Headlines

  • Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On The Top Remaining Free Agent Starters

By Steve Adams | March 2, 2018 at 12:44pm CDT

The Nationals reportedly remain open to adding to their roster before the season begins, and while they’ve been oft-linked to top remaining free agent Jake Arrieta, Jorge Castillo of the Washington Post reports that the Nats “haven’t engaged with Arrieta’s camp recently.” The Nationals, it seems (much like the rest of baseball), would be likelier to jump into the fray if Arrieta’s price drops.

Castillo does note that at least three other clubs have made recent inquiries with Arrieta’s agent, Scott Boras. One of those is likely the Phillies, who are reported to have an ongoing dialogue with Boras regarding Arrieta. However, most reports out of Philadelphia suggest that the Phils are loath to go beyond three years for the former NL Cy Yong winner, who will pitch this season at age 32 and has displayed some signs of decline in recent years — most notably a loss of velocity and worsened K/BB rates.

Alternatives for the Nats, Phillies and other clubs searching for rotation upgrades are still on the market in the form of Alex Cobb and Lance Lynn, who both remain unsigned. Todd Zolecki of MLB.com writes, however, that the Phils are even less likely to sign Cobb or Lynn to a long-term deal than they are Arrieta (and again reports that the Phils don’t want to go past three years for Arrieta). Even a contract in the vicinity of Tyler Chatwood’s three-year, $38MM pact with the Cubs could be too rich for the Phillies’ tastes when it comes to Lynn and Cobb, Zolecki writes.

It seems that virtually every club in need of rotation help is awaiting the asking price on the top three starters to drop. The Athletic’s Jim Bowden tweets that both Cobb and Lynn are still seeking guarantees worth more than $50MM. (It’s worth pointing out that the manner in which that report frames draft compensation is inaccurate; the draft/international penalty for signing any of Arrieta, Cobb or Lynn is not tied to that $50MM figure, but a deal of $50MM or more would improve the compensation for the teams losing those players.)

The Orioles, Brewers, Phillies and Twins all hold varying levels of interest in Cobb and/or Lynn, Bowden notes, but not at the current asking price. The Twins’ level of interest in Lynn doesn’t appear to be especially high at this point, though. While Darren Wolfson of 1500 ESPN walks back a recent report a bit by tweeting that Minnesota’s offer to Lynn was for more than the $12MM he initially reported, he adds that it was nonetheless well shy of anything his camp considered and that there are no current talks between the two sides.

Share 0 Retweet 8 Send via email0

Baltimore Orioles Milwaukee Brewers Minnesota Twins Philadelphia Phillies Washington Nationals Alex Cobb Jake Arrieta Lance Lynn

The Inner Monologue of @DimTillard W.W.N.R.D.
Main
Reds Claim Jairo Labourt From Tigers
View Comments (78)
Post a Comment

78 Comments

  1. brewcrew08

    7 years ago

    These guys aren’t even going to have a job come opening day. The longer they “hold out” the worse their leverage get. Do they not realize there are 4-5 teams at most interested? None of which are big spenders outside of Washington.

    1
    Reply
    • davbee

      7 years ago

      A couple of key pitchers get hurt and suddenly the unsigned pitchers value increases. Waiting it out might not be a bad strategy.

      11
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        7 years ago

        Exactly. Pomerantz just left due to tightness. Hopefully not serious but It’s sad that players didn’t see the adjustment coming and most will now be taking a beating. Most have no one to blame but themselves and their agents. What may end up being good for fans (but not for MLBTR) is many more players may now be willing to sign extensions like years back. Maybe not most of the very top like Betts but yes even some of those too.

        Reply
        • Coast1

          7 years ago

          This makes sense if the issue is 2018 salary. A desperate team will up their offer for this year. I don’t think the need for a 2018 starter will cause a team to make a 5 year offer instead of 3. That seems like a lot of money to pay for needing a starter for a few months.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          7 years ago

          Teams now believe it’s best to pay more avg wise for less years. The problem teams like Boston will have is they will have dead money on future years. When JDM opts out, the difference in the avg assessed and what was paid goes on the following year’s books. Guess they timed the hit to offset when other contracts also come off.

          Reply
      • chgobangbang

        7 years ago

        Waiting it out for injury may be the only strategy they have left? That or wait till date compensation of draft choice expires and see what interest they’ll have. What is that date June 1?

