The Dodgers had a “big crew” on hand today for a showcase in the Dominican Republic where second baseman Jose Miguel Fernandez and outfielder Lazaro Armenteros auditioned for teams, tweets Ben Badler of Baseball America. The Dodgers, of course, have been the most prominent presence on the international market during the current signing period. If there’s any genuine interest in “Lazarito,” they’d need to get a deal with him completed prior to June 15, as that date signals the end of the current international signing period, and the Dodgers won’t be allowed to sign a player for more than $300K in the 2016-17 period (which begins on July 2) due to their lavish expenditures over the past 10 months. Fernandez, however, is exempt from bonus pools and, as such, can sign for any amount. Both players have been prominently linked to the division-rival Padres in recent months, with Badler reporting in early March that San Diego was the favorite to sign Lazarito. It should be noted as well, though, that Badler also downplayed the 16-year-old’s upside, writing that he’s been the beneficiary of “extreme sensationalism” in some media reports. As of that writing, Badler rated Armenteros 11th among Cuban prospects available to MLB clubs.
A few more notes on the Dodgers…
- While many Dodgers fans are wondering when Julio Urias will arrive on the scene, Dylan Hernandez of the L.A. Times writes that Urias’ agent, Scott Boras, is surprisingly supportive of the Dodgers’ decision not to rush him to the Majors. Boras says that he is “aligned” with the Dodgers in terms of Urias’ timeline. “We understand we have a great young talent,” said Boras. Hernandez writes that the plan for Urias is to only see a “modest” increase from his career-high of 87 1/3 innings this season. Hernandez opines that rather than rush Urias to the big league bullpen, the Dodgers would be better served to allow him to continue to develop as a starter, with an eye towards next year’s rotation. Never one to pass up the opportunity to make some form of statement, Boras used Urias as an example of why the upcoming wave of CBA negotiations should result in rosters expanding to 26 players. “You ideally want to bring a guy to the big leagues and have him throw 120, 130 or 140 innings, but then you have to make up 50 or 60 innings,” he said. “Having that extra pitcher throughout that whole year would allow them to do that.”
- Outfielder Scott Van Slyke, who has appeared in just four games with the Dodgers this season due to a lower back injury, could return to the team by June 3-4, manager Dave Roberts told reporters (via MLB.com’s Chad Thornburg). In the meantime, the Dodgers plan to continue carrying an extra reliever and going with a short, four-man bench. As Roberts explained, maintaining “flexibility of different guys in the ’pen is more of a priority” than having an additional bat off the bench at this time.
- Infielder/outfielder Alex Guerrero is currently on a minor league rehab assignment, and he told J.P. Hoornstra of the L.A. Daily News last week that he thinks he can help the Dodgers at the big league level once healthy. That type of talk is expected from most players, but it’s particularly notable in the case of Guerrero, who has a clause in his contract that allows him to refuse to be optioned to the minors. Guerrero entered tonight’s contest hitting just .152/.188/.239 on said rehab assignment (he did pick up his first hit with the team’s Double-A affiliate tonight), and he’ll give the Dodgers’ front office a decision when his rehab window is up. Guerrero has a $5MM salary this season (the $10MM signing bonus on his $28MM contract was reportedly paid up front) and will earn the same in 2017, though a clause in his deal allows him to become a free agent at the end of a season in which he’s traded. The 29-year-old has been a disappointment thus far in the contract, hitting just .224/.251/.414 in 243 plate appearances while displaying questionable defensive skills.
Re: Dodgers calling up Urias
it’s better to call him up late, than early. Would like for the Dodgers to avoid the “mistake” the Twins made w/ Buxton in calling him up a bit to early.
I think the difference is Urias is ready performance wise unlike Buxton who hasn’t really been on track due to injuries. The one thing I worry about is wasting two years by rushing him. He’s finally being stretched out so let him get above 87 innings. Towards the end they can acclimate him to the pen before they call him up for the stretch run. Especially since the Dodgers still have Montas and Rhame that they need to see first.
The main issue with Urias is despite the fact that he’s already spent a lot of time in the minors he’s still just a teenager. Expecting him to have the body development needed to withstand the work level required for him to make it in the majors is a tall order. Better to keep him in the minors get him a couple of MLB starts in September.
If I was a Cuban I would avoid the Dodgers like the plague. Puig notwithstanding, the Dodgers don’t exactly have the best record with Cubanos Guerrero never really got a full chance and lost an ear to a teammate and Arruhubbabubba has been suspended for the season two years in a row.
Hector Olivera too
$$$$ all that matters
I agree Dodgers do treat some folks different but yet they throw money out there like candy to this poor kids
Yeah, the moment they drink the water in LA they go nuts. Watch out for the unicorns!
jajajajaja loooool go Dodgers!!!!!
What water? Lol, just kidding
We don’t need no stinking water.
Assuming Urias’ contract allows him to go through the normal MLB service time procedure, it makes perfect sense that Boras doesnt want him to ever take the field as a reliever. Probably doesnt want his client to wind up in a situation like Joba or Papelbon (although he made good money). A decent starter makes the same or better money than a great closer.
As far as service time goes, he’s got plenty because he signed at age 16. The issue for him is chronological age.
When he signed is irrelevant, his service clock starts when he’s called up
Not really. Eventually he’d run out his minor league contract too. Five years I believe. Not that the Dodgers are going to keep him in the minors for that long.
Just checked and FWIW the MLB Uniform Minor League Contract runs for seven years.
It is 5 years to be added to the 40 man or be subjected to rule 5. 6 or 7 to obtain free agency.
That makes sense, thanks for the info.
Oh ok, I misunderstood what you were referring to. He certainly won’t be exposed to the Rule V draft, but he obviously doesn’t have to be recalled just because he’s added on the 40-man. If he continues dominating in OKC though, it shouldn’t matter all that much
Absolutely.
Boras’ point is that he wants to take Urias out to market as a FA with as few innings on his arm as possible. Dodgers view should be the opposite. Get as much out of him as you can. That means letting him stay in the minors this year to build up arm strength. Assuming he can go 160-180 innings next year, you hold him back in the minors to avoid Super Two status. Then you bring him up and use him as hard as you can for the next 6 years – 200 innings plus per year. He’s then a FA at age 26.
But if he’s as good as advertised, they’ll want to retain him past his FA years, and we all know they have enough money to. It wouldn’t make much sense to squeeze out the max amount of innings if they want to keep him past age 26
If this FO is still in charge, the first scenario is more likely than yours.
As much as I would love it there is no possible way he gets to 160-180 next year. At most he get to 115-120 this year. I can see 150 maybe next year but that’s at the highest end of the spectrum.