Headlines

  • 2021 Trade Deadline Will Be July 30
  • Diamondbacks Sign Josh Reddick To Minor League Deal
  • Jonathan Hernandez Undergoes Tommy John Surgery
  • Dexter Fowler To Undergo Season-Ending Knee Surgery
  • Tommy John Surgery Recommended For James Paxton
  • MLB Inspecting “Suspicious Baseballs” From Trevor Bauer’s Latest Start
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Awarded Claim On Josh Beckett

By Ben Nicholson-Smith | August 24, 2012 at 3:48pm CDT

3:48pm: The Dodgers claimed Beckett, McAdam reports (on Twitter). This will create many possibilities for a larger trade involving Adrian Gonzalez.

3:35pm: An unidentified team has claimed right-hander Josh Beckett off of waivers, Sean McAdam of CSNNE.com reports (all Twitter links). One MLB executive believes the mystery team could be the Dodgers, but that hasn't been confirmed. Beckett can veto any trade or waiver assignment as a player with ten and five rights.

The Red Sox now have until Sunday to select one of three options. They can let Beckett (and his contract) go to the claiming team, they can complete a trade with the claiming team, or they can pull him back off of waivers. American League teams had claiming priority on Beckett.

McAdam suggests the Red Sox would probably allow the claiming team to take on Beckett and his salary — $15.75MM per season through 2014. He has posted a 5.23 ERA with 6.6 K/9 and 2.7 BB/9 in 127 1/3 innings this year, while facing considerable scrutiny for his on-field performance and off-field actions. The Rangers showed some interest in Beckett leading up to the July 31st trade deadline.

Gonzalez was claimed by the Dodgers today, but reportedly won't be traded unless the Red Sox obtain a substantial return.

Share 13 Retweet 130 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Josh Beckett Los Angeles Dodgers

Minor Moves: Cubs, Koyie Hill
Main
Joe Saunders Clears Waivers
88 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. Bruce Miller

    9 years ago

    let him GO

    Like
    Reply
  2. ugotrpk3113

    9 years ago

    THERE IS A GOD!!!

    If they don’t let him go outright, I’m heading to Yawkey with a pitchfork.

    Like
    Reply
    • Me

      9 years ago

      Isn’t it funny how Yawkee and Yankee are one letter off.

      Like
      Reply
      • Derek Carson

        9 years ago

        Except that it’s spelled Yawkey

        Like
        Reply
        • Me

          9 years ago

          Ugotrpk had it spelled Yawkee before he edited it.

          Like
          Reply
  3. jmcbosox

    9 years ago

    can beckett exercise his 10-5 rights? i mean, technically its not a trade if they just let him go, right? oh please God…..

    Like
    Reply
    • Guest

      9 years ago

      Yeah, he can.

      Like
      Reply
    • carpengui

      9 years ago

      [dble post removed]

      Like
      Reply
      • elclashcombo

        9 years ago

        I agree. It seems pretty evident he wants out of Boston and barring the teams you mentioned above, he’d probably accept any destination especially Los Angeles.

        Like
        Reply
    • carpengui

      9 years ago

      (If this is a double post, sorry – something weird is going on).
      Ennyhow, yes: Ten-and-Five rights do apply regardless… but bet the farm: he’ll accept virtually any new destination….other than maybe Houston or KC (ain’t gonna be).

      Like
      Reply
      • Crucisnh

        9 years ago

        I agree, it would seem likely that Beckett would accept going to LA. At this point, why not? They’re a pretty good team with new, wealthy owners who seem to have deep pockets and a willingness to spend. And it’s in the NL West with large, pitcher-friendly parks. What’s not to like if you’re Beckett?

        Like
        Reply
    • Rayland#1

      9 years ago

      10 and 5 rights apply only to trades.

      Like
      Reply
      • Karkat

        9 years ago

        “10 and 5 rights apply only to trades.”
        ^ This is incorrect.

        Like
        Reply
        • IdontknowwhyIpostonforums

          9 years ago

          EDIT: I found my answer.

          Like
          Reply
          • Karkat

            9 years ago

            There was a lengthy discussion about this when Cliff Lee was the big story and multiple people posted corroborating pieces of evidence. 10-5 rights, as well as other “no-trade” protections cover any sort of transaction, not just trades, despite the terminology.

