Headlines

  • Red Sox Acquire Caleb Durbin In Six-Player Trade
  • Pirates To Sign Marcell Ozuna
  • Rays To Sign Nick Martinez
  • Mets To Sign MJ Melendez
  • Yankees To Re-Sign Paul Goldschmidt
  • Tarik Skubal Wins Arbitration Hearing
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

MLB Owners Approve John Seidler As Padres’ Control Person

By Steve Adams | February 6, 2025 at 11:52am CDT

John Seidler, the brother of late Padres chairman Peter Seidler, was unanimously approved as the team’s new control person in a vote among the league’s other 29 owners, Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune reports. The move will become official once the paperwork naming John the trustee of Peter’s trust is finalized in about a month’s time, Acee adds.

Padres ownership has been embroiled in a legal battle in recent months, as Peter’s widow, Sheel Seidler, has filed suit against her late husband’s brothers, alleging that they’ve breached fiduciary duty and committed fraud as successors of Peter’s trust. Sheel Seidler accused brothers-in-law Matt and Bob Seidler of selling assets to themselves “far” below market prices in an effort to consolidate control of the franchise and of violating Peter’s wishes that she serve as interim control person of the club before passing ownership onto the couple’s children at a later date.

Matt Seidler contested the suit in a formal response wherein he accused his sister-in-law of attempting to “manufacture claims against the Trustees in pursuit of the control that Peter intentionally chose not to give her.” Per Matt’s response, the trust has made numerous transactions, totaling tens of millions of dollars, benefiting Sheel and her children.

Sheel’s attorney suggested in a statement that the Seidler brothers have no evidence to support claims of wrongdoing by his client: “It’s ironic that they accuse Sheel — Peter’s wife of two decades and the mother of his three children — of misusing his assets, while at the same time they have reaped the benefits of Peter’s generosity for decades. The fact is, we will win in court because the defendants have shown they have no case.”

To date, Matt’s formal response to Sheel’s lawsuit is the only on-record comment provided by any of the brothers. John was not present for and has not issued comment on today’s vote. While John has now been approved by the league’s other owners, it remains possible that the forthcoming legal battle could yet impact the team’s ultimate ownership outlook. Any timeline on a resolution is impossible to predict. If the case is litigated in full and not settled outside of court, it could prove to be a yearslong process.

Share Repost Send via email

San Diego Padres John Seidler Matt Seidler Sheel Seidler

Giants, Lou Trivino Agree To Minor League Deal
Main
Giants Acquire Osleivis Basabe
View Comments (228)
Post a Comment

228 Comments

  1. tom brunanskys black sock

    1 year ago

    Librul hoacks!!!!

    Reply
    • PiazzaParty

      1 year ago

      Fake news sad

      Reply
    • The Raven

      1 year ago

      ?
      In English please!

      2
      Reply
      • SalaryCapMyth

        1 year ago

        That’s as close as people like that get to English.

        29
        Reply
        • CFS77

          1 year ago

          It is up there with Go Brandon!

          Reply
    • User 3871552496

      1 year ago

      So rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic of an ownership group.

      The Seidlers need a good faith/good will signing to convey to fans that have the best interests of the SD Padres fanbase in mind.

      Fans have been given ZERO to work with.

      3
      Reply
    • meckert

      1 year ago

      Did you take your “special vitamins” today little Tommy?

      4
      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      1 year ago

      Shut up

      1
      Reply
      • User 3871552496

        1 year ago

        When the Padres make meaningful acquisitions to address the 12 WAR they lost I will.

        Reply
  2. Consigliore

    1 year ago

    Other owners like John Seidler cause he’s stopped spending. They don’t have to compete with Pods for players. Sell the team!

    5
    Reply
    • Moff_Nick

      1 year ago

      Payroll is increasing this year.

      4
      Reply
      • Consigliore

        1 year ago

        Because of back loaded contacts to injured and underperforming stars. This team is not going to playoffs. 2026 will be worse. Real betrayal of fans and Peter Seidler’s legacy.

        4
        Reply
        • Moff_Nick

          1 year ago

          The payroll mess from back loaded deals is Peter’s legacy for better or worse. Spending like the dodgers or Mets was never going to be sustainable, despite record attendance

          4
          Reply
    • APD

      1 year ago

      I mean that and apparently he’s the only one out of the fight (if the news are correct and widow “only” accused the other brothers).

      In this case I think it’s the best solution, even if it ends up being temporary.

      1
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 year ago

        Sheel has also filled as part of her suit John not be named chairperson.

        MLB seems to have taken a side but that doesn’t mean the courts will.

        2
        Reply
        • socalbball

          1 year ago

          Since Sheel wants the job herself, of course she’s asking that John not get the job. But she has not named him as a defendant in the suit and so is not as yet accusing him personally of actionable misconduct.

          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          That’s because he had never been in charge of the trust.

          1
          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 year ago

          There’s no side for them to take. They have a succession plan submitted by the late Seidler. They approved that succession plan and are going about business as usual by executing it. A mysterious note was never going to cut it. They have a very thorough process when it comes to succession.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          Does your case rest now, councilor?

          Reply
        • believeitornot

          1 year ago

          Counselor

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          That was important. Thanks for your contribution.

          Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      1 year ago

      Look up images of Sheel vs John. Who looks like an actual Padres fan. I would say Sheel. John looks like an investor who went to one game.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        1 year ago

        I see what you’re saying. John has a lot of wrinkles, and Sheel is kind of cute. The cute girl should always run the team.

        Reply
  3. Casey "Cash" Considerations

    1 year ago

    GG padres!! You had a good run

    2
    Reply
  4. LFGSD619

    1 year ago

    Pads Fans/websoulsurfer is gonna blow a gasket.

