Headlines

  • Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Heyman: Angels’ Courtship Confuses Crawford

By Dan Mennella | February 23, 2011 at 5:36pm CDT

Red Sox outfielder Carl Crawford remains "puzzled" by the Angels' pursuit of him on the free-agent market this offseason, writes Jon Heyman of SI.com.

Many, including Crawford himself and the Angels, saw the speedy outfielder as a good fit for the Halos as he embarked on free agency at the end of 2010, Heyman notes, but Los Angeles of Anaheim's offer of six years (with an option for a seventh) and $108MM, though hardly paltry, was easily surpassed by Boston's seven years and $142MM.

But what Crawford found especially confusing is that in the wake of losing out on Crawford, the Angels then acquired Vernon Wells, who has a higher per-year salary than Crawford, from the Blue Jays. To boot, the Halos' offer to Crawford, 30 in August, was well below the seven years and $126MM the Nationals had already paid to acquire outfielder Jayson Werth, who will turn 32 in May.

Indeed, it was something of an odd offseason for the Halos, as ESPN.com's Jerry Crasnick wrote a couple weeks back, and their dealings with Crawford seem to embody that the most.

Share 6 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Los Angeles Angels Carl Crawford

Looking At Some Productive Waiver Claims
Main
Phillies Downplay Blanton Trade Rumors
View Comments (234)
Post a Comment

234 Comments

  1. vegasangelsfan

    14 years ago

    It’s true the Angels didn’t seem to handle this, or really anything else, well this offseason. With that being said, I wish Heyman could possibly write one story where he isn’t crawling up Boston’s @ss.

    Reply
    • TheodoreRoosevelt

      14 years ago

      I think he gets an electric shock if he mentions any team other than the Sox, Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees.

      Reply
    • qbass187

      14 years ago

      Heyman is piece of garbage as far as journalism goes. He’s NO Red Sox fan at all, that’s for certain. He’s just lazy. His pieces are weak and contrived with very little substance.
      He never passes up a chance to take a shot or give a backhanded compliment towards Boston.

      Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      14 years ago

      heyman just wrote a “story” literally yesterday the sole purpose of which was to downplay boston’s 2011 club

      he’s not a homer (except for team boras), just a hack

      Reply
    • woadude

      14 years ago

      Heyman is a Yankee homer LOL.

      Reply
      • The_Silver_Stacker

        14 years ago

        Maybe, he does appear on Yankees Hot Stove on Yesnetwork

        Reply
      • vegasangelsfan

        14 years ago

        That seems to be the dissenting consensus. I recall reading many things from Heyman where he seems to be going down on the BoSox, but maybe I am mistaken. I know that this article ends with something like “And that is why the Red Sox are the favorites in the American League.,” but maybe that is not the norm.

        Reply
  2. Cody B.

    14 years ago

    The Halos had a horrible offseason. They could have had Werth or Crawford and AB.

    Reply
    • Marty Inu Kurtz

      14 years ago

      Dont forget Soriano

      Reply
    • PushDown

      14 years ago

      Pass on Werth and AB.

      Reply
    • johnnyfivealive

      14 years ago

      but would have had to commit to years they didn’t want to commit to so no they couldn’t have.

      Reply
      • 0bsessions

        14 years ago

        Except they offered Crawford six years with a vesting seventh year option, so, yes, they could’ve.

        Reply
    • ryankrol

      14 years ago

      Yeah right.

      Like they were really going to take that big of a chunk out of the bulk of such a thin free agent market. lol

      Even the Yankees couldn’t do anything.

      If the Nationals are willing to spend that much money on Jayson Werth, then what does that tell you?

      The Orioles are looking quite interesting.

      The NL Central is actually going to be competitive.

      There’s a reason 8 teams have won the World Series in the last 10 years.

      Reply
      • 0bsessions

        14 years ago

        “Like they were really going to take that big of a chunk out of the bulk of such a thin free agent market. lol

        Even the Yankees couldn’t do anything.”

        Yet the Red Sox managed to upgrade in just about every area of their team and the Phillies managed to compile one of the greatest rotations the game has ever seen. Meanwhile, an already strong Rangers offense has gotten even stronger and the AL Central looks tighter than I can ever remember it being thanks to major improvements to the Tigers.

