Headlines

  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Padres Designate Bryan Mitchell, Expected To Promote Nick Margevicius

By Jeff Todd | March 28, 2019 at 10:59am CDT

10:59am: The Friars have a surprising plan in place for one aspect of their early-season roster maneuvering. They’ll promote young lefty Nick Margevicius to start Saturday’s game, per Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune (via Twitter).

Margevicius, a 2017 seventh-round draft pick, has not pitched above the High-A level.

10:37am: As expected, the Padres announced today that they have selected the contract of top prospect Fernando Tatis Jr. To open roster space, the club designated righty Bryan Mitchell for assignment.

While the Tatis promotion was already known, the decision to drop Mitchell is rather fascinating. The righty had seemed in line for a rotation spot despite an ugly spring showing. Instead, the Friars will carry six outfielders on their initial roster after claiming Socrates Brito yesterday.

Clearly, something has to give. It seems that the organization is opening with an unbalanced roster alignment in order to hang onto resources. Some early-season transactions seem all but inevitable; whether that’ll involve an outside acquisition or internal promotion remains to be seen.

It seems likely that Mitchell will end up clearing waivers and remaining in the organization, so this may not be the end of the line for him. But the move still represents an acknowledgement that things haven’t worked out as hoped. The San Diego organization effectively purchased his rights in a swap last winter from the Yankees, but Mitchell coughed up 44 earned runs and carried a brutal 38:43 K/BB ratio in 73 MLB frames in 2018.

Share 0 Retweet 14 Send via email0

San Diego Padres Bryan Mitchell Fernando Tatis Jr. Nick Margevicius

Athletics Acquire Kendrys Morales
Main
Giants Designate Mac Williamson, Alen Hanson, Tom Murphy
View Comments (96)
Post a Comment

96 Comments

  1. a1544

    6 years ago

    Cashman is prellar’s dad

    3
    Reply
    • jdgoat

      6 years ago

      Ya what a fleecing that was…

      1
      Reply
      • gleybertorres25

        6 years ago

        Yeah. Blash didn’t play for the yankees

        Reply
        • U4gotSouza

          6 years ago

          Yanks never expected Blash to play. All about the Benjamin’s baby

          2
          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Yep. Jabari Blash was a non-factor in that trade. The only reason the Yankees acquired him was because the rules said they had to get something in return. They couldn’t just give the Padres Bryan Mitchell and Chase Headley for nothing.

          1
          Reply
  2. The Human Toilet

    6 years ago

    I don’t get why the claimed Brito, I think they already had plenty of OF help on the team.

    2
    Reply
    • SDHotDawg

      6 years ago

      From his first season, Preller has had a history of poor – almost stupid – roster management.

      Reply
  3. mt in baltimore

    6 years ago

    You are going to like Baltimore Mr. Mitchell.

    2
    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      6 years ago

      tell that to every waiver pitcher they passed on over the winter.

      Reply
  4. phenomenalajs

    6 years ago

    I wonder if they’re looking at James Shields. He already lives in San Diego. How ironic would it be for Shields and Tatis both to be on the active roster together after the trade several years ago?

    1
    Reply
    • msmithwa

      6 years ago

      Don’t forget Myers already has ties to Shields.

      Reply
    • Grizalt

      6 years ago

      youtu.be/O57ReCGisds

      1
      Reply
  5. lowtalker1

    6 years ago

    He wasn’t in line with a rotation a lot
    He was in line for a bullpen spot but there are better options with options

    Reply
  6. Kwflanne

    6 years ago

    Wow. Those “top prospects” Logan Allen and Cal Quantrill couldn’t lock down the rotation spot, so they go with Margevicius?!?! This is a head scratcher. He’s a college pitcher, so he’s not exactly raw. But jumping him from high A ball to the majors?? Shows a real lack of confidence in Allen/Quantrill….