    8
    Reply
  5. King Floch

    1 year ago

    Explain this to me like I am not a Padres fan (because I’m not):

    Is this good or bad for the Padres?

    4
    Reply
    • Mets Era Thumping Soto

      1 year ago

      Both, they have someone in charge for now but is trying to lower payroll.

      Reply
      • Gwynning

        1 year ago

        That’s not true, metsin4000. Payroll is up $40MM over ’24.

        5
        Reply
        • User 3871552496

          1 year ago

          Windowdressing.

          It’s up because of the escalating contracts.

          One player for 3.5 million was signed this offseason.

          One.

          10
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          1 year ago

          Their payroll was at $255 million when Seidler died. They slashed 86 million last year and have been looking to do the same this year. I dont know why Padre fans keep acting like nothings changed. Would it surprise anyone if 4-5 players are moved by opening day?

          7
          Reply
        • User 3871552496

          1 year ago

          @metsin4 exactly.

          They have not addressed the fans.

          The Seidlers did not attend Fan Fest.

          The Seidlers have not publicly addressed the fans with any sort of budget or overall plans.

          The only issue addressed was Sheel’s contention.

          The lack of transparency is glaring.

          2
          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          Tow- the reasons it up doesn’t matter. It matters that it’s up and likely near the limit. It doesn’t matter if sheel or the brothers win this. There won’t be some huge influx of money added.

          3
          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          Mets- the latest report is payroll will be about where it is at now.

          They aren’t going to trade a bunch of players and just cut payroll.

          They haven’t traded anyone. Their asking prices so far have to been so high. If they wanted to trade people they could have by now.

          2
          Reply
        • die defunctorum

          1 year ago

          And therein lies the problem as we know… salaries going up, revenue not so much because they’ve already been doing a great job marketing the team selling tickets even without much TV revenue to help and the trades, signings worked out very well last year too. Who woulda thunk Higgy, Peralta, Solano and Profar would play so well. King continuing to rise as a starter was not as big of a surprise. However, now there are significant holes in the lineup so unless some of the young guys still left in the franchise step up (Ornelas/Lockridge, Campy and some pitchers) and all the regulars stay healthy all year due to lack of depth in the organization it’s going to be a very challenging season. There aren’t many (any?) free agents that are cheap and good and the trades AJ can make basically make the team weaker now (Cease, King) or trade what’s left of a pretty bare farm system. Padres aren’t “bad” as the team they have can still compete but making the playoffs is currently iffy at best as Mets, Braves and DBacks all look better for wild cards. Winning the WS is extremely unlikely and will only get more challenging as the current contracts get older without improving the farm system asap.

          2
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 year ago

          Tow

          They lost Profar and Higgy and got Diaz. Profar and Higgy both had exceeded expectations.

          Tanner was not there at start of 2024 and Musgrove got injured in 2024. They added Adam.

          So salary is up due to existing contracts, but they need to add one more starting pitcher. But maybe Padres do absolutely nothing in either direction until closer to the trade deadline.

          4
          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          Exceeded expectations is true but that’s still talent that was lost without a reasonable replacement. Campy/Diaz is likely going to be a downgrade over Higgy. There’s no one internally that’s replacing Profar’s production.

          2
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          And the roster is nearly full, towinagain. Due to 40 Man retention, we have known for years that this would be a slow offseason… but please keep crying about stuff you don’t understand, tow! Have some fermunda cheese, it pairs well with your whine.

          4
          Reply
        • LFGSD619

          1 year ago

          They didn’t gain Diaz. He finished 2024 with the Padres.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 year ago

          You are correct, I am comparing to the start of last season.

          So from my perspective, they gained Adam and Diaz, rather than retained them. But we are on the same page.

          4
          Reply
        • CFS77

          1 year ago

          More than the Cards have done

          1
          Reply
        • CFS77

          1 year ago

          I believe that 168M was said as a solid operation goal for the team.

          They are mid market. That amount is fair for their revenue. Having all of the locked up NTC deals is the glaring issue right now

          1
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          1 year ago

          They are probably waiting to see what injuries happen in spring training to get the over pay they want.

          1
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          1 year ago

          No doubt the Padres GM is good.

          3
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          The Padres reset the CBT, Fleet. Even though they’re technically over Line 1 now, they’re back to non-payor status. Penalties exist, but have been reduced dramatically. I don’t think Line 1 is a hindrance in ’25, but we’ll see.

          Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          Sheel inherited $ from Peter and has a right to those funds if Peter left them to her and his/her kids? AND so did PETER’s brothers inherit from Peter (and benefit greatly from the family business most of them didnt help run). So they all gained. Dont understand why you think its only Sheel.

          2
          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          That’s sounds like a lot of money until you realize the trust is worth 5 billion dollars.

          So those are peanuts compared to that amount.

          News at 11, rich person wants to still live a rich life.

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          It’s unanimous first ballot Hall of Shamer Crikes, that’s why.

          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          The brothers have not given her access to what she has the right to receive.

          This trust had dollars specifically set to be given to her. The brothers have been not funding that portion of the trust.

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          You have to be $40MM above CBT Line 1 (a.k.a. Line 3) to push your first pick back 10 spots. I don’t see that happening! QOs become 4ths if you are a payor, which could be the case for King and Cease alike. It is an interesting sidenote to watch in ’25. Cheers bub

          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          If they trade cease like Poole say they should then that only leaves king as a real QO candidate. Perhaps they just extend him making a little over mute.

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          Fair points Simmer, but I’m of the belief that both Cease and King make it to *at least* the TDL. Aloha!