        Honestly, pitching was thing, but this was honestly one of the stronger free agent classes in recent years for offense and bullpen arms, the Angels’ two biggest weaknesses.

        The Angels dropped the ball, sorry.

        Reply
        • kdub53

          14 years ago

          hate hate hate hate!!

          Reply
          • RedSoxDynasty

            14 years ago

            Dont hate the player, hate the ANGELS!

            Reply
  3. basemonkey

    14 years ago

    In fairness to the Halos, I don’t think you can take the Vernon Wells deal as a pure example of their offseason plan. Yes, they ended up paying out more per year on Wells, but adding him was partly desperation and emergency response to losing out on Crawford.

    Reply
    • O's2011Champs

      14 years ago

      I get what you’re saying, but because they lost out on Crawford they had to take on one of the worst contracts in baseball? The Angels are in a bad area. They have an aging team that’s getting worse, but they’re not rebuilding. If I were the Angels, I would really have started building the farm system for the Mike Trout era.

      Reply
      • PushDown

        14 years ago

        As a matter of fact, the Angels DO have a pretty good farm. I really have no idea where all this “Angels don’t have a good farm” B.S. is coming from, but the Angels are actually ranked 8th. Not only that, their farm is backloaded, as in, most of real talent they have are either in A/AA ball. Conger, and Bourjous have already arrived, and hopefully to stay.

        Also, if people think all the Angels have is Trout, they need to give Jean Segura a look. He has almost the same skillset as Trout, he hits for a good BA (.313), has great speed (50SB in 60 tries) and has some pop( 10 hrs). He doesn’t have as great as upside as Trout, but he should be an excellent player.

        Reply
        • notsureifsrs

          14 years ago

          conger’s nothing to get excited about

          Reply
          • jwredsox

            14 years ago

            I like Conger a lot more than Bourjos. Bourjos is only a defensive replacement.

            Reply
            • notsureifsrs

              14 years ago

              conger looks like a catcher who can’t catch without enough bat for 1B. poor man’s mike napoli

              Reply
              • jwredsox

                14 years ago

                Then I guess it just shows how low I think of Bourjos lol. Conger probably won’t even be given a chance with Scoscia’s man-crush on that catcher they have that I completely forgot his name atm….

                Reply
                • notsureifsrs

                  14 years ago

                  jeff mathis, who posted a .838 OPS in the ridiculous hitters’ park that the Angel’s AAA affiliate calls home (conger posted .847 there in as many games last year)

                  Reply
                • kdub53

                  14 years ago

                  couldnt have said it better myself..
                  napoli was fine at catcher, especially with the 30 homers he would have put up next year…but scoscia loves his mathis….KISSES!!

                  Reply
              • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

                14 years ago

                so Scioscia won’t play him, ever.

                Reply
              • kdub53

                14 years ago

                we should have never gotten rid of napoli…

                Reply
      • johnnyfivealive

        14 years ago

        The Vernon Wells deal was a lot worse a few years ago…it’s not as bad now…just has that stigma attached to it. If Wells goes back to what he did in 09 then yeah…bad deal…but if he does what he did last year in 11, 12, and 13 then it’s a good deal. Expensive, but for a team with a 2 year window…not that bad.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          14 years ago

          There’s no real reason to expect him to be ’10 Wells instead of ’07-’09 going forward though.

          Reply
        • notsureifsrs

          14 years ago

          2010 wells outside of toronto isn’t that good – especially as a left fielder. but even if he could put up 2010-in-toronto numbers, it’s still a humiliatingly bad deal because there was/is a money cost and a talent cost

          it will never be a good deal

          Reply
          • bjsguess

            14 years ago

            Agreed. No matter what Wells does this will be a bad deal simply because the Angels acquired him without getting Toronto to take on more money. In the end getting Wells by itself may prove to be a good move. It’s the money that makes this is a disaster.

            Reply
        • RedSoxDynasty

          14 years ago

          Whhaaat? The Vernon Wells deal is at its worst right now till the end cuz it was soooo backloaded! Look it up! Worst contract in baseball, right up there with ARod!

