Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

A’s Sign Brent Rooker To Five-Year Extension

By Anthony Franco | January 8, 2025 at 7:10pm CDT

The A’s have officially announced a five-year contract extension with designated hitter Brent Rooker. The deal includes a club/vesting option for 2030. Rooker, a client of The Bledsoe Agency, is reportedly guaranteed $60MM. The option’s base value is $22MM and could push as high as $30MM based on his MVP finishes. Rooker had been under arbitration control for three seasons, so the deal buys out at least two free agent years.

Rooker receives a $10MM signing bonus and a $2MM salary for the upcoming season. He’ll make $6MM in 2026, $12MM in ’27, $13MM in ’28 and $17MM in ’29. The $22MM option would vest if Rooker reaches 500 plate appearances in 2029 or combines for 900 PAs between 2028-29. He’d also unlock the option with two top 10 MVP finishes between 2027-29. Finishing in the top 10 in MVP balloting in any of the next five years could escalate the option value.

It’s another significant investment in what has been a huge offseason by A’s standards. As shown on MLBTR’s Contract Tracker, Rooker becomes the first A’s player to sign a five-year deal since the club extended starting pitcher Trevor Cahill for $30.5MM in 2011. It’s the team’s second investment for $60MM+ this winter. Last month, they added Luis Severino on a three-year, $67MM free agent deal that represented the largest contract in franchise history.

Rooker securing such a contract would have been impossible to envision two years ago. He landed with the A’s on a waiver claim early in the 2022-23 offseason. Rooker was a 28-year-old DH/corner outfielder who had bounced between the Twins, Padres and Royals without getting much of a look at any stop. As a former top 35 overall draft pick who had hit well in the minors, he was a sensible waiver target. The A’s certainly didn’t envision it working out this well, though.

The righty-swinging Rooker has become not only one of the most successful waiver claims in recent memory but one of baseball’s best hitters. He popped 30 home runs in 526 plate appearances to earn an All-Star selection in 2023. While he was snubbed from the Midsummer Classic last season, Rooker took another major step forward. He connected on 39 homers, 26 doubles and a pair of triples with a massive .293/.365/.562 batting line across 614 plate appearances.

Rooker finished tied for fifth (alongside José Ramírez and Marcell Ozuna) in home runs. Only Aaron Judge, Shohei Ohtani, Anthony Santander and Juan Soto hit more. Among hitters with at least 500 PAs, Rooker ranked in the top 20 in all three slash stats. He finished sixth in slugging — trailing Judge, Ohtani, Bobby Witt Jr., Soto, and Yordan Alvarez.

It’s now two seasons of borderline elite offensive production. Rooker has a .272/.348/.528 slash through more than 1100 plate appearances in an A’s uniform. He’s in the top 15 in slugging percentage and ranks ninth in homers since the start of the ’23 campaign. He’s a middle-of-the-order presence.

There is a decent amount of swing-and-miss to his game. Rooker has fanned in more than 30% of his plate appearances with the A’s. Last year’s production was driven in part by a .362 average on balls in play that’ll be difficult to maintain. Rooker makes a ton of hard contact, though, so he’s probably in line for a modest BABIP regression rather than a huge drop-off.

The ball-in-play normalization happened at the end of last season. Rooker carried an unsustainable .390 BABIP into the All-Star Break. That dropped to .333 in the second half. To his credit, Rooker compensated by cutting his strikeout rate to a much more manageable 24.1% clip during that stretch. It remains to be seen whether he’ll maintain that level of contact, but it’s an encouraging development that presumably affirmed the front office’s confidence in his hitting acumen.

Even if he doesn’t hit .290 while pushing 40 home runs on an annual basis, Rooker should remain an impact bat. The A’s have made clear they envisioned him as the long-term anchor of their lineup. The team reportedly took him off the market in advance of last summer’s trade deadline. They had no interest in allowing trade rumors to rekindle during the offseason. GM David Forst declared within a week of the offseason beginning that the A’s weren’t dealing Rooker. They’re doubling down by committing to him through at least the 2029 season.

Rooker surpassed three years of major league service last season. He was entering his first of three arbitration seasons. MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz had projected a $5.1MM salary for next year. Rooker will reportedly receive $30MM over what would have been his arbitration window. That leaves an average of $15MM annually for the two free agent seasons. It’s not quite a front-loaded contract, but it appears Rooker will make a little more in the next couple years than he would have had he gone through the arbitration process.

The team makes that tradeoff for the chance to keep him at below-market rates during the 2028-29 seasons — which are scheduled to be their first two years in Las Vegas. The A’s didn’t have any money guaranteed beyond 2027. Severino and recent trade pickup Jeffrey Springs were their only players signed past next season.

