Headlines

  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On Jon Lester

By charliewilmoth | July 27, 2014 at 5:48pm CDT

Here’s the latest on Jon Lester and the Red Sox:

  • Lester says he would not be inclined to consider a contract extension if a team traded for him, WEEI.com’s Alex Speier writes. “[M]y ultimate goal would be to come back here. That would be, like I said the other day, I know that’s hard to do,” Lester says. “Money doesn’t buy you happiness.” Speier notes that if Lester would be willing to agree to a deal with his new team as a condition of a trade, that might be a way for the Red Sox to get additional value from the deal.
  • Speier also writes that there has been “no meaningful dialogue” on a possible trade of Lester to the Dodgers.
  • The Red Sox want a “huge” return if they’re going to trade Lester, Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports tweets.
  • The Dodgers have a good group of outfielders with which to do a Lester trade, including Joc Pederson and Matt Kemp, Jon Heyman of CBS Sports writes. (A recent report from Gordon Edes of ESPN Boston indicated the Dodgers and Red Sox were considering a Lester/Kemp deal.)
  • Any Lester/Kemp trade would need to include other pieces and/or money, Rosenthal tweets. He quotes another team’s GM who says, “He doesn’t add much value to any deal for us even at half his salary.” Kemp is owed $107MM from 2015 through 2019. Rosenthal also adds that trading Pederson for Lester would not make sense for the Dodgers unless they received other young talent in return.
Share 9 Retweet 22 Send via email13

Boston Red Sox Los Angeles Dodgers Newsstand Joc Pederson Jon Lester Matt Kemp

Alex Rios Drawing Interest From At Least Four Teams
Main
Latest On Yankees’ Pursuit Of Starting Pitching
View Comments (66)
Post a Comment

66 Comments

  1. Bob Shute

    11 years ago

    Lester for Joc Pederson … ok
    Lester for Kemp … get real

    Reply
    • Antonio Alexsander langston

      11 years ago

      The reciprocate point of view seems to be true on the other side of the fence as well.

      Reply
    • theophilus166

      11 years ago

      You think a team is going to give up a lot to rent a guy who says he hopes to resign with Boston in the offseason? Boston has nothing to lose in trading Lester, even if it’s for a single C-level prospect.

      Reply
      • Stonehands

        11 years ago

        Except when a team offers $30+mil more than than the sox do through free agency and we would be out decent prospects and out of Lester

        Reply
      • EarlyMorningBoxscore

        11 years ago

        A team might if it means winning a world series.

        Reply
  2. Stonehands

    11 years ago

    The Sox will not get a “monster haul” but they should be able to pry a couple top 100 prospects out of it. In the Dodgers case, a prospect haul of Pederson, Anderson and Reed would be appealing enough, the only trouble would be getting the Dodgers to budge on Pederson

    Reply
    • Darmintak 2

      11 years ago

      The problem is, a three month rental isn’t usually worth a team’s top prospect, at least to the team who’s looking for a rental.

      Reply
      • MaineBaseball

        11 years ago

        Doesn’t mean that teams don’t do it every trade deadline.

        Reply
      • $1534453

        11 years ago

        Contenders risk the future for the sake of the present all the time… LaPorta, et al for Sabathia… Wallace, et al for Holliday… Smoak, et al for Lee… Wheeler for Beltran… Segura, et al for Greinke… Texas gave up a lot for Garza…

        And Lester is about as valuable as a 2-month rental ever gets.

        Reply
        • bryce1344

          11 years ago

          Cards knew they had a very good shot of signing Holiday is the reason they made the deal with Wallace, plus they had an inkling that Wallace would be a bust.
          I don’t understand why Lester would want to stay with Boston after the low ball offer. That offer indicates one of 2 things, that the team doesn’t think much of you and wants you gone or they are trying to take advantage of your loyalty by grossly under paying you.