            Like
            Reply
          • withpower

            9 years ago

            Read the original posting provided by MLB TradeRumors more carefully.

            Like
            Reply
            • IdontknowwhyIpostonforums

              9 years ago

              That is exactly what I did. I have always read/heard “trade” and not “transaction” paired with the 10-5.

              Like
              Reply
      • carpengui

        9 years ago

        No. Even if they ‘let him go’ (and Boston might very well do so), it’s still a transaction and 10 and 5 applies.

        Like
        Reply
    • johnsilver

      9 years ago

      We could buck, gag him and then stick him in a closet over the next 48 hours…

      Like
      Reply
  4. Ben_Cherington

    9 years ago

    Hopefully I dont Eff this up!

    Like
    Reply
    • Karkat

      9 years ago

      We all hope that

      Like
      Reply
  5. anthony

    9 years ago

    Why does the report always come in as “X player was claimed on waivers” and not “X team claimed X player?” Why does it take longer to find out the claiming team?

    Like
    Reply
    • Crucisnh

      9 years ago

      Because a number of teams may put in a claim, and then MLB has to determine which team has precedence to be awarded the claim.

      Like
      Reply
  6. philpbarnes

    9 years ago

    Wow…. feels like christmas!

    Like
    Reply
    • Crucisnh

      9 years ago

      Only if it goes through! ;)

      Like
      Reply
  7. elclashcombo

    9 years ago

    Woo hoo!! Let him go!!!

    Like
    Reply
  8. Jay Essman

    9 years ago

    What happens if he pitches in the next two days and gets hurt. Does the claiming team still have to take him?

    Like
    Reply
    • carpengui

      9 years ago

      If there’s any chance of him leaving, you won’t see him in a BoSox uni (ever) again. In general, DL’d players can be traded with league approval, but neither side would want such a risk, so it won’t come up.

      Like
      Reply
  9. Redsoxn8tion

    9 years ago

    I agree, let him go. He already said that he doesn’t want to play for a team that wants to trade him, so I assume he’ll waive his NTC.

    Like
    Reply
  10. mu_Zak

    9 years ago

    It is the new Yankees – that SoCal dream team – buying everything that glitters- even when the gold gilt has worn off… Bowden saying Beckett WILL go to whatever team claims him.

    Like
    Reply
  11. WickedKevin

    9 years ago

    Hope the Rangers claimed him since Beckett is more likely to want to go there. It’s not like Dempster has looked good.

    Like
    Reply
    • carpengui

      9 years ago

      That’s my bet: Texas

      Like
      Reply
      • carpengui

        9 years ago

        …and I’m wrong. Wow.

        Like
        Reply
  12. chicothekid

    9 years ago

    Nobody, and I mean NOBODY is D*MB enough to let this one pass. When someone takes Vernon Wells off your hands, do you stop and think, “could have I gotten more?” or do you pull the trigger before they change their mind? When the Mets offer Kazmir for Zambrano, you don’t stop to think about it, and…
    when someone offers to take Beckett off your hands and you don’t have to pay ANY of his remaining contract, you DON’T THINK TWICE about it. Pull the trigger already.

    Like
    Reply
  13. Guest

    9 years ago

    If they take him off of waivers he is FREE TO GO, at least I hope so. I’m not sure he was put on trade waivers.

    Like
    Reply
  14. SierraM363

    9 years ago

    Please jebus. Please let this be true. I’ll drive him to the ariport.

    Like
    Reply
    • HerbertAnchovy

      9 years ago

      Don’t forget to bring chicken and beer for the ride.

      Like
      Reply
      • LayerCake

        9 years ago

        I can’t wait for that punchline to die

        Like
        Reply
        • HerbertAnchovy

          9 years ago

          It never will, so you’d better get used to it or perhaps bury your head in the sand somewhere. That story was gold.

          Like
          Reply
  15. carpengui

    9 years ago

    Jim Bowden tweet (this is nutty): “I think the only way the LAD would claim Beckett is if it were part of a deal for A-Gon and they forced them to claim Beckett as part of deal?”

    Like
    Reply
    • carpengui

      9 years ago

      okay… give Bowden credit on this one!

      Like
      Reply
      • Sky14

        9 years ago

        Never give credit to Bowden!