The A’s revenue sharing status has been a significant storyline this offseason. Evan Drellich and Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic reported last month that the team could need to push its competitive balance tax payroll to roughly $105MM to avoid an MLBPA grievance. Teams are required to spend revenue sharing money on the on-field product.

Extending Rooker will push their tax number up, though it’s not by a huge amount. The contract comes with a $12MM average annual value. The AAV is the number used for tax purposes, so it wouldn’t matter how the salaries are distributed. Rooker had already been expected to make around $5MM next season. This adds roughly $7MM to the team’s tax number, which will check in around $97MM (as calculated by RosterResource).

The tax number isn’t finalized until the end of the year, so the remainder of the A’s offseason and in-season activity can push that further. Tax considerations are relevant but are far from the only reason for the A’s to make this deal. If they were solely concerned about pushing next season’s CBT number, they could have signed a handful of mid-tier free agents to one-year contracts.

Rooker turned 30 in November. A five-year commitment runs through his age-34 season. There’s some risk in a five-year deal for a player in his 30s who doesn’t provide much defensive value. Yet if Rooker continues hitting at anywhere near this level, his arbitration price tag would have climbed quickly anyhow. He could have put himself in position for an AAV in the $20-25MM range once he hit free agency, a number that the A’s may have been disinclined to match.

At the same time, it’s easy to see the appeal for Rooker of locking in the security. It wasn’t that long ago that he looked like a fringe roster player. He wouldn’t have gotten to free agency until his age-33 season, when a three- or four-year deal might’ve been the ceiling. Sacrificing a little bit of long-term earning upside to avoid injury risk over the next couple seasons is understandable.

This should also solidify Rooker’s spot in what looks to be an up-and-coming A’s lineup. Lawrence Butler, Jacob Wilson, Tyler Soderstrom, Shea Langeliers, JJ Bleday and rebound candidate Zack Gelof have promise as an offensive core. Last summer’s fourth overall pick Nick Kurtz could move quickly as a polished college hitter. The A’s still need a lot to break right to contend in 2025, but things are starting to come into focus. Soderstrom and Kurtz fit best at first base, so perhaps there’ll be a logjam down the line with Rooker locked in at designated hitter. That’d be a good problem to have if both young first basemen reach their offensive ceilings and Rooker continues to hit at an All-Star level.

Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic first reported that the A’s and Rooker were in agreement on a five-year, $60MM deal with a vesting option that could get to $30MM. Jeff Passan of ESPN reported that the option’s base was $22MM and that Rooker would make $30MM over the first three seasons. Jon Heyman of the New York Post reported the salary breakdown and the vesting provisions.

Image courtesy of Imagn.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Newsstand Oakland Athletics Transactions Brent Rooker

MLBTR Podcast: Brent Rooker’s Extension, Gavin Lux, And Catching Up On The Holiday Transactions
Main
Angels, Brock Burke Avoid Arbitration
View Comments (151)
Post a Comment

151 Comments

  1. don_mossi_ears

    5 months ago

    Wow. Seems like a bargain for today’s market.

    42
    Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      5 months ago

      It is if rook kept hitting with a 900 ops then he could’ve gotten 100 mil

      1
      Reply
      • rct

        5 months ago

        Only if he’s a free agent. He wouldn’t have been a free agent for three more years and is already 30 years old.

        27
        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          5 months ago

          Exactly. Given his age, it’s great for him to lock in the money. He’ll also be tradable down the road should be continue to hit but the A’s decide to move on. Not playing in Oakland, how many bombs will he hit?

          3
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          5 months ago

          IMHO, more guys should be taking the money. There is nothing wrong with betting on yourself, but now he is set for life, and in a place where he might feel very comfortable.

          7
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          5 months ago

          Totally agree Joe. Four every five to ten who bet on themselves, there will be usually one who pays the price (Alonso turning down the Mets offer is not what I mean)
          To be that one is simply not worth it. If you banked $$ already, take that chance but in his case, it’s nice to see..

          1
          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          5 months ago

          You could make an observation that he has had two good years and he is already 29. I doubt he continues to improve. On the flip side the As are getting a bargain for his production.

          Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      5 months ago

      This was the Sacramento A’s best move of the off-season!

      Yay, Sacramento A’s!

      9
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        5 months ago

        Also open to reasonable extensions for Shea Langeliers, Lawrence Butler and Nick Kurtz as a way to get to the $105 million competitive balace tax payroll. This will enable the Sacramento A’s to have further team stability over the next half dozen years.

