Headlines

  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

New Dodgers TV Deal Announced

By Jeff Todd | April 1, 2020 at 12:09pm CDT

While the 2020 season remains paused, many Dodgers fans can now at least look forward to catching their team in action when MLB resumes play. An agreement has at long last been reached that will bring Dodgers games back to many televisions in Southern California, as Ramona Shelburne of ESPN reports (Twitter link) and has now been announced.

The 2013 creation of the Spectrum SportsNet LA network — jointly owned by the Dodgers and Charter Communications — promised more content, but came with a catch. Carriage fees agreements were not forthcoming between SportsNet LA and TV providers such as Direct TV and Dish Network. That left an effective blackout for large swaths of the market.

Now, SportsNet LA has a deal in place with AT&T to carry Dodgers games on Direct TV and other AT&T-owned outlets. Other major providers still don’t have deals in place with SportsNet LA, so the situation hasn’t yet improved for all fans. But many will now be able to watch games as before. And perhaps this agreement is cause for optimism that bargains can be struck with the other providers as well.

The timing is obviously interesting, with the Dodgers staring at a major loss of revenue in 2020. With an increasing likelihood that MLB will stage contests without fans for at least part of a truncated season, it’s all the more important for the team to deliver its media content to fans. Whether the coronavirus pandemic specifically prompted this agreement isn’t known. No doubt we’ll learn more as further details emerge.

Share 0 Retweet 14 Send via email0

Los Angeles Dodgers

Prospect Faceoff: Gore v. Luzardo
Main
GM Trade History: Blue Jays’ Ross Atkins
View Comments (61)
Post a Comment

61 Comments

  1. Thronson5

    5 years ago

    About damn time!

    2
    Reply
  2. puigpower

    5 years ago

    Something good comes out of this. Happy for those that have missed out, time to unsubscribe your VPNs and all the illegal stuff you’ve paid for LOL

    1
    Reply
    • Vizionaire

      5 years ago

      there are still mlb tv blackouts to bypass.

      1
      Reply
      • atuck_sfg

        5 years ago

        Heard the mlb is working on that with mlbtv as well

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          5 years ago

          That’s a tough one. In-market broadcasting rights are owned by companies that paid a lot of money for them.

          Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      5 years ago

      I pay for MLBtv every year but I still need my VPN and illegal streams for local games. That and foreign Netflix content.

      Reply
  3. brocnessmonster

    5 years ago

    Haha too late we all had to figure out how to stream them illegally and now we’re never going back

    3
    Reply
    • whynot 2

      5 years ago

      You sound rather proud of stealing… that’s an interesting thing to be proud about

      Reply
      • ateam043

        5 years ago

        I don’t know about stealing…the vast majority of us signed up for MLB TV and then use VPN to go around the restrictions. So we paid for the services.

        1
        Reply
        • whynot 2

          5 years ago

          When you acknowledge your are illegally accessing something, you are acknowledging you are not paying for it, that is stealing.

          Reply
      • The Human Rain Delay

        5 years ago

        Very proud…. I was a willing and able customer ,and they screwed us bad- Yes it feels good to watch my Dodgers and I will continue to stream them for free as a snub to them for being jerks for so many years- Whats your take? Run back with open arms and thank them?

        What a terrible take

        2
        Reply
        • whynot 2

          5 years ago

          My take is you pay for things/services you make use of, not a complicated concept

          Reply
        • The Human Rain Delay

          5 years ago

          And whats your stance on the avg Los Angeles area fan not being able to see their team play for years on the television despite paying for Mlb package at a pretty penny?

          Reply
        • whynot 2

          5 years ago

          I honestly don’t know enough about the situation to have an educated opinion.

          Reply
    • Bleedsblue81

      5 years ago

      They steal Dodger games from us, we steal dodger games from them.

      3
      Reply
      • The Human Rain Delay

        5 years ago

        Amen brotha

        1
        Reply
      • fox471 Dave

        5 years ago

        WOW! How 21st century. Theft is ok because…. well, just because.

