Headlines

  • Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On Cubs’ Rotation Targets

By Jeff Todd | November 11, 2014 at 8:04pm CDT

9:21pm: The Nationals and Cubs have not exchanged names and a deal is unlikely, tweets Paul Sullivan of the Chicago Tribune.

8:04pm: The Cubs are engaged with discussions with the Nationals to acquire right-handed starter Jordan Zimmermann, reports Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times. Talks are serious enough that the sides have exchanged names that would be involved, with at least one top young middle infielder likely to be part of the package.

Importantly, per Wittenmyer, Chicago would want to be able to ink Zimmermann to an extension in order to pull the trigger. The Relativity Baseball client is set to hit the open market after this season. He’ll earn $16.5MM in his final year of arb eligibility, after agreeing to a back-loaded two year deal to avoid arbitration last year.

Zimmermann reportedly rejected a five-year, $85MM contract proposal from the Nats last year, and his value has only risen. Zimmermann, 28, threw to a 2.66 ERA over 199 2/3 frames in 2014, striking out 8.2 and walking a league-low 1.3 batters per nine. And that campaign brought him one year closer to free agency, reducing his risk and increasing his leverage in talks.

Zimmermann is, of course, not the only pitching option being pursued by Chicago. Wittenmyer says that Jon Lester is still a possibility, and the club is also chasing the kind of high-upside, high-risk arms it has in the past. Justin Masterson is one of those, per Wittenmyer, who says the righty could be amenable to a low-cost, one-year deal to rebuild his value. Per Chris Cotillo of MLBDailyDish.com (via Twitter), the team has had talks with Masterson, though nothing is close. Lefty Brett Anderson is another possibility, according to the Sun-Times report.

From the Nationals’ perspective, there is obvious appeal in the Cubs’ bevy of interesting, controllable middle infielders. Washington has an opening at second and has said it is interested in acquiring a shortstop option both for depth purposes and to provide an alternative to Ian Desmond, if he cannot be extended. Wittenmyer says the team feels comfortable with its staff even without Zimmermann, though I expect a free agent addition would be forthcoming if an arm is dealt.

While it is far too soon to speculate as to the pieces that might be included in a trade, the Cubs have several possible candidates that could be dangled. Starting shortstop Starlin Castro is signed to an attractive, yet pricey contract. And then there are heralded youngsters Javier Baez, Arismendy Alcantara, and Addison Russell.

Share 186 Retweet 286 Send via email6

Chicago Cubs Newsstand Washington Nationals Brett Anderson Jordan Zimmermann Justin Masterson

Red Sox Notes: Sandoval, Lester, Farrell, Bradley
Main
Central Notes: White Sox, Royals, V-Mart
View Comments (443)
Post a Comment

443 Comments

  1. jljr222

    11 years ago

    This is going to be some sort of crazy offseason. It’s only November!

    Reply
  2. rouscher

    11 years ago

    So do the Red Sox want Cole Hamels? Blues jays? Rangers? Anyone?

    Reply
    • Draven Moss

      11 years ago

      Nope, not for Amaro’s asking price. I’m sure the conversation only took 5 minutes before the other team hung up and went about other business.

      Reply
      • Voice of Reason

        11 years ago

        Hamels isn’t going anywhere until either all three of the big stud free agent starters are all signed OR until the Phils agree to drop the asking price OR until the Phils agree to eat some of that contract.

        Reply
        • slider32

          11 years ago

          Makes sense!

          Reply
    • Andy B

      11 years ago

      sure but teams aren’t going to gut their farm for an ace when they can just sign one. Amarro has no idea of how little leverage he has.

      Reply
    • mainesox

      11 years ago

      For three major league ready (or close to ready) top prospects? No.

      Reply
      • Guest 3583

        11 years ago

        I hope you didn’t take that away from the post above.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          11 years ago

          Amaro has said that that’s what he wants for Hamels.

          Reply
    • Dilip Sridhar 2

      11 years ago

      go all in for lester, same money, no prospects involved at all (he has no QO)

      Reply
      • Draven Moss

        11 years ago

        Lester is gonna cost a few bucks more, atleast 6/130 million I would imagine.

        Reply
        • Nicholas Koch

          11 years ago

          More like 6/150 mill

          Reply
          • Draven Moss

            11 years ago

            Yeah, I was only stating the minimum he would sign, and I think that would be only from the Red Sox. In general, I’d say he is going to get around 6/145 million. I think his AAV is going to be slight less than Scherzer’s, by about a million or two.

            Reply
          • slider32

            11 years ago

            I think the Sox will open up the vault for Lester but 130-150 seems to be the range!

            Reply
        • Dilip Sridhar 2

          11 years ago

          and hamels is about the same $$$ AAV wise

          Reply
          • Draven Moss

            11 years ago

            Yeah, Hamels’ AAV is 20 million which is quite good for a pitcher of his caliber, but when similar pitchers are available via FA, you might as well just target them. The only way the Phillies get their asking price is if they wait untill the right moment, similar to the Cubs with Samardzija last year. Even then, I doubt they get their supposed asking price.

            Reply
          • slider32

            11 years ago

            Maybe Hamels will be a fall back for the Sox if Lester goes to the Cubs?

            Reply
    • slider32

      11 years ago

      I think Cherrington has his eyes on Lester and Hamels to anchor his staff with the good young pitchers like Ranualdo , Owens, and Johnson. Wait that’s four lefty starters.

      Reply
  3. Benjamin Orr

    11 years ago

    Somehow I get the feeling that the Cubs are just warming up.

    Reply
  4. jb226 2

    11 years ago

    Dangerous trade. I like Jordan Zimmerman a lot, but I was hoping to get him next offseason — is he going to sign an extension one year from free agency if we’re giving up top prospects?

    Reply
    • Dilip Sridhar 2

      11 years ago

      Yeah probably an extension window like johan, agonz, miggy, RA, etc…The trade becomes void if they dont agree to an extension (like Agonz) but they can agree to a gentleman clause which lets them push it off but agree to an extension none the less (like Agonz)

      Reply
  5. zeepatch

    11 years ago

    That is enticing. Makes sense for both teams. Thoughts on what the Nats might get in return?

    Reply
    • baseball52

      11 years ago

      It’s one year of control, so I would think Alcantara+. I think the ancillary pieces will be important.

      Reply
      • ironnat

        11 years ago

        Cubs would only agree to the trade if they can sign him to an extension.

        Reply
      • Drazthegr8

        11 years ago

        No way. We’d have to get Russell or Castro as the main piece. If they get a signing window, then we should get a second piece as well. J-Zimm is a Top 20 pitcher.

        Reply
        • baseball52

          11 years ago

          With one year of control.

          Reply
          • Drazthegr8

            11 years ago

            Trade isn’t happening for Alcantara. It’s gonna be one of the big guys…

            Reply
          • Drazthegr8

            11 years ago

            J-Zimm for 1 year > Samardzija for 1.5 years

            Reply
            • godzillacub

              11 years ago

              J-Zimm for 1 year knowing he’ll test the market and that the Cubs have tons of money for when he does < Shark and Hammels at a deadline for a team that cannot afford them at market prices.

              Reply
              • Drazthegr8

                11 years ago

                You also got McKinnon and Hammel wasn’t much of anything… I can’t see J-Zimm being let go for anything less than Russell and it makes perfect sense for the Cubs with all of the hitting depth you have. J-Zimm is from Wisconsin, so he’ll be happy there.

                Reply
          • ironnat

            11 years ago

            Cubs would only agree to the trade if they can sign him to an extension.

            Reply
        • ironnat

          11 years ago

          Z-Mann is a top 5 pitcher. The Cubs have put together a lot of nice pieces however do not have a pitcher of this caliber. They also have the money.

          Reply
          • Alex 24

            11 years ago

            No way in hell is Zimmerman at top 5 pitcher. Not even top 10.

            Reply
      • Encarnacion's Parrot

        11 years ago

        Russell straight up would be my guess. Maybe throw in a middle reliever on top. More if the Cubs are able to construct a contract extension.

        Reply
        • Jason Ruthkoski

          11 years ago

          This trade makes zero sense unless they don’t think they have a shot at Lester, Scherzer, or Shields. Why give up prospects and $ (extension) when you can only give up $?

          Reply
    • Segal27

      11 years ago

      As a Cubs fan I am going to try to eliminate my bias here, but it will not or should not include Bryant or Russell. They are both top 5 prospects in the game and Jordan Zimmermann on one year of control is not worth that. David Price with 1.5 years remaining got Drew Smiley, Nick Franklin and a decent prospect. I believe Price to be the better pitcher and he had more control and most thought his return was week so Zimmermann should probably not get more. The Nats need a 2nd basemen who is also able to play SS if Desmond walks. The Cubs have 2 players who are major league ready and have played significant time at SS and 2nd in Alcantara and Baez. Baez, despite his struggles was a top 10 prospect in baseball, he has huge value, probably more than Zimmermann due to his years of control. The same goes with Alcantara. Baez has so much value I am inclined to believed Alcantara is the most likely to get traded. A deal would probably have him plus a few other good but not great prospects going the Nats way.

      Reply
  6. Robbieb7

    11 years ago

    Strange- why would the Nats want to trade Zimmerman?

    Reply
    • WolandJR

      11 years ago

      Final year of his contract and unlikely to sign an extension for anything less than the market rate. Also, the nats have depth in the ML rotation as well in the minors. Dealing from an area of strength.

      Reply
    • Farid Rushdi

      11 years ago

      They have tried to sign him to a large extension and he turned it down, so he’s without question heading to free agency. The thought is he really wants to head home to Wisconsin.

      Reply
    • Dilip Sridhar 2

      11 years ago

      They have the prospects, it adds up

      Reply
      • Robbieb7

        11 years ago

        Why would they want prospects? They are championship contenders if not close, why trade your best pitcher for guys you hope can help you in a few years.

