The Royals’ payroll will “regress” in 2017, according to GM Dayton Moore, as Rustin Dodd of the Kansas City Star reports. While Kansas City still intends to push to put a winner on the field after a disappointing, .500 campaign, it will face significant monetary restraints in finding ways to improve.
Dodd provides an extensive breakdown of the organization’s financial situation. The club carried approximately $135MM on its payroll on Opening Day of 2016, and is currently lined up to land near that team-record number as things stand (with arbitration raises factored in).
That kind of outlay, Moore suggested, is not likely. “This [2016] payroll was put together with going deep in the postseason [in mind],” said Moore. “That didn’t happen. Again, I’m accountable for that. It’s not going to look very good on the spreadsheet when the bill comes due.”
Looking ahead, it seems, there’s little chance that Kansas City will further bump that spending. If anything, it seems, the inclination may be to find ways to save. “[W]e’ll have to re-evaluate that, probably reorganize, take some steps back,” Moore explained. “We’re going to have to look internally and [in] trades,” he went on to add. “We won’t be adding money. That’s for darn sure.”
That will make for a challenge as K.C. seeks to return to contention. Certainly, better health and better play from key veterans could make a significant difference. But Moore cited an interest in bolstering the back of the pen and boosting the offense, which could require identifying the right internal talent and pursuing what Moore referred to as “creative” trade scenarios. He largely rejected the idea of adding salary in free agency after making some rather substantial outlays last winter.
Certainly, the totality of the comments seem to suggest that some change could be afoot. Key players such as Lorenzo Cain, Eric Hosmer, Mike Moustakas, Danny Duffy, Wade Davis, and Alcides Escobar are entering their final seasons of team control. While praising the organizational core, Moore said that the front office “also recognize[s] the need to maybe mix it up a little bit.”
Improving on offense will be a particular challenge given that the Royals may soon bid adieu to Kendrys Morales, their most productive hitter in 2016. He’s unlikely to pick up his side of a $10MM mutual option, and while the club could theoretically slap a qualifying offer on him, that would represent a big risk given the aforementioned financial constraints.
Moore suggested that it’s still an open question how things will play out with Morales, but it seems difficult to imagine a way to accommodate his return. “We’ll just keep all of our options open,” Moore said. “But he’s a player that we’re very proud of. He’s a big part of our success. We would love to have him back. I just don’t know if it will work at this point in time.”
No way they extend a qualifying offer to Morales. Moore spent money from the spoils of World Series runs. Scaling back in payroll would seem logical.
One year from now the Royals will pull off the biggest fire sale since the ’97 Marlins.
we need to sell davis or hosmer or extend hosmer, we could get a pretty hefty reward, trade davis and hosmer to the nationals we will get Trea Turner (hit .350, 13 homers-40 Rbi and 33 stolen bases (48 games)
You seem pretty sure about that. Why would two guys with only one year of control left get you Turner?
Lol! Those guys don’t come anywhere near Turner. Hosmer had a negative fWAR this year… He’s essentially a replacement level first baseman on a one year deal. He has zero value
^ the “bargaining” phase of dealing with death.
Hosmer might be the most overrated player in the league! He had a 101 ops plus last year. Even adding Davis to him wouldn’t get turner
Yea, he’s overrated…
Three-time Gold Glover, hit one-out triple and scored tying run in 12th inning of 2014 Wild Card game and hit GW homer in extras of Game 2 of ALDS in 2014, Hit another homer in clincher of the same series. Batted .400 in ALCS in 2014. Had huge hit in big comeback in game four of the 2015 ALDS and then put it away with a homer in the 9th. Drove in the winning run in the clinching Game 6 of the ALCS and then drove in the game winner in Game 1 of the 2015 World Series. You may remember how he doubled off of Matt Harvey in the 9th inning of Game 5 of the same series and scored the tying run as the Royals won the World Series. He’s a tremendous leader, he just set career highs in homers and RBI’s, he’s only going to be 27 on Opening Day in 2017 and he has 29 RBI’s and 18 runs scored in 31 post-season games.
But yea, he might be the most overrated player in the league…
Hosmer actually grades as a below average defensive first baseman. His career postseason ops is actually only .732 despite your claims of postseason accolades. Career highs in homers and rbis and yet his ops was below his career average. This is similar to a lot of cubs fans and their opinions of starlin castro, they would always mention his all star games and hit totals as proof of his excellence and ignore literally everything else.
