Headlines

  • Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Yu Darvish Trade Rumors: Deadline Day

By Steve Adams | July 31, 2017 at 2:33pm CDT

It’s quite possible that today is Yu Darvish’s last day as a member of the Rangers organization. The Texas ace has drawn interest from several teams, with the Dodgers the most prominently linked club. However, Darvish has also been tied to the Yankees and the Indians to varying extents. The Astros are also said to have checked in, though the intra-division roadblock makes that notion a bit tougher. We’ll track all of the latest Darvish chatter in this post between now and the 4pm ET non-waiver trade deadline…

  • At this point, it seems that Darvish will either go to the Dodgers or stay put, per Bob Nightengale of USA Today (via Twitter). Given other indications that Los Angeles is focused elsewhere, it could be that the righty won’t end up changing hands today.
  • Yahoo’s Jeff Passan reports (via Twitter) that it’s “getting increasingly harder” to envision Darvish landing with the Dodgers, as the two sides “simply aren’t matching up.”

Earlier Updates

  • Bowden suggests that the Dodgers could look to pry lefty Alex Claudio away from the Rangers in a package deal alongside Darvish (Twitter link). Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News suggests the same, though he notes that it’d still require the Dodgers changing their stance on the inclusion of Verdugo or Buehler. Claudio, though, is just 25 years old and is controlled through 2021, so he’d be a nice long-term piece for L.A. He’s held lefties to a laughable .131/.169/.197 slash this year and has a masterful 70.5 percent ground-ball rate overall in 2017. However, he doesn’t miss many bats.
  • Yahoo’s Tim Brown tweets that the Indians “are not in on Darvish” at this time. Notably, Cleveland was reported by Hoynes to be in pursuit of Orioles closer Zach Britton.
  • ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick, however, hears that the Indians and Astros are both “hanging around” in the Darvish picture, but the Dodgers are Texas’ preferred trading partner (Twitter link). The Yankees’ interest in Darvish is dependent on the outcome of their talks for Sonny Gray, Crasnick adds.
  • Bowden tweets that the Astros, Indians and Dodgers are the three teams that are still in the mix for Darvish, and he again mentions Mejia’s name in connection to talks. Paul Hoynes of the Cleveland Plain Dealer tweets that the Indians are interested in Darvish only if the price tag drops.
  • While the Dodgers have generally regarded as the favorites for Darvish, their talks with the Rangers have essentially reached an impasse, tweets FanRag’s Jon Heyman. Los Angeles has reportedly been unwilling to part with the likes of top-ranked prospects Alex Verdugo, Walker Buehler and Yadier Alvarez for a half-season rental of Darvish, and it would seem that president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman has yet to budge in that regard.
  • The Rangers and Indians have spoken about a “Yu Darvish for Francisco Mejia type” of deal, tweets Jim Bowden of MLB Network Radio on SiriusXM. Including Mejia, the consensus top catching prospect in baseball, would be a steep price for Cleveland to pay for a rental, though the wording of the report leaves some wiggle room for other pieces to potentially be involved. The 21-year-old Mejia is hitting .317/.367/.520 with 10 homers through his first 279 plate appearances in Double-A and ranked as baseball’s sixth-best prospect on Keith Law’s midseason list. MLB.com pegged him 16th overall, while Baseball America had him 18th. Cleveland is on Darvish’s no-trade list, though it remains possible that he could waive that right for a clearer shot at the postseason.
Share 0 Retweet 3 Send via email0

Cleveland Guardians Houston Astros Los Angeles Dodgers New York Yankees Texas Rangers Alex Claudio Francisco Mejia Yu Darvish

Angels Nearing David Hernandez Trade
Main
Padres Likely Won’t Trade Brad Hand
View Comments (85)
Post a Comment

85 Comments

  1. MiamiPhins34

    8 years ago

    Do it JD

    Reply
    • godhates216

      8 years ago

      Don’t do it CA! Rangers can sign him in the offseason and keep the prospects Indians give them!