        Reply
        • Drazthegr8

          11 years ago

          It will be a middle infielder who is ready to play, or really close…

          Reply
        • Dilip Sridhar 2

          11 years ago

          Castro can give them help this year. Plus they have pitching to compensate

          Reply
  7. Gratuitous World

    11 years ago

    i dont follow MiLB prospects to know if i’d trade Russell for Zimmerman but I’d def. trade Hammel and Samardzija….(for what it’s worth…)

    Reply
  8. mark munoz

    11 years ago

    Baez + …? Can’t see Castro moving to second or desmond

    Reply
    • Andy B

      11 years ago

      you’d figure it would be russell

      Reply
      • baseball52

        11 years ago

        I can’t see it for one year of control. I can see them packaging Alcantara and Edwards, who’s had a huge value rebound in Arizona. Vogelbach potentially as well considering the Nats have no long term answer at 1B.

        Reply
        • Andy B

          11 years ago

          Zimmerman is an ace, that’s hardly worth trading him when you won 97 games last year.

          Reply
          • Farid Rushdi

            11 years ago

            Nats fan here: The Nationals have three aces, Strasburg, Fister and Zimmermann along with Gio Gonzalez (average 14 wins per season in his career) and a number-5 starter who won 15 games with an ERA under 3.00. The Nats have several #1 starter prospects at A/AA including Lucas Giolito, who is a Stephen Strasburg clone. If they can plug second, get some depth and then sign a one-year veteran for the rotation until the kids mature, and the Nats will win 100-ish games again in 2015.

            Reply
            • Andy B

              11 years ago

              I’m not a nats fan, so don’t watch as closely as you but also don’t have the home town bias. From my vantage point Zimmerman is clearly your best pitcher, like I said he’s in the top 5 or 10 pitchers in the NL. He’s significantly better than Strasburg or Fister in my opinion and he’s the guy you build around.

              Reply
              • Danny Phillips

                11 years ago

                Nats had 4 pitchers with below 3.14 ERA last year, which was Strasburg.

                Fister had a 2.41
                Jzimm 2.66

                Reply
              • elbeisbol

                11 years ago

                It’s not just you. I watch most games, Zimm is clearly the number one. Fister second. I guess you could argue about that a bit but J-Zimm is just nails and is nails in big situations.
                Strasburg shouldn’t be discussed on the same level as them. He hasn’t put it all together yet and is just not the stopper that the other two are.
                In short, you can’t replace J-Zimm. Trading him would require a huge package, “rental” or no. This is a team that figures to compete next year, not a fringe playoff team.

                Reply
                • Drazthegr8

                  11 years ago

                  Nats fan here. JZimm was the best pitcher this year, but he is leaving at the end of the year and we’ve got a freaking good pitching staff even without him. Treinan and Cole are knocking at the door and would both be great #5 starters until Giolito is ready.

                  Meanwhile we really need a low-cost middle infield stud.

                  Reply
                • TheRealRyan 2

                  11 years ago

                  How is J-Zimm the clear #1, while Stras isn’t even in the conversation? What exactly am I missing here? Here is a comparison of Strasburg and Zimmermann’s stats over the last 2 years. Once you consider that Strasburg is over 2 years younger and I don’t think its any kind of stretch to say he’ll be better over the next 5 years.

                  Stras: 398 IP, 3.08 ERA, 3.07 FIP, 2.83 xFIP, 20.9% K-BB%, 48.4% GB%

                  JZimm: 413 IP, 2.96 ERA, 3.03 FIP, 3.30 xFIP, 16.5% K-BB%, 44.1% GB%

                  Reply
                  • Drazthegr8

                    11 years ago

                    It is kind of splitting hairs, but I think 90% of Nats fans who watch the games would pick Zimm over Stras for a big game. Stras can be amazing, but gets flustered while JZ is a rock.

                    Stras can certainly be better the next five years and he’s a bigger fan draw, but I’d rather pitch Zimm right now.

                    Reply
              • JP Clark

                11 years ago

                Zimmermann is my favorite pitcher and has been for years. I fully expect him to be traded this offseason. He is a guy to build around but he isn’t willing to sign an extension. Rizzo knew he couldn’t extend Zimmermann last offseason so we went out and acquired Fister. The nats pitching rotation is strong and with a guy like Giolito a year away they can afford to trade Zim. Especially if they can get a top middle infield prospect and a couple additional pieces. I don’t expect Rizzo to resign Desmond so they may be looking for a guy who can play SS or 2nd.

                Reply
                • Vandals Took The Handles

                  11 years ago

                  Rizzo is always on top of things. he will not be caught holding the bag.

                  Reply
                  • Guest 3581

                    11 years ago

                    a

                    Reply
  9. Andy B

    11 years ago

    I can’t see how this deal makes sense for either team. Nats should be extending him, he’s their best pitcher and if they don’t extend him the cubs can just sign him next year.

    Reply
    • baseball52

      11 years ago

      He wants to test. Getting traded and re-upping is effectively the same thing.

      Reply
      • Andy B

        11 years ago

        if he wants to test the market then why wouldn’t he want to test it after being traded to chicago. Like I said if he’s going to test the open market just bid on him next year. Cubs aren’t going to be ready to win this year.

        Reply
        • baseball52

          11 years ago

          Because you have all the leverage after being traded. Assets were given up to acquire you. He could definitely still test, but I’m sure the Cubs will ask for terms before they make the trade and see if it’s conceivable that he could be resigned for something near that.

          Reply
          • Andy B

            11 years ago

            I fail to see how that gives the cubs any leverage other than a year window to negotiate a deal.

            Reply
            • bpot92

              11 years ago

              They would have to agree to a one or two week time frame before the deal is complete like Johan Santana and the Mets did or the deal wouldnt go through. If the contract isnt signed the deal doesnt go through.

              Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      JZimm will be extremely expensive and has shown an unwillingness to sign. Nats also have other extension candidates coming up in Strasburg/Harper/Desmond/Fister to deal with. Can’t extend them all.

      Reply
    • Farid Rushdi

      11 years ago

      He’s refused long-term extensions twice. It’s clear he’s heading to free agency

      Reply
      • Vandals Took The Handles

        11 years ago

        He is from an area close to Chicago. He will get as much money this year as he will in free agency next year. He can get a guaranteed contract now that will insure him against the kind of problems Justin Masterson ran into this year. And the Cubs will give him a raise on his current 2015 salary.

        Trade makes perfect sense.

        Reply
  10. HoopDreams

    11 years ago

    Why would the Nats be trading him?

    Reply
    • WolandJR

      11 years ago

      He’s in the last year of his contract and because they could get a monster return.

      Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Last year of his deal. He has shown an unwillingness to sign an extension. Nats would get a great return. They have great starting pitching depth.

      Reply
      • HoopDreams

        11 years ago

        Thanks, wasn’t aware it was his last year

        Reply
    • iLIKEtheGIANTSmucho

      11 years ago

      If they believe in Jordan, Treinen or anyone else in the system to become a legitimate rotation piece, they can free up money to keep Desmond beyond 2015 (Or sign some other extensions, like Harper, Rendon, etc. if they use a guy like Russell at short after letting Desmond walk). For this year, they could sign a short-term guy like Peavy or buy low on a Masterson-type

      Reply
      • Danny Phillips

        11 years ago

        Lucas Giolito is the debatable top RH arm in the minors and will be up in 2016.

        Reply
  11. Troy Engbino

    11 years ago

    its Zimmerman for castro…..I bet

    Reply
    • mainesox

      11 years ago

      That would be an awful, awful trade for the Nats.

      Reply
      • Dilip Sridhar 2

        11 years ago

        how so? They have prospects to replace zimm and castro is a premiere SS. I dont see your logic

        Reply
        • mainesox

          11 years ago

          Castro isn’t close to a premier SS, he’s a <3 WAR player, and a poor defender.

          Reply
          • Danny Phillips

            11 years ago

            Who has major league experience and is still young on a team friendly contract through 2020. That is so valuable.

            Reply
            • mainesox

              11 years ago

              So you get an average-ish player, who is already well below average defensively and should already probably move off of position, except his bat doesn’t justify it. You’ve got him until he’s 30 though, so that’ll be fun to watch as he ages (defensively ability tends to peak around 25, and steadily decline from there).

              Reply
              • Danny Phillips

                11 years ago

                The point is the Nats are looking to cut payroll. They have so many other extension candidates to do the next few years. Castro is an above average option at 2B/SS on a team friendly deal.

                Reply
                • mainesox

                  11 years ago

                  So trade a top 10-15 pitcher for him because he’s okay, and he’s cheap? That sounds like a really bad idea, and it’s a far cry from “he’s a premier SS.”

                  Reply
                  • Danny Phillips

                    11 years ago

                    You really are ignoring my point. The Nats have pitching depth to replace Zim who is GONE after this year. They have no middle IF depth in their system that is close to major league ready. Castro plays a premium position that the Nats lack and is signed for 5 years! Cheap!

                    Reply
                    • mainesox

                      11 years ago

                      No, I answered your entire point exactly in the post you just responded to. You don’t trade one of the better pitchers in the game for a mediocre SS simply because he’s cheap and you need one. Zimmermann has value, a ton of it, and trading him for significantly less than that value simply because you’re getting a player who technically plays the position you need to fill (although not well at all) is a really bad idea. Really bad.

                      Reply
                      • Drazthegr8

                        11 years ago

                        MaineSox, the Nats are beyond their payroll max. They need to shed a contract this offseason. JZ has indicated he won’t sign long-term and speculation is that he wants to go back to the midwest close to home. I think it’s Russell as the target but Castro wouldn’t be shocking.

