Headlines

  • Jackson Jobe To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Shane McClanahan Pauses Rehab, Seeking Further Opinions On Nerve Issue
  • Red Sox To Acquire Jorge Alcala
  • Royals Place Cole Ragans On IL With Rotator Cuff Strain
  • Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Mets Notes: Arenado, Thor, Flowers, Rosario

By Connor Byrne | December 17, 2020 at 8:26am CDT

The Rockies “want to engage with” the Mets regarding third baseman Nolan Arenado, according to Jon Morosi of MLB Network (via Danny Abriano of SNY). It’s unclear whether the Mets have interest in Arenado, but team president Sandy Alderson told WFAN on Wednesday that he “expects to be involved” in the trade market for players with large contracts and those with one year of control left, Tim Healey of Newsday tweets. Arenado’s contract certainly counts as “large,” as he’s owed $199MM over the next six years. The five-time All-Star will have a chance to opt out of his deal after next season, but that seems even less likely than before when considering the economic uncertainty across the league.

More from Queens…

  • Right-hander Noah Syndergaard is “on schedule or maybe a little bit ahead of schedule” in his recovery from late-March Tommy John surgery, manager Luis Rojas told reporters (per Mike Puma of the New York Post). Meanwhile, Alderson revealed on WFAN that it’s “reasonable” to expect Syndergaard to return to the majors in June. With Syndergaard shelved, the Mets are slated to begin next year with Jacob deGrom, Marcus Stroman and David Peterson as their top three starters, but it wouldn’t be a surprise to see the team add to its rotation before then.
  • Before they signed catcher James McCann to a four-year, $40.6MM contract, the Mets had interest in fellow backstop Tyler Flowers, Healey reports. He would have been a fallback option had the Mets missed out on McCann. While the 34-year-old Flowers has a longer track record of success than McCann, 30, the latter has been the better player over the past couple seasons. Flowers, who spent the previous five years with the division-rival Braves, is coming off a year in which he hit .217/.325/.348 with one home run and a bloated 42.5 percent strikeout rate in 80 plate appearances. He backed up ex-Met Travis d’Arnaud in 2020.
  • Amed Rosario has made 387 of his career 388 appearances at shortstop, though he’ll begin to receive reps at third base, Rojas stated (via Anthony DiComo of MLB.com). However, Rosario will not get any time in the outfield. “That’s something that he’s not doing, and we’re not planning on doing right now with him,” Rojas said. While Rosario’s still just 25, the former star prospect hasn’t lived up to the hype in the majors so far. He posted an uninspiring .252/.272/.371 line with four homers and a measly 2.7 percent walk rate last season, during which he lost playing time to Andres Gimenez. Barring an offseason acquisition at short, Gimenez looks like the front-runner to start for the club in 2021.
Share 0 Retweet 5 Send via email0

Colorado Rockies New York Mets Notes

Zaidi On Giants’ Pitching Plans
Main
Offseason Outlook: New York Mets
View Comments (178)
Post a Comment

178 Comments

  1. MetsFan22

    4 years ago

    Arenado would be nice because we wouldn’t have to give up that much.

    1
    Reply
    • Bill M

      4 years ago

      OK, I’ll bite. What do ya see the Mets giving up for him?

      Reply
      • MetsFan22

        4 years ago

        Jd Davis
        +

        Not
        Alvarez
        Allen
        PCA
        Mauricio
        Nimmo

        We are taking a huge contract of their hands

        Reply
        • MetsFan2021

          4 years ago

          As a Met fan, I am going to tell you right now that Arenado will not be that easy to acquire. He is a player that brings fans to Colorado. We are going to have to do more than just JD to get the deal done and the prospects need to be solid.

          11
          Reply
        • colonthegoat40

          4 years ago

          That might even be more, I’m guessing a bigger contract like Familia, along with Nimmo/JD Davis and Brett Baty

          Reply
        • MetsFan2021

          4 years ago

          Id do Familia Davis and Baty for Arenado.

          1
          Reply
        • MetsFan22

          4 years ago

          They basically want us to engage with them. They are desperate to get rid of the contract. We aren’t going to have to give any legit piece we have if we take 100% of the contract. Now if they are willing to take Cano?? Then that’s a different story.

          3
          Reply
        • MetsFan22

          4 years ago

          I’d do that too. Since they are taking familia back

          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          No on Arenado. That contract is gonna anchor efforts to improve the team for a long time.

          7
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          Trading Nimmo to obtain Arenado subtracts too much before adding. Not worth it. And that contract? Oof!

          6
          Reply
        • mcmillankmm

          4 years ago

          I don’t see the Rockies wanting Cano…Familia possibly though, seems like Colorado is always hurting for bullpen arms

          1
          Reply
        • hyraxwithaflamethrower

          4 years ago

          Colorado is hurting more for financial flexibility, which is the better reason for them to want Familia.

          Reply
        • dopt

          4 years ago

          Baty will rake in Colorado

          Reply
        • Ma4170

          4 years ago

          I’d think it would have to be familia cano davis baty… that essentially makes arenado’s remaining contract 23m, 9m, 9m, then 33m for last three years… big risk for a guy where you’d have to pay 33m a year for his declining years… though we desperately need his defense

          1
          Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          so if both the team abd Arenado want him gone so badly then why hasnt a deal been made already? i think youre overestimating how much they want that contract gone (which in and of itself is hardly a burden)

          3
          Reply
        • jallopy

          4 years ago

          Mets will not deplete top farm talent. I highly doubt they would trade Baty

          Reply
        • VonPurpleHayes

          4 years ago

          I agree. The Mets don’t need to be “in” on every player around. Especially when they have a number of extensions to worry about next year. Arenado is a big name, but I honestly don’t think he improves the Mets all that much. A big upgrade defensively, but they already have 3rd basemen who can hit. They need pitching. They need a center fielder. And they can afford to upgrade at SS.

