Headlines

  • Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim
  • Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon
  • Brandon Woodruff To Start For Brewers On Sunday
  • Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds
  • Rangers Option Josh Jung
  • Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Trade Notes: Escobar, Yankees, Shields

By Jeff Todd | December 3, 2015 at 12:03pm CDT

We just took a look at the latest on Braves righty Shelby Miller, but there are plenty of other possible trade situations percolating around the league. Here are some notes on a few of those:

  • The Nationals are expected to dangle infielder Yunel Escobar in trade talks next week, Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports tweets. A possible trade of Escobar has long seemed plausible, as Washington has a variety of other right-handed-hitting infield options. He could still be relied upon to hold down the fort at shortstop while Trea Turner finishes his development, but a left-handed bat (such as Ben Zobrist) would probably fit better. As I discussed in breaking down the Nats’ offseason outlook, the club might prefer to reallocate Escobar’s $7MM payroll hit elsewhere.
  • The Yankees are participating in wide-ranging trade talks in the run-up to the Winter Meetings, Buster Olney of ESPN.com tweets, with the one refrain being New York’s focus on adding young rotation pieces. That’s long seemed a defining focus of the winter for GM Brian Cashman, though it remains to be seen what level of starter the team hopes to acquire and what kind of assets it is willing to part with to make a deal.
  • Meanwhile, the Padres “continue to push” righty James Shields in trade talks, Olney tweets. Shields will soon turn 34, is coming off of an underwhelming campaign, and is owed $65MM over the next three seasons (including a 2019 option buyout) under his back-loaded deal. Those considerations suggest that San Diego may need to sweeten the pot (with young talent or cash) to find a taker for the contract, but Shields is hardly immovable. To the contrary, he’s still quite a useful pitcher: his 2015 effort did nothing to disturb his record of durability and he actually put up career highs in swinging strike rate (12.4%) and strikeout rate (9.6 K/9).
Share 31 Retweet 10 Send via email0

New York Yankees San Diego Padres Washington Nationals James Shields Yunel Escobar

Phillies GM Matt Klentak On Bourjos, Offseason
Main
Cliff Lee Intends To Pitch In 2016
View Comments (105)
Post a Comment

105 Comments

  1. Bringbacktheblue

    10 years ago

    Escobar could be an option for padres at short while we wait for guerra to be ready.

    Reply
    • petcopadre

      10 years ago

      A Shields for Escobar trade with the Pads sending some money might work.

      Reply
      • WolandJR

        10 years ago

        Seems like the Padres need Shields more than the Nats do. Best guesses so far seem to indicate that Escobar, if traded, would be dangled for a reliever.

        Reply
        • petcopadre

          10 years ago

          With that trade, the Padres would get significant salary relief, which would allow them to re-stock their pitching staff.

          Reply
          • disgruntledreader 2

            10 years ago

            Mike Leake and Shark are probably going to wind up at damn near what Shields is making in 2016. Neither projects to produce as much.

            Reply
          • JT19

            10 years ago

            Whats the value in that trade for the Nats though? Escobar is signed for two more years for I think $13. Shields is making $65 million over three, which is a $52 million difference. Nats would only take that if the Padres packaged a good player with him, a prospect or ate almost all (I would imagine $45 million at the least) if not the entire, contract.

            Reply
            • petcopadre

              10 years ago

              Somebody to fill the void left by Jordan Zimmerman. That would be the value

              Reply
              • JT19

                10 years ago

                Escobar had a career year while Shields is coming off a somewhat down year. Just saying that Shields is going to fill the void that Zimmerman left isn’t enough “value”. Zimmerman has much better numbers, is younger and AAV wise is cheaper than Shields.

                Again, the Padres would have to eat almost all the money left on Shields deal or trade a decent player/prospect in return just to make up value. When you consider how desperate the Padres are for SS/3B/2B, the Nats aren’t going to give up Escobar for a bad contract just to help the Padres out.