                        Reply
                      • The Oregonian

                        11 years ago

                        Castro’s one of the top ten SS in the game (if you don’t believe it, try naming ten who are better), and if they keep Zimmermann only to let him leave after next year, all they get is a compensation pick for him! A trade for Castro sounds good for both sides.

                        Reply
          • jiml60

            11 years ago

            He’s a poor defender, if you listen to the narrative spun by the commentators at ESPN who don’t see him on an every day basis. While Castro is not a top-flight glove, he has a good arm and great range and is still young; I’d rather see the Cubs give up Baez than Castro or Russell.

            Reply
      • Danny Phillips

        11 years ago

        That would be a fine return.

        Reply
    • JP Clark

      11 years ago

      He’s worth more than Castro. It’ll be Russell or Baez.

      Reply
      • Drazthegr8

        11 years ago

        I think it’s Russell. J-Zimm is awesome.

        Reply
      • Robert Daniels

        11 years ago

        He’s worth more than Castro? Two guys who can’t combine for a full season in the majors, by themselves, are worth more than Castro. Some where along the way it got lost that Castro is a good bat in a poor line-up with no protection.

        Reply
        • JP Clark

          11 years ago

          Castro is a good player, I just think Rizzo will be looking at guys that are cheaper with longer team control. The Nats have a lot of players with rising contracts. This past season the owners said they won’t be raising payroll until they get the TV deal situation figured out.

          Reply
          • Robert Daniels

            11 years ago

            Again, longer team control? Castro is signed to 2020. Till he’s 30. How much longer do you need? Not only that, but it’s a team friendly deal. You get a guy who is a guaranteed everyday player, who has 200 hit season under his belt, who has nearly 1k hits before the age of 25, who has hit +280 in every season except one, and who is under a team friendly deal until 2020. But the two guys who haven’t played a combined season in the majors and aren’t guarantees to stick are more valuable? Castro is the best of both world, long team control, proven, and is on a much cheaper contract than if he were on the open market. That doesn’t come along everyday. Highly touted prospect like Russell and Baez come around a lot. Proven players under team friendly deals do not.

            Reply
            • JP Clark

              11 years ago

              I didn’t realize his his extension took him through the 2020 season, I stand corrected. Castro would work, but why would the Cubs be so willing to trade him if he’s as great as everyone says he is?

              Reply
              • Danny Phillips

                11 years ago

                J-Zimm is a top 10-15 pitcher, and they have so much other middle IF talent in their system.

                Reply
                • JP Clark

                  11 years ago

                  I am well aware of the talent, Baez, Russell, and Bryant. I figure the only one that is not available via trade is Bryant. His power in that park will be scary.

                  Reply
              • mainesox

                11 years ago

                Hint: he’s not.

                Reply
                • JP Clark

                  11 years ago

                  Yeah I know

                  Reply
      • The Oregonian

        11 years ago

        One year of him isn’t worth more than six affordable years of Castro, though.

        Reply
  12. iLIKEtheGIANTSmucho

    11 years ago

    This makes so much sense for Chicago. They deal from a crazy surplus and get a proven top-of-the-rotation arm that they certainly have the money to extend beyond the season.

    Nationals can get insurance if in case Desmond leaves after 2015, or gain the financial flexibility to extend him with Zimmerman out of the picture

    Reply
  13. Mikenmn

    11 years ago

    Interesting. Wonder what this says about Lester, and the Cubs chances of signing him.

    Reply
    • baseball52

      11 years ago

      I’ve always thought they would sit out on Shields and Scherzer to pair Lester and Zimmermann.

      Reply
      • mainesox

        11 years ago

        I’m not up on Chicago’s money situation, but I wonder if Shields wouldn’t make more sense than Lester if they end up pulling this trade off. He’s presumably going to get several million less per year than Lester, but is still a top of the rotation type arm. As a second piece, to a team already shelling out good money to a top pitcher, it might be a good idea to mitigate your (monetary) risk as much as possible.

        Reply
        • bpot92

          11 years ago

          They have about 70 million in free cash that they could spend if they wanted to according to reports. They had the third lowest payroll last year and only like 30 million on the books plus 10 arb players. If they wanted to they could sign both Lester and a Zimmermann contract extension plus sign a guy like Martin or bullpen guy like Andrew Miller or David Robertson. They have been linked to be interested in all of them(obviously in some capacity and they would not sign all of them). They have said they are looking at a 15 month window to adding talent so dont expect them to spend all 70 this winter but 50 million on say lester a back end of the rotation guy such as Masterson or Brett Anderson and Russell Martin or a bullpen guy could be plausible.

          Reply
    • jiml60

      11 years ago

      Maybe the two aren’t related. Instead of waiting for next offseason to get a pitcher to go with a potential Lester signing, they have Zimmerman now and are a few more moves from becoming a serious contender for the NL Central title.

      Reply
    • Unassisted Triple Play

      11 years ago

      Even if they miss on Lester – one of the big three will take the Cubs max money. Chicago is a very enticing market!

      Reply
  14. agureghian

    11 years ago

    If its Russell, maybe there’s something wrong with him.

    Nats dont trade him imo unless the offer is overwhelming…

    Reply
    • Andy B

      11 years ago

      thats my thinking. To trade him for a prospect when you should be competing for a world series it has to be an overpay. And Russel is a trade chip that the Cubs can spare but it is an overpay.

      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        11 years ago

        The Nationals don’t need to play for just 2015. They need to build for the future as well. Strasburg/Fister/Gonzalez/Roark can suit the team next year just fine.

        If Rizzo doesn’t move him now, he may get nothing in return should he walk next November.

        Reply
    • Drazthegr8

      11 years ago

      That’s not true. Rizzo gives to get. He’s just been really good at finding undervalued guys in trades. The Gio for Peacock, Milone, and Norris trade is a good example. Fister was an anomaly, but who knew that Morse for Cole, Treinan and Krol would be so good.

      Reply
      • agureghian

        11 years ago

        So you’re saying Gio was undervalued?

        Reply
        • Drazthegr8

          11 years ago

          Really good contract vs performance level. Gio isn’t a Top 25 pitcher, but close, and his contract is fantastic compared to what he’d get on the market. Rizzo gave up some good pieces to get Gio, but I’d do that trade all day.

          Reply
          • agureghian

            11 years ago

            I’d say that was a fair trade for both sides.

            Reply
            • Drazthegr8

              11 years ago

              Absolutely. If I wasn’t clear, that was my point. Rizzo isn’t opposed to giving good pieces in order to get a guy he wants.

              Reply
  15. Danny Phillips

    11 years ago

    I knew this was coming. Either Russell or Castro is the headliner from the Cubs if this happens.

    Reply
    • jb226 2

      11 years ago

      With an extension, I’d pull the trigger with Castro as the centerpiece and a couple other decent guys. Without an extension I don’t do it at all. (Speaking as a Cubs fan.)

      Reply
  16. Andy B

    11 years ago

    Maybe the reporter confused Zimmermans and they are talking about trading Ryan Zimmerman, that would at least make a little sense on the Nats part.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      Why would they trade Ryan Zimmerman?

      Reply
      • Danny Phillips

        11 years ago

        They can’t anyway. NTC.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          11 years ago

          They can, he just has to approve it first.

          Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          11 years ago

          That too. But why would they trade RZ? I’m not catching this guy’s logic. RZ has many more years on his deal, plus, he doesn’t fit in to the Cubs at all.

          Reply
    • Shane Flannagan 2

      11 years ago

      Ya, Cubs are in desperate need for hitting lol

      Reply
    • Jim Johnson

      11 years ago

      Why is it crazy for the Nats?

      Reply
  17. Shane Flannagan 2

    11 years ago

    I could totally be wrong, but I just don’t see the Cubs giving up any of their top prospects when Zimmerman is going to be a free agent next season. I just don’t buy it.

    Reply
    • jb226 2

      11 years ago

      Article has been updated to suggest the Cubs won’t do it without an extension in place. That makes much more sense to me.

      Reply
      • Shane Flannagan 2

        11 years ago

        Of course they would but why not just wait a year and you can get him and keep the top guys. Cubs can be playoff contenders this year but we most likely wont win the World Series. No need to trade any of the top guys right now

        Reply
        • Andy B

          11 years ago

          exactly cubs might win a wild card this year, but they aren’t going to be ready to compete for a world series until 2016, so why give up big pieces like that when you can sign the guy next year. This move makes no sense for either team.

          Reply
          • Shane Flannagan 2

            11 years ago

            Totally agree, I mean I can see us giving them Alcantara, Vogelbach, Johnson, some other lower level guys but I doubt Nationals will do that. But no way I see Cubs giving up Castro, Russell, Baez, or Soler up. No way (no need to add Bryant, he will be going NO where lol)

            Reply
            • Andy B

              11 years ago

              The only way the Nats make this move in my opinion is if they get overwhelmed with ML ready talent. You aren’t getting him for prospects.

              Reply
              • Robert Daniels

                11 years ago

                But you’re essentially asking for prospects. Even major league ready talent can still be a prospect, check Bryant.

                I could see this deal getting done for Alcantra, Edwards, and Pierce Johnson, along with a lower level guy. I think the Cubs would have to not only give up a middle infielder, but also two pitching prospects. I don’t think this deal would get done without two pitching prospects being in it.

                Reply
                • Shane Flannagan 2

                  11 years ago

                  I proposed Alcantara, Johnson, Vogelbach, and one of our top pitchers in lower levels. Thats a pretty good return for Zimmerman. Cubs wont give up both Johnson and Edwards

                  Reply
                  • Robert Daniels

                    11 years ago

                    I don’t think they would either, but I think in any trade they’d probably have to. It’s difficult for me to see the Nats trading an ace for one high level pitching prospect. I wouldn’t blame them if they asked for more.

