Headlines

  • Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear
  • Astros Promote Brice Matthews
  • Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow
  • Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers
  • Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help
  • Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Indians Listening On Starters; Discussed Carrasco With Blue Jays

By Jeff Todd | July 23, 2015 at 1:36pm CDT

The Indians may be more willing to listen to trade scenarios regarding their controllable pitching than they have indicated publicly, according to a report from Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports (Twitter links). In particular, they’ve spoken with the Blue Jays regarding righty Carlos Carrasco.

There are other appealing arms under long-term control in Cleveland — Corey Kluber, Danny Salazar, and Trevor Bauer most notable among them. But the report indicates that the Indians are most willing to consider a deal involving Carrasco. The 28-year-old carries only a 3.94 ERA this season after last year’s breakout, but his peripherals (10.1 K/9, 1.9 BB/9, 49.0% groundball rate) suggest he’s rather an elite performer. And ERA estimators all value his work this season at a sub-3.00 level.

Expanding Carrasco’s value is the fact that he’s only just started playing under a four-year, $22MM extension inked over the winter. That deal includes two option years (both of which include escalators) that could boost its total value to $48MM. Even at that price, though, it looks to be quite a bargain. And the flexibility at the back end limits the already-reasonable risk.

With the Tigers still debating whether to market David Price and the White Sox still waiting to decide on Jeff Samardzija, the AL Central suddenly seems to hold the key to the starting pitching market. It remains to be seen whether some or all of those players will seriously be marketed, though at least Samardzija seems a good bet to change hands.

Carrasco, though, would be a much more palatable target for Toronto since he comes with plenty of affordable future control. As Passan notes in his report, the Jays have a number of notable young talents that would certainly hold appeal to Cleveland — he mentions Jeff Hoffman, Daniel Norris, Dalton Pompey, and Anthony Alford — and it would be much easier to part with one or more for a non-rental.

On today’s MLBTR podcast, Steve Adams and I discussed the possibility of Cleveland moving an asset such as Carrasco — possibly as a means of offloading some of the big salaries owed to players like Nick Swisher and Michael Bourn. It’s unclear what kind of deal might conceivably be structured between the two clubs, but it’s notable (as Steve and I also covered) that Toronto has significantly more open payroll capacity in the future than they do at present. Taking on some later-in-time money could in theory offer a route to acquiring a controllable arm while limiting the damage to the club’s talent pipeline.

Share 46 Retweet 66 Send via email0

Cleveland Guardians Newsstand Toronto Blue Jays Carlos Carrasco

Podcast: American League Overview
Main
Astros Acquire Scott Kazmir
View Comments (42)
Post a Comment

42 Comments

  1. joshbresser

    10 years ago

    More SPs on the market. Awesome. Keep doing nothing though, Walt, I’m sure someone will give you that magical super mega prospect package you’re waiting for. Embarrassing.

    Reply
    • scissormetimbers

      10 years ago

      Relax its only 8 more days, patience my friend!

      Reply
    • stymeedone

      10 years ago

      Yeah, look at the exciting players Beane just got by trading the first starter. Household names both! When Walt does make his trade, you won’t know the players he gets, either, so you will probably complain that he got too little.

      Reply
  2. scann

    10 years ago

    As I mentioned they should do in the last Indians thread……..

    Reply
  3. User 4245925809

    10 years ago

    Carrasco, if available would cost a mint. The guy is cost controlled through 2020 with those 2 reasonable 9m team options. EVERY team in the league would be in a bidding war if it’s actually true the Tribe is shopping him and the Jays don’t have the farm system to win that war.

    I really, really doubt they have him on the market, it would be too good to be true for rich farm systems.. Like Houston, The cubs and Boston.

    Reply
    • raef715

      10 years ago

      if i were the phillies, id take on every contract the Indians want to dump in order to get Carrasco.

      Reply
  4. scann

    10 years ago

    Don’t stop their Indians……shop……..Moss,Brantley,Bourne,Kipnis,Santana,Murphy,Gomes,Kluber,Salazar,Bauer,Swisher,Aviles,Raburn…….