          Reply
          • Guest 3683

            11 years ago

            I think they’ve just paid attention to how the Johan, Zito and Zambrano deals went, and how the Sabathia, Tanaka and Cain deals are currently going (Verlander and Lee’s contracts don’t look great at the moment either). Teams that sign/extend pitchers for $18MM+ AAV rarely get more than 2 or 3 really good years out of them. I don’t fault them for being reluctant to offer a mega-deal.

            Reply
            • Stonehands

              11 years ago

              How are those comparable? The original CC deal went as planned, though the extension was stupid. The Lee deal has gone about as well as could be hoped, He got hurt and there is still optimism for him to return to form. And Felix is in the beginning of his deal, all 3 of these deals looked great at the start of the deals

              Reply
              • Guest 3682

                11 years ago

                The Sabathia extension (5/$122MM) and Lee signing (5/$120MM) are probably right in line with what Lester is wanting. I’m not sure a more comparable deal exists.

                I agree 100% that deals should only be judged by how they looked at the start. But I always thought those deals were too risky from day one. The Lee contract has worked out better than Sabathia’s extension, but it’s still a contract the Phillies would be well-served to unload, and it’s hard to imagine them doing so without eating a lot of it.

                The Felix extension made sense, in my opinion, since it began with his age 27 season. But whoever pays Lester will get him at age 31, and on. I’m not sure I’d risk any more than 5/$100MM.

                Reply
                • Stonehands

                  11 years ago

                  That may be true, but these huge deals for pitchers are signed with the expectation of 2-3 ace like years, and then the decline, Lee was an ace up until this year and Sabathia up until the last, so if Lester signs for say, 5/120 and we get 2 ace seasons and a manageable decline, then I would say it would be worth-while

                  Reply
          • ed27

            11 years ago

            Boston is very reluctant to go long on pitchers getting older and they fear that is what they probably will have to do to retain Lester, even with his “loyalty” to the Sox. That loyalty will be sorely tested if teams offer 6 years and Boston offers 4 or 5 with less money per year. Cherrington is probably correct in his assessment but teams almost have to factor in 2 sub-par years at the end of a contract in order to get several excellent ones on the front end when a Free Agent of substance reaches 30.

            Reply
      • dodgerz88

        11 years ago

        You are right unless your talking about the Angels. They did for Greinke only to miss the playoffs and have us sign him.

        Reply
      • oswald

        11 years ago

        The Dodgers need to win the World Series to justify all the money they have spent. Lester is the type of guy who could push them over the top and make them a force in the playoffs. A playoff rotation of Kershaw-Lester-Greinke-Ryu is about as formidable as it gets. They’re in win now mode, so they have to be willing to part with some of their prospects.

        Reply
      • Eric Foley

        11 years ago

        Would you trade a WS ring for a prospect? Even a top prospect has no guarantees. Lester is a Proven champion! I’d hate to see him go.

        Reply
      • Stonehands

        11 years ago

        I agree that the Dodger’s don’t want to do it, but I think that might be the price of Lester if the Sox shop him around. Off the top of my head, LA, PIT, STL, SEA, TOR, BAL, and maybe even KC or CLE could in interested if they all see themselves as contenders. Not saying all of them will pay the prospect price, but with that many teams involved, somebody would overpay

        Reply
    • tommyl

      11 years ago

      I think the Dodgers would do Pederson for Lester if they think Kemp is salvageable. Obviously, they’d rather move Kemp, but Lester offers such a huge boost, they could move Pederson and keep going with their four-headed outfield. Can you imagine Kershaw/Lester/Grienke/Ryu as your playoff rotation?

      Reply
      • Stonehands

        11 years ago

        It would be ridiculous, agreed. But LA seems determined to keep Pederson

        Reply
      • Ricky Martin 2

        11 years ago

        Would be close to impossible to beat that team. Could even use those guys out of the pen in in a bind to secure an inning or 2 in the WS. As close to an automatic win as you could bet

        Reply
  3. MeowMeow

    11 years ago

    Jon, I appreciate the sentiment but can you not kill your trade value with this talk please?

    Reply
  4. Antonio Alexsander langston

    11 years ago

    Lackey for Kemp?…everybody loves them some John Lackey.

