Headlines

  • Rockies Fire Bud Black
  • Cubs Promote Cade Horton
  • Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base
  • Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton
  • Mariners Claim Leody Taveras
  • Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Brandon Nimmo Limited By Right Knee Soreness

By Mark Polishuk | March 15, 2025 at 10:27am CDT

Brandon Nimmo played in his second Spring Training game on Thursday, serving the Mets’ designated hitter against the Red Sox.  It was Nimmo’s first on-field action in over a week, as right knee soreness and a gel injection to battle inflammation kept the outfielder on the sidelines.  The Mets were already taking Nimmo’s ramp-up slowly in a nod to the plantar fasciitis issue that bothered him for much of 2024, yet Nimmo told the New York Post’s Dan Martin and other reporters that his left foot is no longer much of a concern, or at least less of a concern than his knee.

In terms of what created the knee issue, Nimmo feels a swing adjustment he made this spring added some extra stress on his joint.  He also cited some longstanding MCL and cartilage damage based on a torn ACL Nimmo suffered 15 years ago when he was a high school football player.  While Nimmo has had plenty of injury problems during his baseball career, his right knee has been pretty stable until now.

At the moment, Nimmo said he is only able to run at about 80 percent of his normal level.  “For sure, there’s definitely still some soreness [and] still some pain when I get above those levels,” Nimmo said.  “We try to keep things at a controlled level of pain.  Up to a certain threshold is OK, but if you go much past that, then you do more damage than you’re trying to gain.”

The plan is for Nimmo to get into the “90-95 percent” range before he starts to focus on more high-impact outfield activity, beyond tracking balls and other light drills.  Anything less, and Nimmo feels he could be putting both his knee and the Mets’ outfield defense at risk.  In terms of overall readiness, both Nimmo and manager Carlos Mendoza were cautiously optimistic that Nimmo should be ready for Opening Day in at least a DH capacity.

The Mets have already been hit hard by injuries this spring, as Sean Manaea, Frankie Montas, Francisco Alvarez, and Jeff McNeil will all start the season on the injured list, and Nick Madrigal’s season has probably already been ended by shoulder surgery.  A DH-only version of Nimmo wouldn’t help with this lack of depth, though Jesse Winker or Tyrone Taylor could step into left field in the interim.  If Nimmo is limited just to DH, however, it could crowd Starling Marte out of more at-bats.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

New York Mets

Latest On Erik Swanson
Main
Brewers Considering Brice Turang At Shortstop, Joey Ortiz At Second Base
View Comments (57)
Post a Comment

57 Comments

  1. chandlerbing

    2 months ago

    Nimmo is a passionate player, always plays 150%

    But that contract is absolutely awful
    No way no how he’s worth 162 mil
    And mets barely
    Just barely gave pete 54?

    7
    Reply
    • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

      2 months ago

      Raise your hand if you knew it was a horrible contract the day it was signed. Uncle Steve may be a “fan” of baseball; but probably many of us here could spend his money more effectively and build a better roster.

      8
      Reply
      • geofft

        2 months ago

        Yeah, the length of this contract was always going to be a problem. And just to make things worse, he gave Nimmo full no trade protection from Day One, as well. when Nimmo was still three years and 130 days away from getting that through five-and-ten rights.
        Even Lindor wasn’t given that generous a no-trade clause.

        Reply
    • Drasco0366

      2 months ago

      Brandon Nimmo has made 41 million dollars and has given the Mets 55.5 million in value already and yet, it’s a horrible contract? Interesting opinion.

      13
      Reply
      • please disperse

        2 months ago

        I think the concern is the 8 years and value over the entire time vs a couple of years

        8
        Reply
        • please disperse

          2 months ago

          Not to mention giving an 8 year deal to a guy who at that point had played over 100 games maybe 2 times in his career

          8
          Reply
      • Mets Era Thumping Soto

        2 months ago

        He hasn’t given 55.5 million in value. Not even close.

        5
        Reply
        • geofft

          2 months ago

          Do you have a basis, Mets Era, or is that just your opinion.
          Just to catch you up, Fangraphs has determined (or decided) that 1 WAR is worth approximately $8 million (though that number is moving). Nimmo has posted a 6.9 fWAR over the past two seasons since signing that contract.
          If you don’t agree with Fangraph’s methodology, there’s certainly a discussion to be had there. But at least we know the basis for Drascoo’s statement.

