Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

D’Backs Acquire Cahill, Breslow From A’s

By Dan Mennella | December 10, 2011 at 10:10am CDT

SATURDAY: Slusser reports that the cash considerations going to the Diamondbacks will be "a couple of hundred thousand dollars."

FRIDAY: As was rumored earlier today, the Diamondbacks have acquired pitchers Trevor Cahill and Craig Breslow from the Athletics for minor leaguers Jarrod Parker, Collin Cowgill and Ryan Cook, according to Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle (Twitter links) and Steve Gilbert of MLB.com (Twitter). The Diamondbacks will also receive cash from Oakland, tweets Nick Piecoro of the Arizona Republic.

The centerpiece of the trade for Arizona is Cahill, a right-handed starter who has logged more than 175 innings in each of his three seasons as a Major Leaguer. The groundballer (53.3% career rate) is under team control at least through 2015 and perhaps through 2017, depending on two club options. He'll join Ian Kennedy and Daniel Hudson at the top of the D'Backs' rotation, with Josh Collmenter and perhaps (or not) Joe Saunders at the back end.

On a conference call with reporters on Friday night, D'Backs GM Kevin Towers said the timing was right to make a move of this nature:

“A lot of it is just the depth that we have in the system. Certainly, Jarrod Parker was a tough piece to give up, but with Trevor Bauer, Tyler Skaggs and Charles Brewer, we feel we’ve got depth in the starting rotation – also, Wade Miley. We see a window here, specifically in the NL West. We’re kind of in a go-for-it mode.”

Clearly, Cahill will be counted on as one of the mainstays of the D'Backs' rotation, but it wasn't long ago he seemed destined to remain in Oakland after inking a multiyear extension in April:

"I defintely thought I’d be with them a bit longer. But their history is, they usually keep guys when they don’t make too much, then trade them off for prospects. I thought I’d be there longer, but I'm glad to be part of a team that’s headed in the right direction."

Breslow, a lefty reliever, kicked around earlier in his career before latching on with the A's the past three seasons. He's posted a career 3.80 FIP, and with no significant lefty/righty splits, Towers said Breslow will likely be used as a swing lefty out of Kirk Gibson's bullpen in 2012. He is eligible for free agency after 2013.

In Parker, Cowgill and Cook, the A's get three prospects who all have far less than a full season of service time. Of them, Parker, a right-handed starter, is regarded by scouts as having the highest ceiling. Now 24, Parker pitched mostly in the minors in 2011 after missing all of 2010 due to Tommy John surgery. He was ranked No. 19 in Keith Law's top 50 minor league prospects in July.

Cowgill is a 25-year-old outfielder who made his Major League debut in 2011 after posting a .383 career on-base percentage in parts of four minor league seasons. Cook was a starter in the minors before being converted to relief work in 2011. He has a "strong arm, chance for a good slider," tweets Kevin Goldstein of Baseball Prospectus.

John Gambadoro of Sports 620 KTAR in Phoenix first tweeted the rumored trade, and Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com, Piecoro, Slusser and Gilbert all filled in with details.

Share 6 Retweet 65 Send via email0

Arizona Diamondbacks Oakland Athletics Transactions Craig Breslow Jarrod Parker Trevor Cahill

MLB Reinstates Manny Ramirez
Main
King’s Latest: Yankees, Fielder, Rangers, McGehee
View Comments (251)
Post a Comment

251 Comments

  1. Alex Mack

    14 years ago

    I’ll give this one to oakland when parker wins the CY someday.  but until then, dbacks improve.

    Reply
    • Steven Resnick

      14 years ago

      Diamondbacks get a capable lefty in the pen and yet Cahill was overvalued (overrated) by the A’s. 2/3 seasons he could not find the strikezone 154 walks in those two seasons alone, Diamondbacks clearly lost on this one as Parker has much better potential than Cahill. 

      Reply
      • Matt

        14 years ago

        Why doesn’t anyone seem to understand that when trading with prospects, a higher value always has to be given up?  The team giving up the prospects are paying for production now, and all prospect development is at least a little bit of a crapshoot.  That being said, I think you are undervaluing Cahill and overvaluing Parker.

        Reply
      • cubs223425

        14 years ago

        I agree, but I also think they wanted someone to pitch NOW, as they have 2 better SP prospects to pair with Kennedy and Hudson long-term in Bauer and Skaggs. This gives them possibly the best 5-man long-term in the NL, if not all of baseball.

        Most teams would LOVE to call Trevor Cahill the worst pitcher in their long-term rotation.

        Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        You write as if a 23 year old is master of his craft. Calm down, Cahill will be very good for AZ.

        Reply
        • Joe Valenti

          14 years ago

          the way i see it. they are the same age and cahill is currently the better pitcher. why, because cahill is a major leaguer, does he have to have hit his ceiling while parker still has potential just because he is a prospect?

          Reply
      • slamsand

        14 years ago

        You’re overrating Parker. The guy has had 1 MLB start. Cahill has a good track record in the majors, and is only 24.

        Reply
      • slamsand

        14 years ago

        You’re overrating Parker. The guy has had 1 MLB start. Cahill has a good track record in the majors, and is only 24.

        Reply
  2. renegadeisback

    14 years ago

    That’s a pretty light package and I’m not even a Cahill fan.

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      Agreed, from an A’s fan perspective this deal is meh. Cahill will probably win the Cy Young next year, sigh.

      Reply
      • slamsand

        14 years ago

        Sorry, but this deal is worse than meh. Pretty disturbing that Beane has gotten this bad. I still haven’t watched Moneyball yet, and likely never will. (Although the book was great)

        Reply
      • slamsand

        14 years ago

        Sorry, but this deal is worse than meh. Pretty disturbing that Beane has gotten this bad. I still haven’t watched Moneyball yet, and likely never will. (Although the book was great)

        Reply
        • Marky

          14 years ago

          I cannot believe the A’s sent money to AZ in this deal. Really bad move by the A’s here. 

          Reply
      • YanksFanSince78

        14 years ago

        Is it me or are almost every trade scenario mentioned on mlbtr end up being EXTREMELY mediocre?

        Haha…I mean A’s fans were demanding Montero + Betances + more.

        PS to Cashman: We couldn’t beat this deal without giving up either Montero or Banuelos?

