Headlines

  • Giants, Scott Kazmir Agree To Minor League Deal
  • Kelvin Herrera Announces Retirement
  • Braves Extend Brian Snitker
  • Yankees Sign Justin Wilson
  • Braves Sign Jake Lamb
  • Athletics Sign Mitch Moreland
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

2018 Competitive Balance Draft Pick Order

By Steve Adams | November 16, 2017 at 5:08pm CDT

Major League Baseball has set the order for Competitive Balance Rounds A and B of next year’s draft, reports Jonathan Mayo of MLB.com. Those rounds, which take place after the completion of the first and second rounds, respectively, are comprised of picks awarded to teams that are considered in the bottom 10 in terms of market size and/or revenue.

As Mayo explains, last season marked the beginning of MLB utilizing a more formulaic approach to determining Competitive Balance order rather than a lottery, as had been done in previous drafts since the Competitive Balance rounds’ inception prior to the 2013 season. The league’s formula took into account total revenue and winning percentage among the 14 teams that received Competitive Balance picks. Based on the results of that formula, the Rays, Reds, A’s, Brewers, Twins and Marlins were awarded the six picks in Comp Round A last year, with the other eight teams (D-backs, Padres, Rockies, Indians, Royals, Pirates, Orioles, Cardinals) all falling into Comp Round B.

Under the new system, those two groups will now flip on an annual basis, meaning the six teams that were awarded Comp Round A picks in 2017 will now comprise the teams selecting in Comp Round B. Likewise, the eight teams that comprised Comp Round B in 2017 will now comprise Comp Round A in 2018. Notably, the Rays will pick in both rounds, as they’ve received the No. 32 overall pick as compensation for failing to sign last year’s No. 31 overall pick, Drew Rasmussen.

According to Mayo, the rounds will play out as follows:

Round A

31. Pirates
32. Rays (Compensation for Rasmussen)
33. Orioles
34. Padres
35. D-backs
36. Royals
37. Indians
38. Rockies
39. Cardinals

Round B

70. Marlins
71. Athletics
72. Rays
73. Reds
74. Brewers
75. Twins

It should also be noted that this isn’t yet likely to represent the final draft order. Competitive Balance draft selections are the only picks that are eligible to be traded from one team to another under baseball’s collective bargaining agreement. These picks can only be traded during the regular season, though, and each pick can only be traded one time. (The Royals, for instance, cannot acquire the Orioles’ pick and then trade it to another team.)

The specific placement of these picks in the overall draft order figures to change as well as draft-pick compensation from qualified offers slightly alters the ordering of the picks both surrounding the Competitive Balance rounds. Generally speaking, though, this serves as a rough guideline for next summer’s draft and helps to provide a clearer picture of which teams will have the largest draft pools.

The Royals, for instance, could very well have five of the top 40 or so picks in the draft between their first-round selection, their Competitive Balance selection, and the likely comp picks for Eric Hosmer, Mike Moustakas and Lorenzo Cain (which would fall after the first round and before Competitive Balance Round A so long as each of that trio signs for $50MM or more in guaranteed money).

Meanwhile, the Rays stand to have six of the top 72 selections if Alex Cobb signs a contract worth more $50MM or more and would otherwise have six of the top 80 if he signs elsewhere for less than $50MM (which would push the compensatory pick for his free agency back after Competitive Balance Round B).

Share 0 Retweet 2 Send via email0

Uncategorized

All 9 Recipients Reject Qualifying Offer
Main
Giancarlo Stanton Wins National League MVP Award
41 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. mrnatewalter

    3 years ago

    Is there a limit of what a team’s payroll can be in order to receive this pick?

    That the Cardinals can have a likely payroll of way over $100MM (Cots Baseball has it at $126MM before any upgrades) and still get this pick is ridiculous. I don’t care what your “market size” is, if you can drop $150MM on payroll, you don’t need this pick.

    7 Like
    Reply
    • abgb123

      3 years ago

      So because Dewitt reinvests in his product, meaning its sounds as tho unlike many of those other teams in that listing he puts more profits into the team and what the team should be penalized?
      I for the life of me can not figure out why fans consistently side with ownerships when talking about salaries of players, why is it ok that the owner take more then 50% of the profit pie while raising prices and blaming escalating player salaries for said prices and lower competitive product.

      5 Like
      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        3 years ago

        If the Cardinals added Stanton last year, they would have been a top 10 payroll. There’s a strong chance that, by the end of the next season, they are there.

        The question is: should a team that can afford a top 10 payroll be getting a “competitive balance” draft pick?

        3 Like
        Reply
        • stl_cards16

          3 years ago

          And part of the reason they can potentially take on Stanton is because they gave a new TV deal starting in 2018.

          The Cardinals will be moving towards the larger market spending now.

