Headlines

  • Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death
  • Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List
  • Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros
  • Evan Longoria To Sign One-Day Contract, Retire As Member Of Rays
  • Diamondbacks To Promote Jordan Lawlar
  • Rockies Fire Bud Black
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Trade Rumblings: Lindor, Padres, Dodgers, Betts, Yanks, Schwarber

By Connor Byrne | December 19, 2019 at 12:55am CDT

The Padres have at least kicked around the idea of attempting to swing a deal for Indians shortstop Francisco Lindor, Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reports (subscription link). However, Rosenthal cautions that the superstar probably won’t end up in San Diego, which already has an enviable left side of the infield between shortstop Fernando Tatis Jr. and third baseman Manny Machado. In the unlikely event the Padres do wind up with Lindor, it seems they’d try to turn Tatis into a multi-position player (primarily a center fielder), though Rosenthal notes doing so could displease the 20-year-old and would likely receive pushback from his representatives. That’s important considering San Diego’s desire to extend the phenom.

On the plus side, in addition to picking up an elite player in Lindor, the Padres would keep him away from the division-rival Dodgers, who have been connected to him this winter. But the Lindor-related talks between LA and Cleveland have only been “preliminary” to this point, per Buster Olney of ESPN (subscription). The Indians, for their part, aren’t necessarily under pressure to trade Lindor right now – he still has two years’ control left and remains the best player on a team that has been a consistent playoff contender in recent seasons. That said, the Indians don’t appear to have much of a chance to extend Lindor, so perhaps they’ll be open to parting with him this winter.

Let’s check in on a couple more of baseball’s highest-profile trade candidates…

  • Bob Nightengale of USA Today reported earlier this week that the Red Sox and Dodgers have had “exploratory trade talks” in regards to Boston outfielder Mookie Betts. The Dodgers have even included shortstop Corey Seager in discussions centering on Lindor and Betts, Nightengale relays. However, even though Betts only has a year of control left (in which he should make almost $30MM via arbitration), and even though the Red Sox are working to get under the $208MM luxury tax, it doesn’t look as if there’s any hurry to part with the former AL MVP. Instead, it seems the Red Sox’s preference is to trade from their starting staff, tweets the Boston Globe’s Alex Speier, who hears that they and the Dodgers “had virtually no engagement” in regards to Betts at last week’s Winter Meetings.
  • More from Rosenthal, who writes that the Yankees’ years-long interest in Cubs outfielder Kyle Schwarber has continued. Nevertheless, there’s no momentum toward a deal as of now, Rosenthal adds. Schwarber has been a favorite of the Cubs’ front office, though trading him could be part of an offseason shakeup for a club that fell apart late in 2019. The 26-year-old slugger still has two seasons of arbitration eligibility remaining, and he’s coming off a pair of above-average campaigns, so he’d likely be difficult for the Yankees or anyone else to acquire.
Share 0 Retweet 8 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Chicago Cubs Cleveland Guardians Los Angeles Dodgers New York Yankees San Diego Padres Corey Seager Francisco Lindor Kyle Schwarber Mookie Betts

Details On Luxury Tax Bills For Red Sox, Cubs, Yankees
Main
Reds Reportedly Exploring Francisco Lindor Trade Scenarios
View Comments (165)
Post a Comment

165 Comments

  1. Dalton1017

    5 years ago

    Rangers are going to get Arenado. dont forget that one

    Reply
    • hiflew

      5 years ago

      No they aren’t. Don’t forget that one.

      12
      Reply
    • dany8484

      5 years ago

      Hahaha

      Reply
    • angt222

      5 years ago

      Think St. Louis would have a better chance at acquiring Arenado than TEX.

      Reply
    • yogineely

      5 years ago

      Nope

      Reply
    • Dodgerdawgs 2

      5 years ago

      Dodgers would have the pieces to get him especially since they would include Seager, who I think would better at 3rd over SS,in a package but don’t see it because of the same division thing

      Reply
      • Jim Emmons

        5 years ago

        I’d love to see that trade made. Not to sign over the farm to Colorado, but a package worth their consideration. His contract runs through his age 36 season which isn’t awful, however I can’t see LA taking on a pact of that duration and see even less likelihood of the Rockies dealing with LA unless the Dodgers over-pay. You can’t deny that Arenado is a helluva player. Speaking of ‘can’t see’, why did they extend his contract if they had thoughts of possibly moving him? Very Stanton’esque.

        Reply
    • Dalton1017

      5 years ago

      the trade will be such.

      Rangers trade Odor Jung Allard Winn Tavaras and Heirberto Hernandez

      Rockies trade Ian Desmond and Nolan Arenado

      Rockies get Jung who was considered one of the better college bats out of last years draft. They get Allard who has a decent floor and a ceiling of probably a #3 Taveras who is at this point a defense first prospect who make alot of contact and has the potential to be a solid CF and Hernandez who is an exciting young prospect with a ton of power. they also take on Desmond contract which is much worse the Odor’s

      Reply
      • Dalton1017

        5 years ago

        when i say Desmond contract is worse i mean paying him 25 mil over 2 years is worse then paying Odor 37 mil over 3

        Reply
  2. mlb1225

    5 years ago

    If the Padres were to trade for Lindor, why not just move Tatis Jr. to 2B? Seems like it would make more sense to put him there than CF. At least in CF, they have an elite defender. At 2B, Profar isn’t great on either side of the ball.

    11
    Reply
    • TheMick7

      5 years ago

      The problem in have with the way this article written is that there’s no indication of which pieces would return to Cleveland. It would probably take Tatis or Gore as the centerpiece of a multi-player return anyway. Highly doubtful this trade ever comes to fruition. Lindor will probably be with them until he hits FA.