        5
        Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        5 months ago

        Agreed. This is great news for the city of Sacramento and the entire Sacramento A’s organization.

        11
        Reply
        • differentbears

          5 months ago

          And therefore, the world.

          9
          Reply
        • zacharydmanprin

          5 months ago

          They will play in West Sacramento, Yolo County; across the river from Sacramento.

          2
          Reply
        • Bart Harley Jarvis

          5 months ago

          Exactly, the Sacramento A’s of Sacramento, California!

          5
          Reply
        • differentbears

          5 months ago

          I’ve been conflicted about whether to say anything, because I feel like Zachary D. Manprin could comment about it even without the Yolo. His post didn’t need to mention the Yolo! And that is why this is so tough… for me to tell about the YOLO.

          1
          Reply
        • Bart Harley Jarvis

          5 months ago

          Thank you.

          1
          Reply
        • smuzqwpdmx

          5 months ago

          The ballpark is far closer to downtown Sacramento than most of the city of Sacramento is. I’ve probably been to that ballpark 15 times, and either parked or got off light rail in downtown Sacramento ~13 of those times to walk across the bridge to the park.

          They’re certainly dramatically more Sacramento than the Angels are Los Angeles.

          1
          Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        5 months ago

        West Sacramento A’s of YOLO County.

        2
        Reply
        • Bart Harley Jarvis

          5 months ago

          Exactly, the Sacramento A’s of Sacramento, California!

          Reply
    • JackStrawb

      5 months ago

      @don_mossi_ears One Pete Alonso-style empty 30 HR year worth a couple of wins, then a terrific season at 29 whose only real difference is that it was propelled by a .362 BABIP that bloated Rooker’s career .230 BA into a .365 OBP in 2024 despite no increase in his BB rate.

      Instead of enjoying his arb years on the cheap the A’s just HAD to ensure they have Rooker while he declines and until he’s out of baseball. Guys like Rooker, very, very late bloomers, just the one good year—a very lucky year—are done in their early 30s 9 times out of 10.

      There are worse moves, but it reeks of an A’s FO desperate to look busy because Jesu… I mean Las Vegas is coming and because Manfred is in the corner furiously tapping its $12,000 tassled loafers.

      2
      Reply
    • Flanster

      5 months ago

      @DonMossi—-I still remember marveling at Don Mossi ’s ears on his baseball card in the 60’s

      5
      Reply
    • GASoxFan

      5 months ago

      I’m amused that the twins let both ortiz and rooker walk for nothing…

      Reply
  2. giantsfan25

    5 months ago

    What a steal

    23
    Reply
  3. Rsox

    5 months ago

    Good move for the A’s. Bought out all of his arbitration years ensuring cost certainty and a pair of free agent years ensuring he’ll be with the team when they move to Vegas

    15
    Reply
    • crazybaseballgal

      5 months ago

      IF they close the deal on Vegas.

      11
      Reply
      • Local

        5 months ago

        You might want to check out all the final approvals from the Las Vegas Stadium Authority, MORE THAN A MONTH AGO. Lease is approved, as are Non-Relocation Agreement, Development Agreement, and Community Benefits Agreement. There are no more documents needing approval from the Stadium Authority. US Bank has committed to supply the loan money that the As were seeking, and Goldman Sachs has audited the Fisher family finances and affirmed that they are well able to keep their commitments. Construction of the new stadium will begin this spring after a few minor construction approvals from the County, which are a foregone conclusion.

        1
        Reply
  4. BlooperDisbeliever

    5 months ago

    Woah. I expected some front-loaded deal to put them over the grievance threshold. If he’s anywhere close to last year this should be tremendous. 3 Arb years that’d probably total $14M, so another 2 for 45. should be ok value. That last year doesn’t seem like a great idea for a 35 year old DH.

    6
    Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      5 months ago

      He’s already 30 so I can understand his motivation.

      11
      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      5 months ago

      MLB-R has him at $5.1M for this season, so his three-year total could be close to $25-30M. On the final year, I figure if he vests, then he’s probably done enough to be worth it.

      1
      Reply
  5. Luke Strong

    5 months ago

    Nice move by the A’s. Rooker is a stud.

    2
    Reply
  6. bob9988 2

    5 months ago

    How does Oakland get these guys to sign under market contracts?

    1
    Reply
    • shark stitches

      5 months ago

      Who else did they get to sign under market contracts?

      16
      Reply
      • Blue Baron

        5 months ago

        shark stitches: By what measure is it under market for his age and service time?

