Headlines

  • Rockies Sign Jurickson Profar
  • Braves Option Vaughn Grissom, Braden Shewmake
  • Jose Altuve To Undergo Surgery On Fractured Thumb
  • Jose Altuve Leaves WBC Game After Hit By Pitch
  • Edwin Diaz Undergoes Surgery To Repair Patellar Tendon
  • Out Of Options 2023
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 Free Agents
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Arbitration Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Could The Guardians Be A Dark Horse For Matt Olson?

By Darragh McDonald | February 13, 2022 at 6:53pm CDT

Since the beginning of the offseason, it has seemed like a fire sale is imminent for the Athletics. One of the most obvious candidates to be dealt as part of any cost-cutting moves has been Matt Olson. Indeed, he was the first name mentioned in MLBTR’s recent list of likely post-lockout trade candidates. Over the past few months, there has been reported interest from the Rangers, Yankees and Braves, but could the Guardians be a surprise entrant into the Olson sweepstakes?

Paul Hoynes of the Cleveland Plain Dealer looked into this possibility in a recent mailbag. In response to a reader who heard the club could be interested in the first baseman, Hoynes responded by saying, “It makes sense, but that doesn’t make it true.”

Olson’s bat would indeed make a lot of sense for the Guardians, given their meager offensive production in 2021. As a team, they hit .238/.303/.407 last year, producing a wRC+ 93, seven percentage points below league average. Olson, meanwhile, had the best season of his career thus far, hitting .271/.371/.540 for a wRC+ of 146. MLBTR projects him to earn $12MM in arbitration this year, a salary that even a low-budget team like the Guardians could afford. Their 2022 payroll is projected below $50MM at the moment, per Jason Martinez of Roster Resource, leaving plenty of room for a salary in that range.

Olson would be a clear upgrade over Bobby Bradley, Cleveland’s current first baseman. The 25-year-old hit 16 home runs last year but struck out in 35.5% of his plate appearances. In the end, he produced a line of .208/.294/.445, putting him just a hair below league average, wRC+ of 99. Bradley has less than one year of MLB service time, meaning he has six years of club control remaining. Given his youth and years of control, he could appeal to an Oakland team that is looking to cut salary. The Athletics have frequently targeted MLB-ready players when making these types of deals in the past, making a Bradley-Olson framework a logical start to a deal.

Hoynes suggests just such a framework as the backbone of a trade, but with the Guardians also throwing in a middle infielder and starting pitcher to balance it out. Cleveland has an abundance of middle infielders on the 40-man roster, making it easy to see them subtracting from that depth. At the moment, Jose Ramirez, Amed Rosario and Andres Gimenez are likely to fill out the infield along with Bradley. But the roster also features Yu Chang, Owen Miller, Ernie Clement, Richie Palacios, Brayan Rocchio, Tyler Freeman, Gabriel Arias and Jose Tena as players with some middle infield capabilities on the 40-man.

The same is true of the team’s starting depth, as the roster currently has Shane Bieber, Cal Quantrill, Zach Plesac, Aaron Civale, Triston McKenzie, Sam Hentges, Logan Allen, Eli Morgan, Cody Morris, Tobias Myers and Konnor Pilkington as potentials for the rotation. It’s feasible the club could view this as a surplus they could use as part of a trade, but given how injuries in the rotation largely torpedoed their chances in 2021, they might be inclined to hang onto all of these arms for now.

Despite the lack of offense and multiple pitcher injuries in 2021, Cleveland still managed to finish with a record of 80-82. With some better health in the rotation and the addition of an impact bat such as Olson’s, they could get back into contention this year, especially if the new CBA results in expanded playoffs.

Share 0 Retweet 14 Send via email0

Cleveland Guardians Oakland Athletics Matt Olson

Calvin Jones Passes Away
Main
Trade Candidate: Randal Grichuk
View Comments (111)

Comments

  1. 48-team MLB

    1 year ago

    *SPIDERS

    Reply
    • Tomahawk Takeover

      1 year ago

      *Indians

      Reply
      • Highest IQ

        1 year ago

        *Native Americans

        Reply
      • Joe says...

