Headlines

  • Braves To Select Didier Fuentes
  • Anthopoulos On Trading Chris Sale: “Will Not Happen”
  • Rays Owner Stuart Sternberg In “Advanced” Talks To Sell Team
  • Rafael Devers To Start Work At First Base With Giants
  • Giants Acquire Rafael Devers
  • Shohei Ohtani To Make Dodgers Pitching Debut On Monday
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Pitching Notes: Hammel, Jays, Royals, Blevins, Blanton, Braves

By Steve Adams and Jeff Todd | February 1, 2017 at 10:57pm CDT

Let’s take a look in at the latest on the pitching market:

  • MLB Network’s Peter Gammons tweets that one Cubs official to whom he recently spoke believes that many teams around the league assumed Jason Hammel was injured when Chicago surprisingly decided to decline his seemingly reasonable $12MM club option. That’s not the case, however, per Gammons, who notes that Hammel is in good health. It’s been a surprisingly slow market for the 34-year-old Hammel, who looks to be the top remaining starter on the open market. The 2016 season saw Hammel toss 166 2/3 innings with a 3.83 ERA, 7.8 K/9, 2.9 BB/9 and a 42.1 percent ground-ball rate. Over the past three seasons, Hammel sports a 3.68 ERA, 8.3 K/9, 2.4 BB/9 and a 40 percent grounder rate. Hammel did see his strikeout and walk rates trend in the wrong direction last year, which contributed to a 4.48 FIP, 4.34 xFIP and 4.28 SIERA that are among his worst marks since establishing himself as a big league starter.
  • Despite adding lefty J.P. Howell, the Blue Jays are still looking for another pen arm, per Ben Nicholson-Smith of Sportsnet.ca (via Twitter). It doesn’t seem as if there’s a clear preference between a righty and a lefty, as the club is said to be exploring both varieties of pitchers.
  • Likewise, Royals GM Dayton Moore says that his club still intends to add another arm, though it’s not clear specifically whether it’ll be for a starter or reliever, as Jeffrey Flanagan of MLB.com was among those to tweet. Either the trade or the free agent market could hold the missing piece, the GM noted.
  • The Mets and left-hander Jerry Blevins “have been exchanging concepts” for some time now, writes ESPN’s Buster Olney, but the Mets have only proposed one-year scenarios to this point. Blevins is known to be seeking a multi-year pact and seemingly has a realistic shot of obtaining one. Payroll has reportedly been an issue for the Mets — their current projection of $146MM would be their second-highest Opening Day mark ever — though the New York Post reported yesterday that the Mets are open to pursuing a back-loaded deal, which could serve as a compromise of sorts.
  • Similarly, Olney notes that the Dodgers were very pleased with Joe Blanton last summer but have limited interest at this time after spending a combined $192MM to retain the trio of Kenley Jansen, Justin Turner and Rich Hill. Los Angeles is open to adding a reliever, but there have been rumors that they’re focused on one-year deals, and Olney’s mention of them does little to dispel that notion.
  • While there’s some uncertainty as to which left-handers will be working out of the Braves’ bullpen in 2017, Atlanta hasn’t expressed much interest in free agents such as Blevins, Javier Lopez, Boone Logan, Travis Wood and Chris Capuano, per David O’Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The Braves feel that those options are either too expensive or not definitive enough upgrades to sign. Ian Krol and Paco Rodriguez (if healthy) are likely to see significant work in the Atlanta relief corps this season, per O’Brien, who also runs down a number of other internal options.
  • Right-hander David Aardsma is slated to throw for interested teams tomorrow in hopes of landing an invite to Major League Spring Training somewhere. The 35-year-old last pitched in the Majors back in 2015, tossing 30 2/3 innings with the Braves and registering a 4.70 ERA. Aardsma has added about 20 pounds while following an Olympic weightlifting program in hopes of boosting his velocity. He struggled through a brief showing with Toronto’s Triple-A affiliate last season but turned in strong minor league results in 2014-15.
Share 0 Retweet 9 Send via email0

Atlanta Braves Chicago Cubs Kansas City Royals Los Angeles Dodgers New York Mets Toronto Blue Jays Boone Logan Chris Capuano David Aardsma Jason Hammel Jerry Blevins Joe Blanton

MLBTR Chat Transcript
Main
Latest On Desmond Jennings
View Comments (40)
Post a Comment

40 Comments

  1. TribeTown

    8 years ago

    Hammel is a legitimate number 3. Not sure why his market has been so slow

    Reply
    • davidcoonce74

      8 years ago

      I’m assuming that despite what was written here, his medicals aren’t so good. The cubs kept him out of the postseason for a reason and he ended the season injured with “forearm tightness”

      Reply
    • Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA

      8 years ago

      I’m not sure that’s true. His 2nd half slides have been documented and he’s never thrown more than 177ip. Add onto that he’s 34 going on 35. And you’re now questioning whether he can handle more than the 166 he threw last year. Granted he’s the best starter on the market. And yes, I do think he’s a solid #4. But this could get interesting, because we are now entering the one year contract range where guys are now more cognizant that they need a job.