        1
        Reply
        • Michael Chaney

          7 years ago

          Once the draft is over, so yeah it would be around the beginning of June

          Reply
      • atomicfront

        7 years ago

        It will take them 6 weeks from the time they are signed until they ready to pitch in big league games. Just pick their best offer or they are going to look at lower and lower returns.

        1
        Reply
      • One Fan

        7 years ago

        Its a terrible strategy

        Reply
    • waxbuddie

      7 years ago

      Yeah I feel the same, but I suppose part of the strategy may be waiting for an injury to occur which almost always seems to happen during spring training

      2
      Reply
    • bigjonliljon

      7 years ago

      Agreed. Not to mention the track record of pitchers signing this late isn’t good. Behind every one one else in conditioning as well as learning there catcher, etc. injuries and poor performance in the past

      1
      Reply
  2. Tiger_diesel92

    7 years ago

    Phillies do have money and so does the orioles it’s calling being cheap.

    Reply
    • dirtydan

      7 years ago

      For the Phillies it’s called rebuilding. They’re not cheap at all they just know when to spend their money.

      2
      Reply
      • Robertowannabe

        7 years ago

        Not wishing to overspend for a pitcher in their 30’s is more in vogue now and not so much cheap. Obviously the pitchers all want 5-7 years for contract length. If it were my team, I would not want to pay 7 years guaranteed for a guy like Arrieta. Already has show some regression and not the same guy he was 2 years ago. That version of Jake would have commanded the big bucks. The current version not so much.

        3
        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          7 years ago

          The test on the future market of starting pitchers might be the extension/new contract Kershaw gets. Avg will obviously be up there but for how many years?

          Reply
        • bravesfan88

          7 years ago

          Kershaw is in a league of his own, followed by only a handful of pitchers. His contract will have a very minimal impact on what #2’s, #3’s, and #4 starting pitchers receive in the future.

          The fact is with so many teams going towards analytics, and having that mindset decide their decisions in free agency, GM’s are ALOT less willing to pay based on past success. This is especially the case with pitchers, entering their mid 30’s, like Arrieta.

          Teams before, would pay Arrieta his big money, not really caring that they’d be stuck with a bad contract in 3-4 seasons..They’d want him as their #2-#3 guy now, and take that added security at the expense of future financial flexibility…Well, that’s not happening anymore..

          Now, teams will take a guy like Arrieta and say look man, you’re not getting any better..If you want a high annual average, then you’ll take our 2-3 year deal…If you want longer security, then we want the same security, and you’ll get a good bit less money…

          The pitchers that will really suffer are the mediocre guys, wanting another good deal that runs through their early to mid 30’s seasons..

          It’s the new way of thinking for GM’s, and unfortunately this group of Free Agents are paying the untimely consequences…

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          7 years ago

          Kershaw sets the bar so to speak. He also has a lot of mileage and recent injury history. Should be interesting as my guess is they will find a creative middle ground at a huge yearly avg but one that contains mutual protection, not just player. What hasn’t been mentioned is the cost of injury insurance. As salaries escalate so does the insurance and with the recent number of arm injuries such may actually not be available.

          Reply
  3. Travis’ Wood

    7 years ago

    Jim Bowden is beyond clueless. A former GM who has no idea how the qualifying offer works. He even says it was “according to sources”…. so he’s either making stuff up or his sources are brain dead. Lol

    2
    Reply
    • bigcubsfan

      7 years ago

      I may be Jim Bowen’s reputable source. I tell him swingy-swingy game “secrets”! Like Arrieta will sign with the Marlins, Moustakas will sign with Colorado, Lynn will give up and go to Japan. Oh, how funny man this is, he believes swingy-swingy secrets. Oh fun! I tell him Chubs were able to trade Heyward for Harper, he leaped out of his seat, and went to Tweeter haha!

      Reply
    • barkinghumans77

      7 years ago

      Ya, his source is himself… “According to 1 former GM”… Lol

      1
      Reply
  4. canajay12

    7 years ago

    At this point a 4 year 56MM deal for Cobb or Lynn would have me as a blue Jays fan. We don’t have a clear need but let’s face it Sanchez, Stroman, happ, Estrada aren’t all staying healthy

    Reply
    • michaelw

      7 years ago

      That’s way way too much for either Cobb or Lynn.