        4
        Reply
        • stymeedone

          5 months ago

          Also, he’s a DH only.

          2
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          5 months ago

          Blue Baron
          shark stitches: By what measure is it under market
          =====================
          My guess is that the floor on his arb years is $25M, and probably closer to $30M, making his two FA buy-out years $30M/2.

          Soto will be getting $51M for his 178 OPS+, so I figure $15M for Rooker’s 165+ is a pretty good bargain.

          5
          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          5 months ago

          JoeBrady: Comparing Soto and Rooker is not apples to apples given that they were not both free agents.

          5
          Reply
    • Waldo29

      5 months ago

      Who are you including as “these guys”? Because, as a lifelong A’s fan, we never have someone signed to bargain contracts unless it’s a young player and even then it’s been a long time lol

      And when we do go big (by our standards), the deal turns out like Billy Butler and Trevor Rosenthal

      13
      Reply
    • bryanestrella7

      5 months ago

      He is 30 with only 2 good years good deal for him and his family.

      10
      Reply
    • Gwynning

      5 months ago

      Oak… who??

      Great move A’s and nice bag Rook!

      11
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        5 months ago

        Not for nothing Gwynning, but I can generally upvote your comments without looking.

        4
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          5 months ago

          *hat tip and a wink* JB

          Reply
  7. Van Lingle Mungo

    5 months ago

    He must have a lot of love for Sacramento. That does not seem like a lot of money for a guy with 5.6 WAR last season. Then again, he is 30.

    3
    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      5 months ago

      He’s 30 and was suppressed via arb.

      18
      Reply
    • astros_fan_84

      5 months ago

      It’s hard to fault a 30 year old DH for cashing in on 60M. That’s an incredibly high amount of money for a late bloomer.

      27
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        5 months ago

        This is one of my favorite things about BB. In every other sport, you are generally in or you’re out. In BB, you can struggle for 10 years, looking to scrape by at Starbucks in the off-season, then blossom as an RP at age 30 and make millions.

        10
        Reply
  8. shark stitches

    5 months ago

    That’s a great deal for the A’s.

    3
    Reply
  9. DonOsbourne

    5 months ago

    I get why they did it, but this will end poorly. This is Chris Davis waiting to happen.

    1
    Reply
    • shark stitches

      5 months ago

      It’s $12M per year Nostradamus. They got about $25M in value from him just last year.

      25
      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        5 months ago

        They weren’t going to pay him $12MM total for the next 2.

        It’s a solid R/R for a team that needs to spend but I don’t think it’s a crazy bargain given his age, relatively short 2 year track record, and defensive limitation

        4
        Reply
      • DonOsbourne

        5 months ago

        A 30 year old, RH hitting, DH-only, who strikes out 30% of the time is a bad investment. I get he had a great year, but the odds are against him. They would have been better off trading him at peek value.

        8
        Reply
        • DonOsbourne

          5 months ago

          *peak*

          4
          Reply
        • Denden

          5 months ago

          He’s had two good years. The A’s got a low cost deal that will be highly desirable on the trade market if they decide to trade him

          1
          Reply
    • don_mossi_ears

      5 months ago

      Rooker hit .293 last year. Davis never hit over .250.

      3
      Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      5 months ago

      Davis signed in 2016 for 7/161. This is Jose Abreu at worst and Abreu signed at age 36.

      Reply
      • DonOsbourne

        5 months ago

        I just mean in terms of a steep drop off in production. When Rooker declines, it’ll be fast and furious.

        Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          5 months ago

          Let’s assume Rooker maintains his production over the next three years. His arb salary this year is projected to be $5.1M. These are my guesses: ’26 – $14M, ’27 – $22.5M. That’s $41M. Is $19M for two years of a declining firstbaseman/DH that bad taking into consideration the salary inflation in another three years?

          3
          Reply
        • DonOsbourne

          5 months ago

          His BAbip last season was .362. For a guy who doesn’t run well, that isn’t sustainable for two years much less another three. The regression will come quickly and sharply. A large market team can maybe absorb that kind of mistake, but this contract will hurt the A’s for more years than it will help.

          I don’t want to be the negative guy here. But the stats are impossible to ignore. Great for the A’s locking up one of their guys. They should have picked a different guy.

          2
          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          5 months ago

          You’re way high on his arb figures. Spotrac had him at $3.5MM projected this year.

          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          5 months ago

          I see MLBTR had him at $5.1MM though.

          Still on the high side on your increases there but that helps. He would’ve made more than $12MM over 2 years.

          3
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          5 months ago

          This website is actually accurate on their arb projection figures. Spotrac is not.

