Dodgers owner Frank McCourt received a $1.2 billion offer for the Dodgers and related assets yesterday, though Major League Baseball appears skeptical. Here's the latest on the 66-70 Dodgers…
- Everybody is assuming that smoke and mirrors are involved in the $1.2 billion offer, according to ESPN.com's Buster Olney.
- The issues that plague the Dodgers and Mets mirror the cities the teams play in, Jeff Passan writes at Yahoo Sports. Everything about the Dodgers is excessive, while the Mets' situation is cold and cadaverous, Passan says.
- Bill Plaschke of the LA Times argues that Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw deserve the MVP and Cy Young Award, respectively.
- If Kershaw is a Cy Young candidate, then Cliff Lee has to be one as well, Eric Seidman argues at FanGraphs. The two-left-handers have remarkably similar numbers this season.
Kershaw CY Young, maybe… but how “valuable” can Kemp be on a last place team?
Wow. Jeff Passan is very skilled. He is the only writer that I know of that can infuriate everyone in LA (excessive) and New York (cold and cadaverous) at the same time. Has anyone else noticed that everything he writes is negative to the extreme?
Passan is a TJ Simmers wannbe.
You obviously haven’t been a Simers reader for that long.
Passan runs circles around Simers, as would my 9 year-old son if he wrote a baseball article.
Or he is the love child of Jim Rome and Simers. Given neither is a “power top” one wonders how they decided…both seem to favor the low blow however.
“I can already hear the Philadelphia Phillies fans crying thatRoy Halladay has done nearly as well as Kershaw under much greater pressure, contributing to a much better record, but history turns their argument lame. Some of those same folks were surely cheering in 1972 when Steve Carlton won a Cy Young Award while pitching for a Phillies team that won 59 games.”
Great argument Plaschke. That really highlights the merits of Kershaw over Halladay.
There is an argument for Halladay, Lee and Hamels.
I love how he doesn’t mention that Clayton Kershaw’s top 2 era is only .02 percent lower than Roy Halladay’s and that Halladay lost a win to a rain delay, otherwise they’d be tied.
Just look at their post ASG numbers and Kershaw is better. If people want to talk about pressure and performance what better gauge than 2nd half trends?
Halladay’s 5-2 with a 2.53 ERA in 8 starts in 53.1 IP and 53 Strike Outs and 8 Walks
Kershaw’s 8-1 in 9 starts 1.32 ERA, 68 Innings, 15 walks, and 65 strikeouts
Other than ERA and Wins he hasn’t been that much better. Kershaw has a signifigantly lower opponent’s batting average against but Halladay gives up a lot of fluky base hits because of his Cutter.
Halladay’s numbers tailed off last year too (for his standards). It has mostly to do with the workload Charlie puts on him Early in the season.
I don’t see what their 2nd half trends would show though? The Dodgers are out of contention and the Phillies have been leading the division comfortably for a while. If they have a big lead, they’re not sending Halladay out there to finish a game like they would early in the year… and once they clinch he’s basically going to be on a pitch count.
I assume you are being sarcastic. Carlton won 27 games for an awful team that won 59 games total. A little different than Kershaw.
Kershaw and Kemp deserve some kind of award for showing up every day and at least trying to be professional.
He’s quoting the guy who wrote the article. Either way it’s a ridiculous comparison.
“Kershaw and Kemp deserve some kind of award for showing up every day and at least trying to be professional.”
Do you honestly think that this merits an award?! ALL baseball players should be doing this with the amount they are being paid to play a game!
Kemp deserves it. He’s been the best player in the National League this year. Winning team or not.
Obviously I’m biased, but I feel like Halladay should have the Cy Young over Kershaw. Kershaw pitches in the worst offensive division, or close to it (I don’t know the #’s off the top of my head) in one of the most pitcher friendly ball parks in baseball. His home/road splits:
Home: 10-1, ERA: 1.80, .914 WHIP
Away: 7-4, ERA: 3.17, 1.132 WHIP
Roy Halladay’s home/road splits:
Home: 8-2, ERA: 2.32, WHIP: .975
Away: 8-3, ERA: 2.64, WHIP: 1.109
Lets keep in mind, that according to most people on this site, Citizens Bank Park is a joke of a stadium. If CBP is that much of a joke, why is Roy Halladay dominating there? If you take into account that Roy Halladay pitches most of his games at Citizens Bank Park, you could make the case that he’s having the better year. If CBP is a way of diminishing Ryan Howard’s accomplishments or any other player, it should do the opposite for Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, and Cole Hamels.
I think the only thing that would keep Halladay from winning the Cy Young is Cliff Lee or Cole Hamels taking votes away from him.
