Headlines

  • Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension
  • Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin
  • Cubs Sign Hunter Harvey
  • Marlins Sign Pete Fairbanks
  • Pirates To Sign Ryan O’Hearn
  • White Sox Sign Sean Newcomb
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On Red Sox’ Pursuits

By Darragh McDonald | November 14, 2025 at 3:25pm CDT

The Red Sox are considering adding a high-leverage reliever to bolster their bullpen, according to reporting from Ken Rosenthal, Will Sammon and Katie Woo of The Athletic. That aligns with recent reporting from Sammon that the Sox are interesting in Devin Williams. Chief baseball officer Craig Breslow acknowledged this possibility, per Alex Speier of The Boston Globe, but maintained that the rotation is a bigger priority.

“We can do a better job of preventing other teams from scoring. There are a bunch of different ways to do that. We’ll be open-minded about all of them,” said Breslow. “The most straightforward is building out a better starting rotation. I’ve talked a bunch about that. Another way is to continue to improve our infield defense, and another is to make sure that when our starters hand the ball to our relievers, any leads that we have we’re preserving. So, I think we’ll look at it from all angles, but I think our priority remains starting pitching and position players.”

The Sox had one of the best bullpens in baseball in 2025. Their collective 3.41 earned run average was second only to the Padres. A lot of that was thanks to Aroldis Chapman being almost unhittable but they also got good results from guys like Garrett Whitlock, Greg Weissert and Brennan Bernardino, who are all slated to be back in 2025. Per The Athletic, the idea would be to add to an area of the roster that is already a strength to create a super bullpen, while keeping Chapman in the closer’s role.

That is one way they could go but Breslow has been pretty open about his desire to target a front-of-rotation arm and a middle-of-the-order bat. As with any baseball executive, it’s possible there’s some gamesmanship at play, but the rotation and the lineup are logical targets for Boston. Their rotation has a clearcut ace in Garrett Crochet but the other options are either uninspiring or unproven. The lineup has a lot of talent but they lost Rafael Devers and Alex Bregman in the past few months, so adding another bopper makes sense.

A baseball offseason can be unpredictable, so it’s understandable that Breslow would be open to pivoting as things change, but it’s probably fair to expect bullpen to be a lesser priority. Dylan Cease, Framber Valdez, Tatsuya Imai, Ranger Suárez, Michael King and Brandon Woodruff are some of the notable starters out there in free agency. MacKenzie Gore, Sonny Gray and Brady Singer could be available on the trade market. Bregman, Pete Alonso, Kyle Schwarber, Munetaka Murakami and Eugenio Suárez are some of the big free agent bats, with Taylor Ward and Adolis García some of the speculative trade candidates.

If the Sox eventually decide they do want to make a splash on the bullpen, they likely wouldn’t go after Edwin Díaz, with Chapman already in the closer’s role. Other notable free agent relievers include Williams, Ryan Helsley, Brad Keller, Robert Suarez, Raisel Iglesias, Kyle Finnegan, Luke Weaver, Tyler Rogers, Seranthony Domínguez and Pete Fairbanks. Some of the notable trade candidates include JoJo Romero, Jose A. Ferrer and Victor Vodnik.

RosterResource projects the club for a payroll of $180MM next year, with a competitive balance tax number of $216MM. They finished last year with a $207MM payroll and $245MM CBT number. Assuming they plan on spending at a similar level in 2026, they have a little more than $20MM in wiggle room but it’s possible their postseason finish in 2025 prompts them to take things up a notch.

Photo courtesy of Jerome Miron, Imagn Images

Share Repost Send via email

Boston Red Sox

Legends Memorabilia – One Stop Shop for Collectors and Fans! (Sponsored)
Main
Reds, Tejay Antone Agree To Minor League Deal
View Comments (167)
Post a Comment

167 Comments

  1. vaderzim

    2 months ago

    Darragh, do you proof read these articules?

    3
    Reply
    • vaderzim

      2 months ago

      Nevermind, I don’t even proof read my own comments…

      39
      Reply
      • Canuckleball

        2 months ago

        Foisted on your own petard

        12
        Reply
        • Wbh311

          2 months ago

          AFE?

          Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        1 month ago

        I do love the headline, though. It’s somewhat Dickensian.

        1
        Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        1 month ago

        Vaderzim- hilarious! Sometimes we just get caught up in the moment

        2
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – At least he came back and provided a “My bad”, rather than running and hiding like so many others here do when they are proven wrong.

          4
          Reply
        • Butters

          1 month ago

          Not sure he was proven wrong as much as he proved how irony works. 😉

          4
          Reply
      • Enregistre

        1 month ago

        But you’re a commenter, not a writer. You’re not expected to proofread comments the way a pro is supposed to do so with their articles. “The Red Sox are interesting in Devin Williams” should have been fixed.

        1
        Reply
      • rememberthecoop

        1 month ago

        I’m available to Pruf-reed articules and commence if any won interesting.

        2
        Reply
    • Jswag

      1 month ago

      Feels AI-ish actually

      Reply
      • Baltimore_44

        1 month ago

        Definitely not AI. AI uses odd sounded language not really flat out incorrect ones. Don’t see an em dash in here either. Just a mistake by the writer.

        Reply
    • rememberthecoop

      1 month ago

      None of them seem to do so Ive been saying they could use an editor. Alternatively, an approach I developed when I was a leading a website’s Chicago division is we had each writer take turns reviewing each other’s work. That way we didn’t have to pay for a full or part-time editor and it worked well. All you need is a second pair of eyes to find obvious mistakes like “Sox are interesting in Devin Williams…”.

      1
      Reply
      • Baltimore_44

        1 month ago

        I don’t think they always have 2 writers on at the same time.

        Reply
      • JoeBrady

        1 month ago

        My guess is that mistake was a result of editing. Most people wouldn’t write like that. But a lot of people will edit their own work, change a snippet, but forget to re-read their work in full.

        1
        Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Coop – Most of the writers here are near-perfect, I am serious when I say the longtimers like Darragh, Steve, Mark and Tim combined make no errors 99% of the time. They truly do an excellent job, even with the huge amount of content.

        Keep in mind they are trying to keep costs down, that’s why they don’t have an editor or even moderators. As to your suggestion for them to review each other’s work, I don’t see how that’s possible without it negatively impacting the content.

        To me the errors are a non-issue for nearly all the writers. Sure I notice the few that occur, but I simply don’t care and I think most others here feel the same way. These guys gotta have SOME semblance of a personal life. They work hard, that is abundantly clear.