          Reply
        • reflect

          4 years ago

          Ok then let them keep him. We can throw 33 million dollars at someone else without giving up prospects at all

          4
          Reply
        • mookiesboy

          4 years ago

          Cano isn’t a player anymore. He’s just a contract So to make it all work financially he certainly could be part of the deal

          3
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          Exactly. If we’re gonna spend, just spend in free agency

          1
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          Its not a matter of wanting Cano, its a matter of taking the one remaining year of Cano in order to jettison the Arenado do contract.

          Reply
        • vtadave

          4 years ago

          Cano is signed through 2023.

          Reply
        • Stevil

          4 years ago

          For the right to pay a player entering his 30’s for 6 more years and nearly 200 million?

          Colorado doesn’t even seem to like prospects. They’ve snubbed a number of their own prospects in favor of veterans with no defensive value.

          Reply
        • alproof

          4 years ago

          CAN’T trade Baty Allan Alvarez Mauricio. Have already thrown away the previous best prospects. Arenado is the ultimate Coors Field hitter; ordinary otherwise. DON’T trade those four players for anyone (they will—I don’t trust Alderson at all).

          Reply
        • deadspy3 2

          4 years ago

          Can it, dinosaur

          Reply
        • VonPurpleHayes

          4 years ago

          Big difference between engaging with and desperate. Cohen has deep pockets. Teams know that, and are looking to offload bad contracts.

          1
          Reply
        • ek_roy_92

          4 years ago

          I read yesterday that Colorado would seek a package headlined by Nimmo.

          1
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          Then pass. I’d rather have Nimmo than Arenado and that ball & chain of a contract

          1
          Reply
        • carlos15

          4 years ago

          Like taking $200m off their hands? That should be enough.

          1
          Reply
        • Dutch Vander Linde

          4 years ago

          If they want to engage the Mets, that means there’s a player on the Mets that interests them and want to see if the Mets would give it to them in a trade.

          Reply
        • Kapostatuz

          4 years ago

          Rockies sounding desperate, they took a big hit money wise just like every other club and on top of that I’m sure they want to extend Trevor story

          Reply
        • iamhector24

          4 years ago

          Spoken like someone who still thinks the Wilpons own the team.

          Reply
        • marcfrombrooklyn

          4 years ago

          Evan Longoria 2.0,.at twice the salary.

          Reply
        • PoloGrounds62

          4 years ago

          Like Rosario and a top prospect. Throw in Cano and it’s a deal

          Reply
        • metsfan1992

          4 years ago

          Well they could probably send a good package to Colorado for not that much, I mean Sandy Alderson could probably just get washed up guys for the minors for now just so we have some pieces, it is nice to see the Coupons are gone!

          Reply
        • metslvt17

          4 years ago

          It’s a burden when they have to let Story walk.

          Reply
        • larry48

          4 years ago

          you do know that Arenado has a no-trade clause in his contract and he can opt-out after the 2021 season. Who is going to pay Arenado to waive his no-trade clause and then pay him to not opt-out? Sounds like more years and more dollars.

          Reply
        • PitcherMeRolling

          4 years ago

          Assuming the Rockies aren’t going to pick up a significant portion of Arenado’s contract or take a contract like Cano/Familia back, he shouldn’t cost more than a piece like Davis and one or two top 30 (organizational) prospects.

          Arenado’s contract is awful and the chances of him opting out aren’t good. The Rockies suck with Arenado, they can suck without him.

          Also, if he brought that many fans to the park, they wouldn’t be trying to trade him.

          Reply
      • bklynny67

        4 years ago

        JD Davis and Dom Smith. No one else is going to offer a young controllable player who is already having MLB success that’s better than Dom.

        Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          Please don’t trade Smith for Arenado, that would be awful for the Mets. Trade a young, cheap, potential star for a great player on the wrong side of 30 owed 200 million. No thanks.

          10
          Reply
        • Ma4170

          4 years ago

          Dom Smith may be the best hitter on the Mets… if they trade him at all, that would be a huge mistake

          7
          Reply
        • matteste187

          4 years ago

          That’s a BVW move bro. Besides mcniel, I’m almost trading dom for NO ONE. I would offer JD, vientos, wolf and cano (saves 15M for the first 3 years than 33 the next 3 years after that).

          1
          Reply
      • FredMcGriff for the HOF

        4 years ago

        I would imagine it wouldn’t take much beyond salary. That’s a big chunk of $$$. I don’t think anyone wants Cano at this point due to his numerous PED links. I think the Mets are stuck with his contract.

        1
        Reply
      • Chuck O

        4 years ago

        Davis, Familia, Cano and Baty

        Reply
        • PoloGrounds62

          4 years ago

          No way Baty should be traded.

          1
          Reply
    • mcmillankmm

      4 years ago

      For sure, if Mets assume 100% of remaining salary I can’t imagine they would have to deal their top prospects

      Reply
    • pal88

      4 years ago

      CANO must be included in whatever deal is made

      1
      Reply
      • hyraxwithaflamethrower

        4 years ago

        If Cano is included, the rest of the package has to be more appealing. Effectively, you can think of it as Arenado’s $199M – Cano’s $72M = $127M for six years of Arenado at the cost of 2 years of Cano. That’s more worth it than just taking on Arenado’s contract as is.

        1
        Reply
        • KamKid

          4 years ago

          Don’t the Mets only owe Cano $40.5m with his suspension this year and Seattle retaining some of it? That probably evens up the value somewhat. Plus Cano’s suspension is 162 games, not one season. If ’21 is shortened and there is a labor stoppage in ’22, the Mets (or Rockies) get out of even more money. I’d take that bet if I was Colorado and able to get some actual talent back for Arenado while getting out of the Arenado commitment.

          Reply
      • RunDMC

        4 years ago

        With Cano’s 2 suspensions (80-games in 2018; all of 2021 season) which resulted in him forfeiting his salary during said time – he’s forfeited a total of $35.8 million…!

        Yes, he can afford to do it – I guess – but dang. That’s a whole lotta cash.

        4
        Reply
        • Freddie Morales

          4 years ago

          It’s actually closer to 48 million because he forfeits his salary this year. No reason it can’t be Cano, Familia, Nimmo, and Baty for Arenado

          1
          Reply
        • RunDMC

          4 years ago

          I factored that in. (2018) 80-game suspension: $11.741 + $24 (2021)
          Am I missing another suspension or is my math off?