                Reply
                • YourDaddy

                  10 years ago

                  I dont think so. Shields has a WAR over the past 3 season, which is the length of production that is used to calculate value in FA typically, of 3.1 on average. That is worth $24.8 million per year on the FA market. He just had a year with one of the worst defenses in the league behind him and a bad catcher calling his games and he still increased his swinging strike rate and his K/9 while going over 200 IP for the 9th straight season. He may not be an ACE like Greinke or Price, but he is certainly worth the $21 million he will get the next 3 seasons. Remember, the Cubs and Giants both offered more than that AAV per season on a 3 year deal with an option for a 4th before the Padres signed him by guaranteeing the 4th year.

                  Reply
          • JPZ7

            10 years ago

            The nats could use Shields and then use Roark ,Ross or AJ Cole in the ‘pen and then sign O’Day and call-up or sign more

            Reply
      • A'sfaninUK

        10 years ago

        Escobar doesn’t have a lot of trade value though. He’s a notorious clubhouse cancer.

        Reply
        • kennygee

          10 years ago

          I’m sorry to disappoint you, but Escobar is far from a cancer on the bench or in the clubhouse. He’s not only well liked by his teammates, but the coaching staff as well. In reply to a question about his rep as a clubhouse cancer, the beat-writer that follows the team, that Escobar has been a model team player since he arrived.

          He’s being branded by fans because of one incident and for which he apologized for and had been a perfect team and clubhouse guy since.

          The only real cancer the Nationals have is Papelbon and if he returns in 2016 they are gonna piss off a whole lot of fans, not to mention lose a bunch of them. Papelbon is hated in DC,

          Reply
        • Bringbacktheblue

          10 years ago

          You’re one of those guys who just assume all Hispanics are clubhouse cancers.

          Reply
          • petcopadre

            10 years ago

            I thought the same thing about his comment when I first read it. Thanks yougotpetcoed.

            Reply
          • terrymesmer

            10 years ago

            Toronto suspended Escobar then ran him out of town — for cause, not for being Hispanic.

            Reply
            • YourDaddy

              10 years ago

              He was not resigned by TBR not because of performance, but because of his attitude.

              Reply
            • LH

              10 years ago

              They traded him in the twelve player deal a year and a half later.. I’m willing to bet you’re not a braves, Jay’s, Rays or Nats fan and never got to see him interact and play on a daily basis consistently. The only thing fans don’t like about him is the double plays.

              Reply
      • gopads

        10 years ago

        wouldnt have to send money and yes the Padres want a starting SS but preferably one hitting from the leftside – pads would want more than Escober and no money involved, maybe part of a blockbuster type deal

        Reply
  2. blackleather

    10 years ago

    looking like Shields or Kemp is going to go, in trade…I just dont see Preller keeping both guys.

    Reply
    • kingfelix34

      10 years ago

      Last year everyone thought Preller was a genius getting all these guys, but now it looks like only 1 or 2 of the 5 big players he got last year will be there next season

      Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        10 years ago

        On a team where pitching comes at a premium?

        Reply
    • SixFlagsMagicPadres

      10 years ago

      I agree, and I could see them having an easier time moving shields over kemp.

      Reply
  3. jacknbd

    10 years ago

    If Padres trade shields they need pitching coming back

    Reply
  4. dlevin11

    10 years ago

    Kemp could be around for another year while we wait for Margot to be ready to play at MLB level.

    Reply
  5. adyo4552

    10 years ago

    Shields+prospects for Sandoval+Kelly sound fair?

    Reply
    • A'sfaninUK

      10 years ago

      Not in the slightest. Boston would have to add in big-name prospect to take those 2 horrendous albatrosses off their hands. You aren’t trading trash for treasure, that’s not how you are supposed to do trade proposals. You are supposed to make it hurt on your fave teams end – that’s what would make it closer to reality.

      No one is trading for Sandoval unless Moncada or Beintendi is coming with him.

      Reply
      • jbronsdon

        10 years ago

        Shields for Panda straight up

        Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          10 years ago

          Sorry, just not interested in Panda.