    3
    Reply
    • beersy

      6 years ago

      Or it shows that the Padres see Allen/Quantrill as bigger part of their future and don’t want to bring them up too early. Both of these players were acquired by this regime, so I am sure they have confidence in them.

      2
      Reply
      • Kwflanne

        6 years ago

        Don’t want to bring them up too soon??? See: Chris Paddack, Fernando Tatis Jr….. yeah, I don’t think they are worried about it being too soon

        3
        Reply
        • beersy

          6 years ago

          Paddack was dominant in Spring Training and the other 2 scuffled, can you really compare them? Tatis Jr. is the 2nd best prospect in the game, again can you really compare a who is top 75-100 and another who fell out of most/all top 100 lists?

          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          One of these things is not like the others…

          2
          Reply
        • Kwflanne

          6 years ago

          Yes, you can compare them when you say the reasoning they aren’t brought up is because they don’t want to bring them up too soon….. so which is it? Is it too soon?? Because that logic doesn’t work when there are players with less experience being called up. Or is it that they simply weren’t good enough?? Sounds like you might just be making excuses. You can’t say they aren’t calling them up because it’s too soon…. and then have them call up people even “sooner” like tatis/Paddack. Time isn’t the same as talent. So you’re argument was time….. mine is talent. They weren’t good enough. Period. Not “it’s too soon”

          Reply
        • msmithwa

          6 years ago

          Not good enough yet is more like it. Why not bring Mackenzie Gore? Quantrill’s and Logan’s time will come

          2
          Reply
        • Comrade Tipsy McStagger

          6 years ago

          But Beersy, don’t you understand? Let me explain it to you.

          We have prospect A, and Prospect A gets promoted. We have Prospect B and they don’t get promoted? But they are both prospects. They should all be promoted.

          No, I will not listen to any rational argument. Prospect A was promoted and there are no other factors other than the fact that prospect A is a prospect. I don’t care about how they did in spring training. Prospect A is a prospect. All prospects are equal on my graphing paper.

          If Prospect A was promoted, my graphing papers says Prospect B should be promoted. They share the same variable: Prospect.

          No, I don’t care about spring training or scouting analysis. Prospect A was promoted. It means you can’t send Prospect B down. No, I will not listen. You should listen to me. Shut up and listen to me. But Prospect. Prospect. Prospect.

          3
          Reply
        • Comrade Tipsy McStagger

          6 years ago

          All right, who hacked my damn account?

          Reply
        • Comrade Tipsy McStagger

          6 years ago

          I did.

          1
          Reply
        • Comrade Tipsy McStagger

          6 years ago

          Thanks Tipsy. That is the second time you made me piss my pants at work in the past month. Yeah, I think you summed up pretty well some of the weird arguments being made on this site. We all have our abilities, I guess. Some people are just really really really really overly rational, causing them to get stuck in their own tunnel vision. Well done response. Now, where’d I put that extra pair of shorts…

          Reply
        • beersy

          6 years ago

          Thank you for helping me understand, I was way off. 🙂

          1
          Reply
        • Comrade Tipsy McStagger

          6 years ago

          Trillary — May I suggest wearing a diaper? Or you can do what I do and wear a bleacher buddy. I just strap a bladder onto my right leg, hook up a catheter, and have the most amazing work conversations, looking directly into people’s eyes as I fill up my bladder. Just don’t spill the damn thing, because one time in the middle of a finance meeting, well….uh…let’s just say I didn’t get that promotion.

          1
          Reply
        • davidcoonce74

          6 years ago

          It’s too soon because they aren’t ready. Paddack and Tatis are. And apparently Margevicious is ready as well. The Padres haven’t been big on the service time manipulation stuff.

          Reply
        • boltz82

          6 years ago

          These trolls either don’t get it or try to stir the pot. Paddack was dominant this spring and even more so last year. Allen struggled this spring and both would benefit from some time at AAA. And yes, Tatis is the #2 prospect in all of baseball but should in all likelihood be #1. VGJ can rake but is fat and has no position. He is a two tool player. Good two tools but that’s it. Tatis has it all.