                    Reply
                    • Shane Flannagan 2

                      11 years ago

                      Zimmerman is walking most likely after this season. Those 3-4 players for Zimmerman is a pretty good deal for the Nationals. Alcantara is ML ready and Vogelbach and Johnson about a year away

                      Reply
                      • Danny Phillips

                        11 years ago

                        I doubt Nats want a quantity of good prospects. They want the one blue chipper in Castro/Russell.

                        Reply
                        • Shane Flannagan 2

                          11 years ago

                          Not happening. Just dont see that happening sorry. Cubs rather just wait a year then give up one of those guys

                          Reply
                          • Danny Phillips

                            11 years ago

                            It will rely on Zimm agreeing to an extension.

                            Reply
      • chrisrg

        11 years ago

        The problem I see with this as a Cubs fan is that Zimmermann (who has documented durability issues) is one of the last pitchers I would want to give a long-term deal to.

        Yeah, he’s been fine over the past three seasons…but you can put any number of pitchers with checkered injury histories into a vacuum and pick out a nice stretch. He’s a ticking time bomb IMO.

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          The past three seasons is the majority of his career. Yes, he had TJ, but has shown no ill-effect’s since and has been a bulldog for DC. Plus, TJ is so common nowadays.

          Reply
          • chrisrg

            11 years ago

            The past three seasons is half of his career…which means the preceding three seasons (shortened to varying degrees by injury) mark the other half.

            The fact that you mention that “TJ is so common nowadays” like it’s nothing is indicative of the complacency and fatalism, IMO, that baseball commentators have shown regarding pitcher injuries over the past decade or so. I’m hoping higher-ups aren’t as complacent, but I often worry that that’s not the case, as evidenced by the continued obsession with velocity and power over all else.

            Major injuries and major surgeries are par for the course nowadays–they’re simply expected and shrugged off with an “oh well, nothing we can do! it was going to happen anyway”

            Identifying things like injury-causing mechanics (or vice versa, mechanics that can prolong pitcher durability) will be the new Moneyball IMO.

            Reply
            • Vandals Took The Handles

              11 years ago

              How often was Tommy John injured after his surgery?

              Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      The lack of a good contract will play itself out in the trade. I doubt the Cubs would be giving up their best for a 1-year rental… they either guarantee an extension or they don’t give as much.

      Reply
      • Danny Phillips

        11 years ago

        It all comes down to the extension guarantee then. Cubs will only give up what the Nats require to move J Zimm in that case.

        Reply
      • Shane Flannagan 2

        11 years ago

        Of course, but what i’m saying Cubs should just wait a year to sign Zimmerman. Theo has said many times they are looking to add talent over the next 15 months. Talking about next year’s free agent class how stacked it is with starting pitching

        Reply
        • Vandals Took The Handles

          11 years ago

          How do you know that Zimmerman will sign with them in 2016 when teams such as the Yankees and Dodgers will be throwing money at him?

          Reply
  18. GameMusic3

    11 years ago

    With no draft cost but a second round pick why would the Cubs not just get Scherzer or Shields in a group where there are a ton of startes on the market with no other heavy spenders protected except Boston?

    Reply
    • Robbieb7

      11 years ago

      They could still go after Lester or Scherzer even if they get Zimmerman.

      Reply
  19. cubs7691

    11 years ago

    Nat fans, theoretically what would you take for him?

    Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Only happening if the Nats get Castro/Russell.

      Reply
      • HoopDreams

        11 years ago

        If im the Nats Im doing cartwheels for that proposal

        Reply
        • agureghian

          11 years ago

          Why? The Nats are contenders.

          if Zimmermann is being traded, it should take Russell/Baez/Alcantara ++++

          Reply
          • Danny Phillips

            11 years ago

            Zimm only has one year left on his deal and has shown he wants to test free agency.

            Reply
    • coreif

      11 years ago

      Initial thought was one of either Castro/Russell/Baez. If not, I’d take Alcantara& either Hendricks or Edwards.

      Reply
      • Chris Adams

        11 years ago

        I don’t see Hendricks being moved anytime soon. Out of all thoses guysi thinkBaez has the best chance of being moved.

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          Nats won’t take a strikeout prone player like that. They already have too many of those.

          Reply
          • Chris Adams

            11 years ago

            Even so, he is the most likely guy out of the Cubs middle infielders to be traded.

            Reply
    • Alexander_Brovechkin

      11 years ago

      Zimm is arguably the best pitcher on staff so I would be happy with good prospects from the Cubs farm system. Specifically, I would be happy with one of Russell/Baez/Alcantara plus young pitching and maybe some upside prospects. I’d imagine Rizzo would ask for Edwards or Pierce Johnson but that price might be steep for Theo. I would laugh aloud if he threw in Soler but that’s not going to happen. Realistically, I would think it would be one of Russell/Baez/Alcantara and maybe 1-2 young pitchers with high upside. Middle infield is the club’s weak spot so that’s what Rizzo is asking for.

      Reply
      • Danny Phillips

        11 years ago

        Rizzo is only doing this for Russell/Castro.

        Already had a player who Kd half the time in Espinosa, so no thanks to Baez.

        Reply
        • Alexander_Brovechkin

          11 years ago

          If I were ranking them, they would obviously be my 1 and 2. I could see him doing it for someone like Baez or Alcantara if he gets better pitching prospects along with them.

          Reply
      • Vandals Took The Handles

        11 years ago

        I think you hit it.

        A quality middle infielder that play SS if Desmond leaves at the end of 2015, and a pitching prospect.

        Reply
  20. Christopher A. Otto

    11 years ago

    I think the Nationals are playing with fire. They have World Series potential next year. You don’t just trade away a guy like that, even when he has just a year of control.

    Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Starting pitching depth is the biggest strength they have. Zimmermann will be very expensive and shown he wants to test FA. Nats have a bevy of other extension candidates coming up in Harper/Strasburg/Desmond/Fister. They can’t afford to sign them all.

      Reply
      • Andy B

        11 years ago

        and Zimmerman should be the first one to get the extension.

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          He has turned them down twice. Can’t take the risk of letting him go to FA for nothing.

          Reply
          • Andy B

            11 years ago

            you could try to win a world series with him, and maybe this time let him finish a game he has dominated in.

            Reply
            • Danny Phillips

              11 years ago

              I’m not Matt Williams. Fact is, we’ve tried and failed to get out of the first round twice. The MLB playoffs are the biggest mystery in sports. The goal is to get in as many times as possible. Trading Zimmermann now would help out the Nats for the long term, not just 2015.

              No need for snark btw.

              Reply
    • Robbieb7

      11 years ago

      Agreed, unless they are blown away by an offer.

      Reply
  21. Robert Daniels

    11 years ago

    I will say this, Castro will NOT be part of the deal. And before anyone starts yelling at me, it’s not just because Castro is only 24 years old and it’s not just because he’s a 3 time all-star. It’s because he’s under a team friendly deal. He’s under contract until 2020, so until he’s 30. Not only that, but it’s a team friendly deal. Financially, from the Cubs perspective it makes no sense to deal Castro unless it’s overwhelming package. And I don’t think Zimmerman is so overwhelming to throw away not only a team friendly deal, but an everyday player. Someone like Russell or even Baez makes sense, but Castro makes no sense.

    Reply
    • Matthew Todd Strickler

      11 years ago

      Who would cost the Cubs the most at shortstop over those next same 5 or 6 years: Castro, Baez, or Russell? Also, Cubs are not overly enamored with Castro. I could see them trade Castro,keep Bryant at third, Russell at short (best defensively) and hope Baez or Alcantara can come along at second as they seem to have the highest risk of never putting it together (hit for enough average-let’s say anything .250+).

      Reply
      • Robert Daniels

        11 years ago

        They’re not overly enamored with Baez, not Castro. Baez I am 100% sure is not a player that Epstein or Hoyer would have drafted. Castro on the other hand when asked by Chicago media about the idea of trading him to the Mets, Hoyer scoffed and laughed it off as, “are you crazy?” Of three SS, Baez in my opinion is the odd man out. He’s the guy who least fits the mold of what the Cubs have been drafting. And once again, Castro is under team control. There’s no guarantee that Baez or Russell would take a team friendly deal once they hit big, if they hit big. With Castro, there’s an answer to that question already.

        Reply
  22. ugotrpk3113

    11 years ago

    Theo has a pretty good track record when it comes to trades. I would LOVE to see the Cubs compete next year…

    Reply
  23. elbeisbol

    11 years ago

    Doesn’t make sense for the Nats unless they get a very large package. J Zimm has been their best and most consistent pitcher and they would like to win a world series.
    Also GMs “exchange names” every day with multiple teams, that doesn’t mean a trade is serious. It’s pretty hard to discuss the possibility of a trade without naming names.
    I’d be pretty surprised if they lined this up to an actual trade, but whatever.

    Reply
    • Out of place Met fan

      11 years ago

      Odds are he is not resigned though

      Reply
      • elbeisbol

        11 years ago

        Odds are the Nats want to win a world series this year.

        I’m not saying it wouldn’t happen, but to trade your best pitcher in a competing year you’d need a big package.
        I doubt the Nats view him as a rental in the same light that many on here do.

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          He is technically a one year rental for DC. He isnt resigning.

          Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Zimm has sown he wants to test FA.

      Reply
  24. tom 26

    11 years ago

    if washington does trade zimmerman, that means they most likely resign desmond which means the nationals will not need a ss. chicago would have to offer something else than ss in my opinion. they will need a second baseman maybe depending on what path they want to take but they can just use epinosa if need be.

    Reply
    • Dilip Sridhar 2

      11 years ago

      They need a second baseman

      Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Espinosa is terrible. Trading Zimmermann doesn’t guarantee a Desmond extension either. If the Nats acquired Castro for example they would move him to 2B for 2015, back to SS after if Desmond walks.