          Like
          Reply
      • Wolf Chan

        3 years ago

        penalized? not getting an unfair advantage isn’t being penalized.

        3 Like
        Reply
        • Priggs89

          3 years ago

          THIS

          Like
          Reply
      • therealryan

        3 years ago

        No, the Cardinals should not be penalized. They also should not be getting extra draft pick compensation. Regardless of their market size, they are continuously one of the top 10 highest valued, highest revenue and most profitable teams. Not a team that needs the competitive balance draft compensation to survive playing against the big boys.

        4 Like
        Reply
        • tim815

          3 years ago

          Their “market”, if you know anything about the 1950’s-to-present, is Arkansas to New Mexico, into about half of Illinois, with Texas and part of Missouri scissored off.

          Like
          Reply
    • Birdwatcher

      3 years ago

      All teams have cash. Lots of it. Some just aren’t good at managing it.

      Like
      Reply
    • JFactor

      3 years ago

      It has to do with revenue, not payroll.

      As it should.

      Like
      Reply
      • Priggs89

        3 years ago

        Except that’s not true. It has to do with the team’s so-called “market,” and the St. Louis Cardinals’ market is SIGNIFICANTLY bigger than MLB gives it credit for.

        Like
        Reply
  2. WalkersDayOff

    3 years ago

    Ah so the Cardinals are still pretending to be a small market team and they get awarded a pickthe year immediately following their scandal. Its the Cardinal way!

    5 Like
    Reply
    • Brandon Burgess

      3 years ago

      The market is what it is. A team doesn’t decide. BTW, Go Cards!

      1 Like
      Reply
    • stl_cards16

      3 years ago

      If you don’t understand what “market” is, just say so.

      1 Like
      Reply
  3. PLyons

    3 years ago

    Rays could have 6 of the top 72 picks? Wow.
    Might anyone have a guess as to the dollar totals of all 30 teams at this point? (Of course, it will change with the signing of QO players, but I’m curious of the early projections.)

    Like
    Reply
    • Wolf Chan

      3 years ago

      the rays ought to forget MLB andd just become an AAA team – they get about the same attendance and are pretty much a development house for guys to be traded to other teams for guys that they can develop and trade to other teams.

      Like
      Reply
      • balloonknots

        3 years ago

        Great point but since I live in Tampa and love to go to see MLB games in person I’d rather Rays keep it up. I go to 20 games per year for about $400 in lower level and free parking.
        Pls trade all overpaid old farts as younger players are far more interesting!

        Like
        Reply
      • bucnole31658

        3 years ago

        They will be fine when they move the stadium out of st Pete where it is absolutely brutal to get to and from for a game.

        Like
        Reply
  4. Mattmang23

    3 years ago

    Ah yes, we have reached the part of the year where MLB awards competitive balance picks to four playoff teams and a fifth team that, arguably, is one of the top five most important and popular franchises in the league and has no discernable competitive disadvantage. This system needs fixing. Bounce the Cards from it, as well as any team that made the playoffs that season. Those teams seem to already be competitively balanced.

    2 Like
    Reply
    • Brandon Burgess

      3 years ago

      Right, we should penalize small market teams who do things right?

      1 Like
      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        3 years ago

        Good grief. We aren’t suggesting a “penalty”. We’re mentioning the absurdity that a team with a potential top ten payroll in baseball getting extra draft picks because of geography and stuff.

        2 Like
        Reply
        • thecoffinnail

          3 years ago

          Agreed, the Cardinals have no reason in getting a competitive balance pick.. This system definitely needs to be addressed.. Something like automatically putting playoff teams of small markets into the B category makes sense.. The inclusion of the Cardinals and the Orioles makes the process look flawed..

          1 Like
          Reply
      • Mattmang23

        3 years ago

        Small market? Lol. Only Cardinal fans think they are “small market.” The Cardinals’ market is far more vast than the St. Louis metro area. They have a nationwide following. They are the 7th most valuable MLB franchise as ranked by Forbes and “have generated a total of $200 million in operating income the past three seasons, more than any other baseball team.” Their TV deal is a 15 year/$1B deal kicking in in 2018. The team also owns 30% of Fox Sports Midwest and play to the third highest local TV ratings in baseball, making advertising income much easier to come by. Also from Forbes, in ESPN nationally televised games, the Cardinals were the 9th most successful team at garnering ratings this year, meaning they have more national TV appeal than 21 other MLB teams. This notion that they are some disadvantaged MLB property is disingenuous at best.

        Like
        Reply
        • MB923

          3 years ago

          Exactly right. They are the Green Bay Packers of baseball.

          2 Like
          Reply
    • Nuggethoarder

      3 years ago

      You are missing the point of these additional draft picks entirely. The First Year Player Draft is already designed to competitively balance teams based on their winning record…the teams with the worst records get to pick higher in every round, and those early picks in the first round are in general worth way more than the Competitive Balance picks.