          Reply
        • CFS77

          1 year ago

          Happens all of the time. Things like this normally go into a will then lawyers go to battle.

          In most cases the spouse is #1 in inheritance. Then children. Siblings normally are not a part of the direct line unless there is no direct heirs.

          In this case incompetence has to be proven on the spouse. Add to it the children are not of age. So a trustee would have to be made to control until the children are of age.

          So it is the brothers job to prove incompetentcy of the wife. Or the will has to be written as a trustee will be in charge until the children are of age.

          So it makes this whole situation as not the normal process.

          I believe that she has the right of ownership and the brothers would have to buy ownership to take it.

          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          That’s possible as well. Which complicates the QO. I was just stating against the reasons we need to trade cease.

          I literally have zero idea what preller is going to do.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          Plus the CBT takes effect at end of season so they can go over now but get under later

          1
          Reply
        • User 3871552496

          1 year ago

          @gwynning The ROSTER IS NOT FULL.

          The roster sits at 36.

          The Padres have to replace 12 WAR, and as they are currently constructed, they can’t.

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          Hence why I said almost. Calmate guey. Just like last season, you’re overreacting way too soon.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          1 year ago

          Gwynning
          That’s not true, metsin4000. Payroll is up $40MM over ’24.
          ==================
          But not because of new money. Arraez will cost an extra $13M, Cease $6M, King $4M, etc. Those increases were already baked in well before the off-season.

          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          1 year ago

          I actually think Sheel would run the team more like Peter. John looks like an executive.

          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          1 year ago

          Not a single player, but a group of players like Machado, Tatis, Bogaetys, and Merrill showing improvement over 2024 can easily make up his production.

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          Exactly JB, and part of the reason why the 40 Man stayed at 34, 35 all Offseason. Almost “everybody” is in place… most of them since well before ’24. We’ve known for awhile that this would be a slow offseason, and bake some ownership squabbling into the middle and it added unforeseen uncertainty. Let AJ cook. The 40 will be set, irrespective of some Chicken Littles who claim the sky is falling. Conversely, all is well.

          Reply
        • LFGSD619

          1 year ago

          No, Sheel isn’t terminally ill like Peter.

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          11 months ago

          Just about when are those 4-5 players being shipped out, Metsin4000? Imminent payroll cuts incoming… right?!??

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          11 months ago

          Thanks Joe, if we were to go deeper in comments (and I’m not trying to bring receipts…) those facts are in-line with my previous points with Crikes and towin. We’ve known for *years* that the Pads would have *roughly* a full roster ‘tween 24/25. Obviously and to your points, when you retain 85%+ of a roster then we should fairly assume that *most* of a payroll bump would be attributed to the rostered players. I, for one, never believed we were going to sign a mega-deal this offseason nor really needed to. Pivetta was a nice add for the 4; I think the squad is tight.
          Go Pads

          Reply
    • tatismvpszn

      1 year ago

      Bad news bears. You cannot even find a picture of this dude on the internet. Who tf is he? The Seidler brothers are supposedly dodgers fans who will seemingly sabotage this franchise and we’re supposed to trust this dude?

      3
      Reply
      • Mr Rickey

        1 year ago

        Tin foil hats are available in aisle 3.

        13
        Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          How about educate yourself, smart guy. The Seidler brothers suck and this may end us. Sell the team

          1
          Reply
        • Mr Rickey

          1 year ago

          Your post speaks for itself. Be sure to let us all know when you visit earth again.

          5
          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          Given their vested financial interest I would guarantee that they aren’t Dodgers fans that want to sabotage their largest asset.

          4
          Reply
        • Mr Rickey

          1 year ago

          please don’t confuse him with sensible facts.

          4
          Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          Damn I got cooked

          1
          Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          Sabotage the franchise is what I mean. There were previously relocation discussions with these guys. They have no desire to invest in the team and spend any money. The only photos you can find of them is at dodgers stadium. Just a pissed off fan and have every right to be so stfu

          1
          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          Sheel’s PR campaign obviously fooled idiots. If you think the brothers ever considered moving the Padres you’re simply not a critical thinker.

          1
          Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          “SiMpLy NoT a CrItIcAl ThInKeR”. Um actually it was confirmed that they considered it so you’re simply wrong. 😉

          Reply
        • Mr Rickey

          1 year ago

          you have every right to be pissed off at the current disarray in ownership. but it is ludicrous to suggest they would sabotage the Pads in order to favor the Dodgers. The Seidlers may not know the correct things to do but they damn sure don’t want to hurt their investments., But you go on being rude. It’s very becoming.

          2
          Reply
        • LFGSD619

          1 year ago

          Absolutely ludicrous to even float the idea that the Seidler brothers want to relocate the team.

          1
          Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          I’m not a fan of Sheel Seidler either, maybe not that it even mattered at the end of the day, but she could have sabotaged Rokis decision with the timing of that lawsuit. She was never the savior.

          Reply
        • HHBruin

          1 year ago

          @tatismvpszn, is that you Sheel?

          1
          Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          Lfgsd, I know it’s not happening but they did previously have the thought.

          Reply
        • LFGSD619

          1 year ago

          “Um actually it was confirmed that they considered it…”

          Link or gtfo

          2
          Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          I hadn’t seen that the claim was refuted by one of the brothers. I had heard it was mentioned in the lawsuit. My bad g

          Reply
        • LFGSD619

          1 year ago

          There was never any thought of relocating the Padres. They might be headed for a return of the Padres of 15 years ago tho.

          Reply
        • tatismvpszn

          1 year ago

          Exactly why these scrubs gotta head for the door. Sell the team, fill your pockets up and move on.

