The Mets have been perusing the trade market in hopes of bolstering their rotation and have their eye on Twins right-hander Joe Ryan as one of several targets, Jon Heyman of the New York Post reports. He adds that the Twins like young Mets righty Jonah Tong — hardly a surprise, given that Tong is widely regarded as one of the sport’s top pitching prospects.
As recently as the All-Star break, the idea of the Twins trading Ryan seemed far-fetched. Minnesota spent the entirety of the first half hovering around .500 and keeping themselves in the AL Central/Wild Card races. The Twins cratered coming out of the Midsummer Classic enough to push ownership and the front office into sell mode. What was originally thought to be a soft sale of primarily rental players instead turned into a staggering dismantle of the roster. The Twins traded 11 players in the final week of July.
Notably absent from that swath of trades was the 29-year-old Ryan. He drew plenty of interest, with the Red Sox, Blue Jays and Dodgers among those reported to be in pursuit. But given his affordable salary and multiple years of remaining club control, the asking price was understandably steep. No deal materialized.
Ryan is projected by MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz to earn an eminently affordable $5.8MM in 2026 — his penultimate season of club control. He’d be owed one more raise next winter before reaching free agency post-2027. It’s an unequivocal bargain for a pitcher who’s logged a 3.50 ERA with a 27.8% strikeout rate and just a 5.1% walk rate across the past two seasons (3.79, 27.6% and 5.7% in his career, respectively).
What’s not yet clear, however, is how aggressively the Twins will explore trades for Ryan — if they do at all. President of baseball operations Derek Falvey suggested earlier in the offseason that he’d yet to be given a firm budget by ownership. That seems hard to believe, but the Twins have ostensibly been in the process of finalizing the addition of two significant minority investors for months now. To this point, there’s been no firm indication that the addition of those partial stakeholders — and any influx of cash they might bring to the table — has been finalized.
Falvey plainly stated that unless or until he hears otherwise, his offseason focus will be on adding pieces to help the 2026 Twins — not further subtracting from the roster. It’s been quiet for the Twins all offseason with the exception of some small-scale moves leading up to the non-tender deadline and Rule 5 protection deadline. Minnesota acquired Alex Jackson from the Orioles, giving them a backup to starting catcher Ryan Jeffers, and they also nabbed reliever Eric Orze in another small trade with the Rays.
That’s the extent of the Twins’ activity thus far, making it tough to get a read on whether Falvey & Co. might genuinely be given the green light to add to the club or whether a further teardown will take place. If Ryan and/or Pablo Lopez (owed $43.5MM through 2027) are traded this winter, then it’s only logical that Jeffers (entering his final year of club control) would be on the table as well. And though star center fielder Byron Buxton said on record in August (even after the deadline sell-off) that he wanted to stay in Minnesota and had no desire to waive his no-trade clause, offseason reporting has suggested that if the Twins further subtract from the roster, he may change his tune.
Ultimately, Ryan’s availability (or lack thereof) will come down to the Pohlad family’s willingness to invest some of those deadline cost-savings back into the roster. The Twins’ current payroll projection ($95MM, per RosterResource) is nearly $50MM south of last season’s Opening Day figure. In theory, there’s room for Falvey to turn around and spend a fair bit of money, even if payroll won’t climb back into the $140-145MM range, but he doesn’t have final say over the budget.
If the Twins do make Ryan available, Tong is a sensible target as a potential headliner in the trade. The 22-year-old righty was hit hard in his first 18 2/3 MLB frames late in the season, but Tong’s blazing ascension up the Mets’ minor league ranks in 2024-25 catapulted him into the game’s top 50 overall prospects at Baseball America, MLB.com and FanGraphs.
Tong, a 2022 seventh-rounder, has laid waste to minor league lineups in each of the past two seasons, climbing from Low-A in early ’24 to the Mets’ big league rotation this past September. In 2024, the wiry right-hander pitched 131 innings with a 3.03 ERA, 34.2% strikeout rate and 10% walk rate as he climbed to Double-A. Tong returned to Double-A to begin the ’25 campaign and was bumped to Triple-A late in the season. He pitched a combined 113 2/3 minor league frames and recorded an immaculate 1.43 ERA with an eye-popping 40.5% strikeout rate against a 10.6% walk rate.
