Top prospect Bryce Eldridge made his big league debut with the Giants in 2025, and while that cup of coffee in the majors last just ten games with lackluster results he still figures to be a major part of the San Francisco offense next with with the roster as presently constructed. Even with Eldridge’s on-paper importance to the future of the lineup, however, Shayna Rubin of the San Francisco Chronicle reported earlier today that Eldridge “isn’t off the table” in trade talks as the front office heads into this year’s Winter Meetings.
That, of course, doesn’t necessarily make a trade of Eldridge particularly likely. It’s somewhat rare for players and prospects to be completely unavailable in trade talks as the majority of modern front offices have developed a willingness to listen on virtually any player. With that being said, it’s not often that a prospect with Eldridge’s pedigree winds up moving. The 21-year-old was San Francisco’s first-round pick in the 2023 draft and is a consensus top-20 prospect in the entire sport at this point. The slugger crushed 25 homers in just 102 games between Double- and Triple-A this year while hitting .260/.333/.510 overall across both levels. Few up-and-coming youngsters possess the raw power potential of Eldridge, who is listed at 6’7” and 240 pounds.
Virtually any team would be naturally intrigued at the idea of adding him to the middle of their lineup, and that should include the Giants. With that being said, Eldridge isn’t without his flaws. He struck out at a 30.8% clip at the Triple-A level this past year, raising concerns about his ability to make consistent contact against MLB-caliber pitching. Even aside from those concerns, however, it’s worth remember that the Giants’ midsummer trade for Rafael Devers gave them their first baseman of the future for the better part of the next decade. It would certainly be possible for the Giants to squeeze Eldridge into their lineup, doing so would substantially limit the club’s flexibility by locking down both first base and DH long-term.
The combination of Eldridge’s imperfect fit with the Giants’ roster after they brought in Devers as well as the team’s noted desire to avoid longer-term contracts this winter when looking to upgrade their pitching staff have made Eldridge a logical trade candidate. Even so, the argument for simply keeping an extremely gifted slugger whose service time clock has barely been started is certainly a strong one. 51% of respondents to a poll of MLBTR readers earlier this week believed that the Giants should hold onto Eldridge, and just 23% of respondents believed that the Giants should consider trading him without bringing in another impactful bat to make up for his absence from the 2026 lineup.
Of course, an acknowledgment that trading Eldridge isn’t entirely off the table remains far from the same as actively shopping him. It’s entirely possible that the Giants would only consider including Eldridge in a deal for a high-end player like Hunter Greene or Tarik Skubal who may not be entirely available in trade talks themselves. Rubin noted that while players of that caliber have been floated as potentially available, the specifics of this winter’s market are not yet set in stone. That too goes for the Giants’ level of involvement, per Rubin, which would lend credence to the idea that the Giants might only consider dealing Eldridge for certain impact players.
With that said, there’s a number of enticing trade candidates that have been bandied about this winter, even with players like Joe Ryan and Pablo Lopez likely to be off the market. Edward Cabrera, MacKenzie Gore, Freddy Peralta, Kodai Senga, and Mitch Keller are all on the list of names that could at least theoretically be had on the trade market this winter. While the Giants surely wouldn’t be interested in parting ways with Eldridge for many of those players it’s far from impossible to see a team with a controllable, cost-controlled starter like Cabrera or Gore being able to convince the Giants to part with Eldridge in order to add another high-end arm to a rotation that already includes Logan Webb and Robbie Ray but is in major need of reinforcements.

NO!!!!!!
Eldridge MLB 2025:
28 AB
13 K’s
3 H (.107)
O BB
Manuel Margot MLB 2025:
19 AB
6 K’s
6 H (.316)
0 BB
And your point is? Wasn’t hard to find a stretch Ohtani had last year where he went 3-30 (.100) with 9 strikeouts — I guess it’s the 4 walks he had that makes all the difference.
Eldridge MLB 2025:
• 95.6 mph average EV → This is elite. Most MLB sluggers live in the 88-91 range.
• 109.7 mph max EV → Top-tier raw power.
• ~69% hard-hit rate → That’s Aaron
Judge / Stanton territory.
• 25% barrel rate → Ridiculous for a first MLB taste.
He had 7 walks not 0. Also an elite hard hit and chase rate
These guys have nothing else to talk about in a slow market, so they make stuff up just to keep this place going. Maybe they could just get rid of these ads if it’s all fake news anyway
The site is called MLB Trade Rumors. You seem to not realize this important fact.
I do realize it. I’m not sure this is a true rumor.