        1 year ago

        *Rustlers

        Reply
        • SCarton12

          1 year ago

          *Horse thieves

    • sufferfortribe 2

      1 year ago

      *Tribe

      Reply
      • Yankee-4-Lifer 75

        1 year ago

        *Rocks

        Reply
    • FredMcGriff for the HOF

      1 year ago

      *Steamer

      Reply
    • dixoncayne

      1 year ago

      Once again… grow up and move on. All the whining doesn’t change reality.

      Reply
      • pwndroia

        1 year ago

        Says the guy with a chief wahoo logo.

        Reply
      • baseballdadof4

        1 year ago

        actually, all the whining did in fact change reality. Thus the name change. Just sayin

        Reply
    • ohyeadam

      1 year ago

      Seems off to speculate the Guardians are thinking about bringing in Olson while also speculating a trade of Jose Ramirez

      Reply
      • hockeyjohn

        1 year ago

        Teams are asking on Jose Ramirez does not mean the Cleveland is shopping him. Ramirez will be a Guardian in 2022.

        Reply
    • Old York

      1 year ago

      Cleveland Baseball Club.

      Reply
  2. The Baseball Fan (Doesn’t like the Cubs)

    1 year ago

    No

    Reply
  3. thelegendaryharambe

    1 year ago

    Matt Olson and Colin Peluse for Bo Naylor, Daniel Espino and Gavin Williams?

    Reply
    • sufferfortribe 2

      1 year ago

      No.

      Reply
    • Bruin1012

      1 year ago

      A’s say no they don’t need a catcher but interesting trade thought maybe if there was another cost controlled pitcher but as is A’s say no.

      Reply
  4. Hello, Newman

    1 year ago

    I could see them going after A’s- Kemp. I think Antonetti values the organizational farm, over a big name like Olson.

    I know it’s not the flashiest of names, but Renato Nunez could be an interesting buy low-MiLB sign.

    Reply
    • Hello, Newman

      1 year ago

      Ji-Man Choi would be tasteful and safe.
      Alex Bohm or Frank Schwindel would be suspenseful, little erratic
      Rizzo spontané and pleasant
      Mike Ford would be Joe dirt-Spoof
      Olson, Olson would be unprecedented

      Reply
  5. kennylcx

    1 year ago

    Hell no

    Reply
  6. Asfan0780

    1 year ago

    A’s I don’t think would even want Bradley. Who’s only 2 yrs younger than olson. And if the A’s really need a first base replacement on a non contending roster, they can just shift Seth brown there or give Eric Thames a shot who they signed to an milb deal. And most these articles assume the A’s want to add a young SS prospect, yet currently they have 4 shortstop prospects in their top 12. I would assume nick allen could be ready late 2022

    Reply
    • Col_chestbridge

      1 year ago

      None of their SS prospects are top prospects though. To use Keith Law’s list as an example, the A’s have just one prospect on his top 100, whereas the Guardians have 4, and 2 of them are shortstops (Rocchio, Tena). Either would be instantly the #2 prospect in Oakland’s system.

      Reply
  7. Yankee Clipper

    1 year ago

    Uh, I doubt it. Especially if the story is true about the rangers being involved this year. Seeing how they’ve been going at it I wouldn’t bet against TX getting anyone at this point.