          Reply
        • mcmillankmm

          4 years ago

          I think Freddie is referring to the remaining money owed to Cano….which is $48M for 2022 and 2023, but I believe Seattle will be paying $3.75M to Cano in each of those seasons.

          Reply
      • mcmillankmm

        4 years ago

        Pal88, if Cano must be included, I would also expect to include the Mets top overall prospect

        1
        Reply
        • NMK 2

          4 years ago

          No, they don’t. Arenado has an albatross of a contract remaining for six years. Even if New York sent over Cano, we’d still be saving you cash.

          If Colorado actually expects talent to help them save money, the Mets can buy up all the current top free agents instead. I’d rather have Bauer and Hendriks than Arenado.

          2
          Reply
      • bush1

        4 years ago

        Cano had a no trade clause. No chance he waives that to go to Colorado.

        Reply
        • NYMets973

          4 years ago

          Why not he went to Seattle and him being on the juice he would rake in coors field lol

          Reply
    • 55bums

      4 years ago

      Remember the no trade clause

      Anybody who wants Arenado will have to convince him they will be more competitive over the next five years in their division than the Dodgers in the NL West
      Otherwise he opts out and signs with the Dodgers (which last year he indicated was his preference being a SoCal guy)
      Clearly the Dodger organization has a better chance than anyone else to be the best in their division and he would increase their odds
      Plus, they can match/better any other organization’s offer to the Rockies

      Reply
      • hyraxwithaflamethrower

        4 years ago

        Unless fans are in the stands for at least 80% of the season, with hopes for no restrictions for 2022, *and* Arenado returns to form, I don’t see him opting out because he won’t get as much on the open market. Rockies overpaid for him.

        2
        Reply
      • wallybackman

        4 years ago

        unless Dodgers get engaged quickly (and I hope they do as I dont want Nolan), its a moot point

        Reply
        • pal88

          4 years ago

          From what I’ve read the Rockies want no part of Nolan in the same division

          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        Otherwise he opts out and signs with the Dodgers
        ——————————————————-
        Why would he opt out? The is no chance he lands the same contract, and likely not close.

        1
        Reply
    • Marty McRae

      4 years ago

      The Baseball Trade Values website says Cano-Arenado straight up works.

      As do the following:

      Arenado+$30M for Familia
      Arenado+$50M for Rosario + Kilome
      Arenado+$70M for Conforto, or for Baty + Szapucki + Rosario

      Just to reiterate, I did not make these up. They came from a generator.

      Reply
      • Tom

        4 years ago

        The Mets would be Wilponly-Foolish to even consider parting with Conforto to get Arenado, no matter how much money the Rockies eat.

        1
        Reply
      • DTDATL

        4 years ago

        That’s a terrible website and should be avoided if they say one for one is a fair deal.

        1
        Reply
    • ohyeadam

      4 years ago

      I think an arenado+Blackmon to Mets deal makes too much sense. Rockies can eat some money for a better return or straight salary dump. No idea what Mets would need to give up but I can’t insist would be anything too excessive

      Reply
      • Cosmo2

        4 years ago

        No thanks. No on Arenado and absolutely do not need Blackmon. We already have 2 great corner OFrs and Blackmon is a butcher in CF

        Reply
    • padam

      4 years ago

      Wouldn’t have to give up much I agree with, but for 6 years…I’d pass. That’s going to suck up a good percentage of $$$ and certainly don’t want a Cano v2. Arenado is a product of Coors field offensively, even though his defense is outstanding. And down the road we will hopefully have Baty. Davis can bridge that for now, or even a Justin Turner for a couple of years if necessary.

      Reply
    • 17dizzy

      4 years ago

      The Cardinals have the players to get Arenaldo. Maybe even enough players to have Colorado eat a large amount of contract due him.

      Reply
      • brodie-bruce

        4 years ago

        i can see a trade like carp cmart and maybe gorman or high end mlb ready arm not named flatery or reyes. prospects going back depends on what contracts col takes back or how much of nolans contract col holds on to. now mind you i’m just spitballing a possible scenario but carp and cmart could use a change to in scenery and yes both of there guys values are low but if we’re taking most of that contract. a trade off of some bad contracts that have just a year or 2 left with a top 10 prospect i feel is a fair deal.

        Reply
  2. ab2804

    4 years ago

    if arenado renounces the termination clause for next year it would be fine

    Reply
    • Cosmo2

      4 years ago

      He’s not opting out of that monster contract. If he does, he’s doing any team that acquires him a favor, and losing money for himself.

      7
      Reply
      • Marty McRae

        4 years ago

        See: Davis, Chris.

        1
        Reply
    • bush1

      4 years ago

      He’s not opting out of that deal. Everyone keeps saying that, but he has zero chance of making more than that again on the market. It’s not even a consideration.

      2
      Reply
  3. VonPurpleHayes

    4 years ago

    Home/road splits are always a little exaggerated. Players tend to hit more at home, no matter where their ballpark is. It’s a comfort thing. That being said, I couldn’t think of more opposite stadiums than Coors and Citi Field; a hitter’s paradise and a pitcher’s paradise. Arenado would certainly be a curious move, but I don’t think the Mets need to make that trade at all. They’re okay at 3rd without taking on that huge contract. I would imagine they’d rather trade for Lindor to upgrade short.

    5
    Reply
  4. 1984wasntamanual

    4 years ago

    If the Mets take on the full contract they shouldn’t have to give up anything of value. His contract is underwater

    4
    Reply
    • whyhayzee

      4 years ago

      1984 was a manual for Google.

      1
      Reply
    • Bill M

      4 years ago

      But as mentioned, if they take on the contract that will handcuff them for future signings. Right now they have excellent value with Davis at third

      2
      Reply
    • I Beg To Differ

      4 years ago

      Animal Farm- an allegorical tale of animals who rebel against humans where they hope to create a society to be free, equal, and happy that ultimately fails when certain animals seeks power by betraying the masses.

