Headlines

  • Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez
  • Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff
  • Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Bobby Jenks Passes Away
  • Braves Release Alex Verdugo
  • Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Digging Into The Cubs’ Looming Decision On David Phelps

By Steve Adams | September 13, 2019 at 8:57am CDT

When David Phelps signed with the Blue Jays this past offseason, his $2.5MM contract contained a club option for the 2020 season initially that was valued at $1MM — a likely reflection of the fact that his performance and general health were question marks coming off Tommy John surgery. Unsurprisingly, the contract allowed for him to boost the value of that option with a solid showing in 2019.

Activated from the IL on June 17 and traded to the Cubs on July 30, Phelps has been terrific for both teams, working to a combined 3.18 ERA with a 30-to-12 K/BB ratio in 28 1/3 innings (33 appearances). When he took the mound for the 30th time in 2019, he boosted the value of his 2020 option from that initial $1MM baseline to $3MM. He’s also already earned $500K of incentives and will earn another $250K when he makes his 35th appearance. If Phelps takes the ball seven more times before the end of the regular season, he’ll again boost the value of his option, this time to $5MM, and secure another $350K bonus.

The level at which his 2020 option settles is of particular intrigue because that will also determine the amount of incentives available to him next year. Phelps’ contract came with three different possible tiers of incentives, each of which was based on the option’s ultimate value. MLBTR has learned some of the specifics surrounding those incentive packages. If his option is valued at $3MM (i.e. he appears in 39 or fewer total games), Phelps would be able to earn an additional $2.75MM in appearance-based bonuses: $250K for reaching 25, 30 and 35 games as well as $400K for reaching 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60 games.

Were he to reach that 40-appearance threshold in 2019 and boost the value of the option to $5MM, he’d be able to earn an additional $1.5MM in appearance-based bonuses: $150K for reaching 25, 30 and 35 games as well as $210K for reaching 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60 games. Both tiers contain added incentives for games finished, but the Cubs’ signing of Craig Kimbrel doesn’t bode well for Phelps’ chances of an extended run as the team’s closer.

All of those factors will be weighed by the Cubs when they determine whether to bring Phelps back for the 2020 season, as will the fact that they stand to see a large chunk of their ’pen depart via free agency. Brandon Kintzler, Pedro Strop, Steve Cishek, Derek Holland, Xavier Cedeno, Tony Barnette and Brandon Morrow (who didn’t throw a pitch in 2019) are all off the books at season’s end.

From a pure performance standpoint, Phelps has improved as the season has worn on. His fastball averaged 92.1 mph with the Jays but is up to 92.8 mph with the Cubs. That’s still less than the 94.4 mph he averaged prior to Tommy John surgery, but the life on that heater does seem to be coming back. Phelps also managed just a 5.4 percent swinging-strike rate in Toronto but has seen that rate leap to 11.1 percent in Chicago — a rate that would represent a career-high. He’s also benefited from a sky-high 98.6 percent strand rate with the Cubs, though, which no pitcher can be expected sustain over a larger body of work. Phelps has held righties in check nicely (.232/.311/.377) but struggled against opposing lefties (.263/.349/.553).

Phelps’ usage over the regular season’s final couple of weeks will be worth monitoring, as it may ultimately play a large role in determining whether he’s back with the team in 2020 or searching for a new deal in free agency this winter. Neither the $3MM or $5MM price point is any sort of back-breaker, particularly with a fair bit of money coming off the books. But the Cubs also likely want to maintain as much flexibility as they can, and tacking on an extra $2MM to Phelps’ option is probably something they’d like to avoid, if possible, unless they’re planning to decline the option either way. There’s no buyout on the option, so this’ll be a straight $3MM or $5MM decision, depending on how many more times Phelps takes the ball prior to Sept. 29.

Share 0 Retweet 7 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs MLBTR Originals David Phelps

Yankees Notes: Sanchez, Happ
Main
Boras Corp. Amateur Department Research Job Opening
View Comments (36)
Post a Comment

36 Comments

  1. rayrayner

    6 years ago

    I doubt he makes seven appearances. The Cubs have 13 relief pitchers. Some for high leverage. Some for just garbage time. Phelps has fallen in between. I would think that he would have to hope for close games where the starters don’t make five innings. Or a game 163.

    Reply
    • joshua.barron1

      6 years ago

      Game 163… I love it!

      1
      Reply
      • rayrayner

        6 years ago

        Yeah, haven’t you heard? Versus the Cards on Sept.30 for the NL Central. The Cubs won’t mind staying an extra day.

        Reply
        • chitown311

          6 years ago

          That team will be planning their golf destinations by sep 25!!!!?