    Nevertheless, NYY, TX, LAD, & Guardians? One of those teams is not like the other…

    Reply
    • Dorothy_Mantooth

      1 year ago

      @ Clipper – Cleveland might have the best package of young talent to offer the A’s and that starts with young pitching prospects. The A’s aren’t necessarily looking for a future All-Star first baseman to replace Olson. They’ll be looking for a package of young, talented players including a 1B prospect who can step right in for Olson so Bradley fits the bill there for sure. Bradley wouldn’t be the centerpiece of said deal; one of the young Cleveland pitchers would be. Of the other remaining teams with interest, only the Yankees have the type of young pitching prospects that would interest Oakland, but they do not have the young, controllable first baseman to help replace Olson in the field. I’m sure the Yankees would try to include Voit in the deal but Voit doesn’t have the years of control or the low salary that Oakland would find appealing. The Dodgers might be able to put together a competitive package too, but don’t count out Cleveland because of their low payroll. Cleveland has a two year window to compete right now, after which tough decisions will need to made on J-Ram and Bieber so it would make plenty of sense for Cleveland to go all out and try to acquire Olson along with an Austin Meadows type of OF too. If they can improve their offense and keep Bieber healthy this season, the Guardians could actually be very competitive this year, especially with a surgically-repaired Tito Francona leading the way.

      Reply
      • jbigz12

        1 year ago

        The Indians are a potentially sneaky competitive team.

        The rotation is really pretty solid & Clase is an electric closer. You add a couple hitters and there’s a team that’s right there playing in a weak division.

        Only $50MM on the books for payroll also. I’d prefer to keep my prospects and sign a few FA’s before going that route but they have some dark horse potential.

        The problem is—I don’t see a WS roster here & when Cleveland had a WS caliber roster they chose to deal guys like Bauer & Clevinger to shorten their potential rebuild & see if they could do it w/o them. Unlikely they decide to push all the chips in w a weaker roster

        Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        1 year ago

        Too wordy for something something so speculative. Dorothy mansplaining once again

        Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        1 year ago

        Dorothy: I get what you’re saying, however with only $50 M on the books they’re not looking to trade their good prospects for two years of Olson. It’s against what they’ve been selling off Clevinger, etc to achieve, imho. The other teams are buying now to win now. That was my point.

        Reply
        • Col_chestbridge

          1 year ago

          Meisel has reported a few times this offseason (from comments from Antonetti) that payroll will likely be going up this season, and that this would be beyond just arbitration raises. Trading for Olson makes all the sense for Cleveland.

          He’s not so expensive that they’re instantly around the $100m or so tier that probably represents their near term ceiling.

          They have too many young prospects at the same position (SS) anyway. And too many prospects on the 40, as 14 players on the 40 have never played in the majors including 11 guys who were just added in November to avoid the Rule V draft. They need to clear 2-4 roster spots on the 40 anyway as they currently don’t have a backup catcher on the 40 (Lavastida won’t start the year with the team), they need 1-3 more relievers (they have only 6 RPs, maybe also converting Logan Allen to long man would make 7, 8 is the goal), and they probably should add a veteran corner OF (that would be assuming any of the rookies don’t make opening day roster, Naylor won’t be healthy in time, and they’re not comfortable rolling an infielder like Ernie Clement or Amed Rosario out there)

          From the Guardians perspective, Olson is the ideal pickup. The question is what would the A’s want. They’re a front office that does things a bit differently, and predicting what they value is difficult.

  8. baseballpurist

    1 year ago

    I think this is the 27th team that’s been in the Matt Olson trade conversation. The lockout needs to end ASAP.

    Reply
    • 48-team MLB

      1 year ago

      Agreed. It feels like this is taking longer than the Mets’ title drought…and that’s a very long time.

      Reply
      • amanda_hugandkiss

        1 year ago

        Funny how this is a Guardians post….

        Reply
  9. RoastGobot

    1 year ago

    You guys got an in w Olsons agent or what

    Reply
  10. In nurse follars

    1 year ago

    There is no baseball news so all the stories are simply reactions to other stories or speculation based on nothing. This is a non-story until it is a story.

    Reply
    • Modified_6

      1 year ago

      That’s why this is MLB Trade Rumors and not MLB Completed Transactions.

      Reply
      • In nurse follars

        1 year ago

        It’s not even a rumor. It’s a fan question to an over the hill beat writer and an article made up to fill space.

