Headlines

  • Orioles Acquire Cole Irvin From A’s
  • Astros Name Dana Brown General Manager
  • Rays Extend Jeffrey Springs
  • Royals, Red Sox Swap Adalberto Mondesi For Josh Taylor
  • Red Sox Designate Matt Barnes For Assignment
  • Scott Rolen Elected Into Baseball Hall Of Fame
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 Free Agents
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Arbitration Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Don’t Issue Qualifying Offer To Clayton Kershaw

By Mark Polishuk | November 7, 2021 at 3:52pm CDT

As expected, the Dodgers officially announced that both Corey Seager and Chris Taylor will receive qualifying offers prior to today’s 4pm CT deadline.  However, Seager and Taylor were the only players mentioned, meaning that Clayton Kershaw will enter free agency without the qualifying offer attached to his services.

Kershaw, Taylor, and Seager were the only Dodger free agents who were both eligible for the QO (Max Scherzer and Kenley Jansen weren’t eligible, for the record) and seemed like candidates to be issued the one-year, $18.4MM deal.  Seager was obviously a no-brainer and Taylor also seemed like an increasingly obvious lock for the QO, but Kershaw’s case suddenly became much cloudier due to his season-ending forearm injury.  While Kershaw’s injury won’t require surgery and he expects to be ready for Spring Training, the issue certainly seems substantial enough for the Dodgers to have doubts about an $18.4MM commitment.

It isn’t a guarantee that Kershaw would have accepted a qualifying offer, but it would certainly seem like a possibility considering his injury-shortened 2021 campaign.  Elbow inflammation sidelined Kershaw for over two months, and his forearm problems then prevented him from taking part in the Dodgers’ postseason run.  Over 121 2/3 innings pitched, however, Kershaw still posted a 3.55 ERA with outstanding strikeout (29.5%) and walk (4.3%) rates.

The lack of a QO doesn’t necessarily spell the end of Kershaw’s run in a Dodgers uniform.  President of baseball operations Andrew Friedman has already said that the team will approach Kershaw’s trip to the open market in a different manner than they would a normal free agent, given Kershaw’s legendary status in Los Angeles.

Interpreted another way, however, it could be that the Dodgers are giving Kershaw a bit of leeway towards a potential departure by not extending a qualifying offer.  If Kershaw rejected a QO, his new team would have to give up a draft pick and potentially international bonus pool money to sign him, which could have hampered Kershaw’s market to some extent.

Now, the southpaw doesn’t have anything hindering his first-ever trip to free agency, which would at least slightly increase the chance that Kershaw’s Dodgers tenure could be up after 14 seasons.  There has been speculation that the Texas native might be interested in pitching closer to home, which would put the Astros and particularly the Rangers (Kershaw is from Dallas and lives in the area) on the radar as possible landing spots.

Share 0 Retweet 18 Send via email0

Los Angeles Dodgers Transactions Clayton Kershaw

Brewers Won’t Issue Qualifying Offer To Avisail Garcia
Main
Red Sox Extend Qualifying Offer To Eduardo Rodriguez
View Comments (106)

Comments

  1. TrillionaireTeamOperator

    1 year ago

    I still think if Kershaw keeps playing he will get at least 2 years/$55M if not 3 years/$94.5M.

    If Hyun Jin Ryu is worth $20M per season, Kershaw is still worth $27.5M or more per season.

    Kinda surprised the Dodgers and Kershaw haven’t just done a 2 year/$62M extension already.

    Reply
    • boknows

      1 year ago

      If the Dodgers didn’t issue him an $18.4M/1 year offer why are you surprised that they haven’t just done a 2 year/$62M extension… why would i team say “you’re not worth this for one year but you’re worth almost double this annual salary for multiple years” …….

      Reply
      • Darryl Rose

        1 year ago

        Math. Don’t assume others understand it.

        Reply
        • lady1959

          1 year ago

          Math. Can’t live with it. Can’t live without it ⚾️

      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 year ago

        Class move by the Dodgers, forfeiting a compensation pick to help Kershaw latch onto another team if they (Dodgers and Kershaw) can’t come to an agreement.