      1984- Thematically, Nineteen Eighty-Four centres on the consequences of totalitarianism, mass surveillance, and repressive regimentation of persons and behaviours within society. Almost like a warning of how bad things can get in a society that employs these methods.

      Reply
      • 1984wasntamanual

        4 years ago

        But some animals are more equal than others and know that Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

        Reply
  5. thunder12k

    4 years ago

    Lots of things to consider this offseason. Lots of fans want to use the savings from signing McCann over Realmuto to sign Springer, Bauer & Hendriks/Hand. I’d be thrilled with those options. But remember, next years free agent class includes Correa, Baez, Lindor, Story, Seager, etc. The Mets are connected to every major free agent at the moment but if they spend right up to the luxury tax line this year, it may limit their ability to sign one of these superstars next offseason. I’m a big fan of Arenado and have wanted him as the Mets 3rd baseman for the past few years, but they just have to be careful with how many $100M+ contracts they add. Right now it’s just deGrom. If they add in Springer and Bauer that’s 3. Conforto extension make 4. Trading for Arenado makes 5. Signing one of those major free agents next year makes 6 and so on.

    Cohen and Sandy are both very smart. I’m excited to see how this whole roster shaping plays out over the next 12 months.

    4
    Reply
    • wright1970

      4 years ago

      thunder12k, well said and i totally agree!!

      1
      Reply
    • Cosmo2

      4 years ago

      No Bauer, please. Springer, 2 reliable starters would make me happy.

      2
      Reply
      • thunder12k

        4 years ago

        Which 2 reliable starters do you want to sign. After Bauer, we’re looking at Tanaka and Odorizzi as the next best options. Each have an average ERA over 4 over the past 4 years. Each is going to probably command a 4 year deal in the $50-60M range. Not sure I like that commitment for that kind of hopefully production. Then Stroman and Thor are free agents next year and we start the process over again.

        There is no easy solution for this rotation but Bauer and deGrom creates and absolutely devastating duo at the top of the rotation. I think they would feed off each other the way Harvey, deGrom and Thor seems to do early in their careers when they competed with each other to be the teams ace.

        1
        Reply
        • User 4245925809

          4 years ago

          You forgot the 38yo Happ Thunder, but regardless. I’d take Walker over any of the 3 and he’ll probably end up costing about the same as the 2 u mentioned. Happ I don’t see making that much, unless some GM has totally lost it out there.

          1
          Reply
        • thunder12k

          4 years ago

          But that’s the point, whatever you flavor is for the next best starter, I don’t think any of them are locks to be reliable. And everyone needs starters so will they overpay you get one if they miss out in Bauer? Who knows.

          Reply
        • rct

          4 years ago

          @thunder12k: I think a lot of the commenters here are vastly overrating Bauer and overvaluing his 2020 season, which was 11 total starts.

          He’s only ever had sustained success in one season (2018) and he’s been pretty average for every other season of his career. Further, people have been bestowing ‘Ace’ status on him because of the 11 starts he had in 2020, but what about his final 10 starts of 2019 after he was traded to Cincinnati? He was an utter disaster (over 6 ERA, 73 ERA+, 4.85 FIP).

          Even more: his 2020 seems wildly out of character (.215 BABIP vs career of .296).

          I personally think that whoever signs Bauer will, if it’s a long term deal or they expect a reproduction of 2020, will be sorely disappointed. I would not be surprised if Tanaka has better 2021 stats.

          Reply
        • thunder12k

          4 years ago

          Bauer is a big proponent of analytics and particularly spin rate. Tracking his career, you’ll notice that his spin rate started climbing in 2017 and has been on a sharp incline since leading me to believe that his 2020 success may be more sustainable. Sometimes it just takes these guys a few years to figure out how to “pitch”. Take Max Scherzer for example. In his 6th year (2013 in Detroit), something seemed to click for him and he went from being a useful pitcher to an all-star/cy young contender and he’s maintained that form since. I’d obviously like to see Bauer with a large sample size of deGrom-like consistency but I think pairing him and DeGrom together will give these guys a chance to push each other.

          It could certainly backfire as well. All of the free agents in this class come with risk, especially the top guys with the length and dollar value they are asking for

          Reply
    • whyhayzee

      4 years ago

      At some point the Mets need to MAKE money. Will the fans show up? Will merchandise fly off the shelves? Etc.

      We’ll see.

      2
      Reply
      • metsfanmike804

        4 years ago

        If the team on the field is good, the fans will come.

        Reply
  6. AngelDiceClay

    4 years ago

    If the Mets do aquire him. Its a rental. He will be a Dodger a year later

    1
    Reply
    • MetsFan22

      4 years ago

      No. The Mets will only acquire him or Lindor if they know they could lock him up. If they acquire him he agreed to stay with them. Everyone knows he likes the dodgers. Players like teams all the time. Doesn’t mean they wouldn’t play anywhere else.

      1
      Reply
      • VonPurpleHayes

        4 years ago

        @Metsfan22 The sign-and-extend is not as easy as people make it out to be. Players have confidence in their abilities and want to test free agency. So trading for 1 year of a player is always a gamble even if an extension is talked about.

        1
        Reply
      • Cosmo2

        4 years ago

        Arenado? He is locked up already.

        Reply
        • VonPurpleHayes

          4 years ago

          @Cosmo I was talking about Lindor specifically.

          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          Oh, sorry. I get carried away sometimes.

          Reply
      • AngelDiceClay

        4 years ago

        Metsfan
        As far as Arenado goes. It would be for 1 year. If the Mets think they can convince him to not opt out. That’s a chance they will have to take. But he has said he wants to play for the Dodgers.

        Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          He’s not opting out. He’s not giving up millions to change scenery.

          2
          Reply
        • AngelDiceClay

          4 years ago

          I think he will. He holds all the cards. The Rockies can risk getting nothing. Arenado can play in Colorad 2021 and opt out and sign with the Dodgers.

          1
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          He is really unlikely to opt out. He’ll be 31 when 2022 starts. How much do you think teams will pay for a 31 year old 3B? Even assuming he returns to form, he will likely make less than he is earning now.