        Reply
  3. notsureifsrs

    14 years ago

    works pretty well for both sides. i like parker’s potential better than cahill’s, but the diamondbacks have two elite SP prospects behind him and are already contenders. cahill provides cost certainty for 4-6 years, upside, and plenty of groundballs in a homer-friendly ballpark

    Reply
    • Sniderlover

      14 years ago

      Thanks for summing up my thoughts!

      Reply
      • Bluejaysnation

        14 years ago

        Me too!! Saves me time typing.

        Reply
  4. rfffr

    14 years ago

    parker’s easily the best prospect in oakland’s system

    Reply
  5. BrandonDbacks

    14 years ago

    Dbacks get better now. AND they still have Skaggs and bauer in the system.
    Kennedy-Hudson-Cahill for years to come sounds good.

    Reply
    • Joe L

      14 years ago

      Haven’t you been so against this trade on the other thread?? 

      Reply
      • BrandonDbacks

        14 years ago

        Yeah I changed my mind. haha

        Reply
        • Marvin Marshall

          14 years ago

          I was okay with the trade when it was Parker/Cowgill/Miley. Now I absolutely love it with -Miley &  + cook.

          Reply
        • Bombercules 2

          14 years ago

          I changed my mind too, mostly because I saw they were planning on getting rid of Saunders.

          Reply
  6. Marky

    14 years ago

    “Another player”…if its Bauer A’s fans needn’t bother with Dec 25.

    Reply
    • TheWoodyD

      14 years ago

      It’s Ryan Cook. 🙁

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        That means Bailey’s time in Oakland is done.  

        Its not as good as I’d hoped, I’d have hung onto to Cahill for another year but its not a terrible haul.

        Reply
        • Steven Resnick

          14 years ago

          Means nothing and even if the A’s trade Bailey, it better be for a position player that can actually hit. 

          Reply
  7. oaklandfan22

    14 years ago

    wow unbelievable A’s what is this?

    Reply
    • HummBaby

      14 years ago

      It’s Billy Beane raising a middle finger to the Giants.

      Reply
      • corey23

        14 years ago

        I’m hoping it means a new f’n stadium.  Oakland or SJ i dont even care anymore. 

        Reply
      • Matt

        14 years ago

        Haha. Did Beane give them a small “Screw over the Giants” discount?

        Reply
      • Matt

        14 years ago

        Haha. Did Beane give them a small “Screw over the Giants” discount?

        Reply
  8. Mr_Anderson1017

    14 years ago

    Not Ryan Cook!

    Reply
  9. Marky

    14 years ago

    Oh man, its Cook….its bye bye Andrew Bailey then.

    Reply
    • Diablo 2

      14 years ago

      Man if the A’s are on there Cali kush right now Angels should jump on board and offer them Brad Mills for Bailey so the pen can get stronger

      Reply
      • cookmeister

        14 years ago

        that would have to be some deadly kush

        Reply
        • Diablo 2

          14 years ago

          Very

          Reply
        • Yankees420

          14 years ago

          Well, you know they have it up in Oakland.

          Reply
  10. qudjy1

    14 years ago

    I cant say i love it as a Dback fan.   I guess i overvalue prospects..  sigh..   I like Parker.

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      I cant say i love it as a A’s fan.   I guess i dont overvalue prospects..  sigh..   I like Cahill.

      Reply
      • qudjy1

        14 years ago

        hehe – what does it mean if neither team’s fans like the deal?   Fair deal??  haha.

        Reply
  11. vinniemiller

    14 years ago

    Kinda light package for Cahill alone, not to mention also throwing in Breslow

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      I really don’t think this is a great deal, if Bauer got added then yes but now its kind of meh without him.

      Reply
      • whatever

        14 years ago

        Isn’t Parker a top 25 prospect?

        Reply
        • Marky

          14 years ago

          Maybe, after TJ who knows? Cahill was BA’s #11 best prospect in 08 then A’s rushed him to the bigs in 09 after a mere 6 games at AA, but now people here say he sucks and lacks a high ceiling because of that, so….meh.

          Reply
        • Marky

          14 years ago

          Maybe, after TJ who knows? Cahill was BA’s #11 best prospect in 08 then A’s rushed him to the bigs in 09 after a mere 6 games at AA, but now people here say he sucks and lacks a high ceiling because of that, so….meh.

          Reply
  12. Matt

    14 years ago

    Can Cowgill play CF? How is he defensively?

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      He will very most likely be the A’s CF until Grant Green is ready.

      Reply
      • Matt

        14 years ago

        I guess that’s good.  Geez, by ST we’ll have a dozen minor leaguers vying for the 4 OF spots.

        Reply
    • qudjy1

      14 years ago

      Pretty darn good on defense.   I think he will be an ok offensive player as well.   He is just a guy.   I wouldnt expect too much, although i dont think he is as bad an offensive player as he showed in AZ. (Inconsistent playing time a factor??)

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        I think he’s a little more than “just a guy”, Cook would take that honor in this deal, Beane’s been after Cowgill since he drafted him and he’s been trying to trade for him ever since. Beane’s targets sometimes pan out, sometimes they don’t.

        Reply
        • qudjy1

          14 years ago

          We watched him get worked over pretty good last year…   I know it wasnt consistent ABs at all, but there were some ugly moments…   I will root for him, because i like how he plays, but im pretty certain he is just a guy.

          Reply
          • Marvin Marshall

            14 years ago

            Cowgill is not “just a guy”. He was stuck as the 4th OF with inconsistent ABs in a Dbacks uniform. 

            Reply
          • Marvin Marshall

            14 years ago

            Cowgill is not “just a guy”. He was stuck as the 4th OF with inconsistent ABs in a Dbacks uniform. 

            Reply
          • Marky

            14 years ago

            I’d be with you on that if Beane hadn’t tried to get him multiple times. I still trust his judgement on younger players. 

            I also think he had no future in that OF and was treated as such, I always say if players don’t get at least 3 months of everyday playing time, after being everyday players in the minors, it often screws with their psyche.

            Reply
          • Marky

            14 years ago

            I’d be with you on that if Beane hadn’t tried to get him multiple times. I still trust his judgement on younger players. 

            I also think he had no future in that OF and was treated as such, I always say if players don’t get at least 3 months of everyday playing time, after being everyday players in the minors, it often screws with their psyche.

            Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Cowgill starts in most OFs

      Reply
      • qudjy1

        14 years ago

        Nah.   Probably not.

        Reply
        • vtadave

          14 years ago

          Probably not, but I saw him plenty when he played in Reno and he’s a very good defender with a good batting eye. Stats were horribly inflated by the environment, but he could still be an average starting OF.

