The Dodgers’ best player is a year away from hitting free agency and if they don’t lock him up by the time the 2012 season starts, it appears that he’ll test the open market. Agent Dave Stewart told Bill Plaschke of the LA Times that he hopes to complete an extension for Matt Kemp by Opening Day 2012.
"I know it is not a good thing to negotiate a contract during the course of the year; it's just not," Stewart said. "The player needs to be clear of mind and just do his job, and the organization also doesn't need the distraction."
Timing isn’t just one consideration for the Dodgers. Kemp narrowly missed a 40-40 season and is a leading candidate for the National League MVP, so we’re “talking about some pretty heavy dollars," as Stewart points out.
"If we have a concern at all, it's going to be, are we going to be able to get paid what we're trying to get," Stewart said.
There are few statistical matches for Kemp, who led the league in home runs (39), OPS+ (171), total bases (353), runs scored (115) and RBI (126) this season. The 27-year-old can look forward to "new ground" from a contractual standpoint as well.
GM Ned Colletti says the Dodgers can afford long-term deals for Kemp, Andre Ethier and Clayton Kershaw. MLBTR estimates a $16.3MM salary for Kemp in 2012, his final season before he’s eligible for free agency.
Ned better get this done, along with a deal for Kershaw too.
It’s not really up to Ned, or even Frank. In the end it’s really up to MLB.
If I were Kemp I’d want to get out of Dodger Stadium. Being a vassal of Lord McCourt, combined with the succession uncertainty, doesn’t hurt either.
As “vassals” go, he’ll be well-compensated no matter what. The only thing uncertain about the succession is who it will be, not whether it will be a much, much better situation than the current one. That part is virtually guaranteed. I’m sure Kemp and his agent have figured this out, even if many baseball fans haven’t.
He is as good as gone
my guess both Kemp and Ethier are either traded in the off season or by the trade deadline in July. Both could bring back some strong prospects for the Dodgers.
Ethier? The Sox will have their eye on him with Drew leaving and the fact that he is best friends with Pedoria and wants to play for the Sox does not hurt the Sox’s chances of either trading for him or signing him as a FA.
signing him as a FA? maybe, but that’s doubtful with the contracts we just signed after 2010.
trading for him is virtually impossible.
EDIT: misread, thought you were talking about Kemp. i don’t really care for Ethier. sox should focus on the pitching staff.
If Ned can accomplish a 6+ year extension for Matt Kemp this off-season, I’d even accept seeing Juan Uribe, A.J. Ellis and Tony Gwynn, Jr. in the Opening Day lineup. There should be no higher priority.
I don’t think this would necessarily be a good deal for the Dodgers, and maybe not even for Kemp. If he can continue to play at this level he’s probably better off in the long run reentering free agency at 29 or 30 rather than 33 or 34.
If we could lock up Kemp at $20m/year for 6 years, I think it’d be worth it.
As far as Kemp preferring a shorter deal to hit free agency in his prime… well, it is a possibility, but I kind of doubt it. After a likely MVP season, I think he’ll opt for the security of a long-term deal. His value isn’t likely to get much higher, so there is less incentive from his side to test free agency again in a few years. High risk (possibility he gets injured, etc.), low reward (versus what he could get for those same years right now).
Or he could be another Adrian Beltre and sign a big, long contract based on a single year of great peformance and never quite live up to it. Beltre might be a great model for the dilemma the Dodgers face.
120 milion ? You’re kidding, right . He is going to want at least Carl Crawford money ,( 142 million). So, Kemp is at probably at least 160 -170 million.
I can feel it. He’s gonna be a Cardinal…
And Pujols will become a Dodger. Now we both feel something.
If the Cardinals don’t resign A.P this off-season I could totally see Kemp in a Cardinal uniform. Face it, a 28 year old center fielder who’ll probably be looking for 7-8 years or a 32 year old first baseman who wants 10.
all of these people who “can’t see Kemp signing an extension” are fans of other teams who want him on their team. the guy loves playing in LA and has said he wants to be a Dodger for life. it’s up to the front office now.
True, but one of those front offices belongs to the commissioner.
Every player says he wants to be a (insert team) for life. It all comes down to cash.
Whatever Colletti and the brass say, I really don’t see The Dodgers having enough money to sign someone like Kemp, particularly after coming off a MVP season.
Once McCourt see’s the figures from Kemp’s agent, he will have a heart attack. New ownership quicker than most think possible.
Does anyone else have a feeling this is going to end up like a Jose Reyes type of situation. I don’t know, I have a feeling the Dodgers want to re-sign him but Kemp is like……****, This club’s headed nowhere, I might as well leave after the year since Andre isn’t coming back. Damn, we don’t even have a farm system
I doubt it. He’s like royalty in L.A. now. Granted, I’m sure any fanbase would love to have Kemp on their team, but he’s really become the face of the Dodgers franchise at this point, and I get the feeling he enjoys it. He was drafted by the Dodgers and he’s made the team his own. I don’t think he’s at the point in his career where he’s just thinking about getting on a championship team. He’s become friendly with other L.A. sports figures and celebrities and seems attached to the city.
I’m fairly confident he’d be willing to sign in L.A. long-term and at a reasonable rate. The question is whether McCourt and Colletti will find it reasonable… and how many decades they want to defer the salary.
i agree…just look at his twitter page…everybody loves and supports him in LA and he definitely enjoys it!!