Left-hander Tanner Scott won his arbitration hearing with the Marlins, according to MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand (X link). The Marlins were looking to pay Scott $5.15MM in 2023, but the reliever will instead earn his desired figure of $5.7MM.
The salary checks in just slightly under the $5.8MM that MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz projected for Scott, but it’s still a very nice raise for the southpaw in his final year of arbitration eligibility. Scott avoided arbitration in his first two winters of eligibility, and his $5.7MM salary is more than double the $2.825MM he earned in 2023.
The payday comes in the wake of the best season of Scott’s seven-year MLB career. The lefty posted a 2.31 ERA over 78 innings for Miami, and only four pitchers topped Scott’s total of 74 appearances. Beyond the durability, Scott’s Statcast page is a veritable sea of red, as he ranked in at least the 90th percentile of almost every major statistical category. The eye-popping numbers included a 33.9% strikeout rate, 26.3% hard-hit ball rate, and 35.3% chase rate that all ranked among the league’s elite.
Scott’s 7.8% walk rate was modest in comparison, sitting at “only” the 60th percentile of all pitchers. Yet this stat was perhaps the key element to Scott’s success, given how control problems have plagued his career — Scott had a career 14.2% walk rate prior to his greatly improved 7.8BB% last season. Pundits and scouts have long felt that Scott had elite potential if he could ever harness his stuff, and 2023 is a very promising sign that Scott has now turned the corner at age 29.
Scott moved into the closer’s job down the stretch for Miami and looks to assume that same role heading into the coming season. Since he is set to hit free agency next winter, Scott stands out as a potential trade chip if the Marlins aren’t in contention by the deadline. There was even some speculative trade buzz around Scott this winter given the Marlins’ surplus of left-handed relievers, though the Fish already moved another southpaw last week when Steven Okert was dealt to the Twins for Nick Gordon.
Scott’s case was the final pending arbitration hearing of the 2023-24 offseason, and the players emerged with a winning record from this year’s slate of hearings. Players won nine of the 15 cases that went to arbitration.
Redsoxx_62
Anyone want to bet where he’s being traded to?
mlb fan
“Where he’s being traded to”….Actually now might be the best time to trade Scott because he’s had an up and down career and his value will never be higher than it is right now. The Fish need another bat and maybe they could net a decent hitter in trade with Scott.
tpaine69
He’s always had good stuff but changed his mechanics last year and greatly helped his control.
Buzzz Killington
Marlins owners going to sue over this one.
Niekro floater
Exactly, bet Marlins FO is pissed. This doesn’t fit into their miserly ways plus gota teach Tanner n future arbitration eligible players in Miami a valuable lesson. Think it was Charlie Finley who said “Don’t bite the hand that barely feeds u.”
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Seems like mediocre closers are paid more than pretty good middle relievers.
Poolhalljunkies
This guy looks like a bargain based on his performance in 2023
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Yeah, you guys are right. I remember how awful Scott was in 2022, but I see he cut his walks in 2023 and improved overall.
benhen77
3.6 WAR from a lefty reliever? There’s a lot of value there.
johncal25
This is not a mediocre closer. At least not based off his improved numbers last year.
Let’s Go O’s
Dude’s deliver comes from 1B with a big launch and long body
gbs42
Saves get paid. Arbitration panel members generally aren’t big baseball fans.
cpdpoet
Players won 9/16, that’s a ratio I can live with. Understand why the management side fights like this, but some of the #’s they fight over seem trivial? (like 500k or less)
Well no system is perfect…
Let’s Go O’s
O’s and Webb squabbled over $75k. He won
mlb fan
“Fight over seem trivial”….Some people suggest $500K or less is a meaningless amount but no one could name an industry or business that would not contest a $500K difference of opinion or even a $100K difference of opinion. $500K is only meaningless when it’s not your money and there’s a reason they call it “business”, and not personal.
cpdpoet
Fine semantics…..”go into arbitration on opposing sides”
Point was maybe when the amount comes in at 500k or less, MLB decides that they come in at 1/2 that to avoid what could be a messy process?
500k is 500k just questioning a tiny bit the actual methodology. That’s why I ended with -no system is perfect.
Niekro floater
Throw your player a happy bone n split the difference. Going through arbitration process can be tough on players cause they’re gonna highlight n pound away on your weaknesses on field. Tear u down, “What do u really think bout me ?” Know its business but still its cutthroat.
westcasey
I like Scott from the Bullpen. He sure was tough last season. I think he could bring a nice return in trade.
C Yards Jeff
Looks like Orioles GM lost that trade that sent Scott to the Fish. In the long run maybe the Os get something out of Jud Fabian? TBD. Congrats Tanner. Like the Orioles FO I gave up on you too (because of control issues). Oops.
Blackpink in the area
Scott
Luzardo
For
Westburg
Cowser
Wagner
MARLIN POWER 18
@Blackpink in the area
No, but you can have Scott, Luzardo and Mesa Jr. for Cowser, Westburg and Basallo.
Blackpink in the area
My suggestion was fair yours was not. I suppose that’s the benefit of not having a bias and using the trade simulator.
BannedMarlinsFanBase
@Blackpink in the area
Will you come back to our articles and own up to something when none of your poorly thought-out, O’s Homer trade suggestions come to fruition?
Blackpink in the area
I am not an Orioles fan fella
BannedMarlinsFanBase
Then what’s your obsession with offering such ridiculous trade suggestions regarding the Marlins?
Blackpink in the area
I believe the Marlins should deal Luzardo and play for 2025. And the Orioles have players the Marlins could use.
BannedMarlinsFanBase
Well, if you notice, multiple Marlins fans find your belief stupid. Do you not get the hint from that?
And what team do you root for?
Blackpink in the area
It’s you and 1 other Marlins fan. Again you have a bias I don’t. Take it easy.
BannedMarlinsFanBase
Actually, a couple of others have done it on another post you said this rididulous stuff on. But let’s say one on this board. The FACT that two of us call you out on it doesn’t say something?
And again, who do you root for?
Blackpink in the area
The fact is you are a homer. The irony is you accused me of being a homer when it’s you that is one.
BannedMarlinsFanBase
Oh, so now we’re playing “Oh know you are, but what am I?”
Why do you keep avoiding the question about who you root for?