        Reply
  4. darkstar61

    5 years ago

    Better situation? Yes

    Good situation? No!

    If the MLB is honestly interested in expanding the fanbase, work out deals to run all the Dodgers and Angels games locally like they used to on KTLA and KCAL. Give the fans easy access to the games!

    These cable deals, while injecting short term money, are destroying the longterm viability of the sport. People have to search out a way to watch the sport, and often have to spend additional money, instead of having the game thrust into everyones home on a near daily basis. Its shrinking the fanbase of the game

    2
    Reply
    • Senioreditor

      5 years ago

      Attendance is down 10% from the peak but revenue and TV viewership are up drastically. MLB will be fine.

      Reply
      • darkstar61

        5 years ago

        TV ratings are not up much. They’ve maybe gone up a little from recent low points, but they are down dramatically from a decade or two ago.

        The impact can be seen most strikingly in the numbers for the World Series. The last 10 years have seen the only times in history those numbers have dropped under 15 million mark, and it has been under 15 million in 7 of those last 10 years!

        The Allstar game is seeing similar, where an average of 22 million viewers to end the 90s, and numbers never falling under 12 million prior to 2005, have now shrunk to numbers as low as 8-9 million recently, with each year seeing a new low

        So as the population of the country grows, we are seeing fewer and fewer people watching the game; be it in person or on tv. That includes even its biggest stages in staggering numbers

        And worse yet, it is the youth demographic that especially has disappeared from the viewership, meaning growth can not be expected moving forward. We are losing entire generations of fans for the future

        It is not surprising though, when those youth are not growing up on the game because the game is not accessible to them – it’s behind paywalls, where only existing fans with money to burn are searching it out to watch

        Reply
        • The Human Rain Delay

          5 years ago

          Great Take darkstar

          Reply
        • bruceperdew

          5 years ago

          Thats because more and more people are moving away from Cable TV. Those TV ratings are not including streaming from other platforms, which the younger generation has moved to. People have way more options to watch Baseball now than they had 10 years ago.

          Reply
        • darkstar61

          5 years ago

          Thank you

          But the change really can not be understated, and it can be spotted in aspects other than just viewership.

          Look at video games. At their peak from 1997-1998, there were 24 baseball video games released. 24! Think of how popular a sport has to be to sustain 12 video games a year.

          Now? There are just 2 each year, with one being available exclusively on the playstation platform.

          Kids especially just have very few ways to easily access the game, and the games popularity is plummeting because of it. The effects of it all will especially start hitting hard over the next 10-20 years, as older diehards continue to die off.

          Manfred obviously recognizes the issue too, and is desperate to try to correct it. Problem is, he is trying to address it in all the wrong ways. We need more accessibility, fast

          Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      5 years ago

      KYLA and KCAL never showed all the Dodger games. Never!

      Reply
      • darkstar61

        5 years ago

        I’m having hard time finding specific numbers, but yes, they used to air at least a third to half of the games. Considering there are 162 games, you are talking a ton of broadcasts each season. And with 2 teams in the market, there were few days where baseball was not on

        Reply
      • AngelDiceClay

        5 years ago

        The Dodgers were on KTLA in 2019. 5 home games bub.

        Reply
  5. dwightgoodenspinkynail

    5 years ago

    It’s crazy it took this long to get right. It’s past time to end all blackouts. People who want to watch in the market will find a way, legal or otherwise.

    1
    Reply
    • ChiSoxCity

      5 years ago

      Teams like the Dodgers are the problem. They’re too greedy to make sensible agreements on regional sports fees, hence the blackouts.

      Reply
      • Senioreditor

        5 years ago

        Sensible is in the eyes of the beholder. Who’s to say what is sensible? What the tv providers want to pay? Is that your definition of sensible?

        3
        Reply
        • jekporkins

          5 years ago

          Well, I would say anytime you blackout games to over 70% of your fan base is not sensible.