          Reply
      • diesel2410

        14 years ago

        Thought you said Cowgirl at first….maybe I need glasses

        Reply
  13. TDKnies

    14 years ago

    Cool.  Think I like this deal for both teams.  D’backs get a pretty good groundball (super important) SP and a serviceable lefty reliever.  A’s get super pitching prospect, a meh OF prospect, and relief prospect which is usually kind of a crapshoot.

    Reply
  14. The_BiRDS

    14 years ago

    woop woop

    Reply
  15. Leo Ramos

    14 years ago

    the i think the dbacks paid to much for breslow, but the A´S lost whit ryan cook, he´s realy, realy   bad pitcher

    Reply
    • qudjy1

      14 years ago

      Cook is NASTY when he is throwing strikes.   

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        I hope so, he’s probably going to be the A’s closer next year.

        Reply
        • FamousGrouse

          14 years ago

          I think De Los Santos will be the A’s closer.

          Reply
          • Snoochies8

            14 years ago

            or balfour, if they keep him this offseason. 

            Reply
          • Marky

            14 years ago

            I think its a battle between those two and maybe Devine if he’s still around, that will be won in ST.

            Reply
          • Marky

            14 years ago

            I think its a battle between those two and maybe Devine if he’s still around, that will be won in ST.

            Reply
        • FamousGrouse

          14 years ago

          I think De Los Santos will be the A’s closer.

          Reply
        • Marvin Marshall

          14 years ago

          The closer for the A’s AAA team.

          Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        I hope so, he’s probably going to be the A’s closer next year.

        Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Cook got absolutely lit up the two very short stints he was witht he bigs this last year. That being said, until then he absolutely dominated and will probably be just fine on a team that has the time to let him grow a bit. The Dbacks paid out just about right most likely. Parker will be solid for the A’s and be even friendlier contract-wise than Cahill. A starting OFer (likely CF) in Cowgill makes it a pretty decent haul both directions.

      Breslow has a decent gb% so I can get on board with him. We needed another lefty, but he’s a soft-tosser in a hitter’s park. Ugh.

      Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Cook got absolutely lit up the two very short stints he was witht he bigs this last year. That being said, until then he absolutely dominated and will probably be just fine on a team that has the time to let him grow a bit. The Dbacks paid out just about right most likely. Parker will be solid for the A’s and be even friendlier contract-wise than Cahill. A starting OFer (likely CF) in Cowgill makes it a pretty decent haul both directions.

      Breslow has a decent gb% so I can get on board with him. We needed another lefty, but he’s a soft-tosser in a hitter’s park. Ugh.

      Reply
  16. Satoshi9227

    14 years ago

    Excellent deal for the A’s. Cahill is extremely ovverated. He’s a #3 pitcher at best. No K’s, too many BB’s, a lot of HR. Even his ERA is mediocre aside from 2010. Parker has ace upside. The other two aren’t great but still, very good job Beane.

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      So what Ive gathered from posts like this is: if you are rushed to the majors when you should be at AAA all year, no matter what happens good or bad, people will use that against you. 

      Stop saying a 23 year old who actually starts 30+ games a year is overrated. Cahill will be great in AZ. Groundball pitcher, filthy sinker, only 23 years old and still learning at the big league level but will be dominant for long periods of time. As an A’s fan, we’ve heard this Parker story before, only the name was Dan Meyer last time.

      Reply
      • qudjy1

        14 years ago

        I hope the league switch helps him as well – away from the DH.   Park change will NOT help him, but his GB tendencies may make park less a factor than other pitchers coming to AZ.

        Reply
        • Marky

          14 years ago

          AZ’s got an OF made of gold glovers and solid defense all around the diamond, good chance Cahill’s ERA drops under 3.00 next year.

          Reply
          • thegrayrace

            14 years ago

            Possible if only because he’ll be facing the offenses of the Dodgers, Giants and Padres around a dozen times…

            Reply
      • qudjy1

        14 years ago

        I hope the league switch helps him as well – away from the DH.   Park change will NOT help him, but his GB tendencies may make park less a factor than other pitchers coming to AZ.

        Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      So what Ive gathered from posts like this is: if you are rushed to the majors when you should be at AAA all year, no matter what happens good or bad, people will use that against you. 

      Stop saying a 23 year old who actually starts 30+ games a year is overrated. Cahill will be great in AZ. Groundball pitcher, filthy sinker, only 23 years old and still learning at the big league level but will be dominant for long periods of time. As an A’s fan, we’ve heard this Parker story before, only the name was Dan Meyer last time.

      Reply
    • YanksFanSince78

      14 years ago

      At age 23, Cahill has time to develop into a true #2.

      I really don’t get Beane though. Cahill was signed to a team friendly deal and could’ve been kept for a modest 3/$16.7 mil. He had 3 full seasons before he had to worry about him being expensive. At what point do you attempt to compete?

      Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        14 years ago

        he’s been open about waiting for the new ballpark for quite awhile

        Reply
      • vtadave

        14 years ago

        A true #2 that pitches in the 80s? Meh….not sure there.

        Reply
        • Ferrariman

          14 years ago

          does that really matter that much?  What sinkerballers do you know that throw mid 90s…hell even low 90s.  Brandon Webb won a Cy Young throwing 80s sinkers.

          Reply
          • Yankees420

            14 years ago

            I was thinking the exact same thing.  Webb was an ace and never averaged a fastball velocity over 89, it’s sad he’s fallen so far due to injuries.

            Reply
  17. Steven Resnick

    14 years ago

    Landing Cowgill means Sweeney is out of the lineup, hallelujah! 

    Reply
    • oaklandfan22

      14 years ago

      How do u not want sweeney in the lineup he is way better then cowgill!

      Reply
    • oaklandfan22

      14 years ago

      How do u not want sweeney in the lineup he is way better then cowgill!

      Reply
  18. Johnson Doephis

    14 years ago

    Not sure how Cahill is viewed as any better than Jarrod Parker, but good for the A’s to get him.

    Reply
  19. slasher016 2

    14 years ago

    A’s get a close or ready for majors closer, a pitching prospect with good upside, and a decent piece in the outfielder for Cahill, who has pitched like an ace at times.   I think it’s a pretty fair deal.

    Reply
    • rfffr

      14 years ago

      cook’s control is lacking.

