Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

MLBPA Extends Contract Of Executive Director Tony Clark

By Jeff Todd | November 28, 2018 at 10:21am CDT

The Major League Baseball Players Association has voted to extend the contract of executive director Tony Clark, according to Jared Diamond of the Wall Street Journal. His term of office is now due to run through 2022, meaning he’ll stay in charge through the duration of the five-year Basic Agreement he previously negotiated and lead the MLBPA as it prepares to hammer out a new one in 2021.

Clark, a long-time MLB player himself, took the top union post in December of 2013 after the untimely death of Michael Weiner. At the time, the sport was basking in the glow of booming economic growth and longstanding labor peace. The relatively pleasant pie-dividing process has more recently given way to some bickering at the table. Even as the money continues to stream in, teams have increasingly shown a reluctance to commit whopping future sums to relatively old free agents. That, in turn, has many questioning whether the MLBPA needs to craft a new strategic approach.

There are a whole host of interrelated factors at work, of course, including changes to the aging curve, the still-growing power of analytics in all aspects of the game, and perhaps also increasingly business-focused organizational leadership. And it’d be foolish to leap to any final conclusions about the nature of the player market. The best way to ensure revenue for a team, after all, is still to put a compelling product on the field. And the 2018 attendance drop no doubt was felt by some organizations. Competitive pressures still matter.

Still, the collective bargaining situation — in particular, the outcome of the 2016 negotiations — remains a notable factor in the changing labor market dynamics that have been met with no small amount of consternation by the players. As details of the 2016 CBA deal emerged, it became increasingly clear that the Clark-led union approach was one of tweaking the details of the existing system. There were modifications to the qualifying offer, a process that unfairly impacted a few veteran free agents but did not take a major bite out of the players’ overall take. The minimum salary crept up, as did the luxury tax line, and players added gained notable scheduling modifications and other changes to improve their lot.

At the same time, though, the MLBPA gave some notable concessions to the league that may well have dovetailed with other developments to hur the players’ collective bottom line. In particular, significant new penalties for spending over the luxury line held out the promise of constraining top-level payrolls. Meanwhile, a hard cap went in place for international signings, leaving virtually the entire amateur market subject to strict limits.

Those modifications have pressed established big leaguers from both sides, in a manner that was perhaps not easy to foresee in full. Teams are not only disincentivized from adding additional large salaries to finish off a roster, owing to the taxation scheme, but have less reason to do so given their ability to achieve excess value from young talent filtering up through the farm (which is cheaply replaced through the amateur market). An abundance of power arms, for example, has led to the cost-efficient approach of “bullpenning,” while big-market organizations like the Dodgers and Yankees have increasingly found ways to achieve excellent results without dishing out too many monster contracts. Of course, the more truly youthful players are pressed up to the majors, the sooner they’ll reach arbitration and free agency, and the more “prime” years they’ll have to sell.

It will likely take some time for the market changes to settle out and reveal themselves in full. Still, the problems from the players’ side were on display last winter, as numerous veterans found less receptive markets than they had anticipated. Clark went on a PR blitz as the market stagnated and filed a grievance against four teams that accuses them of failing to properly spend their revenue-sharing funds. As a practical matter, though, there wasn’t much that could be done at that point.

For Clark, looking ahead, there are strategic challenges aplenty. The union may need to consider trying more radical changes to its approach, which has traditionally benefited the most-established ballplayers while leaving relative crumbs for young major leaguers and high-end incoming amateurs (and actual crumbs for most minor-leaguers). Gambling money is another potentially game-changing financial boon for teams — and one that the players will not only want a piece of, but could utilize to their advantage from a public relations standpoint.

No doubt there are many possible strategies on the table. With a new lead negotiator to assist him, Clark is surely preparing for the 2021 CBA negotiations and the interim actions that might be taken. As veteran reliever Andrew Miller puts it, “We have confidence in Tony with where we are and where we’re going.”

Share 0 Retweet 12 Send via email0

Uncategorized Tony Clark

Market Chatter: Indians, Moose, Cano, Diaz, Thor, Pads
Main
Mets To Hire Allard Baird, Adam Guttridge As Assistant GM’s
View Comments (56)
Post a Comment

56 Comments

  1. rivera42

    7 years ago

    Nice. The players must be happy with the incompetent Clark at the helm.

    3
    Reply
    • dimitrios in la

      7 years ago

      Well he’s a union guy so therefore often blinded by self interest.

      3
      Reply
    • iverbure

      7 years ago

      The players were the one who bargained for personal chefs over other important stuff. The comment section is going to be filled here with ridiculous suggestions like salary floor or salary caps which won’t solve the tanking problem one bit.