      Reply
      • cbf82

        8 years ago

        Do it JD!

        Reply
      • anthodaniel

        8 years ago

        Duh he is a rental. You are trying to win bonehead. You want prospects or a better chance to win now??

        Reply
  2. dug

    8 years ago

    Um yes please

    Reply
  3. rich37

    8 years ago

    As an Indian fan, I think trading Meija is a mistake. He is the Tribe catcher of the near future and way beyond.He is way better than Gomes and Perez. Lets hope Darvish rejects a trade to Cleveland. They dodged a bullet last year with Lucroy

    Reply
    • Clevelandsports4life

      8 years ago

      I 100 percent agree

      Reply
    • hrush28

      8 years ago

      I definitely agree, the Indians can’t just give away their top prospect and the 16th best prospect overall for a rental. They need to keep Mejia and Triston McKenzie and give the rangers a lower prospect

      Reply
    • Solaris611

      8 years ago

      Mejia has been tearing up the minors big time for the last year and a half which made the extension Tribe gave to Roberto Perez all the more puzzling. CLE seems intent on Gomes as the starting C, and he’s signed through 2020. Mejia is about to force their hand very soon.

      Reply
      • Polish Hammer

        8 years ago

        Resigning Perez was the right deal to make at the time. He’s a solid backup and good defensive catcher so he can be dealt easily once Mejia comes up for good.

        Reply
  4. Free Clay Zavada

    8 years ago

    I don’t know, I just don’t trust Darvish to be that difference maker going forward. He’s been shaky this year….I know he’d improve any rotation, but is he really worth the asking price?

    Reply
    • charles stevens

      8 years ago

      He’s had one really bad start. His win-loss record is crap because they don’t score for him. The guy is a legitimate ace and not many others I would rather have on the mound in game 7 of a playoff game.

      2
      Reply
      • darkstar61

        8 years ago

        One bad game? He’s got fairly torched in 3 of his last 8 starts – hence the ERA jumping from 3.03 to 4.01 over that stretch

        2
        Reply
      • Free Clay Zavada

        8 years ago

        I agree with darkstar, the record of shakiness extends beyond the one start. And I didn’t even bring up win-loss record so I’m not sure why that’s getting mentioned.

        1
        Reply
    • Flurry

      8 years ago

      Darvish is actually doing great this year. You can’t just go off win/loss because the Rangers haven’t scored for him at all this year. I believe Darvish has one of the lowest run support numbers in all of baseball this year. Darvish has had maybe two bad starts all year. the biggest problem with Darvish is he isn’t going to give you more than 7 innings in a game at best. I believe he averages 6 1/3 innings pitched a game this year.

      Reply
      • chesteraarthur

        8 years ago

        He has a 4 ERA and 4 FIP, its not just his W/L record

        Reply
        • anthodaniel

          8 years ago

          Try to pay attention. He has had no Run support, among worst in BB and his ERA was 3.46 before the 7/26 game vs Marlins where he was tipping his pitches.

          Reply
        • herecomethephillies2018

          8 years ago

          Try to pay attention. Run support has nothing to do with his ERA or FIP. Saying “His stats would be better if you removed Game X” is a dangerous game to play. What player wouldn’t have better numbers if you removed his worst game? You could also flip that and say his numbers would be worse if you took away his gem against TB on 7/21.

          Fact of the matter is his ERA has steadily risen since the middle of May. He’s barely a year removed from returning from Tommy John surgery, and is a rental. I think it’s natural for people to be nervous for their team to hand over their top prospects for a guy who’s best days are more than likely behind him at this point.

          Reply
        • Bruin1012

          8 years ago

          I doubt it’s the worst run support in baseball is like to see the link that he has had worse run support then Porcello this year.

          Reply
    • anthodaniel

      8 years ago

      Never up, never in! Your team is still thinking like s loser. As currently constructed, Astros kick your ass.

      Reply
      • Polish Hammer

        8 years ago

        Great response, take your ball and run…

        Reply
  5. Thomas Magnum

    8 years ago

    If the Tribe lets meija go they better be getting darvish, beltre and mazara in return.