My Cy Young top 5 would probably be:
1. Roy Halladay
2. Clayton Kershaw
3. Cliff Lee
4. Ian Kennedy
5. one of Tim Linceccum or Cole Hamels.
I love how people use CBP as some kind of excuse. The park doesn’t bother Halladay, Lee, Hamels or even Jamie Moyer when he pitched there. How many people know that Ryan Howard actually has more HRs on the road. It’s a joke how fans get caught up in sabermetrics.
I know. I can’t stand it. People just can’t accept Ryan Howard as one of the best sluggers in baseball for some reason.
My point is that if it’s a way of dismissing Howard than it should make what Halladay and Lee do look even better.
Uhh, because he’s not. There is plenty of data freely available to back this up by the way; you should check it out.
uhh, he is. There’s plenty of data freely available that backs that up…
But then again, Home Runs and RBI’s are irrelevant. They don’t win games or anything.
OK clearly it’s useless arguing with you. Have fun with your RBIZZ, grission and clutch hits.
Good because I don’t want to. It ends up being a war between sabermetricians and the people who don’t believe in them and its a pointless debate. Either you use them or you don’t (and most people don’t). That’s what it comes down to with Ryan Howard…
This isn’t even his topic anyway. I just used him as an example because people on this site routinely say Citizens Bank Park is a band box and used that in my argument for Halladay for Cy Young; if it helps Ryan Howard’s numbers that much like everyone claims, it would hurt Halladay’s that much. That’s it. I don’t want to debate Ryan Howard as a hitter.
Some dude on Bill Simmons’ Grantland published an article about the harsh decline of the Phillies offense, and cited Ryan Howard. I proceeded to check his stats, saw 30/100, and chuckled.
he may not be worth 25 million annually down the road, but he’s still a top 5 first baseman in baseball.
I think it has more to do with Utley and Rollins declining. This is a guy (Utley) who used to hit .300 with 30 bombs and 100 RBI’s and used to be in the category that Robinson Cano is now. Now, he’s lucky to hit .280. Jimmy, as Ruben said recently, is basically useless to the Phillies without his legs, which he really hasn’t had in years.
But yeah, he’s not worth $25 million. It’s not the stretch some people make though. He was already making $20 million and there’s no way he’d take a pay cut from that. There’s also no guarantee that the Phillies could sign Pujols or Fielder. They did a good job locking up Howard. The way people talk about him though, they act like he’s the only over paid player in baseball. I mean, he has a really good agent (same as Jeter… who’s also very much overpaid). They’re paying him for what he’s done (the MVP and the NLCS MVP) the historic September runs that lead them to the post season in 2007 and 2008… and they’re paying him to make a run Mike Schmidt’s home run record.
I can name at least 10 better first basemen.
Then do it.
My top 10:
1. Pujols
2. Agon
3. Cabrera
4. Votto
5. Texiera
6. Howard
7. Fielder
8. Konerko
9. Helton
10. Freddie Freeman
for this season?
Subtract Howard and Konerko(dh) and insert Kotchman, Hosmer, and Morse and going forward I would take all of these first baseman next season as well. I would take Carlos Santana if he was a full time first baseman too.
I really wanna know the logic with Howard before Prince.
There is none.
Ryan Howard hits more home runs, drives in more runs, and has carried a team into the playoffs. Prince Fielder wouldn’t have made the playoffs in 2008 if it wasn’t for CC Sabathia, the Mets would have won the Wild Card. Prince is a softer body than Howard and is more likely to break down. The only thing Prince does better than Howard is get on base… Ryan Howard has 6 straight 30/100 seasons. How many does Prince Have? Ryan Howard’s low batting average is a product of an over shift.
I’d love to know the logic in picking a a first baseman who’s never hit 15 home runs in a season, a rookie, and a journey man who’s had a good season and a half… over a former league MVP.
because they are better than Ryan Howard?
hahah whatever.
Saying Fielder wouldn’t have made the playoffs without CC is ludicrous, it’s like saying Howard wouldn’t have made it without Hamels or Halladay.
He would have and has. Cole Hamels missed the stretch run in 2007 and Halladay’s only been here for two years.
Well considering that CC Sabathia put the Brewers on his back in the stretch run in 2008. Prince had a factor but he wasn’t the one leading the charge. Cole Hamels never had a run like CC’s.
kershaw has put up very similar numbers to halladay and lee this season, but it is his league leading 212 k’s that separate him from the other 2. kemp in my mind would win the mvp right now, but not if the dodgers are an under .500 team. (no bias, coming from a rockies fan)
So the Cy Young award should go to the guy who strikes out the most batters? The guy who pitches in one of the most pitcher friendly ball parks in baseball?