One way or another, next week’s Winter Meetings figure to bring some clarity on the Twins’ direction. No one is expecting them to dive headlong into the deep end of free agency, but if ownership is comfortable with even a diminished $120-125MM payroll, that might be enough to spur the front office into some midlevel additions in hopes that with some steps forward from a deluge of young big leaguers, a return to Wild Card contention is possible. If payroll is mandated to be kept under $100MM or pared back even further, however, then the prospect of trades involving Ryan, Lopez, Jeffers and even Buxton become far more realistic — if not likely.

If that’s the price they’re asking for a mid 3’s mid rotation guy, I’d rather hold onto Tong and roll the dice on him pitching front of the rotation baseball for me. This isn’t Tarik Skubal we’re talking about.
Joe Ryan is a #1 in most rotations and a solid #2 in rotations fronted by say Tarik or Skenes types, but tbh there’s not many in that league. #3 is a bad evaluation.
Look at his 2025 August and September splits. Injured? His starts from mid August on were not good.
Your opinions on my evaluation aside, he’s not a #1, which the Mets need to anchor their rotation with the young arms matriculation, and certainly not worth the #4 player in the system who just won pitcher of the year in the minors. Hard pass.
Just because you say he’s not doesn’t mean the guy wouldn’t front most rotations. He’s a Fried type, basically 1/1a, 2 at worst.
To say he’s not worth a pitcher who hasn’t proven anything yet in the majors is silly. Fans love to hug their prospects, but they’re just cards to be dealt. You cannot and should not hold them spiting yourself in the process.
Speaking of silly, there is no position in baseball that goes by the name “#1 starter”, so it strikes me as silly to talk about 1/1a, 2, etc. It’s just something that floats baseball fans’ boats. For the sake of discussion, every staff will have a best starter, a second best starter and so on. On a bad staff the best starter might be the fourth best on another team. I’ve never come across a consensus definition of what’s meant by a “#1 starter” derived from ERA, innings pitched, quality starts, etcetera. I just don’t think it helps flesh out whether a Tong for Ryan trade would be good for the Mets. I think he’s got a very high ceiling–fantastic stuff–but it’s potential whereas Ryan is a known quantity. A tough call.
Interesting, as a Twins fan , no way in hell Tong for Ryan straight up gets it done.
As of Auguat 1st Ryan had a low 2 Era and was a top 5 Cy young candidate in all of baseball.. sure the last 7 weeks or so went horribly.. but it’d take Tong
PlUS another top 5 or 7 guy in the Mets system quite easily I might add to get that deal going forward , in my honest opinion.
Absolutely this, anyone discounting Ryan is absolutely silly. Prospects are just trading cards until they actually do something sustainable in the bigs.
yeah no 😂
I think they want a top 50 prospect and some more.
Tong is a top 50.
Tong was 94th on MLB’s Top 100, which is the one that counts the most.
the one where he’s the highest…?
Yeah, I know.
So Jonah Tong, AJ Ewig, Jacob Reimer, Mitch Voit, and Ronny Mauricio. ]
How’s that?
He’s 46 right now.
Apologies, correct. I was looking at pre 25 season.
Sarcasm, yes?
It’s not going to take that much. That’s 4 of their top 10 prospects.
Much too much. Tong, NcNeil, Reimer
Twins want to cut payroll! 🤦♂️
Something like Tong, Wenninger & Morabito.
No F’n way. Major overpay. A five for 1 with 4 of the players being top 10 prospects for us is stupidity. Especially for a Pitcher and not an everyday player. I somewhat understand that overpay for Skubal who’s one of the top 3 SP’s in the game, but for just Ryan, a solid #2 SP no thanks. One major injury to Ryan and the trade is a complete disaster.
Astros27 must’ve been kidding.
Depends who you’re bidding against. Red Sox just gave up a haul for an oft-injured Oviedo.
There’s no “us”, Kenny. You don’t play for the Mets,
I was hoping Tong would get traded to the Red Sox.
Mets fans will scoff at Tong being suggested but this could be a solid move.
As a Mets fan, i’d be fine with this trade.
Mets should be in win now mode. Tong os starting 2026 in the minor leagues.
Personally, I think MN asks for more than just Tong for Ryan.
By the time Tong is a #2 (personally I doubt he’ll ever get there), lindor will be past his prime and who knows what the young guys will do.
And they’ll also be $180M into Soto after next season. That time is now.
I disagree. I’d rather trade Tong in division for Alcantara or Cabrera. Dealing Tong for Ryan seems lopsided in the Twins favor.
How? Ryan is a solid #2 on a very cheap deal for 2 seasons. The Mets could even extend him. We don’t know how Tong will turn out.