      Reply
      • tom 26

        11 years ago

        it is well known in the washington area that its gonna be either desmond or zimmermann, its all theyve been talking about on the sports radios for weeks. as i agree with u that its not a garuntee rizzo wouldnt trade one without knowing he would get the other signed

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          Yep. It makes sense that Zimmermann would be the one to go. We have pitching depth and no middle infield depth. J Zimm has also refused extensions twice and will be expensive.

          Reply
          • Drazthegr8

            11 years ago

            And this would put JZimm close to home. It makes too much sense and I hope it would lead to a Desi signing and perhaps Fister as well.

            Reply
  25. Out of place Met fan

    11 years ago

    Thinking Alcantra and Valbuena

    Reply
    • jb226 2

      11 years ago

      I can’t imagine the Nats take that deal.

      Reply
  26. Brandon Marin

    11 years ago

    My guess is that the Nationals are thinking that if they can’t extend Zimermenn, then you should trade him for some very valuable position players, and then go after one of the top pitchers on the free agent market (Lester, Scherzer, Shields). With the loss of Sorianos salary, plus the loss of Zimermenn’s salary if you trade him, the nats can easily fit in signing of a top pitcher.

    Reply
    • Angels25

      11 years ago

      I think it would be better to extend zimmermen with with the money they were to invest top pitchers

      Reply
      • Brandon Marin

        11 years ago

        But then they don’t get prospects back. Scherzer plus prospects is better then Zimmermenn, even if he does cost about 5 million per year cheaper then Scherzer.

        Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          11 years ago

          But they also want to extend other players, which they could and let Zimmermann walk… but they receive no prospects in that scenario, either. You shed payroll for extensions… makes sense to me.

          Reply
      • Danny Phillips

        11 years ago

        They’ve tried to extend Zimm twice. He wants to test the waters.

        Reply
    • stonepie

      11 years ago

      on the flip side, i think the cubs would be better off just signing one (or more) of those 3 and keeping the kids. i dont really get trading for a zim/hamels type right now

      Reply
    • tom 26

      11 years ago

      good point brandon, i could definitely see that. one of those three would sure want to play for a contender

      Reply
    • Drazthegr8

      11 years ago

      Can’t see the Nats signing a big free agent. They are bumping up against payroll max and this is an opportunity to bring in a cheap middle infield stud while having some money to re-up other guys (Des, Fister, and possibly Ramos, Harper, Rendon). Cole/Treinan can handle this year and potentially Giolito next year.

      Reply
      • tom 26

        11 years ago

        that is possible, but outside of desmond and fister, the other three arent gonna be free agents for many years so the nats have time if they wanna bring on a top contract

        Reply
        • Drazthegr8

          11 years ago

          I don’t think they have the payroll flexibility to take on new 8 figure guys. And, I’m very afraid about letting Harper get close to FA.

          I think Stras will leave in a few years as well.

          Reply
  27. Steve 40

    11 years ago

    What is with the Cubs trying to make trades for starting pitching? Money isn’t an issue, 1st round pick is protected, Castro (who is mentioned in every trade scenario) is actually a good player with a good contract, and there is depth in the free agent starting pitching market both this year and next. Why be eager to deal from our surplus of middle infielders when Castro is the only one who has proven anything yet at the major league level and when there are just as good of pitchers on the market you can get without having to give up players for them? Doesn’t make sense. Don’t make a trade when it isn’t necessary.

    Reply
    • Strugz

      11 years ago

      It could be one of many things: they are doing their diligence, attempting to drive down free agent SPs’ prices, they are not wowed by the current free agents, etc.

      Reply
    • The Oregonian

      11 years ago

      I agree. They should sign Lester, another veteran SP on a one year deal (maybe someone with upside like Josh Johnson), and a back-end bullpen piece. Then they can sign one of Price/Cueto/Zimmermann next winter and have that guy to plug in between Lester and Arrieta in the rotation. That would be a nasty 1-2-3.

      Reply
  28. tom 26

    11 years ago

    also would like to say that unlike some gm across baseball, rizzo actually preforms some amazing deals. he isnt gonna just let him go cause he may not resign/ yes i know im not inside the organziation so idk but the cubs will have to give up more then one top prospect

    Reply
  29. Brian Meyer

    11 years ago

    The haul that Zimmerman brings in would be comparable to what the Rays got for Price. You would think if an extension is in place, the Nats would receive greater value in the pieces they receive, and while I think that his value will increase, I don’t think it will increase as much as Nats fans would like. The Cubs will offer a little more to assure they don’t have to outbid anyone next winter, but they won’t sell their major pieces to do it. As a non biased Indians fan, I think Baez is the most logical trade candidate hear. He is the most expendable of the elite prospects (also probably the least likely to succeed), but also has enough upside to make it worth the risk for Washington. Baez+Edwards+something else for Zimmerman (assuming he has already agreed to 5+year extensions for something around 20 million a year).

    Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Baez is too strikeout prone. Not Rizzo’s style of player.

      Reply
      • Alexander_Brovechkin

        11 years ago

        I think if they include Baez, there will have to be more than Edwards and an upside prospect. If it’s Russell, I could see less on the pitching prospect front.

        Reply
        • Strugz

          11 years ago

          Baez AND Edwards? Epstein would be fired.

          Reply
          • Brian Meyer

            11 years ago

            Nahh. Cubs fans really do have an exciting future, but the one guy you guys need to get over is Baez. Dan Uggla is his ceiling IMO. The guy above me may be correct as well. the Nats may not even be that interested in him anyway. But yes, it would take at leat Baez, Edwards, and another good prospect. Remember, the deal I proposed only goes with the assumption that Zimmerman has already agreed to an extension, so he is more than a one year rental.

            Reply
      • Brian Meyer

        11 years ago

        That could very well be true. I can’t make sense of the Cubs trading any of their other elite prospects however, and I really don’t think the Nats are in a position to trade Zimmerman unless they get one of the Cubs big boys back, so Baez makes sense to me.

        Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          11 years ago

          Do you see Rizzo wanting Baez? Honestly?

          Reply
          • Brian Meyer

            11 years ago

            He could. 40 HR potential is still incredibly valuable, but I admit Nats fans probably know better than I do. I just don’t see the Cubs parting with Soler, Bryant, or Russell, and I can’t really see the Nats parting with their ace for much less than someone who could make a major impact now and in the future. Maybe Castro is the centerpiece. If he is however, It would probably be Castro for Zimmerman straight up. This rumor just doesn’t make much sense to me from either side unless the Nats plan on making a run at one of the big 3 FA pitchers after they deal Zimmerman.

            Reply
            • Danny Phillips

              11 years ago

              He’s only going to hit 40 HRs with 250Ks..

              Reply
              • Brian Meyer

                11 years ago

                Ha yeah I know he is way overrated, but 40 HRs and 200 ks still have value. You seem like an informed fan. What would you be asking for from the Cubs, assuming a deal was already in place for the Cubs to extend Zimmerman?

                Reply
                • Danny Phillips

                  11 years ago

                  If a deal was in place to extend Nats will be getting Russell/Castro as a headliner. If there is no deal to extend I don’t think Epstein would be willing to meet Rizzo’s demands.

                  Reply
                  • Brian Meyer

                    11 years ago

                    Russell won’t be dealt. I think between Zimmerman, Scherzer, and Lester, Zimmerman is the best of the bunch, but if its going to cost Russell, I imagine the Cubs just pass and go after Lester and wait till next year and go after Zim/Cueto/Price/Latos in FA. I will however change my stance and assume this deal is being centered around Castro however. I just wouldn’t expect much more than Castro in that trade. Maybe Edwards is included, but his inclusion would be the ceiling for me. People need to remember that next years crop of FA pitching will be just as strong as this years. No need to blow your wad via trades.

                    Reply
                    • Danny Phillips

                      11 years ago

                      I’m fine with Castro. Nats desperately need MI’s. I’m a big fan of his contract.

                      Reply
                      • Brian Meyer

                        11 years ago

                        I agree. His contract is great. That’s why I think the deal won’t include much beyond Castro. Thanks for intelligent conversation tho Danny.

                        Reply
                        • Vandals Took The Handles

                          11 years ago

                          I don’t think Rizzo buys Castro’s K’s and defense.

                          Reply
                          • Brian Meyer

                            11 years ago

                            You’ll have to debate that with Danny. I tend to agree with him though.

                            Reply
        • Vandals Took The Handles

          11 years ago

          Good conversation.

          I believe Rizzo would want Russell and a pitching prospect. That should do it.

          Epstein locks up what I think is the 2nd or 3rd best starter in the NL – behind only Kershaw and maybe Bumgarner. Zim gets a raise on his 2015 salary, his long-term money, insurance in the event he is injured in 2015, and gets to play near home.

          Win. Win. Win.

          Reply
  30. mikem-5

    11 years ago

    Addison Russell is not getting traded in this deal.

    Reply
    • Shane Flannagan 2

      11 years ago

      Either is Castro, Baez, Bryant, Soler. Not giving up any of those guys

      Reply
      • Danny Phillips

        11 years ago

        If Zimm agrees to an extension with the Cubs to finish the deal. It will be Russell/Castro going to DC.

        Reply
        • Shane Flannagan 2

          11 years ago

          You wont be getting any of those guys for 1 year of Zimmerman. That’s from the DC view, they are getting these guys for 1 year of Zimmerman. Doesn’t matter if Cubs end up signing Zimmerman to a contract extension.

          Reply
          • tom 26

            11 years ago

            agreed but lets be realistic, this trade wont happen unless they throw up the top guys and the cubs shouldnt do that. so this isnt happening

            Reply
            • Shane Flannagan 2

              11 years ago

              I think it be dumb if Nationals didnt take an offer of Alcantara, Vogelbach, Johnson. Those are 3 really good players for just 1 year of Zimmerman

              Reply
          • Danny Phillips

            11 years ago

            I just said. Zimm would have to agree to an extension prior to the deal being completed….