          5
          Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          5 months ago

          @Ragnarok The Athletics and Fangraphs often quote this site’s MLB arb projections. I’ve yet to see any website use Sportrac’s.

          2
          Reply
        • letsgooakland123

          5 months ago

          1 – BAbip has much more to do with contact quality than base running
          2 – he’s an above average base runner anyways (68 value per Statcast)

          His BAbip was .362, which was much higher than the league average .292. However, he also makes much stronger contact than the rest of the league (line drive 49.9%, 11% above league average in 2024). His career line drive is 49.4% and his career BABip is .327. I think it’s fair to say that he’ll stay around there for his career, but for the sake of argument let’s say it falls to .310 and split the difference.

          Ok, so his batting average based on 2024 would fall to .241. OBP would fall from .365 to .334. Calculating SLG fall off is difficult because I’d have to know how many singles, doubles, triples, HRs, walks, HBPs he had. But let’s say it falls from .562 to .500, his career average.

          Batting line .243/.334/.500 for an OPS of .834.

          That projection pegs him for an OPS+ of around 130-135? For that kind of production and limited defensive versatility 5/60 is a fair deal for both sides.

          5
          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          5 months ago

          @yankees

          Yeah. Spotrac is a great resource for salary info but they evidently don’t have anything remotely decent for projecting arb salaries.

          Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          5 months ago

          @Ragnarok

          My arb projections are little high as I didn’t realize his very limited outfield play. However, it’s not really far off-line when you consider that only six outfielders including hit over 30 homeruns in ’24. If an arb panel determines that he qualifies as an outfielder in ’25, he will get quite a raise. It’s moot now as he signed an extension.

          Reply
    • don_mossi_ears

      5 months ago

      Oops I was thinking of Khris Davis, the former A’s slugger.

      1
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        5 months ago

        Krush Davis was the king at hitting .247

        9
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          5 months ago

          I was amazed when he did it in back-to-back years… hooooh boy, that was just the beginning!

          9
          Reply
    • Lapillus

      5 months ago

      Cheaper than Chris Taylor, we’ll take it

      Reply
  10. YankeesBleacherCreature

    5 months ago

    Amazing job, A’s!

    (Somewhere Scott Boras just shed a tear.)

    6
    Reply
  11. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    5 months ago

    Is this like the longest deal the A’s have ever handed out? At least in recent memory?

    3
    Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      5 months ago

      Matching Eric Chavez’ 5 years I think.

      2
      Reply
  12. casualfan

    5 months ago

    Well done, Oakl…errr, Sacra….errr, Vega….errrr, Yeah, that’s it, Vegas A’s!

    10
    Reply
    • Bart Harley Jarvis

      5 months ago

      Yes, the Sacramento A’s! Woot woot!

      3
      Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        5 months ago

        Exactly, the Sacramento A’s of Sacramento, California!

        Reply
    • gbs42

      5 months ago

      Just “the A’s” until they move to Vegas.

      1
      Reply
      • Gwynning

        5 months ago

        I want them to play at least one game a year at Montreal… then they’re the Canadien A’s!

        Reply
  13. Ben K

    5 months ago

    Good to see for A’s fans.

    3
    Reply
  14. don_mossi_ears

    5 months ago

    I think A’s can compete in AL West next season. Astros seem worse, Mariners can’t hit, Angels are rebuilding. Only team I would worry about is Rangers because Bochy showed that every other year World Series magic with Giants in 2010-2014.

    11
    Reply
    • orbitsbrother

      5 months ago

      They likely compete with Texas for third place. It is still the Astros division.

      Reply
      • Mets Era Thumping Soto

        5 months ago

        The Astros will be lucky to finish .500.

        2
        Reply
        • orbitsbrother

          5 months ago

          That’s wishful thinking by you.

          1
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          5 months ago

          No it’s just reality

          Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      5 months ago

      With the present roster configurations, Mariners, Rangers, Astros and A’s all look like teams that will win between 74 and 86 games next year. If deGrom is healthy all season that could easily be the difference, but a healthy deGrom for a full season seems unlikely.

      2
      Reply
  15. LordD99

    5 months ago

    He’s already 30 and couldn’t be a free agent for another three years. No leverage.

    4
    Reply
    • outinleftfield

      5 months ago

      Still a nice paycheck. Just got generational wealth handed to him when he is a guy that as recently as 2022 was a negative WAR for his career and was bouncing from team to team worrying about whether or not his career was over. Good for him.

      4
      Reply
      • oldgfan

        5 months ago

        All he needed was a team to give him regular playing time. A’s do it a lot.