          Reply
        • Bringbacktheblue

          10 years ago

          Keep dreaming

          Reply
        • SixFlagsMagicPadres

          10 years ago

          Maybe in a casual fantasy league, but not in real life.

          Reply
          • vcp

            10 years ago

            Haha

            Reply
      • SaladFingers69

        10 years ago

        Did you just refer to Joe Kelly as having an albatross contract?

        Reply
      • Soxfan912

        10 years ago

        Since when is Shields treasure at this point? Kelly could actually be move effective moving forward than Shields will be. Also, no way Moncada would be thrown into that type of mutual player dump

        Reply
      • bruinsfan94 2

        10 years ago

        Thats insane. First off Kelly is hardly an albatross. No way would Moncada or Beintendi be involved thats crazy. Shows a real lack of understanding of how baseball works. Shields had more value then Sandvol but if he’s moved the Red Sox would put money in. Chances are non of them are getting traded.To say a top prospect would be moved to trade Sandoval just makes you look clueless. Also albatross is used for players like Sandoval or other players who are worth far less then they are paid, Kelly is young, looked good his last few starts and makes less then a million.

        Reply
    • hooligan

      10 years ago

      Red Sox don’t need a starter.

      Reply
      • Bringbacktheblue

        10 years ago

        And padres don’t need a panda

        Reply
        • vcp

          10 years ago

          A diet coke yes a panda bear no

          Reply
    • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

      10 years ago

      no no no no no no NO!!!!!!!!!!!! Stop pushing the Shields for Sandoval thing! We don’t want him!

      Reply
    • Soxfan912

      10 years ago

      you know when I saw that SD are “pushing” to move him I thought of the same. But I wasnt even going to add a prospect coming back to Boston.

      Reply
  6. A'sfaninUK

    10 years ago

    Shields 2015 year was sort of baffling. It’s like he was told to suddenly become a big strikeout/challenge hitters guy, when he was never really that before. Its like he tried something new and it didn’t really work. Perhaps it was the SD front office pushing this, on a “we paid you to be our ace, so go do traditional ace-type things”. Maybe if he was left to alone to pitch the way that led to him becoming an ace, he’d put up a better ERA&FIP.

    His season seems more like poor handling by the org than his own personal decline.

    Reply
    • petcopadre

      10 years ago

      I disagree. Shield’s attitude was his biggest problem not the organization.

      Reply
      • A'sfaninUK

        10 years ago

        He put up career highs in both BB/9 and SO/9, both by a long way. He simply wasn’t being the pitcher he was before 2015.

        Reply
        • petcopadre

          10 years ago

          I believe he also either led or was near the top of the league for giving up the most long balls.

          Reply
    • YourDaddy

      10 years ago

      His biggest and only problem in 2015 was the game calling of Norris.

      Reply
      • SixFlagsMagicPadres

        10 years ago

        I have a feeling that Norris kind of negatively affected the production of multiple pitchers this past season. Things changed a bit when hedges was called up.

        Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        10 years ago

        Hey Norris isn’t the one throwing the pitches. Do you really think Clayton Kershaw would suddenly starting sucking if he were throwing to Norris?

        Reply
  7. drum18

    10 years ago

    Cash is going to either have to part with an “untouchable” or take on some money to acquire what he wants.

    Reply
    • yanks02026

      10 years ago

      No he won’t.

      Reply
      • Kapler's Coconut Oil

        10 years ago

        Ah yes, such great insight

        Reply
  8. seamaholic 2

    10 years ago

    Big problem with trading Shields is not mentioned here. It’s his opt-out after next year. That makes it almost pointless to trade for him: If he’s good in 2016, he opts out. If he’s bad, you’re stuck with him. Lose-lose.

    I think Padres have to forget about it unless they take a Jose Reyes-level bad deal back.

    Reply
    • petefrompp

      10 years ago

      He would have to crush in 2016 to get anything better than he has- so not as bad as it sounds. But agree that Im getting something else from the padres besides shields

      Reply
      • tuner49

        10 years ago

        That may be true, depending how much money gets thrown around this winter. Remember the SP market is barren next winter.
        The point is, as a buyer, you have no control over what Shields will do after 1 year. He holds all the cards. You need to look at a Shield purchase as a 1 year deal.