        Like
        Reply
    • johnsilver

      9 years ago

      LOL. THAT is funny.. somebody else was out of it enough to claim Beckett? boston just makes the LAD take Lackey instead and the Sox manage to get rid of every LT commitment..

      I knew there was a reason nobody pays any attention to Bowden and he was a dolt as a GM…

      2nd thought? Maybe he should take over the commissioners job.. he could be an improvement from Selig at least….

      Like
      Reply
  16. johnsilver

    9 years ago

    HaHa. Now HERE is someone the LAD can gladly have.. No deposit and NO return..

    Edit:

    I have to add this:

    What is going through the LAD brass minds claiming him and his salary? Granted, he should improve drastically in both the NL and at Chavez Ravine, but over the off season, Boston would have moved him and probably paid a portion of his salary to a taker and now? With a claim? LA is OTH for the entire sha-bang? A colossal mistake.

    Could it be this is a part #2 scenario in a deal for Gonzalez we don’t know about, where Beckett was to be claimed by the LAD?.. Who knows.

    As the stomach turns in LA…

    Like
    Reply
    • lakersdodgersyankees4life

      9 years ago

      Cause I guarrantee that cheerington asked Ned to claim him in regards to agone. IMO, no way these aren’t linked

      Like
      Reply
      • APNDaveR

        9 years ago

        Except the waiving team doesn’t learn whose claim is awarded until the waiver period expires. Therefore the Dodgers would have had to claim both players prior to knowing they were awarded each of the claims. Sorry to bust your conspiracy theory….

        Like
        Reply
        • lakersdodgersyankees4life

          9 years ago

          Of course they don’t know the winning team. But if you notice, agon was put on waivers an claimed before Beckett was announced. Easily could have been something at the deadline where Ben made it clear Beckett and Gonzalez would have to be together in a deal to La. Like I said, it couldn’t have been a formal agreement, but a handshake agreement of “claim him and if it works out we’ll talk” is very possible

          Like
          Reply
          • APNDaveR

            9 years ago

            I’m not sure you’re clear on how the waiver system works. Once you place a player on trade waivers, a 47-hour period begins in which other teams can put in a claim on the player. At the end of the 47 hours, the lowest-ranked team who placed a claim is awarded the claim, and the team has 48 hours to revoke waivers, send the player to the claimant outright, or negotiate a deal.

            So if Beckett and Gonzales are being awarded today, it means they BOTH were placed on waivers TWO DAYS AGO. There can’t possibly be any “we’ll now put Beckett on waivers and you’ll have to claim him” handshake agreement after the Gonzales claim. And Beckett is a 10-5 guy, which means he can’t be moved without his consent. Your theory just doesn’t make any rational sense.

            Like
            Reply
            • lakersdodgersyankees4life

              9 years ago

              I think either I’m saying what I’m am trying to say poorly or you are misunderstanding what Im saying. I’m looking back at the deadline. Ben and Ned discussed Gonzalez. It didn’t work out. I’m saying that it is possible Ben told Ned that If he’d be willing to put a claim on bth they can continue to discuss and it is possible the handshake agreement I was talking about was if Ben said if you claim both I will not just dump Beckett. Is is far fetched? Probably, but does it happen a lot. I’m sure. It’s a business

              Like
              Reply
      • Sky14

        9 years ago

        The Sox have no obligation to send AGon with Beckett. They can just pull Agon back and “reward” the Dodgers with Beckett.

        Like
        Reply
    • Karkat

      9 years ago

      I wondered this. Were they afraid that the Nationals were going to claim him or something? Doesn’t seem too likely that he’d get all the way to LA and then get claimed in the handful of teams above them, all of which have much less payroll flexibility.

      Like
      Reply
      • johnsilver

        9 years ago

        Could be, but man that is dangerous.. Padres pulled that stunt in ’98 with Randy Myers and got stuck with him and his remaining 17m left on the contract for a finished pitcher trying to block Myers from going to Atlanta.. myers gave them **nothing**. Taking on a risky player and though we think Beckett will return to some kind of form in the NL, it’s no given and 35m is a huge risk if it’s just a blocking maneuver.