        Reply
        • WeggieJackson44

          1 year ago

          Sure…as if that why they did this…keep drinking the cool aid

        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          Wait, there’s Kool-Aid? Nobody told be there’d be Kool-Aid.

        • lady1959

          1 year ago

          Nope. Just cake ⚾️

        • need_a_no-no_pads

          1 year ago

          He wouldn’t have a draft pick attached, he already received a QO in the past.

        • Harwood

          1 year ago

          Kershaw has never received a QO. He’s never even been a free agent.

    • 2021 great year to be a Padres fan

      1 year ago

      No man. Because of Injury concerns alone, his value that You mention alone is for no Injury prone players. Same goes for verlander, or if strasburg would hit free agency. Or Even for syndengard so i think Noah takes the QO from mets. Kershaw is closer to 2 years 30-34 Mill

      Reply
    • dawg84

      1 year ago

      He won’t get 27 mil a year. Too fragile.

      Reply
    • The Mets "Missed WAR"

      1 year ago

      That doesn’t make any sense. If the Dodgers thought Kershaw was worth $27.5M a year they would have been willing to offer him the 1-year $18.4M QO. This means the Dodgers are not even willing to give him $18.4M a year, much less $27.5M. He could still get a multi-year deal but it will obviously have to be at a lower AAV than $18.4 unless he signs with another team. There is no way the Dodgers decline the QO and then offer him a higher AAV. The reason they declined is because they were afraid he would accept and they don’t want to give him that much money. It wasn’t long ago that people were predicting over $30M AAV for Kershaw. This makes me thing his injury is worse than some people believe. The question is, if Kershaw isn’t worth $18.4M a year… What is he worth? $15M? $16M? $10M? I feel like if the Dodgers were even willing to pay him close to $18.4M a year they would have offered him the QO. My guess is Kershaw ends up signing for a lot less than $18.4M a year or he has thrown his last pitch in a Dodger uniform. It wouldn’t make any sense for the Dodgers to pay him an AAV over $18.4M now that they have decided he isn’t even worth that on a one year deal. Kershaw might have to wait until the offseason is almost over and prove how healthy he is going to be before anyone signs him. I guess all that talk the Dodgers were saying about them being willing to pay Kershaw above market prices because he is a lifelong future HOF Dodger was nonsense. I think this is actually the smartest decision for LA. That forearm injury is scary and it wouldn’t surprise me if he aggravates it at some point and does eventually need Tommy John surgery. It would be a huge waste to pay a guy that kind of money for one year just for him to barely pitch for you and then become a free agent again. I’m going to guess Kershaw either re-signs with the Dodgers for an AAV closer to 10 or 15 or he ends up leaving to go to another team that is willing to pay him more than that. Very interesting development though.

      Reply
      • Chipper Jones' illegitimate kid

        1 year ago

        “If the Dodgers thought Kershaw was worth $27.5M a year they would have been willing to offer him the 1-year $18.4M QO.”

        “This means the Dodgers are not even willing to give him $18.4M a year, much less $27.5M.”

        “I feel like if the Dodgers were even willing to pay him close to $18.4M a year they would have offered him the QO.”

        “It wouldn’t make any sense for the Dodgers to pay him an AAV over $18.4M now that they have decided he isn’t even worth that on a one year deal.”

        You don’t have to say the same thing over and over again in your posts. We got it the first time.

        Reply
        • sampsonite168

          1 year ago

          I don’t think you get it. They didn’t want to pay him $18.4M for one year, which means any deal they offer him would be for less than that amount per year.

          For example, if say the Angels offered Kershaw $25M per year, he might take that because the Dodgers have already indicated that they don’t want to pay him more than $18.4M per year.

          Or say if the Mariners offered him $23.6M per year, it’s still more than the $18.4M the Dodgers don’t want to pay Kershaw because they didn’t extend the QO to him.

          Does that make more sense?

        • cubfever7

          1 year ago

          Brevity is the soul of wit

        • Darryl Rose

          1 year ago

          I think we need a few more examples.