          Reply
        • GOP Lizards

          5 years ago

          Another tired jab at the west coast. Who was it that said, you are entitled to not just an opinion, but an informed opinion. .

          Reply
      • JustCheckingIn

        5 years ago

        Lmfao. Blame the team offered a multi billion dollar deal-

        not the company offered them all that many AND that refused to negotiate with the other companies unless it was on their terms AND did all the negotiating after closing the deal

        Yeah blame the dodgers. Sure you’d turn that check down too bud

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          5 years ago

          Got to keep in mind these providers are competitors. Cooperation doesn’t exactly come naturally. We don’t really know who refused to negotiate. All we know is at one point TWC made an offer to Direct at a lower cost and Direct turned it down. Since then they’d been pointing their fingers at each other, at least until AT&T bought Direct.

          Reply
      • ChiSoxCity

        5 years ago

        Use your noggin. The games aren’t widespread, despite high demand for viewers. That should tell you it’s the team not willing to negotiate or compromise. The Dodgers decided to go this route for a reason. More $$$$.

        Reply
        • Senioreditor

          5 years ago

          The team has no control over whether other carriers are willing to pay for a product. Ultimately ATT decided to pay enough to acquire the content. Others may or may not also agree to pony up. That’s how supply and demand works. It’s a 25 year contract. Cable providers were eventually going to cave.

          Reply
        • ChiSoxCity

          5 years ago

          Sorry, I don’t buy that. The Dodgers have a loyal fanbase. The fact that I ( a White Sox fan living in the northeast) can catch more Dodgers games than a local is just unacceptable. Supply and demand isn’t the issue. Teams have a responsibility to their fans and the municipalities they depend on for revenue.

          Reply
        • Senioreditor

          5 years ago

          Says who and let me assure you the Dodgers make plenty of money outside of LA County.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          5 years ago

          Nobody called it acceptable but what I think you don’t understand is that once a team sells their in-market broadcasting rights it’s up to the buyer of those rights to deal with the providers. The out of market rights belong to MLB.

          Reply
  6. 920kodiak

    5 years ago

    Memo to Orioles (especially) and Nationals. Fix the MASN deal.

    Reply
    • 8

      5 years ago

      No one watches the Nats but lots of people watch the O’s.

      Reply
      • 920kodiak

        5 years ago

        Not anymore.

        Reply
    • Don Awalt

      5 years ago

      I was going to add the same thing @920kodiak! No streaming options, and no local broadcast (other than national games) for the Orioles and Nats! Which means if you are an Orioles fan, well, let’s just say not many national games on these days lol. But I am still a fan! I get MASN on DirecTV, yet I can’t go upstairs and watch the game on my iPad! Our daughter and son in law are cord cutters, as many are – there is no way for them to even see an Orioles game. MLB won’t do anything as MASN owns the rights in most of the Mid Atlantic. How all this is destroying the game to make future fans when most under 35 can’t even watch a game! The Dodgers, Orioles and Nats are the only teams in this situation.

      1
      Reply
      • 8

        5 years ago

        Mlb TV has a streaming service with a 1 team package, if it’s not broadcasted on MASN you should get it on their. Also cut the cord u can get streaming for over half the price of DirecTV they are awful. Maybe wait two or three years since it’s the O’s, Better than the Tigers I guess.

        Reply
        • Don Awalt

          5 years ago

          MLB.TV has blackout rules, so living in the MASN-Orioles-Nationals territory, even though I subscribe to MLB.TV I can’t get the local team(s) (in this case Orioles/Nationals on any package, sadly. I would happily use MLB.TV every year if I could get Orioles games within local market. That’s what I meant above when I said MLB won’t broadcast as the rights are owned by MASN.

          Reply
  7. SoCalAngelsFan75

    5 years ago

    As a Spectrum customer and Angels fan that has no choice but to pay the SportsNet LA fee, does this mean my bill will go down a few bucks now because AT&T customers are going to help cover some of the cost of this network? I know the answer is no.