      Reply
    • rfffr

      14 years ago

      cook’s control is lacking.

      Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      Youre probably the most right. No team got hosed here, but both sides feel underwhelmed. 

      Reply
      • jamesa-2

        14 years ago

        I feel underwhelmed, but I think only because of all the previously bandied about names that eventually became Cook.

        A lot of people seem to think Parker is a big question mark and underrate Cowgill.

        Parker has more upside than Cahill but needs to play up to it. He’ll still make the rotation though. And Cowgill is a solid big league OFer. Cowgill for Breslow and Cook/Parker for Cahill seems just about right. If Parker and Cook both play up to potential, the A’s are sitting nice. If they both play to something a bit under, then I think the Dbacks are probably the winners here.

        Solid trade though.

        Reply
        • Marky

          14 years ago

          I agree Breslow/Cowgill is a good trade, but Parker/Cook for Cahill is a terrible trade for the A’s. AZ needed to add a piece here for me to like this deal for Oakland. 

          Reply
      • oaktownmagic

        14 years ago

        I think both sides feel underwhelmed because as baseball fans we are all hoping for the Haren trade every time.  Its like winning a car on the price is right and the curtain opens to be a  Ford Fiesta and you saw corvettes handed out on previous shows.  Still nice but you want more.

        People have a propensity to value something they have at a higher value than they would actually pay for the very same item.

        Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      Youre probably the most right. No team got hosed here, but both sides feel underwhelmed. 

      Reply
    • Matt

      14 years ago

      If any young pitcher replaces Bailey, its De Los Santos.

      Reply
  20. Satoshi9227

    14 years ago

    Cahill has never pitched like an ace UNLESS you only look at ERA. His peripherals have been bad in ever year he has pitched.

    Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      14 years ago

      he’s never been advertised as an ace. few even think of him as having ace potential anymore. he’s going to be a #3 this year in AZ and his upside is a good #2 with a team-friendly contract

      gotta give up talent to get it. dbacks fans can take solace in bauer and skaggs — two guys most organizations would kill to have even one of — while watching their big league club make the playoffs again in 2012

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        These AZ fans are being mighty greedy, huh? Imagine if you were an A’s fan right now—-no wait, take that noose off from around your neck!

        Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        These AZ fans are being mighty greedy, huh? Imagine if you were an A’s fan right now—-no wait, take that noose off from around your neck!

        Reply
    • $14878247

      14 years ago

      Exactly this considering the park he plays in too.

      He does not strike out a lot of guys at all and he walks way too many to be that kind of pitcher.

      Both him and Gio are way overrated. Gio will get mashed if he plays in the AL east, just look at that terrible BB rate. None of these guys have done anything special, I don’t understand why Beane is asking so much for them.

      Reply
      • thegrayrace

        14 years ago

        “I don’t understand why Beane is asking so much for them.”

        … because he might get what he’s asking?

        Reply
      • baycommuter

        14 years ago

        They’re different situations. Cahill’s sinker isn’t totally reliable and may get mashed, but Gio has a wonderful fastball-curve combination and won’t. Gio’s issue is whether he can reduce his walks.

        Reply
    • $14878247

      14 years ago

      Exactly this considering the park he plays in too.

      He does not strike out a lot of guys at all and he walks way too many to be that kind of pitcher.

      Both him and Gio are way overrated. Gio will get mashed if he plays in the AL east, just look at that terrible BB rate. None of these guys have done anything special, I don’t understand why Beane is asking so much for them.

      Reply
  21. Alex 18

    14 years ago

    Wow, I think the A’s got ripped off on this one.

    Reply
    • Satoshi9227

      14 years ago

      I have no idea why.

      Reply
      • Johnson Doephis

        14 years ago

        “dude proven stud that almost won a Cy Young for some worthless prospects” – My best talk radio impression.

        Reply
        • jamesa-2

          14 years ago

          Parker will be in your rotation next year. Cook might or might not be an option as a Closer, and a starting OF in Cowgill with doubles power, good speed and an accurate arm. Exactly where is the lack of value?

          Reply
          • Marky

            14 years ago

            Cahill is signed until 2017 and will probably be flipped for more than this in 2 years after putting up good numbers on a contending team. The A’s needed Bauer or Skaggs to make them feel good about this deal. 

            Reply
            • whatever

              14 years ago

              I can see your point on Skaggs but Bauer was 100% not going to happen

              Reply
              • Marky

                14 years ago

                apparently the dbax originally asked for cahill and gio, but the a’s insisted on skaggs and az said no. if thats true holy crap the dbax made a booboo.

                Reply
                • Yankees420

                  14 years ago

                  I thought it was Gio instead of Cahill, then after Beane asked for Skaggs, the talks turned to Cahill.  

                  Reply
          • Yankees420

            14 years ago

            I think Johnson was joking.  

            Reply
      • Johnson Doephis

        14 years ago

        “dude proven stud that almost won a Cy Young for some worthless prospects” – My best talk radio impression.

        Reply
      • slamsand

        14 years ago

        Because Cahill is only 1 year older than Parker, and an established MLBer. That’s why.

        Reply
        • FamousGrouse

          14 years ago

          Cahill is 5 months older-not even a full year older. Sorry 9 months older

          Reply
        • JunKim

          14 years ago

          They are same age.

          Reply
    • Satoshi9227

      14 years ago

      I have no idea why.

      Reply
    • slamsand

      14 years ago

      YEP.

      Reply
  22. dc21892

    14 years ago

    Arizona has one hell of a rotation now.

    Reply
  23. Joe Garcia

    14 years ago

    Both of the players are overrated by each team’s fans. AZ fans are taking as reference the 5 2/3 vs LA, and the A’s fans take the 2010 season.

    As a DBack fan, I will miss Parker because we waited 3 seasons to him to debut, and was the AZ farm reference for o couple of years.

    Reply
  24. slamsand

    14 years ago

    I’m not an A’s fan, but I’m disappointed in Beane’s return. My initial reaction was, “wow, they got Parker!” 

    Yea…..but they gave up Cahill doing it. And Breslow is about equivalent to Cook’s potential. So really, it was like a swap of Cahill for Parker and Cowgill, which, if you look at it that way, is a terrible return for the great talent that Cahill is.

    Reply
  25. BrandonDbacks

    14 years ago

    Ryan Cook. lol Thunder Thighs!!

    Reply
  26. BrandonDbacks

    14 years ago

    Ryan Cook. lol Thunder Thighs!!