    Reply
    • ntmartin2010

      8 years ago

      Don’t be ridiculous!

      Reply
    • ntmartin2010

      8 years ago

      If anything Rangers are going to include Keone Kela in the deal who has 3 years on his contract remaining

      1
      Reply
      • anthodaniel

        8 years ago

        Say it ain’t so Joe! Kela stays. Claudio goes. Look at his stats. Unhittable

        Reply
    • Clevelandsports4life

      8 years ago

      That sounds about right

      Reply
    • RangersFanCD19

      8 years ago

      You’re insane…as a rangers fan I agree Mejia is probably too much to lose, but including Beltre and Mazara is idiotic

      Reply
      • anthodaniel

        8 years ago

        Just ignorant

        Reply
    • tsc32

      8 years ago

      Laughable how much value some fans put in a prospect

      Reply
  6. xstpx

    8 years ago

    I love Darvish. But you can’t sell the farm for a rental. Look at the Price trade to Toronto.

    Reply
    • max l

      8 years ago

      Price got the Jays to their first playoffs in 22 years and Norris & Boyd have been mostly below average with Detroit. I would do that trade again 99 times out of 99 times.

      1
      Reply
  7. camarillocardinal

    8 years ago

    Mejia is a legit elite prospect …… similar to Gleyber Torres last year.

    I wouldn’t do it but if it means a real shot at a World Series title It is a compelling rationale.

    Reply
    • anthodaniel

      8 years ago

      Teams have to take their WS shots as they come. 75% of prospects never produce / that’s why they are PROSPECTS.

      Reply
  8. charles stevens

    8 years ago

    I would imagine to haul in a prospect of that caliber the deal will have more than just Darvish going to CLE.

    Probably takes a BP piece like Kela or Claudio plus someone like Gomez or Napoli as throw ins. I’m sure Tito would love to have Nap back in the clubhouse for a pennant push.

    Reply
    • charles stevens

      8 years ago

      Then again this could all be smoke and mirrors to make the Dodgers blink.

      Reply
    • ThePriceWasRight

      8 years ago

      You seriously think for an ace like darvish and a young arm in Kela + it would only take meija? You my friend are dillusional.

      1
      Reply
      • charles stevens

        8 years ago

        Obviously he’s the centerpiece and a couple others of lesser status would also come back to TX. I’m not your friend so go pound sand.

        Reply
      • mixtecamictlan

        8 years ago

        Look what the Whïťĕ sox got for Quintana I know he has an additional year but Eloy who is way better than Mejia.

        Reply
        • Steve Adams

          8 years ago

          Quintana has three years of control beyond 2017. You can’t compare his trade return to a Darvish return — they’re wildly different assets due to Quintana’s contractual status.

          5
          Reply
        • alexgordonbeckham

          8 years ago

          The truth gets a downvote?

          Reply
    • Clevelandsports4life

      8 years ago

      They already have EE and Carlos

      Reply
  9. kehoet83

    8 years ago

    Darvish is a 5 inning pitcher that strikes out 10. He wears out a bullpen. I wouldn’t give a top prospect for him especially for 2 months of service. I would set my sights on Lance Lynn.

    1
    Reply
    • No Big League Choo For Yu

      8 years ago

      I am not going to argue that the Indians should trade Mejia for Darvish, but what you said is just incorrect. Even with his last horrendous start, he is averaging about 6 1/3 innings pitched per start this year. But let’s not let facts get in the way of our arguments, right?

      3
      Reply
    • claymc

      8 years ago

      Even if you assume that Darvish doesn’t last as long as other starters, with expanded September line-ups and stretched out October series, this is precisely the time of year when shorter outings hurts you less. His status as an expensive rental should be concerning, but a risk to the bullpen? Nah.