          Reply
        • ChiSoxCity

          6 years ago

          Considering how they’ve been playing, they probably started planning their offseason in June.

          Reply
        • rondon

          6 years ago

          But then how will you express your desperate need for attention!!!!?

          Reply
  2. brodie-bruce

    6 years ago

    with him being one of the few bright spots in an already bad pen and a lot of its departing after this season for 5 mil can really afford to let him go?

    Reply
    • rayrayner

      6 years ago

      It’s not a bad pen. It just lacks the lights out closer, but the Cubs are locked into Kimbrel now. $3 million is a no-brainer option pickup. $5 million is a tough call, probably a no.

      1
      Reply
      • stan lee the manly

        6 years ago

        I think you are about the only fan in baseball that doesn’t think this pen is a disaster. They are absolutely not missing just one piece, I chuckled at this one.

        Reply
  3. Robertowannabe

    6 years ago

    Actually not boding well for Kimbrel to be the teams closer. Has not put up good numbers and has not been healthy. If Kimbrel does not return to form by the end of the Cubs season, The Cubs may well be forced to keep Phelps no matter his cost with him being such a bright spot in the pen.

    Reply
    • avschamps1

      6 years ago

      Typically I would agree with you on Kimbrel, but I would hope that a full offseason and then a full workout would eliminate a lot of the ‘nagging’ injuries – the reason is while we were all told he was still working out during his lay off, we also in reality know that the type of ‘workout’ he was doing is nothing like a regular in season / off season workout plan. I look for Kimbrel to come back next year and be MUCH better – maybe not the dominate one we saw of him in the past but way better than he has been this year for us.

      1
      Reply
      • chitown311

        6 years ago

        Or maybe he’s another older washed up closer that 99% of the “elite” closers turn into once they are in their 30’s. Kimbrel being 32 next season does not bode well for anyone expecting great seasons from here on out.

        Reply
  4. Dogbone

    6 years ago

    I think the Cubs definitely will pick up Phelps contract at either price. The bigger question will be Kinzler. Both of them along with Kimbrel and Rowan Wick, and Kyle Ryan and Danny Hultzen – make up a good pen at a fair price. They also have a number of decent arms to shuttle between Iowa and Wrigley, as situations arise.

    1
    Reply
    • mike127

      6 years ago

      That shuttle between Iowa and Wrigley is one of the reasons the Cubs are in the position they are in. Just like football “you have three quarterbacks that means you really don’t have one”…same here….”when you have 14 arms, you don’t have the four or five you really need.”

      Reply
      • Dogbone

        6 years ago

        I don’t agree with what, you see as the ‘problem ‘. To me, the bigger problem was the first half of the season. Morrow was being counted on, and he wasn’t healthy. Kimbrel wasn’t signed yet. Wick and Ryan either were not up yet, or unknown quantities. Strop was being counted on, and failed miserably.
        The Cubs pen was vastly improved as the year went on, but that is assuming Kimbrels arm is relatively healthy. The addition of Phelps was a solid pick up at the deadline.

        Reply
  5. mike127

    6 years ago

    I’m pretty sure that this is not a “looming decision” that the front office is losing sleep over right now, with 15 games to play. Nice filler on a Friday morning, but something to be discussed October 1st or sometime near after.

    1
    Reply
    • Steve Adams

      6 years ago

      Sure, it’s not a priority for them right now — but “looming decision” isn’t intended to convey urgency. It is something they’ll need to consider, though, and the fact that his usage over the final two weeks impacts his price tag adds some immediate relevance.

      As for Friday morning filler — well, yeah! There’s not exactly a ton of hard news or transactions kicking around, haha, so why not dig up some contract details and present a semi-interesting option scenario that hasn’t been widely discussed or noticed?

      3
      Reply
      • mike127

        6 years ago

        Sorry Steve,I just took the headline took literal. But—-“looming” did grab my eye and I did read it with a little more awareness than I may have.

        Reply
      • Robertowannabe

        6 years ago

        Yes, the usage is what is looming and they have to basically decide how sure they are in bringing him back under the option. If they decide that they will decline the option no matter what they can use them all they want. If they think they may want to keep him, they have to decide how they will use him considering they still need to win regular season games right now.

        Reply
      • chitown311

        6 years ago

        Don’t worry about these Dummy Cubby fans Steve. They’re just kinda salty and bitter right now that a $230 million payroll and a “can’t miss core dynasty” has floundered in to the overpaid overpriced hyped that they were deemed 3 years ago

        2
        Reply
        • Steve Adams

          6 years ago

          Honest question: why do you feel the need to troll every single Cubs post and Cubs comment? Looking through your history, it seems that’s like 80% of your comments here. Enough already, man. Find a more meaningful way to contribute to threads or we’ll just start deleting your comments. It’s a tired freaking act.

