The Cubs have interest in Eugenio Suarez as they explore the third base market, according to a report from Francys Romero of Beisbol FR.
While Chicago doesn’t appear to be getting involved in the sweepstakes for outgoing superstar Kyle Tucker, that doesn’t mean they won’t be active in other areas of free agency this winter. The Cubs haven’t been shy about their focus being on adding a starter to the front half of their rotation, and they’ve been connected to players like Michael King, Tatsuya Imai, Zac Gallen, and Ranger Suarez amid those efforts. They also remain in the market for bullpen help even after signing Phil Maton and missing out on Ryan Helsley when the latter signed in Baltimore last month.
While the focus on Chicago’s offseason seems to primarily be on pitching, bolstering a lineup that appears poised to lose Tucker makes plenty of sense. The Cubs have been connected to Alex Bregman with relative frequency in recent days after being one of the final teams in on his market last winter. After a solid but unspectacular (93 wRC+, 1.5 fWAR) season from Matt Shaw at the hot corner last year and with second baseman Nico Hoerner ticketed for free agency after the 2026 season, it’s easy to see why the Cubs might want to bolster their infield mix this winter.
As for Suarez himself, he’d surely be a more affordable option than Bregman. The 34-year-old is coming off one of the best seasons of his career as he slugged 49 home runs and posted a 125 wRC+, but his market has been relatively quiet to this point in the winter. The Mariners are open to reuniting with Suarez, but are seemingly prioritizing a potential reunion with Jorge Polanco at this point. Teams like the Yankees, Red Sox, Brewers, and Astros were connected to Suarez on the trade market over the summer, but there have been no connections drawn between Suarez and any of those teams this offseason. That’s not necessarily a surprise, of course; trading for a few months of a player just before they hit free agency is a very different decision than signing them to what could be a multi-year commitment.
Even so, the fit between the Cubs and Suarez is a fairly apparent one. He would help boost the Cubs’ offense and provide cover for Shaw at third base, just as Bregman would, though he likely wouldn’t command nearly as much of a commitment in terms of years or dollars. MLBTR predicted Suarez would land a deal worth three years and $63MM in free agency this winter as part of our Top 50 MLB Free Agents list, where Suarez ranked 20th. By contrast, MLBTR’s prediction for Bregman (ranked 5th in this year’s class) landed at six years and $160MM. That difference can be attributed to the fact that Bregman is two years younger than Suarez and has been much more consistent throughout his career, in addition to being a significantly better defender at third base.
Even with Suarez’s flaws, that discrepancy in price tag could make him an appealing alternative to Bregman for a few reasons. The Cubs have treated the first luxury tax threshold as something of a soft cap in recent years, and according to RosterResource the club has just under $197MM in commitments for luxury tax purposes in 2026. The difference in AAV on MLBTR’s contract predictions for Suarez and Bregman sits at just under $6MM. That’s a relatively small amount compared to the roughly $46MM between the Cubs’ current spending level and the first threshold of the luxury tax, but that wiggle room could be meaningful if the team also looks to add a rotation arm in free agency.
Additionally, Chicago has seemingly been hesitant to add significant money to the books long-term outside of Dansby Swanson’s contract with the club. Maton (signed through 2027) became just the second player on the roster signed to a guaranteed deal beyond the 2026 season. While it stands to reason that more are likely to come throughout this winter, it’s fair to think the Cubs might value the long-term flexibility signing someone like Suarez would provide given how they’ve constructed the rest of their roster. For example, if the Cubs were interested in either extending Hoerner or re-signing him next offseason, committing to a multi-year deal for their second baseman might seem more palatable with a short-term deal for Suarez on the books rather than a long-term deal for Bregman.
It should be noted that while the Cubs have only been directly connected to Suarez and Bregman so far, they’re far from the only two third basemen who figure to be available this winter. NPB star Kazuma Okamoto is set to come over from Japan this winter and has spent most of his career at the hot corner. The aforementioned Polanco also has some limited experience at the hot corner. KBO infielder Sung Mun Song, veteran Yoan Moncada, utility man Willi Castro and former Gold Glover Ramon Urias are among the lower-tier third base capable players on the market this winter.

Keep dreaming. Discount Jed won’t commit to spending money.
If/when he does spend, I don’t think E.Suarez is the answer.
Jed is just the valet or butler, Ricketts controls the purse strings
Ricketts has set the budget at the Tax line. It’s Hoyers job to figure out the talent and contracts. And please don’t say that Carter Hawkins has anything to do with anything. I have as much to say about it as he does. In fact, Now that Jed has got his extension I wouldn’t be shocked to see Hawkins take a powder which probably isn’t a big loss.