    Reply
  8. timyanks

    5 years ago

    that’s a lot of money to watch reruns

    Reply
  9. MWeller77

    5 years ago

    April Fool’s probably

    Reply
  10. BlueSkies_LA

    5 years ago

    If I remember the numbers right, Direct is about 30% of the LA media market. Added to the existing viewership of around 50% this should bring the total viewership for the Dodgers up to around 80%.

    Reply
  11. nachoman

    5 years ago

    Woohoo. I can finally dump spectrum and their crap tv service.

    Reply
  12. OCTraveler

    5 years ago

    Dam – I have Dish network! Still SOL!

    Reply
  13. tedtheodorelogan

    5 years ago

    Do they not have Comcast in LA?

    Reply
    • HalosHeavenJJ

      5 years ago

      they do but it isn’t very widespread.

      Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        5 years ago

        If I remember right TWC (now Spectrum) made a deal with Comcast to carry SportsNetLA a few years ago, but it didn’t have a lot of impact on viewership.

        Reply
  14. HalosHeavenJJ

    5 years ago

    Looks to me like they are really planning on playing without fans. Better to get some revenue, at least ad revenue, than no revenue.

    Reply
  15. brucenewton

    5 years ago

    They’ll pull that deal if baseball returns to normal next year. So the fans will likely never experience it.

    Reply
  16. The Human Rain Delay

    5 years ago

    Let me just roll my red mat out for them and welcome them back with open arms….

    Nah, ill just continue streaming them as a big F U for everything they have done to La Basin residents the past couple years

    Reply
  17. mgomrjsurf

    5 years ago

    Google Fiber in the future same with CCI.

    Reply
  18. aneternalenigma

    5 years ago

    All it took was a worldwide pandemic for this to get solved!

    Reply
  19. GOP Lizards

    5 years ago

    Clearly, this sad state of affairs shows how much Kasten et al value Dodger fans. Six years have gone by and many have missed enumerable historic moments as well as watching Kershaw in his prime. Not sure why Dodgers’ have gotten a pass here? Local radio failed to cover it much, perhaps due to pressure by on them by Dodger organization who pays for advertising? It has made it tough to be a Dodger fan. I really cannot blame those who were left to figure it out on their own. Shame on Kasten.

    Reply
  20. Billy Mumphreys Downfall

    5 years ago

    Lol direct tv is garbage ever since at&t bought them. Of course that’s the service they come to an agreement with

    Reply
  21. qturner

    5 years ago

    My old friend passed away from ALS in 2016. He had been a Dodger season ticket holder for decades. Being unable to travel to games, his only recourse was to follow games on TV and/or radio. Unfortunately, there were no televised. Dodger games. We talked about his lifelong love of Dodgers, but his feelings about the organization changed when he considered the way they treated their fans in LA area. He was a bit bitter. Being from the Bay Area, virtually all Giant games are televised on Comcast. It was hard for me to envision Dodger fans NOT being able to see games most nights like I could. Business and GREED fixed that. Well, things change. A new TV Contract has been reached . I’m writing this to my old friend, to simply say the Dodgers have finally get fixed the curse. Seven straight NL West Titles, but no World Series ring. Wasn’t that back in 1989? I’d say that is enough punishment for a lifetime. I’m hoping you’ve gone back to supporting the Bums up there, and wish them luck when play resumes. As a Giants fan I’m pretty satisfied with , but would love the Dodgers to finally win one for my old pard in my lifetime. Maybe this is the year. To Dan; let’s play ball. ⚾️

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    The Astros Are (Again) Not Getting Much From A Pricey First Base Signing

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    Royals Outright Thomas Hatch

    Diamondbacks Place Kendall Graveman On 15-Day IL

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Guardians’ Will Brennan, Andrew Walters Undergo Season-Ending Surgeries

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Nats Notes: Nuñez, Chapparo, Williams

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version