          8
          Reply
        • Drasco0366

          2 months ago

          Guess I just pulled that number out of my rear, huh?

          6
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          2 months ago

          8 million a year isn’t across the board. Higher WAR players will get more than that. Nobody is paying 8 million a year for a 1 WAR player. Iglesias just had a nearly 4 WAR year and got a minor league deal. I don’t know why you are under the assumption that most teams use WAR to determine salaries. It’s a small piece of information that is used and the value of it has varying degrees of importance by organization.

          1
          Reply
        • Drasco0366

          2 months ago

          I get most Americans do not know the definition of words but maybe you should look up what “value” means.

          4
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          2 months ago

          I think you are looking at a flawed way of looking at salaries. You are under the assumption of every WAR being equal. There is a drastic difference between a 5+ WAR player and a 2 WAR player. 2 WAR players are fairly common and easily replaceable. 5+WAR players are not. Paying a player 8 million a year for a one WAR would be absurd.

          3
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          2 months ago

          Why are you on an American website if you think you are smarter than Americans? I guess your country doesn’t know the “value” of creating your own content.

          2
          Reply
        • Patriot12992

          2 months ago

          That random personal attack kinda ruins your argument. I get what fangraphs is trying to do with that evaluation but it is no doubt a flawed metric.

          That being said Nimmo is way more important to the mets than people realize. He is the straw that stirs the drink.

          2
          Reply
        • DanzigInTheDark

          2 months ago

          It still sounds like you’re undervaluing Nimmo here, then, even if you don’t agree with FG’s WAR value calculations. Over his career, he’s averaged 4.4 fWAR/162 GP, and since 2020 he’s only missed significant time once (2021) – he played 55 out of 60 games in 2020, and since 2022 he’s played 151, 152, and 151 games. So very clearly he’s been a 4-5 WAR player before and after signing the contract, and as you say, that type of guy is not easily replaceable and worth a fair amount of salary.

          4
          Reply
        • Ma4170

          2 months ago

          $20m a year for an OF isnt very much, and in four years it will feel like even less. Marte making $19M and giving very little and far less than nimmo. Nimmo a bargain so far on the deal. My concern is whether these foot and knee issues will keep him from playing at a high level next two years when mets are hoping for significant contributions. After that he’ll be 34 and they know his value will diminish.

          1
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          2 months ago

          Marte’s contract was a drastic over pay too.

          1
          Reply
        • geofft

          2 months ago

          I’m not under any assumption about how teams evaluate salaries, and I said nothing to defend or support the use of WAR. In fact, I specifically said, “If you don’t agree with Fangraph’s methodology, there’s certainly a discussion to be had there.” All I said was that we know where drascoo (right or wrong) got his evaluation. And I asked you to clarify the basis for yours. And yet here, many hours and argumentative posts later, we still don’t know where you get yours.
          So I’m now left to assume that the answer to my question is: No, you do not have a basis for your evaluation.

          2
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          2 months ago

          My evaluation of a player is over paid is what a better player or equivalent is getting in free agency. With Santander and Profar getting a lot less, then I think Nimmo is over pain

          Reply
      • VonPurpleHayes

        2 months ago

        It’s weird because he had a significant injury history before the contract. And the latter years may not look so great. But really, that doesn’t matter. The Mets expected that.

        1
        Reply
        • Drasco0366

          2 months ago

          If it wasn’t for the injury history, Nimmo would have made a lot more in free agency.

          1
          Reply
    • Lou Sassoll

      2 months ago

      Is this a haiku?

      4
      Reply
      • Gwynning

        2 months ago

        Here’s one, Lou!

        Seven Six Five Juan
        Very Expensive DH
        Flounders in the field

        9
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          2 months ago

          Haikus for $100 Alex:

          See Brandon Nimmo
          Nimmo is always injured
          Cohen paid too much

          7
          Reply
        • Lee Harvey Oddball

          2 months ago

          150+ games 3 years in a row. Wrong again.

          1
          Reply
    • ctbronx7

      2 months ago

      How many more years does the Nimmo contract run? IIRC, it’s four meaning 2029. That’s Cashman-esque.