      Reply
    • pullhitter445

      8 years ago

      He’s a #4 if not #5.

      1
      Reply
    • patborders92

      8 years ago

      He’s an NL only pitcher

      Reply
  2. dwilson10

    8 years ago

    This is about the time Duquette swoops in and gets a SP for cheap and I don’t see things changing this year. He has came out and said he wants to add a veteran starter and they like Hammel. Give it to the middle or end of next week and Hammel will be back with the Orioles.

    Reply
    • SamFuldsFive

      8 years ago

      Doubtful.

      Reply
  3. arcadia Ldogg

    8 years ago

    Wonder what the length of the contract he wants and will get be

    Reply
  4. astros_fan_84

    8 years ago

    Someone is going to sign Hammel and be very happy. I also think someone will sign Doug Foster and be happy till the all star break.

    Reply
  5. BlueSkyLA

    8 years ago

    How is Blanton not available for a one-year contract?

    Reply
    • thinkblech

      8 years ago

      Perhaps he is, at a number the Dodgers don’t like. I haven’t seen any kind of a number associated with him yet – have you?

      Reply
      • ravinefiend

        8 years ago

        He got 4m last year. Sounds reasonable to me but the Dodgers did just spend a lot of money to keep Jansen, Turner and Hill.

        Reply
        • thinkblech

          8 years ago

          On a one year deal, having done been a solid reliever two years running, just guessing here, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s holding out for 1/7 or 2/12, something along those lines.

          Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        8 years ago

        No. I was just responding to the article, which said that the Dodgers are still looking for relievers and appreciate Blanton’s work, but are focused on single-year contracts.

        Reply
        • thinkblech

          8 years ago

          Yeah, getting under the LT threshold next year seems like the big time priority, so, not surprising on the one year aspect.

          Reply
        • BlueSkyLA

          8 years ago

          Right, but I am still wondering where the idea comes from that Blanton would not be available on an annual. Given his age and the fact that he’d only be signed as a reliever, I figured he’d be right on the button for the Dodgers. Maybe Blanton is going hard after a second year now, but if so, we haven’t heard that.

          Reply
  6. chesteraarthur

    8 years ago

    if he’s not hurt, then the cubs not picking up his option is even more curious

    Reply
    • tim815

      8 years ago

      Wanted under the cap, likely.

      Reply
    • Frank Richard

      8 years ago

      No it’s not. He was open about how he wasn’t happy with his role last year. He was never allowed to pitch past the 6th if he was even allowed that far. He had some other disagreements with Joe Maddon also. I’m sure getting left off the playoff roster didn’t help the situation and it seemed that at the end of last season the Cubs were encouraged by what they saw from Montgomery. They also spoke to him and had a handshake agreement that they wouldn’t just pick his option up to trade him so he could ultimately make the decision where he wanted to sign.

      3
      Reply
      • hojostache

        8 years ago

        Spot on.

        I think a team could get a steal in Hammel if they have some depth and don’t need him to start 30 games a season. He can be a very serviceable #4 and at well below market value when you consider a guy like Pelfrey signed a 2/$16m last year to be a fringe #5.

        1
        Reply
        • chesteraarthur

          8 years ago

          This is exactly the cubs. They have 1-4 and then kinda 5s with nothing for sure. montgomery has never shown he can start, Anderson is a ticking time bomb, their options in the minors are less than inspiring. This is why I don’t think it made a lot of sense to let him go. I guess I should have said baseball sense. If he was really whining enough to upset people then, fine, I guess, but it still doesn’t make sense for a team with questions at sp to drop a guy like Hammel and hope that Montgomery can figure out how to throw enough strikes to be a starter or that Brett Anderson doesn’t just break, again.

          Reply
        • Red Ivy

          8 years ago

          Cubs traded Dan vogelbach for mike Montgomery. So one would assume the Cubs have high expectations for Montgomery considering the price paid.

          Reply
    • cubsfan2489

      8 years ago

      Chesterarthur, it’s really not that curious. Both sides agreed that it would best for him to go into free agency, because both sides thought he could get more in free agency. Surprisingly, he has not.

      1
      Reply
    • SamFuldsFive

      8 years ago

      He was the Cubs 5th Starter and would have made way too much money for that, not to mention he’s a primadonna and sucks in the second half. They don’t need him, as they will find innings elsewhere.

      Reply
  7. User 4245925809

    8 years ago

    Don’t see many guys who have TJ surgery, come back and lose velocity. Aardsma lost 3-4 ticks and the splitter, his out pitch had no bite without the velocity. He was lights out combining that 97 high rider, along with his filthy, in the dirt splitter in Seattle a couple seasons. If not mistaken.. he might have hit 98-99 in Boston before he sort of got his control in order later on. in Seattle.

    Reply
    • SuperSinker

      8 years ago

      There are tons of pitchers who fail after TJ.