          Reply
      • basemonkey

        14 years ago

        I wouldn’t worry about the Angels farm right now. It’s true that their system has fallen off the last several years, but part of that is because they set such a high bar for themselves in the early 00s. It’s not a “bad” system by any means. On the whole, i’s probably not where they’d want it to be, but there have been some setbacks.

        I think the Wells contract is certainly a bad one. The Angels will probably regret this move in about 2 years when he’s getting paid 20+M and declining to sub-average levels. I am not saying that he’s going to be that bad, but I am saying that he’s shown enough ups and downs that it’s hard to imagine him improving to such levels where he justifies that contract. TO me, 20M+ means being paid to play at a near-MVP or perrenial 5-tool all-star level.

        Reply
        • basemonkey

          14 years ago

          To put this in perspective, in a couple years, Wells contract might be the single most significant item that hurts the farm system in terms of all the funds not being able to sign and acquire new young talent.

          Reply
    • woadude

      14 years ago

      Emergency? Because they didnt have enough outfielders right? I mean they only had Tori Hunter, Reggie Wilitis, Bobby Abreu, before the trade Juan Rivera…

      Reply
      • 0bsessions

        14 years ago

        Calling Abreu an outfielder is a bit of a stretch. The guy’s practically afraid of walls.

        Reply
        • The_Silver_Stacker

          14 years ago

          The guy IS afraid of walls, there were many times when he was on the Yankees and he would not jump against the wall to make a play and instead the ball would hit the wall and the hitter usually ends up with a double or even a triple at times.

          Reply
          • 0bsessions

            14 years ago

            Oh, I know it. I used to love it, watching that guy flop around, rolling over himself in the outfield anytime the ball came within ten feet of the wall. It was even funnier at Fenway because of that weird shape and big Right Field with the low fences where you could easily rob a homer if you were competent.

            Reply
  4. Cody B.

    14 years ago

    They didn’t lose out on Crawford, they didn’t even try.

    Reply
  5. ryankrol

    14 years ago

    You don’t pay $142 million to a guy who has a .329 lifetime OBP, has never hit 20 homers, and whose #1 selling point is his speed; the first thing to go on any veteran is his legs.

    What exactly is Carl Crawford? A table setter? A run producer?

    At least Vernon Wells has power numbers to back up a lot of what he is being paid, which is actually an average of $18 million a season when you take away the back load on his contract.

    He seems to be caught in this grey area where he’s not patient enough to be a leadoff hitter or to save some AB’s to keep hi BA up (Wade Boggs), and at the same time doesn’t get enough hits to compensate for his lack of patience to maintain a higher BA (Tony Gwynn).

    Batting average is a worthless stat, but in this case it seems like it defines this player more than most.

    At least Vernon Wells has some years with enough power to justify a big contract; he’s actually making an average of $18 million a year, which makes his contract exactly the same as Torii Hunter’s contract with 2 years added, which then turns it into Jayson Werth’s contract.

    Reply
    • dc21892

      14 years ago

      Bitter Angels fan?

      Reply
      • qbass187

        14 years ago

        Obviously.

        Reply
      • ryankrol

        14 years ago

        Nope. Relieved.

        Reply
        • dc21892

          14 years ago

          I have a really hard time believing if you could be GM for a day and pick between Crawford and Wells, you would pick Wells.

          Reply
          • ryankrol

            14 years ago

            Trick question. If I were a GM for a day, I’d pick neither.

            Reply
            • Guest 7233

              14 years ago

              Bingo.

              Reply
            • TheHotCorner 2

              14 years ago

              Agree. I like Crawford but not at that price.

              Reply
            • bjsguess

              14 years ago

              My answer as well. I’m not willing to spend $20m on EITHER player.

              If I was the GM last year (where I voiced my opinions often on this site) Bobby Abreu would never have signed and Matt Holliday would have been a Halo. Less money than Crawford or Wells and would have fit in much better with the Angels needs. Plus you knock off the $20m (or soon to be $30m) that we are paying Bobby A.

              Reply
        • monkeyspanked

          14 years ago

          Me too. Here’s hoping Vernon has a little Andre Dawson left in him. Maybe Crawford’s got a little Vince Coleman in him? He was done at 35. That would still make him good for BOS.

          Reply
        • jwredsox

          14 years ago

          Are you the Angel’s GM perchance?