@Coors Field Effect is a Myth
A true rumor? Oh yes, verifiable rumors. I completely forgot they exist…
Hahahahahaha. Please define rumor for me.
Well, when one person makes it up for the first time, and it doesn’t catch, I wouldn’t call it a rumor. It’s a writer trying to create a rumor
I heard a rumor you don’t understand what a rumor is.
Suit yourself. It’s a low level story regardless and “highly unlikely” he is moved
Ah there it is, I see the confusion. You’re looking for MLBfacts.com because a true rumor is just a fact
A “true rumor” does not exist. The moment a rumor is verified, it ceases to be rumor.
Look at all these rumors
They’re surrounding us every day
Just need some time, some time to get away from
From all these rumors, can’t take it no more
MLBTR said there’s one out now
About who SF’d trade Bryce Eldridge for
FFS. Every Giants commentator out there is talking about the will they or won’t they of trading Eldridge.
Just heard a rumor bout me and the girl next door.
@coors
dude, mlb trade is simply d delving into an ARTICLE written by a NEWS SOURCE that speculate that the kid might be made available. Your attitude is unwarranted If you’re not interested then fun by read it. Guys like Eldridge or Spencer Jones are always going to be mentioned in trade rumors. Act like you’ve been here before.
@sad
rumors are speculative. facts are iron clad thus there’s no way to say that a hypothetical is true. you can say they are offering him but the article said they “might be open to offering” him. which SHOULD be the case for 100% of prospects. why would you not listen to offers?
MLBTR is a highly respected site throughout baseball that’s read by FO guys, and players as well. They aren’t stupid enough to risk losing credibility by making stuff up.
If it’s highly respectable, why does it have so many annoying ads? Do you have proof to what you say? The members here are highly unprofessional compared to other sites I have been to. Just a bunch of crybabies (not all, but a lot)
AAA and International player (Ret.) here to completely agree with what Jean Matrac said. If you don’t believe he or I, search for Player Chat in the Search bar for real-life MLB Player chats! You do understand you signed in to read the articles here on Trade Rumors, correct? Lol have a great day Coors 🤙🏽😎🤙🏽
If you don’t like the ads you could just pay for the premium. It’s a couple bucks and supports a site that your clearly frequent.
Still a very low level story either way. I wouldn’t suffice it as a substantial post or rumor when he even said it’s “unlikely to happen”. Writers got nothing good to talk about
Then don’t click on uninteresting articles? I don’t know what else to tell ya, Chief.
That is a good point. I’ll give you that one. I am looking for that great trade to happen.
Why don’t you stick to those other sites instead of annoying people here?
I came back for revenge because I freely posted my opinion and got bitten for it.
If I am that annoying, there is a mute button. Maybe use that instead of intrude on my opinions if all you are going to do is hate
Y’all a bunch of snowflakes
MLBTR Snowflakes—
It has “so many annoying ads” because you’re too cheap to subscribe for its paltry price. Real baseball fans understand how valuable the site is.
MLBTR Snowflakes—
Thank you for your practical solution. I’m sure many of us will follow your suggestion.
Why are you here then ?
You starting by crying about the publishing of a rumor. Oh the inhumanity of it all. How will I ever cope ? Then you keep crying because people pointed out it’s a rumour website.
You sir, are the snowflake.
I guess making stuff up qualifies as a rumor. I guess.
Minasian has recently stated nobody is off the table in trade talks. That’s where it started.
Why bother to read the articles, create a user account, and comment it’s all fake news?
I come here for the conversation and comments. Unfortunately, half of those are pretty bad too.
I’ll make the conversation and comments better for myself by muting you
You sound like a Rookies fan who lives their life in perpetual discontent. Please do not share your bitter cynicism with us.
I don’t understand why people publicly state that they’re muting someone.
As for the dipsht complaining. Yes it’s a rumors site. They report rumors heard throughout the baseball world. Blaming mlbtr for reporting what someone else said is dumb.
I am not a Rockies fan, so you got that wrong.
This is what I have grown to dislike about this forum. You say one thing and everyone jumps on you like leeches and ASSUMES they know everything about you. That’s not professional. It’s downright disrespectful.