          I like the thought of a Steve Ballmer coming in and making Steve Cohen look like a meek peasant. I can only dream

          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          There’s no more viable open market than San Diego. I laughed when I read that she claimed that nonsense & it immediately made me think how much other stuff was BS coming from her.

          Look at the median income and market size of San Diego. If the Pads moved—there would be another franchise angling to get themself to SD ASAP . An absolutely ridiculous claim designed to get support on her side.

          2
          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          1 year ago

          Be pissed off. Please also try to be accurate

          Reply
    • Informed Sportsball Discussion

      1 year ago

      It is a step towards stability with ownership. That is a good thing. Now if the lawsuit makes it to trial, which I really hope it doesn’t, the Seidler brothers can say John has the confidence of the other MLB owners. That should help resolve the matter.

      Whether John intends to and is capable of sustaining success with the Pads remains to be seen.

      1
      Reply
    • James Midway

      1 year ago

      Bad, think of it like Jack Nicholson the biggest Lakers fan in the world being handed a rival franchise. Would fans of said franchise question his commitment to making the team successful, would he want the Lakers to reign supreme?
      Now in context John Siedler is a huge Dodger fan. His grandfather owned the team. Padres failing would make him immensely happy.

      2
      Reply
      • Mr Rickey

        1 year ago

        I believe one of the Padres April game day promotions is brown tin foil hats that say “It’s not a conspiracy. Really it isn’t.” First 40,000 in attendance only.

        1
        Reply
        • User 3871552496

          1 year ago

          @bicouac.

          The Padres lost a total of 12 WAR and have not replaced it.

          One signing of a back up catcher has been completed.

          The Seidler family sans Peter has restricted spending to this point.

          These are facts.

          1
          Reply
        • Mr Rickey

          1 year ago

          no one disputes that. what’s your point? the discussion centered around whether the owners were intentionally sabotaging the franchise. that is nutty. they may be incompetent but not insane,.

          2
          Reply
      • Salzilla

        1 year ago

        This is so not how actual people function it’s unbelievable that folks think this. If you own a team, it doesn’t matter who you were a fan of, that becomes a team. Jeez if I can root for my FANTASY players against the team I root for I’m sure Seidler can root for HIS Padres against the Dodgers. No one is sabotaging THEMSELVES over fandom.

        4
        Reply
        • padrepapi

          1 year ago

          Heck, I think there is a good chance Mr. Padre grew up a Dodger fan since he was from the area. I doubt he was still rooting for them during his 20+ years as a Padre.

          1
          Reply
      • closetball

        1 year ago

        Think Peter Bavasi

        Reply
      • slimray

        1 year ago

        goerge stienbrenner was a cleveland indians fan.bob hope outbid him and he settled for the yankees,that at the time were crumbling and horrible.he restored them to a super power and did not help the indians.win anything if he could help it..so your opinion might be wrong.

        2
        Reply
      • kevnames42

        1 year ago

        I think you’re overestimating fandom. I’m a big Yankees fan, but if I had the opportunity to run the Red Sox, you better bet I’m doing all I can to win

        2
        Reply
    • Moff_Nick

      1 year ago

      Nobody knows right now. Alot of people are siding with the widow because of her PR campaign, but the truth is Peter was the only one who was going to spend whatever it took to win.

      1
      Reply
      • Baltimore_44

        1 year ago

        Her PR campaign—yeah.

        She claimed the brother’s wanted to potentially move the team. I suspect that wasn’t the only pile of crap she claimed.

        6
        Reply
    • JoeBrady

      1 year ago

      I’d say good. There is no evidence that Sheel wants to spend any more or less than the Seidlers. This at least adds a level of stability to the organization.

      1
      Reply
  6. Informed Sportsball Discussion

    1 year ago

    So, we can haz any sort of roster upgrade now? Maybe?

    1
    Reply
  7. Sgt_Pecker

    1 year ago

    Now the rest of the front office will be dragged into the lawsuit. Sell the team and stop all the distraction.

    1
    Reply
  8. James Midway

    1 year ago

    Great I’m sure he will do everything in his power to make sure his grandfather’s team is as successful as possible.

    Reply
    • Gwynning

      1 year ago

      Idk James…
      I’m of the belief that “anybody” who owns a team wants it to do well, and dynamically so. I understand your suspicion, and have nothing to prove otherwise, but I’ll maintain faith in the FO as is. Outside of Preller’s office, I don’t think it really matters who the point person is. We’ll see, I guess. Go Pads

      6
      Reply
      • Chin Muzak

        1 year ago

        Not sure how to respond to someone thinking the owner of a multi-billion corporation would tank it because they like another team.

        3
        Reply
        • Mr Rickey

          1 year ago

          A pat on the head or a hug perhaps.

          3
          Reply
        • James Midway

          1 year ago

          He can have his cake and eat it too. The A’s are profitable but not successful. Just follow that model and you can be happy.

          1
          Reply
    • MrPeanutHead

      1 year ago

      Fred Wilpon was/is a Dodgers fan, but he owned the Mets. While you could argue that he sabotaged the team (Madoff), realistically his fandom was expressed by making the Mets new ballpark into a Dodgers shrine instead of celebrating Mets history.

      1
      Reply
  9. Baltimore_44

    1 year ago

    How will PadsFans try to spin this one? Such nonsense he continued to post like he understood the legal case. Couldn’t have been more wrong.

    3
    Reply
    • LFGSD619

      1 year ago

      My guess is accusing everyone who disagrees with him of being Ryan.

      2
      Reply
      • Chin Muzak

        1 year ago

        ha, I got accused of being Ryan recently too.

        Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          1 year ago

          I’ve never been accused of being Ryan. Kinda sad…

          Reply
    • Baltimore_44

      1 year ago

      I can’t reply to you. But it looks like we’re getting a double down!

      1
      Reply
      • LFGSD619

        1 year ago

        Weird. I have a whopping total of two people muted and they aren’t you.

        1
        Reply
      • Baltimore_44

        1 year ago

        Only gives me the option to flag or mute to your posts. But obviously as we can both see posts that must be a site issue.

        Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          I have the same issue with Padsfan. More weird is something I can reply.

          1
          Reply
    • foppert3

      1 year ago

      He won’t. He will create another account or use one of his existing, for an amended position. The author of those accounts is way too spineless and egotistical for the “I was wrong” words.

      Reply
  10. RotiniRick

    1 year ago

    We don’t have this kind of nonsense in Toronto

    1
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      1 year ago

      Trade proposal- Seidlers for Rogers. Hurry while we have no tariffs!

      1
      Reply
      • RotiniRick

        1 year ago

        Rogers has a no trade. lol. Best of luck out there Gwynning. Ownership drama aside, the product on the field still looks good to me.

        1
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          Concur. Thanks Ricky! Best wishes to your Jays

          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        1 year ago

        SD still has a better organization than TO. Maybe Seidler tanks the payroll, but we don’t know that at this point.

        1
        Reply
  11. Reynaldo's

    1 year ago

    Isn’t he the power hungry megalomaniac in this situation, according to Peter Seidler’s wife?

    1
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      1 year ago

      I’ve always appreciated her fandom and candor, but it would appear she hasn’t exactly been truthful. Perhaps somebody (attorney or friend?) is feeding her bad info?!?!

      2
      Reply
      • Brew88

        1 year ago

        Let it play out in court?

        Reply
      • Brew88

        1 year ago

        Let it play out in court of law?

        2
        Reply
      • foppert3

        1 year ago

        Single middle aged Mum doing what they do. Securing her and her kids future. Sometimes
        the lionesses fight hard and sometimes they do it with claws out. No problem there at all. No one to blame. Just an ordinary situation.

        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          1 year ago

          It feels like everything is set out in the will, though some can come to differing conclusions. I believe that the kids are mentioned in the trust, so they will get their share.

          Reply
    • Simm

      1 year ago

      Sheel has gone after the other brothers Rob and Matt. The only real mention of John was she didn’t want him appointed.

      2
      Reply
  12. oldguyG

    1 year ago

    Kutspenda was a temp . John will be the control person now in 30 days . The lawsuit is just beginning so not much changes .

    Reply
  13. 99socalfrc

    1 year ago

    As a Padres fan the only resolution to this is selling them team. Ownership is a mess. and likely will start to lose the actual baseball ops guys because of it.

    Reply
  14. Jimbo_Jones

    1 year ago

    Sheels attempt at a money grab will be unsuccessful. She’s to blame for this drama, time to move on.

    1
    Reply
    • fightcitymayor

      1 year ago

      Found John Seidler’s burner account.

      5
      Reply
    • Brew88

      1 year ago

      Sheel and her kids already own largest % of team and she’s not trying to buy out the minority owners.

      2
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 year ago

        Brew- reports are she did try to buy out the brothers and they said they aren’t selling to anyone.

        2
        Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          But that’s not what the lawsuit is about, that was my point

          1
          Reply
    • Baltimore_44

      1 year ago

      I seriously doubt both sides will own this team together for the long haul.

      2
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 year ago

        Jbig- it’s hard to see it working out. These situations usually end with the team being sold.

        Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          Yep. I expect that’ll be the case down the line. Can’t imagine they’ll be able to sit in the same room.

          1
          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          1 year ago

          Or one side signing over their voting rights to become silent owners.

          Reply
  15. desertdawg

    1 year ago

    That is the question now will the Padres be spending on big contracts, or depend on mid-level FA’s and trades, Will they rebuild their farm system which sits around the bottom five after being in the five only about 5 years ago.

    1
    Reply
    • Moff_Nick

      1 year ago

      Every few years preller restocks the farm and then uses it to get big league assets. Rinse and repeat

      2
      Reply
    • cwsOverhaul

      1 year ago

      There are no other foreseeable mega contracts anyhow when Machado/Bogaerts/Tatis have those guaranteed deals. They have Musgrove and faith in their pitching development to not pay retail price in other areas.

      1
      Reply
    • Simm

      1 year ago

      They aren’t going to add big free agents. It doesn’t matter which of these two own the team.

      Reply
  16. bigalcathey

    1 year ago

    Sad that when you die people fight over your stuff.

    2
    Reply
    • sdhitman19

      1 year ago

      This is all rich people problems

      Reply
  17. Mikenmn

    1 year ago

    First world problems?

    Reply
  18. BlueSkies_LA

    1 year ago

    Padre fans, Dodgers fans feel your pain. We’ve been through this. The legal process and the outcome is bound to be ugly, and it distracts from the team mission. Hope it can be resolved soon without too much getting broken.

    9
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      1 year ago

      Mahalo Bluey!

      *hat tip*

      3
      Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      1 year ago

      I’m glad this was resolved quickly as now it’s business as usual soon for the Pads. The McCourts trainwreck was something no fan base should ever be subjected to.

      3
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 year ago

        Nothing has been resolved.

        Sheel is still suing the brothers. This will be a mess for quite some time.

        Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          1 year ago

          I get that. But at least neither parties are going to keep moving team assets away quickly just in case the other party wins.