      2
      Reply
      • hawaiiphil

        7 years ago

        correct—lucky to get 3 yrs $45mil

        2
        Reply
        • greatgame 2

          7 years ago

          Even that is a huge risky overpay

          Reply
  5. Michael Birks

    7 years ago

    Pomerantz just left the game with a forearm issue…. Boston might just be in the market for a starter

    Reply
    • Solaris601

      7 years ago

      I’ve felt Lynn would be the best fit for BOS. He’s a mid-rotation innings eater who’s unspectacular, but dependable, and has post season experience. Arrieta is ideal, but the price in years and dollars is a bridge too far even for the Red Sox.

      Reply
      • Michael Birks

        7 years ago

        Funny, I had been thinking the same thing about Lynn as the off-season wore on, I wondered/wonder if his price would drop enough for Boston to consider making an offer

        Reply
      • Bert17

        7 years ago

        I agree. They’ve already got their projected 5 and 6 starters beginning the season on the DL and neither are reliable to begin with.

        Since the Sox weren’t over the tax last year, they’d only lose the second round draft pick (and $500k of international money) for signing any of the QO free agents. If they signed Lynn or Cobb, they could turn around and trade E.Rod for more value in prospects than a second rounder and and what 500K buys on the international market.

        Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        7 years ago

        Eating inner is Steven Wright when he returns. Latest word is good. Rodriguez also but I’m not too high on him staying healthy. He probably has nothing left but I’d consider a cheap flyer on Lackey if anyone.

        Reply
  6. Polish Hammer

    7 years ago

    Cy Yong winner? And two egg rolls please..

    Reply
  7. DanielDannyDano

    7 years ago

    Here come the pillow contracts.

    Reply
  8. SG

    7 years ago

    The QO, loss of draft pick, is a price most top tier teams are unwilling to deal with.

    Here are this year’s free agents who were extended a qualifying offer:

    Jake Arrieta, SP, Cubs
    Lorenzo Cain, OF, Royals
    Alex Cobb, SP, Rays
    Wade Davis, RP, Cubs
    Greg Holland, RP, Rockies
    Eric Hosmer, 1B, Royals
    Lance Lynn, SP, Cardinals
    Mike Moustakas, 3B, Royals
    Carlos Santana, 1B, Indians

    Notice that many are still FA’s.
    The QO may have to go.
    There are too many good players, listed above, that should have been signed by now and likely have been impacted by the QO rule.

    I would like to hear what the justification is for the QO, from the teams standpoint?
    Why should an old team have preferential treatment over all of the other teams?
    1 year QO’s are a joke.
    A 3 year $50M QO offer seems much fairer for both the player and for other competing teams.

    2
    Reply
    • Michael Chaney

      7 years ago

      This has nothing to do with the qualifying offer. Besides, a rebuilding team (the Phillies) gave up a pick to sign a first baseman on the wrong side of 30 (Santana). The QO and subsequent compensation aren’t even close to why these guys are still unsigned.

      It’s because the guys that are still on the market are significantly overvaluing themselves. That’s it.

      5
      Reply
      • swinging wood

        7 years ago

        It has some to do with the QO. Maybe not as much in years past, but still material.

        2
        Reply
        • srechter

          7 years ago

          I agree. It’s a combo of both issues.

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          7 years ago

          Absolutely a combination. Players rejected $17M QO and have bruised egos when it’s their ego that often brings out the best in an athlete. Arrieta will probably do ok on an avg basis but short years. Others though will probably take a beating.

          1
          Reply
      • Pax vobiscum

        7 years ago

        The Phillies first round pick is protected.

        Reply
    • BrewCrew82

      7 years ago

      All the QO does is make the offer from other teams less. If you think those players don’t have deals on the table pending their approval you are nuts. The teams have interests but need to take care of themselves too.

      Reply
    • st1300b 2

      7 years ago

      The QO was about 17 mil for one season. Pretty sure they would take that now.
      The home team has a right to offer a very strong offer to keep their fans favorites in town.

      1
      Reply
  9. Omarj

    7 years ago

    I’d say Dodgers, Twins, Angels, make Arietta a 1 yr strong 1 yr offer.

    1
    Reply
    • ray_derek

      7 years ago

      That he would immediately decline.

      Reply
    • SG

      7 years ago

      Yes, I too was wondering the logic of doing that?
      Why would a team give up a 1st round draft pick for only a 1 year contract with Arrieta?
      And why would Arrietta accept only a 1 year offer when he declined a 1 year QO and he could get a 4 year deal?

      Reply
  10. wscaddie56

    7 years ago

    If I’m the brewers, I offer 3/$45 M to Cobb and Lynn. If next summer goes the way people think, those will look like really good value at that point. Arrietta gets a 1/$20-25M offer from me.
    I’d be ecstatic if any of those guys sign those deals.