        Reply
        • petefrompp

          10 years ago

          So he is worth even less- So Padres either dump him, or add prospects to get something back

          Reply
    • tuner49

      10 years ago

      You just wrote exactly what I was thinking!! Shields has the worst contract to move

      Reply
    • disgruntledreader 2

      10 years ago

      The idea that they need to or should move Shields is really stupid*. Unless there’s a structural arm issue, betting on his 3WAR early projection is a pretty smart idea. At that point, he’s providing surplus value this year and then is in a position where he either exercises the opt-out or looks reasonable for the two remaining years under contract.

      *I’d buy the argument that his beard last year was so embarrassing that he should be banished purely on principle. But from a baseball standpoint, not only would giving up on him now be dumb, but doing so without getting real value back would be absurd.

      Reply
    • rmullig2

      10 years ago

      If he opts out then you can qualify him and get the compensation pick. Not likely he would do that.

      Reply
    • YourDaddy

      10 years ago

      Just the opposite. His opt-out makes it more likely that a team will take him. Their investment is limited to 1 year at $21 million, which at a 3+ WAR he is worth that and more.

      Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        10 years ago

        So where were all the teams lined up to pay him that much money a year ago?

        Reply
      • disgruntledreader 2

        10 years ago

        Shockingly, you’re completely wrong about this.
        His opt-out puts all the risk on the acquiring club. If they give up talent in trade and he produces well, he’ll likely walk away after one year.
        If he underperforms and is not worth his contract, then he won’t opt-out.

        Reply
        • gopads

          10 years ago

          he’s got a point since he could decline dramatically in ’17 & ’18 but if that is how the team acquiring him views Shields then the Padres are getting nothing in return – but overall i dont think he is a guy that would opt out regardless of his 2016 as long as the team is competitive/playoff possible, who else besides Grienke has opted out and gotten over 20mill a year?

          Reply
  9. Stash_The_Gumbo

    10 years ago

    Julio Teheran for Gary Sanchez?

    Reply
    • Ken M.

      10 years ago

      Who else are the Braves including for Future Hall of Famer Sanchez?

      Reply
      • AidanVega123

        10 years ago

        Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. You can talk about how he is Hall of Fame worthy once he actually gets a major league hit.

        Reply
      • disgruntledreader 2

        10 years ago

        Don’t worry about the downvotes, Sloth. My monitor displays the sarcasm font.

        Reply
        • yanks02026

          10 years ago

          The guy is a troll

          Reply
          • Ken M.

            10 years ago

            I wasn’t aware this was a Yankees website. It’s a MLB site.

            Reply
            • yanks02026

              10 years ago

              Because every time theres a story about the Yankees you find a reason to bash them.

              Reply
      • meatloaf

        10 years ago

        Lol… oh please, Boston has the most over hyped prospects in baseball year after year. There’s always a new Lars Anderson and Casey Kelly for sox fans to gush over.

        Reply
    • vmmercan 2

      10 years ago

      No thanks. One extra year of control and a lot more expensive in the first three years. Braves selling low on Teheran who likely wouldn’t be a great fit transitioning to the AL East and Yankee Stadium in addition to the fact the Yankees, if they offer Nova a contract, have six starters already locked up next season. Also, the Yankees have an aging catcher behind the plate so Sanchez fills a need and they just traded JR Murphy. It makes zero sense from the Yankees’ perspective.

      Cashman will look to move Gardner and/or Miller and if he doesn’t get the value he wants for them, he will stand pat. The Yankees will buy whatever they want next year when they have a minimum of 40 million coming off the books.

      Reply
      • yanks02026

        10 years ago

        Theres ZERO chance Miller is traded.

        Reply
  10. jimbo504 2

    10 years ago

    Shields makes sense for the Cardinals.

    Reply
  11. jimbo504 2

    10 years ago

    Jon Jay for Shields, make it happen Mo.