          2
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          Seems MLB put a tourniquet on the problem and stopped the immediate bleeding, but the underlying condition hasn’t been resolved. With any luck the parties will come to some sort of settlement, but it sure doesn’t appear to be headed that way now.

          2
          Reply
    • DroppedThirdStrike

      1 year ago

      I hope this gets fixed so the Padres can become the team they were trying to be. It’s fun to hate the Padres.

      It’s going to a goat rodeo though

      Reply
  19. HEHEHATE

    1 year ago

    Somebody has to be financially responsible of this train wreck if it’s not going to be preller. That’s all I’m saying here.

    Reply
  20. Reynaldo's

    1 year ago

    Why didn’t Peter Seidler leave behind a will if he knew his time was up soon?

    Reply
    • Pads Fans

      1 year ago

      Maybe look into this before commenting

      Reply
    • Brew88

      1 year ago

      He did

      1
      Reply
      • Metropolitans

        1 year ago

        Surprisingly chicken scratch on a piece of notebook paper and a Public Relations campaign wasn’t quite enough to swing this in Sheel’s favor.

        3
        Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          Metro- none of that matters. It’s the courts that will decide.

          4
          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          1 year ago

          He had a 3 tier trust.

          Reply
    • HEHEHATE

      1 year ago

      He did. He left it all to Juan Soto and Prellar traded it away.

      Reply
  21. Wren

    1 year ago

    control person? odd title

    Reply
    • User 3594734386

      1 year ago

      Wait. What. From the time of Peter’s passing to now, there wasn’t a control person?

      Reply
      • Simm

        1 year ago

        There was a temp guy named kutsenda. He was Peter’s former business partner in his equity group.

        2
        Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      1 year ago

      Controlling partner. Someone empowered to make day-to-day business decisions.

      Reply
      • Wren

        1 year ago

        yeah no kidding but that’s not what that title says. I know humor can be tough.

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          Especially when it isn’t funny?

          Reply
  22. Pads Fans

    1 year ago

    Padres didn’t announce it. Its not listed on their website. Do you know why? It was blocked by the courts.

    Reply
    • Pads Fans

      1 year ago

      mlb.com/padres/team/front-office

      Still nothing today. Because the court granted the injunction.

      Reply
      • DigglinDickers

        1 year ago

        Can we get a link where a court granted an injunction?

        Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          We know it isn’t true. This doesn’t become official until the trustee is confirmed next month. That’s why the pads site is not updated. More doubling down on his own BS from PadsFans.

          1
          Reply
  23. HiredGun23

    1 year ago

    “Any timeline on a resolution is impossible to predict. If the case is litigated in full and not settled outside of court, it could prove to be a yearslong process.” You consult an attorney on this, Stevie or is this your take?

    2
    Reply
    • Pads Fans

      1 year ago

      He read the article where an attorney that is not part of the case offered his opinion.

      Reply
      • HiredGun23

        1 year ago

        Thanks, Stevie…

        Reply
  24. Baltimore_44

    1 year ago

    PadsFans continues to be the only reputable source with any knowledge on this matter. Please consult him and him only. He does not need to provide any sources!

    2
    Reply
    • Simm

      1 year ago

      Yeah. Nothing has been blocked. Even sheels attorney has already responded.

      Reply
      • Baltimore_44

        1 year ago

        Major League Baseball is not going to hold this vote if they aren’t confident which way the wind is blowing.

        Anyone disputing that is just doubling down on their misinterpretation of the case. (See the guy above)

        4
        Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          You can say that but the courts will decide.

          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          Ultimately, yes. But we have to use some critical thinking here. MLB is a multi-billion dollar business—think it’d be foolish to think that they aren’t acutely aware of the facts of the court case.

          2
          Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          They were going to hold this vote regardless of how the wind is blowing

          2
          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          There won’t be any convincing you here so to avoid the back and forth we’ll see in a month!

          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          The only side mlb has spoken to are the brothers.

          A lot of people think the trust will be turned over to a court appointed person.

          If she and her kids are the sole beneficiaries then it’s very easy to see she can get the brother tossed off the trust. Since they are required to run it with her best interest. She clearly doesn’t believe that is happening.

          I think team sell wins this but nothing is over yet.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          You don’t need to convince of anything, and you don’t know my opinion on the matter, I was merely correcting you on an important point. But yes, I’m letting it play out in court and that will likely take more than a month so let’s postpone our reunion.

          2
          Reply
  25. Teamspirit

    1 year ago

    This doesn’t smell right. Unless otherwise stated, the wife inherits the husband’s assets. It’s community property.

    Reply
    • Baltimore_44

      1 year ago

      Sheel still owns her shares in the club. She is not and never was the controlling owner.

      Reply
      • Simm

        1 year ago

        If you add up the trust and the brothers together you don’t even get to 50%…combined they own 45%

        1
        Reply
    • JoeBrady

      1 year ago

      Pre-nup

      Reply
      • Pads Fans

        1 year ago

        Not pre-nup. Trust.

        Reply
  26. Teamspirit

    1 year ago

    the owners, make me laugh

    Reply
  27. davengmusic

    1 year ago

    No honor among thieves

    Reply
  28. DigglinDickers

    1 year ago

    I see Pads Fan is in denial after saying this was never going to happen.

    1
    Reply
    • Jobu's Rum

      1 year ago

      Pads Fan also vehemently stated that Ohtani could not effectively defer his salaries to reduce AAV for the Dodgers. He seems to know most of his stuff but it’s not end of the world when you’re proven wrong. You’re going to wind up talking to yourself down the road.