        Reply
        • rols1026

          1 year ago

          Exactly. Bunch of nonsense. 0% chance Cleveland is paying for Olson

      • Hörst deVurmehr

        1 year ago

        It’s currently MLB Time Killing Nonsense. But hey, people need a hobby.

        Reply
  11. Col_chestbridge

    1 year ago

    I’ve been convinced this is a possibility since they added 11 guys to the 40 man roster. So I’ve toyed around with another site that does trade values, and found 4 trades that work:

    Olson for Bobby Bradley, RHRP Karinchak, 3B/1B/OF Nolan Jones, SS Jose Tena

    Olson for Bradley, Jones, Tena IF/OF Amed Rosario,

    Olson for Bradley, Jones, RHSP Zack Plesac

    Olson and OF Steve Piscotty (bad contract pickup) for Bradley, Tena, SS Gabriel Arias, RHP Hunter Gaddis, INF Ernie Clement

    I think the most plausible one is the Bradley/Jones/Plesac one.

    Reply
    • West Casey

      1 year ago

      though I doubt that Cleveland would trade for Olson, they certainly should. He fits and improves their team. They need to clear spots anyway and have “all this potential talent”.

      I like your posting of these trade options. Don’t know how value is determined.
      these are from what I think. I did add Tena from your list (disclaimer)

      Offer 1B Bradley (age 25) , ..RHP Morgan (age 26) or LHP Allen (age 26), ..
      INF CHOICE of Miller, Chang, Freeman, Tena,….
      INF/OF Palacios or 1B/3B/OF Jones

      I hesitate on trading Rosario because it creates another hole in lineup. Plus Tribe still needs a LF, like Reynolds from Pittsburgh, who will cost them more prospects…

      Reply
      • Indiansjoe

        1 year ago

        If they traded for Olsen and Reynolds I would be so happy, but when I woke up in the real world I’d probably be depressed after getting my hopes up while sleeping. That would be 2 very bold and great moves, Cleveland’s history in acquiring players via bold moves is nonexistent. But we can dream

        Reply
        • CKinSTL

          1 year ago

          Ubaldo Jimenez and Andrew Miller were both big-name guys that Cleveland traded for. They also tried to get Lucroy back in 2016. They don’t do it often but they will move prospects for proven talent. I don’t think the timing is right on Olson, personally.

      • Col_chestbridge

        1 year ago

        @West Casey, I used baseballtradevalues.

        They seem to overvalue Nolan Jones to me, putting him roughly the same value as Myles Straw or Francis Reyes, and I don’t think he’s really there after a rough 2021. On the other hand, they undervalue Tena a lot at 4.5, which is only slightly higher than the value they put on Bobby Bradley. Tena just made Law’s top 100, won the Platinum Glove last year, was a tremendous hitter as a SS despite being young for the level he was at (115 wRC+ AT 20 years old at High A), who followed that up by winning the batting title in the fall league.

        Tena doesn’t get as much hype because he’s in a system with Rocchio and Freeman (and Angel Martinez behind him), but he could absolutely anchor a package.

        Reply
  12. In nurse follars

    1 year ago

    A lot to give up for a guy with only two years of control. That is not the way the Cleveland front office works. They’ll want assets with three years or more control for that kind of haul.

    Reply
    • Dorothy_Mantooth

      1 year ago

      @Nurse – Keep in mind the current Cleveland window closes in two years anyways with J-Ram and Bieber coming to free agency and/or their last, expensive arbitration year by 2024. So now is the time for Cleveland to go for it, even with only two years of control for Olson. The Guardians will be blowing it all up in 2024 so why not give it one last shot?

      Reply
      • In nurse follars

        1 year ago

        The window? Good lord!!!!! The business model has been for the last 15 years at least “to play meaningful games in September “ so people will still buy tickets. If they happen to have a chance for the playoffs they “spend when the time is right.” As long as they have a “winning” season that’s enough. They aren’t looking at a window.

        Reply
      • Pickles McGee

        1 year ago

        The window isn’t closing on a team with a farm system bubbling over with talent. 2024 is harvest time for the best of them. Olson is out of their range both in terms of payroll and the cost in prospects.