    Reply
  27. woodmember

    14 years ago

    I’ve watched or listened to every A’s game for the past decade, and I can tell you that Cahill is a fantastic pitcher.  One of the best we’ve had.  I’m sorry to see him go and think that when everything’s settled, the A’s will have come out on the short end of this deal. 

    Reply
    • FamousGrouse

      14 years ago

      He does put Todd Van Poppel to shame.
      All kidding aside the A’s have had some great pitchers throughout the history of the franchise. 

      Reply
  28. woodmember

    14 years ago

    I’ve watched or listened to every A’s game for the past decade, and I can tell you that Cahill is a fantastic pitcher.  One of the best we’ve had.  I’m sorry to see him go and think that when everything’s settled, the A’s will have come out on the short end of this deal. 

    Reply
  29. oaklandfan22

    14 years ago

    question to a Dback fan does cowgill have potential?

    Reply
    • BrandonDbacks

      14 years ago

      yes he does. He has tons of speed and good Defense. I like this trade for both sides, makes sense.

      Reply
    • slamsand

      14 years ago

      Very little. Cowgill profiles as a bench player, but may have the chance to stick around awhile in that role.

      Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Cowgill will be a pleasant addition to the A’s. He’s WAY better than a 4th OF. But the Dbacks have one of the most solid OFs in the game defensively, so he simply was never going to break through.

      Reply
      • qudjy1

        14 years ago

        It was painful to watch Cowgill hit last year.

        Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Cowgill will be a pleasant addition to the A’s. He’s WAY better than a 4th OF. But the Dbacks have one of the most solid OFs in the game defensively, so he simply was never going to break through.

      Reply
  30. oaklandfan22

    14 years ago

    question to a Dback fan does cowgill have potential?

    Reply
  31. philliesfan136

    14 years ago

    Wow.. Kennedy, Cahill, Hudson, then Bauer, Skaggs, and even Corbin coming up soon….

    Reply
  32. philliesfan136

    14 years ago

    Wow.. Kennedy, Cahill, Hudson, then Bauer, Skaggs, and even Corbin coming up soon….

    Reply
  33. TheWoodyD

    14 years ago

    The A’s have a knack for developing pitching, so as long as Parker doesn’t get injured, this trade should benefit the A’s in the long run.

    And even if Cowgill flops, he’s at least one more player to block Carter from ever stepping foot in the outfield again.

    Reply
    • slamsand

      14 years ago

      How will it “benefit the A’s in the long run”? 
      Cahill is only 24. They gave him up for only slightly younger talent, yet unestablished talent.

      Reply
  34. Conebone69

    14 years ago

    Thank god Colin Cowherd was traded

    Anything to get him off ESPN is a win in my book

    Reply
    • slamsand

      14 years ago

      ok?

      Reply
      • genius.gm.on.mlb.the.show

        14 years ago

        you pissed?

        Reply
  35. Conebone69

    14 years ago

    Thank god Colin Cowherd was traded

    Anything to get him off ESPN is a win in my book

    Reply
  36. Doug

    14 years ago

    Wow, the DBacks got rooked on this one. I don’t know if Billy Beane is so smart, or other GM’s are just stupid, but this is going to look really godawful in 2-3 years when Parker’s an ace and Cahill/Breslow are what they are…mediocre! 

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      If Parker becomes an Ace, then he’ll have played up to and a bit beyond his potential. In that case, good for Oakland. Chances are however he will play up to or just below his full potential as most prospects do. In that case, he’s a 2/3 starter, just what Cahill is TODAY. Dbacks paid high to get proven talent.

      Reply
    • slamsand

      14 years ago

      You’ve got it wrong. See my above comments.

      Reply
      • Doug

        14 years ago

        We’ll see, but Cahill is a middle of the road starter and Parker can be much more. DBacks already have a Joe Saunders, now they have two while the A’s have Parker. 

        Reply
    • Rabbitov

      14 years ago

      Cahill’s only 23 and he’s filthy.  You are going to eat those words. 

      Reply
  37. Marky

    14 years ago

    Goddamn it the A’s are sending money to AZ. This deal officially sucks. Cahill should have been moved next year.

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Wow…uhm…and I thought Beane was the cash conscious one. Money coming back makes this deal a win-win for the Dbacks. Even if all three players going to Oakland max out their potential, the Dbacks are a better contender today than they were when they won the NL West and have financial wiggle room to get even better still.

      Wow. Makes me wonder what Beane knows that KT doesn’t. Otherwise Beane got swindeled. (And I’m a Dbacks fan.)

      Reply
    • oaklandfan22

      14 years ago

      ya this does suck i expected a lot more from the dbacks

      Reply
    • FamousGrouse

      14 years ago

      Yep Kevin Towers is that good.

      Reply
  38. sherrilltradedooverexperience

    14 years ago

    I’d be concerned about the mileage on Cahill’s arm as a dbacks fan.

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      The ability to absorb mileage is one of the big selling points. Dbacks needed a 200+IP guy to replace Saunders. If Cahill can’t pitch those kind of innings then this trade got a lot less palatable. As it is, witht he A’s throwing in cash, the Dbacks got a steal.

      Reply
    • Yankees420

      14 years ago

      Why are you concerned about the mileage on the arm of a 23 year old entering his 4th season?  

      Reply
  39. azdsnd

    14 years ago

    I can see how this makes sense either way – like most trades should.

    For Arizona, they saw themselves with four top pitching prospects with front-line potential (Bauer, Skaggs, Archie, Parker) but just two starters in the big-leagues who are long-term fixtures (Kennedy, Hudson).  Any one of the four top pitching prospects has a chance to be better than Cahill, but they’re all riskier than Cahill (sans Bauer, probably, who is going to be an absolute beast).  With so much upside and risk on their hands, it’s totally understandable to want a bit more certainty.  Cahill provides that, with three years of 3.91 ERA work in his career.  He’s at least a sure-fire #3 starter, locked up for a relatively cheap contract, is moving to the NL West (so he should see his peripherals and productivity improve), and is just 23 (so, again, he should see his peripherals and productivity improve).  Even if he doesn’t excel and become a top-of-the-rotation starter, I could see a 3.7-3.8 ERA over 800 innings from him over the next four years, and that has a ton of value.  Less upside that Parker, sure, but less risky.