        3
        Reply
  2. C5793l

    2 months ago

    Should trade the password and perales plus a comp pick to Milwaukee for Peralta and McGill

    1
    Reply
    • Russell Branyan

      2 months ago

      OF is pretty deep in Milwaukee, I dont think Garcia moves the needle as much for them as he would for other teams.
      For Milwaukee to move Peralta, I think its going to take a young hitter that improves the lineup day 1, especially a lefty w slug, and a prospect or 2
      I dont think any team is going to pay what it would take, and that probably isnt the overpay to get it done

      2
      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        1 month ago

        Russell – first let me say, i’m a big fan of your movies.
        Second, I think there is probably a workable deal there involving a Sox OF’er. Chourio and Frelich are keepers, but the Collins-Perkins platoon is definitely not as good as say Jarren Duran

        1
        Reply
        • Russell Branyan

          1 month ago

          I like Boston as a destination for Peralta, just dont think Garcia is as valuable to them as to other teams. Milwaukee has a boatload of CF options, Chourio, Frelick, Mitchell, Perkins, and Lara knocking on the door.
          Any trade that would get it done though, is likely one you and other Red Sox fans wouldnt like.

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          R.B. – I agree, I dont think the Sox can get Peralta on their terms and ultimately aren’t going to be a match.
          Anyway, it may be moot. Looks like the Brewers were trying to downplay his availability

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – It’s certainly possible Milwaukee will hold onto him, but they’ve proven they aren’t afraid to trade top players even when they are in a window of contention.

          I think the Sox do want to contend next season, which means they’ll have to either meet a top free agent pitcher’s asking price or meet a team’s asking price in a trade. I think the trade scenario is more likely.

          3
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          1 month ago

          Fever- It doesn’t seem like any of the available free agent pitchers are going to fit into the #2 slot, more 3-5. The most appealing are the potential trade candidates if they can pull off a big trade. In most cases they would also need to get them signed to a long term contract to be worth what they will need to give up.

          I am not very patient and I know we have a ways to go before the offseason action kicks in. Just going to need to hope for the best.

          2
          Reply
        • kingbum

          1 month ago

          Well you got the right team in mind but wrong guy. I don’t think Boston should trade any prospects, just sign Brandon Woodruff he’d make a great #2.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          bum – He hasn’t pitched more than 67 innings since 2022.

          I think it’s time to start acquiring pitchers without concerning injury histories, guys who can give a lot of quality innings.

          And not all prospects can be promoted. Even if KC remains in the infield, where would someone like Password play? He’s not moving Roman, Rafaela and both of Duran/Abreu.

          3
          Reply
        • kingbum

          1 month ago

          @FPG….There’s not many pitchers in baseball these days that doesn’t spend time injured. That is why you need rotation depth. I say if ya sign a Woodruff on a incentive based deal and keep a Tolle in AAA as an insurance policy it’s a winning formula. You will get the prospect experience from pitching him when Woodruff is hurt and you’d get some innings from him. I’d sign Woodruff get back Giolito and call it a day as far as the rotation goes. Boston needs a big bat more than anything. They need a guy that’s gonna hit 35+ homers to knock in these contact hitters. I think Anthony will eventually be that guy but he needs a partner.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          bum – I hear what you’re saying, but I kinda agree with Breslow on this …… he says they’ve got plenty of guys to fill the #3-#11 slots on the SP depth chart, what they need is a solid #2.

          Freddy has averaged 32 starts over the past 3 seasons, Woodruff has averaged 11 starts over the same 3-year period. I don’t see how a team with WS aspirations can take a chance on a guy like that.

          I agree with you on the bat. Once Roman starts hitting for more power, will they leave him in leadoff? I hope not with Rafaela and his career .284 OBP batting in front of Roman.

          2
          Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      1 month ago

      C57931 – I would love to have Peralta as well. Seems like Brewers are walking his availability back, or, positioning the trade for an overpay. If I have to overpay I’d rather overpay for two yrs of Alcantara than one yr of Peralta.

      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Sad – You said the exact opposite of me! LOL!!

        True the additional year holds some value, but I really wanted to see at last one strong month out of Alcantara to prove he’s back …. and he couldn’t provide that. So Freddy seems like the more sure bet to me.

        5
        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          FPG – I actually watched some of Sandy’s august and sept starts. He looked really good, control was back and velocity was increasing. I think he is poised to have a great 2026. I like Peralta because hes cheap and only a one year rental.
          If I were in charge I would trade with a playoff ready type team like Milwaukee, Seattle or Cleveland where I can use Duran as the centerpiece and keep all our current top prospects. Sign a bat in free agency for dollars only.
          Then in 2027 I assemble all of our AAA, AA and High A players in a ballroom and introduce them to their new GM, Ben Cherington and drive Skenes home to Fenway.
          By the way, if Sonny Gray wanted to waive his no trade, and all it cost was most of his salary and a low level prospect, I wouldn’t hang up the phone

          1
          Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      1 month ago

      STEVE – think the Astros will give ut back?

      Reply
  3. Fever Pitch Guy

    2 months ago

    I don’t see why the Sox would not sign a 31-year-old Diaz to a 4-year deal just because they have a 38-year-old closer signed for just next season. If the Sox really like Diaz and are willing to pay the man, then sign him and make Sugar/Missile co-closers for one year.

    They should be focusing on infield and starting pitching right now though.

    9
    Reply
    • rocky7

      2 months ago

      Got news for you…..your “missile” doesn’t play second fiddle to anyone….co-closers would bring out the guy the Yankees dumped…he’s got a HUGE ego and no massaging will make that work….

      8
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        1 month ago

        Rocky, thumb’s up on your comment. If Williams’s is willing to become a non-closure, I like that idea. Truth be told, until we see fancy free agents signing in Boston, I will still think it’s nonsense as Henry is not likely to approve a contract that will outspend Cohen. Such applies to both Diaz and Alonso. He’ll overpay on short term deals but not veterans as they age. Go back into history and look how he treated Papi and Varitek. The game has changed but Henry seems more willing to extend unproven but talented rookies before they truly make it to the top than proven players likely on the decline. I can’t fault him most times on this but the fan base deserves consistency. Hopefully he opens up the payroll for more than just Bregman (who I would not sign for more than four years unless the extra years averaged out to a significant lesser AAV).

        1
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          dewey – If Williams gets the 4-year or 5-year contract he is seeking, you really think it would matter to him if he is not the fulltime closer for just the first year of the contract? It wouldn’t impact him in any way.

