Headlines

  • Bobby Jenks Passes Away
  • Braves Release Alex Verdugo
  • Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline
  • Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim
  • Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

2016 Competitive Balance Lottery Results

By Jeff Todd | July 22, 2015 at 3:17pm CDT

The Reds have drawn the first competitive balance selection in the 2016 draft, as Cash Kruth of MLB.com reports. While the precise draft slots remain to be determined, Cincinnati will pick after the conclusion of the first round (including compensation choices).

Here is the order of the selections, which were determined by lottery between the clubs that fell among the ten smallest markets and/or the ten smallest revenue pools league-wide. Other teams that participate in revenue sharing are also eligible, but only for the second round.

Round A (selections occur after first round)

1. Reds
2. Athletics
3. Rockies
4. Diamondbacks
5. Marlins
6. Pirates

Round B (selections occur after second round)

1. Padres
2. Indians
3. Twins
4. Brewers
5. Orioles
6. Rays

These results mean that the Cardinals, Royals, and Mariners failed to receive a pick despite being eligible. With some restrictions, the picks can be traded — and increasingly have been in recent seasons. You can take a look at this year’s draft results and slot values to get an idea of the range of selections (and drafted players) that the most recent competitive balance awards ultimately represented.

Share 24 Retweet 70 Send via email0

2016 Amateur Draft Arizona Diamondbacks Baltimore Orioles Cincinnati Reds Cleveland Guardians Colorado Rockies Kansas City Royals Miami Marlins Milwaukee Brewers Minnesota Twins Oakland Athletics Pittsburgh Pirates San Diego Padres Seattle Mariners St. Louis Cardinals Tampa Bay Rays

Pirates Designate Jayson Aquino
Main
Orioles Release Wesley Wright
View Comments (37)
Post a Comment

37 Comments

  1. Matt McCarron 3

    10 years ago

    This is the worst part of the draft for me. Mostly because it doesn’t make a ton of sense. The Marlins can afford to have a 300M+ outfielder but they need a free draft pick for being a smaller market? Sorry if I don’t exactly think thats right.

    Reply
    • ilikebaseball 2

      10 years ago

      Yeah I agree at this point if any bone is to be thrown it should be they have a lottery for larger draft pools, not more picks.

      Reply
    • raef715

      10 years ago

      and i think the marlins have traded their pick both years i guess because they preferred an actual player to spending good bonus money on a draft pick.
      still seems weird that the cardinals are elgible for competitive balance picks.

      Reply
  2. snazzypants

    10 years ago

    No Cardinals? Hallelujah!

    Reply
    • Rally Weimaraner

      10 years ago

      The Astros hacked the lottery to make sure the Cards didn’t get a pick

      Reply
    • Dock_Elvis

      10 years ago

      No kidding. I’d like to know in what logical way they are among the 10 smallest markets when all things are considered.

      Reply
      • snazzypants

        10 years ago

        Well, the Cardinals have been 2nd in the league in attendance for the past 3 years, including this year, and they have a $121,824,722 payroll this year.

        Guess MLB threw logic out the window when they came up with this!

        Reply
        • baseballpun

          10 years ago

          The whole idea of this compensation system is dumb. San Diego and Oakland get compensation despite playing in 2 of the countries’ largest cities (San Jose is in there…the whole Bay Area should be large enough to support 2 teams). Giving compensation to owners who don’t spend money is a bad incentive. Giving it to teams who aren’t run well is a bad incentive. Population and (as you point out) payroll doesn’t appear to be the driving factor. Just increase the luxury tax!

          Reply
          • Dock_Elvis

            10 years ago

            I’d agree on the whole compensation pick thought…but Oakland hardly shares the bay area. Polling shows that the A’s arent even the most popular team in Alameda County

            Reply
            • baseballpun

              10 years ago

              I’m not sure popularity should be the same as market size though. Isn’t it about the pool of people you should be reasonably expected to draw from? If you’re not popular, that’s on you. Why should unpopular teams have a right to their existence (at least in that city)?

              Reply
          • AsFan89

            10 years ago

            Oakland is 90 minutes from San Jose.

            Reply
            • therealryan

              10 years ago

              You might want to try traveling a different route. According to some popular online map sites, San Jose to Oakland Coliseum is only 45 minutes.

              Reply
        • Dock_Elvis

          10 years ago

          Not to mention shared media revenue of 120m I believe…and Cardinal nation to proclaims itself globally

          Reply
  3. mrnatewalter

    10 years ago

    Glad the Cardinals don’t get a pick this year… any team that regularly makes the playoffs clearly doesn’t need the help.

    Reply
  4. Dock_Elvis

    10 years ago

    Why not a scenario where won/loss record over a certain season period is the basis for the competitive balance picks.

    Reply
    • baseballpun

      10 years ago

      Provides incentive to tank.

      Reply
      • Bronx Bombers

        10 years ago

        Maybe on the part of the front office but the players on the field have no incentive to loose games for draft picks

        Reply
        • baseballpun

          10 years ago

          Doesn’t stop NBA tanking.