          Reply
    • start_wearing_purple

      14 years ago

      Vernon Wells is an overpaid/underproducing outfielder who’s only really hit well in Toronto, a hitters park, and now he’s moving to a pitchers park. Angels fans keep trying to defend this move despite the fact if it had been proposed by Jays fans at the beginning of the offseason they would have been laughed.

      Reply
      • ryankrol

        14 years ago

        Wells’ contract looks ridiculous because it was back loaded. He’s actually making an average of $18 million a year, which is Torii Hunter’s salary.

        And that back load can only be handled by a handful of teams, such as the Angels.

        If the money was such a big issue, they would never have taken that deal.

        There’s a perception coming from somewhere that the Angels are financially strapped, or are going to be strapped because of this trade. Not true.

        The reality is this: Arte Moreno is a billionaire who refuses to let his investment spoil his reputation as an entrepreneur.

        Besides, $20 million will be a more common salary in the next few years anyways.

        Reply
        • start_wearing_purple

          14 years ago

          One of us is missing the other’s point. My point is Wells is not this power hitter you want to make him out to be.

          Reply
          • ryankrol

            14 years ago

            Wells is not the power hitter I want to make him out to be? Hmm.

            Vernon Wells’ 162 game averages: 39 2B, 3 3B, 26 HR, 95 RBI, 92 R.

            Carl Crawford’s 162 game averages: 28 2B, 14 3B, 14 HR, 78 RBI, 100 R.

            Crawford is not worth $20 million anymore than Wells is.

            The Angels just basically added another Torii Hunter, with the back loaded end of the same contract Jayson Werth has, and an overall average salary that equals that of Hunter.

            Reply
            • notsureifsrs

              14 years ago

              career ISO away from rogers center: .177

              but hey at least the AL west is full of hitters parks ya know?

              Reply
              • Dick Armada

                14 years ago

                So his career average is only 10 points lower away and his OBP is only down 16 points. Do you know what ISO power shows? It’s not a great thing to have a big number in ISO if your other stats suck.

                Reply
                • notsureifsrs

                  14 years ago

                  why would you question the usefulness of ISO and then only mention avg and obp? his slugging percentage drops 55 points and thus his OPS drops close to 70. .773

                  as a left fielder, that puts him a tick above brett gardner last year. except brett gardner is a great defender. the news only gets worse if you use better stats like wOBA and wRC+

                  Reply
                • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

                  14 years ago

                  unfortunately, his ISO AND his other stats suck.

                  Reply
          • johnnyfivealive

            14 years ago

            He’s better then Juan Rivera though.

            Reply
            • ryankrol

              14 years ago

              Wells averages 39 doubles and 26 homeruns a season. Rivera averages 29 doubles and 22 homeruns. Wells didn’t commit 1 error in 2010, and has 3 Gold Gloves. People are reaching for excuses because the media told them it was a bad deal. Anyone with a decent baseball IQ would know that the money is not even an issue for the Angels, but so many people are still creating that issue, lol. As if they know how a billionaire like Arte Moreno’s checkbook is balanced. lol

              Reply
              • jwredsox

                14 years ago

                Moreno being a billionaire has nothing to do with anything. He still would never run the team in the red. The argument is why they can commit x per year for Wells but not just up that per year offer to y per year for Crawford. And you claim money isn’t an issue with Wells yet you would never pay Crawford 7/142? Kinda a double standard there. And have you seriously resorted to using gold gloves and errors (errors for an OFer of all things)?

                Reply
              • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

                14 years ago

                it would be awfully hard to make an error when the ball falls 10 feet away.

                Reply
        • JP 12

          14 years ago

          I think you’re really reaching here.

          Wells had a great season in 06, and very good seasons in 08 and 10. But he was absolutely dreadful in 07 and 09. Almost without value at the plate.

          I think a realistic best case projection for Wells upcoming seasons would be .260 – .280 AVG, .330 OBP, 25 – 30 hrs. Best case. And he has been extraordinarily inconsistent year to year – so there may very well be a year or two where he absolutely flops as well.

          Even if the Angels have a huge payroll this deal still hurts them, because he makes so much money they are going to have to play him regularly no matter how poorly he plays. You don’t want to commit to having this guy in your lineup the next four years.

