF discussion by the end of the year, but yeah, some serious production corner outfield prospects would shore up the system pretty completely. I hope the Royals use some of their MecheMoney for another high-end Latin SS prospect, if available, and as you mentioned, another RHP.

                  Like
                  Reply
              • wcg1380

                10 years ago

                Realistically, the only position that lacks depth in the system is corner outfield… we are also thin on right handed starters at the upper levels.

                Corner outfield is barren of high-end talent; David Lough and Paulo Orlando could be viewed as CF prospects, their defense in the corners is outstanding, but little to no power to speak of. After those two, unless you count Wil Myers, which I think the Royals do, we have Tim Smith, Nick Van Stratten, Nick Francis, and Carlos Testa… there is certainly a reason you have never heard of any of those guys.

                To me, Salvador Perez and Manny Pina make moving Myers to right a more than acceptable option… third is also a place that lacks some depth after Moustakas the next real prospect at the position is Cheslor Cuthbert, and at 17 years old he has a lot of time for things to go wrong, but the Gary Sheffield comparisons are nice.

                Like
                Reply
              • MoCrash

                10 years ago

                Actually, I’m a Cardinals fan first, but live only an hour from KC and go to more Royals games these days.

                The Royals’ system is thinnest at C, SS and RF (both corners, actually, but especially RF due to arm strength). It’s deepest at 1B, CF and pitching. With Butler at 1B now and Hosmer soon to arrive, Kila is kind of the odd man out. The Royals believe he can hit, but he’s no better than Butler defensively (and not close to Hosmer). As soon as Hosmer comes up, either Kila or Butler become expendable.

                Like
                Reply
    • Matt Manzella

      10 years ago

      Isn’t Butler close to 300lbs now? DH role would be best. Royals are gonna be scary come 2012 and beyond.

      Like
      Reply
      • kcalltheway

        10 years ago

        Butler played last year at about 230-240.

        Like
        Reply
      • Matt Manzella

        10 years ago

        Sorry, 250lbs, still, point stands.

        Like
        Reply
      • safari_punch

        10 years ago

        The new Bob Hamelin.

        But you are right…he’ll be 300 by the end of this deal. $30 million can buy a LOT of donuts.

        Like
        Reply
  10. todd

    10 years ago

    Good too see the Royals do the right thing. They need to hold onto Soria too. I might decide to attend a couple games now (I am about 3 hours away).

    Like
    Reply
    • dc21892

      10 years ago

      Soria is still there for three or four more years (can’t recall the exact years) on a team friendly contract so there is no need extend him now. And Butler was going to be with the Royals since he’s under team control anyways. Not sure why locking him up changes your mind about attending a Royals game.

      Like
      Reply
      • todd

        10 years ago

        I know about Soria. I meant to keep him and not trade him. I am a Braves fan fyi, but a major league baseball fan too. I feel bad for the Royals on them having to trade players away as soon as they get good because of a cheapa$$ owner. The Royals are bad for baseball for the opposite reasons of the Yankees, they don’t spend at all. It would be nice to see a team that keeps it’s core together.

        Like
        Reply
        • dc21892

          10 years ago

          I hear ya. Ever been to their games? Field is nice too bad the attendance lacks. More fan support = bigger budget. Look at the Rays.

          Like
          Reply
          • Tko11

            10 years ago

            The Rays have to get out of Tampa! Good young team, no support, no money to resign players, not gonna fly in the AL East. Especially when their division rivals have big check books.

            Like
            Reply
        • BoSoxSam

          10 years ago

          Well actually though, I would argue trading Soria for a good haul could easily make them a much better team, especially in the LR, than not trading him. He’s a CLOSER. He’s a luxury for them until they actually start winning games. And bullpen pitchers have always been one of the easiest players to replace. Soria himself will be hard to replace, but KC could still have a strong bullpen without him, with a couple good moves. And moving him could bring in more position player prospects, etc. that would help bolster their team going forward a lot more. Not to mention if they get his admittedly modest salary out of there, they’ll have a couple million more to work with.