          Reply
        • boltz82

          6 years ago

          You couldn’t be more off base. Paddack and Tatis while young showed that they were ready to make the advances to the pros. Allen and Quantrill showed that they could use some further seasoning. That’s how the game is. Some blossom faster than others. Paul Molitor was sent back down for more work and Yount started as a 19 year old. They both made the Hall of Fame. Not everyone is on the same time frame. There isn’t one set standard. I suspect you know that as you clearly like to troll here.

          1
          Reply
        • boltz82

          6 years ago

          Margevicious is in all likelihood the sacrificial lamb. Starting him gives Allen and Quantrill time in AAA and not pushing them up to get shell shocked. I could see them using him like they did Strahm last year on bullpen days.

          Reply
        • bucnole31658

          6 years ago

          Pitchers are different

          1
          Reply
        • bucnole31658

          6 years ago

          Well thank God no one else in the world thinks like you.

          Reply
    • DarkSide830

      6 years ago

      neither wowed in spring

      Reply
      • Kwflanne

        6 years ago

        Absolutely right. They were actually prettt bad. But Margevicius didn’t exactly light up high a ball last year with his 4.30 ERA…. just goes to show how quickly “highly touted” prospects could fall… i.e. Quantrill no longer in the top 100 and won’t be surprised if Allen isn’t either by seasons end… I’ve never been very high on Allen, but I was dead wrong about Quantrill…. I had huge hopes for him coming out of Stanford. Oops

        1
        Reply
        • beersy

          6 years ago

          You’ve “never been very high” on any Padre player or prospect.

          Reply
        • Kwflanne

          6 years ago

          Reading seems difficult for you…. as I just posted that I was high on Quantrill (and wrong). Until you are able to grasp simple reading comprehension…. probably best to just not reply to me.

          Reply
        • beersy

          6 years ago

          You have been spewing negative thoughts about the Padre for months now and then you say that “you were once high” on one prospect and I can’t read? Saying one somewhat positive thing, does not make all of the other negative things go away. I won’t bother replying to anymore of your posts, not because of my reading ability, but because I won’t bother reading any more of you posts. Have a good season, Go Padres!

          Reply
        • SDHotDawg

          6 years ago

          You can’t predict prospects. It doesn’t matter how highly “ranked” they are or how they perform in the minors. All you can do is hope you’ve got one that can perform in the big leagues. They are all unknown entities until they show who they are in the Major Leagues.

          Reply
    • Grizalt

      6 years ago

      No, it shows that Allen and Quantrill aren’t ready. Idk if Margevicius either but if Spring Training is any indication he is the most ready of the 3.

      Reply
  7. beersy

    6 years ago

    Service time be damned!!! I’m sure Margevicius will be sent down at some point this year to gain the extra year of control, but sending Tatis Jr. down unless he is totally bombing, will be very difficult.

    Reply
    • Grizalt

      6 years ago

      Margevicius isn’t ranked among the Padres’ top 30 prospects. If they weren’t worried about the extra year on leaguewide top 100 prospects like Manuel Margot, Chris Paddack and Fernando Tatis Jr they obviously won’t worry about it on Margevicius.

      1
      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        6 years ago

        Yeah, if you’re not worrying about Tatis then someone off the top 30 isn’t even going to make him blink. I think preller has to be careful with calling these guys who aren’t rule 5 eligible up too early though. When you have the most stacked system in the minors you have to protect as many guys as you can. It won’t be a consideration until the offseason but they have a number of guys they’ll need to add for sure and inevitably you’ll find a couple guys who pop up this year that they’d probably want to keep. He’s been fortunate in the past no one has scooped up guys like Reyes who were left off the 40 man.

        Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Preller doesn’t seem interested in service time manipulation but he definitely takes the Rule 5 thing into account. Everyone called up after the trade deadline last year was going to be Rule 5 eligible. I’m thinking with the exception of Margevicius it will be the same this year.

          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          Well that’s good I figure he doesn’t have too many additional slots to burn on guys who aren’t eligible. Assuming he wants to add some sort of major league talent to this roster next year.

          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          Or he finally clears out some of that logjam in the OF. I can’t believe he’s going with 6 guys to start the season. That’s crazy.

          1
          Reply
        • nypadre66

          6 years ago

          No crazier than 4 catchers to start the season a few years back.

          1
          Reply
    • bucnole31658

      6 years ago

      With the way contracts are moving to everyone signing extensions early and the next CBA likely to eliminate most of the service time loop holes, it’s likely to become less and less an issue

      Reply
  8. I Believe We Can Win

    6 years ago

    They gotta trade Myers. Reyes and Renfroe both need at bats. Brito makes sense if you’re gonna season cordero at triple a.

    Pirela needs to go and let garcia and kinsler be the super utility guys once urias is back up.

    Glad Mitchell’s gone but pirela and Perdomo need to be next.

    Reply
    • Kwflanne

      6 years ago

      Pirela has been sent to the minors

      Reply
      • I Believe We Can Win

        6 years ago

        Still holds a 40 man spot.

        Reply
        • Kwflanne

          6 years ago

          Correct. I was just referring to the majors roster for that “super utility” spot you mentioned

          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Has a minor league option and the Padres have guys who can be moved to the 60-day IL to clear space on the 40-man roster if they need it. They’re not going to DFA Pirela just yet, much as I don’t like him.

          Reply
        • towinagain

          6 years ago

          Lets enjoy this first month. I was really impressed Margevicius! Poise. He adjusted in his starts, threw quality pitches. Watch him really surprise people!

          Reply
        • SDHotDawg

          6 years ago

          I hope you’re right about Margevicius. He hasn’t pitched above A ball, and development matters. Does Preller miss having a Rule 5 guy on the team? Hopefully, the kid surprises the heck out of us.

          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Was a combination of things. Padres needed a fifth starter, Preller chose to give a chance to the young in-house guys rather than overpay in cash or prospects to acquire a veteran from outside the org and everyone who was ahead of Margevicius for that last spot is either injured (Lamet, Nix) or tanked in Spring Training (Allen, Quantrill).

          Reply
    • Grizalt

      6 years ago

      Yeah, Renfroe is never going to get a real chance as long as Myers is there.

      2
      Reply
      • SDHotDawg

        6 years ago

        Renfroe’s gone. He’s not a “Preller guy” as much as Margot IS a “Preller guy.”

        And it sucks. Renfroe will be .250-ish, 30HR guy with a great arm in RF for somebody. But it won’t be us.

        Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Hedges and Reyes aren’t “Preller guys”

          Reply
        • SDHotDawg

          6 years ago

          From day one, Preller has been loading the org wih catchers – from the draft, to Rule 5, to trading an All-Star closer and young reliever for yet another one.

          Outfielders? You may have noticed our roster … You may have also noticed how Margot has been handled from the day he was called up … You may also remember that Preller acquired Myers specifically to play CF (just like he appointed Mitchell to the rotation).

          Yeah, there are arguments to be made on either side.

          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Has nothing to do with my comment

          Reply
    • dvmin98

      6 years ago

      Myers is going to have a great year. I predict Renfroe will be the first to go. He is worse version of Reyes

      Reply
      • Grizalt

        6 years ago

        That you boot?

        2
        Reply
      • Comrade Tipsy McStagger

        6 years ago

        I agree dvm. I think Myers has a superstar waiting to break out. I certainly hope so. And many baseball analysts today seem to think Reyes is on the verge of a breakout. Some have even suggested he may lead the league in homeruns. It is too bad that Renfroe’s trade value is probably the lowest it can get right now. I know we need pitching, but here is my pitch. Trade Margot, Renfroe, and a catcher (Hedges/Mejia) for Byron Buxton. I want him out there in center. And I think he is about to really break out. I doubt the Twins would do it, even for that package, but man….