          And the Rockies aren’t risking not getting anything for him. They are already not getting anything for him. They can’t trade him without eating salary.

          Reply
        • larry48

          4 years ago

          Arenado has to approve the trade to the Mets and I dought he will waive his no-trade clause. I don’t think he will do anything that the Rockies want they lied to him.

          Reply
    • Cosmo2

      4 years ago

      No way. Dodgers are not that dumb. He’s not gonna be good forever. Why would he walk away from 199 million guaranteed? Why the heck would the Dodgers give him more than that? To pay him 35 million a year for his decline years?

      3
      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      he’s not opting out of that money, just like JD Martinez was never opting out.

      3
      Reply
    • DTDATL

      4 years ago

      Arenado isn’t going to opt out and lose a butt ton of guaranteed money. Whichever team he is with will be his team til the entire contract is up or he gets traded again.

      2
      Reply
  7. wallybackman

    4 years ago

    Nope… If they really want the Mets to be engaged and want to move Nolan, they need to pay down a lot more of that $200 million that he is owed over the next six years and not expect much back. Potentially taking Cano’s contract back back does help with some of that cost, and they would also need for him to waive the opt out after next season. If I am the Mets, I’m not giving or offering any top prospects for him.

    His #s are hugely influenced by playing in COL. as his career BA is 60 points higher at home, SLG is 140 points higher and OBP is 50 points higher. Career OPS on road is under .800, the line to delineate a “good hitter, and his numbers at Citi over his career are worse than almost any other park (.229BA, .275OBP, .410SLG, .684 OBP). No thanks.

    5
    Reply
    • its_happening

      4 years ago

      Underwhelming numbers in Miami, Philly and Atlanta also.

      Reply
  8. bobg529

    4 years ago

    Cano and Nimmo for Arenado, straightforward deal. We take on $199 million contract which they partly offset by taking the last two years of Cano. Nimmo is the only sweetener they get. Who else would take on Arenado’s bloated contract, do they trade to the Dodgers in their own division? Cohen us a smart guy. The Mets should play hardball in these kinds of deals. And do I think Arenado will walk after 1 year? Frankly that’s doubtful, but if he does all we’ve lost is Nimmo. Nice player, but easy to replace. And we’re done with Cano.

    1
    Reply
    • Cosmo2

      4 years ago

      But trading Nimmo subtracts his value and seriously lessens how much you are improving the team by adding Arenado. If they trade for him it should be Cano and prospects so they add without subtracting. But I reeaaaly hope they don’t.

      1
      Reply
      • matteste187

        4 years ago

        That’s y replacing nimmo with JD is better for us and them. They get a direct replacement for arenado, as do we. But they have to take cano back.

        1
        Reply
    • mcmillankmm

      4 years ago

      Doesn’t Nimmo only have 2 years before free agency? Is the salary relief really worth it? Seems like even if they waited a year they could beat that return

      Reply
  9. 99 Captain Judge

    4 years ago

    If the Mets trade for Arenado, starting to think they could be the 2nd best team in NY next season. Well it’s between them and the Blue Jays.

    1
    Reply
    • whyhayzee

      4 years ago

      The best team in New York is only in a hotel for a few days while they visit.

      1
      Reply
    • Aoe3

      4 years ago

      Toronto isnt foolish like the Phillies and going to be signing huge contracts and trading top prospects. (Guirrell for Lindor not happening). IMO Hes going to be mvp calibre one day)

      Jays will likely sign Paxton, a korean infielder, and sign a catcher. not named JT.

      NYY will be in it like anyone else next year.

      1
      Reply
  10. Tom

    4 years ago

    The Rockies are going to find it extremely difficult to move Arenado, especially with that contract and the worry of the Coors Field Effect. Of course there are those that believe it works in reverse, and players can actually get better and healthier leaving the high elevation, but betting $200M on that isn’t something anyone will likely do in this economic environment. If the Rockies truly want to unload Arenado they’re going to have to eat a ton of money ($50M+) to even get the conversation started, and at that point the return will be minimal. With the abundance of middle infielders who are younger and headed to free agency next year, any team with the financial resources to go after Arenado could go after one of them without giving up assets. Arenado is a great player, but I don’t see him being the difference between winning a world series and not, so at this point…why bother, unless the Rockies truly make it worth a team’s interest.

    1
    Reply
  11. crshbng

    4 years ago

    Why do some met fans believe they can get Arenado for a bad contract and spare parts?

    6
    Reply
    • Cosmo2

      4 years ago

      Nimmo isn’t a spare part, if that’s what you mean. But if the Rox trade Arenado its to unload a bad contract, so they probably don’t want to take on a bad contract.

      1
      Reply
      • crshbng

        4 years ago

        Nimmo has played over 100 games a season once, and only 2 years from free agency, highly overrated

        1
        Reply
        • metfan4ever

          4 years ago

          crshbng:: look at Nimmo’s OBP. it’s one of the best in the majors

          Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      the idea of not only giving up little but also sending a bad contract on return is laughable.

      3
      Reply
      • Marty McRae

        4 years ago

        Cano-Arenado actually is fair for both teams, if you think about it like that.

        Does no one remember what was needed for Stanton? With the exception of Trout, big money guys have extreme trade negative value no matter who they are. If the Rockies want good players they are going to have to send along $70M with Arenado, that’s how this trade will actually work, in real time.

        Reply
        • VonPurpleHayes

          4 years ago

          No one is trading for Cano. He may never play again.

          3
          Reply
        • mcmillankmm

          4 years ago

          If the Mets are paying down half of Cano’s remaining salary, maybe the Rockies consider accepting him in a trade…

          1
          Reply
        • AngelDiceClay

          4 years ago

          I think he will. He holds all the cards. The Rockies can risk getting nothing. Arenado can play in Colorad 2021 and opt out and sign with the Dodgers.

          1
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          So you think the Dodgers will give him more than 5/164 at age 31? That’s not happening. He takes a discount? Doubt it. He can’t take the chance of losing all that cash. You think he’s opting out? Ok, what contract is he getting at age 31 that will best what he’s already guaranteed?