Ryan is better than Alcantara. Alacantra just has the sexier name because he once was a star and has since fallen off. Even though he got it together a bit in the second half he still wasn’t Joe Ryan.
If the Mets give up one of their young starters for 2 years of a veteran starter they better get an outfielder in the deal too.
If you mean Buxton, that’s just not reasonable.
Buxton is good but has been injured most of his career so i’m not too into him.. High probability it ends up a bust. But the Mets have infielders to trade if he waives the clause.
Mets need starting pitching bad. Tong is a good offer, but it’d be better to keep the new rotation in tact.
If the Mets could swing Joe Ryan it could be the best deal they’ve made of this ownership. Moving Jonah Tong+ would be a no-brainer to me, but we know that fans won’t think so.
Tong is a steep price to pay for two years of Joe Ryan. Ryan is a very good pitcher but there are starters on the market that would only cost you money right now. Ryan is probably better than Ranger Suarez or Framber Valdez but if the price is right on either of them (a big ‘if’), I’d rather go that route.
Eventually with all of the money that Cohen spends you need to balance the high-earners with cheap talent and Tong fits that bill. It’s an interesting situation for sure.
Also I don’t agree that it would have to be “Tong+”. Just Tong should be enough for Ryan. Again, Ryan is great but it’s only two years of him. Versus potentially seven years of control for Tong, who was named Baseball America’s Minor League Pitcher of the Year.
Garrett Crochet commanded 4 prospects and two of which were much higher than Tong with two of them position players alreasy inserted into the WSox lineup. Crochet is a more dominant pitcher in terms of stuff, of course, but Joe Ryan is pretty freaking solid. I highly doubt the Twins are letting him go for one prospect. I like him, but Tong hasn’t proven anything to be enough.
“Crochet is a more dominant pitcher in terms of stuff, of course, but Joe Ryan is pretty freaking solid.”
You are underselling this. The reason Crochet “commanded 4 prospects” is because he had elite stuff. He’s much better. He’s also three years younger than Ryan with a lot fewer innings on his arm (about 220 innings for Crochet vs over 1000 for Ryan). There’s really no comparison between Crochet and a “pretty solid” pitcher in Ryan, so I don’t know why people are using the return for Crochet as some kind of guide to what Ryan could get. It’s apples to oranges.
“I highly doubt the Twins are letting him go for one prospect.”
Then they’ll probably keep him, lol. If they’re expecting a Crochet-level haul, then Ryan ain’t going anywhere, especially not to the Mets, who have been reluctant to trade anyone from their farm since the PCA trade.
I didn’t say Crochet level haul, I’m just saying Tong+ which is absolutely reasonable. No one is trading the Mets a Ryan type just for Tong, that’s ludicrous again just based on other trades. Ryan is not a three prospect drop from Crochet. If they don’t get it from the Mets, surely someone will trade for him, gladly.
Rct, who’s the last pitcher of Ryan’s quality to sign a deal with “the right price”? They cost $30,000,000+ annually in free agency.
Maybe not this year but in 2027 Tong may, and will probably be just as good a SP as Ryan. Ryan will then look for $30 M a year in 2028 where if we keep Tong he’s still under control and cheaper than Ryan. Unless it’s Skubal I’m keeping Tong. McLean and Tong are the two prospects that are #2 projected SP’s or better. Sproat, Wenninger, Santucci, and Watson can be used for Ryan but not Tong
have to be willing to move Tong for Joe Ryan.
Sorry but that’s an overpay on the Mets part imo. I’d rather trade Tong in division for Alcantara or Cabrera than to headline him for a guy with much more mileage on his arm, who isn’t a #1, and struggled down the stretch last season.
I’d rather take my chances on Tong figuring it out than to trade him just to trade him.
Even trading Tong for Ryan alone would seem to be an overpay IMO. Tong could very well be a better pitcher than Ryan in another year. Health is always a concern with any pitcher, but Joe Ryan has had his share of health issues in years past as well. I get that Ryan is more proven, but I wouldn’t trade someone like Tong, who is seemingly so close to MLB ready for a pitcher like Ryan when the years of control are so different.
Check out 10centBeerNight’s comment right below you. Perfect answer to this.
I wasn’t that impressed tbh. He’s not McLain. And Ryan is excellent and on a very team friendly deal, which Mets can extend.
Can’t prospect hug. Remember the Kelenic outrage? lasted about 4 years.