          Like
          Reply
          • MoCrash

            10 years ago

            I think that having the flexibility to move Soria for the right price is why the Royals were high on Jeffress.

            Like
            Reply
        • tim c

          10 years ago

          a la pittsburgh maybe??? i would love to see the walker/tabata/alvarez/mccutcheon tandem locked up a la billy butler in kc…

          Like
          Reply
      • start_wearing_purple

        10 years ago

        4 years, 3 of which are team options.

        Like
        Reply
  11. kräftig. entschieden

    10 years ago

    Insert spillover rage at Tony Reagins for not extending Billy Butler here.

    Like
    Reply
  12. Mike Miller

    10 years ago

    It feels like this is the offseason of the extension

    Like
    Reply
    • The_Silver_Stacker

      10 years ago

      and the very reason why the Yankees are having a time finding any MLB quality arms available

      Like
      Reply
  13. twenty1thirteen

    10 years ago

    Glad to see at least one FA year was bought out. Great signing all around.

    Like
    Reply
  14. setupunchtag

    10 years ago

    Very smart signing. Even if they don’t keep him, that contract is going to look sweet to SOMEONE in that 4th year. The Royals will get his 25th, 26th, 27th, and 28th years, what should be his best, and Billy will be a FA at a young enough age to sign a mega-deal someplace else. So it IS win/win. The Royals and teams like them don’t need to keep every good/great player until they retire, but if they can keep them under affordable contracts through most of their PRIME years, they should be able to compete. This contract is a model for that kind of thinking. And as for future line-ups it will go even deeper when adding Myers to the mix.

    Like
    Reply
  15. Zuidvogels

    10 years ago

    Great deal for the Royals.

    That said this thread is proof of why the Royals don’t get much love(publicity) and the Yankees, Red Sox and other big market teams do. They just extended one of their young stars and there is like 30 comments. Yankees, Red Sox or Phillies make this type of move there would be 300 comments in about 10 minutes.

    Like
    Reply
    • Tko11

      10 years ago

      Cant really compare Kansas City to New York, Boston and Philadelphia.

      Like
      Reply
      • thebigdog

        10 years ago

        With a salary cap we could — see the 80’s

        Butler is a good and very smart hitter. For a man of his strength, he doesn’t try to pull everything.

        Like
        Reply
        • Tko11

          10 years ago

          A salary cap would do nothing for baseball…

          Like
          Reply
          • mcchampions

            10 years ago

            Why?

            Not even being patronizing, just wondering the reasoning.

            Like
            Reply
            • Tko11

              10 years ago

              Either way certain teams such as the yankees, red sox, tigers will spend and others will not such as the marlins, rays etc. If you are a fan of a team such as the Yankees or Red Sox or another big market, would you rather have the owners pocket the money or invest it in the team? The cap would also have to increase with inflation etc. Theres just so many things that would have to be settled and I really dont see it happening. A cap is also pretty discriminatory as it only really affects the big markets. If you are going to make a cap, why not have a floor as well? Make the teams like the marlins spend more money…I think the mets are a good example high payroll, little results. Therefore its not how much money you have, its more of how you use it.

              Like
              Reply
              • get_on_up

                10 years ago

                whether teams hit a ‘cap’ isn’t the point of a ‘cap’. By limiting a team spending 4x another team you increase competitiveness. If you add a floor so be it but a arguing a cap is bad b/c some teams wont hit it isnt the point

                Like
                Reply
                • Tko11

                  10 years ago

                  The point is that some teams decide to stay around the 20-50 million payroll mark and they pocket the luxury tax money. A cap makes the rich owners stop investing money into their teams and pocket the money. If I am a fan of the yankees I would much rather have the money invested into players than for the owner to just keep it. If you want to increase competitiveness the only way to do that is to be every single team in an even market. Without doing that its just not possible.

                  Like
                  Reply
          • get_on_up

            10 years ago

            see NFL for the strengths of a real salary cap. Teams can be turned around very quickly and impossible to spend your way to the top.