          3
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          1 month ago

          Dewey- Besides the strikeouts, Williams numbers from last year don’t look very impressive. Obviously he must have more of an upside than his numbers indicate. Why would you see him as a good fit.

          Completely agree about Bregman, definitely nothing above 3-4 years. I have a feeling someone will overpay for him. There is a lot to like about him, but not sure he will be worth the contract he gets.

          They need another Papi type player who can provide power to the lineup and be someone the fans will get excited about for years to come.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Uncle – What underlying numbers of Williams are you looking at from last year that aren’t impressive? I mean 1.25 ERA, 0.969 WHIP are hardly unimpressive! Granted he threw only 22 innings, if it’s the back injury then I totally understand your concern about that.

          I agree with you on Bregman. It’s a very weak free agent market, especially for left side of the infield. And with the potential lockout looming, teams will want to lock up targeted players longterm now because who knows what the new CBA will look like (I don’t think there will be a salary cap, it will probably just be much more severe CBT penalties).

          I also agree the Sox need another Ortiz/Devers type player, Breslow said as much recently. If you don’t have otherworldly pitching, you need clutch sluggers. We saw that yet again in this year’s postseason.

          3
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          1 month ago

          Fever- Are we talking about Devin Williams who is mentioned in the article? I clicked on the link in the article and his ERA is listed as 4.79 and he has a -0.3 WAR. Those did not look good to me.

          Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        rocky – Yankees dumped? I thought the reason Yankee fans hate him so much is because HE walked out on the Yankees?

        Well the Red Sox managed his workload very carefully this season, he pitched more than one inning only once all year and that was a 5-out appearance.

        He also pitched 7 times in the 8th inning and even pitched in the 7th inning once, with zero complaints from him.

        I’m not trying to deny what you said about his Yankee days, but I think you should consider the fact it’s 3 years later and maybe he matured more since then. Nothing stays the same, remember the knock on him was he had zero control? Obviously that wasn’t the case this season.

        And everyone knows Cora loves matchups, he would absolutely love having a RH closer to complement Chapman. As Darragh accurately pointed out in the article, the Red Sox could build a “super bullpen” now that they realize the importance of preserving leads. It’s the #1 reason the Sox made the postseason this year.

        With that said, I’m not sold on Williams and his ability to rebound from the 2025 season.

        7
        Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      2 months ago

      They may have promised Chapman the closer role. He is trying to accumulate counting stats for the hall.

      1
      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        1 month ago

        Wade – we all know that Red Sox management promises one thing to players and then lies about it, so, if they want to sign Diaz and make him the closer, we’ll be trading Chapman in June

        2
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – Very true about Sox management lying all the time, but I don’t see foresee a Chapman trade unless the team falls out of contention early on.

          3
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Fpg – I was mostly kidding. That said, if they told Chapman hes the closer and go out and sign another closer and give him the save opportunities Chapman would be as pissed and petulant as Raffy was last year.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – In that scenario he’d have a right to be pissed because he’s on just a one-year contract now.

          But did they actually come out and tell him that?

          3
          Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Wade – If he were to retire today, he’d be in the HOF.

        8-time all-star
        367 saves
        14.6 career K/9
        1.075 career WHIP

        He is the one who changed the game with his velo, I’ve pointed that out many times in the past. When he threw a pitch 105.8 MPH in 2010, the league-wide obsession with high velo soon followed as K rates increased.

        3
        Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      1 month ago

      Diaz is probably going to want 5 years and be exclusively a closer.

      1
      Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      1 month ago

      FPG- if you remember last off season Breslow jumped out early and signed relievers. I wouldn’t be surprised if he did it again, but like you, I’d rather keep the cash for impacting position player signings and fill out the bullpen after

      2
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Sad – I think he jumped out early because he had absolutely no luck signing any other type of player. All his SP targets and position player targets came off the board.

        3
        Reply
    • thereal19

      1 month ago

      Re-sign Bregman for 5/$30-32M/yr, and do the same for Pete Alonso as well. Go get Cease for 4/$88-92M. Or, trade Casas, Criswell, a “quality middle infielder” in the high minors (Arias, etc.), and ptbnl for Ryan from Twins if a deal with Cease can’t be done.
      If Bregman or Alonso can’t be done, try to trade for Marte from the Dbacks. Just add Yoshida in it to “offset” some money with the same guys I stated for Ryan above.

      Reply
  4. This one belongs to the Reds

    2 months ago

    I got an image of Roscoe saying “we’re in hot pursuit!” for some reason…

    6
    Reply
    • Joe says...

      1 month ago

      So the Red Sox are after them Duke boys.

      4
      Reply
  5. simonkiller

    2 months ago

    SP2 & RH bat

    5
    Reply
  6. alan.kawadler@verizon.net 2

    2 months ago

    Please do not sign Bregman; spend that money on Alonso. As far as offense is concerned, there is no comparison. Schwarber at DH. Marcelo Mayer at 3rd, trade for a starting pitcher, and sign a high-end reliever. They will go over the second tier, but so what?

    4
    Reply
    • WCSoxFan

      2 months ago

      Alonso is fool’s gold imo. Take a look at his 2023-2024 (age 28-29) stats:
      .229/.324/.480 – 121 wRC+

      Now look at another much more available and cheaper option 2023-2024:
      .256/.357/.480 – 128 wRC+

      Neither are good fielders and the 2nd guy currently has a health concern but he’s also more than 5 years younger. If Alonso was a GG fielder I’d feel a bit differently, but loading up on DHs is not the way.

      The Red Sox can likely sign both Alonso and Schwarber, but that would be pretty much it in terms of payroll (unlikely to get the high-end reliever and the starter better be cheap!) and in 2-3 years I think we’d all be regretting those moves.

      3
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        1 month ago

        The team could easily afford both and more but Henry won’t release his grip on the purse. That said, i wouldn’t sign either to more than four years unless the extra years lowered the AAV or were team options. Realistically, both I believe are going back to their last teams. It’s weird this year as I also see Bregman returning to Boston and Bellinger returning to the Yankees. There might be more players staying than in years past.

        1
        Reply
        • WCSoxFan

          1 month ago

          By afford, i mean ‘afford within their budgetary constraints’. Whether you agree with the budgetary constraints is a completely different matter. Every fan wants the team to spend more. Over the past 7 years revenue estimates are up significantly across the board for MLB teams, except for the Red Sox – not that we can’t blame that on ownership as well though.

          I agree with you on those likely outcomes. But if one team upsets the apple cart there could be a domino effect. Hopefully things start moving by the winter meetings.