        • The Mets "Missed WAR"

          1 year ago

          I wasn’t talking to you or whoever “we” is. I was talking to @Trillionaire. Based on the statements below there were clearly some people who didn’t get it “the first time.” @bucsfan0004: “Don’t lowball Kershaw like that. He will get 3/50-60 range.” Believe it or not every comment isn’t directed towards you. No one cares whether you “got it” or not. You don’t speak for everyone and based on the replies below plenty of people didn’t get it. You don’t have to refer to yourself as “we” because you only speak for yourself.

        • Darryl Rose

          1 year ago

          Ok but what if the reds offered $21.7 million? What then? I really think it would be clearer if you gave us fictional examples for all MLB teams because your two virtually identical scenarios didn’t bring the point home for US.

    • Al Hirschen

      1 year ago

      The last 3 years he’s been on the DL

      Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      1 year ago

      Dude… are you even looking at your own math and using logic??? $64m minus $18.4m is $43.6m. Wouldn’t it be smarter for the Dodgers to extend him a QO, get him to accept, and negotiate a lesser ’23 salary extension? Clearly, the LA doesn’t think Kershaw is worth the QO.

      Reply
      • Lets Go DBacks

        1 year ago

        64 minus 18.4 is NOT 43.6 lmao

        Reply
    • wileycoyote56

      1 year ago

      AAV higher for 3 years over 2? No wonder California’s broke with that kind of math

      Reply
  2. The Mets "Missed WAR"

    1 year ago

    Wow

    Reply
    • Curly Was The Smart Stooge

      1 year ago

      Wow is right, a .688 winning PCT & a 2.49 era lifetime?
      I hope he signs with the Giants & puts it to the ungrateful Dodgers every chance he gets.

      Reply
      • Chipper Jones' illegitimate kid

        1 year ago

        Wow

        Reply
        • barneyfifethelegend

          1 year ago

          Wow

      • FletcherFan69

        1 year ago

        Wow

        Reply
      • ElysianPark

        1 year ago

        Ungrateful? They treated him very well and respectfully over the years, and it was mutual.

        Reply
        • Yankee Clipper

          1 year ago

          I’m sure the treatment during the marriage makes the one-sided divorce much easier to stomach……

  3. afsooner02

    1 year ago

    Texas bound to go finish his HOF career, like Ryan.

    Reply
    • coupofthecentury

      1 year ago

      Why would he want to spend the twilight years of his career for a franchise ready to lose 100 again

      Reply
      • oldredgunslinger

        1 year ago

        His wife doesn’t want to move the children again. DFW is their home.She has been quite vocal about it.

        Reply
        • Cey Hey

          1 year ago

          Link to Ellen Kershaw being vocal about it?

    • thickiedon

      1 year ago

      But like Ryan, he’ll head to Houston first

      Reply
  4. kc38

    1 year ago

    Taylor…. he’s worth a QO?

    Reply
    • bucsfan0004

      1 year ago

      Yes, you attach a draft pick to players who are a lock to get multiple offers from multiple teams.

      Reply
      • kc38

        1 year ago

        But I don’t see any way he rejects the offer and he’s not worth it

        Reply
        • DarkSide830

          1 year ago

          really? the dude has a great bat and can play anywhere. likely a starting CF in a weak CF market.

      • The Mets "Missed WAR"

        1 year ago

        Taylor is worth the QO and he probably declines it. Taylor might not get an AAV that high but he still probably gets at least $50 million on the free agent market. You don’t turn down $50+M to get $18.4M even if it is a 1 year deal. Most teams would be glad to have Taylor on a 1-year $18.4 million deal.

        Reply
    • amjr

      1 year ago

      Or course Taylor is worth the QO.

      Reply
    • dodgerfan83

      1 year ago

      I think they are certain he wants a longer contract. He may not get aav equal to that, but will certainly get a total value more than that. It’s another way of trying to get him to stay, or get something in return for leaving

      Reply
  5. 2021 great year to be a Padres fan

    1 year ago

    It’s tough for Kershaw who the dodgers exploited all these years, hopefully he can prove em wrong. It’s notable however that he’s so Injury prone lalely for years Now. 1 year 15Mill aprox Range for him i believe

    Reply
    • bucsfan0004

      1 year ago

      Don’t lowball Kershaw like that. He will get 3/50-60 range.