        Like
        Reply
        • Karkat

          9 years ago

          I mean, I don’t think it was just a blocking maneuver. LA has interest in getting Beckett, I’m sure. But now it’s not necessarily going to happen on their terms, which is the big problem. I have a strong feeling that the Sox may very well just part with him if he approves and they can’t work out some kind of deal, and so the Dodgers put themselves in a much weaker position by doing that. Unless he pitches like it’s 2007, it’s just not worth the risk when only, what, three-four teams had a chance to claim him after the Dodgers?

          Like
          Reply
          • APNDaveR

            9 years ago

            If it was a block, it had to be to block the Nats. Nothing else makes any sense.

            Like
            Reply
          • johnsilver

            9 years ago

            I am with you on giving him to the LAD, regardless. Forget even being serious with regards to a deal.. Boston sheds 16m AAV in moving Beckett.. THAT is salary relief of a serious note. 10m with Matsuzaka, Youks is now gone. They will be losing nearly 50m counting all the smaller ones..Jenks, etc…

            Like
            Reply
    • IdontknowwhyIpostonforums

      9 years ago

      It really is only two more years of that contract. Hardly back-breaking for a team flush with cash as the Dodgers seem to be. I mean, we still have Uribe on the roster so…

      My prime concern is what are they going to do with all this pitching next year? I know one can never have too much but this rotation does not exactly wow especially considering the money invested next year.

      Beckett: 15.7mil
      Lilly: 12mil

      Kershaw: 11mil
      Billingsly: 11mil
      Harang: 7mil

      Capuano: 6mil

      That is a lot of money for a rotation that has one true #1 and what amounts to a bunch of 3,4,5s. Plus Beckett is signed one more year, Kershaw NEEDS to be signed long term. This doesn’t even touch the needs on offense.

      So I guess I argued myself into agreeing with you about the claim.

      Like
      Reply
      • APNDaveR

        9 years ago

        Maybe trade Billingsley for offense? You’re not going to get much in return for Capuano or Harang at this point in their careers.

        Like
        Reply
        • IdontknowwhyIpostonforums

          9 years ago

          But who would really want to give up a piece the Dodgers need for Bills. He is good (at times, great) but not enough to warrant any real significant return on a bat. Even pairing him with some prospects would be needed. I really could see a deal with Cleveland involving Choo. That would really be a boon for both teams.

          Like
          Reply
      • thegrayrace

        9 years ago

        I wouldn’t put much faith in Lilly at this point.

        Like
        Reply
    • Armando Chairez

      9 years ago

      Beckett would be a welcome upgrade in Dodgertown… Every pitcher has his downs. Nowhere to go but up. Dodger Stadium is pitcher friendly, he will do good in L.A.

      Like
      Reply
  17. chicothekid

    9 years ago

    IF they let Beckett go for nothing, THEN included Crawford in a deal for AGON, THAT would really shake up the payroll and roster for next season. The Sox would have a ton of new money to spend and be rid of two of their biggest problems.

    Like
    Reply
    • Ben_Cherington

      9 years ago

      On what free agents?? Who takes over first? There arent any good pitchers available.

      Like
      Reply
  18. jhawk90

    9 years ago

    “awarded” lol – kinda like the time that Taco Bell chalupa awarded me 45 minutes on the can

    Like
    Reply
  19. Karkat

    9 years ago

    If a claim on josh Beckett was the “award” I’m afraid to consider the nature of the contest.

    Like
    Reply
  20. John LeClair

    9 years ago

    Red Sox should be jerks and pull back Adrian and send Josh to LA for NOTHING!

    Like
    Reply
    • Steve Carr

      9 years ago

      They could, but I would hope Colletti put in a call to Cherington to say, “we’ll make the claim on Beckett to give us more latitude for a Gonzo deal, but I’ll only do it if you guarantee not to screw me.” Guessing. Hoping … obvioulsy, I’m a Dodger fan.

      Like
      Reply
  21. carpengui

    9 years ago

    Dodgers??!!

    Like
    Reply
  22. diesel2410

    9 years ago

    What aren’t the Dodgers doing??? Other than win with all their spending

    Like
    Reply
  23. dc21892

    9 years ago

    Let him walk! Even if he was having a good year id say the same thing his attitude is terrible.

    Like
    Reply
  24. Brian

    9 years ago

    Dodgers are playing pokemon this season. Gotta catch ’em all.

    Like
    Reply
  25. withpower

    9 years ago

    Would Beckett waive his no trade for nothing?