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          WC – i’m sorry but, Henry & Co. can say whatever they want, Red Sox revenue is not flat. Not only the Sox, but ALL of baseball is flush, that includes the smallest markets also.
          The “corporatization” of sports franchises means that profits go out to the ownership BEFORE on field considerations are made. Don’t get me wrong, they have every right to make money. That said, the fans are investors in their franchise as well. The fans “profit sharing” is paid in wins. Owning a sports franchise is more than Business 101, its a community trust, and the owners owe as much to the fans as the shareholders.
          Off the soap box now, simply put the Red Sox cant continue to be the 12th highest spender and win championships. Its that simple. You cant have the second highest ticket price and not spend, that’s why the fans are restless.
          With all that, Go Sox!

          1
          Reply
        • rsoxbob

          1 month ago

          Well said, Sad!

          Reply
        • WCSoxFan

          1 month ago

          Why are you sorry? I understand your frustration but the truth is that we’re not shareholders but a customer base for a brand within a cartel. MLB ownership is a good gig if you can get it.

          The Red Sox don’t share any revenue numbers so that days all comes from 3rd party sources (only the Braves report internal numbers). The Red Sox ticket prices have gone up, but not nearly as much as the rest of the league since 2019, which has caused them to drop from 2nd to 5th in median price. Meanwhile Fenway attendance has dropped from 7th to 10th.

          We don’t know of the Red Sox profitability as it isn’t shared, so you can still want them to spend more, but ownership has been consistent in spending since they took over. The main change over the past few seasons is that revenue of other teams is up far more than it is in Boston – that’s the fact of the matter. I’m still expecting the a Red Sox CBT number to be it’s highest ever in 2026.

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          The Red Sox are paying luxury tax and people are still complaining.

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Suit, et al – the four championship years the Sox were first, second or third in payroll! In 2025 they were 12th!
          So, you got what you paid for. A mid-level team that (quite honestly) snuck into the wildcard (and were lucky for it). If you guys are ok with that, then great. I, for one, am not. I dont make excuses for ownership. Clearly there are “financial constraints” placed on the GM. They added almost no payroll at the deadline. Their biggest contract is 34th overall biggest in mlb. You guys are ok with this?
          The whole idea of analytics is that it is a tool to use to help find untapped talent, but more importantly its a tool to not spend money. Why do you need Devers when Romy Gonzalez and Nate Eaton together are just as good? Well, if youre Tampa over 162 youre probably ok. But, if you wanna win a Division or a Championship you need Vladdy batting .450 in the playoffs, or you need Alonso to hit one over the right field fence in a do or die game.
          The simple fact is baseball is a star driven game, has been for 120 years. And, if you do t have Manny and Papi at the top of your order youre not gonna win it all. You’re gonna get three extra games in October.
          So no, im not ok with it

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Sad: Of course you would say that the Red Sox success this year was due to luck and not give Breslow credit. The Red Sox took a step back under Bloom to rebuild the farm system. Their window of contention is just opening up as evidenced by trading from the loaded farm system for Crochet and prospects like Roman Anthony reaching the majors. You might want to to wait and see how much they spend now that the window of contention is open. They just paid luxury tax last year. The Red Sox cannot outspend the Dodgers, Yankees and Mets. So, they will not be in the top 3 payrolls as in the past. That should tell you that things in baseball have changed, but it looks like you don’t recognize that.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          I think they can fill their needs if spending in the #4 to #6 range. Given the market size and competitive window, that is a reasonable expectation.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Wait: So, if they don’t spend in the 4-6 range, does that mean to you they are cheap or don’t care about winning?

          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          If they don’t fill their needs with strong options, that is a sign that they are content with a team that merely makes the playoffs rather than trying for the ring. I believe they can address these needs very well while staying within the second luxury tax level.

          The language is yours, not mine. You sound like Fever, putting words in other people’s mouths.

          I chose this username for a reason. This is the year their competitive window potentially opens all the way.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Wait: “The language is yours, not mine. You sound like Fever, putting words in other people’s mouths.”
          ============================
          How did I put words in other people’s mouths? I asked you a question. I didn’t assume the answer. You said you reasonably expect the Red Sox to spend in the 4-6 highest payroll range and I asked you a question about that.

          Now, it seems you are changing to saying that expect the Red Sox to go over the second luxury threshold. If the Red Sox do not go over the second luxury tax threshold, will you say they are cheap or do not care about winning? (same question as before)

          I ask this question because I think it is a mistake to have a payroll dollar amount in mind that a team needs to spend or else it means they are cheap or lazy. I believe you would probably agree with that, but I am now asking you for the second time.

          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          I’m not going to respond to people asking about language that I haven’t used, if you don’t have a question about any of the languge that I did use, then there isn’t really anything to talk about.

          I believe they have some key needs which, if addressed, would result in a very strong team. I would like to see them address those needs and let the budget fall where it might.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Wait: I agree that they should address needs and the budget will fall where it does. I think focusing on needs makes more sense than focusing on a spending level. I thought my question made sense to ask as we were discussing expected spending levels. You have answered my question!

          1
          Reply
    • its_happening

      1 month ago

      Alonso could mash in Fenway.

      3
      Reply
      • noname617

        1 month ago

        Alonso + Anthony= Nightmare on Landsdowne Street

        1
        Reply
      • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

        1 month ago

        If Red Sox sign Alonso, please trade Casas to the Mariners.

        Reply
  7. casualfan

    2 months ago

    Alonso will be a waste of cash. At least Bergman can field a position. You might as well just sign Suarez to man 3rd and sign Cease as your #2 guy AND if you can trade for Peralta or Ryan, you do that also.

    3
    Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      2 months ago

      I had them signing Suarez and Cease in the contest I think. Maybe trade an OF to the Dodgers for Rushing and pitching.

      1
      Reply
      • FenwayMonster

        1 month ago

        Let’s just call for a moratorium on trades with the Dodgers.

        4
        Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Wade – Which Suarez? There’s literally 3 of them in the Top 50 Free Agent Contest. LOL

        4
        Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          1 month ago

          Eugenio the third baseman. I think I picked all other Suarez’s going to the Dodgers!

          1
          Reply
        • rsoxbob

          1 month ago

          All 3 Suarezes to Boston! :o)

          1
          Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      1 month ago

      Casual – where did this idea that great power hitters also need to be gold glove fielders come from? Alonso is an average fielder, so what…
      Not sure what position Ingrid Bergman plays, and Suarez is to third base what Alonso is to first base.
      Im not sure if I want Alonso or not yet, the time to sign him was last offseason when I absolutely begged for a 3yr $100m deal.