            Like
            Reply
            • Tko11

              10 years ago

              You cant compare the NFL to the MLB. You cant compare the NBA to the NFL. Different leagues, different outcomes. Just like some countries have different types of laws than others, certain laws wouldnt work in certain countries.

              Like
              Reply
              • thebigdog

                10 years ago

                I understand that the idea of a salary cap is something that you personally do not like, howver, your arguments are lacking. Have you ever asked yourself why the Pirates, Orioles and Royals were among the best teams in baseball for a long time before the huge salary escalations of the 90’s?

                Hypothetically speaking, a 100 million dollar salary cap would not only force the big market teams to significantly cut their payroll, but would also put pressure on the small market teams to spend more — and it would be worth it because an extra 20-30 million would no longer be throwing money away because they would still be at 80-90 million and about 50% behind the big guys.

                A cap would also bring the avg. salary down a little which has been needed for a long time now. Hey, maybe families could finally afford to go to a ballgames again AND actually see teams that aren’t 15 games out by the all-star break.

                Like
                Reply
                • Tko11

                  10 years ago

                  I wouldnt really know about the 90’s business aspect of baseball since I was born 1990. But wouldnt players have to agree to have their salaries cut? A team with a 200 million dollar payroll like the yankees cant just cut half of the team or restructure half of the teams contracts because of a cap. And I said below already, a cap would just have team owners pocketing money. If you are a fan would you not want to see money be spent on the team rather than going into the owners pockets?

                  Like
                  Reply
                • YanksFanSince78

                  10 years ago

                  A salary cap would also come with a salary floor. A salary floor will force the elimination or relocation of 2 or 3 teams that are just not viable franchizes. Also, it would mean a hel! of a lot of money (10’s of millions) taken away from the players and put back into the pockets of the owners. It’s too naive to think owners would then cut their staduim related profits.

                  I could also blame teams like the Pirates and Royals for having some really bad drafting over the last 20 years as well. The O’s have money. They are far from a small market team.

                  Like
                  Reply
                  • Tko11

                    10 years ago

                    Exactly!! Most of these people dont understand the complications of making a salary cap and also that the owners would pocket so much extra money. I do think players salaries are too high as of right now but I dont see how you can just decrease their salaries, its really not fair to the players. I would guess the players union would also have to agree to that which I see as very unlikely.

                    Like
                    Reply
                    • thebigdog

                      10 years ago

                      The way the system is set up now, the owners are able to pocket money in small markets because the fans know that it is foolish to believe that the Pirates, Orioles and Royals can compete in the arena of payrolls with the Cubs, Yankees, Red Sox, White Sox, Tigers etc.

                      It looks like the Packers are about to go the the Super Bowl again. If there were no salary cap in the NFL, half of their team would be on the Giants and the Cowboys and Green Bay would average about 4 wins per year.

                      “Most of these people dont understand the complications of making a salary cap”

                      My friend, you were born in 1990 — you have a lot to learn yourself, like the inherent unfairness of not having a salary cap. Baseball is supposed to be a “sport” which requires a level playing field. The way things are now, it should be referred to as a spectacle.

                      Like
                      Reply
                      • Tko11

                        10 years ago

                        So why dont the teams like the Rays for example always decide to let their talent go and collect draft picks. The rays are close to the playoffs and still decide not to spend. I said this before and i will say it again, if you want an even playing field you would need every team in an even market. I just dont understand how you can punish team in bigger markets because not everyone can afford to spend as much as you do. What is this communism?

                        Like
                        Reply
                        • thebigdog

                          10 years ago

                          “I said this before and i will say it again, if you want an even playing field you would need every team in an even market”

                          Wrong, the NFL, NBA and NHL all have salary caps which disprove this. If you care to learn about blatant unfairness, you should read about the old days in the NHL when there was no draft and all young players could sign wherever they wanted and teams could sign as much of the great young talent as they so desired. Since 95 of the talent came from Canada, is it any wonder that Montreal on Toronto dominated for decades (with some good showings from Detroit)?