        2
        Reply
  16. good vibes only

    5 months ago

    A’s having themselves an interesting offseason..

    11
    Reply
    • sadmarinersfan

      5 months ago

      Indeed. They were also apparently very aggressive on max fried. Seems like their ownership was just trying to get them out of Oakland before he was willing to spend

      1
      Reply
      • baycommuter 2

        5 months ago

        It’s like the husband going out and buying the sports car when the divorce becomes final.

        4
        Reply
      • outinleftfield

        5 months ago

        He is only willing to spend because if he didn’t, he was going to lose his revenue sharing money. He doesn’t have a choice.

        7
        Reply
      • enricopallazzo

        5 months ago

        It’s almost as if he suppressed the payroll on purpose to tank and turn Oakland fans away even more, in addition to raising ticket prices the same time they held a mini-fire sale. All to help point the finger at Oakland as the problem, taking it off of himself (Fisher) when announcing and proceeding to move the team. .

        4
        Reply
  17. SeaIndy

    5 months ago

    Announce Robinson Cano to the Mariners as their big free agent acquisition.

    3
    Reply
  18. sadmarinersfan

    5 months ago

    Seems like the type of deal that is good for a year or two, but looks pretty bad towards the back end. Hopefully that’s not the case, I like Brent rooker, I never would’ve thought he’d be getting a 90 million dollar extension a couple years ago when he was getting dfad and claimed every other week

    Reply
  19. Greensoxbaseball

    5 months ago

    Great deal for the A’s imo

    1
    Reply
  20. GO1962

    5 months ago

    The Athletics take a gamble on a 5 year contract with a player who has surpassed his 30th birthday. Anyone want to place a bet on whether the contract will pay off for the Athletics over the 5 year period?

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      5 months ago

      Anyone want to place a bet on whether the contract will pay off
      ========================
      I’d make that bet. Assuming he was fairly automatic to be retained for his 3 arb years, then this is $30M/2 for the buy-out. With inflation what it is, I’d bet he’d make that easily. Pederson just picked up $37M/2.

      Reply
  21. baycommuter 2

    5 months ago

    It may not be a good deal on the back end but it’s not that expensive. The A’s have to stop trading their best players well before they reach free agency for their fans, young stars (and their agents) to take them seriously.

    2
    Reply
  22. Mlbfan78

    5 months ago

    If he was 23 this wouldn’t have been that great of a deal for him, however at 30 with 3 more arb years ahead of him, this makes perfect sense, gets life changing money and look what Walker got to sign with Houston, the numbers are similar once you remove the arb years & Rooker would have been Walkers age if he didn’t sign this deal so the going rate still applies here & he has security & the A’s move closer to that 105 mil number they have to reach, & have a slugger under team control for a few years.

    6
    Reply
  23. YourDreamGM

    5 months ago

    A+ for A’s. Can’t imagine them getting him cheaper. 2 free agent years for the price of 1. As free agent he might got 3 or 4 years.

    1
    Reply
    • DonOsbourne

      5 months ago

      Come on Dream. I get it. Everybody wants to see the A’s finally spend some dollars. But this is spending for the sake of spending. Smart money wins baseball games. Ask a simple question: Would the Yankees have made this move? Of course they would have. But would the Rays have made this move? Not in a million years. That says everything.

      4
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        5 months ago

        I think it’s team friendly. I think the Rays or any team would do this. I see why they didn’t trade him now. Either get something great or we extend him. I don’t give a it if A’s spend $ or not. Any team that did this would get a A.

        There isn’t much risk. He would have to drastically fall off to not be worth this. Best case he doesn’t and it’s buy 1 free agent year get 1 free.

        Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          5 months ago

          Just as important as his talent is the pr. Going to a new city. Maybe going to new city again. Nice to say hey we will spend $. Lock up our good players.

          1
          Reply
      • LaFleur

        5 months ago

        Ehhh the Yankees didn’t sign Luke Voit for 5 years… Rays signed Wander Franco for 10 years

        Maybe not an A+ signing, but he’s not wrong about the free agent years. If Rooker keeps mashing and baseball contracts keep trending like they do that first free agent year in 2028 will be a steal. Then again the Mets are offering 90 million to Pete Alonso

        1
        Reply
        • stymeedone

          5 months ago

          Are you sure the Mets are still offering that much?

          1
          Reply
      • Mets Era Thumping Soto

        5 months ago

        The Rays would have jumped all over this deal.

        1
        Reply
        • MikeSadek3333

          5 months ago

          Yes they would—and trade him as soon as he got to the 10 million a year mark!!!