      Reply
      • geofft

        2 months ago

        It runs through 2030. Plus he has full no-trade protection. So even if Cohen wanted to eat the money and trade him, he can’t without Nimmo’s approval.

        Reply
      • chandlerbing

        2 months ago

        @bronx
        6 more yrs on his deal

        Reply
    • Mets411

      2 months ago

      Petes wife….. is that you?

      Reply
    • Show all 28 replies
  2. DanzigInTheDark

    2 months ago

    If Nimmo has to play DH for a spell while he gets the knee up to speed, I would just move the Winker/Marte platoon from DH to LF. Definitely a bit of a downgrade defensively but if it’s short-term you shouldn’t really see too much of a negative impact.

    9
    Reply
    • Mets&SkenesFan

      2 months ago

      I think that is the solution @ Danzig. I would add one more out of the box solution. Taylor is coming off surgeries this winter. He needs time to get back his swing. He is having a terrible spring. I would send him through waivers and out right him so he can get his stuff together in Syracuse. I don’t think he will get claimed nor will he pass on his nice 3 million 4th outfielder salary. Keep Azocar who is absolutely tearing it up this spring and is out of options for late inning defense and plug in for the inevitable Marte injury.

      2
      Reply
      • phenomenalajs

        2 months ago

        Out of the box thinking, but I don’t see the Mets doing that with Taylor.

        4
        Reply
      • geofft

        2 months ago

        There is no world in which Taylor goes unclaimed. And no world in which the Mets send him down while Nimmo is hurt. You’re putting far too much emphasis on spring results. Especiall early spring. Let’s keep watching and let’s see what Azocar does the rest of the way.

        3
        Reply
        • Mets&SkenesFan

          2 months ago

          @ Geoff If the Mets were so high on Taylor from last year they would have not got Siri. I see Taylor as a non tender in the near future. Teams will think more then twice about a once traded,non starter, coming off 2 major surgeries, with an ops of .450 with a week left in spring training games guaranteed 3 million. Azocar is controlled for years and is a better defender and runner. Mets fans need to think about things more then being emotional.Azocar is a surprise gift and will be plucked if they pass him through waivers

          Reply
    • geofft

      2 months ago

      First off, let me say that you’re posts are my favorites to read, Danzig. Always on point, sensible, astute, and backed up by fact and reason.
      That said, I’m seeing things a bit differently on this one. Its actually a huge downgrade defensively. Too much to use every day.
      I think its more likely that they use a variety of solutions and a rotation of players that also involves Taylor in LF and Siri in CF some, if not most days.
      The wild card is McNeil’s injury. Had he been healthy, he could’ve played LF some days, with the reserve infielders (whoever they may be) getting some time at 2B. We’ll see how long he’s out.
      Now we’re left wondering. Do these injuries prompt the Mets to keep Acuna, simply because he has also played some CF and can provide some depth? And if they do, does he play 2B exclusively? Or does he get some time in the OF?
      It’ll be interesting to see how Stearns and Mendoza move the pieces around on this one.

      3
      Reply
      • DanzigInTheDark

        2 months ago

        I completely agree that you’ll be seeing more Tyrone Taylor regardless of how they set the lineup – even if they want to use the Winkler/Marte platoon primarily in LF while Nimmo DHs, Taylor is going to be coming off the bench in close games to shore up the defense.

        I’ll be honest – I knew Winker was not great defensively but looked at his OAA numbers and -woof-. I think if he’s starting in LF you’re bringing in Taylor in the 5th or 6th inning of a close one, lol. Marte I think might pick up a little bit of value playing LF over RF – he was generally a plus fielder by OAA before coming to the Mets, and he had never played RF in the majors before that. There might be a correlation there, and pushing him down the defensive spectrum a little bit might let those numbers bounce back up some.

        I’m thinking that both Acuña and Baty make the OD roster with McNeil hurt; they can be a platoon at 2B with Acuña coming in for defense on days Baty starts and getting the occasional run in CF if they think his glove is up to it.

        Gonna be an interesting first month for the Mets – I’m hoping this is just getting the injury bug out of the way early and giving some bench guys a chance to develop into better pieces, but we’ll see. And truly appreciate your kind words – I’ll throw them right back at ya, you’re a poster in these parts whose opinions I always enjoy reading.