    Reply
    • BrewCrew82

      7 years ago

      Cobb is better than Lynn. Lynn’s stuff has been getting worse and worse over time and isn’t worth 12/yr much less 15.

      Reply
      • bigcubsfan

        7 years ago

        The Cardinals seemed to think he was worth at least the qualifying offer amount. (greater than $12 million.) I don’t think the Cardinals are 100% Stew Pidd.

        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          7 years ago

          They likely gave the QO believing he’d reject it just to get the CP. That’s true in many of the cases. Next CBA will probably have changes. Another lister suggested 3/$50M. Not sure of the amount but that seems about right. Look at the list of those that were given the QO and think about how many wouldn’t have been. Some would certainly have been offered more by now. Do you think the Mets would have given him what he got if there additionally was compensation? Expect the rules to also be changed to eliminate or modify the rule that removes compensation if the player is traded.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          7 years ago

          *Mets-Jay Bruce

          Reply
  11. Rickeo02

    7 years ago

    Orioles’ are a shame

    2
    Reply
    • lord vincent

      7 years ago

      Where did that come from? Nobody mention the O’s

      Reply
    • CowboysoldierFTW

      7 years ago

      They may be but that was random.

      Reply
  12. mike156

    7 years ago

    Signing Cobb or Lynn for 3/$42 is a perfectly reasonable gamble. If you can get them cheaper, so much the better.
    And, there’s a price at which Arrieta is a reasonable gamble, but it’s going to be higher than 3/$42–significantly higher. If the signing team gets the second half 2017 pitching it’s worth a lot more than that, and Arietta can’t commit himself to what’s likely to be his last big score for that kind of money.

    2
    Reply
  13. stevetampa

    7 years ago

    I’m 3/75 for Arrieta with a 4th year vesting based on IPs

    2/30 for either Cobb or Lynn with similar vesting option

    3
    Reply
    • Coast1

      7 years ago

      I wouldn’t give up a draft pick for a 2 year contract with a vesting option. I’d much rather have a team option. A player can hit a vesting option even if he isn’t worth it as long as he’s healthy.

      1
      Reply
      • bhambravesfan

        7 years ago

        That is people overvaluing prospects. What are the odds that the #12 pick for instance turns in the production that Arrieta would over the next two years. Arrieta is no ones #4 here

        Reply
        • mustache101

          7 years ago

          It’s not the “pick” that’s damaging it’s the money allotment from the draft spot that scares teams off… they use that money later in the draft to sign committed hs players and lure them from there commitment… it could potentially cost you that lost pick and possibly 1-2 high upside committed players (each with six years of cheap control you only have to hit on one to come out ahead) also that are takin later in the draft… AND it costs you the money of said signed player ex.. you sign Arrieta for 4/100… you lose the pick and the chance to sign 2 other later draft picks because you lost the slot money.. that’s potentialy 3 players you lost.. AND you have 25 mil more on your payroll annually… making it harder to do a team friendly extension with a current player not yet in arbitration due to payroll restrictions… if it wins you a ws it’s great if it don’t it could impact your club for years to come… that’s why teams are shy….the signing team gets hit twice… once for payroll and again during the draft let alone international slot money that can be lost also… that’s another loss for some teams.. so your thought of it’s just a draft pick is flawed… if the team was only charged a pick but was allowed to keep the slot money allotted to the pick and not be penilized internationally these players would get signed a lot faster

          2
          Reply
        • Gripper

          7 years ago

          I agree the money could be used later “if” they sign the pick way under slot. If they sign at slot, there is nothing left. If they don’t sign the player in that slot they lose the money. Doubtful you will get 1 or 2 HS players later unless the slot pick signs way under and that doesn’t happen much.

          Reply
    • hawaiiphil

      7 years ago

      i could see arrieta getting an offer from phils– 4 yrs–
      $23mil yr 1 &2, player option 3rd yr @ $20mil, but 4th yr being team option at 17mil.

      1st 2 yrs are fairly valued, he gets option to take the $20mil for 3rd yr if he stinks in yr 2 or market is not there for him for yr 3, then phils get option to keep him cheap in yr 4 if he has a resurgence in yr 3.

      1
      Reply
  14. twinsguy69

    7 years ago

    Twins are basically blue balling their fans. Taking us to the brink of contention but leaving us just a step short. Give us the happy ending we so richly deserve Falvey!