    Reply
    • Bringbacktheblue

      10 years ago

      He sucks, we’ll take Randal Grichik

      Reply
      • jimbo504 2

        10 years ago

        Yeah that’s not happening. If the Padres really want to get rid of that contract they aren’t going to get much talent in return, moving Shields would be a salary dump. The Cardinals can take on the contract.

        Reply
  12. Otto371

    10 years ago

    Would love to see Shields in Boston, always been a fan – reunite with Price at the top of the rotation.

    Reply
    • heberts811

      10 years ago

      Bad contract for bad contract and I’m sure Sandoval can be replaced cheaper than they are paying now.

      Reply
      • disgruntledreader 2

        10 years ago

        Shields projects to produce SURPLUS value this year. Sandoval projects to have negative value this year. His contract is also for more dollars and runs longer. (The Padres also have two crappy guys who can play 3B who project to offer only slightly less production than Pablo in 2016.)
        There is no universe in which this idea makes any baseball sense.

        Reply
        • petcopadre

          10 years ago

          Solarte is crappy? Solarte was better in just about every category. You must be disgruntled.

          Reply
          • disgruntledreader 2

            10 years ago

            Outproducing what Panda did in 2015 and being crappy are certainly not mutually exclusive.
            But it sort of illustrates my point. Yangervis is pretty much just another guy who won’t make in his career what Panda gets paid next year. But he’s not a bad bet to match production over the next two seasons if they play the same amount.

            Reply
            • petcopadre

              10 years ago

              Solarte ranked 11th in offense last year according to ESPN. Not bad for a crappy 3rd baseman.

              Reply
        • SixFlagsMagicPadres

          10 years ago

          Hey, solarte was one of the few bright spots last year for the Padres.

          Reply
    • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

      10 years ago

      Not interested in Panda

      Reply
      • rmullig2

        10 years ago

        What if they threw in all of the unsold Panda hats?

        Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          10 years ago

          Sorry, just not interested in him.

          Reply
  13. bigkd1979

    10 years ago

    What about Shields in Toronto? Gets him back in the AL East where he put up decent numbers. He would have a strong offense and defense behind him. My question is what would the Jays have to give up?

    Reply
  14. ClancyJ

    10 years ago

    Shields for Ricky Nolasco

    Reply
    • disgruntledreader 2

      10 years ago

      I would think Melvin Upton for Ricky Nolasco with dollars or other parts included to even it out could actually make some degree of sense for all involved.

      Reply
  15. drewsalhus

    10 years ago

    escobar would be a good fit for the angels. play 3rd and hit in the 3 hole

    Reply
  16. hook316

    10 years ago

    Shields and 18MM prorated for three years to Tigers for Iglesias and Matt Boyd

    Reply
  17. ThorsHammer34

    10 years ago

    Quick Correction: Zobrist is a switch hitter, not a lefty

    Reply
  18. Alison Lurie

    10 years ago

    Ivan Nova for Shields

    Reply
    • vcp

      10 years ago

      Absolutely not refsnyder for sheilds

      Reply
  19. jljr222

    10 years ago

    I’m thinking Tyler Wade and Ivan Nova for Shields with the Yankees taking on the contract. I know Yankees want young cost-controlled starters, but they could still target those guys while getting a veteran starter who puts up innings. I hate the home runs allowed from 2015, but we need those innings…badly.

    Reply
  20. vpsd

    10 years ago

    I don’t expect the Padres to trade shields for another bad contract. At 3 years 63 mil he’s a bit overpaid, but not by much when you consider how much pitchers are getting right now. I expect him to bounce back with better defense next season too

    Reply
  21. Cora the Destroya

    10 years ago

    The Red Sox need to get involved with acquiring James Shields. If we can possibly move Hanley Ramirez to another team, and dump some lower prospects into San Diego, a three-way trade could bring us back Shields. I say three-way trade, because no way the Padres rest for anything short of our top prospects.

    Reply
  22. skrockij89

    10 years ago

    Seattle has Chris Taylor. Not sure if Dipoto would take on his contact though.