    Reply
    • J32

      10 years ago

      You missed a couple names
      indians.mlb.com/team/roster_active.jsp?c_id=cle

      Reply
    • Yogajonny

      10 years ago

      Haha hahaha. Always good for a laugh. FU NYY!

      Reply
    • stymeedone

      10 years ago

      NOOOOOO! Not Raburn!

      Reply
  5. NoRegretzkys

    10 years ago

    It’s AA’s style. Doesn’t hurt to ask about these kind of pitchers that haven’t really been “on the market.” Same kind of thing he did when he stole Donaldson from the A’s, no other GMs even knew he was available.

    Reply
    • Yogajonny

      10 years ago

      Absolutely. It doesn’t hurt to ask. Everyone is available at a certain cost. Except Stroman. I still think AA should get a crazy offer together for Gray, Clippard and Reddick.

      Reply
      • NoRegretzkys

        10 years ago

        And we all know that AA has a good relationship with Beane. I wouldn’t be surprised honestly, and I agree with keeping Stroman. If Gray, Clippard and Reddick would be packaged to Toronto…the cost would be super high. Like really super high. In a deal like that though, I’d be okay with having Hoffman, Pentecost & Norris being the centrepieces going to Oakland.

        Reply
        • scissormetimbers

          10 years ago

          Id be fine moving all those guys for just Gray, but to get just him I bet you have to add in sanchez

          Reply
          • Yogajonny

            10 years ago

            Norris + pompey + Castro + Pentecost + Cola for the dream A’s pkg I previously mentioned.

            Reply
        • Yogajonny

          10 years ago

          Word big bird. The only way I’m OK with losing Hoffman is if it nets us Sonny G. Big fan. As far as Norris goes, I’d love to keep him but would rather lose him than the Hoff.

          Reply
          • NoRegretzkys

            10 years ago

            I’d rather have the ace that exists than the potential ace that Hoffman might someday turn out to be. Hoffman has already had one TJ surgery, one more and his value will plummet.

            Reply
  6. jeffro513

    10 years ago

    Walt better hope we can get some people for cueto I’ve been saying we should of traded him well before the all-star break

    Reply
    • vtadave

      10 years ago

      Safe to say there are plenty of suitors for Cueto.

      Reply
  7. mtbobson21

    10 years ago

    It would be quite the move for Shapiro and company if they can find a way to trade away the Twins SS/OF Danny Santana. I’d keep the pitching and listen to offers for him first if I were GM.

    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      10 years ago

      It would indeed. Even better if Terry Ryan could somehow make those players magically change places as I did.

      (Fixed.)

      Reply
  8. ehking3448

    10 years ago

    By Danny Santana do you mean Danny Salazar?

    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      10 years ago

      Yes, edited. I blame some combination of rumor flurry and constantly talking to Steve Adams about Twins utilitymen.

      Reply
  9. thebigkahoonie

    10 years ago

    It’s Danny Salazar, not Danny Santana. For what it’s worth, if they deal Carrasco, I will retire my Indian fandom unless they rob someone blind for 2-3 hitters including a cornerstone 3B.

    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      10 years ago

      Yes, addressed above.

      Reply
    • J32

      10 years ago

      I think most player for player trades should give a decent haul since the Jays DO have some pretty decent talent in their farm, but if they trade Carlos with Bourn/Swisher and get nothing really worth noting in return, I’d be absolutely miffed. No way they’re spending that money on anyone worthwhile over the offseason.

      Reply
  10. tigerfan1968

    10 years ago

    no way do the Jays want anything to do with Bourne or Swisher. That would be a non starter.

    Reply
    • NoRegretzkys

      10 years ago

      Why not? Bourne would be an improvement in the OF for the Jays.

      Reply
      • vtadave

        10 years ago

        Not sure those guys are upgrades over Colabello and Pillar.

        Reply
        • NoRegretzkys

          10 years ago

          Colabello is terrible in LF. He was also pretty bad at 1B yesterday. I don’t know the advanced stats for him, but he is just a terrible defender. The Jays even put Carerra in as a defensive replacement for him yesterday.

          Plus, Bourn is a left handed hitter, I’d imagine his production would go up hitting in between Donaldson/Bautista/Encarnacion.