            Reply
          • mrnatewalter

            11 years ago

            Epstein can’t play all of his prospects… they have no value to his team playing in Des Moines. Why wouldn’t you get rid of one so you can get a really good pitcher who would promise to sign an extension in return?

            Or you can keep Edwin Jackson in your rotation and let prospects rot away in AAA ball.

            Reply
            • Shane Flannagan 2

              11 years ago

              Yea, they all only can play SS. Baez will be at 2nd, Russell SS, Castro at 3rd or you can flip flop Castro and Baez. Bryant goes to a corner OF. It all fits

              Reply
      • tom 26

        11 years ago

        then this trade wont happen, seriously though it would have to take at least one of them to even begin discussions

        Reply
      • Joe McMahon 2

        11 years ago

        Then you’re not getting Jordan Zimmermann.

        Reply
  31. oleosmirf 2

    11 years ago

    As a Mets fan, I’m super excited about the Nationals weakening their team 🙂

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      As a guy without a pony in the NL East race, I don’t see the Mets competing even with Washington losing Zimmermann. Sorry.

      Have fun watching Cuddyer play 45 games this year.

      Reply
    • Bryan E.

      11 years ago

      They would be weakening their team in 2014 in a year in which the Mets aren’t exactly expected to contend and strengthening their team for the future with a long-term, cost controlled short stop. If i’m a Mets fan I wouldnt want this deal to go down.

      Reply
      • oleosmirf 2

        11 years ago

        I’m sorry, but having the team to beat in your division trade their #1 SP for prospects is great for us. Could be the extra win or two we need to get a WC berth in a very top heavy NL.

        Not to mention there is no guarantee any of those prospects pan out.

        Reply
        • tom 26

          11 years ago

          but he could just pull what a lot of people thought lester would do and just resign with the nats next year 🙂 lol

          Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Nats can’t sign all of their expensive extension candidates. What you should be rooting for is JZ walking as a free agent next off season with the Nats getting nothing in return.

      Reply
  32. JP Clark

    11 years ago

    In Rizzo We Trust. He’s one of the best GM’s in the game.

    Reply
  33. frankm

    11 years ago

    Starlon Castro and Edwin Jackson for Jordan Zimmerman

    Reply
    • Alexander_Brovechkin

      11 years ago

      Lol. Only if they include Matt Williams for Joe Maddon.

      Reply
  34. Unassisted Triple Play

    11 years ago

    Ok so say the cubs flip Addison Russell for Jordan Zimmermann and he signs an extension. Legitimate question, is Zimmermann that much of an upgrade to Samardzija? Personally, I’d rather have Zimmermann but in terms on on field impact for next season the difference is only marginal. Both high K ace type power pitchers. Now should the cubs hit a homer and nail a top 3 FA pitcher to pair up with him, now we’re talking. This seems to be the blueprint if you ask me.

    Reply
    • chrisrg

      11 years ago

      Trading Russell for Zimmermann, even with an extension, would be a horrid move. They can have Baez for all I care.

      Reply
      • brett m.

        11 years ago

        I disagree, if you are counting extensions. Zimmerman is a top 10-15 pitcher in baseball. I like Baez, but not with the Nats, They already have too any K’s in their lineup and I’m not sure putting Baez there would be a good thing for their lineup

        Reply
      • Unassisted Triple Play

        11 years ago

        Well Baez is still young and his ML sample size is far too small just to cast him off. Let’s not discount what the guy did in the minors – talent like that at a premium position is valuable.

        Reply
  35. tom 26

    11 years ago

    come on you all lets think here, zimmermann is a year away from most likely the biggest pay day of his life. he isnt gonna accept an extension unless its for what he wants the contract to be, most likely somewhere over 100 million

    Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Maybe with the Cubs. He is from Wisconsin, and wants to be closer to home. Cubs have the $$$. J Zimm is at least comparable to Lester and better than Shields.

      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        11 years ago

        I might contend that Zimmermann is better than Lester… and being 3 years younger, a much safer bet at SP.

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          I would too. Didn’t want to get people all riled up.

          Reply
        • mainesox

          11 years ago

          Yeah, Zimm’s been slightly better than Lester over the last three years, and is a good deal younger as you noted.

          Reply
      • Vandals Took The Handles

        11 years ago

        Zim is far better than Lester.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          11 years ago

          Since the start of 2012 Zimmermann has a 84 FIP- to Lester’s 85. Lester has been more durable and thrown more innings though, and put up 13.5 WAR to Zim’s 12.3. Zimmermann has been better at limiting walks, and has the edge in ERA, and is the better overall pitcher, but it’s not a very big difference.

          Reply
          • mrnatewalter

            11 years ago

            Zimmermann is 28. Lester is 31. Age has a TON of value in these cases.

            Reply
            • mainesox

              11 years ago

              It makes him more valuable, it doesn’t make him better.

              Reply
  36. Voice of Reason

    11 years ago

    Consider the source here, guys.
    Gordon Wittenmyer isn’t the best source in the world. If Heyman or Gammons or one of the national writers was reporting this, I’d be more apt to give it stronger legs.

    Reply
    • Shane Flannagan 2

      11 years ago

      I think its very possible the Cubs threw this rumor out to get some leverage for possible Lester deal

      Reply
      • Voice of Reason

        11 years ago

        Or, with Hamels.

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          Hamels will be much more expensive.

          Reply
      • tom 26

        11 years ago

        yep zimmerman wants the money, he wouldnt take any extension and wants to test the market

        Reply
      • Robert Daniels

        11 years ago

        Maybe. Hoyer and Epstein did seem a bit ticked that their name had been connected with so many free agents, so prices could be driven up by agents.

        Reply
    • tom 26

      11 years ago

      according to paul sullivan of the chicago tribune (cubs fans is he reliable?) this deal will not happen and names were never discussed

      Reply
      • Shane Flannagan 2

        11 years ago

        Yes, when it comes to Cubs insiders only trust Sullivan and Kaplan. Only people I trust

        Reply
    • Vandals Took The Handles

      11 years ago

      Gammons is creditable?

      He’s been publishing rumors at the request of FO people for 40 years in order to get a quid pro quo on future moves.

      This possible deal makes total sense for all parties involved.

      Reply
  37. brett m.

    11 years ago

    This really makes sense for both teams. The Nationals are not going to be able to afford Zimmerman, Fister and Desmond. I think the Desmond and Fister deals are easier to get done. The Cubs need pitching. I think Chicago makes the most sense for Zimmerman. He is from Wisconsin but Milwaukee can’t afford to give him market value. Chicago is very close to Wisconsin and can give him that money. I don’t think signing him will be an issue for them.

    As far as names. I think you start with Russell. Zimmerman is a top 10-15 pitcher in baseball. I think this is a fair trade. If Russell is rebuffed the question becomes whether you go Alcantra or Baez. I tend to favor a deal around Alcantra. I like Baez a lot but putting his strikeouts in a lineup that already has too many strikeouts worries me a bit.

    I look for a deal with Alcantra, Edwards for starters. After that I look for another upper-middle level prospect.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      I don’t think Baez gets Rizzo excited, at all, IMO.

      Reply
      • brett m.

        11 years ago

        I tend to agree.

        Reply
  38. jb226 2

    11 years ago

    “The teams have not exchanged names and a deal is unlikely”

    Well that de-escalated quickly.

    Reply
    • Drazthegr8

      11 years ago

      Theo’s floating the idea…

      Reply
  39. tom 26

    11 years ago

    the new reports saying no names have been given back and forth and trade unlikely

    Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      That’s no fun. Long offseason left for that to change.

      Reply
      • tom 26

        11 years ago

        yea lol just reporting it, idk how truthful that guy is tho

        Reply
        • Danny Phillips

          11 years ago

          I just think this deal goes down, maybe later in the offseason. It’s a perfect match.

          Reply
          • Drazthegr8

            11 years ago

            Yep, I’ve been saying JZ to the Cubs for a few months now. It matches up too nicely.

            Reply
          • tom 26

            11 years ago

            as do i, just dont think the time is right right now, see what u can get in the offseason first then come back to this

            Reply
  40. mikem-5

    11 years ago

    Bogus rumor. Oh well, it was fun for five minutes.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      Or that’s what Paul Sullivan wants you to think….

      Reply
      • tom 26

        11 years ago

        well how truthful is paul sullivan? lol

        Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Where there’s smoke there is fire.

      Reply
    • brett m.

      11 years ago

      I woulnd’t be so sure. It very well may be. However, I do not believe the first guy simply made it up. We will see. However, usually, when there is smoke there is fire

      Reply
  41. AR

    11 years ago

    With fans like these, no wonder Zimmermann wants out of Washington.

    Reply
    • Drazthegr8

      11 years ago

      We love JZ and wish he would sign an extension. But that doesn’t seem to be happening.

      Reply
    • Alexander_Brovechkin

      11 years ago

      Fans like what? He’s the best pitcher on the staff but our fan love isn’t going to make him want to resign if he wants to go elsewhere. If he wants to go elsewhere, we might as well see what we can get for him. If he stays and leaves via FA, then we get a 1st round draft pick, at least.

      Reply
  42. Shane Flannagan 2

    11 years ago

    Never trust Wittenmeyer. All us Cubs should know that by now . Just didn’t buy it from the start because just don’t see the Cubs giving up any of the top guys with Zimmerman going to be a free agent next year

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      Is that you, Paul Sullivan?

      Reply
      • Shane Flannagan 2

        11 years ago

        Nope, but Wittenmeyer is hardly ever right. Plus he is basically hired just to mouth the Cubs most the time

        Reply
  43. tom 26

    11 years ago

    and to put the icing on the cake, adam kilgore of the washington post confirms with paul sullivan that nothing is gonna happen

    Reply
  44. Shane Flannagan 2

    11 years ago

    Cubs totally threw it out to get some leverage on Lester most likely.