          Reply
        • RedSoxDynasty

          14 years ago

          Looks like someone has blind faith in our economy! lol!

          Reply
      • ryanfea

        14 years ago

        Very few educated Angel fans are defending this move. There is literally nothing to defend.

        Reply
        • ryankrol

          14 years ago

          I think the money issue is just an excuse. Salaries are going up, and will continue to go up to the point where players in the mold of Vernon Wells and Torii Hunter will be making $20 million to $25 million a year like it’s nothing. I bet 10-15 years from now players will start breaking the $30 million mark like it’s routine. And if your team can take on a big contract without a problem, then what is exactly is the issue?

          Reply
          • Paul

            14 years ago

            They are making 20-25 million because they were centerfielders, a position neither can play anymore. And I dont think in 10-15 years 30 mil will be routine, there have been less then 30 20mil aav contracts handed out right? hell I might even say less then 20.

            Reply
            • ryankrol

              14 years ago

              They don’t play centerfield because they had enough class to let a young centerfielder by the name of Peter Bourjos step forward. Team work. Imagine that. It had nothing to do with their legs.

              Salaries are only going up!

              Reply
              • Paul

                14 years ago

                The negative UZR says otherwise, but ok continue thinking that.

                Reply
        • johnnyfivealive

          14 years ago

          yes there is – Vernon Wells is better then Juan Rivera.

          Reply
          • ryanfea

            14 years ago

            Better than Juan Rivera & Mike Napoli???

            Reply
            • Dick Armada

              14 years ago

              Yes. These questions are easy.

              Napoli was 34th in HR’s… he had the lowest RBIs of those 34 players. He had the 4th highest K%. Why do you think he bats 7th in the lineup? Wells has better numbers. Rivera is a non factor in the trade. He is entirely leveraging some of the cost of Wells.

              I’m an Angel fan and I rarely see “educated” posts by Angel fans. They are total fanboys that don’t understand how this helps their team.

              Reply
              • bjsguess

                14 years ago

                Come on Adam.

                Guess how many batters ahead of Napoli had fewer PA’s than him? ZERO. Take HR’s out of the equation, if your a comparing one hitter vs 34 other hitters and your one hitter has less PA’s (and in many cases the gap is 200+) guess the probability that your one hitter will post the lowest RBI total.

                Next, look at team offense. Since 80% of RBI’s are traditionally impacted by those around you playing for a good offensive team should help. Conversely, playing for a crappy offensive team will kill you. Guess where the 2010 Angels would fall in that discussion.

                He received less PA’s, played for a terrible offensive team, and as you pointed out, batted in a non-traditional run producing spot in the lineup. Guess I’m not shocked that his RBI totals were subpar.

                Napoli + Rivera had every chance to replicate what Wells can provide the team. Unfortunately, the team’s leadership decided that Napoli couldn’t catch. That killed his value and made him worthless to the club.

                Reply
              • ryankrol

                14 years ago

                People forget, or don’t even know, that the Angels only added about $12 million to their current payroll. lol

                Reply
                • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

                  14 years ago

                  for an overall downgrade.

                  Reply
            • ryankrol

              14 years ago

              WAY better!

              Reply
      • johnnyfivealive

        14 years ago

        I would rather have Vernon Wells then Juan Rivera. That’s all I’m saying.

        Reply
        • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

          14 years ago

          i’d rather pay 5 million for a bad LF than 20 million for an average LF

          Reply
    • Chip1010

      14 years ago

      Not that I’m necessarily in favor of the signing, but defense matters, and Carl Crawford is one of the best outfielders alive. The total package of Carl Crawford is a very valuable one.

      And speedy, high-contact hitters tend to age better than sluggers anyway.

      (Accidentally hit “Liked” instead of “Reply.”)

      Reply
      • dc21892

        14 years ago

        I was wondering what the “like” was about, lol.

        Reply
      • Commander_Nate

        14 years ago

        Wells will probably be a better defender in LF that Juan Rivera was, Hunter will be better in RF than Abreu was, and Peter Bourjos will be better than either Hunter or Wells in CF. Crawford is obviously a better defender than Wells, but the Angels are hardly going to have defensive problems in the OF this year.