    For Oakland, their current ballpark limbo state has them pushing off their years of contention yet again.  They’re trying to line themselves up for 2014-2015, and Parker will be cheap and at his prime then.  Cahill would be in the latter years of his current contract and getting fairly expensive, particularly for Oakland’s tastes.  It makes sense to dump him now for someone who lines up well with their peak years, capitalizing on Cahill’s value while it’s arguably at its highest.  You could argue that Oakland could have gotten more for Cahill, but you could also argue that they really like Parker and value him higher than the packages they could have received from other teams.  It’s also no secret that the A’s have been after Cowgill for a while – they wanted him in the Ziegler deal instead of Allen/Norberto.

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      It made way more sense before the A’s threw in cash as well. I think both sides were underwhelmed as fans when it was announced, but I think that was mostly because neither side was getting a whole lot better so much as just different. Money being tossed in by Oakland gives the Dbacks some continued flexibility this off season and makes this a big win for AZ.

      Reply
      • azdsnd

        14 years ago

        I doubt the money is really significant enough to matter.  Might just cover part of Breslow’s salary or something like that.

        I do agree with the “neither side was getting a whole lot better so much as just different” statement.  Really good way of putting it.

        Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      Here’s the thing, when you are contending “probably”s and “upside” doesn’t matter at all, what you need is on field results. The A’s pretty much sold low on Cahill and it has to do with his service time, so they weren’t looking to raid anyone’s cabinet. Parker’s got promise but is a risk, Cahill is definitely no risk, youre going to get 200 innings of either decent to excellent work. No matter what though, AZ won this deal because Beane wasn’t trying to pull anything flash on them. Bauer would have had to be involved here if this was true Beane deal. 

      Reply
      • azdsnd

        14 years ago

        I’m not sure what a “true Beane deal” is supposed to be, but even slightly insinuating that Bauer could have been involved is crazy.  He’s every bit as good as Cahill right now.

        Reply
        • Marky

          14 years ago

          Ok I’m crazy for saying a guy who has never stood on a MLB field is not as good as someone who has 90+ career starts and is under 24. 

          Ohhh kayyyyyyy 

          /backs away slowly

          Reply
    • Carter2Taylor2Cardenas2Weeks

      14 years ago

      you said a lot of good things except the part about “capitalizing on Cahill’s value while it is at its highest”…..Cahill’s value is currently at its lowest….At the end of the 2010 season he was 18-8 with a 2.97 E.R.A….right now, he is coming off a 12-14 season with a 4.16 E.R.A….A’s lost tons of value by not trading him last offseason

      Reply
  40. Myrick

    14 years ago

    Now the A’s need to trade Parker for a top hitting prospect.

    Reply
  41. genius.gm.on.mlb.the.show

    14 years ago

    Is RepOak ok with this trade?

    Reply
  42. Dan Gallagher

    14 years ago

    Billy Beane usually makes great deals when he trades his players, but he clearly lost on this one. He traded a 23 year old cost controlled starter, who has proven he can pitch in the bigs, for a 4th outfielder a pitcher who has yet prove himself and a decent reliever. A lot of people are hating on Cahill, but I think he is a guy that is a #2 work horse on any team, and given his age he could be more. D-Backs win this one big time.

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      I wouldn’t have minded trading Cahill at some point, but this is essentially selling low on him, he had more value after 2010, and will probably have had a better year in 2012. I just wish the A’s got Skaggs instead of Parker, whos a hard thrower whos already had TJ…not good.

      Reply
  43. BrandonDbacks

    14 years ago

    Any projections of what type of numbers we will see from Cahill in AZ next season Oakland fans?

    Reply
    • oaklandfan22

      14 years ago

      14-9 with a 3.10 era

      Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      25-5 with a 1.90 ERA

      Reply
    • Kb

      14 years ago

      18-9 2.55ERA. he is pitching vs the dodgers, giants, padres.. with the rockies being the only good hitting team. also he is going from AL to NL

      Reply
      • Patricio

        14 years ago

        Yeah because Haren was just awesome going from Oakland to AZ.  Look at such bums like Blanton and Zito once they left to go the NL.  The AL West has the worst offense in baseball.  Outside of Texas, the AL West had zero offense last year. 

        Reply
    • Kb

      14 years ago

      18-9 2.55ERA. he is pitching vs the dodgers, giants, padres.. with the rockies being the only good hitting team. also he is going from AL to NL

      Reply
    • baycommuter

      14 years ago

      16-11 3.82 ERA 4.15 FIP

      Reply
  44. Jay

    14 years ago

    The D Backs with a steal of a trade

    Reply
    • Rabbitov

      14 years ago

      Took the words out of my mouth, just wow. 

      Reply
    • HateTheCoupons

      14 years ago

      When will we get a steal 🙁

      Reply
    • Patricio

      14 years ago

      I wouldn’t expect a Mets fan to understand that it was quite the opposite.

      Reply
  45. Bob M.

    14 years ago

    The only player being more overrated here than Cahill is Parker.

    Reply
    • NYPOTENCE

      14 years ago

      I don’t think anyone is overrating Cahill. The A’s got what a middle of the rotation starter should be able to haul in.

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        Its funny that Cahill was actually rated as a better prospect than Parker, for the short time he was in the minors. I still cant believe he only had 6 starts at AA before being promoted. 

        Reply
  46. Marky

    14 years ago

    I guess all isn’t lost if the A’s are throwing this rotation out there in the second half of 2012: Anderson-McCarthy-Braden-Parker-Gray. That has potential, I can’t see them losing 100 games with that, especially if they end up with LoMo or a decent hitter who doesn’t have much service time for Gio and Bailey.

    Odds of that happening though: 25-1.

    Reply
  47. Edgar4evar

    14 years ago

    I think both teams filled needs based on where they are right now. The D’Backs get an upgrade at SP without losing any players expected to contribute a lot right away. The A’s get future value that is probably greater than the present value of the players traded. I don’t know anything about Cowgill other than his stats, but he’s run a high OBP throughout the minors which is a good sign, to me, that he has good plate discipline and pitch recognition. He’s a base stealer, not a home run hitter. If he can play D, then he’s a potential starter. Parker looks like a good prospect on paper assuming his recovery from Tommy John continues to go well.

    Good deal for both teams, but I think the A’s came out a bit ahead. Cahill’s peripherals are not impressive. He looks to me like a middle rotation guy on a good team.