      As for Dodgers/Sox, it makes very little sense to send back Seager unless I’m missing something. The already have Xander at SS and Denver’s at third…..

      2
      Reply
      • Ezpkns34

        5 years ago

        They wouldn’t take Lindor for Tatis straight up, put down the bong

        11
        Reply
        • andyg37

          5 years ago

          Looks like to me like he said “centerpiece of a multiplayer return.” You should probably follow your own advice.

          2
          Reply
        • Daynlokki

          5 years ago

          Which would be why he said they wouldn’t even do it straight up, meaning they definitely wouldn’t with extra pieces going? Maybe you should follow the advice given.

          2
          Reply
        • rocknwell

          5 years ago

          That made no sense. I think you’re on the funny stuff too.

          Reply
        • yogineely

          5 years ago

          Lindor way more valuable

          Reply
        • YODA777

          5 years ago

          2 years of Lindor is more valuable than 5 years of Tatis? I would much rather have Tatis.

          1
          Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        5 years ago

        As for Seager, Someone (most likely him) could always be flipped.

        On another front, imagine a 20 year old in the real world trying to dictate his working conditions.

        Reply
        • Appalachian_Outlaw

          5 years ago

          In the “real world” you can choose your employer instead of being drafted, and switch employers if you don’t care for the working conditions. You’re not bound somewhere for a decade. I see fans try to make that comparison, but it’s just not the same. Plus maybe he gets hurt trying to learn a new position, or just isn’t as good there; which hurts his future earning power.

          Reply
        • Cam

          5 years ago

          Bad example, considering most 20 year olds in the real world actually get to have a choice in where they work.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          I’m confused how both of you (Daynlokki & Ezpkns) re confused. As Andy said confirmed what’s meant, why would it make more sense to say they wouldn’t do it straight up so they definitely wouldn’t do it with MORE pieces. It works the others way around. Lindor would not be trades for Tatis straight up, EVER (Indians).

          Indians would require Tatis, plus more, hence, as my astute friend Andy noted, my saying Tatis or Gore would be the centerpiece, which they (Padres) wouldn’t do.

          So, from the person who said it, please take Andy’s advice and your own, because inhaling down you no favors.

          Hope that clarifies the confusion. Oh yeah, read first, then respond, without insult, unless you want to look dumb…. mission accomplished(?)……. queue the bubbling sound……

          Reply
        • spinach

          5 years ago

          It’s called the tech industry. (Since the massive entertain industry isn’t part of the world.)

          Reply
        • jbrown1453

          5 years ago

          he isn’t real world. He just chose to play baseball instead of working somewhere else. When he child’s baseball he chose to play by their rules

          Reply
        • jbrown1453

          5 years ago

          he is in the real world. He just chose to play baseball instead of working somewhere else. When he child’s baseball he chose to play by their rules

          Reply
        • Tomfromsd

          5 years ago

          TheMick7 – Lindor is a good player.

          But to claim that it would take Tatis and then some for Lindor is at best optimistic, at worst crazy.

          Tatis put up 4.2 WAR in 84 games in 2019, while Lindor put up 4.7 WAR in 143 games. Tatis, playing a full year, would probably have topped Lindor’s numbers. He doesn’t have the same track record, granted, but if he fulfills the potential that pretty much every scout in baseball foresees, Tatis could be a superior player to Lindor as early as next season.

          Then, consider the fact that Tatis is 6 years younger, cheaper and controllable for longer, and I just don’t see how anyone can make your case. I agree with the others. In SD’s shoes, I wouldn’t trade Tatis for Lindor straight up, let alone throwing more in the deal.

          But all of this is besides the point, because the article clearly states that if SD does trade for Lindor, SD fully expects to keep Tatis anyways and move him around, rather than include him in any deal. Other prospects would be the ones in play.

          1
          Reply
        • kidaplus

          5 years ago

          Given age, years of control, salary and position Tatis is probably the most most valuable asset in baseball…

          It’d be like someone offering someone for 10lbs silver in exchange for 10lbs of diamond encrusted gold.

          He has absolutely no bearing on a potential deal as Cleveland would never ever ever ever even mention him in return for two years of Lindor.

          Oh and BTW… a person epically dumb enough to type … “It would probably take Tatis or Gore as the centerpiece of a multi-player return anyway”… ie one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard… lecturing someone about looking dumb id priceless.

          Everyone, do yourself a favor and read that while picturing Dax Shepard’s character from Idiocricy.

          You’re welcome…

          Reply
        • Priggs89

          5 years ago

          Nah. That title belongs to Acuna and his ridiculously team friendly contract.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          5 years ago

          Disagree. Most 20 year olds take the first job offer they get assuming college. Even those with options, don’t put restrictions on a job offer at that age. There can’t be a Wild West atmosphere and most understand as they get experience, options eventually open up. They chose this career.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          TomfromSD – I don’t disagree with your assessment based on the metrics. I am speaking to what the Indians would consider doing. In my opinion, they would not do a straight up trade, neither would the Padres, for Lindor.

          Thus, I used Tatis as the most extreme example of why a trade for lesser prospects would never work.

          So, if Indians would not trade for Tatis or Gore +, they sure won’t trade for lesser prospects.

          I could be wrong and they could Kluber this deal, but that is my assessment of the Indians valuation of Lindor.

          Also, thank you for providing a mature, cogent response, rather than the pompous individual(s) in this thread.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Kidaplus, if you resort to insults it exposes your lack of intelligence. If you read my comment I’m speaking to what the Indians would/wouldn’t do. If you read the thread, I refer to them being dumb for misinterpreting my statement, and then resorting to insults to validate their opinions, like you.