        Reply
  13. LordD99

    1 year ago

    Unlikely.

    Reply
  14. Oneofthesedays

    1 year ago

    Olsen and Trevino for Bradley, Freeman, Plesak and tanner burns, then they flip Karinchak to the mets for Jeff mcneil

    Reply
    • In nurse follars

      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t Cleveland trade karinchak for McNeil directly if they could?

      Reply
      • Oneofthesedays

        1 year ago

        Well i meant in a seperate trade but yeah. I guess flip was the wrong word choice.

        Reply
    • sufferfortribe 2

      1 year ago

      Freeman and Plesak? Dude, put the pipe down.

      Reply
      • jbigz12

        1 year ago

        It’s funny to me that you think a freeman/plesac package is too much for Matt Olson.

        Plesac is a #4 starter w/ diminishing control and Freeman is a potential starting 2B. Has upside but doesn’t have power so there is a ceiling there. Matty Olson is a top 5 1B. He’s going to get a package like that easily.

        Reply
    • SCarton12

      1 year ago

      Who are you adding to Karinchak for McNeil?

      Reply
      • Oneofthesedays

        1 year ago

        Not a soul, well if they insisted some 17 year old lottery ticket still playing in the Dominican league. Karinchak isnt exactly a nobody and is controlled for two more years than Mcneil

        Reply
        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          If you’ve been watching you’d know that Karinchak was absolutely terrible once the sticky stuff was outlawed. I don’t think any team is going to pay up much of anything at this point. He’s a speculative dart. Cleveland is better off holding onto him unless they really believe he was a product of the sticky stuff

        • Oneofthesedays

          1 year ago

          Most closers go thru similar years do some research. i wouldnt put him in the grave just yet and i highly doubt others are either. Mcneil was far far far from a stud himself last year not to mention the clubhouse drama.

        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          I’m well aware of reliever volatility. This isn’t the same situation.

          There’s legitimate concerns about Karinchak. There’s a catalyst that changes the view on him.

          He went from 39 innings 68 k’s w/ elite peripherals to a guy who wasn’t even good enough to be in the worst of major league bullpens. Lost his spin rate and couldn’t strike anybody out after it was outlawed. The only way the Guardians deal him right now is if they believe he’s not capable of that kind of production without the sticky stuff. Because you get about 10cents on the dollar right now.

        • Oneofthesedays

          1 year ago

          Ehh too many longballs and walks but if he couldnt even buy them a 30 year old 2B with character issues who hit all of .219 in those same two months that Karinchak struggled, they can try to sell Mcneil on somebody else.

        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          I’d be more concerned that the guy who was one of the top guys in baseball at striking people out could barely buy a strikeout afterward.

          That’s very problematic. If he was walking guys and giving up HR’s but generating close to same amount of whiffs—it’d be less of a concern for me. Carter Capps was an elite reliever too before his delivery was outlawed. If sticky stuff was the equivalent of that for Karinchak than there’s a huge problem. It just doesn’t make sense for Cleveland to sell that low unless they’ve already came to that determination.

        • Oneofthesedays

          1 year ago

          Have they said he was using the sticky stuff or are we nust guessing? Could be a tiny tweak of mechanics like ya said or he had family troubles affecting his head who knows. Still struck out like 8.9 so it wasnt completely gone. I just assumed the mets might be interested since they have a guy in Diaz who went thru his own problems and their bullpen was actually worse than clevelands last year. I suppose they could send the mets an starter but i doubt the tribe would do that straight up for mcneil since they all have more control and ya know cleveland is cheap.. all just a crapshoot but its fun to look at all of the scenarios. Cleveland 100% has to find some bats and too many of the “fans” think Bradley is an answer. Maybe they take a shot at Rizzo if they dont want to sell pieces for Olsen but still leaves that terrible outfield

        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          Context clues. He was pitcher X before sticky stuff was outlawed and he’s pitcher Y after. Pretty easy explanation. Numerous articles about it too. tYou’d be reaching to go elsewhere.