          2
          Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        5 months ago

        @Don. The A’s need to establish an identity. Now they have a star player and household name to open up Sacramento and Vegas (especially). The Rays don’t share the same sense of urgency.

        1
        Reply
  24. James Midway

    5 months ago

    Good move for both. So Rooker will be on the scoreboard in the new stadium just like in the rendering.

    1
    Reply
  25. TrillionaireTeamOperator

    5 months ago

    The irony that the so-called Quadruple-A’s are finally kinda sorta handing out big league sized deals while they play the next 3 seasons in an actual minor league ball park is just chef’s kiss bewildering.

    Kinda frustrating that they’re finally operating on a budget that looks and feels like an actual major league club, but they still hand out oddly bloated contracts to players that aren’t really worthy of them. I think back to when one of the biggest deals they ever doled out was 3 years/$21M to Esteban Loaiza- now, granted, pitchers with Loaiza’s numbers at that point in time regularly get like 2 years/$32M or 3 years/$60M nowadays, but back then even $7M a year for a guy like him was obscene.

    I just… wish they’d operate like a normal mid market major league club.

    4
    Reply
    • dezpoo

      5 months ago

      Like what a few people have said, their payroll needs to hit a floor to maximize their revenue sharing. They are pretty far from it still so they def need to make some splurges. They will still need to probably spend another $20-30M to hit it.

      Reply
  26. ClevelandSteelEngines

    5 months ago

    One-two years and trade. Rooker had a fantastic ’24, but there are a lot factors that’ll need to line up for this run to continue.

    2
    Reply
    • Ducey

      5 months ago

      Agreed. No way he plays out his contract in an A’s uniform

      1
      Reply
  27. outinleftfield

    5 months ago

    Good signing. The A’s are now just a few million away from that magical $105 million payroll to keep the revenue sharing checks coming in.

    2
    Reply
    • dezpoo

      5 months ago

      I think more than a few millions … before this, I think they were sitting at like $55M? His salary this year won’t be much since he was still under control.

      Reply
      • outinleftfield

        5 months ago

        Before this signing they were at $83 million for CBT payroll. This puts them at $95 million. Just a few million away

        Reply
  28. bpskelly

    5 months ago

    He’s almost 30. Kudos for him to getting a real contract. And by MLB standards, it’s a bargain.

    If he mashes, he’s underpaid. If and when he declines, he’s not breaking the bank.

    And he and his family are set for life now. Good all around.

    3
    Reply
  29. stymeedone

    5 months ago

    Unless when they get to Vegas, he goes “Put it all on black!”

    Reply
  30. letitbelowenstein

    5 months ago

    A’s have done more than the O’s this off season. It’s like the Bizarro world MLB.

    Reply
    • Mets Era Thumping Soto

      5 months ago

      When have the Orioles ever spent much?

      Reply
    • Jbigz12

      5 months ago

      O’s have spent more money than the A’s on salaries next year during this offseason.

      Reply
  31. This one belongs to the Reds

    5 months ago

    Fisher found that wallet in El Segundo, apparently.

    Good move, A’s.

    2
    Reply
  32. tom brunanskys black sock

    5 months ago

    Good for him! Who would imagined this after watching how putrid he was the first month or so of last season. Good for him for persevering and kudos to the A’s for their stickwithitotude.

    Reply
  33. 28rings

    5 months ago

    Wow! great deal… I guess he’s happy in Oakland… I mean Vegas… I mean Sacramento

    Reply
  34. ron_karate

    5 months ago

    Those poor fans in Oakland. Suffering through years of neglect. Then once the team leaves management immediately opens the checkbook.

    1
    Reply
    • 2012orioles

      5 months ago

      That’s what I was about to say. Just another slap in the face. I’m sure most of them are still A’s fans (maybe I’m wrong on that) but a good chunk of fans feel this team abandoned them and want no part of it anymore

      1
      Reply
    • gbs42

      5 months ago

      They’re spending just enough to get their full revenue sharing payout, nothing more.

      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      5 months ago

      The “poor fans”? Oakland was plenty successful for most of this century. Even as recently as 2018/19, they won 97 games, and managed to draw a whopping 1.6M fans. That was good for #26 & #23 in attendance.

      Reply
    • Mets Era Thumping Soto

      5 months ago

      They didn’t spend with the intention of getting out of Oakland. It was the sole reason for not spending.