        Reply
      • Kevin Kidd

        14 years ago

        He’s one of the best outfielders alive? Don’t you think that’s a bit of an exaggeration? Are you honing in one specific aspect of being an outfielder?

        Reply
        • Chip1010

          14 years ago

          Yeah, run prevention. Looking at UZR, he’s been by far the best defensive left fielder in baseball for years, and his numbers seem to indicate he’d be damn good in center, too (though he’s said he’d rather not play there). You can take UZR with a grain of salt, but other metrics seem to back it up. And it’s not worth much, but even my non-scout eyeballs tell me he’s incredible out there.

          Reply
          • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

            14 years ago

            to be fair, his arm sucks.

            Reply
      • ryankrol

        14 years ago

        That total package is worth no more than $12 million a year.

        Reply
        • Chip1010

          14 years ago

          WAR says the total package was worth more than $25 million in each of the last two years. Not that he would get that in free agency, obviously, but you’re grossly underestimating Crawford by cherry-picking the one or two things that Wells does better and ignoring everything else that a baseball player can do to help his team win.

          Reply
    • Anthony

      14 years ago

      While I think the Sox overpaid for Crawford, Crawford was the best FA position player on the market.

      His OBP for his career is .337, not .329. But his OBP 3 of the last 4 years never dipped below .355. The other year he was dealing with injuries, his first without at least 143 games played.

      His offensive skillset has plenty of value outside of AVG. And throw in his elite defensive skills and you’ve got a damn good ball player.

      “You don’t pay $142 million to a guy who has a .329 lifetime OBP, has never hit 20 homers, and whose #1 selling point is his speed; the first thing to go on any veteran is his legs.”

      No, what you don’t do is take on one of the worst contracts in baseball entirely and give up a valuable piece in the process. Sorry, but it makes a lot more sense for the Red Sox to give $142 million to Crawford than it does for the Angels to take on Wells contract.

      Reply
      • johnnyfivealive

        14 years ago

        If you are afraid of guaranteed years then doesn’t. The Angels are afraid of years so it made sense for them to take on Wells contract.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          14 years ago

          Apparently what they are really afraid of is quality years. At least with Crawford they would have got the “good” years of the contract to offset the bad ones, instead of just picking up the more expensive years of a contract that was bad to begin with.

          Reply
          • ryankrol

            14 years ago

            Just what the Angels need right? Another overaggressive hitter.

            Reply
            • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

              14 years ago

              funny how you call Crawford an overaggresive hitter. One of Wells’ nickname was Vernon “first-pitch-swing” Wells

              Reply
    • OrangeCards

      14 years ago

      You know how to tell if a contract is bad?

      You’ve got to compare it to Jayson Werth’s …

      Reply
    • jb226 2

      14 years ago

      “which is actually an average of $18 million a season when you take away the back load on his contract.”

      If Vernon Wells had stayed with Toronto for the life of the contract, that would actually be a fairly good point. But of course he didn’t. What you have instead is the Angels who got the expensive half of the contract, which Wells can’t even come lose to living up to even if he repeated his 2010 numbers for the next four years, who would be a LOLfest if he repeated his 2009 numbers for the next four years, and who, realistically, is going to be worth only about half of what he cost when all is said and done.

      Your comment did make me look up Wells’ contract and see something I did not know, however: Wells got a $25.5MM signing bonus, paid out $8.5MM at a time for 2008-2010 (the Blue Jays’ portion of the contract). The Blue Jays actually got at terrible ROI on their half of the contact as well (56.5% I believe) almost exclusively because of that. Made me realize exactly how terrible this contract really was. I thought they had gotten some benefit by managing to dump the contract before it got expensive and with the terrible backloading of the salary, but it was mediocre for them too.

      In any event, I’m not $142MM high on Crawford either. I do think he has a better chance of living up to a higher percentage of his contract than Wells does, however. Even if we’re talking (percentage-wise) Crawford’s entire contract against Wells’ next four years.

      Reply
      • ryankrol

        14 years ago

        The Angels can afford it though. People are creating the issue of money while Arte Moreno is swimming in a pool of cash.

        The Angels added another Torii Hunter, that’s all that should matter. If they want the money to be an issue, they will bring it up to the LA Times.