          2
          Reply
    • 1984wasntamanual

      4 years ago

      Because Arenado’s contract is bad

      1
      Reply
  12. Get rid of the softball players

    4 years ago

    Never going to happen.should never happen.alderson has rightfully said before he doesn’t want to deplete the farm system.let colorado wither.
    At the trade deadline this year other teams will be looking to get something for their free agents.
    Scherzer,greinke and others will be available for teams that want to make a final push.

    2
    Reply
  13. SJWMets

    4 years ago

    Arenado for…
    Cano
    Familia
    Diaz
    Bonilla

    3
    Reply
    • matteste187

      4 years ago

      Y Diaz?

      Reply
  14. BartoloHRball

    4 years ago

    Arenado’s bat is mediocre away from Coors, he’ll limit how much the Mets can realistically spend to extend Conforto/Syndergaard/etc, and they have more pressing holes to fill. Sticking JD Davis at 3B provides arguably a comparable bat with significantly worse defense (GG–> below avg)….but he costs $190m+ less. The Rockies are supposedly really pressing to move Arenado, so they need to be put over a barrel if they want to move him.

    Arenado + $$ for Cano and a lower-tier prospect. If they want a BP arm, Familia w. a discount on the money goes back. I’m not saying this is what the Rockies want…but I don’t see a $199m contract moving easily when half of the teams in the league are trying to slash their payrolls…including the Yankees.

    1
    Reply
    • Marty McRae

      4 years ago

      6 years of Arenado for 2 years of Cano actually works fine for both teams, nothing else needs to happen. Colorado still has 1B and 2B open and probably still will in 2022, with also the DH getting added to the NL either in 2021 or ’22, so Cano can play one of 3 potential places there. Rockies get $151 million off the books.

      This also allows Cano to numbers-chase while maybe not roiding for once. If he hits like he did last year he will most likely put up big numbers in Denver, even if it’s in 2022/23.

      The contending Mets get one of the best defensive 3B there is for 6 years for $151M, who has a .684 OPS at Citi Field over 91 PA. Thing is, even if that OPS is his ceiling, that’s still a 3-4 WAR player and a big upgrade over Cano for sure. The Mets can also bring in the fences to suit his power swing, so I’d bang the over on that OPS all 6 seasons. Arenado also had an .866 OPS away from Denver in 2019, so I don’t buy that he’s a Denver-only guy.

      I like this move for all parties.

      Reply
      • Rsox

        4 years ago

        Cano will be 39 years old playing the ’22 season. He needs 530 hits to reach 3000 and 66 HR’s to reach 400. Used to be those numbers were locks for the Hall of Fame but he has basically flushed any chance of being elected to the HoF down the toilet so the numbers chasing, at his age, with a year off, will likely come up short. With or without PEDs

        Reply
  15. Dan Hunter

    4 years ago

    Cohen is done with any pickups.

    Reply
    • G Vanlue

      4 years ago

      I mean, why go that route when you can use car service?

      1
      Reply
  16. angt222

    4 years ago

    Mets: Arenado
    Rockies: Cano, Davis, Nimmo, Szapucki
    Rox don’t have to pay Cano in 2021. Also, Historical reference: Rox acquired José Reyes in 2015 (plus others) to move Tulowitzki’s salary. Fact is Cano would be cheaper in 2022-23’ than Arenado and likely will have the DH in 22’.

    Reply
    • Lee Harvey Oddball

      4 years ago

      Davis AND Nimmo? And the Rox are paying $100 million of Arenado’s salary, right? You want a lot of value for a $200 million contract.

      1
      Reply
  17. metfan4ever

    4 years ago

    He does not hit outside Coors field. So no. If they take Cano, and payoff some of his contract YES. But not giving up ANY of our MLB players or TOP minor leaguers

    Reply
    • Marty McRae

      4 years ago

      Nolan Arenado’s 2019 OPS away from Coors field was .866 – that is borderline elite.

      3
      Reply
  18. Deleted Userrr

    4 years ago

    I don’t see Arenado getting traded until next offseason (and that’s if he doesn’t opt-out). There’s too many things working against it. There’s his production (usually great but not good in 2020), the fact that he’s signed through his age 35 season, him having a full NTC, him having an opt-out after 2021 which means he’s essentially a 1-year rental with a 5-year $164m poison pill option that will be exercised if and only if the team doesn’t want it to be exercised and the fact that the Rockies don’t want to give off the illusion of having traded their face of the franchise for nothing.

    1
    Reply
  19. HALfromVA

    4 years ago

    Given Cano’s 2 PED suspensions, every GM out there knows that acquiring him would, more than likely, piss off that teams fan base. Finding someone to take him would be a long shot, at best.

    1
    Reply
  20. BartoloHRball

    4 years ago

    The Mets aren’t giving up 2 starters and a decent prospect (w. dead weight Cano) for freaking Arenado and $199m in liability. There is zero percent chance he opts out after 2021 because NO ONE is giving him a 5yr $30m+ AAV contract. I think it’s an overpay because of the cheap years of control.

    Sandy is a much better strategist and negotiator than used car salesman bro BVW. The Rockies other options include….? Not the Yankees. I guess WAS and ATL, but WAS already has a ton of $$ committed for the next decade and ATL is always a question mark with spending since they went corporate. Some local Denver talk is STL, but again…that much $$ just isn’t a move that the Cardinals make.

    Since 3B isn’t an area of need for the Mets, I’d slow play it while trying to sign Springer, Tanaka, and hopefully Kluber and another RP. It’s aiming high, I just worry about Bauer’s track record and jump in spin rate combined with a supposed crackdown on stuff pitchers can get away with using. Tanaka has had a ticking elbow since joining the Yankees, but he has proven everyone wrong. Kluber is a great upside option, but at least half a dozen teams will make him an offer if he looks good at his throwing session(s).

    1
    Reply
    • 67redsox

      4 years ago

      “Sandy is a much better strategist and negotiator than used car salesman bro BVW.”