      Reply
      • The Mets "Missed WAR"

        1 year ago

        If Kershaw were going to make $50-60M on a 3 year deal the Dodgers would have just QO’d him. This is a huge red flag and it tells other teams that Kershaw is seriously injured. He will never make $50-$60M on a 3 year deal now. You’re dreaming.

        Reply
        • bucsfan0004

          1 year ago

          I don’t care either way, dude. Look how desperate teams are for pitching,

        • The Mets "Missed WAR"

          1 year ago

          Teams are desperate for pitching but that’s what makes Kershaw so problematic. No one is certain that he is actually going to be able to pitch. If Kershaw becomes some teams big pitching acquisition this season and his forearm injury prevents him from pitching it could kill their season. Teams may be desperate for pitching but they aren’t desperate for expensive players who may not even pitch. No one will give Kershaw that kind of money after finding out even the Dodgers think it’s too risky. If any organization knows whether or not Kershaw is worth that kind of money it’s the Dodgers and they clearly don’t. Other teams will strongly consider that before making him any kind of offer. He won’t get that much per year and he probably won’t get a contract longer than 2 years tops.

    • amk1920

      1 year ago

      “exploited” they gave him a 200 million dollar extension before free agency lmao.

      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        1 year ago

        Exactly! Highway robbery! Pffft, $200MM ……

        Reply
  6. lucas0622

    1 year ago

    Honestly this makes me feel like they’re that confidant that they’re gonna resign him. If they bring him back they’ll still be able to give him a QO

    Reply
    • geg42

      1 year ago

      Agreed. If they weren’t in talks right now they would have skipped a QO.
      It’s a public distraction to a private negotiation.

      Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      1 year ago

      Yup, to me this is the obvious conclusion, and maybe so obvious it’s been totally overlooked as a possibility. The Dodgers aren’t going to fail to give anybody a QO out of courtesy and to make it easier for him to sign elsewhere. Since when is that good baseball business?

      Reply
  7. Thronson5

    1 year ago

    If Kershaw is back I’d have to think it would be a short and cheap deal, can’t see him making top dollar when he’s not been able to stay healthy. If he’s not back with the Dodgers I really hope he retires though, can’t imagine him pitching for another team. I’d personally love to see him back in a 1 year cheaper deal but I guess it’s all up to what he’s looking for. I know for sure Saeger is gone and and I’ve already come to terms with that but would love to see Taylor back especially after losing Joc and Kike, Taylor is just too important. Doesn’t sound great for Scherzer coming back but I honestly would rather him than Kershaw at this point in both of their careers.

    Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      1 year ago

      He’ll get a couple of years at least on a performance based contract.

      Reply
  8. cryptonerd

    1 year ago

    Even if you have questions, that doesn’t mean other teams wouldn’t sign him to a long term deal.
    I’m surprised they didn’t give him a QO just for the draft pick compensation.

    Reply
  9. JerseyShoreScore

    1 year ago

    If a mid-30s SP with an injury history and finishes the year injured, why you commit $18 million to him? These two and three year suggestions for 60 to 90 million seem even crazier!

    Reply
  10. jimthegoat

    1 year ago

    Well that’s really surprising

    Reply
  11. Dodger Dog

    1 year ago

    I’m 99% sure he was extended one right before his last extension when he was technically a FA for a day or whatever, so he is not eligible to receive one again.

    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      1 year ago

      surely this would be known at some point

      Reply
    • Dorothy_Mantooth

      1 year ago

      Kershaw has never been a free agent before. He was signed to that huge extension prior to becoming a free agent, so he could have never received a QO in his past.

      Reply
  12. Mickey777

    1 year ago

    The lessening of importance and value continues for starting pitchers.

    Could Kershaw end up with the Angels? Kind of like when they got Puhols from the Cards. Seems too bizarre to be true.