      2
      Reply
      • dimitrios in la

        7 years ago

        I don’t think that Clark and his union members understand how ridiculously self-serving they sound. Unions consistently grow out of a real need (God bless Curt Flood!) and they consistently devolve into destructive entities, serving “the worker’s needs” at the expense of so many other factors. UAW would be textbook example. California Teachers Union another.

        2
        Reply
        • pjmcnu

          7 years ago

          Unions seem no longer necessary when they are effective over a long period of time. However, when people lose sight of the fact that things are good for workers BECAUSE of the union’s sustained efforts, and either eliminate them (or they become ineffective), management/ownership slowly starts to push & roll back gains. Soon those who thought unions were unnecessary relics find increased income inequality, failure of labor to share in their companies success, workforce reductions, benefits reduced or eliminated (including pensions), and learn one great lesson: ownership/mgmt appeared not to be like the owners/managers of the late 19th/early 20th century only because they were checked by unions. With unions gone or neutered, the modern owner is perfectly happy to resurrect old habits. In other words, it was effective opposition, not a magical evolution or moral elevation, that brought us kinder, gentler appearing ownership. I think labor in many industries are finding this out now.

          Reply
  2. iverbure

    7 years ago

    Players are going to get absolutely pumped in this next CBA with this guy. They cried about the CBA last year while smart players went on shows and said hey guys we not only agreed to the CBA but we actually bargained for some of the very things that are causing the free agent freeze last year.

    Like bill James and other great minds have said the players are all replaceable, that’s a inconvenient fact for the players.

    2
    Reply
    • stansfield123

      7 years ago

      They’re not replaceable, though. Obviously. No one would watch the league if the best baseball players in the world weren’t in it.

      3
      Reply
      • bobtillman

        7 years ago

        I’m not sure that that is true. James got misunderstood. His point, a perfectly logical one, is that there would be still be a Cy Young award winner, a batting champion, etc., etc. In any group of 750 players, there would be some that would rise to the top. Fans wouldn’t notice if it was Mookie Betts or Joe Jones.

        3
        Reply
        • stansfield123

          7 years ago

          Oh, so you mean if someone gathered up the thousand best baseball players, killed them and buried them in the woods, then they would be replaceable?

          Yes, that is true. But, even in today’s enlightened society, committing mass murder to further your business interests carries a certain stigma.

          Reply
        • JKB 2

          7 years ago

          Bob Tillman you have to be kidding me.

          I would notice a Mookie Betts or Joe Jones difference. But hey thats just me. You naturally would not notice

          Reply
        • bobtillman

          7 years ago

          man, you really struggle with some easy stuff, don’t you…..

          Reply
      • iverbure

        7 years ago

        They’re very much replaceable his point was if every player disappeared they’re would be a small downturn of talent for about 2 years and after that business would return to normal. This isn’t for debate, this is fact. If you don’t believe this to be true you can thank the PA for duping you into thinking they aren’t.

        3
        Reply
        • stansfield123

          7 years ago

          Disappeared how?

          Reply
        • Cam

          7 years ago

          Hypothetical, to emphasize the point that the game is bigger than the players.

          Reply
        • pjmcnu

          7 years ago

          You can always tell when someone cannot back up their broad assertion with evidence because they say it’s “not up for debate.”

          Reply
    • davidcoonce74

      7 years ago

      Umm, I know Bill James remembers 1995 Spring Training, I assume you do too; I remember it well – the reason why the owners and players reached a settlement was because we got a real look at how “replaceable” the players are – and nobody liked that look. The baseball was terrible, and if MLB had actually proceeded with playing the season with replacement players they might have destroyed the sport.

      Oh and do you remember what MLB was going to pay the replacement players? It was 10,000 dollars for the season, assuming the players made the roster, with a minor league pay scale for work during the season. Basically, the players were going to be paid less than a Wal-Mart cashier to play Major League Baseball. And, of course, if the league had used replacement players many of the minor league teams – which play in union-shop ballparks – couldn’t have had a season at all, and neither of the Canadian teams could have played a game b/c Canada’s union laws don’t allow for replacement workers.

      So Bill James is wrong – I admire the man’s work greatly, but he’s quite wrong on this, because evidence shows that, when tried, it was a spectacular failure.

      6
      Reply
      • iverbure

        7 years ago

        I agree James is smarter than everyone here and every single player is replaceable hopefully we see how right he is.

        Reply
        • davidcoonce74

          7 years ago

          Facts are a funny thing – we have factual evidence that the players are not replaceable. But hey, you do you.

          3
          Reply
    • Lance

      7 years ago

      Owners are replaceable, too.

      Reply
      • iverbure

        7 years ago

        Less owners to replace other owners than they’re players to replace players.

        Reply
  3. Free Clay Zavada

    7 years ago

    the players are screwed LOL. how clueless are these voters?