    Reply
    • d-blaqueqq

      11 years ago

      and at a nice discount of $500,000 next year, haha.

      Reply
      • frogbogg

        11 years ago

        That’s a salary the Marlins love.

        Reply
  5. frogbogg

    11 years ago

    Pederson was just below Swihart and Henry Owens in Baseball America’s midseason top 50 prospects.

    Reply
    • Cdiaz

      11 years ago

      Not every prospect has to be in the top 10 to have alot of value . Actually mostly every team would want joc

      Reply
  6. SoxFanCyp

    11 years ago

    Seager and Pederson for Lester?

    Reply
    • Antonio Alexsander langston

      11 years ago

      LA is having a hard time letting go of one of them…we’re certainly not getting both.

      Reply
    • theophilus166

      11 years ago

      Why don’t the Dodgers throw in Puig and Kershaw while you’re at it?

      Reply
    • Cdiaz

      11 years ago

      I heard buster say something about that he’s outta his mind lol hes no kershaw

      Reply
      • EarlyMorningBoxscore

        11 years ago

        While I agree, Lester is no Kershaw, and I don’t believe the Sox get Pederson/Seager. However, if a team was looking to trade for Kershaw it would take a lot more than the equivalent of Seager/Pederson. So saying Lester is no Kershaw is kind of silly in this case.

        Reply
        • Cdiaz

          11 years ago

          Well thats how much they want for him if he was a kershaw

          Reply
          • EarlyMorningBoxscore

            11 years ago

            No, no it’s not. If Lester was equal to Kershaw it would cost a lot more than Pederson and Seager.

            Reply
            • Cdiaz

              11 years ago

              There still asking too much for lester seager and perderson you can get price with those prospects and some lower prospects aswell.

              Reply
  7. NRD1138 2

    11 years ago

    If Lester was really that caring about the Red Sox he would stop trying to sabotage them moving him by saying he would love to sign back with them. They will get far less for him if it is a .5 year rental vs chance to sign him to a long term deal.
    EDIT: nevermind, I think most teams will only trade as if he was not likely going to stay with the team that traded for him.

    Reply
    • d-blaqueqq

      11 years ago

      Well, his value couldn’t be any higher. I don’t agree either, but I’m sure if the Dodgers pass someone else will bite.

      Reply
  8. هذا الرجل رهيبة الكبير خليل

    11 years ago

    Lesters good but if they want a “huge return” for a rental, then you might as well not even shop him

    Reply
    • Antonio Alexsander langston

      11 years ago

      No harm in shopping him and not making a deal if it comes to it. The Sox should feel obligated to at least try and get what they think he’s worth.

      Reply
  9. Cdiaz

    11 years ago

    Why are they asking for so much for lester he aint no david price . Yes people he’s won a few world series berly last year in the postseason he made a name for him , prior to that fans in boston wanted to get rid of him

    Reply
    • Stonehands

      11 years ago

      I never remember wanting to get rid of Lester, I remember of wanting to get rid of Beckett and Lackey

      Reply
      • Cdiaz

        11 years ago

        I remember people complaining alot about him , that he wasn’t consistant he has a high era ect.

        Reply
        • Stonehands

          11 years ago

          People were upset by his performance over a season and a month, but i don’t recall many people wanting to trade him

          Reply
        • d-blaqueqq

          11 years ago

          Other than the chicken and beer year, he’s been pretty good.

          Reply
          • Cdiaz

            11 years ago

            Lol but if were go to l.a he might a number #3 guy we have kershaw & greinke

            Reply
            • d-blaqueqq

              11 years ago

              And still no ring to show for it. Adding Lester won’t guarantee a WS, but Dodgers would have a great chance in the playoffs. Especially the five game LDS.

              Reply
              • Cdiaz

                11 years ago

                Thats a great point , but you can’t lose your whole farm system for a rental

                Reply
                • d-blaqueqq

                  11 years ago

                  You’re right it seems foolish, but it’s a risk the GM has to take if he feels that it benefits the team (If they can get Shields or Price, good for them) It’s hard to let go of prospects, ask any Boston fan lol.