      Have you lost your mind…two of the absolute worst contracts given out in history have been under Alderson’s watch…Cepedes and David Wright. Cohen had rocks in his head to bring him back. Stroman has already sucked him in by accepting the QO and now McCann for $40M…can you spell b-o-n-e-h-e-a-d.

      Reply
      • its_happening

        4 years ago

        Hindsight’s 20-20. The contracts were appropriate at the time for both Cespedes and Wright.

        Reply
  21. Rsox

    4 years ago

    I can’t see the Mets taking Arenado unless they get him to waive his opt-out clause ahead of the deal. If thats the Case then the Rockies would be selling extremely low in most of the trade proposals posted. Even with the DH likely coming i doubt the Rockies take Cano back in the deal. He will be another year older before they would see him play and having a year off and facing a lifetime ban if he fails another PEDs test can’t be something any front office would be interested in. The Rockies would almost certainly want either Alonso or Smith and possibly even Rosario or Gimenez since they may lose Trevor Story next winter. Davis, Nimmo, and Familia do not get this done

    Reply
  22. to4

    4 years ago

    I would do Rosario, Gimenez, Nimmo, and Peterson plus prospects for both, Arenado and Story with some cash relieve as well. Then go on to sign Bradley Jr, to play CF and Bauer to pair him with DeGrom, Stroman and Noah when he returns.

    1.McNeil 2B
    2.Story SS
    3.Alonso 1B
    4.Arenado 3B
    5.Conforto RF
    6.Davis LF
    7.Smith DH
    8.McCann C
    9.Bradley Jr. CF

    1.DeGrom
    2.Bauer
    3.Synderguuaard
    4.Stroman
    5.Matz

    Not too bad is it? I also think that Lugo is better suit for a SU role. He’s lights out there. Not so much as a SP.

    Reply
    • rct

      4 years ago

      There is no DH in the NL for 2021.

      1
      Reply
      • MetsFan22

        4 years ago

        It’s still not decided

        Reply
    • Roll

      4 years ago

      and what happens 2022? Story, Conforto, Stoman and Thor are FA and i think Matz too but i could be wrong on that. Cano contract basically eats up atleast 2 of those potential FA and you have no other pipeline for 2022 for a replacement SP and SS. as well as potentially being forced to play an older worse defender at 2nd.

      You are also giving way to much value alone in giminez and peterson. Maybe one but not both. would need to go unless the Rockies paying majority of Arrenado’s contract (like 100M) which i doubt is happening.

      1
      Reply
  23. Cosmo2

    4 years ago

    Let’s just be clear: Arenado is owed 164 million through his age 35 season after the opt out. That means someone would have to give a contract better than 5/164 at age 31 and through his age 36+ seasons. No one is that dumb. He knows it. He is NOT opting out. That anyone thinks otherwise is ridiculous.

    1
    Reply
  24. Superstar Car Wash

    4 years ago

    Hopefully they decide to pass on Nolan Areola; that’s what I’ve been calling him over the last couple of years since he’s been acting like a boob.

    2
    Reply
    • Bill M

      4 years ago

      Tit for tat

      Reply
  25. Stevil

    4 years ago

    If there’s a willingness to absorb a not-so-large contract, Kyle Seager would tighten up NY’s defense at the hot corner. His 2022 team option would become a player option, but it’s 15m. High, but not ridiculous for an established third baseman.

    NY doesn’t need more LHHs, but if a lefty were part of the return? Seattle would still probably have to send some cash, but it’s not hard to see how something could get done between the two clubs.

    Reply
    • Cap & Crunch

      4 years ago

      I like Seager to ATL a LOT more than Mets Stevil but I follow your reasoning –

      Seager also said he would ponder waiving the team option for 22 if it was the right team (no clue what that is to him )

      I see Kyle moving before the deadline but I think its the Braves, especially if Kyle can build upon his 20 season

      Reply
      • Stevil

        4 years ago

        I wrote a piece about Seager making sense for Atlanta at the deadline this year. I know there was interest, but obviously it wasn’t to be.

        Atlanta might have been hesitant because of his salary. That probably hasn’t changed, since his salary was prorated and affordable this last season.

        I think Atlanta would be more likely to simply wait and sign him as a free agent at this point (if they’re still interested). Everybody knows Seattle will be inclined to decline their team option following the 2021 season.

        So, if a trade does happen, I think he’s more likely to land in LA or NY than Atlanta. But I wouldn’t be surprised if he simply plays another season in Seattle and hits free agency in 2022.

        Reply
  26. James1955

    4 years ago

    Nobody is going to give up top prospects and take on Arenado”s contract. Coors field hitter. He is not going to opt out.. The Rockies are stuck with his contract.

    1
    Reply
  27. metfan4ever

    4 years ago

    Angt222 you want to give up 2 of our regular players & keep in mind Nimmo OBP is high 300, close to 400, for a guy who doesn’t hit on the road as he does in hitter friendly Coors field. Citi is not a hitters park. If they want to give us Arenado for Cano and payoff some of his 6 year contract then ok.

    1
    Reply
    • angt222

      4 years ago

      If the Mets sign Springer to play CF, that means Dom is in LF (no DH for 2021). That means Nimmo Is on the bench and Davis maybe plays 3B which could go to McNeil or Giménez. Davis & Nimmo are expendable in an Arenado trade. Cano is included to dump his salary and Szapucki because Rox likely will want one pitching prospect included.

      Reply
      • Cosmo2

        4 years ago

        Ugh. No, just no. First of all, Nimmo would play left, Dom to bench awaiting the DH in the NL… no one is expendable. Plus, the very idea that a player as good as Nimmo could be expendable even if he were pushed to the bench is wrong. He’s still valuable and an overpay for Arenado and that contract. People do realize the Mets don’t HAVE to trade for Arenado don’t they? I really doubt they have any real interest and they shouldn’t. All of these proposals trying to force this guy onto the Mets are absurd.