    Reply
  48. Edgar4evar

    14 years ago

    I think both teams filled needs based on where they are right now. The D’Backs get an upgrade at SP without losing any players expected to contribute a lot right away. The A’s get future value that is probably greater than the present value of the players traded. I don’t know anything about Cowgill other than his stats, but he’s run a high OBP throughout the minors which is a good sign, to me, that he has good plate discipline and pitch recognition. He’s a base stealer, not a home run hitter. If he can play D, then he’s a potential starter. Parker looks like a good prospect on paper assuming his recovery from Tommy John continues to go well.

    Good deal for both teams, but I think the A’s came out a bit ahead. Cahill’s peripherals are not impressive. He looks to me like a middle rotation guy on a good team.

    Reply
  49. Diablo 2

    14 years ago

    What the heck..Are the A’s just ?? what is A’s plan? They should have got Skaggs for both of these guys?? What are they trying to do?

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Skaggs, a #1 LHP prospect that will likely see big league time next season and has loads of years left under team control for Cahill? Not a chance. Cahill is already on a big league contract and has #2 stuff on a good day and is usually a #3. Trades are supposed to be about being somewhat equal. In this deal, they pretty much are.

      Reply
      • Diablo 2

        14 years ago

        Skaggs is a number 1 PROSPECT..And Cahill already has a BIG LEAGUE CONTRACT..Exactly why Skaggs should have been moved instead..But w/e this argument is pointless since it happened already..it is what it is

        Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        You don’t think Parker will see big league time next year too? Even in AZ? He did last year and probably will in 2012.

        Reply
  50. Hordak Sanchez

    14 years ago

    gotta love Beane and his man crushes (Cowgill).  Maybe he can bring Erubiel Durazo back.  Yay!

    Reply
    • Chioakcisco

      14 years ago

      At this point, Ruby has more power than half the people in the A’s lineup.

      Reply
  51. Abraham Berrio

    14 years ago

    Some of you saying that too many prospects were given up and the DBacks ‘lost’ the trade, well, you’re missing something on the word prospect. PROSPECT = POTENTIAL = RAW = MINOR LEAGUE = PROSPECT = PROSPECT = PROSPECT, not major league ready material.

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      Except that Parker and Cowgill are not prospects. They are in fact major league ready. Cowgill will be your starting CF. Parker will be in your rotation. He would have been in AZ’s rotation last year, but we had no openings and still don’t. Cook is the one piece of raw potential. High ceiling for him is as a stud Closer. Average ceiling for him he winds up a set-up man.

      Neither team really “won” in this deal, but the Dbacks paid a high price for talent that is likely already at its peak.

      Reply
  52. michael hughes

    14 years ago

    Okay, without saying my opinion on the trade I see a BIG problem with the way some people are looking at a certain player. To try and prove a point I’m going to post the career numbers of two pitchers without giving their names.

    Pitcher A – K/9: 5.48 BB/9: 3.35 GB%: 53.3% HR/FB: 12.1%
    Pitcher B – K/9: 5.94 BB/9: 3.91 GB%: 52.6% HR/FB: 10.2%

    And for those who are interested…

    Pitcher A – FIP: 4.51 xFIP: 4.23
    Pitcher B – FIP: 4.39 xFIP: 4.35

    These two pitchers have very similar career lines wouldn’t you say? For the old school people out there, what if I told one recently took a large step forward in ERA and one recently took a large step back? One of these pitchers is being called an ace and one is Charlie Morton. 

    Cahill is pitcher A. Charlie Morton is pitcher B. Cahill has had an average career in the major leagues so far and is showing no signs of improving, he is not an ace. In fact, it could be argued that Charlie Morton would be the better get of the two for the Diamond backs due to Cahill’s ridiculous HR/FB rate that he’s posted despite being in one of most HR suppressing parks in the league. Moving to Chase field from Oakland will see the amount of HRs he gives up SKYROCKET. Some people seem to think that just because he’s a ground ball pitcher he does not also give up a ton of homers but that’s incorrect making him a horrible fit for the Dbacks.

    Reply
    • FamousGrouse

      14 years ago

      Did you factor in Cahill is 24 and Charlie Morton is 28?

      Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      Did you factor in that Cahill had exactly 6 starts at AA before being rushed into the rotation in 2009, hence having crappy numbers for that season that you really shouldn’t be using to make arguments with?

      Reply
  53. michael hughes

    14 years ago

    If you’re still not convinced…

    Cahill – Home ERA 2011: 3.20 Home ERA career: 3.24 Away ERA 2011: 5.23 Away ERA career: 4.71

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      6 starts at AA. 23 years old….if you are trying to make a concrete argument against a pitcher with those factors in his favor, you are never going to make any kind of a valid point. Its really not wise to write off pitchers before they are 30 who have 90 starts in 3 years, and you are doing this to a guy who is under 24….christ.

      Reply
      • michael hughes

        14 years ago

        I’m afraid you don’t understand. I’m not “writing him off” I’m saying that based on the information that we have now from the over 500 major league innings Cahill has pitched there is no reason to believe that he will be successful in AZ. I’m not saying it’s not possible but it’s not likely based on the evidence.

        Also 6 starts at AA is irrelevant as is his age when he debuted.If he shouldn’t be judged based on what he’s actually done, what should he be judged on? If you say his minor league performance then he’s no more a sure thing than Jarrod Parker.

        Also try not to make ad homenim arguments in your posts, it’s annoying and does not work in your favor.  

        Reply
        • FamousGrouse

          14 years ago

          Well you have not chosen a good comparison player. You should choose a player with around 500-600 innings pitched and at age 24. Baseball reference lists Alex Fernandez. 
          Age and future success has been proving critically important more than once.  I don’t consider Charlie Morton a good comparison because of the age difference of 4 years. I think 4 years is a significant enough gap to say this is a bad comp. A player within 1-2 years of age would have been much better.

          If Charlie Morton was 24 or 25 now and that data was for his age 20-24 season I would consider that a much better comparison. However, 4 years difference (in a sport where 12 years is a long career) weakens your argument. 

          Reply
          • michael hughes

            14 years ago

            I understand your point but I’m not comparing their value or saying that I think they’ll produce the same results from this point forward. 
            My Morton comparison is a response to the people saying that Cahill is a prove MLB talent or a proven ace. I used Charlie Morton to demonstrate that so far in his career he has not demonstrated that he is a great pitcher and that his career numbers are almost identical to a player most would not consider to have demonstrated that he is an ace. 