          So, my opinion still stands… Indians would demand Gore or Tatis as the centerpiece in a trade.

          I didn’t say it was fair, or that they are comparable in metrics. Taking my statements out of context does not make your point, unless you point is that the Indians would give up Lindor without demanding Gore or Tatis, in which case, I can’t help you.

          So, in response to your assertion, if that is one of the dumbest things you’ve heard, you’re either so stupid you don’t know it or you’re surrounded by the most intellectual people in the baseball industry, like GMs who can make such definitive claims.

          Reply
        • yogineely

          5 years ago

          Do you want to look dumb? Re read that message and tell me it makes sense. queue my bong sound and I’ll still know how to put a sentence together. Love all these dudes making fun of stoners but can’t put a sentence together

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Which comment, there were a few? Yogineely, I hope you’re not going grammar police because of texting and autocorrect on my phone. I clarified it above for someone like you. I’m here to talk baseball, not deal with people that cannot grasp context. If you’re picking apart grammar, you simply are hiding behind your own incompetence.

          Reply
        • ck99

          5 years ago

          The big risk with Tatis is that he’s had two significant injuries in his rookie year, while he’s 20. Is this going to continue? Hopefully not, but anyone considering a trade for Tatis will have to consider that.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Hey, yogineely, speaking of putting a sentence together….nice grammar, doofus. We use capitals, periods, and we hyphenate words; we don’t just place random spaces in between them. So, queue your bong sound and you’ll still think you know how to put a sentence together. I shall call you Glass House from now on. Word to the wise, and you too yogineely, if you are going to make fun of other’s sentence structures and grammar, please don’t write like a fifth-grader while doing so. It has a certain ring of stupidity, if you get my drift.

          Reply
      • Deleted Userrr

        5 years ago

        Neither Tatis nor Gore is getting traded for a guy with only two years on his contract. Sorry.

        1
        Reply
        • Wolverines2

          5 years ago

          EXACTLY.

          Reply
      • T-Dawg

        5 years ago

        Who’s Denver’s? You mean Rafael Devers?

        Reply
      • keepinthafaithsd1

        5 years ago

        There is no way that we will let even smell Tatis jrs jockstrap for 2 yrs of Lindor. Gore is the ONLY prospect that will not be traded unless some guy named Trout (or like player w contract) is coming for him. And please everyone please stop blaming marijuana for these peoples obvious crack problem.

        1
        Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          That’s exactly my point, keepinthafaith, which is why I postulated such a trade would never come to fruition.

          And yes, Denver’s was an autocorrect while phone-swipe-texting. So, if a name correction is all you have, when you clearly know who I meant, you need a new occupation, uh T-dawg; or, one may point out you spelled dog wrong, if one were to be as pretentious as you are.

          Nonetheless, let’s read the original transcript and agree that the two (Crack smokers) who began the personal attacks did so upon the pretext I was positing Gore or Tatis would actually be traded, because I didn’t. In fact, that thought process is antithetical to mine.

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          5 years ago

          Why do Padre fans always obsess on “smelling their players jockstraps?” Is it a thing in San Diego?

          1
          Reply
        • Just_a_thought

          5 years ago

          My guess is they are convinced it’s the closest thing to sniffing the playoffs

          1
          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Nothing T-dog? Wow, thanks for your profound contribution to a baseball conversation! You may have a career in this, so I encourage you, sir, don’t stop now, you’re well on your way.

          Reply
        • Vin Scully

          5 years ago

          Your comment is incoherent. Maybe you are the one with a drug problem.

          Reply
        • Vin Scully

          5 years ago

          Yes it is.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Hey Vin, not sure which comment you are referring to, sir. There were a bunch in this thread.

          Reply
      • sdskittles

        5 years ago

        An article on MLB has this for a trade:

        Padres get: SS Francisco Lindor

        Indians get: RHP Luis Patino (MLB’s No. 30 prospect), SS CJ Abrams (MLB’s No. 45 prospect), OF Manuel Margot, RHP Cal Quantrill

        For me, I would rather trade Trammel than Abrams.

        Reply
        • YODA777

          5 years ago

          I would add Trammel to that pile if Cleveland included Clevinger.

          Reply
        • hockeyjohn

          5 years ago

          Cleveland won’t trade Lindor for just prospects. They are not rebuilding. They want controllable MLB ready players. The Indians already have four center fielders (Mercado, Deshields, Allen, and Zimmer) so they do not need Margot and Quantrill would not make our roster as a starter. This offer makes no sense for the Cleveland Indians.

          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          5 years ago

          Yes they will trade him for just prospects and if they trade Lindor then absolutely they are rebuilding. You can’t trade Lindor and simultaneously make the team better in the near term. And the Indians need to make the team better, not worse, if they want to contend.

          Reply
      • dbenzz

        5 years ago

        Pads are definitely not trading Tatis or Gore

        Reply
    • rocky7

      5 years ago

      Another day another typical Padres rumor….day late and a dollar short….seemingly very good 20 year old shortstop in Tatis Jr. and Manny at 3rd, but not satisfied….seems like the Rock Star GM likes to read his name or his teams name thrown around for any and every major talent out there or just likes to tinker with the already successful talent on his team.
      Break up the Padres…..already too successful to read about!

      Reply
    • padam

      5 years ago

      The only place the Padres would be moving Tatis if they acquired Lindor is to Cleveland.

      Reply
      • TheMick7

        5 years ago

        padam: Be careful, sir. I said something similar and was all but crucified for it, although that deal won’t ever happen in my opinion.

        Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          5 years ago

          I’m not going to crucify anyone. But I will say that there is no way Tatis is traded for any player who can be a free agent in 2 years.