    Reply
    • vcp

      10 years ago

      What about the coffee seattle has that also

      Reply
  23. gopads

    10 years ago

    Shields is still a #2 in most any rotation, struck out a lot more guys last year while using his offspeed a ton more often. HomeRuns killed this guy last year and a better defense team would help his overall #’s. This guy is a valuable trade piece, priced 10 mill a year under the elite starters. I thought the Padres would keep him but make Ross their Opening Day starter. Especially since Shields is supposed to be a clubhouse leader, leader of the starters? Rockstar GM getting a headstart before round 2 in Nashville, continue to make the Padres relevant Preller! Can’t begin to guess what the return would be but he’s as valuable as any of the starters left in free agency minus Grienke over the next 3 years.

    Reply
    • bigkd1979

      10 years ago

      He’s due to get a huge bump in pay to $21 million each of the next 3 season with a $16 million club option or a $3 million buy out.

      I like Shields and honestly think he would be a good fit for the Jays as it would give them another 200 innings type pitcher but I think the money is to rich for the Jays unless the don’t have to give up major talent and allows the Jays to move Chavez to the long bullpen position. My major concern for him moving to the AL East is the fact he was susceptible to the long ball but did quite well with Rays but can he return to that level of success?

      Reply
    • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

      10 years ago

      No one wanted to give him that much money a year ago and his 2016 stats aren’t going to change their minds. Padres would have to eat some of Shields’ salary to trade him at all. The better the return, the more they would have to eat.

      Reply
      • gopads

        10 years ago

        stay tuned….before the Pads would eat money they’d take on someones modest contract but overall i think Shields has some actual value which only increases with ever starting pitcher getting big money next Cueto, Leake, Shark, Chen

        Reply
  24. Backatitagain

    10 years ago

    If the Pads want to get rid of James Shields without sending money, consider the following: Padres get Nick Markakis(3yr/31.5mil), Williams Perez(5yrs) and two contracts of Nick Swisher and Michael Bourn (1yr/31mil) for James Shields(4/79), Austin Hedges, Hunter Renfro and Travis Jankowski. Braves can throw in Daniel Castro or Gordon Beckham for SS.

    Reply
    • disgruntledreader 2

      10 years ago

      Congratulations, you’ve just come up with the stupidest trade proposal on the internet!

      Reply
      • gopads

        10 years ago

        maybe in some sort of blockbuster? just didnt know the Nationals really needed a 20 mill a year starting pitcher – they are going to want to keep Stras around & he’ll cost (now maybe some kind of trade featuring Stras & Shields would be a headliner)

        Reply
    • gopads

      10 years ago

      its interesting and took a lot of thought, Padres arent in need of dumping Shields – swisher, Bourn, Renfro & hedges in the deal sounds steep on the Padres side

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Brandon Woodruff To Start For Brewers On Sunday

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Braves Designate Alex Verdugo For Assignment

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib

    Tucker Barnhart To Retire

    Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline

    Reds Release Jeimer Candelario

    Dave Parker Passes Away

    Griffin Canning Diagnosed With Ruptured Achilles

    Pirates Reportedly Have Very Few Untouchable Players At Trade Deadline

    Griffin Canning Believed To Have Suffered Achilles Injury

    Mariners Looking For Corner Infield Bats; Ownership Willing To Bump Payroll

    Wander Franco Found Guilty Of Sexual Abuse

    Recent

    Padres Seeking Upgrades At Catcher

    Tayler Scott Elects Free Agency

    Rays Outright Forrest Whitley

    White Sox To Recall Colson Montgomery For MLB Debut

    Giants Select Sergio Alcantara

    Max Muncy Expects To Miss Around Six Weeks With Bone Bruise

    Mets To Sign Zach Pop To Major League Contract

    Dodgers Claim CJ Alexander, Designate Steward Berroa For Assignment

    Colten Brewer Opts Out Of Yankees Deal

    Royals Sign Michael Fulmer To Minor League Deal

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version