        3
        Reply
    • JackStrawb

      2 months ago

      @DanzigInTheDark Sorry, but that’s an awful idea. Both Marte and Winker were among the very worst corner OFers in MLB in 2024, and now they’re one more year removed from their primes.

      By range Winker was in the bottom 1 percentile. Marte was in the bottom 5th percentile. They were unplayable at 30 and 35. Now they’re 31 and 36.

      The impact will be huge.

      —Even Brett Baty in LF would be better. At least there’s upside.

      1
      Reply
  3. Gwynning

    2 months ago

    In before metsin4 argues (with backwards logic) that this makes “his” team so much better…

    6
    Reply
  4. Old York

    2 months ago

    Biomechanical risk ignored. Swing mechanics directly affect lower-body stress, particularly on weight-bearing joints like the knees, hips, and ankles.

    Most MLB teams focus on upper-body swing tweaks (e.g., launch angle, bat path) without accounting for their lower-body impact.

    Reply
    • Gwynning

      2 months ago

      That’s very presumptive again, Yorkie! Lower body is worked just as much, but keep going… we’ll call you Butter today because you’re on a roll!

      2
      Reply
      • Old York

        2 months ago

        @Gwynning

        Look, it’s not that they’re ignoring his legs. It’s that they’re looking at his knees and ankles like they’re separate pieces of a puzzle, not like they’re all connected. Imagine you’re building a tower with blocks. If you only check if each block is strong enough on its own, you might miss that the whole tower is wobbly.

        They’re changing how he swings, right? But they’re not really checking how that change makes his whole body move together. So, his knee ends up taking a beating, even though they thought they were being careful. They’re missing the big picture, basically. They need to see how all the pieces work together, not just one at a time.

        Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 months ago

          “It’s that they’re looking at his knees and ankles like they’re separate pieces of a puzzle… etc. Etc.”

          How do you know this? Just curious.

          1
          Reply
        • Old York

          2 months ago

          @Gwynning

          if teams were really looking at how the whole body works together when they change a player’s swing, we’d see proof of it. Right? We’d see studies, we’d see players getting hurt less, we’d see them playing better.

          But we don’t. We just see guys getting hurt, and everyone scratching their heads. So, it’s not that I know they’re not doing it, it’s that there’s no proof they are doing it. If they had this amazing way to see how everything connects, they’d be shouting it from the rooftops, right? Because then they’d be winning more.

          Basically, if it existed, we’d know about it. And we don’t.”

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 months ago

          I’m retired now, Yorkie… but when I played, nobody kept their body in better shape than me. I could do cardio all day, my whip was strong and my core was solid. I still got hurt, nagged by muscular injuries, or felt general soreness which could lead to worse if I wasn’t careful. Serious injuries (IL worthy or worse…) were always the result of a freak occurance, not because myself or my trainers weren’t doing something properly.

          Reply
        • Old York

          2 months ago

          @Gwynning

          Maybe, as I said, we should be investing in studies of how these changes impact their overall health as well. I think teams have a long-term interest in keeping some of their players they’ve invested in, on the field. Maybe back in the 1950s, teams didn’t really care about that, but the money wasn’t as big as it is today.

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 months ago

          And I’m telling you that those studies exist ad nauseum. Players still get hurt, and unfortunately, always will. You just can’t prevent them all, bar none.

          2
          Reply
        • Old York

          2 months ago

          @Gwynning

          Which studies? Do you have a few studies to share?

          1
          Reply
        • Old York

          2 months ago

          @Gwynning

          You’re right that injuries, especially freak occurrences, will always happen in sports. But the crux of the issue is not whether injuries can be prevented entirely—because, as you said, they can’t be. It’s about how teams approach injury prevention, and whether current methods are truly optimizing player longevity and performance.

          Studies may exist on injury prevention, but the type of data we need is holistic and incorporates biomechanics across the entire kinetic chain, not just isolated muscle groups or individual joint functions. For example, we need to analyze how mechanical adjustments in one part of the body (say, a swing change) affect other areas in real-time, over time. This isn’t just about keeping a player strong or well-conditioned—it’s about understanding how every motion in the swing, from the lower body to the core, translates into stress on the joints and muscles, and how this affects long-term health.