          Reply
    • Show all 44 replies
  3. pasha2k

    5 years ago

    I hope they trade Betts, he doesn’t want yo sign in Boston, so trade him, n they can send big mouth Price with him, who can’t say a civil word to a HOFer Eck, whose done nothing but be honest!

    1
    Reply
    • ForestCobraAL

      5 years ago

      Mookie to Cincinnati.

      3
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        5 years ago

        Seattle. Great city but their present losing environment combined with the worst traveling of any big league club can make one understand how fortunate playing baseball as a career players really are. Comment was meant in general, not specifically towards Mookie.

        Reply
        • Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA

          5 years ago

          Because the minors don’t do that? Maybe after 10 years, he may just really want the opportunity to experience FA. With the grind that’s involved, the general inability to have a basic amount of control and decision over their lives, for such a significant portion of their career, I never begrudge a ballplayer for wanting to control their next destination no matter what their motivations are.

          I know fans like to speak from this high point position as to players not understanding how great they have it, but the simple fact is guys have zero control once that first contract is signed and owners have it for upwards of 11-14 years. And in the end it’s the price you pay for the career and money, but it’s also an established carrot a player earns. So this thought that a player get stuck in a bad situation to prove some sort of flawed point seems childish and ridiculous especially if said player/s are good guys that use their platform for good. It just makes it petty in a general sense.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          5 years ago

          Childish? Who’s kidding who? the comment was meant tongue in cheek because unless Seattle has talent I’m not aware of, the team would be worse off trading Mookie there. Athletes in many cases act like spoiled kids. Look at the article and referencing Tatis. Players earn rights and for most Sox fans, it’s the unusual feeling that Mookie is holding the team hostage. He won’t take their money now and is saying the right things, teasing how he loves Boston.

          1
          Reply
        • Vandals Took The Handles

          5 years ago

          If I had a dollar for every MLB player in my lifetime that entered their walk year saying they loved the franchise they played for and people and the city that they played in, only to turn down an obscene contract from their team to sign an even more obscene contract with a team in another city…….

          Reply
        • cpt redbeard

          5 years ago

          so you would have a dollar..

          if you’re trying to get rich you should say ” for each player”

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          5 years ago

          Candela, it’s just not expected when it involves a big market club. Boston has not turned down his demand. He refuses to make one and no this has not to my knowledge happened before to Boston, LA, NY, etc.

          Reply
    • snotrocket

      5 years ago

      Why would you want to decimate the return for Betts by attaching Price?

      Reply
  4. hiflew

    5 years ago

    “doing so could displease the 20-year-old and would likely receive pushback from his representatives.” Since when do organizations really care about the hurt feelings of 20 year old players or his representatives? I could see an established star having this issue, but Tatis has not even logged an entire season yet. Definitely not enough time for “diva attitudes.”

    1
    Reply
    • adamontheshore

      5 years ago

      When you want to possibly sign a young potential superstar to a long-term contract it matters a lot. But, I’m just repeating what the article stated.

      4
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        5 years ago

        $$$ is what will get him to consider signing long term. Imagine if they sent him back to the minors until the team was ready to win. Now that would get him and his management team mad.

        Reply
        • Cam

          5 years ago

          And it would have the Padres facing a clear cut grievance – so what’s your point?

          1
          Reply
        • nymetsking

          5 years ago

          Other teams have $$$ too. If he’s ticked off and wants to leave, he’ll easily find long term offers elsewhere once he hits FA.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          5 years ago

          If they for example got Lindor and wanted him to learn a new position, they have every right to send him down. if he has a slump in the field or at the plate, they’d have that right. Look at Clint Frazier. His bat was and is MLB ready. just an example.

          Reply
      • Jesse Cook

        5 years ago

        If Tatis is a team player,he will do whatever the Padres ask him to do.

        1
        Reply
  5. Dbird777

    5 years ago

    Are the Tribe going to make the same mistake on Lindor as they did Kluber in asking too much now and selling low later? It’s starting to look like it.

    3
    Reply
    • sufferforsnakes

      5 years ago

      (insert face palm here)

      2
      Reply
      • Avory

        5 years ago

        You can’t make this stuff up, can you, sufferer?

        1
        Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Oh, I so hope they do – to the Yankees…. but, I’d also like to be a billionaire, and I think one is just as likely as the other.

          Reply
    • TribeFan4Ever

      5 years ago

      After seeing Kluber go down in early May and watching the Tribe’s young pitchers step up to the challenge, Tribe management knew that Kluber was an expensive piece they really don’t need..

      Reply
  6. 99socalfrc

    5 years ago

    That the Padres front office would even consider moving Tatis Jr is such a joke. He won’t sign an extension with this side show outfit, write it down now.

    Reply
  7. Prunella Vulgaris

    5 years ago

    I wonder about Tatis at shortstop. He’s only 20 years old, and already he’s missed time with a bad back. Not a good sign. Perhaps an outfield spot would be better for him — not as much bending.

    2
    Reply
    • 99socalfrc

      5 years ago

      Have you watched him play shortstop??? My guess (since you are suggesting he play OF) is no.

      He dominates any game he participates in, in a way nothing short of SS will suit him. If he outgrows it fine, but moving him to make room for someone else is like asking Michael Jordan to play second fiddle.

      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        5 years ago

        No it’s not. Maybe an established MJ but not him in after one year in the league.

        Reply
      • Priggs89

        5 years ago

        The stats really do not agree with you. He’s more flash than substance at short.