    Like
    Reply
    • APNDaveR

      9 years ago

      There’s a good chance he would. Los Angeles is a good place to play, he’s got a great shot at getting some decent playoff money with the Dodgers, he’d be out from under a press corps and fan base that has grown to hate him with a passion, and he still gets paid.

      Like
      Reply
      • withpower

        9 years ago

        That assumes Josh Beckett cares about what anyone else thinks.

        Like
        Reply
        • APNDaveR

          9 years ago

          I would never assume that Josh Beckett cares about anything, sir!

          Like
          Reply
    • Karkat

      9 years ago

      Depends on if he wants to go to LA/get out of Boston. it’s not like it affects his salary, just where he’ll be playing for the next couple of seasons.

      Like
      Reply
  26. Steven Lourie

    9 years ago

    I’m a Red Sox fan and it’s sad that I haven’t been this excited all season.

    Like
    Reply
  27. APNDaveR

    9 years ago

    The Dodgers also made a waiver claim on Johnny Pesky.

    Like
    Reply
  28. jack

    9 years ago

    only reason the claimed him was to see if we could take on both gonzalez’s and becketts contracts for low level prospects

    Like
    Reply
    • Chuy Gutierrez

      9 years ago

      You Dont say??

      Like
      Reply
  29. Sky14

    9 years ago

    In one year the Dodgers went from tightwads to blindly throwing money around. It still doesn’t seem right to me.

    Like
    Reply
  30. Jose Villasano

    9 years ago

    yea this look wack for dodgers but i really think this is really good because Josh Beckett could possibly be an ace again he just need a new home

    Like
    Reply
  31. RahZid

    9 years ago

    How does this claim create more possibilities for an AGon trade? If anything it reduces options, since it gives the Sox leverage as they can simply assign him to LAD and be rid of the bad contract (assuming JB waives his 10-5 rights).

    There would have been more possibilities if he had cleared waivers

    Like
    Reply
  32. TweetYouz

    9 years ago

    So can Beckett block the claim with his 10-5 rights if the Sox decide to just let the Dodgers or is it only if it is an actual trade? I assume it is the former not the latter.

    Like
    Reply
  33. mu_Zak

    9 years ago

    Beckett + Crawford + Punto + AGon = a 250mil disaster in the making!

    Like
    Reply
  34. Jim McGrath

    9 years ago

    Will the league allow a trade without at least a PTBNL or multiple players to be named if both AGon and Beckett are included. I’m wondering if the Sox would get any major players or prospects in lieu of the debt relief?
    If Aviles has cleared waivers perhaps they would make it a trio and get Hanley in return?

    Like
    Reply
  35. BlueSkyLA

    9 years ago

    Next headline: Los Angeles Dodgers claim Boston Red Sox off waivers.

    Like
    Reply
  36. BoSoxCurseBreaker

    9 years ago

    When Frank McCourt left Dodger-town did he play a sweet practical joke? Did he switch the “yes” and “no” buttons on the waiver-wire remote control? Pretty epic practical joke, man!

    Like
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    2021 Trade Deadline Will Be July 30

    Diamondbacks Sign Josh Reddick To Minor League Deal

    Jonathan Hernandez Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Dexter Fowler To Undergo Season-Ending Knee Surgery

    Tommy John Surgery Recommended For James Paxton

    MLB Inspecting “Suspicious Baseballs” From Trevor Bauer’s Latest Start

    Trevor Rosenthal Undergoes Thoracic Outlet Surgery

    Blue Jays Sign GM Ross Atkins To Five-Year Extension

    Yankees Acquire Rougned Odor

    Brewers Trade Orlando Arcia To Braves

    Recent

    D-backs Activate Zac Gallen

    Marlins Rumors: Yermin, Greene, Dickerson

    2021 Trade Deadline Will Be July 30

    Several Former Big Leaguers Sign With Mexican League’s Guadalajara Mariachis

    Diamondbacks Sign Josh Reddick To Minor League Deal

    NL Injury Notes: D-backs, Carrasco, Lamet

    AL Injury Notes: Anderson, Rays, Cabrera, Schmidt

    Cubs Place 3 Relievers On COVID IL, Select Pedro Strop

    Angels Place Anthony Rendon On 10-Day IL

    Jonathan Hernandez Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Kris Bryant Rumors
    • Francisco Lindor Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version