      So many pitchers experience velocity gains because of the extensive rehab their arms are put through. So guys with weak shoulders will be put on intense rehab programs and build their arms stronger than they were pre-TJ. It’s not because of the procedure.

      Reply
      • User 4245925809

        8 years ago

        Guys that fail.. Yeah.. Hanrahan, Then guys who right away need another as well. I’m saying guys who come back medically healthy, but lose the velocity.

        Reply
  8. bobbyzedd

    8 years ago

    I’m glad the blue jays are still seeking more bullpen help but signing average at best pitchers will not win them a World Series, they need to make a serious effort to pick up one of the top relievers still available.

    Reply
    • jdgoat

      8 years ago

      I agree that they still need one of Blevins/Logan and maybe a guy like salas or Blanton but don’t forget relievers are very volatile. Howell could go back to the sub 2 ERA guy he’s consistently been and the others could blow up

      1
      Reply
    • jimmertee

      8 years ago

      I agree, Jays are going nowhere without adding 2 pitchers and they don’t have the money for it. They need a top of the rotation starter as well as a top notch reliever. Just because the rotation was great last year doesn’t mean the same guys will be that this year. Happ will take a moderate step back, Sanchez with be great, as stroman probably will be great too if he can eliminate his meltdown inning every-once-in-a-while; Estrada is a very good starter but I hear his back is putty; and Liriano is the wildcard -he is great every 2nd year, which means he sucks every second year – which year is it for him?

      Reply
      • patborders92

        8 years ago

        There are no top line starters available. We have an ace in Sanchez and 4 other quality arms, the subtraction of RA makes this rotation better, even if you factor in regression. The rotation is the last thing this team needs to address, we still probably have the best rotation in the division.

        2
        Reply
  9. The baseball kid

    8 years ago

    Aardsma is back boyz

    Reply
  10. lesterdnightfly

    8 years ago

    Which concepts have the Mets and Blevins been exchanging? The concepts of existentialism, ethnocentralism, dualism, free will? Or of time, virtue, moral responsibility… ?

    One hint that the Mets will sign Blevins is if they hire a Philosophy Coach.

    2
    Reply
    • hojostache

      8 years ago

      Knowing the Mets they would try and push Keith Hernandez into talking with him so they don’t have to shell out $100k* for a Philosophy Coach.

      *Obviously with deferred money, as the Mets can’ afford to just throw money around willy-nilly!

      1
      Reply
      • lesterdnightfly

        8 years ago

        Well said. Maybe hire Bobby Bonilla as Coach. He could discuss with Blevins the concept of Peace of Mind, as exemplified by a lifetime of lucrative annual payouts.

        1
        Reply
  11. alproof

    8 years ago

    Mets need Blevins AND Salas back.

    2
    Reply
  12. therealbdavis

    8 years ago

    So do the Braves know that Nolan Ryan is a free agent along with Greg Maddux? Oh maybe they can swing Jamie Moyer. Should rename themselves the Ancients with their pitching lineup.

    Reply
    • hojostache

      8 years ago

      Colon was arguably the 2nd or 3rd best pitcher available this off-season. He has been the most consistent pitcher for the Mets since they signed him. Dude is a god damn national treasure. He can still do a split!

      Dickey… I have no idea if he will be effective. I will be watching most of his starts this year bc I love watching knuckballers throw.

      Reply
  13. glassml

    8 years ago

    Good Lord anywhere but the TX Rangers. Hammel, Hamels…..Hamels, Hammel. Ugh

    Reply
  14. OPACY

    8 years ago

    Honestly, I thought Seattle might give Hammel a look. There might be something more to him than we know. Maybe not a good fit in a club house. But about 10 days to go until pitchers and catchers report and he has no where to go.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Braves To Select Didier Fuentes

    Anthopoulos On Trading Chris Sale: “Will Not Happen”

    Rays Owner Stuart Sternberg In “Advanced” Talks To Sell Team

    Rafael Devers To Start Work At First Base With Giants

    Giants Acquire Rafael Devers

    Shohei Ohtani To Make Dodgers Pitching Debut On Monday

    Roki Sasaki No Longer Throwing; No Timetable For Return

    Nationals To Promote Brady House

    White Sox, Brewers Swap Aaron Civale, Andrew Vaughn

    Justin Martínez To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Brewers’ Aaron Civale Requests Trade

    Angels To Promote Christian Moore

    Brewers Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Acquire Jorge Alcala

    Jackson Jobe To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Shane McClanahan Pauses Rehab, Seeking Further Opinions On Nerve Issue

    Royals Place Cole Ragans On IL With Rotator Cuff Strain

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    Recent

    Rockies Outright Keston Hiura

    Braves Designate Jose Ruiz For Assignment

    Marlins Outright Luarbert Arias

    Pablo Reyes Elects Free Agency

    Dodgers Select Jack Little

    Diamondbacks Sign Trevor Richards To Minor League Deal

    Latest On Cole Ragans

    Marlins Designate Connor Gillispie For Assignment

    Braves To Select Didier Fuentes

    Red Sox To Option Kristian Campbell

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version