        No matter the case though, if I were GM for a day, I’d pick neither.

        Reply
    • Guest 7231

      14 years ago

      Crawford is a 5 tool player. He can do everything. Hit 19 Hr’s .307 BA and stole 47 bases last year. Add gold glove defense and Crawford is one of the best OF in the game in his prime. The huge contract means nothing to sox fans because they have the money to spend. I’m sorry bud, but the Angels signing Vernon Wells stinks of desperation. They needed an outfielder, missed out on 2 premier free agents (Werth, Crawford) and went with a suckier more expensive option in Wells. I don’t think most sensible halo fans will agrue this offseason was a bust and the ownership of that franchise has issues.

      Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        14 years ago

        one of the five tools in a strong throwing arm. so no. but he’s a very good 3 and a half tool guy

        Reply
  6. Guest 7237

    14 years ago

    Why exactly is Crawford still talking about it?

    Reply
    • dc21892

      14 years ago

      I was wondering the same thing above. Earlier he was talking about the Yankees, too. Weird.

      Reply
    • qbass187

      14 years ago

      Why do you think? The baseball media is making the rounds to all the different clubs and the question is being asked. What do you expect them to ask him? His favorite color?

      Reply
  7. $7562574

    14 years ago

    the angels have a policy not to sign anyone with character issues.

    Reply
  8. Thurman8er

    14 years ago

    The Angels’ off season has made me truly worry for the first time in years. I’m used to them not coughing up ridiculous amounts of money for long-term deals, but the over-reaction in trading for Wells made things much worse. With Texas and Oakland on the rise, the best move would have been to play hard the next couple of years and hope for the best until Conger, Trumbo, and Trout are ready to fill in the holes.

    Reply
    • Anthony

      14 years ago

      They just shipped Trout and Weaver to New York for Carlos Beltran.

      Reply
      • $7562574

        14 years ago

        n.y. sent $1 billion along with beltran.

        Reply
        • notsureifsrs

          14 years ago

          in IOUs

          Reply
    • ryankrol

      14 years ago

      Over-reaction in trading for Wells? What makes you think they were ever serious about Crawford or Beltre in the first place? They just got a player with higher 162 game averages than both of those players. The money isn’t even an issue.

      Reply
  9. BlueSkyLA

    14 years ago

    The BoSox offered Crawford $20m a year and the Angels offered him $18m a year. I’m puzzled by how Crawford can be puzzled.

    Reply
    • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

      14 years ago

      and then the Angels basically gave 20m a year to Wells. I’m puzzled by how you are puzzled by how Crawford can be puzzled.

      Reply
      • Dick Armada

        14 years ago

        They bought up Wells’ contract because they then desperately needed a bat. I’m puzzled puzzledldeuppuppuepppzppupuz etc.

        Reply
        • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

          14 years ago

          (pssttt. Wells’ bat isn’t that good.)

          Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        14 years ago

        I’m puzzled by where you found any reference in my post to Wells.

        Reply
      • ryankrol

        14 years ago

        Look at their 162 game averages, and then ask that question.

        Reply
        • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

          14 years ago

          Look at their home/away splits. Then shut up.

          Reply
  10. BrianC

    14 years ago

    Jon Heyman and Carl Crawford appear to be the only ones not over this story. All Angels fans have moved on. Did Crawford really want to be an Angel? He must have it this is still a story.

    Reply
  11. PushDown

    14 years ago

    I’m not even going to try to defend the Wells trade here, but I have to say, I’m sorta glad we passed on 7 years of Crawford. Before you call me bitter and whatnot, hear me out.

    Crawford’s game is centered around speed. 2 out the 3 reasons the Angels badly needed him is his defense and baserunning. Now Crawford is 30, and everybody knows speed is the first thing a veteran loses. So 2 out of 3 of Crawford’s main assets should should be pretty deteriorated in 3 or 4 years. As for his bat, I truly believe his bat was overrated, even during the weeks the Angels were pursuing him. He doesn’t have the power to be a middle lineup force, or the patience that a real leadoff hitter needs to have.

    I may be wrong, Crawford may retain that speed when he gets older, like Juan Pierre or Bobby Abreu did, though Pierre was a true lead-off while Abreu had MUCH more than speed. Call me bitter, but I could easily imagine Crawford with much of his speed diminished in 3 or 4 years left on his contract.