    Reply
  13. teddyk

    1 year ago

    Obviously the dodgers are much more informed on his injury than anyone else. They deemed 18.4 mil too risky for the injury he has. Why would anyone think some other team will jump in and over pay him? If anyone was to overpay it would have been the Dodgers where he could have gone down as a HOF legend returning yearly to spring such as the other legends do.from the organization’s past. I hope he bounces back with health and can pitch a few more seasons but I also wouldn’t be shocked if he retires if the arm doesn’t heal up. Never thought Posey would hang them up after a great 2021. Kershaw is loaded financially and loves his charity work with the wife. Retiring to Texas as a multimillionaire isn’t the worst thing after all.

    Reply
    • Matt_Angel_Bronco_Laker

      1 year ago

      I agree that the Dodgers know more about his injury. Or maybe they want to allocate resources on perfectly healthy arms? Either way, tough day for Dodger fans.

      Reply
  14. Niles

    1 year ago

    I say for Taylor to take it because he did have a breakout season in 2021. It was hard to miss considering his hitting led him to getting an All Star nod. The only problem with the one year offer is that he is risking himself from getting more money in the future in case of injury or falling within his stats.

    For Seager, I think hes going to be looking for more than just $18.5 million for one season. Even though his agent Boras and him are expecting a 10 year $300 million contract this winter he is not expected to get that much money because teams don’t value Seager that high. Correa is being valued at $32m by his own team. Seager is probably $25-$28 million a season. Remember he has a history of injury problems, his numbers also dipped this year due to injury. He only played 95 games. The last time he played over 150 games was his rookie year in 2016. His run production has be fluctuating over the past few seasons besides the COVID. If they would have had a longer season I think he would have racked up some pretty big numbers.

    Reply
    • Brian Bickos

      1 year ago

      Correa has missed quite a bit of time, too. Seager could get $30m/yr if he signs in N.Y.

      Reply
  15. charlie 6

    1 year ago

    It seems overwhelmingly likely this was simply a courtesy move on the Dodgers’ part. Even diminished Kershaw is easily worth $18M to the Dodgers on a one year deal. The odds of him signing elsewhere have to be very low.

    Reply
  16. Goose

    1 year ago

    Kershaw had two forearm issues last year and has had issues the last three. You are basically paying big money for a guy probably facing TJ during your contract, assuming you sign him.

    Reply
    • RJNarvick

      1 year ago

      Could not have said it better. Lack of a QO might be one of two things- either hoping to have him back on a cheaper one year deal and if it works out have the QO for next season or a parting of the ways. No one pays a guy 25-30M a season with the mileage and recent injury history.

      Reply
  17. Fg-3

    1 year ago

    How people can think the Dodgers are ungrateful for a pitcher who’s about as effective as Mad Bum or Grienke at this point.. these players have made absolutely every penny they can pull out of the teams they have played for. You don’t get paid for the past.. those days are over. Kershaw is a first ballot hall of famer if he doesn’t throw another pitch.

    Reply
    • differentbears

      1 year ago

      Are you saying Kershaw is currently about as good as Greinke and Bumgarner are right now?

      Because that’s an insult to Kershaw. Greinke and Bumgarner are washed, Kershaw is still a number two level starter. His issues are mostly with health, not with run prevention.

      Reply
    • BeforeMcCourt

      1 year ago

      Holy heck you are uninformed

      When he got hurt, his FIP was better than Scherzer

      Reply
  18. robbie83

    1 year ago

    Seager had some shocking errors in post season and doesn’t crack 20 HR a year. Wouldn’t pay him more than 20aav

    Reply
    • differentbears

      1 year ago

      Then you won’t get Corey Seager. He’s hit 20+ twice, and 25 in just 70 games in 2020, counting the postseason. Only 19 in 2019, in which he spent half the year regaining his power stroke after two surgeries and missed 28 games as well. And while recovered from those surgeries, he did hit 44 doubles to lead the league in only 134 games. He’s a high average hitter with good power (OPS+ of 131 for his career), and can hit lefties. Seager rakes, and he’s get north of 20M AAV.

      Reply
      • robbie83

        1 year ago

        I’m sure he will get it but shouldn’t. He wants tatis jnr money but won’t reach his power numbers. How bout the errors?

        Reply
  19. towinagain

    1 year ago

    Respect the heck out of him, would love to see him in Padre brown and gold but highly doubt that occurs.