    3
    Reply
  4. Chris Giarraputo

    7 years ago

    Wow! I’m surprised. No offense to Clark, he always seemed like a very intelligent person hearing him talk as a player but……MLB is changing and teams are spending less and not wanting to sign a player 30 yo+ for more then a few years due to basic analytics now. I think the players association needs a calm and controlled leader but, a bulldog too at the same time. The last CBA the owners won. And now we will see how much love the Vets get when the next CBA is signed. If baseball keeps trending towards tanking, not signing players because u don’t want to win or just want to put the money in ownerships pockets will the team is a mess plus other issues then is Clark ready to fight? Does he have the balls to threaten a strike? That’s the only way to get what you want from 30+ multi billionaire owners or companies who own teams. They don’t lose easily hence their power and wealth.

    Time for a salary floor and penalties for tanking, poor management (Mets, Baltimore come to mind) and rewarding teams for winning and not filling the pockets of teams getting luxery tax $ and getting creative to not really use it to contend.
    Their is no reason why at min 50% of teams should be thinking they have a chance a playoffs. No reason!!!!! I don’t want the MLB to turn into the NBA with super teams and recklace spending on bad character players. NBA is competitive sometimes not all the time and it’s obvious players don’t give 100%. But the NBA used to be great!!! Now I get sad watching athletes with no skills. But, baseball has the minors so their is hope. But, tanking has to go and go soon. A salary floor should be 1 of the top 2-3 topics being worked on now

    5
    Reply
    • iverbure

      7 years ago

      You don’t want Mlb to turn into nba? Don’t they have a salary cap and floor?

      Reply
      • davidcoonce74

        7 years ago

        Yes, and check out that competitive balance! Can you imagine a league with the same two teams making the finals four straight years? Never happen with the “competitive balance” provided by a salary cap, right?

        2
        Reply
      • Chris Giarraputo

        7 years ago

        I meant in regards to tanking and giving out huge contracts to very young players and wondering why they stop improving once they get a 5 year $150mil contract. And basketball is so boring now. The minirs which in NBA for decades was 3-4 years college ball and players leave once they can get paid by being high draft pick while not being ready and developed for the NBA game. NBA game is stale and I can’t imagine have the same allure as it did 15 years ago. Football too has changed. And I think for the worse besides head injuries. Baseball is at a crossroad. I believe the next CBA will start the game I’m a great direction or a bad 1. No In between

        1
        Reply
  5. realgone2

    7 years ago

    Wow. I’d be pissed if I was a young player.

    2
    Reply
  6. stansfield123

    7 years ago

    So the players are happy with the current CBA, and the fact that the average payroll WENT DOWN in 2018, while revenues continue to rise?

    Cool. Looking forward to more of the same.

    4
    Reply
  7. hiflyer000

    7 years ago

    I’m stunned by this. Clark is completely incompetent and let the owners hand him his lunch in the last CBA battle. I don’t know why incompetence is always so rewarded in this country.

    3
    Reply
  8. lowtalker1

    7 years ago

    He is the problem

    3
    Reply
  9. bobtillman

    7 years ago

    Like any union, the MLBPPA has become infested with management sympathizers. Marvin Miller must be flipping in his grave watching player compensation decrease as revenues/profits increase. The new Fox deal, the new MGM deal….all this while half the teams “tank” and, MOST INCOMPREHENSIBLY, get their fan bases to agree with it. It smacks of the day when you were required to “tip” the executioner before he chopped your head off.

    I had some hope that the new CBA would flatten the landscape a bit, but now I’m not too sure.

    1
    Reply
    • lowtalker1

      7 years ago

      = more ticket prices

      Reply
      • stansfield123

        7 years ago

        Prices are determined by supply and demand, not by how the revenues are shared within the seller’s organization.

        If the players worked for free, the price of your tickets would be EXACTLY THE SAME.

        1
        Reply
  10. Kayrall

    7 years ago

    This will not end well.

    2
    Reply
    • rivera42

      7 years ago

      … for the players. The owners have to be thrilled about this.

      1
      Reply
      • Kayrall

        7 years ago

        For everyone. Similar to socialism, eventually people wise up to the ravages of poor decisions and a period of chaos ensues.

        5
        Reply
        • Vizionaire

          7 years ago

          only unintelligent people bring politics into baseball talk.

          2
          Reply
        • xabial

          7 years ago

          Kayrall’s one of the funniest, wittiest and most intelligent posters here. honestly, one my faves

          I may be hated by everyone but still allowed to have favorites Lol. Longtime fan here, Kayrall!

          3
          Reply
        • stansfield123

          7 years ago

          Re vizionaire:

          Only deeply unintelligent people could possibly think that an election isn’t a political process.

          2
          Reply
        • rivera42

          7 years ago

          Wait–why are you hated by everyone?

