Headlines

  • Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Reds Place Zack Cozart On 10-Day DL

By charliewilmoth | July 29, 2017 at 12:17pm CDT

The Reds have announced that they’ve placed shortstop Zack Cozart on the 10-day DL, recalling righty Kevin Shackleford from Triple-A Louisville to take his place. Cozart has been out since Tuesday after aggravating a quad injury, as Zach Buchanan of the Cincinnati Enquirer reported yesterday.

“I’m just going to obviously have to deal with the rest of the year,” Cozart said. “I’d like to get whatever happened on Tuesday to calm down a little more so I can just go back to the way I was before Tuesday.”

[Related: Updated Cincinnati Reds Depth Chart]

The move suggests the Reds won’t be trading Cozart before Monday’s deadline. Cozart has hit brilliantly (.317/.402/.568) over 322 plate appearances this season and is eligible for free agency next winter, but rumors about him were somewhat scarce in a market in which there was limited need for shortstops. He was briefly connected to the Red Sox before their acquisition of Eduardo Nunez to help at third base.

Share 0 Retweet 2 Send via email0

Cincinnati Reds Transactions Zack Cozart

East Notes: Nationals, Wilson, Tulowitzki, Straily
Main
Tigers Unlikely To Trade Justin Verlander Before Deadline
View Comments (38)
Post a Comment

38 Comments

  1. DoItDoug

    8 years ago

    I was thinking Jays with Tulo out. IF they weren’t selling.

    Reply
  2. Vottomatic

    8 years ago

    That sucks. Seeing what the other rentals fetched and considering outside of this year Cozart wasn’t always productive at the plate, I’d rather the reds get the comp pick. Hopefully when Cozart comes back healthy they mix in Peraza but better not bench Scooter at 2b. Reds fans, do you think we trade Suarez this off-season? I have been curious about him considering Senzel looks like he will be ready next year at some point. I remember them trading Frazier in 2015 with team control remaining.

    Reply
    • mrkinsm

      8 years ago

      The Reds won’t be getting a comp pick, no way that he turns down a 1 year 18 M$ deal this winter.

      Reply
      • bbatardo

        8 years ago

        Why wouldn’t he turn down 1 year 18m? He’s having a career year minus injuries so if he’s to get a multi year deal it’d be now.

        Reply
        • mrkinsm

          8 years ago

          No team is going to come even close to that, not with his age/injury history. He’d be a lock to accept – and the last thing the Reds need to do is spend 18M$ on another player next year when they won’t be competing.

          They should have traded him last year.

          Reply
        • FromTheCheapSeats

          8 years ago

          You hit on everything perfectly. The Reds are screwed.

          Reply
  3. Matt Galvin

    8 years ago

    They could still Trade him but get less in Trade know or wait intill August when healthy. Could Trade Suarez know if wanted to.

    Reply
    • mrkinsm

      8 years ago

      He’s not going to be traded in August, if he’s healthy he doesn’t clear waivers.

      Reply
      • hiflew

        8 years ago

        You could always trade him to the claiming team.

        Reply
        • mrkinsm

          8 years ago

          Only if the Reds want to shed 1 M$ for some peanuts, multiple teams will claim him (if he’s healthy).

          Reply
        • JKB 2

          8 years ago

          It does not matter if multiple teams claim him. That would be no different the one team claiming him

          Reply
        • mrkinsm

          8 years ago

          What?

          Reply
    • ksoze

      8 years ago

      Why would you trade Suarez?

      Reply
      • Vottomatic

        8 years ago

        Trade him in the off-season while his value is high. Senzel is tearing it up and almost ready.

        Reply
        • AZPat

          8 years ago

          I remember when people wanted to trade Votto because Alonzo was the next coming.

          Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          Are you really comparing the Suarez situation to the Votto one? Lol completely different.

          Reply
        • mrkinsm

          8 years ago

          The Reds would be dumb to call up Senzel any earlier than necessary. If they aren’t going to compete next year, then there is no reason for them to start his service clock.

          Reply
        • JKB 2

          8 years ago

          Well it will be hard to trade him and his high value in the offseason since his contract expires in October

          Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          Senzel is hitting .339 at AA right now. He will be 23 years old next summer. At some point you have to start bringing players up to make a change and to see what they’ve got. Bet you anything he gets brought up next year.

          Reply
        • mrkinsm

          8 years ago

          First week of November in 2020.

          Reply
  4. ryeandi

    8 years ago

    I still see him as a good fit for the D-backs. They can roll with they guys they have while he heals and then move Owings over to 2B (send Drury or Marte down). The CO/Drury MI combo is an inning killer.

    Reply
    • mrkinsm

      8 years ago

      He’s been dealing with this injury since May, he probably won’t be “healthy enough” for any contender to want him at this point. Tough break for him, fingers crossed he comes back quickly.