I’m no expert, but if you put Clayton Kershaw in Citizens Bank Park instead of Dodger’s Stadium… his numbers most likely wouldn’t be as great as they are now. Put him against the Nationals and Marlins instead of the Giants and the Padres. They’d probably still be good, but would he have a 2.45 era? a 1.02 whip?
Strikeouts are pretty, but they’re not the only way to dominate.
Halladay has 191K in one less start and has a 8.7 SO/9 compared to Kershaw’s 9.6 SO/9. Not exactly a huge difference. If the numbers are that close it should go to Halladay.
“The guy who pitches in one of the most pitcher friendly ball parks in baseball? ”
Because Dodger Stadium helps him strike out batters? I mean, I know phillies fans aren’t very smart, but come on.
No. It helps his ERA and WHIP. I didn’t say anything about his strikeouts. I said is the reason that he should win the Cy Young because he strikes out more guys (barley) than Halladay or Lee? I then asked: should he win because he has the advantage of pitching in a bigger ball park? Considering the difference (still good) of his ERA and his WHIP on the road. Two questions.
I’m not really sure you read what I wrote.
Dodgers Stadium is neutral. 15/30 stadium every year.
Have you seen what Kershaw did to those teams when he pitched against them? Yeah, simmer down.
This year? 3-1 in 5 starts. His last 17 innings (against New York and Florida) were scoreless.
He didn’t face Philly or Washington.
Arizona and Colorado have better offenses than Was and Phi.. so not sure why that matters anyways
and how has he done against them compared to what he’s done against San Diego and San Fransisco?
Away from Dodgers stadium.
My division argument wasn’t even that big of a deal. I just said his ERA would be higher if he didn’t pad it by pitching against the Giants and Padres consistently. My main argument was the home/road splits. Explain that one. Just because he beat those teams in 3/5 starts doesn’t mean he would dominate them if he faced them as much as he does the Padres or the Giants.
I think the ones that deserve these awards are the ones that get the most votes.
kershaw deserves they cy young, but braun is the mvp.
Halladay deserves the Cy and Braun deserves the MVP!
John W- Are you related to Tom Verducci over at SI? He shares the same flawed perception of what the MVP award entails.
Don’t discredit a player’s performance because he’s doing it on a sub par club.
If I were to swap Kemp with Fielder or Kemp with Braun, do you think the Brewers would still be in 1st place? Of course. Do you think the Dodgers would still be counting down the days of September? Absolutely.
Simply suggesting that Kemp has not been valuable because his team sucks is ridiculous. If anything, it’s even MORE impressive that Kemp has put up those numbers despite batting in front of James “perennial non-tender candidate” Loney or –gulp– Juan Uribe.
Not to mention he plays in Dodger stadium 82 times a year. Recalling from memory, Miller Park averages .6 HR and easily a full run more per game.
He also plays a large chunk of games against the NL West, which sports an average ERA of 3.71 (excluding the Dodgers 3.64 of course), while Braun and Fielder play 65+ games against the NL Central, which sports an era of 4.15, a disparity of nearly half a run per game. (Of course, one could argue that this disparity can be chalked up to the Brewers potent offense, which simply strengthens my case that Fielder/Braun have more around them)
The list goes on and on…1.92 HR/game at NL Central ballparks vs. 1.62 HR/game at NL West ballparks, etc, etc.
Contention is such a silly criteria for MLB MVP voting, one that is entirely decided by the collective- brass, coaches, all 25 players. This isn’t the NBA where one player can carry an otherwise mediocre team into a top 4 playoff seed.
Would Braun and Fielder be any LESS valuable had Doug Melvin not pulled the trigger on the Greinke and Marcum trades, two pieces that have arguably pushed the Brewers to the next level? Of course not.
Kemp is the NL MVP, plain and simple.
Plaschke is kidding himself if he thinks Kemp will win the MVP. Kemp has good enough numbers to win it,but not over Fielder,who will probably win it,or even Braun.It’s not Kemp’s fault,it’s just not the year for him to have an MVP-type season.
Kershaw is a different story.He does have a legit chance at the CYA,and if Halladay wasn’t in the conversation,I’d say he’d be a lock to win it.Forget Hamels(dead arm issues= 20 less innings pitched) and Lee(mediocre April,May and July) and Lincecum(too many losses).This is a 2 horse race between Halladay and Kershaw.But Halladay has had only 4 bad outings(given up more than 3 earned runs).Kershaw has had 7 bad outings.Plus,Halladay is already the reigning CYA winner.And I think that,in order for Kershaw to win the award,he has to be significantly better than Halladay.And,so far,he hasn’t.In short,Halladay wins the Cy,Fielder wins the MVP,and Plaschke gets to predict the next “carmageddon”.