      3
      Reply
      • TB Sox NY

        1 month ago

        Their infield defense was horrible.Good fielding first baseman saves runs.Alonzo would 4 times a game.How many defensive plays does the first baseman have a game?

        Reply
      • WCSoxFan

        1 month ago

        @Sad.Sox 3 This was the issue so many had with Devers. I, for one, was perfectly happy with rotating VGJ/Devers/Casas at 1B/3B/DH – woulda been ugly defensively, but amazing offensively.

        That said, Alonso has been far from average defefnsively. OAA actually rates him as worse at 1B than Devers has been at 3B in fewer games – he’s QUITE bad. (there are youtube videos showing just how bad he is)

        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          WcSoxFan- Alonso said yesterday hes ok with playing DH some. If he ends up in Boston and him and Casas are a 1B and DH platoon, thats awesome. Ill live with a few errors.
          You’re talking about a rare strata of power hitter, and guys you should want on your team. All these guys aren’t gold glovers. In fact, it makes sense that power and fielding agility are not a natural pairing. Its been that way for 100 years.
          In my opinion, the fielding yolk thats been hung on power hitters started as a way to denigrate their hitting prowess and thus pay them less.

          1
          Reply
        • WCSoxFan

          1 month ago

          That makes some sense in that Alonso is the righthanded equivalent of Casas (although 5 years older). But it lessens the overall team value if NEITHER 1st baseman can field. It means they need to keep another player who can play 1b at an average (or better)level for late game situations and then remove one of their best hitters….not ideal. Also, Yoshida is still at 15% better than average hitter who would be wasted on the bench. Not that Alonso isn’t an upgrade, just not ideal use of resources imo.

          I’d be fine with Alonso, but I think he’s a bit too old, will be a bit too expensive and just don’t think he’s a good fit for the current team. If Yoshida and Casas get moved, then I can see it better.

          3
          Reply
    • Dorothy_Mantooth

      1 month ago

      The Sox either need to trade for a #2 starter, or sign one as a free agent, but not both. I believe Boston already has its long term #2 starter in house in Luis Perales. He has the natural ability and stuff to be a TOR pitcher for Boston. His floor should be at worst, a solid #3 starter. It’s such a shame that he had to get Tommy John in 2024 as 2025 was the year for him to make the jump to the majors…now it is pushed back to this upcoming season. I’m really excited to see what Perales does in the AFL and spring training as well. If all goes well, he’ll be pitching in Boston by early May next season if he doesn’t make the team out of camp.

      I think Boston may end up signing someone like Brandon Woodruff or Zac Gallen to a 3-4 year deal. These two should be a little less costly and require less term than someone like Cease, Valdez, etc. Boston may have to go to the trade market for a middle of the order bat instead.

      Imagine what 2025 could have been for Boston if they had a fully healthy Perales & Tanner Houck all season, along with Mayer & Anthony available for the playoffs. This team is very close to going on a multi-year contention run. They need 3-4 key acquisitions this offseason (Bregman would count as 1 of them if they choose to go that route) and they’ll be set up to contend through 2030 IMO.

      2
      Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        1 month ago

        Dammit Dorothy! Framber could be going to the Sox. I liked Suarez because I expect him to have a better value for production over Alonso and Bregman. I think their front office is too smart to be the high bidders for Alonso or Bregman unless they are similar deals to what those guys got last year.

        I like saying dammit Dorothy every time I reply to you.

        2
        Reply
        • Dorothy_Mantooth

          1 month ago

          Boggsy-

          What other team is going to pay Bregman out there? Boston is the perfect fit for him and it’s not even close. I know Bregman wants the most money possible but I believe he’ll settle for 5/$160 (which would achieve his goal of signing a $200M contract last season) by adding his $40M from 2025. I have questions about his age and ability to sustain over 5 years but his value to the team is bigger than his on field production. I’d say the odds are 75% that Boston re-signs him.

          I agree they probably won’t be the highest bidders for Alonso so that’s why they might need to go to the trade market for a RHH power hitter. I hope they don’t try to sign Murakami. The last thing they need is another LHH hitter in their lineup, let alone one who will probably strike out 30% or more in the majors.

          2
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Dorothy – couldnt disagree more. The Sox are not the best fit for Bregman, nor will they be in the same desperate place in terms of money and years as potentially the Tigers, Mets and Cubs are.

          3
          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          1 month ago

          I think I went Tigers for Bregman. Murakami to Mets to replace Alonso. I just don’t see them going 4 or 5 years for Bregman but they are still one of the top likelihoods for him or Alonso.

          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          1 month ago

          P.S. I don’t think Bregman gets a huge deal.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Boggs – funny you bring up Murakami, because I haven’t seen any Sox fans talking about the Sox signing him.
          I think theres a very high chance the Sox make a BIG offer to get him. Sox have a long history of signing japanese players and He fits into Henry’s marketing strategies and merchandising.
          On Bregman, the Tigers have to show their fans theyre willing to spend, and also, they need to get a winner on the field in 2026 before Skubal leaves, and, AJ Hinch. The Mets are in a similarly bad spot. If they lose Alonso, they can move Baty or Vientos to first and slide Bregman right into third.

          Reply
        • cdchi

          1 month ago

          Dm
          I like Josh Naylor at 1stbase. Good hitter, decent power, steals a base even though he is slow. Ok fielder who doesn’t strikeout much,as well as being much cheaper than Alonso.

          3
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – Boston is not an appealing destination for Japanese players right now, we saw that with Seiya and Senga and Ohtani and Yamamoto and Roki just recently ….. not even bothering to make the short trip from NYC to Boston when they were looking for a new team.

          Think about it ….. the flight from Boston to Japan is a lot farther than west coast cities, the intense scrutiny and atmosphere in Boston is not appealing, the recent history of player treatment by ownership/management is obviously a turnoff, and we all know Yoshida is not pleased with the way he’s been treated. The only reason he signed with the Sox is because it was a massive overpay.

          4
          Reply
        • cdchi

          1 month ago

          FPG
          Everyone seemed to know Yoshida could hit, but who was there to discuss his defensive liabilities??. Who and where were the scouts to tell the front office that this player would be basically a DH? ?? Remember when the ball smashed the light at the bottom of the Monstah because he did not go back far enough to catch the ball….