    3
    Reply
    • TwinsVet

      7 years ago

      Falvey is looking bigger than 2018. Be patient, embrace the process. We’re on the upswing and the future is bright.

      Reply
    • HonestFeedback

      7 years ago

      Or they know that you’ll crucify them for that “stupid signing” when these guys are dead money in a few years.

      Reply
  15. rolafaive

    7 years ago

    Wow and they cry collusion,I realize you probably only get one shot in your career for the big payday, but lets get real here.

    1
    Reply
  16. jobusrum9

    7 years ago

    Imagine if Jeter and the fish weren’t trying to get payroll down to $55mil. They could of very easily added some really good arms to their already potent offense for peanuts this off-season.
    Basically if they could of found a way to move Prado and his 2years $30mil, Volquez has $13mil, Chen is outrageous at something like 4/$68mil if you include the player option, that’s not even including guys like Ziegler, Tazawa, etc… guys who are getting close to $10mil season.
    Those players alone are wasting around $50mil per season. Just getting rid of half of them would of allowed the fish to add both Cobb and Lynn to their rotation this off-season.
    While not extremely top heavy that rotation could of easily won a WS with the lineup they already had in place and all could of been done for less then $110mil per season in total payroll.
    Urena
    Straily
    Cobb
    Lynn
    Chen(if he couldn’t be moved)
    Conley (if they moved Chen)
    -Lineup
    Gordon
    Yelich
    Ozuna
    Stanton
    Bour
    Realmuto
    Dietrich
    Rojas/Anderson
    That’s a hell of a team for around $100mil. Better then most of the teams in the league that are paying over $150mil per season.

    1
    Reply
  17. padam

    7 years ago

    Problems are:

    1. Teams that have money are rebuilding and Arrieta alone wouldn’t make a difference.
    2. Teams that are rebuilding typically wouldn’t want to give up their picks.
    3. Big market teams are all tied up with big contracts. Luxury tax would be an issue.
    4. His ask for years and dollars at his age aren’t a wise investment over the long term for anyone interested.

    He’s in a bad spot. Especially with other options out there and still available.

    2
    Reply
  18. Hot Corner

    7 years ago

    Arrietta is, in my opinion, not a good fit for the Nats. They don’t need him. The Nationals are the best team in the national league and the only thing that was holding them back (Dusty Baker) is now gone. If the Nationals sign anyone it should be Lucroy and that’s it. Did I make any grammar mistakes?

    2
    Reply
    • Bryzzo2016

      7 years ago

      Hahaha, best team in the National League? They can’t even win a playoff series. The Cubs and Dodgers are the class of the NL. There’s a reason that played each other in the NLCS the last two years, there is a reason the Cubs have gone to 3 straight NLCS. I see no reason why it won’t be a 4th straight trip and it’s a safe bet it will be the 3rd for the Dodgers.

      1
      Reply
    • michaelw

      7 years ago

      I agree on the Luc deal. The Nats are NOT the best team in the NL – Really it is pretty tight between LAD, Chi and Wash no matter what you want to believe or deny. Paper means nothing. I do think they are neck and neck in pitching. I personally like Mad Max over CK – I think CK has hit his peak. No doubt still one of the best if not the best but I think Max is right there on his tail. CK has been hurt now for a few years. This year will be the tale of the tape. he also getting older.
      Pitching wise I still give it to the Nats. Chi close. I think Wood and Hill over achieved last year, and that won’t be a repeat of this year. CK still CK.

      As far as hitting I don’t think Wash is not the best.

      The ranking as of the end of 2017 were
      Chi 4, Wash 5 LAD 12 Hitting
      In Pitching it was LAD2, Wash 6 Chi 7

      So I disagree there. They are all pretty even no matter what you want to think. I agree The Nats have NOT won a play off series. This is the last chance for Wash. so until they do they have proved nothing.

      1
      Reply
      • michaelw

        7 years ago

        So as you can see Hot Corner they are pretty much dead even –
        Wash 6 Chi 7 in pitching
        Chi 4 Wash 5 in pitching.

        Which is probably why the series went 5 games down to the wire.

        (Theses sortable stats mean a lot when it comes to a whole team. Not so much as a player. But tells the tale of the tape for how a team is.

        LAD were 2nd in pitching but they hit a HOT Astro team who were ranked #1 in hitting last year.

        When the Cubs won it all in 2016 The Cubs ranked #1 in Pitching and #2 in Hitting which is why the won 103 games and the WS.

