Headlines

  • Astros To Sign Jake Odorizzi
  • Brewers To Sign Jackie Bradley Jr.
  • Surgery Recommended For Framber Valdez
  • No Planned Future Discussion On Expanded Playoffs, Universal DH In 2021
  • Out Of Options 2021
  • Royals, Hunter Dozier Agree To Four-Year Extension
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Giants Rumors: Sogard, Watson, Cardinals

By Connor Byrne | July 26, 2019 at 10:18pm CDT

The Giants’ surge up the standings this month has turned them from surefire trade deadline sellers to potential buyers. To that end, the Giants have “inquired” about Blue Jays infielder Eric Sogard, Jon Morosi of MLB.com tweets.

Considering the 33-year-old Sogard is a pending free agent, acquiring him would be a win-now move by the Giants, who have climbed to 52-51 and within 3 1/2 of a wild-card spot. Sogard is primarily a second baseman – a position that has that has been problematic this season for San Francisco. Main Giants option Joe Panik has struggled to a .235/.309/.317 line with a 69 wRC+ and three home runs over 369 plate appearances. Sogard, meanwhile, has slashed a far superior .299/.363/.480 (124 wRC+) with 10 HRs in 317 trips to the plate.

As MLBTR’s Jeff Todd explained a couple weeks ago, Sogard’s production doesn’t look sustainable – especially factoring in that he has seldom approached it over a career consisting of 2,000-plus trips to the plate. Nevertheless, Sogard’s 2019 offensive output, defensive versatility and league-minimum salary should make it easy to for rebuilding Toronto to find a taker in the next few days.

Whether the Giants should buy Sogard or anyone else is up for debate, depending on how much you’re convinced of their sudden brilliance. If the club goes the other way by the 31st, it still has several useful trade chips it could unload, including reliever Tony Watson. The Cardinals, who are seeking another left-hander for their bullpen, have done their “due diligence” on Watson, according to Mark Saxon of The Athletic. However, the Redbirds are leery of the escalator clauses in his contract, per Saxon.

Watson’s current salary has skyrocketed from a guaranteed $3.5MM to $8.5MM with the help of incentives, and it could increase to $10.5MM if he accrues 50 appearances. That seems inevitable for the 34-year-old, who has already piled up 44 this season. Along the way, the typically reliable Watson has thrown 41 innings and pitched to a 2.85 ERA (with a much less dominant 4.20 FIP) while posting 6.8 K/9, 1.1 BB/9 and a 46.9 percent groundball rate.

Regardless of whether Watson finishes the season in San Francisco or elsewhere, a trip to free agency looks probable for the winter. Watson’s pact features a $2.5MM club option for 2020, though it’s likely he’ll turn that down in favor of  a $500K buyout. Meantime, it’s iffy at best the Giants will trade Watson, let alone to a wild card-leading Cardinals team they’re trying to chase down.

Share 0 Retweet 3 Send via email0

Eric Sogard San Francisco Giants St. Louis Cardinals Tony Watson Toronto Blue Jays

Latest On Marlins’ Trevor Richards
Main
Gio Gonzalez Exits With Shoulder Tightness
40 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. missjill2u

    2 years ago

    Problems w Panik at 2nd, yes. But Solano is great and no mention of him? We should be starting him over Joe

    1 Like
    Reply
    • DougieJones

      2 years ago

      flipping their roles would be incredibly helpful

      Like
      Reply
  2. wesstl

    2 years ago

    No on Watson.

    Like
    Reply
  3. natelowda2

    2 years ago

    they are chasing the Chicago cubs who are a wild card-leading team.

    2 Like
    Reply
    • jshap219

      2 years ago

      I see what you did there. Go birds

      2 Like
      Reply
  4. antibelt

    2 years ago

    Solano has a more sketchy track regard than Sogard. Don’t want him of it’s going to require anyone on our top 30 prospects list. I don’t think his play will work in SF.

    Like
    Reply
    • Uncle Charlie

      2 years ago

      Solano is already on the Giants. Trading Watson for Sogard is ludicrous. A top line reliever for a 33 year old rental? Farhan isn’t that stupid.

      Like
      Reply
  5. The Call Up

    2 years ago

    Wild Card leading Cardinals? Last time I checked the standings, they were the NL Central leading Cardinals.

    3 Like
    Reply
  6. lwalsh29

    2 years ago

    How can Watson turn down a club option? That’s the club’s decision, not the players.

    1 Like
    Reply
    • tad2b13

      2 years ago

      Yeah, I was wondering about that too. Then I checked BB Ref which has it as a player’s option, not a club option.