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          cdc – Agreed, the scouts dropped the ball. But other non-Red Sox scouting reports did say he was passable in left field …. just goes to show scouting reports, especially if driven mostly by analytics, are not that reliable.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          CDC – Did you hear the big news about JBJ? I’m glad he’s back in the game, he will be fun to watch.

          2
          Reply
        • cdchi

          1 month ago

          FPG
          I wonder if they watched him in person play . You would think if they are going to pay you millions,you would want in depth ,scouting reports.
          # 1 draft pick of the Bananas. I think I would have really enjoyed it as a kid. Very cool stuff they do . Going to get a bunch of young people to enjoy baseball. What’s his contract??
          I hope he enjoys it. I remember watching him at S.Carolina. I started getting into college baseball when ESPN began broadcasting a ton of games.

          1
          Reply
      • NyyfaninLAA land

        1 month ago

        On Perales, really?
        He has less than 10 IP in AA or better, has never reached 90 IP in a season, isn’t currently Top 5 in the Sox system or in any Top 100, and didn’t exactly wipe the floor in the recently completed AFL season (good K rate – 19 in 11 IP – but 11 BBs and a 10.53 ERA).
        A bigger volume season, reaching AAA, and posting numbers like his limited ‘24 season spent in A+ with a taste of AA would certainly move the needle. But the bigs in May? Sorry but not likely.

        3
        Reply
        • cdchi

          1 month ago

          Nlaa
          Perales,must build up some innings and prove he can get minor league hitters out. With Early and Tolles we already have 2 rookie pitchers who may be competing for rotation spots. I look for progress from Perales this season and maybe compete for a job in 2027. Cool to see the Sox have some homegrown pitching prospects that actually look promising.

          3
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          FPG: “we all know Yoshida is not pleased with the way he’s been treated”
          ==========================
          No, we don’t know that. You are making things up again.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          1 month ago

          We all know that anything that starts with “we all know’ is almost always incorrect.

          1
          Reply
      • Bruin1012

        1 month ago

        Connelly Early is going to be good big league starter at least a mid rotation starter. He just checks all the boxes he is a five pitch pitcher, he gets a lot of swing and miss, he gets a lot of ground balls, and he induces soft contact. He’s taken big steps since being drafted his fastball velocity has increased and he got exponentially better as his fastball velo increased. I’m willing to bet his fastball velo increases again going into next season instead of sitting 93-94 he will be sitting a tick higher 94-95 but possibly two ticks 95-96. He knows how to pitch, mixes his pitches well and is not afraid to throw his fastball for strikes.

        I think Luis Perales future is going to be in the pen. His stuff is high end but aside for a couple of months in 2024 he’s had trouble throwing strikes. The Red Sox are going to have a crazy AAA rotation next year led by Tolle maybe Perales fits in there but maybe not it will be interesting to see what shakes out in spring training. Don’t sleep on Tolle he was developing a change, sweeper, curve ball to go with his elite fastball and his slider. Going to be interesting to see how far he comes with his secondaries this off-season and don’t forget his elite extension as much or more than anyone in baseball.

        9
        Reply
      • cdchi

        1 month ago

        Dm
        I like Perales also,but I don’t think you can put much faith in him yet. Has to prove he can stay healthy,and dominate in the high minors. May start out the majors coming out of the pen. Has to build up innings. According to Sox prospects.com he has a ceiling of a #2 starter. Sox finally are building up there pitching prospects.

        2
        Reply
  8. redsox for_life

    2 months ago

    Trade Duran, Tolle. Arias, Yushida plus 20millons for Joe Ryan or Fredy Peralta! Suarez or Williams… Pete Alonso and Schwarber

    Reply
    • alan.kawadler@verizon.net 2

      2 months ago

      all that for 2 years of Rylan and 1 year of Peralta. that haul may get alcantra.

      Reply
      • redsox for_life

        1 month ago

        Alcantara cost more $$

        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Sandy is $17m next year and $21m in 2027, I think the Sox can afford that

          Reply
    • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

      1 month ago

      Alonso + Schwarber would be bad for baseball. That’s too many homeruns just for one team. It’s better if you spread that out.

      Reply
  9. WCSoxFan

    2 months ago

    Roster Resource’s number is likely a little high aside from the 13.5mil currently earmarked for Nathaniel Lowe. Plus all indicators are that they’ll be spending to at least the first tier past the CBT (261mil) but hopefully up to the 2nd tier (281mil).

    2
    Reply
  10. FatChance65

    2 months ago

    NOT LUKE WEAVER! Noooooo!

    1
    Reply
  11. gold masters

    2 months ago

    Alonso has a lot of pluses. RBI hr plays almost every game, every year, will dh if you give him big contract

    2
    Reply
  12. dlj0527

    2 months ago

    Setting aside injuries, I feel they are a couple batters and couple pitchers away from having a division winning team again. Might need to trade some of their young players while holding onto Duran and those they’ve already extended unless another team is willing to take on the extended players contract.

    1
    Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      1 month ago

      Dlj – great analysis! I agree
      Just a couple of hitters and couple pitchers away.

      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Sad – And don’t forget about the biggest factor, good health.

        One injury to Crochet, or Chapman, or Anthony and they are in deep doo-doo unless they get replaced. They are not a deep team, not yet anyway.

        3
        Reply
  13. Therealeman

    2 months ago

    Schwarber is a better fit in Boston than in Philly, as Boston has a young, versatile outfield and Philly needs a top outfielder above all. But my sense is Philly ownership knows Schwarber fills seats, sells jerseys and boosts ratings. They’ll outspend for non baseball purposes.

    1
    Reply
    • noname617

      1 month ago

      How about mngt nut up and sign both?

      Reply
      • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

        1 month ago

        That would be too much power centered on one team. Can’t let that happen. Boston hitting 350-400 homeruns would be bad for baseball.

        Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          1 month ago

          It would be great for baseball.

          1
          Reply
        • noname617

          1 month ago

          Dodgers-Mets-Yanks got that memo too

          Reply
  14. whyhayzee

    1 month ago

    Alonso has scooping skills but can’t throw for beans. I’d like them to have a strong defensive shortstop. The rest can work itself out. I think they may need to trade for their number two starter. I just don’t want them to give away too much of their young talent. They are close to being a really good team.

    1
    Reply
    • WaitTil2026

      1 month ago

      Kim would be a key addition if Bregman doesn’t return, and would still make the club better if he does.

      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        1 month ago

        Wait – this is not a “toy around the edges” year. The Sox need too much to be thinking about Kim.

        1
        Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          He doesn’t replace their other needs, but he complements them nicely. This isn’t a season where you cut corners and stick to a budget, this is a season where you find the best players you can to fill all the needs, and don’t settle for second best.