      The point here is to give teams with fewer available resources a boost, to help them compete with the Yankees, Dodgers, and such. I guarantee you the Rays or A’s would forfeit their Competitive Balance Pick to be able to throw 200 million plus at their payroll each year.

      I get people griping about the Cardinals, but to say that playoff teams should not get these picks shows a fundamental lack of understanding regarding how the draft works, and why these picks exist.

      Like
      Reply
  5. thecoffinnail

    3 years ago

    How is it the Orioles get a Competitive Balance pick and the Nationals do not? Isn’t there still a lawsuit going on where the Orioles own most of the tv rights for their shared area and they take the lions share of the profits while just throwing crumbs to the Nats? Plus, they have payrolls consistently over $150 million a year ($182 million in 2017 according to Cot’s).. You can combine both the Rays and A’s payrolls ($178 million) and not get to what the Orioles spent last year..

    1 Like
    Reply
    • GoRav114

      3 years ago

      The Orioles pick last year was in group B so this year it is in A. Pretty simple

      Like
      Reply
  6. Pax vobiscum

    3 years ago

    It’s a travesty that these picks are available at all.

    4 Like
    Reply
    • balloonknots

      3 years ago

      Yes agreed! I vote a salary min and max for all MLB teams. Provide the fans with competitive balance instead of allowing MLB owners to fill their pockets by allowing large market teams cheap against AAAA talent

      Like
      Reply
      • balloonknots

        3 years ago

        Lol cheap WINS* against lesser talent
        Loosing 90 games but owners pocketing millions

        Like
        Reply
  7. GoRav114

    3 years ago

    Thanks for the clear concise info regarding

    Like
    Reply
  8. dswaim

    3 years ago

    If winning % is a factor in the formula how can the group A and group B teams flip flop from year to year?

    Like
    Reply
  9. JoeyPankake

    3 years ago

    Commie BS

    Like
    Reply
    • davbee

      3 years ago

      No, a salary cap is commie b.s.

      Like
      Reply
      • JoeyPankake

        3 years ago

        Revenue sharing is commie bs.

        Like
        Reply
  10. GarryHarris

    3 years ago

    Hi Steve Adams,
    I appreciate the post but I don’t understand how they came up with the order. Maybe my question is deeper than just this but, what does it resolve?

    The Yankees seem to always have the best system regardless of standings while the Padres are perennial losers but have weak systems. Is there some competitive edge the Yankees have in spite of having lower draft picks?.

    Like
    Reply
  11. Geez

    3 years ago

    I have to say that I enjoy the perennial article where Cardinal fans have the chance to get all defensive about the entitlement program. Enjoy your participation trophy

    Like
    Reply
  12. dudeness88

    3 years ago

    The way the old QO system worked, was it possible for KC to have had 4 picks in the top 30 had MLB not changed its rules on QO’s? I think the rule change was justified but man, that’s a tough break for them.

    Like
    Reply
  13. Phillies2017

    3 years ago

    Im down with dumping this system and making all picks available via trade like every other major sport.

    Its just crazy to me how one of those “small revenue teams” managed to hand out the richest contract in baseball history (Miami)

    Like
    Reply
    • Teufelshunde4

      3 years ago

      That was Loria over reacting to his perceived image that he was a cheap owner who only cared about his profit.
      Loria was a disaster as an owner.

      1 Like
      Reply
  14. brownbomber

    3 years ago

    St louis is a small market. Thats why 2 nfl teams left the area. One of the teams left for arizona. Which is one the teams on the list also. St louis just supports their team more than the larger market areas

    Like
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Giants, Scott Kazmir Agree To Minor League Deal

    Kelvin Herrera Announces Retirement

    Braves Extend Brian Snitker

    Yankees Sign Justin Wilson

    Braves Sign Jake Lamb

    Athletics Sign Mitch Moreland

    Yankees Re-Sign Brett Gardner

    Giants To Sign Jake McGee

    Mariners CEO Kevin Mather Resigns

    Athletics Sign Trevor Rosenthal

    Recent

    MLBTR Live Chat

    Astros Claim Robel Garcia

    Red Sox Acquire Zach Bryant From Cubs

    Quick Hits: Yankees, Cardinals, Diamondbacks

    MLBTR Poll: Forecasting The Yankees Rotation

    COVID Notes: Carlos Carrasco, Kevin Plawecki

    Giants, Scott Kazmir Agree To Minor League Deal

    Injury Notes: Naughton, Schmidt, Thorpe

    Outfielder Notes: Kirilloff, Kiermaier, Robles

    MLBTR Poll: Shortstop Extension Candidates

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Kris Bryant Rumors
    • Jackie Bradley Jr. Rumors
    • Jake Odorizzi Rumors
    • Taijuan Walker Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version