                          “So why dont the teams like the Rays for example always decide to let their talent go and collect draft picks”

                          Tampa Bay was so bad for so long that they couldn’t help but become competitive merely by having so many overall number one or two picks. Unfortunately, allowing Crawford to leave via FA and trading a very good young arm like Garza will mark the beginning of the end for the Rays. Just as the Marlins had some very good teams, only to become pathetic in the NL, the Rays will probably be around .500 this year, trade Longoria within a couple of years and leave the company of the Yankees and Red Sox to join the Bluejays and Orioles.

                          “I just dont understand how you can punish team in bigger markets”

                          Right now your mindset punishes the vast majority of teams in baseball, a cap would only force about 6 or 8 teams to reduce their payroll.. and bring it back to actually being a sport.

                          “What is this communism?”

                          Sports is entertainment far more than it is business. Not one owner in baseball would spend such a disproportionate amount of revenue on employee salaries in any of their other ventures, as they do in baseball.

                          Thanks for the exchange, you seem very reasonable.. and for the record, I’m a White Sox fan — so my proposal is based in objectivity since it would actually “punish” the Sox and help build up the Royals.

                          BTW, short of a salary cap, what would you think of rosters fluctuating with the team salary? Something like this:

                          under 60 million = 28 man roster
                          under 80 million = 27 man roster
                          under 100 million = 26 man roster
                          over 120 million = 24 man roster
                          over 150 million = 23 man roster

                          Like
                          Reply
                          • setupunchtag

                            10 years ago

                            Enjoyed your thoughts. I have said for awhile now that if baseball would like to improve competitive balance through non-cap, revenue-sharing means, what they could and should do is give the teams with the 4 worst records 3 extra roster spots, the next 4 worse 2 extra, and the next 4 worse with one extra roster spot. Since most of the elite players end up in one of the top 8 markets, then why not use depth to counter it?

                            Giving the teams with the worst records an extra roster spot or 3 for a LOOGY, another platoon option, a 6th starter, a third catcher, a defensive specialist, a base-stealing PR, or whatever, would be a help. Quality vs quantity.

                            The players union should like it; it means 24 major-league jobs. The small markets could afford it, since those players would all be at the ML minimum end of the pay-scale. The large markets should like it because it lets them spend the way they want without having to give luxury money to the small market clubs. Everyone wins.

                            Like
                            Reply
                    • Moe Lester

                      10 years ago

                      Isn’t that what revenue sharing is all about? And how much money do you think Glass(KC owner) will be pocketing this year?
                      TKO11, I guess if you take a tax law approach to the players salary, then the players salary equals the FMV. But what other sprot do you see spending this type of money on players outside of European soccer?

                      Like
                      Reply
                  • thebigdog

                    10 years ago

                    Exactly how much money could the Orioles spend before they started losing money?

                    Now be honest with yourself, at that point, how many games would they realistically win in the A.L. Central? Baltimore had a payroll of about $81 million last year — let’s say you’re right and the “OWNERS” spent 50% more on players this year. That would put them at about $120 million, which realistically would increase their win total to about 80 — still no where near the playoffs. Why are you asking them to be stupid?

                    Like
                    Reply
                    • thebigdog

                      10 years ago

                      Sorry, meant to say A.L. East for Baltimore not A.L. Central.

                      Like
                      Reply
              • get_on_up

                10 years ago

                of course you can. Very simple.

                Like
                Reply
            • TDKnies

              10 years ago

              That’s why the Pats, Colts, and Steelers represent the AFC in the Super Bowl almost every year right?

              Like
              Reply
              • get_on_up

                10 years ago

                or 10 different NFC teams in 1o years?

                Like
                Reply
                • TDKnies

                  10 years ago

                  Well I’ll be damned if we both aren’t right.

                  Like
                  Reply
                • YanksFanSince78

                  10 years ago

                  How many different WS winners in the last 10 years?

                  Dbacks, Angels, Marlins, Red Sox, White Sox, Tigers, Phillies, Yanks, Giants
                  . Yes, many of those teams had to go thru the Yanks but the fact is, this idea that there’s less parody in baseball isn’t true.