        Reply
        • padreforlife

          5 years ago

          Bingo

          Reply
      • padreforlife

        5 years ago

        18 errors in 1/2 season is dominating lol

        2
        Reply
      • ck99

        5 years ago

        That’s a very good point Prunella. He is a spectacular at shortstop. Players like him fill seats at the ballpark. But if playing like that puts him on the DL half the season when he’s 20, it may be smarter to put him in the outfield and keep his bat in the lineup.

        He’d still be a great center fielder.

        Reply
  8. Jeff Zanghi

    5 years ago

    If the Sox can unload all of Betts contract and get a package back from LAD including Seager why aren’t they moving on that opportunity. Even if they turn around and flip Seager he’d obviously be easier to trade given his contract or they could shift him to 2B — and thats assuming he’s only part of the return they’d get for Betts. I really don’t get what the Sox position is – like if they have no chance to resign him AND need to get below the luxury tax # why wouldn’t they be interested in a deal like this and get this out of the way now so they could have time to actually build out the rest of their roster before it’s too late.

    1
    Reply
    • Appalachian_Outlaw

      5 years ago

      I’m not disagreeing with you, but I think they’re holding on Betts, hoping someone takes Price, and they can extend Mookie. I don’t believe they move Price though unless they eat some money (counter-productive) or attach a young piece with upside though.

      Reply
      • rocky7

        5 years ago

        Betts doesn’t have a current contract other than the Arb 1 year deal he was on this year for big money and the Arb deal he will be on this coming year….again, he has no official “contract” other than his arbitration salary he is awarded which is the Sox problem….and he has said again and again, he WILL test free agency in 2021 so a team trading for him runs the risk that their offer will not keep him in that teams uniform.
        Moving Price will take lots of “money eating” on the Red Sox part……nobody, even Blooms friends will be rushing forward on a re-boot deal like in the past, to help out the Sox with their bad contracts….its all on them.

        Reply
        • san888

          5 years ago

          It will all work itself out. Not the end of the world. Sox will be more than competitive. These players are at times delusional.

          Reply
    • fits65

      5 years ago

      Hey Jeff,

      Don’t get excited too quickly. The dodgers are not willing to pay the PRICE to get Betts for one year.

      No team wants to take on really stupid contracts. So PRICE and $ale have to stay in Fenway while the Sox desperately try to trade arguably the most talented player in their history (without the junk).

      Reply
      • Cooperdooper7

        5 years ago

        I know it is an “if” …. but If Sale is healthy—- his contract actually is not that terrible… comparable to say Strasburg (who has more injury history) it is actually under market value. Price’s contract is the problem.

        Reply
    • Cooperdooper7

      5 years ago

      Unload Betts Contract? Please know what the heck you are even talking about before replying….. He is on his last year of Arbitration and will most likely receive around 26 to 28 mill for this year. Unloading Price solves most of the Sox issues as far as payroll. The Sox want to Keep Betts— thats why he has not been traded.

      Reply
      • theredsoxrule

        5 years ago

        why would they want to keep Betts when he won’t be worth the money he will get for his next contract…i don’t want them to sign Betts long term it makes better business sense to trade him now for whatever they can get

        Reply
  9. jasonlamarche

    5 years ago

    Put this article in as irrelevant as the “Padres making a move for Strasburg” article

    2
    Reply
  10. jasonlamarche

    5 years ago

    Remember when they were posting article about the Padres making moves for Strasburg, Thor, Kluber, Stro etc haha yeah me too.

    2
    Reply
    • Deleted Userrr

      5 years ago

      Pepperidge Farm remembers

      3
      Reply
  11. Deleted Userrr

    5 years ago

    You’d think they have learned with Wil Myers (and to an extent Luis Urias) what happens when you keep jerking a guy around the diamond. But I guess some people are just incapable of learning from their mistakes. Also, If Preller overpays for one of those guys just to keep him from the Dodgers, he needs to go.

    … not that he didn’t already need to go.

    Reply
    • AtlSoxFan

      5 years ago

      Or you could just accept that myers just isn’t that good.

      The guy did well in about a half season as a rookie. Once guys adjusted to him he became roughly league average. Myers 2nd season in TB looked… Basically exactly the way he’s looked in his entire time in SD.

      Preller and Co have made their share of mistakes. “Damaging” wil myers isn’t one of them.

      1
      Reply
      • Deleted Userrr

        5 years ago

        I know he’s not good. But I do think he would do better if they had him play just one position.

        Reply
        • AtlSoxFan

          5 years ago

          But based on what?

          The problem is, before getting bounced around positions he played exactly the same talent level as he has since.

          I’d say, if anything, moving him around was an attempt after all else failed to find a way to unlock some thing resembling that first rookie half-year like performance. (Of course not having been with coaching staff to know what they did try with him thays pure speculation, but not much worse than blaming the moving around for holding him back.)

          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          5 years ago

          In 2016 when he was an All Star they put him at 1st base and then left him there.

          Reply
    • csspackler

      5 years ago

      Urias played 2B and SS for four years in the minors. Even played 3B.

      Reply
  12. differentbears

    5 years ago

    I really don’t like the idea of moving Seager, but doing so to get Betts makes more sense than Lindor. If it were just Seager for Lindor straightup, IMO, that be only a slight upgrade, but you do it from LA’s perspective. But once you start tossing in possible prospects, especially names that already have shown their promise at the MLB level, it becomes an expensive way to slightly improve at SS.

    It wasn’t that long ago that Seager was untouchable, and his woes were due to a seemingly now resolved injury. He really came alive in the second half, albeit his power was down. I expect a few more of those many doubles to be HRs in 2020.

    Betts makes a bit more sense to dangle Seager plus prospects, especially if they think they can extend him. The difference as hitters between Seager and Betts is greater, and Lux shifts to SS.