Dude, they didn’t even report it… “however, Shayna Rubin of the San Francisco Chronicle reported earlier today that Eldridge “isn’t off the table” in trade talks as the front office heads into this year’s Winter Meetings.” They repsonded to a report in the chronicle…
Last year they said the Red Sox were in on every player and that was way off and completely wrong
And if you mute me after one post, you’re part of the problem. You don’t listen to any others nor want to actually have a viable debate
I know, right? Especially after one post, they want to make a statement by “muting.” That’s what’s wrong with this forum. Too many snowflakes who preach to the choir but cannot dissent and have an articulate debate for something different than their own opinion
Considered muting you knowing you wouldn’t like it broadcast, kellin… then you made up for it with some nice giggles. I’ll keep you in the bullpen… for now! 🤪🤙🏽
Wwll, you call yourself ‘Coor Field Effect is a Myth,’ so it does seem as if you are a Rookies fan. You should can you name to: The Guy Who Hates Posts on a Rumor Site, Yet Posts Anyway,’, or, “One Poster Against the World.”
I see your point, but those names just aren’t cool enough
I’ve had some thoughts. Nothing is as dark as “The Raven” though
I think it’s time I point out the obvious — A site called MLBTradeRumors should NOT report actual MLB trades or signings; since those are facts, not rumors.
Jose, your comment made my lunch go out my nose!
My AdBlock takes care of the obnoxious ads. I am looking for a BSBlock for the flagrant untruths. No luck yet.
Giants know he ain’t it
This is just the MLBTR writer’s attempt at spinning a story when they have nothing better to write about. Heck, some of these ads are more relevant than the stories they write sometimes. This is all filled with “ifs” and “could bes.” At least the ads are straightforward about what they’re selling.
You don’t really understand what rumor means, do you? Here is what dictionary.com says:
“a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts.”
Where is the general circulation of this claim other than the writer himself? Please provide your source
This site reports on what’s being said by others. It’s in the above post. I’ll show you in case you don’t understand.
“Eldridge’s on-paper importance to the future of the lineup, however, Shayna Rubin of the San Francisco Chronicle reported earlier today that Eldridge “isn’t off the table” in trade talks as the front office heads into this year’s Winter Meetings”
lol. Dude is a lock
They should only trade him if it’s for acuna or skenes but I don’t think they have enough prospects with Eldridge to make a big trade happen
They should keep him and tell Rafael to DH (which is risky)
Stnm:At this point Devers is much better on defense than Eldridge who just started at 1B a relatively short time ago. I realize the same can be said about Devers at 1B but Devers played in the infield for many years. Most of us Giants fans would like Eldridge to get some coaching and many reps at 1B this spring. If he shows some progress on D start giving him and Devers time at 1B/DH. Learning a relatively new position while also adjusting to ML pitching will take some patience by all. We have some pretty good coaches Eldridge can learn from. As far as trading him goes, I haven’t seen anyone from the Giants saying he’s available and even then it would have to be a knock your socks off offer. Don’t see it happening.
With that said. That being said. Redundant verbose filler. Just write “however” unless there is a minimum word count to meet
best homegrown prospect bat since willie mays and they wanna trade him ?
Idk those Buster Posey and Tim Lincecum guys were pretty good
lincecum wasnt a bat
and posey was great but eldridge has even more potential
Than Posey? You’re off your rocker.
You’re either a family member or smoking crack.
Eldridge is much like Harry Ford. A long-boosted prospect who got noticed because of his age at different levels of the minors, he actually isn’t all that good. His AAA numbers (remember, in the PCL) last year were just good not great. Sometimes that “look at how good he is while 2 years younger than league average” prospect shine eventually wears off, because they reach their final level and stop getting better.
I suspect the Giants are trying to make hay with him while he still has some shine. 1B only prospects aren’t worth that much anyway, as there are always 1B-men who can hit out there on the market.
He was 20.
What are you even babbling about
That’s precisely my point. The public prospect lists draw heavily from easily accessible data points like draft position, age-for-level, and basic production. Eldridge scores big on all (like Ford). He had good production at very young ages. The assumption is if he’s very young for his level he will continue to get better and better. But that’s not true. All players plateau. They reach their natural level. And sometimes that happens at age 21. Eldridge would be FAR from the first. On top of that he plays the least difficult position to fill.
Teams don’t evaluate that way at all. They see a guy with consistently good not great numbers, including in the PCL, that have plateaued. He’s not that valuable. We just saw that with Harry Ford, who DOES play a valuable position.
So despite tearing up A+ and AA at heights rarely before seen, he’s ’plateaued’ after a 105 wRC+ performance in 300 aaa PA. At age 20.
Got it
It would be short-sighted to ignore the K issue.
Ford and Eldridge only thing in common is they were both rushed through minors. Eldridge made it much faster than ford and established himself as an elite prospect in the process.