                  Like
                  Reply
                  • get_on_up

                    10 years ago

                    yet the top 4 spenders have made the playoffs at a 90%clip (obviously greater for the top 2 spenders) over the years. No guarantee of winning it all but almost guaranteed a playoff spot. That’s not parity…especially when a club can outspend #3 on the list by 100%. No other pro us sport as anything as messed up as MLB. Imagine the Eagles with a payroll of $200mill and most of there NFL teams at $90…that woudl be a joke and that is MLB

                    Like
                    Reply
                    • YanksFanSince78

                      10 years ago

                      I’ve talked about this numerous times. There are way too many differences between the NFL and MLB to even think a salary cap would work.

                      A) Guaranteed contracts
                      B) Game schedule
                      C) Amount of games played
                      D) Ability to draft and integrate new talent immediately.
                      E) Difference in pay of offensive players vs defensive players.

                      Like
                      Reply
                  • Moe Lester

                    10 years ago

                    How many times has a small market, Like a Green Bay, made the playoffs in MLB? Look at KC for an example. Royals won the WS in 85, never sniffed the playoffs since. Cheifs, while patthtic in the playoffs, have lost seven playoff games since 1993. Where’s your parody in MLB? I see a lot of big spending teams on your WS list there, Yanks, Boston, Chicago, Deteroit, Philly, LA.

                    Like
                    Reply
                • Moe Lester

                  10 years ago

                  And the Chiefs made the playoffs with the 3rd lowest salary spending, why? Because there are no NY Yankees and Bosox in NFL due to a salary cap.

                  Like
                  Reply
                  • YanksFanSince78

                    10 years ago

                    YES. That’s the reason!! Has nothing to do with anything else.

                    Like
                    Reply
                    • Moe Lester

                      10 years ago

                      Yes, but you can’t say that the salary cap had nothing to do with can you? Without a salary cap the chiefs would have no way of getting to the playoffs simply because KC and other markets like KC LACK THE MARKET TO SPEND 200 Million on a team.
                      And isn’t it funny, this year in the Superbowl, Pittsburg and Green Bay, small markets. Hel! of a lot better than your “parody in MLB” argument.

                      Like
                      Reply
              • setupunchtag

                10 years ago

                The Pats are the only one of those teams in a large market, though. The system allows teams from small markets such as Pittsburg and Indy to compete with the larger markets. Were they in baseball’s system the Steelers would have the success of the Pirates, and Indy, well, they’d have no team at all.

                Like
                Reply
                • Moe Lester

                  10 years ago

                  Or Indy would have the Royals, which is pretty close to no team. . .

                  Like
                  Reply
        • East Coast Bias

          10 years ago

          Heh, it sounds all nice and cute arbitrarily, but when you get into the specifics, people abandon the argument. It’s like politicians saying “we need budget cuts” and can’t name anything significant when asked what they would cut.

          So, what should the salary cap be?

          Like
          Reply
          • Moe Lester

            10 years ago

            Your title says it all my friend “East Coast Bias”

            Like
            Reply
            • East Coast Bias

              10 years ago

              As does yours? heh

              Seriously though, if someone would man up and give me a figure, then we can have dialogue about it. But until then, people will throw out catch phrases, but never any specifics. C’est la vie.

              Like
              Reply
    • East Coast Bias

      10 years ago

      That’s because they have a bigger fanbase.

      Like
      Reply
  16. Sean

    10 years ago

    If only the royals would have done this with any other home grown players or any players in general that aren’t Mike Sweeney or Gil Meche

    Like
    Reply
  17. MetsEventually

    10 years ago

    Guessing Butler will go be the DH once Hosmer comes up? Butler being the DH or even traded away for prospects is just as good.

    Like
    Reply
  18. Derek Carter

    10 years ago

    What’s the prize for having the best farm system (and the worst team in the majors)?