Baseball really needs to find a way to fix this crap. the game was its greatest during the period after the draft was started and before free agency. When the teams that won were the best ran. While having deep pockets don’t equal championships it certainly helps keep competitive teams on the field and overcome contract mistakes.
Baseball needs to go to complete revenue sharing including tv/radio contracts. No team should have even a cent of monetary advantage over any other.
Just tired of seeing teams get there and have just a one or two year window to make it happen while a team like the Dodgers or Yankees can blow money miss and just throw even more money.
I’m just glad that the Royals got a championship out of this because they likely are going to have a difficult time getting back to the playoffs for the next decade, because they aren’t going to be able to bring in impact talent because they can’t spend money, but will also likely be just good enough to land in the middle of the draft while still missing the playoffs for years.
They’ll have to retool for a couple years I think. Moore wisely put money into a somewhat small window of contention and it resulted in a WS ring and darn close to two.
The Even Smaller market Brewers dismantled their team, turned over 21 of their 40 roster spots, cut payroll to some ridiculous level like $65 million and….
proceeded to win 5 more games than the year prior.
It is indeed much, much harder to build a winner in a small market but finding and developing talent is an art form, not a science.
I think there does need to be some type of salary cap and floor in the MLB. The NBA, NHL, and NFL all have some form of a salary cap. It makes it really hard for small market teams to have any chance of sustained success. I would say the Royals did about the best you can do in a small market over the last three or four years, but that is going to come to an end really quick with many key players reaching free agency after this year.
The Yankees have had a winning season for 23 straight seasons. I wonder why that is? It is not like the Yankees have some far superior scouting, drafting, and player development. Spending money doesn’t necessarily mean world series wins, but it does usually mean playoff appearances. And you obviously need to be in the playoffs to win the World Series.
Some people say rebuild like the Cubs, and you will be able to have sustained success. Really? The Cubs have a payroll of $170. What small market team has a $170 million pay role?
The cards are really stacked against small market teams. Small and mid market teams best chance is to try and catch lighting in a bottle for a couple years, which can become pretty disheartening as a small/mid market fan.
I would argue that small/mid market teams, even if they play everything perfect, usually only have a two or three year window to have a legitimate chance at winning a world series. That is not the case for the larger market teams.
I definitely won’t disagree that imho the odds are stacked against small market teams. How can you compete in the same manner as they big market teams do? The answer is you can’t in the exact same manner.
Just a few rough numbers from a google search:
NYC metro population 2015 estimated census: 20.2 million people
Tampa/St. Pete metro population 2012 estimated census 4,310,524
so with 2 teams in the NYC area hypothetically split evenly that gives you in excess of 10 million potential fans per team…well more than 2x as many for Tampa to pull from. Of course the big market teams will have more money.
Maybe the next time MLB wants to expand it looks to add another team in places like NY, Boston, Chicago and LA…that would do a lot towards helping towards parity (and no I don’t expect that will happen soon, nor do I think the powers that be in major league baseball truly desire any sort of parity.
You are missing the point. There needs to be a salary cap, even though the players will never want to agree to it.
You point out the cubs payroll of 170, they didn’t need to bump that payroll… They are still a playoff team without signing Hayward and zobrist which puts them directly in line with the royals payroll… P.s. that payroll includes them still paying Edwin Jackson.
Back to the actual topic here, which is the Royals and their issues. Most people in baseball knew they had a small window to succeed based on their core and the cost associated. They had a bunch of young, cost controlled players and a 3-4 yr window before players got expensive. Now they are there, and need to re-stock or reload some.
The Royals and Braves match up as usual, with several trade possibilities. With the Braves rebuilt farm system and the amount of cash they have to play with they could easily line up to take on higher salary/limited control guys and then refill KC with a number of players.
Maybe something for Duffy, or Kennedy or Soria for some of our younger arms. Blair, Jenkins, Gant, Ellis or Whalen could be put in some sort of package maybe with Markakis.
Stop trying to trade markakis. No one wants him. He holds no value.
I’m not 100% on the Markakis has no value bandwagon – I think he is fine for what he is, if a bit over priced – but this doesn’t make sense for either team.
The Royals don’t want to be adding additional payroll (Markakis) and the Braves are just on the brink of coming out of their own rebuild. Why tear it down now for one year contracts? I guess they could make the trade with an eye to re-sign, but they could just as easily get them as a FA at the point if they were willing to spend the cash. The Braves are not going to contend in 2017 (sorry, Coppy), so why break the bank for a splurge on players with expiring control?
How about trading Gordon and Davis and all their remaining money to Toronto for Dalton Pompey and a lower level pitcher.