      Reply
  5. AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

    8 years ago

    Yet another player the Reds completely botched the trade (or in this case non-trade) of. Cueto, Leake, Chapman and now Cozart. Refused to trade him last year because “the offers weren’t good enough.” Hope they like getting jack squat for him!

    Reply
    • Vottomatic

      8 years ago

      They did not botch the Leake trade. They got an all-star in Adam Duvall. The other ones, that’s a different story lol.

      1
      Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        8 years ago

        They could have gotten more if they traded him in the offseason than they did by waiting until the deadline. A full season of Leake plus the right to extend him a QO is worth more than 2 months of Leake and no QO. Same situation with Cueto.

        Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          Yes, but at that time they were in a stage where they thought they could still contend.

          1
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          8 years ago

          1. So you admit that they botched the trade?
          2. Wait. Who exactly thought the Reds could contend in 2015?

          1
          Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          No, they did noy botch the leake trade. They thought they could contend. Go back and look at the off-season moves they made and it will reflect that. In 2013 they made the wild card. 2014 they went into the All-star break right near the top of the division before slumping in the second half. They thought they could bounce back. They did not get scrubs back for Leake.

          1
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          8 years ago

          If they thought they could contend they would have kept Latos and Simon (those were good trades for the Reds by the way). They were never going to contend. They wanted to try and look good for the All Star game that year and didn’t want to give up on extending Cueto even tho he was never going to extend in the first place. Duvall may be playing alright for the Reds now but I still can’t give them much credit for that trade cuz they could have gotten more for Leake (and Cueto) had they traded them the prior offseason.

          1
          Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          I understand some of what you are trying to say but I respectfully disagree that they botched the Leake trade. Sure, if they traded him sooner they could have gotten more in terms,of a prospect haul but who knows how that would have turned out. What I am saying is that the haul they got out of the deal they did make for Leake was a good one, therefore I don’t consider it botched. I do agree, as most reds fans will, they really screwed up a lot of trades. I remember when they turned down the Diamondbacks offer for Chapman at the 2015 deadline. Horrible but they are moving in the right direction now with their drafting I feel.

          1
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          8 years ago

          Cozart is the exact same situation. They refused to trade him for a good return when it was offered because it wasn’t a colossal overpay and now there is no market for him and he’s about to simply leave.
          Had they shopped Leake after the 2014 season the acquiring team would have gotten a full year of him and the right to QO him. His value went down between the offseason and the deadline when he was traded because those perks we’re lost. Same with Cueto, who was coming off a season where he would have won the Cy Young if Kershaw wasn’t even better.

          1
          Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          I think it is hard to say the same situation. When was there an offer made? There hasn’t really been much interest. Also, hos track record is not even close to what Chapman, Cueto, Leake, etc

          1
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          8 years ago

          Pretty sure I saw articles saying “X, y and z teams trying to trade for Zack Cozart” last offseason. Even my Padres were linked to him, but it made little sense for them to trade legitimate prospects for a rental.
          It’s the same situation in that they waited too long to trade him and it backfired.

          Reply
        • mrkinsm

          8 years ago

          The Mariners reportedly had an offer on the table for Cozart 12 months ago. The Reds failed to make the trade because they were too busy looking over medical reports on Mets farmhands.

          Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          The only known “offer” out on Cozart was last year at the deadline. We still don’t even know what the offer was so how can we judge? Also, other than that there have never been any teams seriously linked to him.

          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          8 years ago

          And they should have taken that offer when they had the chance. It couldn’t have been worse than just letting him walk (now the likely scenario)

          1
          Reply
        • Vottomatic

          8 years ago

          Okay but once again, we have no idea what the offer was. And I don’t think the reds thought that there would be this little interest in Cozart. Truth is we don’t know what is going to happen with Cozart. He likes Cincinnati and if there really are no teams interested in trading for him, what makes you think there are going to be teams willing to pay him a big deal? Truthfully, I think the reds want to keep him, as they have stated. If there isn’t a big market for him, I could see them coming to agreement on a 3 year deal or something like that. Just watch.

          Reply
        • mrkinsm

          8 years ago

          It was Gohara. They botched it.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Recent

    MLBTR Podcast: White Sox Ownership, Roman Anthony, And The Diamondbacks’ Rotation

    Phillies Designate Carlos Hernández For Assignment

    The Opener: Giants, Blue Jays, Injured Arms

    Blue Jays To Promote Will Robertson

    Casey Lawrence Elects Free Agency

    Diamondbacks Outright Aramis Garcia; Scott McGough Elects Free Agency

    Pirates Re-Sign Tanner Rainey To Minor League Deal

    Giants Place Matt Chapman On 10-Day Injured List

    Mariners’ Bryce Miller Out Four To Six Weeks With Elbow Inflammation

    Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is “North Of Zero”

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version