    Like
    Reply
    • setupunchtag

      10 years ago

      …historically, the prize has been a playoff birth within 4 years of being announced by BA as having one…

      Like
      Reply
      • jwredsox

        10 years ago

        Arizona Diamondbacks had one of the top farms ever a few years ago. They seem to be doing good now.

        Like
        Reply
        • setupunchtag

          10 years ago

          Arizona was IN the playoffs in 2007 one year after being named BA’s minor league system of the year in ’06. Would you like to at least pick an exception to what I said about teams reaching the playoffs within 4 years? And I never said anything about what they’re doing now, you did.

          Like
          Reply
    • Brent Saindon

      10 years ago

      Having fans that don’t act like whining children and/or arrogant jerks, I would think.

      Like
      Reply
      • Maxmbob

        10 years ago

        ???

        Like
        Reply
    • Dave Beal

      10 years ago

      The 2012 Playoffs, and the 2013 WS, and the 2014 WS, and the 2015 WS

      Like
      Reply
  19. mkorpal

    10 years ago

    So, is Ka’aihue available then? Would like him on the Rockies.

    Like
    Reply
  20. Mike G

    10 years ago

    Good move by Dayton Moore, who has quietly had a very nice offseason. As a Royals fan that has wanted to strangle him at times, I gotta give props to him. Respectable return on trading our best player in a decade, quietly signed some benchgap players with something to prove to one year deals, and locked up Butler on the condition he starts trying to leg out his 100 infield dribblers. I’ve honestly never been this excited about a team that is a lock to lose 100 games, I can’t wait to start seeing this talent finally manifest in Kansas City. Hopefully, just hopefully, better days are on the horizon.

    Like
    Reply
    • barroomhero

      10 years ago

      I do hope you don’t really think the Melky and Frenchy signings were part of a nice offseason. Yuck.

      Like
      Reply
      • Mike G

        10 years ago

        Judging by the picture next to your name, I can see how you wouldn’t consider it a good offseason. But here’s the thing, if my team’s GM signs the wrong free agent to a big deal, it cripples our franchise for years. Meanwhile, your team’s GM can still skate by despite signing all the Daisuke Matsuzakas, JD Drews, Marco Scutaros, Keith Foulkes, Matt Clements, Edgar Renterias, and Julio Lugos of the world.

        That being said, signing three free agents, who have all had success at one point in their careers and are on the right side of 30, to one year deals is part of a nice offseason. Ya dig?

        Like
        Reply
        • Jon Stark

          10 years ago

          Scutaro hasn’t exactly been a bad signing. It has not been great, but it is not awful.

          Like
          Reply
        • barroomhero

          10 years ago

          No, I was just calling him signing two of the absolute worst players in MLB not great. The deal for Greinke was solid and this Butler deal is looking better and better. But, those two deals just don’t help the club next year at all. I am not expecting them to sign lots of FA’s to multi-year deals but I feel like GMDM could have made a couple of better pickups than those two.

          Nice tp see that prejudices run both ways with major and minor market fans.

          Like
          Reply
      • MoCrash

        10 years ago

        Neither Cabrera nor Francouer are considered more than gap players until the kids come up. If either or both crap out, it’s a low-price one-year deal which can at least produce ABs. If both or either show something, then they can either lock down a spot or bring value at the trading deadline. A small-market franchise cannot just throw money at players; it has to find small values here and there which may either upgrade positions or bring players which eventually well. The farm system has to constantly be fed when the top-end payroll — and this only if and when the team is on the verge of contending — is in the $70-80M range (and under $50M in 2010).

        Like
        Reply
        • YanksFanSince78

          10 years ago

          I think one can argue that regardless of the length of the deals Cabrera and Melky have little upside. I guess the truth might be that it’s difficult to lure the Damons, Mannys or Thomes to KC as they are clearly in rebuild mode and vets would probably take a little less to play for a contender. That being said, little is on the line if Melky and Franky give you nothing.