          Reply
          • Dock_Elvis

            10 years ago

            NBA has more game certainty win loss wise..NBA teams immediately, benefit from drawing a lottery pick.

            Reply
      • Dock_Elvis

        10 years ago

        You’d have to seriously tank seasons for like 5 maybe…and it’d cut into most teams profits who aren’t the Cubs basically. Baseball is harder to tank than other sports. I’d put it on a lengthy average

        Reply
        • baseballpun

          10 years ago

          Fair point. I’m not sure having a bad team is the disadvantage that should be structurally addressed. Disparity in TV revenue, I would say, is unfair. Disparity in record because you draft poorly and sign too many pricey free agents is not.

          Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      10 years ago

      I think win/loss records amongst eligible teams ought to be considered… but not just win/loss records among all teams.

      No reason to give Boston a competitive balance pick when they are able to handing out $200 million worth of contracts after a down year, or anytime.

      But St. Louis definitely shouldn’t be eligible, and maybe not even KC, at least for this year.

      Reply
      • baseballpun

        10 years ago

        Two questions: (1) Is the system meant to even the playing field in lieu of a salary cap, and (2) What do we want the competitive balance system to do? If it’s meant to even the financial playing field, a team’s record should have nothing to do with its receipt of a pick. If we want the picks to help even out the play on the field, I’m not sure handing out extra picks to bad decision-makers, especially those with money (Boston, Philadelphia), is a good idea.

        Reply
  5. stl_cards16 2

    10 years ago

    No complaints on the Mariners getting a pick in this thread, even though they have a higher payroll (and going up) than the Cardinals.

    But we’re sure the only reason we complain about St. Louis getting a pick is because they’re not a small market.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      10 years ago

      Or people don’t like the Cardinals getting one because they make the playoffs year after year…

      Reply
      • stl_cards16 2

        10 years ago

        So we’re confusing success with market size? Never would have guessed.

        I don’t care if the Cardinals get one extra pick every few years, I don’t think the team will fall apart without it.

        What really needs to be done is a true revenue sharing system. The one in place is not even close to sufficient. But the large market owners would rather goofy things like this than let the small market teams cut into their pie.

        Reply
        • Dock_Elvis

          10 years ago

          All teams I believe share about $120m in media revenue. Most teams can pay an MLB roster without ever hitting their own till

          Reply
          • stl_cards16 2

            10 years ago

            That sounds pretty straight forward and simple if payrolls were the only thing teams had to pay. Also, if there wasn’t a huge difference in the local TV deals. If you don’t think the large markets have a huge advantage over small markets, you’re kidding yourself.

            Reply
            • Dock_Elvis

              10 years ago

              I think what it is at this point is the “have mores” and “have extremely mores”… Not too many teams hurting

              Reply
    • rct

      10 years ago

      It’s also hard (for me, anyway; even though it might be a weird/silly argument) to consider Seattle a small market when they’re the only team in the northwest. I get that fewer people live up there, but the closest team to Seattle is 800 miles away. There’s not much competition.

      Reply
      • blitzred1

        10 years ago

        There not though. If you read the mlb.com article, the Mariners,Twins, and Orioles and are only eligible because they receive money from revenue sharing, and they are only eligible for a second round pick. Everyone else is either there because of what is the defined market size or total revenue.

        Reply
    • therealryan

      10 years ago

      According to Forbes, the Cardinals have the 7th largest revenues in MLB at $294 million/season. What competitive disadvantage do they have exactly?

      Reply
  6. Ray Ray

    10 years ago

    Well the Reds have the best pick in the draft. They will probably try and trade the pick, but they will wait until the day of the draft just to “maximize value.”

    Reply
  7. arewhyayen

    10 years ago

    Every pick should be able to be traded along with slot bonuses. Think of all sports talk radio conversational ranking tgat could go on. It’s all about ratings and $$$$$$$

    Reply
    • raef715

      10 years ago

      especially when you have teams with a top pick that they are supposed to pay 5+ million bucks for even if there is no player worthy of that payout, like this year

      Reply
    • Dock_Elvis

      10 years ago

      The amatuer draft was instituted to help with competitive balance after the Yankees basically ran the game from the late 40’s into the late 60’s

      Reply
  8. patburn

    9 years ago

    It is a joke the Marlins are there. MLB should force their owner out.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Brandon Woodruff To Start For Brewers On Sunday

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib

    Tucker Barnhart To Retire

    Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline

    Reds Release Jeimer Candelario

    Dave Parker Passes Away

    Griffin Canning Diagnosed With Ruptured Achilles

    Pirates Reportedly Have Very Few Untouchable Players At Trade Deadline

    Recent

    Giants Activate Matt Chapman, DFA Sergio Alcantara

    Nationals Reinstate Mason Thompson From 60-Day IL

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Rangers To Sign Rowdy Tellez To Minor League Deal

    Yankees Likely To Promote Cam Schlittler

    Astros Sign Hector Neris

    Dodgers Not Planning To Add Third Base Help Before Deadline

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Blue Jays Place Yimi Garcia On 15-Day Injured List

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version