        1
        Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Would make way more sense to stick with Margot tbh.

          And Myers probably is what he is at this point.

          Reply
        • Comrade Tipsy McStagger

          6 years ago

          I’d take Buxton for Margot and Hedges/Mejia. But I don’t think the Twins would want Renfroe. Their OF would be set with Margot. Maybe, though. It would remove some clutter and we would have the best CF in all of baseball (defensively), which would be quite useful at Petco. Twins wouldn’t do it though. And anything beyond this would be too much to give up for a players that still hasn’t proven himself consistently. Call up Preller and put the idea in his head. Maybe his subconscious will force him into it.

          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          Twins already gave up on one CF too early. They aren’t doing it again. Castro/Garver isn’t a bad catching tandem either.

          Reply
    • ShieldF123

      6 years ago

      No one is taking Myers. Can’t trade what no one wants

      Reply
  9. Edelapena08

    6 years ago

    Bryan Mitchell was a waste of an MLB roster spot anyway.

    So as of now:

    Lauer
    Lucchesi
    Margevicius
    Strahm
    Paddack

    (Very L heavy, which leads me to believe that we will be trading one of these guys later for a bonefish RH SP)

    OD against Bumgarner:
    Kinsler
    Hosmer
    Machado
    Reyes
    Myers
    Tatis
    Margot
    Hedges
    Lauer

    Bench:
    Renfroe (has good numbers against Madbum)
    Pirela or Garcia? Or both??
    Mejia
    Cordero or Brito?? Or both??

    The pen I feel like should be:

    Warren
    Solis
    Erlin
    Maton
    Stock
    Wingenter
    Stammen
    Yates

    Reply
    • Kwflanne

      6 years ago

      I really hope they don’t bat tatis that low in the lineup…. but knowing the Padres, they will. That’s terrible for him, as he has a tendency to chase and strikeout, and why would he get a lot of good pitches to hit with bats like Margot and hedges to protect him? I hate it….
      He should be at the top of the lineup, where he has been having success his entire career.

      1
      Reply
      • Grizalt

        6 years ago

        Why would he get a lot of good pitches to hit if the pitcher knows he will chase the bad ones, regardless of who is batting behind him?

        Reply
      • boltz82

        6 years ago

        Well, you missed this one. Batted sixth and got two hits.

        Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      That’s a rough rotation. But they are seeing all the young guys. Can’t deny that.

      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        6 years ago

        I wonder if preller is backing himself into a future 40 man jam with all these call ups. Margevicius wouldn’t have been rule 5 eligible for 2 more years. Tatis too but obviously you’re not going to keep him down for very long regardless. They had to move a number of guys this offseason due to the 40 man crunch. Don’t know if this was necessarily the smartest move to do it now. 3 guys on the 60 day who will eventually have a spot in Richards, Lamet, and Castillo. Then you’ll need to add Allen, Naylor, and Quantrill as well. That’s just off the top of my head.

        Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          Tatis would have been Rule 5 eligible after this season. Signed in 2015.

          Reply
    • bleacherbum

      6 years ago

      Loup signed a major league deal. He will be in the bullpen.

      Reply
  10. nmc420theambassador

    6 years ago

    i’m only here to laugh in @cuckburns/outinLF/padsfans/websoulsurfer’s face because the assssss eating mitchell is unemployed. dollar says cuckburns will flag this comment because he’s salty AF. that kid is a dummy

    2
    Reply
    • lowtalker1

      6 years ago

      Haha. Burns. I know he is here. Took you long enough to block me.

      Reply
    • Grizalt

      6 years ago

      It’s Koamalu now. Get with the program!