Ok, if he is willing to go to the tax line, let’s get Imai and a couple of relievers and call it an off-season. But I am skeptical that Cubs will offer Imai seven years and $175 and I think that is what it will take to be seriously considered.
If they sign Imai for whatever they will probably move Taillon. 25-30 in, 18 out. They can’t trade Shota without his consent because he signed the QO. I’m assuming they won’t trade Boyd who was a bargain last year. So who does that leave as odd man out? I like Taillon personally but trade him for a reliever, Save 18 million, Add a guy with Ace potential and a reliever kill 2 birds with one stone and only add like 7-10 million to 197 million and you still have money for a couple of relievers and a utility guy. Then call it an off season. If you offer Imai opt outs if he’s good and he opts out you’re not obligated for the long term and in 2027 you have new CBA and only 3 guys with money owed. Maton, Imai and Swanson. Then swing for the fences.
Don’t tell Alfred…
I don’t like the fit. Interferes with Shaw’s development, downgrade in defense. Yes he has power, but poor contact skills.
They may trade Shaw.
I’m only good with trading Shaw if they bring in a superior option (I don’t think Suarez is that big of an upgrade).. Bregman would work, but I suspect he will be vastly overpaid for the production he will give.
That would be so bad. If they gave up on him after 1 year. Don’t know if they want to lose Cam Smith, Matt Shaw, Kyle Tucker, Nico Hoerner, Seiya Suzuki, and Ian Happ in a matter of 3 offseasons. Allowing that to happen is a good way to get fired. Extension be damned.
‘Losing Happ’? Nothing against Ian personally – but it’s time, and the position that is due for an upgrade!
Happ just happens to be a free agent at the same time as Nico , Seiya and now that I think of it. Jameson is also a free agent after 2026. I 100% agree. I like Happ but it’s time to upgrade. Maybe the kid they drafted will be a quick development and he starts in left in 2027. Or 2028 if the owners and PA are LAF, SAF, and DAF to potentially not play any baseball. Which would hurt the game.
Extending Nico Hoerner should be a team top priority.
2025 WAR:
Nico Hoerner 6.2
Kyle Tucker 4.6
Eugenio Suarez 3.6
Matt Shaw 3.1
Seiya Suzuki 2.6
Cam Smith 1.9
Suarez can also back up 1B, so consider him a more expensive Justin Turner who can actually produce something. It’s insurance that Caissie can actually produce, because if he can’t then Suarez is at DH and Suzuki is in RF.
So that puts Shaw in a batting order job share with Caissie, with who ever is playing that day in the field and then either Suzuki or Suarez at 3B. If Caissie struggles, which we should expect at first, then Shaw probably gets 110 starts.
I would rather have Bregman and endure Ballesteros or Amaya trying to play 1B when Busch needs a day off. But if Bregman is hell bent on going back to Boston then I will take Suarez.
If they trade Cassie for pitching then Suzuki moves back to right and Suarez can DH and sit on occasion for Ballesteros. That might be why they’re considering him. I wouldn’t want him to supplant Shaw at 3rd either.
They aren’t going to trade Caissie with both Happ and Suzuki being free agents after 2026. If anything, they would trade Ballesteros, but I think they would keep all their young players and move Suarez to be the primary 2027 DH and occasional 3B/1B.
Also in my earlier comment it should read “then either Suzuki or Suarez at DH.”
If the Cubs sign or trade for an upgrade at 3B, Shaw could see some reps at 2B, in anticipation of Hoerner leaving for FA after 2026.
Definitely perfect fit, bad defense, lots of strikeouts.
They could also sign Suarez to fortify the bullpen and drive the scorer crazy.
We ain’t signing anyone with more upside than Justin Freaking Turner. That’s the gold standard for us unfortunately
I’m not really a fan of signing Suarez, we don’t need any more strikeouts in the lineup and defense is one of the biggest strengths, so no use downgrading that
Gino best fits back in Seattle
This is from Suarez’s camp
When it’s a choice between an old guy who just had his career year and will cost a bunch of money which the Cubs say they won’t spend or a young guy who was in the hunt for a Gold Glove and his bat improved as the year went on let’s see what would I do? Yep you got it. This has no shot IMO and was started by Suarez’s agent. I have a better chance of getting some from Sydney Sweeney. I bought her Jeans but she didn’t come with them. Suing for false advertising.
UncleMike, did the jeans at least come with her picture or an invitation to join her fan club? Might consider it myself if they’re priced moderately.