                  Reply
    • M.Kit

      11 years ago

      He has more postseason consistency than Price. And this year, you could make the case he’s been better than Lester (minus the extra year of control)

      Reply
    • M.Kit

      11 years ago

      He has more postseason consistency than Price. And this year, you could make the case he’s been better than Lester (minus the extra year of control)

      Reply
  10. ed27

    11 years ago

    Lester is a true ace but to acquire him at a steep price and then lose him in the off-season is foolish. Better to wait and see what develops in the off-season and see if Boston is interested in coming close to what others will eventually offer. Lester will take a hometown discount–the question is how much?

    Reply
    • Cdiaz

      11 years ago

      Maybe shields could a lil cheaper for the dodgers a three team deal mariners dodgers & royals – mariners want kemp dodgers need few more prospects

      Reply
    • jed_hoyer

      11 years ago

      sounds more like his only choice no matter what offers he gets from others

      Reply
  11. Antonio Alexsander langston

    11 years ago

    If the Sox trade Lester, then I certainly hope they automatically pony up the sixth year for him in the off season. He’s been such a trooper through this whole thing. (plus losing him to FA would suuuck).

    Reply
  12. nightmarerec0n

    11 years ago

    Three way Trade:

    *Trade Lester to contender for a top 50 prospect.
    *Trade Mookie Betts, Barnes, and another prospects to Colorado for Carlos Gonzalez

    Worth noting Carlos Gonzalez didn’t make Dave Cameron’s top 50 trade value list. His salary escalates from $10.5M to $17M next year. CarGo won’t be around for Colorado window of contention most likely.

    Reply
    • Stonehands

      11 years ago

      Why trade for Cargo? The Rockies appear unwilling to sell meaning you would need to drastically overpay

      Reply
      • nightmarerec0n

        11 years ago

        My understanding is that they really don’t want to trade Tulo, but CarGo is a more open possibility. The Rockies aren’t contending and he’ll be earning $20M hen they are.

        Reply
    • Antonio Alexsander langston

      11 years ago

      I wouldn’t give up Betts. We have plenty of pitching prospects to get a deal done for offense.

      Reply
      • nightmarerec0n

        11 years ago

        I would. He is blocked at 2nd and realistically only has value in CF. I’d rather sell high on him and convince someone else he is better than he is. Plus Colorado could use a 2B

        Reply
  13. Mikenmn

    11 years ago

    There’s almost no reasonable deal to be made here. Trading for Lester you get a very good pitcher for two months (and post season) and a guy who pines to return to the team who traded him. Just how much do you want to give up? And trading Lester when you know you can QO him and get a pick, or possibly even sign him, has its own issues. If the Red Sox get prime prospects for a two month rental more power to them. If, after that, he actually re-signs with them, I wonder what impact that might have on this type of trade next year.

    Reply
  14. Bertin Lefkovic

    11 years ago

    If the Dodgers were given a 72hr negotiating window with Lester, would Pederson be enough to get him? Seems fair to me.

    Reply
    • Antonio Alexsander langston

      11 years ago

      that would be a deal breaker for Boston, IMO. Even if we trade him we still have a very real chance of picking him back up in free agency. Sox won’t put that opportunity in jeopardy,

      Reply
    • snackadj

      11 years ago

      As a Dodger fan, I’m not sure that would be enough. A guaranteed contract, absolutely. A window? I’m not sure I like that.

      Reply
  15. tom5467

    11 years ago

    If Lester is that open about returning to Boston as a FA, I wouldn’t deal for him. Why waste the prospects

    Reply
    • Stonehands

      11 years ago

      To put your team over the top to get a ring

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    The Astros Are (Again) Not Getting Much From A Pricey First Base Signing

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    Royals Outright Thomas Hatch

    Diamondbacks Place Kendall Graveman On 15-Day IL

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Guardians’ Will Brennan, Andrew Walters Undergo Season-Ending Surgeries

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Nats Notes: Nuñez, Chapparo, Williams

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version