      1 Like
      Reply
  7. aussiegiants53

    2 years ago

    Not keen on Sogard, if they want him just sign him in the off season, he’s not going to be the piece that fuels the Giants the rest of the way.

    1 Like
    Reply
    • JDGoat

      2 years ago

      No. But he may be a win or two better when compared to Panik. That’s could be huge down the stretch. And it’s only going to cost a lottery ticket type prospect deep in your system.

      Like
      Reply
      • Uncle Charlie

        2 years ago

        Solano = Sogard and he’s already on the Giants.

        Like
        Reply
  8. bigcheesegrilledontoast

    2 years ago

    Yeah I don’t think a trade will happen between Cards and Giants. Cardinals should have made something happen 3 weeks ago. Should be talking to KC. Matheny owes the Cards a few favours.

    Like
    Reply
    • BasesLoaded

      2 years ago

      In all honesty they should have made it during the winter. They were asking about both Smith and Watson, but didn’t want to pay the price. Boston is in the same boat. So is everyone else wanting Bumgarner. Apparently the Giants were looking to trade Bum in May and everyone was lowballing them so they decided to stay put.

      Like
      Reply
  9. deputy

    2 years ago

    Why Do the Giants seem to always be interested to take on other Peoples Problems in making a Trade?For the Last Couple of Years they always tend to sign Players that are over the hill! It is high time they sign they should sign People that are Young and have Potential to Produce Runs and Hits For Years To Come!!!!!

    Like
    Reply
    • sacball

      2 years ago

      when was the last time they “signed” someone over the hill?

      Like
      Reply
      • Pete'sView

        2 years ago

        Longoria. (Well, that was a trade, but a really bad one.) The point is not to take on aging, ineffectual players. Sograd fits that description, no matter what he’s done this year.

        Like
        Reply
        • claude raymond

          2 years ago

          Right. Minor league contract for a 2 month portion then s free agent. That description?

          Like
          Reply
        • Baytown

          2 years ago

          He’s a free agent after the year. His age has no bearing, just his performance now.

          Like
          Reply
  10. WereAllJustGuestsHere

    2 years ago

    Perhaps a better idea; Blue Jays are looking at the Yankees with a potential Stroman trade. Yanks may deal Frazier. Because the Blue Jays have an influx of OFs, perhaps the Jays and the Giants can help one another.

    Jays deal Freddie Galvis and Randal Grichuk to San Fran. Giants deal Brandon Crawford and a prospect.

    1 Like
    Reply
    • Pete'sView

      2 years ago

      Nice idea, but unlikely. No one’s taking on Crawford—certainly not Toronto—and the Giants won ‘t/can’t trade Crawford because he’s a fan favorite AND has a no-trade clause. Plus Toronto would be overpaying in your scenario.

      1 Like
      Reply
    • claude raymond

      2 years ago

      When does defense become non-essential? Trade that defense? Check out his offense in July. I’ll bet, wereall without an apostrophe, that Farman has every intention of trying to move Crawford. Jeez

      Like
      Reply
      • claude raymond

        2 years ago

        *Farhan

        Like
        Reply
      • WereAllJustGuestsHere

        2 years ago

        If you checked your numbers Freddie Galvis has been an upgrade defensively over Crawford. Brandon’s defense has taken a step back. Galvis would be an upgrade offensively also.

        I understand you like to attack and criticize many posters on this site. Please come with a real argument. It would help make your point.

        Like
        Reply
        • claude raymond

          2 years ago

          I “attack” people for having lousy suggestions. I also commend people with good suggestions. Yours, trading Crawford is a bad suggestion and has 0% chance of happening. And you’re we’re, not were.

          Like
          Reply
  11. troll

    2 years ago

    watson could hit the 50 games, just in st. louis

    Like
    Reply
  12. Pickle_Britches

    2 years ago

    Sogard is trash. I’ll be pissed if they get him. They don’t need him at all and he definitely isn’t worth any of our young prospects

    1 Like
    Reply
  13. Pickle_Britches

    2 years ago

    I’d be ok with Steven Duggar for sogard swap. But not any of the young up and coming prospects.

    Like
    Reply
    • Pete'sView

      2 years ago

      That’s a horrible deal. Sogard is an established poor hitter. Duggar may have some upside. Giants would never do that.