          Some teams may think they can get him on track. Maybe Cleveland is one of them. I just can’t imagine Cleveland says goodbye unless they’re nearly certain he can’t be close to the guy he was without it. The return is going to be pathetic v the kind of pitcher he was.

        • Oneofthesedays

          1 year ago

          Thats insinuating that every single pitcher who struggled at times last year was on the sticky stuff, little bit of a leap. We’ll see how they treat the balls this year

        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          Not really.

          There’s actual data on his spin rate dropping after it was outlawed. Visual evidence too if you watch. He doesn’t get the same ride on his heater.

          It’d be a leap to try to say he wasn’t. I don’t know how a guy who consistently puts up this kind of spin rate and then suddenly drops when something is outlawed could be explained by anything else. You’d have to actively not want to believe it. There’s just too much data to say otherwise.

        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/cleveland-demotes-struggling-setup-man-james-karinchak-to-triple-a/amp/

          Here is one. If you read that and tell me you don’t think James Karinchak was on the sticky stuff—well then I don’t know that we can have a conversation. Because data is data.

          Players don’t just lose 300 RPM’s on a fastball mid season. That article clearly states that someone who lost 200 RPM’s would be a guy who was using some sort of foreign substance. Karinchak has another 100RPM drop on top of that. It’s plain as day that he was using.

          & I don’t care. It wasn’t necessarily illegal to use and it made him electric. I would’ve done the same thing in his shoes. It didn’t harm him physically like steroids or anything of that sort. It’s just that he was a very bad pitcher without it & it’s not coming back. Every team in baseball knows this.

          Whether or not he can effectively pitch without it is TBD. If Cleveland is willing to sell for pennies that would tell me he cannot. Because they are one of the premier organizations for pitching development .

        • Oneofthesedays

          1 year ago

          Never saw that article, guess he best get to pumping the “legal” stuff

      • Pickles McGee

        1 year ago

        Karinchak alone for McNeil ain’t gonna cut it. But if Cleveland could come up with the right package of a backend starter, reliever and good prospect to fill the Mets needs, McNeil along with JD Davis would solve a lot of their 1B-OF hitting problems — and fit their budget. That’s the only kind of deal I see Cleveland making this year, not an Olson type.

        Reply
        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          McNeil & JD Davis do not have that much value.

          You aren’t getting 2 ML ready pieces + a good prospect for them. If you get 2 ML ready contributors then you’ve gotten yourself a win if you’re the Mets because they’re spare parts that don’t fit. They have some value but it isn’t that.

        • Oneofthesedays

          1 year ago

          Maybe a karicnchak and the older Logan Allen and a lotto ticket or Owen Miller for those two. Davis doesnt have much experience at first tho and mcneil isnt the greatest outfielder so two defensive liabilities in a single trade is kinda going backwards. rumor is the tribe will give Gimenez the 2nd base gig and i Cant see the mets trading both of those guys anyway if it meant counting on Cano at 2B. Vientos will probably come up at some point but he is a terrible 3rd basemen if they wanted to move Escobar to 2nd

        • Pickles McGee

          1 year ago

          Cleveland’s OF and 1B situations are terrible so shuffling JD to 1B and McNeil to LF would improve them considerably. They have MOR and BOR arms aplenty and they had to shift 11 bodies toward Rule 5 protection so they need to move prospects to make room for the season. Those two Mets can hit and they do it cheaply. If anyone has ever seen Bradley play 1B they wouldn’t worry too much over whether a converted 3B like JD can hack it. Makes sense to me.

        • Oneofthesedays

          1 year ago

          I’m sure he can hack it better than Mcneil in the outfield. I met JD when he played double-a ball for Houston, pretty chill guy

        • Pickles McGee

          1 year ago

          jbigz, I’d sure like to see Mets leftovers in a Cleveland lineup that struggles to hit. McNeil, a 5 WAR player in 2019, despite an awful 2021, still has a .824 career ops (Lindor’s is .821). JD is nearly that — .800. He’s a great natural hitter who needs regular playing time which he never found in the NL and the Mets. Each has 3 years of control left and each cost under 3 million. That’s worth something.