        Usually if your in the top 4 in pitching and top 10 in batting you will get far in post season. That is the measuring tape. Not we have this guy or that guy.

        Just remember the Cubs added Darvish, Marrow and 3 other Pen guys this year vs a bad season last year well if you call being ranked #7 in pitching bad – I wouldn’t count on Wash yet. I agree LAD and Cubs will meet for the 3rd straight year.

        Please tell me the last time a team went to 4 straight NLCS. You have to back up to 70’s I believe. Maybe the Great depression. Then to the 60’s.

        People make fun of the Cubs but yet they have records no one will break. They may only have 3 WS but they still have 17 NL pennants which is 4th best in the National league. That is two less than St.L for all their bragging rights lol. Which the Cubs still own the over all series against them. They still own the best regular season record in all of MLB since 2015. SO PSSSSF the Nats. Nats Play off appearances 4 games series won ZERO witha big Z in your FRO! lol

        1
        Reply
  19. dunham

    7 years ago

    The problem with starting pitching nowadays, is these guys can’t even handle 6 innings anymore. That’s why middle relievers are getting paid and starter pay is on the decline.

    2
    Reply
  20. astros_fan_84

    7 years ago

    Who actually wants their team to “win” the services of these starters? Most fans are hoping some other GM caves and overspends. Arrieta is declining, Cobb is not durable, and Lynn’s era from last year looks like a mirage.

    These guys all look like #4’s. They just aren’t worth big bucks and few teams have big bucks for SPs that are likely to get hurt are have a 4.5+ era.

    1
    Reply
  21. chesteraarthur

    7 years ago

    I wonder if Jake would take something like 5 years @ 50 guaranteed with performance escalators that could bring it up to 150m on the very, very slim chance he manages to be a quality pitcher for all 5 of those years

    Reply
    • Bryzzo2016

      7 years ago

      THAT would be betting on himself for sure, Boras would never let him agree to it though.

      1
      Reply
    • michaelw

      7 years ago

      the odds of that happening are 1 and billion lol. That is 10 Mil a year – you can’t role the dice on performance at his age that low. Someone said it perfect, Boras – would never do that in a million years.

      He will never get 200 or even 175 or even 160 at this point. Probably not even 150.

      I’m betting 4 years 92 and that being generous with an opt out on the 3rd year.
      If he is lucky and someone gets hurt durning ST he may beable to get a 5 year 120 deal – but doubtful

      Reply
  22. Gripper

    7 years ago

    I agree the money could be used later “if” they sign the pick way under slot. If they sign at slot, there is nothing left. If they don’t sign the player in that slot they lose the money. Doubtful you will get 1 or 2 HS players later unless the slot pick signs way under and that doesn’t happen much.

    Reply
  23. jd396

    7 years ago

    So does this mean Arrieta might not get $200m?

    2
    Reply
  24. Cardinals17

    7 years ago

    It would be a pure shame if Lance Lynn did not get signed before the opening day of MLB. The guy currently has the best winning percentage of the entire Cardinals staff during his tenure with the Cardinals. With the exception of his year out with Tommy John, Lance Lynn a has been a durable consistent starter and a tops Innings eater. The MLB radio/Television Network are currently questioning all of the curious, irrational moves or rather non-movement of the Cardinals front office to further improve their team to become contenders this season. Signing Lance Lynn back would have made a lot more sense and money well spent rather than the dumpster diving Mozeliak has done after the Ozuna deal.

    Reply
    • Bryzzo2016

      7 years ago

      You lost me at winning% No one with any real knowledge of the game looks at W/L when evaluating a SP.

      1
      Reply
    • michaelw

      7 years ago

      Then why wont the Cards sign him? They sure could use him.

      1
      Reply
      • Dad

        7 years ago

        Because Matheny doesn’t like him and he’s a wiseass to the press. Add that he seldom gets out of the sixth , taxes the bullpen ( innings eater doesn’t pass my eye test ) throws the MOST fastballs of any MLB pitcher and that’s why STL. Won’t resign him

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Recent

    Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony

    Red Sox Designate Robert Stock For Assignment, Select Brian Van Belle

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat: Today At 2pm CT

    Rich Hill Has June 15 Opt-Out In Royals Deal

    AJ Smith-Shawver Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Poll: What Will The Rangers Do At The Deadline?

    Mets Select Justin Garza

    Submit Your Questions For This Week’s Episode Of The MLBTR Podcast

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    The Opener: Phillies, Wade, Perez, Dodgers, Padres

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version