I am by no means a prospect hugger and completely understand that Tong was called up early last year and needs just a little bit of seasoning in the minors still, but my goodness the stuff is high end and I would be very, very careful on moving him – or Sproat for that matter. It will be interesting to see what the Mets decide to do.
Tong looked pretty awful in the majors. He was a 7th round pick as well. Joe Ryan is a borderline ace, definitely a 2. Either the Mets want to go for it or they don’t. Prospect hugging is not the way to do that with Lindor nearing end of his prime and Soto being in the middle of it.
This comment should be for RyanD44’s right above you!
Pitchers are a bit easier to project than hitters – you can see when a pitcher has big league stuff. Health is obviously the biggest concern with pitchers. With hitters, it’s a very mental game if they don’t come out of the gates doing well.
I think Tong will turn out fine, but Joe Ryan fine? Not sure. Meanwhile, you’d get an ace or ace lite (like a Fried) at worst. It’s a pretty easy one imo.
Ryan is good but his #’s don’t jump off the page at you, his WHIP is elite but ERA+ 111 and career 3.79 era. I think Tong could very easily be better than that.
Big difference between Kelenic and Tong. Kelenic’s hype was based on his draft position (6th overall) and his age (18). And he was the centerpiece for bringing in Cano and Diaz.
Tong’s hype is based on minor league performance. He was a 7th rounder who has worked his way through all levels of the minors (albeit quickly) and up to the majors. It’s a little less prospect hugging when a guy has actually shown some performance.
All true yes. And surely every fan base gets emotionally invested in prospect potential. To the eye test – this is an bigtime trait of NYM fans. You have to give to get. Perhaps not Tong, certainly not McLean, but some of these guys will have to be dealt to get the impact players that are needed. IMO they’ve waited a bit too long on the middle infielders logjam. Could be the return offers were meh. Vientos with his poor first half etc.
@10centBeerNight: “You have to give to get.”
Totally agree, and we saw this at the deadline with trades like the Rogers trade with the Giants.
However, it’s way too early in the offseason, imo, for the Mets to make a move like this. Suarez, Valdez, Imai, King, etc. are all available right now and you don’t have to trade a top prospect for them.
It isn’t merely prospect hugging. The guy ranked 29th in fWAR Llast year when Peterson ranked 28th. His value is that he is cheap, because he clearly isn’t an ace. The Mets strength is that they can take on money to save talent. This has to be a bogus story because it goes against their thinking.
the prospects need love too you know
2 years of cheap control on solid starter Ryan is probably worthy of 70% of the return it took to land 2yrs of ace Crochet. Twins can fill in what prospects that realistically gets them in their asks.
Two years of Ryan at about $12-15M*… yeah, I’d say most everyone is interested in him.
*arbitration rates may vary
If i’m the Twins, Tong for Ryan is a no, Tong for Lopez is a yes
Tong + Mauricio for Ryan equals yes.
Mauricio holds no value
There’s no chance the Mets would be interested in paying Tong plus 2/$43 million for Lopez when there are starters out there that they could sign for just the cash.
Tong + for Buxton and Ryan.
Buxton can DH along w some OF play to keep him healthy which gives them Polar Bear insurance.
RYAN steps in and they have a TOR arm but they need at least 1 more impact starting pitcher to go w there young arms.
If they somehow bring Pete back.
Lindor/ Soto/ alonso/ Buxton middle of the order is crazy dangerous and probably best in the division
Tong is not getting anywhere near enough for both of them
He said Tong+
My bad, would probably need to be a big plus though right?
This trade proposal is non sensical. Why would the Twins ever entertain that?
Because regardless of him being a Met, Tong is a consensus Top 100 prospect and a top 10 overall pitching prospect. Those guys rarely become available and have massive amount of value. Having watched Tong last year – despite not being MLB ready and called up WAY, WAY too soon – he projects probably at worst as a #3 starter and is more likely a strong #2 with ace-like potential. Of the three Mets pitching prospects from last year, McLean is the one I would say has the most “ace-like” potential; and aside from Skenes, I don’t think there is a player (including Skubal) they would consider trading him for. Tong and Sproat are different stories, though I would guess/think they are available in trade for only a handful of starters (Skubal, Hunter Greene, Skenes – I am aware he is unavailable; possibly one of the Mariners pitchers). Twins may like Tong, but not sure the Mets would move him for Ryan – even if the Mets are intrigued.
So, Joe Ryan to the Blue Jays. Got it!
As a reds fan I’m sometimes reluctant to wanna give up prospects, but you guys are a fans of a big spending team you shouldn’t have the same fear.