      Reply
    • Sibert18

      8 years ago

      Lol get your facts straight dude. He averages 6+ innings a game. Same as Kershaw almost

      Reply
    • tsc32

      8 years ago

      Love when clueless people act like they know what they’re talking about

      Reply
  10. sufferforsnakes

    8 years ago

    If the Tribe trades Mejia for Darvish, they’re gonna piss off many of their fans, me included.
    Darvish is a rental, Mejia is the future.

    Reply
    • indiansfan44

      8 years ago

      That’s where the problem comes into the this. I don’t think the Indians front office sees him as the future or they wouldn’t of signed Perez to the extension they did before the season. Gomes was already signed through 2019 plus 2 options and now with Perez you have 2 catchers under contract until 2020 at least. Mejia will be ready well before that time. They are hoping one of them will hit better but when you look at it they were almost showing he was a trade chip.

      I almost never view prospects as untouchables and while I agree that he may be the future catcher I would be ok with trading Mejia but only in the right deal. For a 2 month rental he should never be in the discussion no matter who it is.

      Reply
  11. sufferforsnakes

    8 years ago

    Where did my comment disappear to?

    Reply
    • Polish Hammer

      8 years ago

      Me too, I had several here that vaporized and for no reason.

      Reply
  12. tarheels23

    8 years ago

    I like dervish to my Dodgers but I would not give up the farm for a rental

    Reply
    • tsc32

      8 years ago

      I don’t think you’d have to give up the farm. One of Buehler or Verdugo and then some lesser prospects. I’d love to get Buehler/Verdugo, Heredia and May. Rangers would be getting one top 100 guy and then two outside the Dodgers top 10 with that

      1
      Reply
      • norcalblue

        8 years ago

        Reset those expectations fella.

        Reply
  13. crazy4cleveland

    8 years ago

    PLEASE don’t trade Mejia

    Reply
  14. Priggs89

    8 years ago

    As a White Sox fan, I’m 100% on board with this trade. Go Cleveland.

    Reply
  15. The Ghost of Bobby Bonilla

    8 years ago

    Mejia for Darvish would be pure insanity by Cleveland. Darvish gives you what, 7 starts down the stretch and is no better than a #3 in a playoff rotation behind Kluber, Carrasco, and maybe even a #4 if Salazar keeps pitching lights out?

    That would be a horrendously dumb move by CLE. SP is not their biggest need. They need a LOOGY and maybe some depth at RF or 2B. If you’re going to deal Mejia, it better be to PIT with another guy or two for Harrison/Watson/McCutchen.

    1
    Reply
    • tsc32

      8 years ago

      Lol Carrasco and Salazar aren’t better than Darvish

      Reply
      • Polish Hammer

        8 years ago

        A couple starts out of a soon departing via free agency Darvish is not better than Carrasco and Mejia or Salazar and Mejia.

        Reply
      • Polish Hammer

        8 years ago

        The short term rental is not worth Mejia, so Mejia and either of those guys is worth far more to the Tribe than Darvish.

        Reply
  16. Iron Horse

    8 years ago

    This Mejia talk could just be smoke to get the Dodgers to blink and part with Verdugo or Buehler.

    Reply
    • norcalblue

      8 years ago

      Well that theory sure made sense…..

      Reply
  17. Iron Horse

    8 years ago

    Also, look who’s pushing the Mejia-Darvish stuff – Jim Bowden, who’s a buffoon. Responsible journos closest to the situation like Hoynes aren’t.

    Reply
    • sufferforsnakes

      8 years ago

      Bingo.

      Reply
  18. Pihc123

    8 years ago

    No to Mejia being traded.

    Reply
  19. ctguy

    8 years ago

    Dodgers shouldn’t give up too much for Darvish. He has publicly stated he loves it in Texas and doesn’t want to leave. He’ll be headed back there after the season.

    1
    Reply
    • BlueSkyLA

      8 years ago

      They’d be getting him for now. That’s why it’s called a rental.

      1
      Reply
    • tsc32

      8 years ago

      I think LAD would have a good change at re-signing him

      Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        8 years ago

        He’ll be a free agent so same chance, whether they rent him for the end of the season, or not. The only advantage the Rangers potentially get is if they hang onto him and he’s extended a QO.