      Like
      Reply
      • Pickle_Britches

        2 years ago

        Duggar is not a good hitting everyday outfielder. He’s a pillar with less pop. The Giants have a lot of outfield prospects they could get rid of Duggar who is a 4th outfielder anyway. Trust me I hope they don’t get him and I hope they don’t give up canario, labour, matos, Ramos, pomares, torbino, etc.. I be happy with Solano and panik. Sogard isn’t the key to Giants being a playoff team.

        Like
        Reply
  14. Pete'sView

    2 years ago

    The Giants should be sellers, and certainly NOT give up anything for Sograd, a lifetime .247 hitter (mostly thanks to this year’s outlier season). Even with Panik’s poor average and low OBP, he’s still a reliable contact hitter with a great glove.

    1 Like
    Reply
    • Forebill

      2 years ago

      I disagree with this idea that the Giants should sell. It’s based upon the idea that this “surge” started in July. It actually began on May 30, the day they broke a 7 game losing streak. However, I’ve been tracking it since mid-June. Since June 1 they have a .670 WP. The pythagorean WP is .600 over that time. (That has fallen in the last week, but they faced the Mets and Cubs pitching at home over that week.) They have a positive 47 run diff over that time.

      If there wasn’t anything that could explain this I’d be dubious. But they have added 3 outfielders in that time who have improved the production from the corners in that period.

      Going forward, they have adequate rotation combined with a shutdown pen. That is a proven commodity in October.

      It’s still a question if they can make it to October, I freely admit that. But it does give them leverage. They are a large payroll team so selling at a discount to shave payroll isnt a motive. So the deals have to be good. Now that they are winning, that just became even more true.

      Like
      Reply
  15. Baytown

    2 years ago

    Interesting side note would be reuniting Pillar and Sogard. Have to believe that would be an emotional boost. Sogard gets out of the cellar, Kevin gets a buddy.
    Bochy would platoon putting Panik in when late innings roll around and team ahead for obvious reasons.

    Like
    Reply
  16. eatonculo

    2 years ago

    The money is irrelevant for any two-month rental.

    Like
    Reply
  17. Shastafan

    2 years ago

    Giants farm just took a mighty leap in the right direction, not likely Farhan wastes that effort on washed up or ineffective players.

    Like
    Reply
  18. Forebill

    2 years ago

    The Giants are a large payroll team so selling just to shave payroll was never a huge motive. So, there were never going to be discount trades in the first place regardless of record. But now that they are playing well they have much more leverage. They also have the fanbase engaged again.

    If the Yankees start feeling the heat they may give up enough for MadBum and I believe Farhan would make the deal. The Cardinals and Dodgers would also have to pay dearly for a bullpen arm.

    Sogard isnt worth a big time prospect. Since MadBum and Smith are still Giants at this moment it seems Farhan gets that.

    1 Like
    Reply
  19. Nuschler

    2 years ago

    No way Sogard is an upgrade over Panik. Panik and Crawford are the best double play combo in baseball and Panik is bound to start hitting soon plus Solano and Panik already are a solid platoon (albeit Panik clearly has not held up his part of the bargain with his bat but he does already have more extra base hits and walks than last year).

    Like
    Reply
    • Forebill

      2 years ago

      Panik hasn’t hit in over a year and his defense has been spotty.

      Like
      Reply
  20. WarrenSpahn

    2 years ago

    Sogard would be a typical rental for the Gints: an over-the-hill, has-been, never-was 33 year old without much record of success. Taking playing time away from a prospect.

    Brilliant!

    Like
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Astros To Sign Jake Odorizzi

    Brewers To Sign Jackie Bradley Jr.

    Surgery Recommended For Framber Valdez

    No Planned Future Discussion On Expanded Playoffs, Universal DH In 2021

    Out Of Options 2021

    Royals, Hunter Dozier Agree To Four-Year Extension

    Giants, Scott Kazmir Agree To Minor League Deal

    Kelvin Herrera Announces Retirement

    Braves Extend Brian Snitker

    Yankees Sign Justin Wilson

    Recent

    Quick Hits: Cishek, Souza, Herrera

    COVID Notes: 3/6/21

    Latest On Framber Valdez

    Jarred Kelenic To Miss Time After Suffering Knee Strain

    MLBTR Poll: Should The Twins Extend Byron Buxton?

    Injury Notes: Longoria, Urias, Whitley

    Pitching Notes: Payamps, Mata, Osuna

    Padres Claim Jordan Humphreys From Giants

    Giants, José Álvarez Nearing Deal

    Market For Maikel Franco “Heating Up”

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Kris Bryant Rumors
    • Jackie Bradley Jr. Rumors
    • Jake Odorizzi Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version