      5
      Reply
      • LFGSD619

        1 year ago

        And that the owners have to pay the players their full, non-prorated salaries for 2020 and that players who ROY finalists are credited with 2 years of service time for their rookie year instead of 1 and that players who are DFA’d in the middle of large long-term contracts can’t refuse an outright assignment without forfeiting their remaining salary and that Mark Melancon and Ha-Seong Kim would exercise their player options with the Padres and that Matt Cain retired early and forfeited the large buyout on his 2018 club option and that Manny Machado said while he was with the Dodgers that he would never sign with a New York team and that Manny Machado wouldn’t have signed with the Padres if they hadn’t signed Eric Hosmer first and the Padres offered CJ Abrams, MacKenzie Gore, Robert Hassell III, Luis Campusano, Reiss Knehr, and Joshua Mears for Ohtani at the 2022 trade deadline and that opt-out clauses benefit teams and that Trevor Bauer’s accuser’s lawyer said they were refiling their lawsuit because Bauer violated the terms of the settlment even though their lawsuit was dismissed ‘with prejudice” which means they legally couldn’t re-file it. Plus he’s always telling stories about seeing players/manager/executives out in the wild, usually while he’s supposedly dining at some fancy schmancy restaurant. And always referring to players/managers/executives by their first names like he’s on some kind of first name basis with them.

        2
        Reply
        • Jobu's Rum

          1 year ago

          Hahaha. That’s a big laundry list. He’d make a entertaining baseball writer for the less-informed.

          2
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          Harambe bringing receipts, haha. LFGSD is right, in more ways than one! Go Pads

          1
          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          Are you saying you read all that? I stopped two words in.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          I just went straight to the last part hoping for a punchline

          4
          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          Was there one, I don’t want to go back but I trust your judgement.

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          Nah, no punchlines. Sadly.

          Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          Not this time

          1
          Reply
  29. DigglinDickers

    1 year ago

    Maybe if Pads Fan didn’t mute me he can provide a link where the court has blocked this.

    Reply
  30. whyhayzee

    1 year ago

    I always find it shocking when a bunch of men vote for another man to be in charge. Um, ok.

    1
    Reply
    • Teamspirit

      1 year ago

      The “MLB Owners” are nothing but a group of elitist men who think they control everything in baseball. They should be held accountable by an independent commission (don’t mention the current Baseball Commissioner, he’s in their pockets.) This whole thing doesn’t smell right.

      Reply
      • Baltimore_44

        1 year ago

        Ughh someone was going to inevitably go there.

        Reply
        • whyhayzee

          1 year ago

          Go where? Common sense? Yeesh.

          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 year ago

          2nd comment. Not yours.

          1
          Reply
        • whyhayzee

          1 year ago

          Ok, sorry. But having someone from the outside might not be a bad idea. I mean, better than a bunch of politicians. That’s happened before and it didn’t accomplish a darn thing.

          Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        1 year ago

        Who would form this mythical independent commission?

        1
        Reply
        • Brew88

          1 year ago

          Easy.

          Gandalf, Legolas, Aragorn, Gimli, Samwise Gamgee, Boromir, Frodo Baggins, Peregrine Took (Pippin), and Meriadoc Brandybuck (Merry).

          3
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          But as always Sauron casts the tie-breaking vote.

          2
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 year ago

          Tom Bombadil shakes his head, as if to announce his displeasure with Brew’s announcement.

          Reply
      • Jobu's Rum

        1 year ago

        Uhm they do control everything when the feds granted MLB an antitrust exemption.

        I don’t agree with Whyhayzee’s blanket statement but they can do as they wish without independent oversight.

        It’s also not a secret that Rob Manfred is literally in the owners’ pockets because they pay him a $25M annual salary to be the commissioner.

        Stop smelling and do some research before posting ignorant comments in the future.

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          Baseball’s antitrust law exception is highly misunderstood. It really applies only to the location and number of franchises, something other pro sports also control quite nicely thank you very much without any exemption from antitrust law. And the “feds” didn’t grant it, the Supreme Court did.

          Anyway, the commissioner is literally MLB’s employee. I can see where you don’t have a clue about who else might employ the MLB commissioner or how this Tolkien character (I like that idea) would be invested with the authority to make any decisions on behalf a business which does not actually employ him.

          But keep calling others ignorant. That’ll work.

          1
          Reply
        • whyhayzee

          1 year ago

          I didn’t say anything about no blanket.

          Actually, I’m not sure which statement you are referring to.

          Reply
        • Jobu's Rum

          1 year ago

          Ah, a one-upper I see with the last word in every thread! And my comment was in direct response to TeamSpirit.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          🙁

          Reply
  31. Butter Biscuits

    1 year ago

    I hope the racist insults towards Sheel from the seidler brothers and family stop it’s unnecessary

    2
    Reply
    • Jobu's Rum

      1 year ago

      Totally unnecessary but when you’re trying to slander the other side and win over public opinion, nothing is off the table for the record. Just because accusations are in court records don’t make them true.

      1
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 year ago

        Those raciest remarks came before anything was made public.

        Reply
        • Jobu's Rum

          1 year ago

          Are you sure you aren’t Pads Fan and enjoy being pedantic?

          Reply
        • Simm

          1 year ago

          Nah, I am team sell. I think they all are a bunch of power and money gold digging scum bags.

          Peter was not this.

          3
          Reply
  32. Metropolitans

    1 year ago

    Sheel Seidler contends in her lawsuit that she is the “natural person” to assume control of the Padres. The suit argues that she is the sole lifetime beneficiary of the Peter Seidler Trust, which holds the largest individual stake in the Padres, and that before his death in November 2023, she and Peter operated as a “partnership” and that she “acted as Peter’s primary advisor in matters related to the Padres.”