        • jbigz12

          1 year ago

          I didn’t say it wasn’t. Just not a good prospect +2 major leaguers.

          That’s too much for those 2.

  15. phillyballers

    1 year ago

    Dark Horse would have been a better team name.

    Reply
    • 48-team MLB

      1 year ago

      Cleveland Ponies

      Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      1 year ago

      I prefer, The Unicorns of the City Cleveland. Affectionately known as the Cleveland Unis.

      Reply
    • Hörst deVurmehr

      1 year ago

      Yes, the Cleveland DHs!

      Reply
  16. brucenewton

    1 year ago

    Can’t see them parting with high end prospects for a vet.

    Reply
    • In nurse follars

      1 year ago

      They have to move at least three players from the 40 to add Leon and two relief arms. Plus for any free agents they sign. At the very least 1 catcher, one outfielder and one reliever with Naylor starting at extended spring training.

      Reply
    • bill-bellamy

      1 year ago

      Olson is a vet suddenly? He’s played what, 3-4 years?

      Reply
  17. sufferfortribe 2

    1 year ago

    I actually believe Gimenez will be included in any trades the Tribe makes.

    (PLEASE)

    Reply
    • In nurse follars

      1 year ago

      A McNeil trade makes all things possible. He can play the outfield or second. Few outfield free agent options out there. Any trade will be a wing and a prayer. Maybe melky cantata or Matt Lawton are available. Or Hanley Ramirez. More options at second. McNeil would be nice.

      Reply
  18. realbaseball

    1 year ago

    Guardians=Cowardly Indians

    Reply
  19. Dorothy_Mantooth

    1 year ago

    Matt Olson & Austin Meadows to Cleveland would really elevate Cleveland to potential favorites in the AL Central. The White Sox are still very good though.

    Reply
    • In nurse follars

      1 year ago

      Meadows struggled mightily against left handed pitching the last two years and has declined from his Tampa debut season which is why he is a trade candidate. Still he is better than what Cleveland has to put out there now.

      Reply
  20. rols1026

    1 year ago

    Lol Cleveland isn’t paying for Matt Olson, what a waste of time

    Reply
  21. zacharydmanprin

    1 year ago

    What exactly is a dark horse candidate in an imaginary event?

    Reply
  22. CKinSTL

    1 year ago

    They do have a surplus of young talent but it seems a little premature in the rebuild process to land a guy like Olson. They have so many young position players.. I think a few of these guys are going to need to establish themselves as big league producers before parting with big prospects.

    Reply
  23. angt222

    1 year ago

    No reason to make a play for Olson when they won’t be retaining him longterm. Cleveland can’t even extend Ramirez.

    Reply
  24. Chisox378

    1 year ago

    why is Oaklant trying to trade Olson anyways, he is a top 15 hitter in the game, dont they want to win?

    Reply
    • Tacoshells

      1 year ago

      Not if it’s going to cost their owner over 80 million in payroll

      Reply
    • layventsky

      1 year ago

      OAK doesn’t want to pay his salary.

      Reply
    • southern lion

      1 year ago

      If Oakland wanted to win they would have kept Bob Melvin as their manager.

      Reply
  25. CATS44

    1 year ago

    Wrong Guardians target from Oakland.

    Reply
  26. b00giem@n

    1 year ago

    Who are the guardians?

    Reply
    • 48-team MLB

      1 year ago

      They are of the Galaxy.

      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        1 year ago

        Who is Groot?

        Reply
        • layventsky

          1 year ago

          I am Groot.

    • sufferfortribe 2

      1 year ago

      See: Men’s Professional Roller Derby.

      Reply
  27. ohyeadam

    1 year ago

    207/294/445 is league average!!!???? I quit

    Reply
  28. Old York

    1 year ago

    Is the article speaking of the Men’s Professional Roller Derby team or the baseball team?