    Reply
  45. Terry Janiak

    11 years ago

    CHC gets: Jordan Zimmerman + contract extension
    WASH gets: Addison Russell + Kyle Schwarber

    Reply
    • tom 26

      11 years ago

      contract extension will be well over 100 million tho if he doesnt decide to take more money on the open market

      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        11 years ago

        The Cubs certainly have the money… if they don’t, they won’t be signing Lester or Scherzer.

        Reply
      • Terry Janiak

        11 years ago

        Yea it will be. This will be like the deal where Boston got Adrian Gonzalez from the Padres

        Reply
    • Shane Flannagan 2

      11 years ago

      Sorry, no way Cubs do that

      Reply
      • Terry Janiak

        11 years ago

        I beg to differ

        Reply
        • Shane Flannagan 2

          11 years ago

          First off this deal will not be happening. But they would not trade either of those guys

          Reply
          • Terry Janiak

            11 years ago

            Without a contract extension? Your correct.

            With a contract extension this is very possible.

            Just think about how you got Russell in the first place… for a 1 year 2month rental of Samardjia

            Reply
            • Shane Flannagan 2

              11 years ago

              Wasn’t just for Samardjia, Jason Hammel who you can make the case was better then Samardjia in the first half was also in the deal

              Reply
              • Terry Janiak

                11 years ago

                Hammel was only a 2month year rental, plus you guys got mckinney as well.

                So 2 rentals for Russell and Mckinney.

                Reply
                • Shane Flannagan 2

                  11 years ago

                  Samardzija wasn’t a rental and Hammel was pitching better then him. If the Cubs got Zimmerman and one of your top young pitchers for Russell as the main piece, then it would make some sense then

                  Reply
                  • Drazthegr8

                    11 years ago

                    Come on, McKinney had more trade value than Hammel.

                    Reply
                    • sgtschmidt11

                      11 years ago

                      I think the part you’re missing is that A. It was a mid-season trade and B. the A’s were going for the World Series win for THIS season

                      It seems to me the Cubs are going for a World Series win sometime soon, not in any particular year.

                      Ergo, no way do the Cubs make that trade. It simply doesn’t make sense for them.

                      Reply
                  • Terry Janiak

                    11 years ago

                    Samardjia only had 1 year 2months left so its not like the A’s were getting him for the long term.

                    Plus Zimmerman is a better pitcher than both of them

                    Zimmerman agreeing to a contrract extension > Samradzjia for 1 year 2months and Hammel for 2 months

                    Reply
                    • Shane Flannagan 2

                      11 years ago

                      Ok, but to say Russell and Schwarber come on. Some of the deals I have seen are pretty funny on here. Look what the Rays got for Price.

                      Reply
                      • Terry Janiak

                        11 years ago

                        cant remember the specifics but the Rays made out quite well. Smyly out pitched Price and they got 2 prospects to go along with him

                        Reply
                        • Shane Flannagan 2

                          11 years ago

                          I know Smyly is a good pitcher, but don’t think the 2 prospects were any top 50 guys. I have seen some deals on here thinking Nats should get Russel, Schwarber, Edwards for Zimmerman. I mean come on

                          Reply
                          • Terry Janiak

                            11 years ago

                            Yea thats a little far fetched. But Zimmerman agreeing to a contract extension is pretty valuable

                            Reply
    • Varmit_Cnty

      11 years ago

      That’s funny! One year of control for Russell and Schwarber. Love this site, never know what your going to see

      Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      I like that deal as a Nats fan.

      Reply
      • Drazthegr8

        11 years ago

        Agree. I wouldn’t be surprised to see something like that and perhaps Storen also going to the Cubs (I would be sad to see Storen go).

        Reply
  46. tom 26

    11 years ago

    legitimate question: zimmermann still does have a year left and may try and get every penny out of the nats he can and if they dont he may just accept their best offer. he has the statistics to demand the money and he rejecting the contract offers may just be on purpose to scare the nats into paying him what he wants. is this even a possibility or no?

    Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      I don’t think so, 2015 is his last year in DC at the most.

      Reply
    • Drazthegr8

      11 years ago

      Certainly, but Rizzo is not the kind of guy to take chances. He’s super prepared with Plan A, B, and C.

      Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      I don’t know if the Nats are that terrified. They aren’t hurting with pitching and without Zimmermann, the decision for who to extend becomes easier.

      As for Zimmermann, there certainly is a ton of risk in waiting it out. You’re risking serious injury, a huge down year, or other factors that could draw teams away from him.

      Also keep in mind, while Zimmermann will be one of, if not THE best pitching option next winter (barring a Price extension), there are tons of other options. It is sometimes advantageous to jump ahead of the market and sign an extension before you are competing with 3-5 other high caliber guys on the open market.

      Zimmermann may be better off getting traded and signing an extension.

      Reply
      • Ryan Downs III

        11 years ago

        Johnny Cueto will be better.

        Reply
  47. Matt 40

    11 years ago

    Nats fans can keep dreaming. Theo and Jed are trying to fleece Washington like the Tigers did for Price and give up nothing. They aren’t giving up anyone of value for 1 year of service.

    Reply
    • tom 26

      11 years ago

      well maybe theo can ask rizzo for tips on how to fleece people as its well proven rizzo is the master of fleecing based on his past trades

      Reply
      • Drazthegr8

        11 years ago

        Fister is the anomaly. Rizzo is willing to give up good players to get a guy who he targets.

        Reply
        • tom 26

          11 years ago

          well it depends on how u view it, langerhans for morse trade. the gio gonzalez trade, wilson ramos trade as well as the denard span trade

          Reply
          • Drazthegr8

            11 years ago

            Gio for Norris, Peacock, and Milone… hardly a ripoff.
            Span for Meyer… hardly a ripoff.
            Ramos for Capps was lopsided, but the Twins needed the arm and it wasn’t considered a bad deal at the time.
            Rizzo scored for Morse… but that was a great find by him.

            Reply
      • Ryan Downs III

        11 years ago

        Theo doesn’t need tips. He fleeced the Orioles in trading Feldman, he fleeced Texas in trading Garza, and he fleeced Oakland in the Samardzija/Hammel deal.

        Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      Rizzo is too smart to get fleeced. He won’t move Zimm unless he gets appropriate value.

      Reply
    • Andy B

      11 years ago

      My guess is it’s a leverage move to try to get Amarro to lower his demands for Hamels.

      Reply
      • Drazthegr8

        11 years ago

        Could be. Rizzo doesn’t gossip, so this was definitely floated by the Cubs’ side.

        Reply
        • Andy B

          11 years ago

          yah it makes no sense that Rizzo would want a story like that out. I’m sure they want to try to sign Zimmerman longterm.

          Reply
          • Danny Phillips

            11 years ago

            They have tried and failed numerous times. Plus, they have other extensions to worry about. The price tag for him is getting too high. Rizzo will be looking for the right offer to move him if it comes along.

            Reply
            • Andy B

              11 years ago

              the report earlier was that they offer 5/85, that’s not close to the neighborhood it would take to get it done. On the open market Zimmerman could get a greinke deal, so for an extension you could get a discount on that, but not that extreme.

              Reply
  48. Vandals Took The Handles

    11 years ago

    Make the same trade with the Twins for Santana, Escobar or Dozier. Twins send Alex Meyer back to the Nationals, get Michael Taylor to play CF.

    Reply
    • Drazthegr8

      11 years ago

      Huh? Meyer isn’t needed with Cole/Treinan/Jordan/Giolito. We need a young middle infield stud to trade JZimm.

      Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      Where would Washington play Santana?

      Reply
      • Vandals Took The Handles

        11 years ago

        Santana can play 2B.

        Reply
    • tom 26

      11 years ago

      wait taylor goes to the twins or stay in dc? span isnt moving out of center field

      Reply
    • Andy B

      11 years ago

      why would the twins do that? They aren’t ready to compete even with zimmerman.

      Reply
      • Vandals Took The Handles

        11 years ago

        In the AL Central they sure would be competitors for at least a WC.

        Reply
  49. Matt 40

    11 years ago

    I don’t see this deal happening. The Cubs have spent 3+ years building this farm system. They aren’t just going to trade away a prized prospect such as Russel, Baez etc for a 1-year player. I see them going after Jon Lester/Russell Martin. Their is no way Washington is getting a remotely close. Maybe a Billy Mckinney/Cj Edwards.

    Reply
    • Danny Phillips

      11 years ago

      It’s only happening imo if JZimm agrees to an extension with the Cubs as part of the deal.

      Reply
    • Shane Flannagan 2

      11 years ago

      Good chance Zimmerman is a free agent next offseason also and even if he isn’t they can still most likely can get Price, Cueto, Samardzija, maybe Grinke if he opts out. My proposal was Alcantara, Johnson, Vogelbach, lower level SP for Zimmerman

      Reply
      • Terry Janiak

        11 years ago

        Is that agreeing to a contract extension?

        Reply
        • Shane Flannagan 2

          11 years ago

          No, but I’m pretty confident Cubs would pretty much give him what he wants. So for most part in the end it would be

          Reply
          • tom 26

            11 years ago

            i would feel that hypothecially tho that it would have to be two middle infielders, nats are stocked up with young pitching, having a lot of it so if this trade does happen the nats wouldnt want pitching but idk

            Reply
          • Terry Janiak

            11 years ago

            Thats a pretty hefty package to pay for a 1 year rental for a team that finished in last place.

            The Cubs won’t get any 1 year rentals. What if there furthor away from contention than they thought. Even the highest regarded Prospects need time to develope

            I cant see them making a deal without him agreeing to a contract extension

            Reply
      • Drazthegr8

        11 years ago

        We don’t need those guys. It’s gotta be a stud middle infielder in return or Rizzo won’t make the deal.