          1
          Reply
        • xabial

          7 years ago

          Cuz I post a lot, usually first in threads.

          For some reason, posting a lot here , especially first in threads, triggers people. Yesterday’s MGM deal thread was a prime example..

          Removing posts is a delicate subject here (unless you bring up divisive race, and/or political topics) so tend to take a lot of harassment… Off topic, personal attacks getting nastier and nastier… that usually stick, unless Jeff throws me a bone.

          2
          Reply
        • rivera42

          7 years ago

          Eh? Don’t these people know that this is the Internet? Unless you’re trolling, what’s the big deal? Posting a lot/first to post is getting under people’s skin? Geez.

          Keep your head up, X. What does your usename stand for, btw?

          Reply
        • Kayrall

          7 years ago

          I’m not sure if you were around during that period, but I have a feeling that people are still quite jaded from the golden era of Bigpapi4evr.

          2
          Reply
  11. Vizionaire

    7 years ago

    maybe, the players wanted clarck to correct the past mistakes?

    Reply
  12. Codeeg

    7 years ago

    I don’t even care about the CBA, it’d be nice if he could find a way to get minor league players more pay.

    4
    Reply
    • Chris Giarraputo

      7 years ago

      I totally agree with you. Especially now that teams are openly (dirty secret) keeping players in Minirs to gain more team control and these players have families to support.

      4
      Reply
    • pjmcnu

      7 years ago

      Agree re: minors pay. There is no reason they can’t be paid a living wage. I mean, did ownership REALLY need to get Congress to tuck a provision in the recent tax cut law that exempts teams from paying minor leaguers MINIMUM WAGE? Seriously? Multi-billion dollar business and you can’t pay guys minimum wage? Unconscionable.

      Reply
  13. xabial

    7 years ago

    Tony Clark is a champ. Scapegoat champion.

    All 30 teams can spend up to 206M w/o penalty whatsoever. Hope he wins grievance filed against those 4 teams, especially “Spend nutting, get nutting” Bob Nutting,

    Reply
  14. Chris Giarraputo

    7 years ago

    I would think an attorney with experience in mitigation, contracts, negotiations….ect would be a better option. Of course they are on staff but, Clark seems too nice and I would not want an EX employee of my job (league) negotiationing for me. I assume he gets a salary and has some power even just Show power. The players need someone Imo who never played to Run the union with ex players as assistants and consultants. Fehr wasn’t an ex player and I think he did a good job running union. Clark is too close to the teams and executives. You have to give to get but, he doesn’t seem to have a long term plan. You need to think 10+ years down the line as this next CBA can improve or really hurt the league. And shift rules need to be put in place. More shifts have been making players want to hit HR’s since their are no fielders in the seats. I miss base hits and action. And the game is losing young fans.

    2
    Reply
  15. carausda

    7 years ago

    The new Lead Negotiator, Bruce Meyer, is the key to the negotiations for the players in the new CBA. Check the link at the end of the article. Apparently he is the go to guy for player negotiations across several of the major sports.

    2
    Reply
  16. Altanta Barves

    7 years ago

    This move makes MLB very happy. The players are going to get pwned.

    2
    Reply
  17. Dock_Elvis

    7 years ago

    Atleast these union guys dont have to be walking a hotel picket line and watch other union workers cross it.

    Reply
  18. 66TheNumberOfTheBest

    7 years ago

    …………………………………………………why?

    Reply
  19. pjmcnu

    7 years ago

    The most basic need is to modify the team control rules. The excuse for team control was that it provided cost certainty for developing players, because those whose talent & staying power got them to free agency after 6 years were getting the big bucks. The new view that anyone over 30 is over the hill (or very soon to become so) combined with game-playing with service time to turn 6 years into 7 has allowed teams to have team control over the entire “prime” (as newly defined) of all but those players who debut at a very young age. In essence, if debut at age 23 or older, you are under team control until you’re 30, then declared “too old” for a large or long contract. If analytics truly says this, and is correct, then control years needs to be addressed or an equitable split between ownership and players will continue to tilt more & more heavily towards ownership, and labor unrest will occur.

    Reply
    • OverUnderDone

      7 years ago

      Honestly sounds like you have a better grasp of the problem than Tony C.

      Reply
  20. jd396

    7 years ago

    Manfred and Clark deserve each other.

    1
    Reply
  21. OverUnderDone

    7 years ago

    I don’t know what the solution is to the union getting completely worked in the last negotiation, but it definitely ain’t supporting the guy who was in charge.

    I’ve been very sympathetic to the players’ cause until now, but if they’re not going to help themselves, so be it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Notes: Scherzer, Varsho, Francis

    Pirates Reportedly Receiving Interest In Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    Angels Sign Ben Gamel To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version