        Reply
  20. bleedsblueinAR

    8 years ago

    Do not give up any of the three – Verdugo, Buehler, Yadi, just for Darvish. However, with the inclusion of a LH bullpen piece, that might be enough. We are already looking into other relievers, this may be the one more that works best while only giving up ONE of the three above with one or two lower tiered prospects.

    Reply
    • DPhill

      8 years ago

      Yu scares me a little, I do like Claudio as a bullpen piece. I’d give up Verdugo for both those guys.

      Reply
      • TedsFrozenHead 2

        8 years ago

        Yup. Verdugo looks like another Jerry Sands. Give him up, Andy!

        Reply
  21. drstevenhorn

    8 years ago

    All the Dodgers did after losing Kershaw is win 7 straight games. Do not give up the farm for any of these guys.

    Reply
    • hiflew

      8 years ago

      Regular season wins over the Giants are not the reason Dodgers would be acquiring Darvish. Would winning 105 games in the regular season and then losing in the playoffs with Verdugo and Buehler in the minors would be acceptable for fans?

      Reply
      • dodgerfan711

        8 years ago

        Verdugo and Buehler will be on the big club in october

        Reply
        • TedsFrozenHead 2

          8 years ago

          Verdugo is way too average to protect right now. Make the trade.

          Reply
  22. 1980MVP

    8 years ago

    I’d rather have Sonny or Verlander.

    Reply
  23. hunthutch

    8 years ago

    Dodgers rangers not matching up means that the rangers keep asking for verdugo buelher or Alvarez and the dodgers are holding out

    Reply
    • BlueSkyLA

      8 years ago

      Well, yeah, these things often come down to who blinks first.

      Reply
  24. bleedsblueinAR

    8 years ago

    This is going down to the last hour, but I still see the trade happening with 3 prospects not named Verduo, Alvarez, Buehler, Calhoun or Kendall. I’ve also read that Mitchell White will not be moving either.

    This should be interesting.

    Reply
    • tsc32

      8 years ago

      Lol you see the Rangers giving up Darvish to the Darvish but the Dodgers giving up none of their top 5? It would take one of Buehler/Verdugo or at two of the others in top 6 guys. You won’t get him if the Dodgers are unrealistically making everyone of value untouchable. That’s just silly. Rangers aren’t giving up an elite rotation are for nothing

      Reply
      • Kershiser

        8 years ago

        They will be giving him up for a roughly 80th overall pick in next years draft in about 30 minutes… they should really take the best deal on the table at this point as long as it’s better than an 80th overall pick…

        Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          8 years ago

          I mean you’re not wrong but in the real world that just doesn’t happen. The same way that my team isn’t trading all of their pending FA’s despite being nowhere near a playoff spot and those guys not even being worth QO’s like Darvish is.

          Reply
  25. dodgersfanjoel

    8 years ago

    The Dodgers are gonna have to part with one of there prospects and I don’t see why they don’t part with Verdugo because they already have many young and middle age outfielders and they have the money to resign Darvish at the end of the year

    Reply
    • TedsFrozenHead 2

      8 years ago

      +1

      Reply
  26. AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

    8 years ago

    What happened to the Dodgers being 100% certain that they would acquired Gray, Verlander or Darvish? We already know Gray isn’t happening.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Recent

    Pirates Re-Sign Tanner Rainey To Minor League Deal

    Giants Place Matt Chapman On 10-Day Injured List

    Mariners’ Bryce Miller Out Four To Six Weeks With Elbow Inflammation

    Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is “North Of Zero”

    Diamondbacks Place Justin Martínez On IL With UCL Sprain

    Orioles Select Luis Vázquez

    Rangers To Sign Craig Kimbrel To Minor League Deal

    Akil Baddoo Accepts Outright Assignment With Tigers

    Dodgers Recall Matt Sauer, DFA José Ureña

    Chris Stratton Elects Free Agency

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version