            Reply
        • Marky

          14 years ago

          Its more annoying when people judge numbers at absolute face value and don’t take in the context in which they occurred. I really have no idea what you are even on about, first you say “Im not writing him off” then you say “based on my cherrypicked raw data with no other thought put into it, there is no reason to believe he will be successful in AZ”. 

          It absolutely is likely Cahill will be a beast in AZ, even with his past numbers. He’s so young and you dont care about that, thats infuriating to have to read. 

          His big league numbers have been good but always getting better, I’m an A’s fan and have watched tons of his starts, he’s a great groundball pitcher right now, maybe the best one in baseball. 

          Im just going to stop after this because its clear you don’t understand how players develop in the bigs and are essentially trolling at this point. Bye.

          Reply
          • michael hughes

            14 years ago

            I’m sorry to have offended you by trying to reasonably discuss a players true talent even if I don’t understand how that is possible. You are entitled to your opinion just as I’m entitled to mine all this emotion is unnecessary. Though, I’m a little disappointed by the level of discourse that is obviously the standard of the internet. But what do I know, obviously I’m just “trolling”. 

            Reply
  54. baycommuter

    14 years ago

    Look what the A’s are doing. Every move, every word, says “We’re trading everything and  won’t try to contend until we get to San Jose. We don’t care if we draw less people in Oakland than the old Montreal Expos.” Twenty-eight other teams and 90 percent of the agents know this now, they say it on MLB Network, even casual fans of Eastern teams say it. They’ve burned all bridges with Oakland. They’ve built up a sense of inevitability to get the votes to crush the Giants’opposition to them moving to San Jose. Hell, they’re even giving pieces to the team the Giants has to fear the most.

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      14 years ago

      The A’s may not have gotten better with tonight’s deal, but they certainly got deeper. Instead of a #3 RHP already on a big league contract, they got a starting OFer and a high ceiling starter that will be in next year’s rotation that still has years of low salary time ahead of him. They certainly haven’t really gotten any worse. The biggest thing they MIGHT be losing is innings. Cahill has pitched quite a few the last 2 years.

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        That’s true but Cahill is more valuable than the package he was moved for and really needed to bring in another quality prospect, considering AZ has like 40 of those, Beane failed here. 

        Reply
        • J.j. Miller

          14 years ago

          i dont disagree they shouldve got an additional prospect but i dont think it was a failure either

          Reply
  55. melonis_rex

    14 years ago

    Dislike. Hardcore dislike. Not cool. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TRADE YOUR PIECES JUST BECAUSE A DIVISION RIVAL GOT BETTER. 

    Reply
  56. GoBigD

    14 years ago

    If Cahill can return to 2010 form, this is a steal by AZ. Jarrod Parker hasn’t proved anything yet. Yes, his potential “high” is front of the line ace, but realistic expectations put him at a solid 2 or very good 3.

    Reply
    • J.j. Miller

      14 years ago

      his 2010 was result of the lowest BABIP in baseball

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        Yes because he had a phenomenal INF defense behind him, and is a groundball pitcher. He was also 22 which is a great result.

        Reply
  57. Marky

    14 years ago

    If this has anything to do with screwing over the Giants because of their blocking San Jose, than this doesn’t have anything to do with the A’s getting younger, cheaper or deeper. The story that AZ asked for Gio+Cahill but balked at including Skaggs and Parker really shows that what Beane is trying to do is to strengthen the Giants #1 competitor. 

    The plot be thickening….

    Reply
    • J.j. Miller

      14 years ago

      doubt it. its more about probably dumping cahill’s contract which they jumped the gun on. he’s solid but not that great. They get a pitcher who might have as much upside + an OF who theyve liked for awhile. Add in the revenues of rangers/angels is so high and oakland is basically sending a message to selig/mlb they need a new stadium resolution soon. Though towers and beane are good friend i wouldnt doubt an FU to the giants might be somewhat part of it. Plus maybe more freed up $$ to put a bid on darvish, who knows.

      Reply
      • Marky

        14 years ago

        Again, the negativity on Cahill here is entirely unsubstantiated because everyone adds in his rookie season numbers where he was supposed to be at AAA anyway. Cahill was the 11th best prospect in baseball prior to the 09 season, has an all-star appearance and has had some remarkably dominant stretches for a guy who isnt 24 yet. 

        Its like, how can anyone see Cahill’s excellent slider and obscene groundball rates, then add in the worst A’s INF defense seen in years and equate it with Cahill stinking in 2011? Its hurting my brain how short sighted people are in underrating Cahill, I’d honestly rather have him right now than Ian Kennedy, because he’s 23 and already done so much and improved every year in one aspect of his game. 

        Reply
        • J.j. Miller

          14 years ago

          gio, mccarthy, moscoso managed to have nice seasons with that terrible defense. A’s problem isnt pitching, they’ll be fine with or without cahill in that area. Hopefully health pending braden/anderson will be back. Outman another yr off tj surgery. They seem to love Ross, but we’ll see. Plus they’ll have parker/gray who IMO can be those next great starters for A’s. Plus i’m sure if they make more trade they’ll add another starter or two that way. IMO it wasnt a rip off trade or a terrible one. I will expect them to go after impaxct hitting prospects in gio/bailey trades

          Reply
  58. northsfbay

    14 years ago

    The A’s aren’t screwing Giants with the trade, they are screwing the few A’s that are left, with losing teams for the next 5 years.

    Reply
    • Marky

      14 years ago

      Did you think the A’s were going to beat the Angels and Rangers over the next 5 years? Really?

      Reply
  59. ObamaDinoKiller

    14 years ago

    Wow surprise surprise, Oakland trades another good player for prospects. I am so sick of everyone calling Billy Beane a genius when all he does is trade good players TO SAVE MONEY. HOW CAN YOU WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP W/ALL YOUNG PLAYERS? you need the vets to guide the young guys and keep them in line. All this team does is trade talent for prospects, never make the playoffs (or they don’t go far) and the guy gets a gddam movie made about him with Brad Pitt? WTF? And he wanted to trade GIO??? I am so glad I’m not a dumb Oakland fan because I’m not into the whole mediocre thing. G-d, I wish other people would see what I do and that is a GM who refuses to build a winner.

    Reply
  60. Wilsonl

    14 years ago

    Parker is number 25 on the top 100 prospects of 2011.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Notes: Scherzer, Varsho, Francis

    Pirates Reportedly Receiving Interest In Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    Angels Sign Ben Gamel To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version