Seam: Eldridge has been “long touted” He was drafted 2 years ago. Lol. I’ve read your post a few times trying to find something that made sense. Nothing did. Take some time off.
Although I call BS and chalk this up to a slow day (hopefully calm before the storm this week), I would think Posey would like to build the Giants in the image and likeness of those great teams he played on were built- on pitching and guys that weren’t necessarily long ball first type of hitters, making this kid who’s still so young, kind of a philosophical miscast.
Eh maybe it’s just a slow day at the office for me too trying to spin this LOL (life of a Jet fan on Sundays)
Jets? Condolences.
If they can get a high-end, controllable MLB starter, would be worth it.
Who else are they trading with him to get a high end controllable starter?
@Another Dodgers Fan
Likely only a team with a top young starter to offer.
I’m curious to see how good he actually is. A top starter is worth a lot these days.
Go check his stats, age, and k rate. He’s an elite prospect with an extremely high floor
As a reds fan, you can def have hunter greene for him ! E z choice for reds. They could free that cap space up and pursue another player with it.
Trade incoming for Sandy Alcantara in 3, 2, 1…
Maybe Cabrera?
Eldridge is better than either of those two
Eldridge to Tampa for Rasmussen ????
Not close
Skenes—no way Pirates do that.
Skubal—- let’s dream. If Tigers say yes, you would still have to sign them to a $300 million extension.
The Giants are going to do that?!?!?!
Giants fans still feeling the sting of releasing their former top prospect Luciano last week and wanting to trade any prospect not nailed down. Would do for Skubal, Abrams, Gore, or Duran. Probably not for anyone else.
All those guys are reasonable targets. Maybe not a 1-1 but certainly within reason. All depends on how those teams view Eldridge. His strike out rate may scare some teams off.
Good take.
Guess this means the Red Sox offer of Casas for Gore isn’t gonna get that deal done with the new bidder in San Francisco offering a better/more-controlable 1B guy.
Good move the SF FO on leaking this ‘rumor’??…
Casas was never getting the deal done.
The Nats would likely ask for more than Eldridge. Though him with Ford and Woods would at least reset their rebuild. Since it’s unlikely either Gore or Abrams will likely be around when they hope to start winning.
My guess is the Nats also ask for some young pitcher to go with him. That’s if they even value Eldridge highly.
Eldridge > gore
Andy—
Can’t agree for Abrams or even Duran, who I like.
sting of releasing their former top prospect Luciano
====================
Pretty good comp for Eldridge. Strikeouts still count.
Andy: Feeling the sting from losing Luciano? No sting here. Just relief. Lol
Eldridge is interesting for his power but was not an impact bat at AAA last season. When he connected he hit the ball hard. He didn’t connect often enough to be more than a 119 wR+ hitter across multiple levels in the minors and 105 in AAA.
He was 20
Your point?
He’s way young for the level, obviously.
How many 20 year olds have torn up aaa? You can prob count em on one or two hands
Even Acuna struggled there at that age
And? He was not in the top 100 hitters in AAA. He was not an impact bat at any level last season. Nothing I said is incorrect.
I can count 2 younger than Eldridge that had a 130 wRC+ last season. Rada and Basallo. In 2024 there was 1, Caminero. In 2023 there were 2. Every year there are 1 or 2. Eldridge wasn’t one of them last season.
Acuna played 111 games in the majors with a 3.9 WAR at age 20. At age 19 he hit .344 with a .940 OPS and 151 wRC+ in Gwinnett.
40% of position players that eventually became an impact player with a WAR of 5.0 or higher in at least one season never played at AAA at all and 33% were in the majors for at least 150 PA in their age 20 season.
Back to the subject. Eldridge was mediocre in AAA last season and in the minors overall.
Caminero had a 106 wRC+ in AAA. Acuna 101 PA in aaa at 20: 63 wRC+. There aren’t ‘1 or 2 every year.’
Eldridge tore up A+ and AA.
Just making stuff up
Acuna hit .344 with a .940 OPS in 243 PA in his age 19 season in AAA. He did the same in AA in exactly the same amount of PA that season. He played 111 games in the majors in his age 20 season. Those are the facts.
You are correct about Caminero. I was looking at his minor leagues overall.
Basallo had a 151 wRC+ last season.
Rada was 14% better with the bat in AAA than Eldridge and played the season at 19. He also played a premium position in CF.
Eldridge was mediocre in the minors last season with only a 119 wRC+ as a one dimensional 1B/DH only player. As far as top 20 prospects go its one of the worst seasons I have ever seen when you consider he adds no value with his glove.
You certainly are making stuff up.