          The key point is: there’s no clear, publicly available proof that teams are systematically analyzing the entire body’s response to swing adjustments. If this were happening, we’d likely see fewer injuries associated with mechanical changes, more players staying healthy longer, and perhaps even higher performance metrics across the board.

          If these studies exist in the way you’re suggesting, they haven’t translated into a breakthrough for injury reduction at the professional level yet—at least, not in a way that’s widely communicated or applied. The answer isn’t that it’s impossible to prevent injuries, but rather that the current focus might be too narrow, and more comprehensive, integrated biomechanical studies could yield better results.

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 months ago

          I’m driving so I’ll keep this short. Do I have studies to share? Not by links, no. My experience was literal safety meetings with MGMT and kinesiology reports from trainers where they would break down your performance (running, gait, camber, torque, oxygen expended, etc.) Ironically, look up “METS” and see how that plays into the bigger picture. (Stands for somethinh like Metabolic Equivalent/Replacement or something of the like…)
          Anyhow, we were inundated with a statistical overload essentially telling us how to move. We still got hurt. Later man!

          1
          Reply
        • Old York

          2 months ago

          @Gwynning

          So, they’re measuring how a guy runs, how he twists, all that stuff. That’s great. But it’s like having a bunch of puzzle pieces without knowing how they fit together.

          They’re looking at each piece, but they’re not seeing how changing his swing changes how all those pieces move together. That’s why guys still get hurt. They’re missing the big picture.

          It’s not that they’re not doing anything. It’s that they’re not doing the right thing. They need to see how the whole body works as one big machine, not just a bunch of parts.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          2 months ago

          Your “evidence” that they aren’t taking a holistic approach is ridiculous. Injuries aren’t coming down so they aren’t doing it. Cmon. You’re taking a result that you’re convinced in and working backwards. For professionals working at that level there is no valid reason to believe they aren’t exploring every connection using every tool that medical and sports science provides. The results not going the way I expect is not evidence they aren’t doing it.

          2
          Reply
        • JackStrawb

          2 months ago

          @foppert3 Agreed. It’s ludicrous to think that baseball teams, incredibly incentivized to minimize injuries, particularly to stars, teams that were already in the 1970s looking into ballet and yoga to improve player flexibility, are ignoring an holistic approach to player health for no particular reason.

          Reply
  5. Al Hirschen

    2 months ago

    You know what happened to old yeller!!!play the young blood

    Reply
  6. Never Remember

    2 months ago

    Well hopefully he’ll stop running like a child to first after a walk. He is so annoying.

    Reply
    • letsgooakland123

      2 months ago

      No, that’s kinda cool and it’s part of the reason he has a reputation as a team player and hard worker.

      7
      Reply
  7. bbgods

    2 months ago

    Winker in LF, Nimmo at DH vs. RHP
    Marte in LF, Nimmo at DH vs. LHP

    Not good defense, but the lineup stays exactly the same.

    1
    Reply
  8. alproof

    2 months ago

    Get rid of this .227 cream puff already. Mauricio LF, Gilbert CF, Soto RF.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Rockies Fire Bud Black

Cubs Promote Cade Horton

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

Ross Stripling Retires

Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

Angels Place Mike Trout On 10-Day Injured List

Rangers Option Jake Burger

Tigers Designate Kenta Maeda For Assignment

Reds Option Alexis Diaz

Orioles Move Charlie Morton To Bullpen

MLBTR Live Chat

Rockies Fire Bud Black

Latest On Blake Snell

Cubs Sign Tommy Romero To Minor League Deal

Orioles Activate Zach Eflin

Jose Altuve Exits Due To Hamstring Tightness

Rockies Select Ryan Rolison, Transfer Kris Bryant To 60-Day IL

Giants Notes: Hicks, Encarnacion, First Base

Mets Among Teams To Show Recent Interest In Luis Robert Jr.

Brewers Option Tobias Myers

ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
  • Nolan Arenado Rumors
  • Dylan Cease Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Marcus Stroman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
  • 2025 Arbitration Projections
  • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

ad: 160x600_MLB

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version