Tong is a good place to start but wouldn’t be near enough. Look at what the Red Sox gave up for Crochet.. It’s probably won’t be as much but it’s going to take a package that has Mets fans saying ouch. Plus, it’s not like they’re the only ones interested, so you have to outbid the other4-8 teams that’d want him and have the prospects to make the Twins say yes.
Crochet is much better than Ryan. If Tong alone isn’t “near enough” for Ryan then he’s not getting traded to the Mets. The Mets haven’t built up their farm over the last five years just to gut it for two years of Joe Ryan.
More power to you if you believe that…
You build up your farm system to trade for guys like Ryan if you’re the Mets.
Ryan would be a great fit for the Mets, especially with the young kids. Strong #2 starter who has been durable. If it were a Tong and a lesser prospect they should do that deal in a heart beat.
He’s going to be #1 on the Mets.
I like both Ryan and Peralta. But Ryan is locked in for 2027 barring injury. They could lose 2 starters next winter to free agency – Holmes and Peterson. Peralta would be a third possibile loss if Mets trade for Peralta.
Next week will be another team interested in Joe Ryan…when every potential contending team is interested in Joe Ryan.
Sign me up for a Tong for Ryan swap as a Mets fan. The Mets are is the position do make a lot of things happen this winter like rarely before, given their prospect depth. I’m sure they’d have to add something since Ryan has such a team friendly contract but the Mets are in great position to do that.
I’d rather manipulate salary to do something more well-rounded…like offloading McNeil
Sort of like Severino and Soderstrom… bail out the As (look at Severino’s splits away), send along McNeil (plus $5m), maybe Acuna and then a few prospects that are in excess…Morabito and Watson.
That said, Ryan is a solid target. I just wouldn’t give up that much (Tong, plus Jett, plus Wenninger, plus Reimer as someone suggested elsewhere).
As aren’t trading soderstrom
Probably realized brewers aren’t taking 25 year old very hittable fastball sproatt for freddy
Is Tong and one of Vientos, Acuña, or Mauricio enough?
Twins still trying to compete, so getting younger players doesn’t make as much sense as young MLB players like these.
Mets are holding their position player top prospects tightly such as Benge and Williams.
Maybe Clifford is another piece, although he could be a big part of the 2026 Mets as well.
No. And they want MLB ready prospects or close to MLB ready.
Nobody wants vientos, acuna or Mauricio
“Nobody wants vientos, acuna or Mauricio”
Patently false.
Every team already has their own version of these players. Failure to launch prospects with no position. The type who are let go during their arbitration years. Could they breakout? Sure but so can every other no name player
Oh, I didn’t realize every team has a guy who can put up 3.1 WAR in 111 games on their bench
Those 3 players combined have that 1 starter quality season and 1 bench player quality season. All the remaining years are BAD, negative quality, or injured. Hold onto the 1 good season and believe it will bring something back in return
“Those 3 players combined have that 1 starter quality season and 1 bench player quality season”.
That’s just something you made up and its non pertinent.
“All the remaining years are BAD, negative quality, or injured.”
That’s more unsubstantiated nonsense. You’re talking about 3 players who are 23, 24 and 25 years old … far from the maximum productivity of the average pro ball player.
“Hold onto the 1 good season and believe it will bring something back in return”
This is the MOST ludicrous of your nonsense. By your logic you’d trade away or release every player with a down year. You’d be the worst talent evaluator in the history of the world and your team would be an atrocity.
Acuna’s never been “launched”, meaning getting a chance to play every day for a month or so. If he learns to hit, he’s a star. Great fielder and runner.
As a Twins fan I’d go for Tong, Vientos, and a lotto ticket type low level prospect as a return.
Buckle up, it’s ____ is interested in _____ season!
Let the kids pitch in NY, McLean, Sproat, Tong and Scott (when he’s healthy). Between Holmes (pen) Manaea, Senga and Peterson you can bullpen one or two and keep the others in the rotation and acclimate the young arms by way of 6 man rotation.
I feel like this take is spot on. I’ve been saying they need to consider the full time 6 man rotation, and the 2026 roster with the kids pitching looks like the perfect time. If we can pay only money for a for a front facing start (NOT Valdez, the guys a head case), this could be the year.
Hasn’t it been really quiet on Ryan until this?
Maybe by giving this to Hayman they’re trying to to move the needle on Peralta, since this is coming on the heels of the “Brewers cracking the door open” report?