          Like
          Reply
          • MoCrash

            10 years ago

            The Royals are sellers of the Damons, Mannys and Thomes, not the buyers. In fact, Damon came from the Royals’ farm system, but was unaffordable (Scott Boras client then). Unless he’s another George Brett, one’s unlikely to see any Royals player spend his entire career in Kansas City — and the last thing a Kauffman Stadium team needs is an aging slugger who can’t play D (like the Damons, Mannys and Thomes). Those are AL East types, but don’t fit the (high-tech) cow pasture that is The K. Melky and Frenchy are low-risk corner OFs who either contribute or don’t; neither is important to the Royals in the long term, unless he begins to fulfill the potential they displayed when younger (sometimes that happens, more often it doesn’t).

            Like
            Reply
            • YanksFanSince78

              10 years ago

              I understand all that and I understand why they signed Melky and Frenchy. I was just pointing out that the Royals are not capable of attracting vet like that so the Melkys and the Frenchys are the way to go.

              Like
              Reply
              • Moe Lester

                10 years ago

                Maybe because MLB doesn’t have a salary cap??

                Like
                Reply
  21. setupunchtag

    10 years ago

    …or John Lackey, who’s easily worth the $61 million in 4 years he’s do (and he’s 31 so his best years are ahead of him, he-he), but hey, when your payroll is $160, what’s $30-50 million in poor judgements when you still have $120 million to correct them?

    Like
    Reply
    • Mike G

      10 years ago

      Ah I forgot John Lackey in my previous post, that would have REALLY driven home my point!

      Like
      Reply
  22. Scooter8080

    10 years ago

    The 5th year club option makes this a great deal for the Royals.

    Like
    Reply
    • Mike G

      10 years ago

      Especially if he starts to hit some home runs and stop grounding into 20 double plays a season!!

      Like
      Reply
  23. darkstorm97

    10 years ago

    To all of those asking about Kila… I have a feeling he’ll be evaluated this year. If he shows something, they might move Hosmer to a corner OF spot. One thing our prosperous minors system hasn’t produced is COF’ers (althoug Myers will change that once he switches from catcher this year, hehe).

    We may also trade him off for the right price. But I see that as less viable an option as he’s not even played a full season yet.

    Seriously, I see Kila as a .250/20/70 type of guy with average (or slightly above)defense. He did have a high OBP in the minors, but he K’d quite a bit last year in his two months in KC.

    Like
    Reply
  24. Levi_Payton

    10 years ago

    Honestly, I haven’t figured out why Hosmer hasn’t been linked to RF in the past. I’ve watched him play a ton of games and he’s very athletic, not to mention he has a very strong arm. I believe he could easily be a solid outfielder. If Kila hits, I’d love to see him stay and Hosmer play RF. However, I think they will trade Ka’aihue at the deadline if he’s showing something and call up Hosmer to pair with Billy at first. Kila’s bat would be nice in our lineup.

    Like
    Reply
    • David C. Ruckman

      10 years ago

      I think it’s more about the fact that Hosmer can actually play his position quite well. Too many guys in the Royals’ farm system are 1B/LF/DH types with average or below-average gloves — especially Clint Robinson. He looked like Sloth from “The Goonies” in his limited on-field work in 2010. I’d even go as far to say that Mike Moustakas isn’t a good defensive third baseman, which makes him movable if necessary. There are two many ambiguous “sluggers” in the system right now, which makes for a deceptively “deep” farm system.

      Like
      Reply
  25. okbluejays

    10 years ago

    Solid signing for KC, he should perform to that contract if he stays healthy. I’m not quite sure how well he’ll age, but over the next 4 years he should be pretty good for 20hr’s/45dbls/.290/.360obp. They also get one of his Free Agent years at a nice price. Good job KC.

    Like
    Reply
  26. lefty177

    10 years ago

    I don’t know much about KC’s farm but i know they have a stellar class coming soon, doesn’t Moustakus (spelling is wrong, i know) play 1B?

    Like
    Reply
    • Koby2

      10 years ago

      3B, and he’s become adequate there, though he could always get worse and have to be moved off.