          They need a second ace pitcher behind Crochet. They need a true slugger at DH. They need a good defensive infielder. They need a fourth shutdown reliever.

          Go big or go home, and don’t tell me that they “can’t afford” to meet all those needs. Half measures here are pointless.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          Oh, and they of course need Bregman back. But if that doesn’t happen then they definitely need all the rest.

          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        1 month ago

        I agree on Kim. That moves Story to 2nd and Mayer to 3rd. Add Alonso and trade Duran + for a #2 SP.

        1
        Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          That works, though I prefer Schwarber to Alonso. And I doubt those three infielders will make it through the full season without injury. Unless you add a fourth, then Sogard likely sees significant PT.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Wait – I love Schwarbah. Sox should’ve kept him when he was here.
          In terms of a flat out Schwarber vs Alonso debate….Sox need a righty and someone who can play in the infield at least part of the time. Alonso, is the better fit in a 1v1 among those two.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          I would rather use Romy as a part-time 1B than rely on Alonso’s glove, he’s pretty bad. If Alonso signs, I would tell him to throw away his glove. (Um, maybe not. Let’s not go there.)

          Understand that Schwarber is a LHH, not a RHH, but he has been (slightly) better against LHP than RHP over the last three years. He can flat-out hit to the point that I don’t think it really matters which side of the plate he stands on. Makes a bigger difference for a lesser hitter like Duran or Abreu.

          I wouldn’t necessarily object to Alonso on the right deal, just believe it would be a mistake to pass on the better player (Schwarber) for the better fit (Alonso).

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Wait- Schwarber is older and cant field at all. Hiw much have you watched Alonson actually play? He’s fine. You normally dont get 35 hrs and 100+rbi from a fielding wizard

          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          If you say so… I haven’t seen Alonso all that much, but the defensive metrics are pretty bad and he moves poorly from what I have seen. I agree that you may reasonably sacrifice some defense for that power.

          Agreed that Schwarber would never (or only very rarely) take the field.

          Reply
    • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

      1 month ago

      Red Sox need a step-back year. They had lots of injuries with Casas, Mayer, Abreu, etc. They need a season just to get healthy and then re-access, see where everything stands. Then look into the market next offseason if they think they still need any upgrades. It’s always prudent to be prudent.

      1
      Reply
      • noname617

        1 month ago

        What? Losers take steps back and next year is-not the time to pause momentum. You realize they’re close.. very close.

        3
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          non – Agreed! Even Sox ownership has been saying for years, 2026 is when they plan to try and finally contend. Mayer and Roman are basically settled in, that was the key they were waiting for. They’ve got so much young, controllable talent on relatively inexpensive contracts (compared to free agents) that they can afford to splurge on some bigtime free agents.

          It’s go time!!!

          4
          Reply
        • Bruin1012

          1 month ago

          The Red Sox are very close and it’s why I want them to go now and for ownership to step. This team should have 280 million plus payroll and if they do that they can sign what they need and not trade away prospects. It’s time for ownership to join the party make the big free agent signings. Keep the powder dry for the trade deadline.

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          FPG: “Sox ownership has been saying for years, 2026 is when they plan to try and finally contend”
          ============================
          No. They never said that. It would be big news and brought up often if they ever said that.

          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          1 month ago

          They never said that in so many words, however I agree that they’ve been targeting the 2026-2028 window for a few years now. This is where you step up and go for the ring if you have any intention of doing so.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Suit – that is EXACTLY word for wore what the Sox front office said.

          reddit.com/r/redsox/comments/1nzpzdx/red_sox_leade….

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Sad: That Boston Globe article is from a month ago. FPG falsely claims the Red Sox have been saying something for years. Please post some quotes from the Boston Globe article so we can see what they actually said a month ago. I can’t access the article so far.

          Reply
        • spitfire

          1 month ago

          And if they didn’t lose their minds trading Raffy they would have a juggernaut team. Please tell me one other team dumping a player with a big mouth mid season for nuttin.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – OMG is that clown still trying to backtrack Sam’s comments from nearly 2 years ago?

          I told him numerous times that Sam said in an interview broadcast by NESN on one of the pregames, Sam’s exact words when defending their lack of spending and lack of impact trade acquisitions that year were “we have a core of great young players on the verge of coming up, once they become established then we will push all our chips in”..

          Since they weren’t expected to be MLB regulars until the following year (2025) that’s why Red Sox Nation knew they wouldn’t be trying to compete until 2026. I explained this to that guy numerous times since he doesn’t bother to watch pregames, and he kept ignoring the fact it was already explained to him. 100% trolling by someone who must have some sort of connection to the team. No different than Ortiz constantly shooting his mouth off with team propaganda and he conveniently never mentions he’s on the team payroll and gets paid to hype management and ownership.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          spit – Exactly! Raffy is one of the greatest Yankee-killers of all time.

          They went 5-1 against the Yankees with Raffy this year, then 5-5 without him. Not a coincidence.

          2
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          FPG calls me a clown, but he has never posted a link to anything credible to back up what he is saying.

          Reply
  15. BurnerK

    1 month ago

    Trade for Andrew Abbott. And dont rule out Edwin Diaz. He would appreciate a Latin friendly club and he would not have a problem working with Chapman. But diaz will be given the moon and stars by Los Angeles if he can stomach the west coast.

    Reply
  16. BurnerK

    1 month ago

    I am surprised no one mentions Ranger Suarez for the Sox. He has very similar ground ball rates as Crochet and he doesn’t give up pulls either. Very similar metrics.

    3
    Reply
    • rsoxbob

      1 month ago

      I am not necessariy advocating for this due to Geno’s bad defense, but a case can be made for Sox to cover IF, SP and RP needs by signing all 3 Suarez FAs.

      1
      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        1 month ago

        Rsoxbob – best idea I’ve heard in a long while on MLBTR.
        Let’s do it!!!

        3
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – If that happens, I’m hosting a soirée!!!

          4
          Reply
  17. Ebouch25

    1 month ago

    I hate the angle of how Bregman is good for the locker room. His stats weren’t that good and how much should a babysitter cost? Paying an aging player to babysit is asinine.