It is clear the old-rich (and painfully naive) Pohlads oversold these “minority owners” after they realized nouveau-riche Ishbia used them to leverage Reinsdorf.
Unfortunately, us Twins fans are left with a short-sighted Pohlad generation with all the business acumen of Brad Pitt in ‘Burn After Reading’ and Adam Sandler in ‘Uncut Gems’. Twins will continue the trend of reactive austerity, unwittingly feeding into the devaluing of their only remaining valuable asset – Pablo, Ryan, Buxton (and likely anyone else not prearb) will be traded before opening day, and all of MLB will be shocked at how little the team gets in prospect capital. Bulk of return will be cash considerations to help cover a fraction of Pohlad’s commercial real estate debt. Whatever they DO get back will be pittance compared to the revenue they lose from fans. These diminishing returns will force them to accept whatever lowball offer they can get for the team.
Almost karmic for a family whose fortune started by foreclosing on farmers and families.
Good riddance.
Hey Dorkus is that your phone number after your name? I can pass it along to some people if you’re looking for a date.
Sure is. Area code 911
If the Twins trade Ryan, Lopez, Buxton && Jeffers they really could get a huge jumpstart on a rebuild
Can we switch out Tong for Sproat ? Sproat, Mauricio and Morabito for Ryan and Buxton,
No
Why would Minnesota want that? Thats not even enough for Ryan not alone Buxton. Small market teams arent your minor league feeder to dump failed prospects for stars.
Not even enough for Lopez. A Mets fan for sure.
So…does a package from NYY of Jasson Dominguez, Ben Hess, and Henry Lalane, get Ryan from the Twins?
No, none of those are even top 100……
Dominguez graduated. Let me give you a realistic package.
Jasson Dominguez, Carlos Lagrange, Ben Hess, and Ben Rice would be more realistic.
Haha you’re funny. The Twins front office would laugh their heads off at that pathetic offer and hang up the phone
I tried. Lemme try again.
Dominguez, Lagrange, Hess, Rice, Schittler, Kyle Carr, and Will Warren.
Hope adding Schittler, Carr, and Warren was enough.
Twins trade Buxton and Lopez to the Braves for Caminiti, Fuentes, Elder, R.Munoz, and Clohisy who says no?
Braves. They give up too much of their future. Interesting trade though.
Jonah Tong should be off the trade market …we have the pitching…all you need is to spend on Famber!
This would be a good trade for both teams. Twins rebuilding and Mets competing. Just makes sense if they pull the trigger.
For what it’s worth getting Joe would help the pain of getting rid of Nolan many years ago!!!!
Boston can offer the best package for Ryan or anyone else for that matter.
Mets missed playoffs because Stearns signed Montas (bid against himself for what? Guy is horrendous and hadn’t been good for years). And he made Holmes a starter. A solid reliever who predictably by the second half could only deliver 4 innings maybe 5 per start. He had 2 QS in the second half. Killed their pen. Manae was an injury that was out of their control. Senga is soft. choked in 2024 playoffs, hurt covering a friggin bag, then when needed most couldn’t even get right in the minors. He’s good until we need a workhorse or solid dependable leader. Senga needs to go too. He’ll have a glorious ERA after June. But the big spot? guy is made of peper.
But the offense was top ten in baseball.
I like Tong. But Tong with his frame and 100 lb frame will end up being like a Steven Matz. He’ll have stretches of wow. But ultimately will throw QS seldomly. Ryan is better than Tong. Even if Tong has a higher upside, it will be a short lived peak. Joe Ryan made 30 starts in 2025. He K’v over a batter per inning, had a good ERA and an excellent WHIP. Is still not quite old and will give the Mets what they need….quality length. Tong will not give quality length. Tong will have a good ERA with 0 QS, because they’ll remove him at pitch 85 every night.
The twins would be crazy not to take two of the A’s bolstered minor/major league outfielders. Colby Thomas and Denzel Clarke come to mind. Buxton and Thomas mashing and buxton and Clarke as a defensive duo would be second to none in the league
I don’t want Ryan traded, like most Twins fans. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t like Tong as part of the return either.
A SP with a 10% BB rate is never going to excite me. I’d like him better than when they got Abel who also has a too high BB% but that’s really not saying much. Guys with this high of a walk rate very rarely work out long term (as a SP). I don’t want to trade Ryan for someone who will likely be a reliever.
Tong alone by himself is not remotely close enough. These Mets fans are delusional thinking it’s a one for one