    Reply
    • The Human Rain Delay

      5 years ago

      Lindor is country miles ahead of Seager and Im a diehard Dodger fan, crazy talk…its not even close-

      4
      Reply
      • differentbears

        5 years ago

        I don’t see it that way. Corey Seager has a higher BA, higher OBP, same slugging, higher OPS. The ISO numbers are nearly identical, as are the HR/AB rate. Lindor has a speed advantage, and is a better defender, but his bat somehow isn’t better despite spending 81 games in a superior hitters park. Lindor switch hits, but Seager hits lefties better for his career than righties (.325 vs. .281, OPS .916 vs. .826).

        Coming off an injury, Seager put up 4.7 WAR in 134 games (3.3 O, 1.4 D). Lindor in 143 games, 5.4 (3.7, 1.7).

        How is Lindor “country miles ahead” of Seager?

        1
        Reply
      • fox471 Dave

        5 years ago

        Jd, my dear friend. Lindor is not country miles ahead of Seager. Seager was injured in 2018 and 2019 was a comeback year. Stop pretending you are a diehard Dodger fan, troll.

        2
        Reply
      • amk3510

        5 years ago

        They put up similar offense every year but sure feed narratives.

        1
        Reply
  13. emac22

    5 years ago

    Why are the Yankees always alleged to be so desperate for another DH?

    Just because they finally got the number one starter they’ve been avoiding doesn’t mean they should turn around and cancel out the advantage by adding a 3rd or 4th dh to the picture.

    Keep DJ at first base and keep schwarber in Chicago.

    Reply
    • PinstripedPride

      5 years ago

      Voit is at 1B and LeMahieu will return to his most used position of 2B while Gleyber slides over to SS. The club has all but officially said it

      Reply
  14. The Human Rain Delay

    5 years ago

    3 Team propsal

    La- Mookie Price little cash from Sox
    Chi White Sox- Seager Joc
    Red Sox- Prospects and cheap mlb ready players from both teams ( They get under lux tax and get 4/5 mlb near ready talents

    Chi sox offence would look very interesting next day,they have prospects to deal if they choose
    Fried loves Price, Lad just got a close up…..lux may prolly stay; maybe they kick over Jonisiah Gray or Stripling with Jeter Downs on thier side to Red sox
    Sox- Get payed on Mookie and money relief

    Reply
    • ChiSoxCity

      5 years ago

      Dream on, Saux fan. Nobody’s giving you top prospects and “cheap” MLB ready players for Price and a Mookie rental. The entire baseball world is aware about the Saux’s financial situation, and have zero interest in being fleeced to bail them out. Be more reasonable and take what both players are worth right now (not much).

      Reply
      • TrueOutcomeFan

        5 years ago

        How do you talk so much with knowing so little?

        Reply
  15. bostonbob

    5 years ago

    Bloom and Freedman have a great relationship. Sox want to trade a pitcher and with Betts gone nxt off season, the possibility exists of a trade for both, one or nine. If they want to get something done…IT WILL HAPPEN.

    Reply
    • bostonbob

      5 years ago

      Err, none.

      Reply
  16. Matt Tobin

    5 years ago

    I mean Urias was the obvious piece to be the centerpiece of a Lindor trade….but here we are.

    Maybe Pham, Mejia, and Cleveland’s choice of Trammell or Patino could get it done. It is a return that does decimate the team in 2020

    Reply
    • Deleted Userrr

      5 years ago

      Cleveland would have no interest in getting Pham as part of the return for Lindor.

      Reply
  17. jekporkins

    5 years ago

    I could see L.A. and Boston getting together and doing a big trade involving Price and Betts. They have done it before. L.A. needs another starter and for some reason wants Betts. Boston wants serious salary relief.

    Reply
  18. iRiE-G

    5 years ago

    I think the padres should make a run at mookie and price.

    Reply
    • jekporkins

      5 years ago

      I agree but San Diego sounds like they have hit their budget limit. Taking on $50 million in salary for 2020 would be a hard sell.

      1
      Reply
  19. Priggs89

    5 years ago

    It’ll take at least Torres and Severino to get Schwarber. Probably add 2 prospects on top of that. Dude is Babe fricken Ruth.

    Reply
    • babybears

      5 years ago

      You try too hard

      Reply
      • Priggs89

        5 years ago

        Really didn’t have to try at all. It’s too easy.

        Reply
    • ctguy

      5 years ago

      That is the most ridiculous proposal ever. It would take a lot more than Schwarber to get Torres.

      Reply
      • Priggs89

        5 years ago

        You clearly don’t read many Cubs rumors.

        Reply
        • ctguy

          5 years ago

          You clearly are delusional if you think the Yankees would consider Gleyber Torres in a trade for Schwarber.

          Reply
    • Just_a_thought

      5 years ago

      I think these 2 would be enough if the Yankees sign Torres to a huge extension first and then trade him, while paying his entire salary. That’s the only way the cubs move him.

      Reply
    • wordonthestreet

      5 years ago

      Torres is more valuable than Schwarber alone

      Reply
  20. canadianyankee

    5 years ago

    Here’s my trade proposal to Cleveland…Garcia, Estrada, Florial, Happ (while taking $7M of his contract) and either Loaisiga or Tarpley for Lindor….thoughts?

    Reply
    • Just_a_thought

      5 years ago

      I’m just focusing on Happ… 1. Why would Cleveland take him? 2. Even at $7M, what if his option vests? 3. Regardless, Cleveland taking on any of his salary, while reducing payroll does not make sense. Even taking out Happ, for this return, Cleveland would likely be coming up short for Lindor. Maybe if the Yankees take on Santana’s remaining salary would Cleveland consider this underwhelming return.