    9
    Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      1 month ago

      Ebouch25 – THANK YOU!!! So he bought a couple of rookies suits in spring training, if Breslow would’ve thought of that we couldve saved $39.975m dollars and still have Devers and a comp pick.
      If his leadership skills were so great shouldn’t he have opted in to the remaining $80m and show the clubhouse what commitment means?
      Instead, we get nothing, Scott Boras wins again and Alex Bregman makes more money somewhere else.
      Screw him! There is no way in the world i would ever offer him a contract after getting played like that for the mediocre stat line we got

      6
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Sad – Without question the entire Sox organization has been pushing the narrative of Bregman being a great teammate with the hope he’d stay longterm. It’s all PR, they want to paint a picture of Breggy being more valuable than Devers and this is how they are doing it. And of course Cora wants his BFF to stay.

        Let’s face it, a great clubhouse leader wouldn’t ensure all these feel-good stories getting leaked. A good deed isn’t quite as good if it’s publicized.

        4
        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          FPG – if Bregman was such a leader he should’ve shown leadership and taken the options and the $80m and see this through. Instead he weaseled out just the way Boras drew it up, and that makes me angry.
          Look what Bieber did in Toronto, thats leadership

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – Bregman was and will always be all about the money. He waited until spring training, finally deciding to turn down the guaranteed longterm offers because he wanted even bigger guaranteed longterm offers.

          Anybody who didn’t realize his plan was to use the Red Sox and Fenway to re-build his value is delusional. And he was NEVER gonna play 2B, that was total crap from him and his BFF.

          3
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Sad: You are angry someone exercised an option they negotiated into their contract?

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          FPG: “Bregman was and will always be all about the money.”
          ===============
          Most people in this world are. It is quite normal.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Suit – i couldnt care less about Bregman the person.
          I am angry because the Sox front office got played by Boras. Bregman essentially opted out the day he signed that contract. The opt in was injury protection.
          So, yes, I am angry that the Sox: overpaid, won’t resign a good player, lost a draft picks and Devers.
          The question is, why aren’t you angry?

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – Even though I can’t see that other person’s comment to which you’re responding, I had to chuckle. That person, in all these years, has always taken Sox management’s side on everything. They’ve denied getting paid by the team or having any association with the team ….. you be the judge ;O)

          3
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Sad: The Bregman contract turned out to be a one-year contract. I agree with the saying, “There is no such thing as a bad one-year contract.”

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          I don’t work for the Red Sox. I actually like the Red Sox, unlike FPG and others here.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Suit – i completely understand why you would say that no one year contract is a bad thing.
          Here is my problem with that. There is no continuity, no connection, no teamwork.
          But, more so than that, if you are constantly churning, no need to be right more often than youre wrong. Its not a bullpen where you can hide your mistakes. If you are constantly replacing position players when does it end? The season you get all of your choices right? Cause you know when that happens, never

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          1 month ago

          Sad: I’ll think about that. I’ve never viewed one-year contracts as a bad thing. They seem to be part of baseball, especially high value one-year contracts such as with Qualifying Offers.

          Reply
        • spitfire

          1 month ago

          I am still angry over Breslow n Henry acting like angry toddlers having a temper tantrum trading Raffy mid season for nothing n not being responsible enuff to tuff it out for the yr then revisit trading him in the postseason for so much more .

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          spit – Exactly! Raffy is so much more valuable now, not only because he has become a solid first baseman but also because he proved he can avoid missing games ….. he played in 163 games this year!!!

          And with the Giants he also proved he is an exceptionally great teammate, proving all the crap lacked out of the Red Sox front office was just that – crap!

          2
          Reply
  18. JoeBrady

    1 month ago

    I’d guess that the odds of the RS signing Williams for $15M, to be their 7th inning specialist, are about -0-.

    Reply
    • Horace Fury

      1 month ago

      I haven’t been sold by the talk about the Sox signing a relative big name for the pen–I don’t think they need an outside star–but from the Top 50 Free Agents, I thought Seranthony Dominguez looked like a possibility to work the 7th, give or take an inning.

      I like Alcantara as much or more than any of the other usual suspects (Ryan, Peralta) for a #2SP trade. And, since the Mets are suddenly down on Senga, I’m wondering if the (now somewhat depleted) brain trust has seen something in him they could work with. He could be had for not much capital and would cost 2/28. If you look at his 2024 and 2025 stats, the numbers are fine–I’m not sure why the Mets are disaffected (injury?). Just a thought.

      Reply
    • noname617

      1 month ago

      Or take less money from a middle market team with no path to legit titles, sparse fanbase, and unstable org—fyi it’s a privalage to play in sold out stadiums.

      Reply
  19. Baseballisthebest

    1 month ago

    There is a lot of talk on the radio here about Breslow trading with the Nationals for Abrams, going all in on Imai, trading for Freddy Peralta, and making a play for Alonso. All of which sound like exceptional ideas to me.

    Of course you always have to take what Boston area sports radio personalities say with a grain of salt.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      1 month ago

      I have no idea why they would go after a lefty SS who can’t play SS.

      1
      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        1 month ago

        Joe- youre 100% right. Its lazy to think that everyone on the Nationals is now available to the Sox because a former employee went there

        Reply
  20. spitfire

    1 month ago

    Please tell me Hicks will never see the major league teams BP again! He gives me nightmares and PTSD!

    1
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension

    Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin

    Cubs Sign Hunter Harvey

    Marlins Sign Pete Fairbanks

    Pirates To Sign Ryan O’Hearn

    White Sox Sign Sean Newcomb

    Athletics Acquire Jeff McNeil

    Mets Sign Luke Weaver

    Nationals Sign Foster Griffin

    Padres Sign Sung-Mun Song

    Rangers Re-Sign Chris Martin

    Red Sox Acquire Willson Contreras

    White Sox To Sign Munetaka Murakami

    Blue Jays Interested In Alex Bregman

    Tigers Re-Sign Kyle Finnegan

    Astros, Pirates, Rays Finalize Three-Team Trade Sending Brandon Lowe To Pittsburgh, Mike Burrows To Houston, Jacob Melton To Tampa

    Rays Trade Shane Baz To Orioles

    Nine Teams Exceeded Luxury Tax Threshold In 2025

    Royals Acquire Matt Strahm

    Twins Sign Josh Bell

    Recent

    Mariners Reluctant To Deal From Major League Roster

    Kazuma Okamoto Travels To U.S. For In-Person Meetings With Teams

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript

    Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension

    Andy Kosco Passes Away

    Mitch White, Guillermo Heredia Re-Sign With KBO’s SSG Landers

    The Opener: Red Sox, Pending Free Agent Contracts, Mets

    Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin

    Joe Kelly Announces End Of His Playing Career

    Rangers Sign Nabil Crismatt To Minors Contract

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version