Headlines

  • Cubs To Sign Carlos Santana
  • Red Sox To Extend Aroldis Chapman
  • Red Sox Release Walker Buehler
  • Pirates Place Isiah Kiner-Falefa On Outright Waivers
  • Randy Rodriguez Recommended To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Padres Place Xander Bogaerts On IL With Foot Fracture
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Red Sox Renew Mookie Betts For $950K

By Jeff Todd | March 2, 2017 at 10:21am CDT

The Red Sox have renewed outfielder Mookie Betts’ contract at a healthy $950K price, according to Alex Speier of the Boston Globe (via Twitter). Betts, 24, has established himself as one of the game’s best players and is fresh off of an outstanding 2016 season in which he slashed .318/.363/.534 with 31 home runs and 26 stolen bases.

On the heels of that effort, Betts will take home the second-highest amount ever given to a 2+ service-class player who wasn’t eligible for arbitration, falling shy only of Mike Trout’s 2014 payday of $1MM. Nevertheless, the Red Sox weren’t able to get him to sign his name to the agreement. The club had the right to renew him at whatever amount it preferred, so long as it met or exceeded the league minimum salary, so it’s not as if he had much leverage. But it’s still somewhat notable that Betts was the organization’s only player to make the symbolic gesture of forcing the club to renew him.

That being said, president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski says that he did not sense any bad feelings between the sides during negotiations, as Tim Britton of the Providence Journal reports (Twitter links). Certainly, the club could have taken a harsher stance in setting the final number, but obviously had no interest in making a point at the expense of its relationship with a key player. As things turned out, says Betts, there’s no animosity on his part. (Via Michael Silverman of the Boston Herald, on Twitter.)

It would not be surprising to see the sides back at the bargaining table sooner rather than later. If nothing else, there’ll be a hefty arbitration salary to negotiate next winter, but it’s also possible to imagine that the sides will explore a longer-term deal. While Boston enjoys three years of control over Betts beyond the upcoming season, the team’s leverage will wane as he gets closer to free agency and increases his earnings through the arb process.

Share 0 Retweet 5 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Transactions Mookie Betts

Nationals Designate Spencer Kieboom, Announce Joe Blanton Signing
Main
MLB, MLBPA Announce Rule Modifications For 2017 Regular Season
View Comments (34)
Post a Comment

34 Comments

  1. dodgersneedrings

    9 years ago

    Couldn’t even give the guy a million?

    Reply
    • Connorsoxfan

      9 years ago

      I’m not sure they want to demonstrate he’s just as valuable as Trout. Which he is creeping up to if he repeats last year, but with a 400 million dollar contract being talked about for Harper, however unlikely, 3 more years of Betts putting out these stats and he’s looking at the same thing.

      Reply
    • acm14

      9 years ago

      Service class comps are taken rather seriously and he didn’t match trouts production

      1
      Reply
    • pullhitter445

      9 years ago

      At least they will be saving money with him. David price deal will haunt them for years.

      1
      Reply
    • JaysFan19

      9 years ago

      Melvin Upton Jr. Is making 17 times more this season…. let that sink in

      1
      Reply
      • go_jays_go

        9 years ago

        MUJ’s deal was signed as a free agent; Mookie Betts was handed his contract as a pre-arb player.

        It’s not a clean comparison.

        1
        Reply
        • Cam

          9 years ago

          I think he’s aware of this – but wanted to point out how incredible it is nonetheless.

          Reply
        • afenton530

          9 years ago

          Bobby Bonilla is still picking up checks from the Mets, bad contracts are everywhere

          Reply
  2. Bald Vinny

    9 years ago

    If he wouldn’t sign that contract…. they should’ve pulled a page from the Levine school of employee relations and renewed him at the minimum. What could go wrong?

    2
    Reply
  3. TribeTown

    9 years ago

    Really unsure of the wording “established himself as one of the game’s best players”. Too small of a sample size. Let’s see him perform for the next few years at this rate first

    1
    Reply
    • trace

      9 years ago

      Define “sample size” for established players.

      Reply
    • cards2WS 2

      9 years ago

      Dude, he’s had 1500 ABs and has an OPS of .855. He has 17 WAR in 2.5 seasons including nearly 10 WAR last year alone. Please tell me how he’s NOT one of the best players in baseball? Not to mention he was always a top prospect, so it’s not like this came out of nowhere

      1
      Reply
      • hakunamoncada

        9 years ago

        He was definitely not considered a top prospect. He only made the BA list once and that was at #75.

        baseballamerica.com/statistics/players/cards/23

        1
        Reply
        • go_jays_go

          9 years ago

          “He only made the BA list once and that was at #75 (after the 2013 season)”

          Betts had 211 PA in 2014, which caused him to lose his rookie status.

          Had the Red Sox organization decided to keep Betts in the minors for all of 2014 and allow Betts to retain his rookie status, he would’ve easily been a consensus top 10 prospect for 2015.

          The only reason why Betts was never given the ‘top prospect’ label is because he flew by the upper minors too quickly.

          Reply
        • hakunamoncada

          9 years ago

          He wasn’t “always a top prospect” though as the original poster had stated. There is no way to argue otherwise.

          Reply
      • TribeTown

        9 years ago

        I’m not questioning objective production. I’m questioning whether that label should be applied relative to all other players. Would you put him in the same class as Trout, Cabrera, Donaldson, Kershaw, Posey, etc.? I don’t think the label fits relative to other players is all. Feel free to disagree

        1
        Reply
        • Priggs89

          9 years ago

          First, I would put Trout and Kershaw in a separate class all to their own.