No. LOL
I understand why many of my fellow Cubs fans might not be enthusiastic about getting Suarez–I acknowledge the negatives–BUT, I respectfully submit that it’s been such a long time since we had a real home-run hitter, that we have forgotten how valuable one can be. Suarez will hit 40+ homers, not just talk about it or “be on pace for it” or tease it, and that will win some games.
Alan
It all depends on the terms. I could easily see the Cubs offering Geno a one year deal around $22 million if they had no competition for his services. But I would rather see them use the money on a starting pitcher like Ranger Suarez, who will require a multi-year deal.
Right now Caissie and Alcantara are the 3rd and 4th outfielders after Happ and PCA. And Ballesteros is the DH heir apparent to Seiya, who is under contract only through 2026.
The rotation is Horton, Steele, Boyd, Shota, Rea with Assad in the wings.
Like the Cubs don’ have enough LH starters? I’d rather see Wicks than Suarez. Suarez fastball tops out around 91 MPH. Can you say LH Kyle Hendricks? He won’t age well at all. No thank you.
I get that.
Horton, Rea and Assad are RHPs.
Steele, Boyd and Shota are LHPs.
If you don’t like Ranger, then my focus would be King or Gallen.
One RHP that I would like as well … Brad Keller but only if it is understood as a reliever.
What I don’t want, trading prospects for Gore or a Fish pitcher.
My focus would be Imai or trade some prospects for a guy like Alcantara or maybe a guy less injured than King. Gallen and King aren’t really an improvement over what’s here now IMO. If Alcantara is healthy he has #1 upside.
Imai would be a prefect fit if Ricketts has sold the club by next week.
Agree to disagree on risk with Alcantara versus King.
—-
Tatsuya Imai’s MLB free agency contract projections range widely, but most experts forecast a deal well into the nine figures, generally between $150 million and $200 million over 6-8 years, with predictions clustering around $150M-$175M, factoring in his youth, top-tier pitching arsenal, and the required posting fee paid to his NPB team. Key figures like MLB Trade Rumors (6 years, $150M) and Jim Bowden (7 years, $154M) suggest significant contracts
He’s only 28. I’m thinking 25 million a year for however long you want with opt outs gets it home. Considering a slug like Gallen wants 20 million a year for mediocre I say go big. Ricketts has spent money like that before Shouldn’t be a big deal.
I rate them
Imai
Ranger King Framber
Cease Gallen Alcantara
My main problem is trading prospects rather than spending dollars.
Ricketts could spend $30 million on Imai and ten million on relievers and still be under tax threshold one.
Any rotation that includes Assad isn’t good enough.
Assad is very good IMO. He’ll be the biggest benefactor from ABS. His stuff is late breaking and he gets robbed more than anybody the Cubs have. But he’s probably ticketed for a relief role this year so you can stop worrying unless a bunch of guys get hurt, In which case it probably won’t matter.
Correction to my above post
Rotation is Horton, Steele, Boyd, Taillon, Shota, Rea and Assad.
Plenty of room to make a couple of these guys relievers.
Assad does not have special stuff, but he usually manages to do just enough to keep the team in the game.
Maybe in July. I don’t see Steele back before then. And that’s a best case scenario. I think Brown and Assad start out relievers either in AAA or MLB. Wicks in AAA. With no addition Horton-Boyd-Taillion-Shota-Rea to start out anyway. Assad probably the long man barring injuries in ST.
mlb.com/news/justin-steele-javier-assad-tendered-c…
cubbiescrib.com/justin-steele-s-2026-return-now-ha….
facebook.com/100085955408365/posts/good-news-justi…
ap-southeast-1.cubsinsider.com/2025/10/20/justin-s…
Anybody from The Athletic has less credibility than Bruce Levine. They are a bunch of morons. I wouldn’t read it for free much less pay for it.
Nooooo. Please nooooo.
Waiting for the Eugenio Suarez rumored Cubs interest. The Cubs seem interested in most all free agents and trades for starting pitchers. I’d be surprised if they manage to pull something off that’s considered a difference maker. Jed just won’t drop the hammer. Sure, he’ll inquire. But pull back when he realizes the actual cost. Doesn’t matter if it’s straight dollars-Free Agents or prospects\ player cost for a trade. Jed will fill out the roster with the leftovers from the buffet table. Maybe he getst lucky like the bullpen last year
Fred- If the Cubs do nothing about starting pitching here I’ll actually feel better because then I think they might have a shot at Imai. Imai probably won’t sign until later in his posting window and I’d be very surprised if he signed this week. Lets’ just say Gallen, King and others don’t move the bar at all for me. They aren’t better than what the Cubs have IMO. The thing that can take shape this week is the bullpen. Either aim high for Schwarber or Imai or Jed should keep it in his pants.