    Reply
  20. BRUINBLUW

    1 year ago

    Kershaw isn’t going anywhere. The Dodgers FO feels the same way. Otherwise, if they thought he would leave, they’d offer him one. Im sure we’ll see in the next few weeks that Kershaw and the Dodgers agree on a multi-year contract. Sorry to burst the bubble of so many hopeful teams.

    Reply
  21. Joeypower

    1 year ago

    Mad Max and Kershaw pitching for the blue Jays next year!

    Reply
  22. gcg27

    1 year ago

    I think injury more serious than anyone knows

    Reply
    • RJNarvick

      1 year ago

      Was shut down for remainder of season. Would estimate its 50/50 he ends up needing TJS this spring.

      Reply
      • Darryl Rose

        1 year ago

        Thanks Doc.

        Reply
  23. HalosHeavenJJ

    1 year ago

    Angels make sense here on multiple fronts. Six man rotation to limit innings, travel to DFW several times per year, same spring training home.

    And we love injured pitchers.

    Reply
    • Vizionaire

      1 year ago

      30/2+option?

      Reply
  24. yamsi1912

    1 year ago

    Goodnight sweet prince

    Reply
  25. Cey Hey

    1 year ago

    Due to health reasons, there’s a chance Kershaw won’t pitch at all in 2022. As tough as this is for me as a Dodger fan, it’s the correct baseball move. No way do you give someone $18.4 million to spend the year rehabbing. The two sides will work things out one way or another. And if this is it for Kershaw as Dodger, it’s not because the Dodgers treated him with some kind of disrespect.

    Reply
    • differentbears

      1 year ago

      Very likely, and thus very likely the Dodgers give him a two year deal for a little more total than the QO, with mutual options after that. Or an agreement for a year to year beyond 2023.

      I do think Kershaw will only continue if he can pitch to his standards, and even then I think he’s retiring by 35.

      Reply
  26. Darryl Rose

    1 year ago

    I’ve been a ball fan for over 50 years and could count on one hand the pitchers who have been comparable to Kershaw. And maybe one finger. And he kept signing those contracts and cashing the checks so I don’t think he ever felt disrespected.

    Reply
    • Cey Hey

      1 year ago

      True, but some commenters have already suggested such a thing. Whatever happens, it will likely be an amicable resolution between the two parties. They both understand the legacy part of the equation.

      Reply
  27. TroyVan

    1 year ago

    Maybe they’ve already agreed to an extension, in principle, and they just haven’t ironed out the deets yet. That’s my guess.

    Reply
  28. Barelybreathin

    1 year ago

    I don’t see a bounce back for Kershaw. The Dodgers are in a tough spot if he wants to continue to play baseball. No way he signs with the Rangers. He’s a Dodger for life.

    Reply
    • TroyVan

      1 year ago

      I can’t see the Rangers signing him. They’re nowhere near ready to come out of their rebuild. Heck, some say that they need to start over. Smart clubs don’t pay free agents to come in and win them games when they are in tank mode. They shop in the bargain bin to fill holes. Winning isn’t what they want. They just want to be competitive.

      Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      1 year ago

      I fail to see the tough spot.

      Reply
      • Barelybreathin

        1 year ago

        It’s a PR problem potentially. Letting Kershaw walk is a loyalty issue IMO. He’s a sentimental fan favorite. He’s not worth the huge money any more and it appears the Dodgers don’t want to give it to him. We’ll see.

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 year ago

          I don’t see him getting huge money, I see him getting a couple of years of a highly performance-based contact. He’s been on one of those for the last several years, even before the season-ending injury, so we should know he’s open to that kind of contract structure, and he’s more in need of it now than ever. He is also going to be motivated to not allow his years with the Dodgers end the way it did last season. He’s also worth more to the Dodgers than to any other team.

        • Barelybreathin

          1 year ago

          Blue skies. Good post

    • BeforeMcCourt

      1 year ago

      Again. His FIP at the time of injury was better than Scherzer. Top 10 in the NL

      There’s no reason to think he’s done

      Reply
  29. DarkSide830

    1 year ago

    up until this point I felt Kersh resigning was a foregone conclusion, but this to me suggests they are going to let him walk. this move looks more like a professional courtesy thing to me. depending on Verlander’s decision I could see Houston as an option.

    Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      1 year ago

      Funny, to me it suggests the exact opposite. No team gives up high draft picks, or even low ones, as a “courtesy,” and no player would ever expect them to do it.

      Reply
      • Darryl Rose

        1 year ago

        Exactly

        Reply
  30. Brad S.

    1 year ago

    It’s ridiculous that Kershaw’s issue is described only as a “forearm injury”. Why be so secretive about it? If it’s a torn UCL, say so. If it’s not, explain what the nature of the injury is. There’s a huge distinction between a UCL injury and other types of forearm injuries. (IMHO the Dodgers’ reluctance to make a QO strongly suggests it’s a UCL tear.)

    Reply
    • BeforeMcCourt

      1 year ago

      What if it’s exactly what they say- an injury to the forearm?

      The forearm is not the Ucl. If he had a torn UCL, or even a sprained UCL, it would be referred to as an elbow injury

      And If it’s a tear, why the heck is he wasting 6 months of potential rehab? Your conspiracy theory is horribly flawed

      Reply
  31. jim-41

    1 year ago

    Where did Sanchez finished on the Gold Glove list for catcher?

    Reply
    • Darryl Rose

      1 year ago

      He won the iron glove.

      Reply
  32. MannyBeingMVP

    1 year ago

    330 Ks to 3000, 15 wins to 200. Probably takes two seasons for either. Kershaw can retire now and be a first ballot HOF. Not going to Houston. Dodgers or Rangers or retiring. Maybe Kershaw wants to see how he feels physically in a few months? No matter what his decision on playing in 2022, one of my favorite players!

    Reply
  33. louiep

    1 year ago

    Calling it now. Mariners 15 years 489million.

    Reply
  34. taran7

    1 year ago

    If you’re a Dodgers fan you do love Taylor but you also recall the two months where he hit about a buck and whiffed copiously. I wonder if maybe LA let’s him go and replaces him with another versatile player who doesn’t K so much.
    Also, I love Seager but for 3B. His hitting is excellent and he’s clutch but he’s a mediocre SS. Never spectacular.
    If Kersh signed with the Cheaters I would have to go to a hypnotist to have all my memories of him erased.

    Reply
  35. taran7

    1 year ago

    Please don’t blame me for posting twice. I have no friggin idea why this thing does that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Orioles Acquire Cole Irvin From A’s

    Astros Name Dana Brown General Manager

    Rays Extend Jeffrey Springs

    Royals, Red Sox Swap Adalberto Mondesi For Josh Taylor

    Red Sox Designate Matt Barnes For Assignment

    Scott Rolen Elected Into Baseball Hall Of Fame

    Red Sox Sign Adam Duvall

    Brad Ausmus Reportedly Among Astros’ GM Finalists

    Mike Clevinger Under Investigation For Domestic Violence Allegations

    A’s To Sign Jesús Aguilar

    Arte Moreno No Longer Pursuing Sale Of Angels

    Twins Acquire Michael A. Taylor From Royals

    Padres Sign Nelson Cruz To One-Year Deal

    Sal Bando Passes Away

    Twins, Marlins Swap Luis Arraez For Pablo Lopez In Four-Player Trade

    Marlins To Move Jazz Chisholm To Center Field

    Pirates Sign Andrew McCutchen

    Mariners Sign Tommy La Stella, Designate Justus Sheffield

    Royals To Sign Aroldis Chapman To One-Year Deal

    Twins Sign Chris Paddack To Extension

    Recent

    Orioles Acquire Cole Irvin From A’s

    Rangers, Ian Kennedy Agree To Deal

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In David Peralta

    Brewers Release Jon Singleton

    Phillies, Jesus Cruz Agree To Minor League Deal

    Brewers Sign Robert Stock To Minor League Deal

    Red Sox Have Shown Interest In Matt Moore

    Gary Peters Passes Away

    Mariners Outright Justus Sheffield

    Orioles Designate Darwinzon Hernandez For Assignment

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Offseason Outlook Series
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • MLB Player Chats
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version