    Almost every person interviewed for this story — nearly 20 people, all of whom were in a position to have some knowledge of the Padres’ business and/or baseball operations in recent years and the majority of whom have no current affiliation with the Padres or the Seidler family — either said that Sheel Seidler never had a role in operating the Padres or said they were unaware of any influence or input she might have had.

    Sheel Seidler was also asked to help identify people who could corroborate her claims. Her answer, via email:

    “It is a challenge to respond to false claims when they are being spread by anonymous sources. What I do know is there are many people within the Padres organization — or with close ties — who would strongly refute these claims and offer first-hand examples of my deep involvement in the franchise for more than a decade.

    “Sadly, however, it is my understanding they have been instructed in writing not to assist me in explaining their knowledge of my role in the decision-making related to the team. It is also my understanding they feel they can’t help without losing their jobs, even though — as I understand it — most of the baseball part of the organization remains supportive of me.”

    Padres management denied there was any such written directive, though some employees had previously said they were instructed verbally not to speak about Sheel Seidler and, in some instances, not to engage with her. A Padres spokesperson pointed out the team’s longstanding policy that limits the number of people who are authorized to speak for the organization.

    Many who spoke for this story on the condition of anonymity did so because they said they did not want to become part of the legal wrangling. Others said they were fearful of retribution. Some said they were not authorized to speak by their employer.

    A statement sent to The Union-Tribune on behalf of the Peter Seidler Trust, of which Matt Seidler is the trustee, said:

    “Sheel continues to be part of the Padres family. But it is not correct to say that she had any role in running the franchise. It is unfortunate that she has taken this course of action. The trustees of the Peter Seidler Trust are solely focused on carrying out Peter’s written instructions. That includes setting the Padres up to build on the momentum of the 2024 season in pursuit of a World Series Championship for the city of San Diego.”

    3
    Reply
    • Simm

      1 year ago

      Yeah the only leg Sheel really has to stand on is about her being the sole beneficiary of the trust and her kids.

      Usually means the trustees have to act with her best interest in mind. They could very well be removed from the being trustees. Then that hurts their ability to be the chairperson when mlb is requiring the chairperson also be the trustee.

      At the same time sheel supposedly isn’t allowed to be the trustee either. So now you have a court appointed person.

      Therefore the team may just be sold.

      1
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        1 year ago

        My understanding from reading the response is that the kid’s shares are being held in the trust until they are 40. I saw no reference to shares in the trust belonging to Sheel. I did see the response that Sheel is entitled to an annula stream of income from the trust to afford her to maintain her current lifestyle.

        Reply
  33. SteveFinleyEnthusiast

    1 year ago

    Great…

    Reply
  34. casualfan

    1 year ago

    Super rich people fighting over billions…it is hard to really be sympathetic for either side. The legal teams will be billing in the millions once it’s all done and they’ll probably sell the team anyways. Best to get it ready for sell now and save several million in legal fees.
    I don’t know anything about legal stuff and wills, and I’ll show my ignorance here, but you would think a billionaire would have a will that was so clear and airtight that there wouldn’t be much to argue about?

    Reply
  35. t3f

    1 year ago

    I wonder if the other MLB owners risk some liability for their decision should Sheel prevail in court?

    Reply
  36. sergefunction

    1 year ago

    Those who are permitted to park for free at Petco Park take the widow’s side in things. Not necessarily to run the team, but in the other…“stuff”.

    Brother John hasn’t been accused of…”stuff”…if one takes note.

    BTW, not a conspiracy theorist and don’t see the Friars moving…but one must accept that the forefather of the brothers did all by his lonesome move the Brooklyn Dodgers out of Brooklyn. That “stuff” is undeniably lodged in their DNA.

    So, in this most Doncic of times, all things impossible must not be considered completely impossible.

    Reply
    • Adrian Gonzalez German Marquez

      1 year ago

      It’s not happening. It’s completely laughable.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        1 year ago

        Yup, that’s as close to -0- as possible.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Acquire Caleb Durbin In Six-Player Trade

    Pirates To Sign Marcell Ozuna

    Rays To Sign Nick Martinez

    Mets To Sign MJ Melendez

    Yankees To Re-Sign Paul Goldschmidt

    Tarik Skubal Wins Arbitration Hearing

    Tigers, Framber Valdez Agree To Three-Year Deal

    Padres To Sign Miguel Andujar

    Red Sox To Sign Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    White Sox Sign Austin Hays

    Pirates Join Bidding For Framber Valdez

    Diamondbacks To Sign Carlos Santana

    Reds Sign Eugenio Suarez

    Mariners Acquire Brendan Donovan

    White Sox Acquire Jordan Hicks

    Giants, Luis Arraez Agree To One-Year Deal

    Twins Announce “Mutual” Parting Of Ways With President Of Baseball Ops Derek Falvey

    Athletics Extend Jacob Wilson

    David Robertson Announces Retirement

    Giants Sign Harrison Bader

    Recent

    Rangers Sign Ryan Brasier To Minor League Deal

    Braves To Sign Jonah Heim

    The Opener: Pitchers & Catchers, Arraez, Arbitration Decisions

    Red Sox Acquire Caleb Durbin In Six-Player Trade

    Pirates To Sign Marcell Ozuna

    Phillies Seeking Rotation Depth With Wheeler Doubtful For Opening Day

    Phillies Looking To Move Nick Castellanos This Week

    Dodgers Sign Seby Zavala, Jordan Weems To Minor League Deals

    Pirates Notes: Third Base, Paredes, McCutchen

    Tigers To Sign Konnor Pilkington To Minor League Deal

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version