      Like
      Reply
      • setupunchtag

        10 years ago

        …well, yeah, I guess he could become worse, but usually 21 year-old players tend to get BETTER. Now, he may not improve enough to stay at 3rd but to say ‘he could always get worse’…you might as well say, ‘Of course, he could always get hit by a bus or be abducted by aliens’. I guess that could happen but that’s not normally the way things go.

        Like
        Reply
  27. alxn

    10 years ago

    very team-friendly deal. take notes walt jockety

    Like
    Reply
  28. nebelski

    10 years ago

    This move actually surprises me a little bit. With Ka’aihue and Hosmer, I figured that Butler would be the odd man out. I at least thought that they would wait until Hosmer got to Kansas City and assessed the three of them before making an extension decision. I guess a big question would be whether Ka’aihue or Hosmer will be the odd man out; or perhaps they will find a place for all three? One could play first, one DH, and one in the outfield? If not, send Ka’aihue or Hosmer to Pittsburgh! This is a log-jam that I have been waiting a year to play out. LOL… (wishful thinking is OK) ;)

    Like
    Reply
    • nebelski

      10 years ago

      I didn’t read any posts before I made my own and it appears that everyone has been addressing the same things as I intended. Good!

      Like
      Reply
  29. yankeeaddiction

    10 years ago

    Many teams have won with less than steller defensive firts basemen. With Butler signed to a long term affordable deal maybe now is the best time to deal him. His contract position and what they can return in a trade makes me think the Rays would be a perfect fit for Butler and the perfect trading partner for the Royals.

    Look at the FA class the last few years, Ordonez 1 year deal, Thome 1 year deal, Vlad 1 year deal, Jones 1 year deal, Manny one year deal. A young Royals team with a shot to win would be appealing to many FA DH’s. These guys have been affordable and the Royals would probably be better trading a very affordable Butler to any number of teams who love the fact he is locked up in return for prospects ready to play at the ML level. They would probably be better with a return of a prospect for a need position, Hosmer at first and signing a DH than just slotting Butler in the DH slot.

    Even the Orioles who signed Lee to a one year deal could be a match. Acquiring Butler to play first and sliding Lee into the DH slot and using him as a backup first baseman would make them better over the long term. If they would trade Pie and Tillman for Blanton trading those same two for Butler looks like a win win to me.

    Baseball has changed and the players that will bring the largest return in a trade are those that are exactly like Butler, young guys who have proven to be good players, who are affordable for a few years. Teams can justify giving up top prospects for a guy like this and will more often than for a deadline rental or for a guy like AGone who you will have to almost immediately commit big money to. For some reason I think the Rays getting Butler and taking a flier on Gordon could really work out well for them with the Royals getting legit impact prospects in return.

    Like
    Reply
  30. coolstorybro222

    10 years ago

    Good signing. He could be the next big first baseman.

    Like
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Royals, Hunter Dozier Agree To Four-Year Extension

    Giants, Scott Kazmir Agree To Minor League Deal

    Kelvin Herrera Announces Retirement

    Braves Extend Brian Snitker

    Yankees Sign Justin Wilson

    Braves Sign Jake Lamb

    Athletics Sign Mitch Moreland

    Yankees Re-Sign Brett Gardner

    Giants To Sign Jake McGee

    Mariners CEO Kevin Mather Resigns

    Recent

    Royals, Hunter Dozier Agree To Four-Year Extension

    NL Notes: Willis, Syndergaard, Myers

    NL Central Notes: Contreras, Mikolas, Brewers

    Braves Report Major Revenue Drop, Operating Losses In 2020

    Tigers Sign Drew Hutchison To Minors Deal

    Blue Jays Acquire Travis Bergen From Diamondbacks

    Health Notes: Pham, File, Rodriguez, Reyes

    Minor MLB Transactions: 2/28/21

    Cubs Designate Robert Stock For Assignment

    COVID Notes: Abreu, Montas, Happ, Cordero

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Kris Bryant Rumors
    • Jackie Bradley Jr. Rumors
    • Jake Odorizzi Rumors
    • Taijuan Walker Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version