        Reply
        • Shane Flannagan 2

          11 years ago

          Wont make the deal then and Nationals will get nothing for Zimmerman then

          Reply
          • mrnatewalter

            11 years ago

            Because there’s no other teams that will trade for a guy like Zimm?

            Reply
            • Shane Flannagan 2

              11 years ago

              What other team has what you all are asking for from the Cubs? Seen a lot of you thinking just Russell isn’t even enough when it comes to the top guys

              Reply
              • mrnatewalter

                11 years ago

                Mariners and Dodgers… just to name two.

                Reply
                • Shane Flannagan 2

                  11 years ago

                  Their farm systems are better then the Cubs? And both of those teams just really really need another starter ?

                  Reply
                  • tom 26

                    11 years ago

                    what about a trade with the angels around a howie kendrick? add some on either side, the angels want to trade him

                    Reply
                    • mrnatewalter

                      11 years ago

                      Kendrick is a FA next year as well… I can’t imagine either team would make that trade.

                      Reply
                  • mrnatewalter

                    11 years ago

                    You didn’t ask who has a better farm system, you asked who has what the Nationals would want.

                    That’s not to say that those teams wouldn’t go for that… but honestly, you don’t think the Dodgers wouldn’t get excited over the prospect (no pun intended) of Kershaw-Greinke-Zimmermann? They definitely have what it takes to get Zimm there (as a Giants fan, I hope they don’t) and better, the money to replace whatever prospect they lose in the deal.

                    Point is, there are plenty of teams who could put together a package for Zimmermann. It obviously gets worse the longer the Nationals wait, but they’ll get something.

                    Reply
              • Guest 3582

                11 years ago

                but what if russell isnt up to scratch, gets injured etc, the nats need two of them

                Reply
          • Drazthegr8

            11 years ago

            Except for a year of his services…

            Someone will give a top middle infield guy for JZimm or Rizzo will keep him for 2015.

            Reply
  50. Andy B

    11 years ago

    This move never made sense, and like normally during this season when it doesn’t make sense we normally find out an hour or two later it’s not true. My guess is this was misinformation put out there to get Amarro to drop the price on Hamels.

    Reply
    • Shane Flannagan 2

      11 years ago

      Or for Lester to lower what he wants maybe. Show the Cubs willing to move away from him

      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        11 years ago

        The Cubs aren’t the only ones in on Lester. I’m sure he’ll move on just fine.

        Reply
        • Shane Flannagan 2

          11 years ago

          I know he’s not but I do think it comes down to Cubs and Red Sox

          Reply
          • mrnatewalter

            11 years ago

            I just don’t think these guys are going to fall for silly games you are suggesting the Front Office is playing. They all have agents who know this business. I’m not sure they are doing what you are suggesting they are.

            Reply
  51. Terry Janiak

    11 years ago

    So if the Cubs get Zimmerman, thats one less suitor for Hammels. Hammels will force that 5th year option to be picked up as well… His trade value is getting killed

    Reply
  52. Matt 40

    11 years ago

    Call me crazy but I feel the Cubs don’t need to make this trade. Arrieta, T. Wood aren’t exactly chopped liver. K. Hendricks went 7-2 last year. We could get Lester this year and Price next year and our rotation would be money.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      11 years ago

      You think the Tigers won’t extend Price?

      Reply
      • Matt 40

        11 years ago

        I just pulled a name tbh. I’m not a fan of Cueto

        Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          11 years ago

          I think Cueto will be the biggest name available for pitchers, honestly. I think Zimmermann will be dished and sign an extension, I think Price is a lock to sign an extension. Cueto may be the biggest name available.

          Reply
    • Terry Janiak

      11 years ago

      I don’t see them dishing out 300 million for 2 pitchers. Both Lester and Price’s contracts will look bad at the back end of the deal

      Reply
      • Matt 40

        11 years ago

        I agree. I’m not a fan of throwing crazy money at FA pitchers. It usually blows up.

        Reply
        • Terry Janiak

          11 years ago

          signing one big free agent pitcher is fine if you have the money, but 2 is just absurd and will sure backfire

          Reply
  53. bobbybaseball

    11 years ago

    It’s Sullivan vs Wittenmyer.

    Reply
    • Shane Flannagan 2

      11 years ago

      Sullivan all day lol. David Kaplan is the main guy I listen to when it comes to Cubs. He hasn’t said a word so ya

      Reply
      • Joey Doughnuts

        11 years ago

        David Kaplan is a fan first, journalist second. He often says ridiculously homerish things that get fans excited, but have no substance behind them. Sullivan is a better source.

        Reply
        • Shane Flannagan 2

          11 years ago

          Not lately, he’s got some inside with Theo. He’s been pretty good on stuff lately

          Reply
        • petrie000

          11 years ago

          he’s still a nobel prize winner compared to wittenmeyer

          Reply
          • Joey Doughnuts

            11 years ago

            I honestly don’t know enough about Wittenmeyer to have an opinion, so I’ll take your word for it.

            Reply
    • petrie000

      11 years ago

      Clash of the Titans

      though more the newer lame 3d version than the classic Harryhausen one, to be sure…

      Reply
  54. bobbybaseball

    11 years ago

    “signed to an attractive, yet pricey contract.” Can it be both?

    Reply
    • petrie000

      11 years ago

      well, it’s not cheap… but you’d be getting a proven All-Star for less per year than most of this years free agent hitter crop will go for…

      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        11 years ago

        It’s not an outrageous contract. He’s got $50M or so left, but a great option before his final season ($16M Option or $1 buyout).

        Reply
        • petrie000

          11 years ago

          all told it’s probably one of the more team friendly contracts in baseball when you consider his age, production and what it would cost to replace him on the open market.

          But he’s certainly making more than veteran minimum.

          Reply
          • mrnatewalter

            11 years ago

            It’s a moveable contract. I don’t think there’s many teams out there that would be scared away from his price tag if he were available to them.

            Reply
  55. Scott Rapponotti

    11 years ago

    Castro is way more valuable than Zimmerman. A lot of people don’t watch Castro play and realize how good this guy is. He isn’t going to win any MVPs, but a .780+ OPS with solid defense is something only like 2 teams have from a SS. Castro hasn’t even hit his peak and already one of the top 3 SS in the game. Zimmerman has one year left and will be expensive. Castro for Zimmerman straight up will be a very bad trade for the cubs. I’d say trade any 2 of 4 of Alcantara, Almora, Johnson and Edwards.

    Reply
    • Joey Doughnuts

      11 years ago

      I don’t think you know who Jordan Zimmerman is. He’d immediately become the ace of the Cubs rotation. He accrued a 5.2 WAR last season, but judging by your notion that Castro is somehow a top 3 SS in baseball, I’m assuming you aren’t privy to advanced statistics. Castro is a borderline top 10 SS. That being said, you are right about Zimmermann only have 1 year left (albeit $16M for him is a bargain). So in that respect, the team control difference between the two players makes this a plausible swap if it were to happen.

      Reply
      • ray_derek

        11 years ago

        As a Cubs fan I agree with Joeys post here more than the previous one. I like Castro, he is a good SS, but it’s not like he’s a top tier SS. Jordan Zimmerman is a beast, I don’t know why people don’t understand how good he really is. The reason I don’t understand why the Cubs would make this deal is, wait until next year to sign him, unless they can get him without giving up a lot. Washington is better off trading him in July, they will get more in return IMO, some desperate team will need SP.

        Reply
        • Joey Doughnuts

          11 years ago

          I think the Cubs absolutely need to trade either Castro or Baez. They’ve got so much SS depth and so little pitching depth that they need to trade one of their surplus INFs. They should only be trading for Zimmermann if it comes w/ an extension because the Cubs aren’t going to compete in 2015 without some serious FA signings both on the pitching side and offensively. So trading for a 1 year rental makes no sense for them. SIGNING a 1-year rental works because 2015 money doesn’t mean anything and they can flip that player for prospects like they did with Feldman.

          Reply
      • Scott Rapponotti

        11 years ago

        Castro had above .770 OPS last year. Only Peralta, Hanley and Tulo had higher ones. He is one of the top SS in baseball. And WAR isn’t the end all be all of statistics, OPS is a much better indicator. In 2013, Peralta’s defensive WAR was negative, but in 2014, all of a sudden, it’s one of the highest of all SS. That makes no sense. Using WAR to compare SS and a P is just stupid anyway. A 24 year old SS that is already a top 5 in mlb and is healthy and getting better and is cheap and until team control for 6 years is way more valuable than a pitcher that is a year away from being a FA. I don’t care if it is Zimmerman, Kershaw or Walter Johnson. No pitcher that will leave in free agency in a year is worth a 24 year old SS that already top 5 in the game, established and hasn’t hit his peak yet. I guarantee you, no GM would trade Castro for Zimmerman knowing Zimmerman will want 25 million a year and has had TWO ace years and only 3 good years in his career.

        Reply
  56. Gillberg_theGreat

    11 years ago

    Lets go Cubbies! I’m all for trading for Hamels, but not if it means giving up Kris Bryant like one site reported. I could definitely do Zimmermann for Alcantara and/or Almora

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Recent

    Blue Jays To Promote Will Robertson

    Casey Lawrence Elects Free Agency

    Diamondbacks Outright Aramis Garcia; Scott McGough Elects Free Agency

    Pirates Re-Sign Tanner Rainey To Minor League Deal

    Giants Place Matt Chapman On 10-Day Injured List

    Mariners’ Bryce Miller Out Four To Six Weeks With Elbow Inflammation

    Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is “North Of Zero”

    Diamondbacks Place Justin Martínez On IL With UCL Sprain

    Orioles Select Luis Vázquez

    Rangers To Sign Craig Kimbrel To Minor League Deal

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version