      Reply
      • Boogaloo

        5 years ago

        Underwhelming? I mean he did put 3 guys who were recently or are top 100 prospects and almost solid young player.

        What were you asking for Kluber and what did you end up getting?

        Reply
      • canadianyankee

        5 years ago

        Thanks for the civil reply…I have to disagree tho…do you really think the 2 of the top 3 prospects are underwhelming? Both ranked 62 and 82 in all mlb…sure Happ’s contract likely isn’t appealing…so take Happ out and replace him with Tarpley and Loaisiga? Plenty of young controllable talent for one player…not likely the Yanks make this move but it’d be nice to see Lindor in pinstripes…worth betting the farm on him

        Reply
    • hockeyjohn

      5 years ago

      Happ and spare parts for Lindor. My thoughts are you need to take off your Yankee glasses and realize what an awful proposal that is.

      Reply
  21. hoosierhysteria

    5 years ago

    Garbage news. Tali’s not going to CF

    Reply
  22. OCTraveler

    5 years ago

    Dodgers need to make a deal with the Indians for Lindor that might be in the line of Pedersen, Muncy and a pitcher. Dodgers then slide Seager over to third, a position better suiting his range and go with this infield: Turner – first, Lux – second, Seager – third and Lindor – short.

    Reply
  23. wrongway2011

    5 years ago

    Betts and Bradley to the Mets for Syndergard and Conforto. Red Sox get 2 years control of top line SP for about $10M/year and good corner OF for 2 years. Mets get one year of superstar big name player, MVP candidate, exclusive negotiating rights for one year and draft pick compensation if he leaves. Plus a Gold Glove CF who should hit better in the NL.

    Price to Dodgers for AJ Pollock. Price is owed $96M for 3 years. Pollock is owed $46M for 3 years and is redundant for the Dodgers. Net cost to Dodgers is $50M/3 years, or less than $17M per year. Dodgers get a front line SP at a reasonable net cost. Red Sox get viable starting OF.

    Red Sox dump $32M (Price), $28M (Betts) and $11M (Bradley). Total $71M.

    They bring back Syndergard $10M, Conforto $4M and Pollock $16M. Total $30M.

    They save $41M which brings them $15M below the $208M threshold and allows them to sign Keuchel or Teheran to further bolster their SP, plus some extra $ to fill any other needs or have flexibility. Easy Peasy!

    Reply
    • OCTraveler

      5 years ago

      Dodger fan who wouldn’t mind the Pollock for Price deal but would also like to get Betts as well – Dodgers have a surplus of catchers (Ruiz, Smith, Barnes), a surplus of young arms (May, Stripling) and a surplus of infielders (Muncy, Seager, Taylor) – add any two of these and work something out

      Reply
  24. yogineely

    5 years ago

    Lol to everyone who thinks half a season of tatis is more valuable than a top 10 player who’s established already.

    Reply
    • TheMick7

      5 years ago

      Yogineely,

      Why did you say my statement concurring with that made no sense then? If you were not referring to me, I sincerely apologize for misinterpreting your response.

      Reply
    • Deleted Userrr

      5 years ago

      Tatis has 5 years left. And realistically should have 6.

      Reply
  25. TheMick7

    5 years ago

    For all those illiterates that can’t seem to grasp my comment earlier and continue insulting, rather than having a conversation, I will restate my assertion:

    Indians would demand Gore or Tatis plus prospects before they trade Lindor.

    Indians would be asking way too much because of the value of Gore and Tatis.

    Hence, the trade won’t happen because Indians won’t accept less and Padres will not make that trade. Let the insults keep flying you perfidious children, but I haven’t even warmed up yet. So, mental midgets, if you disagree with that, fine, but stop taking statements out of context and then insulting your own hypothetical transaction proposal, because that, self-indulgent ignoramuses, is truly idiotic.

    Reply
    • OCTraveler

      5 years ago

      Just because you think you’re brilliant, no reason to condemn others … besides, your thought process lacks any imagine necessary to be considered original

      Reply
      • TheMick7

        5 years ago

        Here we go…. I was called stupid multiple times for making a valid assertion. Then I responded only to be insulted again; so yes, when repeatedly challenged by people, like you, who don’t read, get facts, or understand context, then write a response opining on said topic, I will smash your perfidious comments and subpar IQ.

        I will show respect first and always, until insults fly for no reason. Then, like with you, I will demonstrate how idiotic and inaccurate your statement was. Please feel free to read, study, or get a peer review if you would like to have an adult conversation.

        Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          OCTraveler: And what does your last statement even mean? It’s incoherent. My “thought process lacks any imagine to be considered original?” I posited the trade would not go through and was insulted, so I insulted in return, which I don’t believe has anything to do with you. I was only speaking to those individuals partaking in the insults, so you should not take offense. But, if you do, please have something better than my statement is not original, Mr. Uber Intelligence. Unless, of course, you are a bandwagon bully, which is plausible also.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          OCTraveler: So….. nothing again, from another illustrious author? Then stop insulting people and just have a regular conversation.

          Reply
        • Boogaloo

          5 years ago

          Just curious, what did you think they would demand for kluber before trading him?

          Im guessing alot more than they got.

          Lindor is a great player, but hes basically on a 2 year- 34-38 million contract.

          He loses value the longer he’s held onto, teams don’t give up great prospects for guys already deep into arbitration, at least not many do.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Yes, you are correct, but my opinion is that the Indians will demand either Gore or Tatis to give up Lindor. I don’t think the trade will happen because of that.