      Reply
  35. Mikenmn

    5 months ago

    You used the word “investment” twice, but we should be clear that what Oakland-LV-Sacramento is doing is “investing” revenue sharing money in order to keep it. It’s not like ownership is plunging in with their own cash. Kind of a tough thing to swallow for the folks (previously) back home. Philly A’s, KC A’s. Oakland A’s, now Taxpayer+Revenue Sharing A’s. I know, it’s just business, but if they had these plans they should have shared it. They didn’t spend in Oakland because they didn’t get free goods.

    1
    Reply
  36. Sabermetric Acolyte

    5 months ago

    Ok… so this has been kinda brought up. This year will they be called “Sacramento Athletics” or for some reason will they start using the Las Vegas moniker?

    Reply
    • gbs42

      5 months ago

      No city, just the A’s.

      2
      Reply
  37. gbs42

    5 months ago

    My guess at the breakdown:

    2025: $5M
    2026: $8M
    2027: $12M
    2028: $16M
    2029: $19M
    2030: $22M option

    Reply
    • gbs42

      5 months ago

      I missed the “$30M over the first 3 years” part. Definitely somewhat front-loaded given his predicted $5.1M arb salary, probably to help them get to $105M this year.

      2025: $8M
      2026: $10M
      2027: $12M
      2028: $14M
      2029: $16M
      2030: $22M option

      1
      Reply
  38. Acoss1331

    5 months ago

    Rooker played the smart move, this contract gives him both job security and a nice bag of money, especially for a guy that’s already 30.

    Reply
  39. zacharydmanprin

    5 months ago

    Rooker will also be playing home games at Sutter Health Field rather than the Oakland Coliseum. The Coliseum favors RH pull hitters (think Frank Thomas). Who knows how that AAA park is going to play?

    Reply
    • 2020vision

      5 months ago

      That minor league stadium will play in a way that gives someone like Jacob Wilson a legitimate shot at a batting title. Oakland Coliseum had too much foul territory for any A’s player to win one.

      1
      Reply
  40. dave 2

    5 months ago

    So… I guess the moral of the story is if you downgrade your stadium you’ll have money to spend on your team?

    Reply
    • Mlbfan78

      5 months ago

      No the moral of the story is the A’s had to spend money to avoid a grievance from the union, if that threat wasn’t on the table they wouldn’t be spending money like this.
      Basically they are forced to, if they want revenue sharing and to avoid that grievance filed.

      3
      Reply
      • dave 2

        5 months ago

        Well if they can do that in a minor league park and smaller market then the grievance must be legitimate.

        2
        Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          5 months ago

          So are you implying that MLB team owners aren’t actually cash flow negative except for a handful of them? Some of them *could* spend more out of their revenue-sharing checks as opposed to pocketing it entirely?

          Reply
  41. Old York

    5 months ago

    Good for Mr. Rooker and it’s not too greedy like some players.

    Reply
  42. The Saber-toothed Superfife

    5 months ago

    Sleeping Tigers
    Should have hired the Superfife!

    I am beginning to think Chris Illich is just not a Good Guy or a very nice person……

    Reply
  43. 2020vision

    5 months ago

    Who else guesses what the dollar amount is before seeing what’s reported; like guessing the line on a game before seeing the actual line? I only missed this one by $30million in real value and $15million in what the A’s would have offered. In other words, this is a bargain.

    1
    Reply
  44. HalosHeavenJJ

    5 months ago

    Good for Rooker. That’s life changing money.

    1
    Reply
  45. RicoD

    5 months ago

    Feels like a win win signing. Works well for what both parties are looking to achieve. Glad it worked out for them and hope Rooker continues his success.

    Reply
  46. energel

    5 months ago

    Fuc k ig no pirates trade.

    Reply
  47. energel

    5 months ago

    very cheap, great deal for las vegas

    Reply
  48. Dock_Elvis

    5 months ago

    Good for Rooker! Class guy. He stood in KC during BP when no one was really there in that awful 2023 season…and fed balls to my 10 year old by the dugout. Came and sought him out. He got a kick out of seeing my son try to handle them all. I think he left with 10 balls.

    3
    Reply
  49. rememberthecoop

    5 months ago

    I’m sure they want to avoid any punishment from the league, but man, the haul they could have gotten for Rooker & Miller!

    Reply
  50. rockingryan

    5 months ago

    The As remind me of a company that has a budget surplus and is just trying to spend it on anything as time is running out

    Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      5 months ago

      That sounds like the street I used to live on. It gets ripped up every two years for no good reason and re-paved at a snail’s pace. Use it or lose it.

      Reply
  51. MPrck

    5 months ago

    WOW ! Great signing he has real size and power. Last seasons dead ball really shown who has it, and who don’t. Moving out and up !

    1
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version