        1
        Reply
  28. SalaryCapMyth

    4 years ago

    Wow. Is Colorado really approaching the Mets hat-in-hand? That’s a little how the article comes off. The Mets could do this but in my opinion there are better ways for them to go. This is interesting because they will have to convince the Mets to buy in and make it worth it to them. I’m surprised the Rockies have resorted to this rather than just taking the hit and talking to the Dodgers.

    1
    Reply
    • Superstar Car Wash

      4 years ago

      The Mets are in flux right now with everybody settling in, so they don’t have access to all the sabermetrics and algorithms that the Dodgers and Andrew Friedman would have, which is why they would likely decline pursuing Arenado and trading players, but the Rockies might be able to fool the Mets with some statistics from the olden days (home runs, Gold Gloves, etc.), to fool them into acquiring Arenado.

      2
      Reply
  29. Get rid of the softball players

    4 years ago

    Inputs better than article

    Thunder12k
    Rct
    Tom
    Bartolohrball

    Thanks

    Reply
  30. 30 Parks

    4 years ago

    Trade for Lindor, lock him up. Better use of money.

    Reply
  31. Cap & Crunch

    4 years ago

    You can get $1.25 for your dollar in most markets today

    Arenado gives you 0.90 cents on the dollar

    Most descions are are very complex for orgs, this one just needs simple econ-1 imo

    Pass

    Reply
    • 67redsox

      4 years ago

      Arenado would pass on the Mets…would not consider going for a moment. He wants to play on a winner. If he did consider it on the advise of his agent the Mets would have to cough up deGrom.

      Reply
      • Cosmo2

        4 years ago

        That’s a ridiculous take

        1
        Reply
  32. jim stem

    4 years ago

    Let’s do something that works for both teams.

    Rockies unload the contracts of Arenado and Blackmon, maybe even Jon Gray. That means their need starts with Nimmo and Davis with Matz in return.

    Contract flip of Familia and one of our three shortstops, which allows them to trade Story for more parts.

    Rockies have some nice young talent and a couple of good arms. I don’t think they need a total breakdown. If they take Davis 3b/1b and Nimmo, that’s 2 ready for every day duty players. We could ask for Tapia CF and that’s done.

    Story would bring any remaining pieces needed.

    Blackmon goes to Rf for the Mets, Tapia to center, Conforto to left.
    Arenado 3b and Gimenez SS next to McNeil and Alonso. McCann catching 2/3 of the season.

    That leaves a decent amount for another starter and #2 catcher.

    That still leaves us Smith to dh and cover 1b if needed.

    DeGrom
    Stroman
    Peterson
    Gray
    Lugo
    …is solid.

    Reply
    • Bill M

      4 years ago

      Sorry Jim stem but I see a lot of problems with that scenario. Just a few of the bat:

      Matz would be a disaster in Denver.
      No DH in the NL in 2021 so where does Dom play?
      You’re taking a huge chance with Peterson as your 3rd starter. He’s a 5 guy for now.
      Lugo in the rotation is NOT solid at all.

      Reply
  33. atmospherechanger

    4 years ago

    Why would the Mets be interested in Nolan? DJLM proved all Rockies players are “Coors Field Creations.”

    Reply
  34. phillyballers

    4 years ago

    How much of the $ are the Rockies willing to eat? Outside the box… are they able to trade Cano? Salary is $0 this year, 44M left on the deal. Instead of paying Arenado to play for the Mets, that could be the trade off they need to better facilitate the deal. Before you start talking real compensation.

    Reply
  35. larkraxm

    4 years ago

    Look at Stanton to NY Yankees as template.

    Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      Jeter gifted Stanton to the Yankees by only taking Starlin Castro in return and sending money. I’m not sure the Rockies are looking to gift anyone anything

      Reply
      • Cosmo2

        4 years ago

        It’s also a totally different situation… the Marlins HAD to trade Stanton while the Rox just want to trade Arenado. And Stantons contract was even worse.

        Reply
  36. tjaro9

    4 years ago

    How about this trade……
    Smith and Rosario for Trea turner and Ben braymer(lefty out of bullpen)

    Reply
  37. 66TheNumberOfTheBest

    4 years ago

    Nothing says leverage like sleeping on the curb outside the pawn shop waiting for them to open.

    Mid market teams having to beg large market teams to take their best player doesn’t seem like something that should happen in a healthy sports league.

    Reply
  38. Tom1968

    4 years ago

    With a little luck, cano fails a 3rd test.

    Reply
    • Arnold Ziffel

      4 years ago

      As a Rockies fan no way for Cano. Reyes was bad enough.

      1
      Reply
      • Tom1968

        4 years ago

        Reyes came from toronto , not ny and except for his last yr where he coudnt adapt as a bench guy he was good the 2nd time around

        Reply
  39. Cosmo2

    4 years ago

    Here’s a proposal: the Rockies keep Arenado and that lead weight of a contract. How about that?

    Reply
  40. Chris. 50

    4 years ago

    Acquiring Arenado is a terrible idea.

    Not only is he over 30, with a massive albatross of a contract, but his career numbers away from Coors are mediocre to worse. He is a career ,263 hitter with a .322 OBP away from Coors.

    Hard pass.

    2
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Jackson Jobe To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Shane McClanahan Pauses Rehab, Seeking Further Opinions On Nerve Issue

    Red Sox To Acquire Jorge Alcala

    Royals Place Cole Ragans On IL With Rotator Cuff Strain

    Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Recent

    MLB Mailbag: Williams, Trade Deadline, Valdez, Keith, Red Sox, Muncy, Jays’ Outfield

    Jackson Jobe To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    MLBTR Podcast: White Sox Ownership, Roman Anthony, And The Diamondbacks’ Rotation

    Shane McClanahan Pauses Rehab, Seeking Further Opinions On Nerve Issue

    Red Sox To Acquire Jorge Alcala

    Yankees Considering Starts For Ben Rice At Catcher

    Dodgers Moving Ben Casparius To Starting Rotation

    Red Sox Outright Robert Stock

    Angels Sign Chad Wallach To Minor League Deal

    Giants Select Logan Porter, Designate Osleivis Basabe For Assignment

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version