          I recognize that you’re not the only one trolling a certain team, but if you’re going to reply to a direct comment made by me while mocking one whole team’s fan-base, you’re kind of asking for it.

          Find something better to do with your time.

          9
          Reply
        • chitown311

          6 years ago

          Sorry. Go cubbies and go Sox!

          Reply
        • mike127

          6 years ago

          Steve, thank you!! It is refreshing that MLBTR continues to allow fans to voice comments while other outlets have flatout cut them off because they had become troll fest.

          I wasn’t trying to be a dummy Cub fan earlier and already apologized for taking the headline a little too literal.

          That being said, I have been a Cubs season ticket holder for longer than most of your audience have been alive and can easily say that I have seen them lose over 4,000 times. I have no room for any negativity during this five year run.

          As a STH I have been in a number of forums, etc with Theo and Jed and never once did they mention a dynasty, and to the contrary laid out that every year is sacred and never once promised a championship. The ultimate goal, as relayed at these meetings, was to play meaningful baseball games in September and October for extended period of time.

          One of the Cubs management and front office faults is that they are so accessible and transparent. Every day they are on the radio, TV and do not shy away from speaking. With that comes greater expectations because their goals are right in front of fans who live and die on every game. It’s amazing how good they are and keep emotion out of their daily routine. As this is such a rabid fan based that waited “forever” to experience a World Series, the scrutiny heightens by the day when things aren’t like 2016. It’s just not feasible.

          Again, thanks to MLBTR for having a forum—-you can simply turn it all off like ESPN, CBS, so many others have.

          1
          Reply
        • rondon

          6 years ago

          Boy, Steve was that overdue! Thank you!

          Reply
      • jorge78

        6 years ago

        Great “filler” Steve! Very interesting!

        Reply
  6. riffraff

    6 years ago

    No way do the cubs pick up his option – they decline the option, sign him to 3yrs $13MM with incentives then he will go for TJ surgery in late June.

    Reply
  7. its_happening

    6 years ago

    Pick up the option, trade him back to the Jays with Ian Happ and (maybe) a minor leaguer for Giles.

    Reply
  8. Bill walsh

    6 years ago

    So the Cubs have spent 140 million on pitching counting the chumps who left and the guys in minored.
    This is more than was spent by the other 4 teams in division combined.
    Become G M
    Suck for 5 years while raising prices.
    Barely beat Indian team devastated by injury
    And hire old over paid guys.
    This is hat killed Ep Hoyer in Boston.
    Still 75 million left on Heyward, 38 million on Kimbrel, ……? On Darvish,

    1
    Reply
    • Dogbone

      6 years ago

      At least do a little homework and get your numbers accurate before you post. I don’t disagree with your premise though.

      2
      Reply
    • chitown311

      6 years ago

      4 years and $81 million left on Yu Garbish contract lol

      Reply
      • ddevonb

        6 years ago

        And Darvish is pitching great.

        Reply
      • rondon

        6 years ago

        chitown… It’s gonna be great to see your desperate cries for attention disappear.

        Reply
  9. gregstruth89

    6 years ago

    Cubs lock him up 5yrs 50mil. They overpay for everything and then there arm falls off. Go cubbies

    Reply
  10. Fred K. Burke

    6 years ago

    Just to add some humor. Maybe the Cubs sign both RP Kyle Crick and OF Yasiel Puig this off season. Then we can get some real entertainment on this Cubs team.

    Reply
  11. ddevonb

    6 years ago

    If they need him to cross these thresholds to get to the postseason, they will not keep him from pitching.

    Reply
  12. greatd

    6 years ago

    Wonder why the Cubs bother having Descalso and his sub .200 average around.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib

    Tucker Barnhart To Retire

    Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline

    Reds Release Jeimer Candelario

    Dave Parker Passes Away

    Griffin Canning Diagnosed With Ruptured Achilles

    Recent

    Nationals Sign Luis Garcia

    Cubs, Tigers Among Teams Interested In Ke’Bryan Hayes

    AL Central Notes: Thomas, Ragans, Lynch, Cobb

    Padres To Activate Yu Darvish On Monday

    Rhys Hoskins Suffers Grade 2 Thumb Sprain, Headed To IL

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Rays Sign Peter Strzelecki To Minor League Contract

    MLB Announces 2025 All-Star Rosters

    Pirates Re-Sign Yohan Ramírez, Release Peter Strzelecki

    Diamondbacks Place Pavin Smith On IL, Select Tristin English

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version