      1
      Reply
  11. top jimmy

    6 years ago

    I’ve always said Mitchell would make a much better reliever than he would a starter. Doesn’t have the repertoire to go through the lineup 3 or more times. But still think he could be an effective reliever if he can end up with a team that will use him that way.

    Reply
    • Grizalt

      6 years ago

      Did you watch his starts? The first inning was the one that gave him the most trouble. I doubt whether only seeing him once would make a difference.

      Reply
  12. lowtalker1

    6 years ago

    #Wetfloor
    It’s baseball time!

    Reply
  13. User 355748524

    6 years ago

    Padres are like a pitching prospect.

    Talented player, but stuff is raw and wind-up has a lot of moving parts. Tears through lineups when all his pitches are working though the switch can easily be flipped due to spotty control. Full season of work in the big leagues this year will depend on how well the stuff plays and how often it is executed properly, as opposed to when it doesn’t meet the strike zone.

    1
    Reply
  14. groundhog5150

    6 years ago

    Romper Room just got a little more crowded.

    Reply
  15. teddyjackeddy

    6 years ago

    Padre fans , always entertaining.

    Reply
  16. nutznboltz

    6 years ago

    Crap! I am going Saturday and really wanted to see Paddack. Now I have to see Margevicious.

    Reply
    • petersdylan36

      6 years ago

      I’m sorry! I love Saturday games at 5:40 but I waited until they announced when Paddack was pitching to buy tickets.
      Super excited for the season.
      Representing from Temecula.
      Go Padres

      Reply
  17. SDDon

    6 years ago

    Allen and Quantrill were given a chance to sieze that last rotation spot and they both failed. Next up was Nick Visious, he was thought to get a start in ST to expose him to the Show, then send him down. He looked solid all spring long. The bottom line us he earned the shot. He will surprise many average baseball fans but is an example of just how deep our farm system is. AVILLA is next up, IMO.

    Reply
    • SDHotDawg

      6 years ago

      He never pitched above A ball. 12 Spring Training innings and you’re ready to hand him a rotation spot? Nah. I want him to succeed, but I don’t think he’s anywhere near ready. Hopefully, he makes me eat my words.

      Reply
      • Grizalt

        6 years ago

        Agree for the most part but if not him, who?

        Reply
        • SDHotDawg

          6 years ago

          You’re saying we have no other starting pitchers above A ball in the organization. Not biting on that bait.

          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          No, I’m asking who you think should have gotten the fifth rotation spot.

          Reply
        • SDHotDawg

          6 years ago

          No, you’re dive bombing into the world of fallacy, because one has nothing to with the other.

          Remember this: “If we fire Bud Black, who’s going to replace him?”

          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          How do they have nothing to do with each other? Unless you like running a four man rotation or bullpenning every fifth day?

          Reply
        • SDHotDawg

          6 years ago

          Logic. You are essentially arguing that Margevicius is the only possible choice. He’s not.

          Reply
        • Grizalt

          6 years ago

          I would have gone with Mitchell or Erlin but the FO didn’t want to do that. I wanted to get an extended look at Jacob Nix this season but now he needs Tommy John. And Allen and Quantrill aren’t ready.

          Then despite Preller being incessantly linked to guys like Kluber, Bauer and Thor during the offseason, neither side seemed willing to budge on their bid/ask. Now that the season has started I don’t see them being traded for anything.

          Reply
        • SDHotDawg

          6 years ago

          There are/were some pretty good pitchers who signed minor league deals.

          I would have gone with Erlin. Mitchell is where he belongs. Of course, he will probably go unclaimed and return to soil our mound in the future, but …

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    The Astros Are (Again) Not Getting Much From A Pricey First Base Signing

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    Royals Outright Thomas Hatch

    Diamondbacks Place Kendall Graveman On 15-Day IL

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Guardians’ Will Brennan, Andrew Walters Undergo Season-Ending Surgeries

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Nats Notes: Nuñez, Chapparo, Williams

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version