          Reply
        • chris to.

          10 years ago

          They are both defensively better than Colabello. Offensively, they tend to have better track records than Colabello does.Even then, the Jays offense is not exactly a weak spot right now.

          Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      10 years ago

      Of course — point would be to take on salary to reduce prospect value you’d need to get Carrasco.

      Reply
      • chris to.

        10 years ago

        I would have to agree. Pillar is probably better than both Swisher and Bourn defensively. All 3 are better defensively than Colabello. If it means giving up less in the way of prospects, it would be a smart risk for AA to take.

        It fills two holes at once, and involves less of a cost in prospects in theory. My only real concern with your theory is if the Jays are willing (and able) to take on the extra salary they would need to in order to make it work. From what has been posted on this site and elsewhere before, the Jays have somewhere between $4 – $8 million left to spend, which means the Jays would need to shed salary from somewhere.

        Would that require moving Dickey or Reyes to facilitate a trade?

        Reply
        • NoRegretzkys

          10 years ago

          Don’t forget, AA had 8 million to work with that he was planning to use at this time of year. The season is over half over, meaning that less than half of this years salary has to be paid. Next year, Dickey/Buehrle/Romero are no longer paid by Toronto, giving them 40 million more to work with next year.

          Reply
      • chris to.

        10 years ago

        I doubt AA has approval to add more salary than the $4-8 million that is being speculated. So we move Dickey and Reyes (and obviously some prospects) to make room for a high priced outfielder? I would assume Buehrle is going nowhere.

        Thinking about it more, that would make the team look like this:
        C: Martin 1B: Smoak/Colabello 2B: Travis SS: Goins 3B: Donaldson OF: Bourn or Swisher, Pillar, Bautista DH: Encarnacion

        Carrasco, Buehrle, Hutchison, Estrada, Sanchez/Norris/someone else (in no particular order)

        Reply
        • User 4245925809

          10 years ago

          Think if had choice of taking on just ONE of those awful contractual players? Would take Bourne, him could stick on the bench as a 4th/5th OF type, even though he and probably Boras still believe he’s a starting CF and would gripe next year about his 2017 option not triggering but you know? That’s what happens when you sign a LT contract and sit on your rear end the 1st 3 years and don’t produce.

          Swisher is finished, another Allen Craig that would just clog up a roster spot IF the Jays could manage a deal. Borne at least could probably learn to play all 3 OF spots, more use like that.

          Reply
        • NoRegretzkys

          10 years ago

          Carrasco is owed like 1 million for the rest of the year. Bourn is owed around 6 million for the rest of the year. Falls under the 8 million AA has to work with.

          Reply
  11. scissormetimbers

    10 years ago

    If that’s all Kashmir cost, shouldn’t samrzadja cost about the same or pretty close?

    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      10 years ago

      I’d think they are quite close in value. Similar salary. Kazmir has been better, but the injury concerns balance that out.

      Reply
  12. Draven Moss

    10 years ago

    If Carrasco is truly available (still waiting for the next rumour to say that isn’t the case), then the Red Sox should be all over him. He is exactly what they need.

    Reply
    • stymeedone

      10 years ago

      Yes, because the Indians always get great players back from the Red Sox! NOT!

      Reply
      • Draven Moss

        10 years ago

        What does that have to do with anything? If the Indians want a particular player in a deal and that player doesn’t work out, then that is their own problem and they deserve 100% of the blame. That means their own evaluations were flawed. The past isn’t gonna stop any team from making a deal that makes sense.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear

    Astros Promote Brice Matthews

    Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

    Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers

    Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help

    Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays

    Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu

    Trevor Williams To Undergo UCL Surgery

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Recent

    Royals Receiving Interest In Catching Prospects

    J.C. Escarra Drawing Trade Attention

    Cristian Javier Begins Rehab Assignment

    Multiple Teams Showing Interest In DJ LeMahieu

    Rafael Devers Suffering From Disk Injury In Lower Back

    Mets’ Dedniel Nunez To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Trade Deadline Outlook: Seattle Mariners

    Reds Activate Jake Fraley, Option Christian Encarnacion-Strand

    Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear

    Cubs Select Brooks Kriske

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version