          With Kluber I was surprised, like many, that they gave up so little, comparatively. Same goes for Lindor – in fact, I would love it if they asked less because I think it would give the Yankees a shot, however minimal, at trading for him. I don’t believe this trade will ever come to fruition, unless the Indians take the same approach with Lindor as the did with Kluber, I just don’t see it happening.

          Again, I’m not making a value judgement, just stating what in think the Indians will demand this year. And thank you for posting your question without insults attached like many on this forum.

          What do you think they will ask the Padres for him?

          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          5 years ago

          Well they have the leverage of “We’re actually trying to contend in 2020 so it will have to be a really good return to give up the most important piece to that equation.” Fairly certain they’d demand Gore as the centerpiece.

          But the Padres obviously aren’t going to move MacKenzie Gore for any 2-year rentals. Nor should they.

          Reply
        • TheMick7

          5 years ago

          Totally agree. Upvote for you, sir. Good point.

          Reply
  26. BPax

    5 years ago

    I see why these are called “trade rumors.” They float them out there and shoot them down at the same time! I’m starting my own rumors right now. “Every major league team is interested in acquiring Mike Trout if the Angels will pay most of his salary” reports BPax on Trade Rumors. “The Angels likely won’t entertain offers in this scenario.” “Orioles interested in trading Chris Davis for Khris Davis” according to BPax. “That way we’d both have a Chris/Khris Davis that strikes out a lot” according to an Oriole spokesman that asked to not be named.

    Reply
  27. sufferforsnakes

    5 years ago

    Like the sun rising every morning
    are the bizarre trade proposals on MLBTR.

    Reply
  28. drysdale53

    5 years ago

    This is the same bs/tease Freidman and Company put out every off season. “Interested in big names,” and then doing NOTHING until Trade Deadline if then. They will give the fans the likes of Pollack, Kelly and now Treinan and nothing more. Having Lindor or Betts would be great, but unless they can pitch as well as hit, then it ain’t gonna fix anything!

    Reply
  29. bigbadjohnny

    5 years ago

    Schwarber would be a Yankee Killer for the Red Sox in their ballpark !

    Reply
    • TheMick7

      5 years ago

      He could do some damage with that swing, for sure.

      Reply
  30. Nugent'sBow

    5 years ago

    My taint itches a little bit.

    Reply
  31. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    5 years ago

    And the Yankees still dont have the prospects the Cubs want or need. Unless they get Torres plus another prospect.

    Reply
    • paindonthurt

      5 years ago

      Lol. Not getting Torres for Schwarber.

      Reply
  32. tommyl

    5 years ago

    Preliminary and exploratory. Sounds like Freidman.

    Reply
    • The Human Toilet

      5 years ago

      The Dude does not have the balls to pull a major trade or sign a major free agent, he needs to go back to running a small market team where he belongs.

      Reply
      • Jim Emmons

        5 years ago

        Dear I hate my father (nice name)
        Friedman made a competitive offer for Gerrit Cole and was never given a chance to counter NY’s offer. It is unlikely that LA would have outbid the Yankees regardless. It looks like Cole had decided to be a Yankee. Rendon? What do you do when a player has a silly notion in his head about your team, but then signs with the ‘other’ Los Angeles team? I can’t think of any Dodger who lives the ‘Hollywood’ lifestyle now that Puig is gone and he was settling down as a Dad. Strasberg wanted to stay in DC. You can’t blame Friedman for all this or nor being unwilling to overpay for a player.

        Reply
    • Jim Emmons

      5 years ago

      No, it doesn’t sound like him at all. Friedman doesn’t make sounds, he works completely in silence and every rumor we read is just that and certainly doesn’t come from him.

      Reply
  33. paindonthurt

    5 years ago

    People actually believe the Pads would trade Tatis Jr. in any trade?

    Reply
  34. Matt 18

    5 years ago

    What if the Padres set up a package for Marte and Archer for Myers plus prospects and money like maybe Morejon, Ona, and Quantrill

    Reply
    • Deleted Userrr

      5 years ago

      That’s not enough to get Pittsburgh to take Myers without including Marte and Archer.

      Reply
      • Matt 18

        5 years ago

        It’s a start I think I dont want archer but I dont want Myers more

        Reply
  35. megaj

    5 years ago

    Of course Yankees fans would drool over this. Hopefully Epstein isn’t so stupid as to trade away Schwarber. Not only fan favorite, but a true team player that may not have hit his best seasons yet.

    Reply
    • paindonthurt

      5 years ago

      He would not be stupid to trade Schwarber if you receive more value in multiple players. I don’t think he is the one they trade however. Bryant has the the most dollars attached and should net some of the young pitching they need.

      Reply
  36. raulito23

    5 years ago

    I think ya kees dong need kyle.They hace similar players thanos Andujar whole can be moved ti outfielder,or Frazier who hace bad defensive but good bat similar kyle.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death

Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List

Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros

Evan Longoria To Sign One-Day Contract, Retire As Member Of Rays

Diamondbacks To Promote Jordan Lawlar

Rockies Fire Bud Black

Cubs Promote Cade Horton

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

Ross Stripling Retires

Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death

Phillies Sign Seth Beer To Minor League Deal

Guardians Place Ben Lively On Injured List With Flexor Strain

Dodgers Place Roki Sasaki On Injured List

Jordan Luplow Signs With Atlantic League’s High Point Rockers

Dodgers To Activate Clayton Kershaw On Saturday

Yankees Sign Anthony DeSclafani To Minor League Deal

Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List

Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros

Jake Bloss To Undergo UCL Surgery

ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
  • Nolan Arenado Rumors
  • Dylan Cease Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Marcus Stroman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
  • 2025 Arbitration Projections
  • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

ad: 160x600_MLB

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version