    Reply
    • jwredsox

      14 years ago

      Speed is not the first thing a guy who is as athletic as Crawford loses. You’d be right if he were a bigger guy but Crawford’s speed will probably age like a Kenny Loftan or a Henderson.

      Reply
      • ryankrol

        14 years ago

        Do not even put Carl Crawford in the same sentence as Rickey Henderson. lol

        Reply
        • jwredsox

          14 years ago

          If they played in the same era Crawford would probably have just as many steals. But my overall point is in body types and athleticism. Crawford is a guy who keeps himself in terrific shape and guys like that don’t just lose their speed. I could see Crawford having the ability to steal 20+ in his 40’s if he got playing time

          Reply
        • Chris Masteller

          14 years ago

          You just did. :/

          Reply
    • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

      14 years ago

      Bill James did a study and concluded that speedy players age better than others

      Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        14 years ago

        nevermind all of that i have an opinion that must be voiced

        Reply
        • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

          14 years ago

          who care about your opinion?

          Reply
          • notsureifsrs

            14 years ago

            I WATCH THE GAMES NERDISTICIAN. CALCULATE THAT

            Reply
            • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

              14 years ago

              Joe Morgan is that you?

              Reply
              • notsureifsrs

                14 years ago

                i believe you mean joe morton

                – tim mccarver

                Reply
                • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

                  14 years ago

                  well played sir. I cannot top that.

                  Reply
    • Dick Armada

      14 years ago

      I thought power was the first thing to go.

      Reply
      • PushDown

        14 years ago

        Really? I always thought it was logical for a player’s legs to go first, resulting in a decrease in speed. I’m may or may not be wrong about the speed part but i’m pretty sure power is not the first to leave. Look at how many old sluggers that are still in the league just because they can bomb it LOL!

        And logically, wouldn’t it be easier to maintain your strength by working out regularly.

        Reply
        • ryankrol

          14 years ago

          That’s why the DH works for the AL.

          Reply
  12. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    oh disqus

    Reply
  13. LA Angels

    14 years ago

    Too bad Crawford didn’t go to the angels… That wouldve been cool… But my guess is that red sox will go all the way… And I hate Yankees so if the red sox kill the Yankees then I would be happy  lol

    Reply
  14. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    personally I think Crawford is a bit wasted in Boston. He doesn’t fit well into that lineup unless he hits leadoff, which he apparently does not like. I wouldn’t like Crawford batting 6th or 7th.

    Reply
    • jwredsox

      14 years ago

      I think the plan is to hit Pedroia first with Crawford 2nd. At least that’s the way I would do it.

      Reply
  15. Jays All The Way

    14 years ago

    Sorry to promote my league on these comments, but I need 9 more people for a dynasty keeper league with ESPN standard rosters and scoring. I am looking for dedicated owners who would like to be part of this league.

    Please Email me at MattG808@gmail.com if you would like to join

    Thank You

    Reply
  16. Hoosierdaddy92

    14 years ago

    The Angels probably don’t want to have a lot of LONG-TERM commitments to free-agents. They probably preferred 4 years at 20MM a season for Vernon. However, there is no reason why they should have let Adrian Beltre go to a division rival when they clearly had a need for production out of third base.

    Reply
  17. Brandon

    14 years ago

    By the end of next year Crawford will be 31 already… sad…
    Youkilis shaved his beard off!

    Reply
    • WhenMattStairsIsKing

      14 years ago

      I saw that on MLBN last night. It looked very weird.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Recent

    Giants Place Matt Chapman On 10-Day Injured List

    Mariners’ Bryce Miller Out Four To Six Weeks With Elbow Inflammation

    Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is “North Of Zero”

    Diamondbacks Place Justin Martínez On IL With UCL Sprain

    Orioles Select Luis Vázquez

    Rangers To Sign Craig Kimbrel To Minor League Deal

    Akil Baddoo Accepts Outright Assignment With Tigers

    Dodgers Recall Matt Sauer, DFA José Ureña

    Chris Stratton Elects Free Agency

    Aaron Nola To Be Shut Down For Two Weeks With Stress Reaction In Rib Cage

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version