Most players who are highly touted do not debut til 22 years old and many top prospects are 26/27 before they reach their ceiling. The point is he’s so advanced in his development he’s 2+ years ahead of schedule
Eldridge had a fantastic season considering he was playing through a wrist injury the entire year.
Sheesh. By this logic, you would have given up on Judge.
Wonder if anything will happen today, this off season has been so boring..can’t wait for some trades,signings and the world baseball classic.
Posey hates Ks
Giants do not have to trade Eldridge. Any trade involving Eldridge must have a huge return with controllable players
If trade is for Skubal (FA after 2026) he must agree to a reasonable 3-4 extension
Any trade must be a win for the Giants. If not, walk away
Any trade must be a win for the Giants = any trade must be a loss for the other team.
Loosing hunter Greene for Eldridge is win/win
The Giants are so delusional. Moreover, the SF writers never call them out for this nonsense and so people just go along with it. I live in the Bay and this team gets the softest treatment from local media. I mean this kid has done little to nothing at the highest level and it’s already clear he is about as one-dimensional a player for his age as can be. And they will only will take Skubal or Hunter Greene for him! Sheeesh!
I don’t think he would be good enough to get Skenes away from Pirates or Skubal away from Tigers. Might take him and 5 more top prospects. IMO
Why do so many of the articles by MLBTR writers have countless grammatical errors? Doesn’t anyone proofread the article before posting it?
Sorry to complain, but the errors in this article were unbearable.
Nick Deeds’ articles are always like this, unfortunately. At the very least, if learning how to write professionally is too hard, he could install Grammarly.
Your write. Unbareable!
If they really thought he would be part of the team’s future, I don’t think they would’ve traded for Devers or even had Smith on the roster last season. If he is suppose to be someone like Bryce Harper, Mike Trout, Soto or Vlad for this team in the future, he would’ve been on the roster all season in 2025. IMO
Harry Ford (MLB’s current #42 overall prospect) was just part of a package that netted his team a LH middle reliever that might become a closer. He got traded because Seattle already had someone better than him at his best position. Bryce Eldridge is in the same position. San Fran would not be trading from a position of strength. Everyone else already knows that they already have Devers at 1B/DH and Eldridge does not have as much value to them as he would elsewhere. I’m not saying they should give him away for nothing by any means, but he has more value as a trade chip than as a Giant right now.
Seems like a trade the Pirates would attempt to make involving Keller
Keller alone would not get it done.
I think you might have that backwards, I doubt Eldridge alone would get Keller. I don’t think it would take a lot more, and I doubt it would ever happen, but it would probably take a similar supporting package to the Ford deal to get Keller.
I would not trade Eldridge for one season of Skubal. No way.
I’d trade him and the entire Giants top 10 prospect list for Skenes though.
Trying your best hitting prospect in years for a chance at a wild card spot.
Kind of wonder why Giants Mariners weren’t matching up on a trade
Ford to Giants Eldridge to Mariners in some kind of deal
Seems like the kind of prospect swap both teams could benefit from. Giants get C competition for Bailey and Mariners pick up a bat
Mariners traded Ford for a reliever.
Yeah, depending on the rest of the players involved I was thinking the same thing. I thought Ford would get much more than a reliever, even a decent one.
There are so many grammatical and factual errors in this piece it’s actually difficult to read. Usually MLBTR is edited pretty well. What happened here? I won’t go through all of them – the double words, the incorrect verb tense, but see how many you can count. It’s fun for the whole family!
Factually, Devers is not signed through the “better part of the next decade”. And saying that Eldridge had “lackluster” results in his minuscule sample size with the big club is just plain silly.
Finally, you really don’t need to begin every other paragraph with, “That being said” – we know you already said it.
The Giants will sign Kyle Tucker, Chris Bassitt, and Robert Suarez
It makes perfect sense to let Devers and Eldridge share time at 1st base and DH and as Devers ages Eldridge completely takes over 1st. He has a spot on the giants. But I suppose if you get a fantastic offer of a controllable young established player. Preferably a pitcher.
He’s not Shohei. You don’t tie up your DH spot with a prospect whose bat hasn’t even been proven at the big league level, Especially if you are trying to compete for the postseason. A team like the White Sox COULD do that because they have nothing but hopes for the future. But a team like the Giants need the DH sot to give their starters a day off their feet during the long season.
Trade him to the Yankees for their amazing prospects that always pan out!
He’s everything the reds need ! A power bat with 6 years control. Greene is a win/win trade. Time for reds to come off their high horse
Freddy Peralta?