Your logic here makes some sense. But, my opinion is Imai is signed during the Winter Meetings. The concern is regression with the starters. That can be said of all starting staffs. I get it. Boyd, Tallion are the top candidates. Steele likely won’t be available until July at best. And Shota? Well the Cubs didn’t offer anything up to keep him. It was his decision to stay. What does that say? Not a lot of confidence. Horton just doesn’t have a full body of work. Very good in 25 but suffered some injuries again. And that’s a pattern. We’ll see Uncle. The Cubs stall as currently constructed is suspect at best.
Fred- I think the idea should be to get better. Gallen, King and guys like that aren’t better than Taillon which should be the goal. Imai, Alcantara ( If Healthy) , Gore, Ryan would be better. The others are sideways moves. And you’re right no matter what the writers say Steele shouldn’t rush back and July would be about 14 months which is normal. And another thing people forget is Steele is no spring chicken. He’ll be 31 in July because he was a late bloomer. There is no rush to bring him back. They can get by and let him heal up. Then it would be like trading for a starting pitcher in July without having to give anything back or add salary.
I’d bet serious money that this doesn’t happen. They need a closer and probably another SP. And Shaw is about 50/50 to out-perform Suarez next year.
40+ homeruns on that team sure would be nice though. I think they lack a bit on the power side and that was shown in the playoffs. You need big dingers in the playoffs (remember Gino’s grand slam to win Game 5 of the ALCS? )
Suarez was one of the contracts to avoid by Kiley McDaniel on ESPN
espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/47188747/mlb-2025-26-free-…
If they do this, I believe they will move Shaw to second base and trade Nico, who is in the final year of his contract, I believe. I’m not saying I think that’s a great idea, but it’s very Hoyer… And really then would depend on the return for Nico before it could be graded. I really want to see them go get Kwan from Cleveland, to play left field and bat lead off. I’m not sure if they can pull that off, but it would sure be nice to see him in left instead of Ian Happ.
Nico is a really good fit on Cubs.
I’m really hoping they can extend Nico again. It shouldn’t cost as much as whatever free agents will be getting.
Agree
“Interested” drinking game.
I’m interested in Aubrey Plaza. lol Cubs
You and about 500,000 other guys! LOL
That’s the Cubs way, leaking they’re interested in this guy or that guy but eventually when the guy signs elsewhere the Cubs claim oh well we tried.
No they don’t
What was the purpose of trading for Kyle Tucker last year? If you have no intention on budding on him at the top of the market it only makes sense to trade for him if 1. The Astros were giving him away or 2. The cubs were at the end of their
Window one player away
Im concerned that neither Cubs or Astros have not shown any interest on Tucker, its like they know something we all don’t.
The Astros simply can’t afford him given their budget restrictions. It’s why they had to move him and if Alvarez doesn’t get hurt last season they wouldn’t have missed a beat.
Cubs dont need another strike out machine like Suarez.
One of the most logical parts of trading for Tucker was that he fit with the very good defense, hard to strike out mold this lineup needs. Suarez is exactly the opposite. Sure, power, but so many strikeouts. With PCA, Shaw, Swanson, etc., the Cubs have enough strikeouts.
The second half of this argument is that Shaw wasn’t that bad last year. He played excellent defense all year and really came on with the bat in the second half. Trading multiple years of control of an ascending hitter only to sign Suarez is not a good move, IMO. And I don’t think he’s going to net you an ace on his own, which is the only reason I’d move him.
If they move Hoerner or Shaw and sign Bregman, I’m listening. If it’s anyone else, I’d rather keep the both of them.
They don’t need more strikeouts but I believe that team definitely needs more homeruns. Where will Tucker’s 22 HR’s come from in 2026 ?
“Wasn’t that bad “ last year – talk about damning with faint praise
They just need to keep Shaw out there, the kid can play
Shaw will be traded
I still don’t understand the Cubs trading a stud prospect for a one-year Tucker rental.
No, I’m good on Geno. Shaw showed he can take the next step next season, and Geno will want multiple years. Hoyer should be in on Imai, that’s where the budget should go.
They have an interst in everyone as long as they will work on the cheap
As the major market cubbies continue their policy under hoyer of bargain basement hunting. Nobody in mlb enjoys working with hoyer!