          Then yes, I would happily put Mookie in the next class (Bryant as well).

          Reply
  4. JDSchneck

    9 years ago

    Trout will get at least 400 Mill if he wants it. If Bostons smart, Betts on the other hand could have the potential to get a contract next year for at least 250 Mill

    Reply
    • Mo Vaughn

      9 years ago

      Actually Betts can’t because he’s not a free agent until 2021, so…

      2
      Reply
      • CubsFanForLife

        9 years ago

        I think he means an extension

        Reply
  5. pinballwizard1969

    9 years ago

    Interesting that even with a significant raise over what the Red Sox had to pay him Betts still refused to sign on the dotted line. Could mean any talk of an “hometown discount” extension at some point can be dismissed.

    Reply
    • Connorsoxfan

      9 years ago

      I’m not sure that’s ever in the question when you have the potential to make a couple hundred million. Sure, if it’s 63 mil instead of 70 mil, maybe you consider it if you love where you are, but 200 mil to 250 mil? He’s gone.

      Reply
      • tuna411

        9 years ago

        I would think it the other way around…um, maybe. Both numbers are astronomical wealth but if 200 vs 250 makes you leave a place you are suppose to be happy, priorities are out of whack.

        And if betts wants to make a point and NOT sign the SECOND HIGHEST ever contract for amount of experience, I’d re-up him at league min + a couple of hundred thousand. Just stupid on his part to not sign…

        Reply
        • Priggs89

          9 years ago

          You must be a Red Sox fan.

          1
          Reply
        • nysoxsam

          9 years ago

          No incentive to sign/not sign. No big deal either way. Sox have more to lose today. Best to do what they did and try to negotiate to buy out arb years. Only reason to offer less is next year will be measured in part on 2017 production, in part on past awards to similar situated players and in part on his most recent salary. My guess is he’ll force the issue year to year with Boras as his agent and then see what the open market has in store at that time. Betting on himself which Trout chose to first cash in with a guarantee and Harper as of now seems like a loser. That said, Harper still has plenty of time to reinstate his market place beliefs. Even if he were a free agent now, it would be hard to consider him a “loser” even if $400M isn’t offered.

          Reply
        • pinballwizard1969

          9 years ago

          Boras is NOT Betts agent, The Legacy Agency is.

          1
          Reply
    • lesterdnightfly

      9 years ago

      If he doesn’t take that “hometown discount” ?
      Then all Betts are off….

      1
      Reply
  6. go_jays_go

    9 years ago

    I thought most clubs had a direct formula for calculating salaries for pre-arb players.

    So to avoid situations like this one, the club can simply say, the salary is dictated by club policy.

    Seems odd.

    Reply
  7. mikeyank55

    9 years ago

    Betts announced late this afternoon, “I’m done with this team. “DD” pisses away $200 million on Price and can’t give me a raise? How about if I start playing defense like another prima Donna, Manny? Should I jake it in the outfield and give the fans something to laugh over? And they couldn’t throw some money at the only proven winner on the team to keep Papi playing? Please. Who is gonna protect me?”

    Reply
  8. 22222pete

    9 years ago

    Yankees took their raise off the table last year when Betances did not sign and renewed at the minimum. Betts would have lost 400 K if the Red Sox did the same

    Reply
  9. 22222pete

    9 years ago

    What would happen if Betts decided not to play unless he got paid whatever he felt he was worth. Who blinks first?. Betts obviously has no leverage as he has nowhere to go, but the Red Sox are in win now mode with 200 million in salary committed and half a dozen top prospects in trades

    Reply
  10. RiverCatsFilms

    9 years ago

    People compare him to Trout and doesn’t even get a million smh

    Reply
  11. halosfan4ever27

    9 years ago

    Betts cant even get a million? but they’re willing to spend 217 million on price?

    Reply
  12. metsmosloyal23

    8 years ago

    What a talent smh…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Cubs To Sign Carlos Santana

    Red Sox To Extend Aroldis Chapman

    Red Sox Release Walker Buehler

    Pirates Place Isiah Kiner-Falefa On Outright Waivers

    Randy Rodriguez Recommended To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Padres Place Xander Bogaerts On IL With Foot Fracture

    Cardinals To Promote Jimmy Crooks

    Red Sox To Promote Payton Tolle

    Corey Seager To Undergo Appendectomy, Not Ruled Out For Season

    Frankie Montas To Undergo UCL Surgery

    Guardians Release Carlos Santana

    Brewers Place Trevor Megill On IL Due To Flexor Strain, Sign Erick Fedde

    Guardians Place Carlos Santana On Outright Waivers

    Astros Reinstate Yordan Alvarez From Injured List

    Nathan Eovaldi Likely Out For Season Due To Rotator Cuff Strain

    Mets To Promote Jonah Tong

    BBWAA To Institute Relief Pitcher Of The Year Award In 2026

    Zack Wheeler Recommended For Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Surgery

    Frankie Montas Done For 2025 Due To “Pretty Significant” UCL Injury

    Orioles Extend Samuel Basallo

    Recent

    Cubs To Sign Carlos Santana

    Nick Anderson Elects Free Agency, Reaches Deal With Mariners

    Red Sox To Extend Aroldis Chapman

    Dodgers Notes: Stewart, Kopech, Hurt

    Pavin Smith Unlikely To Return In 2025 Due To Quad Strain

    Astros Sign Matt Bowman To Minor League Deal

    Vinny Nittoli Opts Out Of Orioles Deal

    Orioles Outright Cody Poteet

    Orioles Release Matt Bowman

    Pirates Promote Cam Devanney, Place Ronny Simon On 10-Day IL

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version