    Reply
  29. JoeBrady

    1 year ago

    making a Bradley-Olson framework a logical start to a deal.
    =========================================
    I don’t see them going after Olson, and I seriously doubt

    And I seriously doubt Bradley would be much more than a throw-in. It’s fairly straight-forward. If Bradley is a real player, then the chances of Cleveland trading him with 6 years left, is about -0-. And if he isn’t a real player, then why would the A’s want him?

    Reply
    • jbigz12

      1 year ago

      Well Teams see guys differently. Tweak things & some guys flourish elsewhere. But in the case—no way. He would be a throw in for sure. Bobby Bradley has serious raw power but he has huge holes in his swing and I seriously doubt that ever gets corrcected. He looks like a Chris Carter 2.0. & the league simply doesn’t value guys like Chris Carter anymore.

      Reply
      • jbigz12

        1 year ago

        He’ll probably be an absolute stud in the KBO in a few years though.

        Reply
  30. jessaumodesto

    1 year ago

    If they ever play again…maybe

    Reply
  31. Tom Price

    1 year ago

    No, but Olsen would be a good fit for the Indians

    Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      1 year ago

      Who wouldn’t Olson be a good fit for?

      Reply
  32. Oneofthesedays

    1 year ago

    Always forget about Josh Naylor, he should def be moving back to first base at some point

    Reply
    • Pickles McGee

      1 year ago

      Unfortunately Josh’s .700 OPS is more befitting of a backup 2B.

      Reply
  33. Deerslayer1

    1 year ago

    Stupid name for a Baseball team, could it be any more Woke ?

    Reply
  34. WoOBle

    1 year ago

    If he costs money Dolan is out. It’s more important for the Ivy Leagures in the front office to be fake PC as opposed to winning a World Series. Because….small market, you know.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Rockies Sign Jurickson Profar

    Braves Option Vaughn Grissom, Braden Shewmake

    Jose Altuve To Undergo Surgery On Fractured Thumb

    Jose Altuve Leaves WBC Game After Hit By Pitch

    Edwin Diaz Undergoes Surgery To Repair Patellar Tendon

    Out Of Options 2023

    Cade Cavalli To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Edwin Diaz Helped Off Field With Right Knee Injury

    José Quintana Out Until At Least July Due To Rib Surgery

    Trevor Bauer Signs With NPB’s Yokohama DeNA BayStars

    Craig Stammen “Highly Unlikely” To Pitch Again Following Shoulder Injury

    Diamondbacks, Corbin Carroll Agree To Eight-Year Deal

    Nationals Sign Keibert Ruiz To Eight-Year Extension

    Rockies Showing Interest In Jurickson Profar

    Andrew Painter Diagnosed With UCL Sprain; Ranger Suarez Dealing With Forearm Tightness

    Marlins, Jose Iglesias Agree To Minor League Contract

    Marlins In Agreement With Yuli Gurriel On Minor League Deal

    Carlos Rodon, Tommy Kahnle, Lou Trivino To Begin Season On IL

    Mitch Moreland Announces Retirement

    Astros Facing Gaps In Extension Talks With Kyle Tucker, Framber Valdez

    Recent

    NL Notes: Harper, Hudson, Liberatore, Stephenson

    Guardians Notes: Freeman, Arias, Extensions, Mikolajchak

    Rockies Sign Jurickson Profar

    Carson Kelly Diagnosed With Fractured Forearm

    Paul DeJong Likely To Open Season On Injured List

    MLBTR Chat Transcript

    Big Hype Prospects: Walker, Volpe, Baty, Grissom, Brown

    Blue Jays Notes: Ryu, Barger, Lopez, Lukes

    Offseason In Review Chat: San Diego Padres

    Astros Notes: Brantley, Yordan, Gage, Bullpen

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Offseason Outlook Series
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2023-24 MLB Free Agent List
    • MLB Player Chats
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version