The Diamondbacks are re-signing Zac Gallen on a one-year deal, pending a physical. The Boras Corporation client technically receives a $22.025MM guarantee that matches the value of the qualifying offer which he declined in November. However, a reported $14MM will be deferred via five $2.8MM installments paid between 2031-35. That means the D-Backs will only pay a little over $8MM, one-third of the contract, this year. They’ll need to open 40-man roster spots for Gallen and Paul Sewald once those deals are official but have no shortage of candidates to go on the 60-day injured list.
Gallen is coming off a down year that clearly sapped a lot of his appeal on the open market. He entered the season as a strong candidate to command upwards of $100MM once he hit free agency. Gallen stayed healthy and took all 33 turns through the rotation, but he had the worst rate stats of his career. He turned in a personal-high 4.83 earned run average with a career-worst 21.5% strikeout rate.
The season started especially poorly, as Gallen allowed at least five earned runs per nine innings in each of the first four months. He took a 5.40 ERA into the All-Star Break and had a 5.60 mark across 127 innings at the trade deadline. The D-Backs were aggressive sellers, moving Josh Naylor, Eugenio Suárez, Merrill Kelly and Shelby Miller. They didn’t find an offer they liked on Gallen more than the draft pick they’d collect if he signed elsewhere after rejecting the qualifying offer.
Arizona reportedly was concerned about overworking young pitchers down the stretch, so they got some benefit out of holding Gallen for the innings alone. He performed better after the deadline, tossing quality starts in eight of his last 11 outings. The 30-year-old turned in a 3.32 ERA over his final 65 innings. The Diamondbacks went 7-4 in those games, part of the reason they were able to hang in the Wild Card picture until the final weekend despite the July selloff.
While it was an encouraging last couple months, it wasn’t exactly a return to peak form. Gallen only struck out 20% of opponents during that stretch. He was helped a lot by a .232 average on balls in play. Gallen had struck out between 25-29% of opponents in each of his first five-plus MLB seasons. The swing-and-miss drop wasn’t quite so extreme on a per-pitch basis, but last year’s 9.5% swinging strike rate was the second-lowest mark of his career.
There weren’t any dramatic changes to Gallen’s raw stuff. His fastball averaged 93.5 mph, right in line with his career mark. That’s essentially league average for a right-handed starting pitcher. Opponents have had increasing success against Gallen’s heater over the past couple seasons. He managed decent results on his knuckle-curve and changeup, his top two secondary offerings. He sporadically mixed a cutter, slider and sinker — all of which were hit hard.
It remains to be seen if they’ll make any changes to his arsenal going into 2026. Gallen began to scale back his four-seam fastball usage in the final few months last season, largely in favor of more changeups. In any case, the team probably feels he deserved a little better than a near-5.00 ERA would suggest. Statcast’s “expected” ERA, which is based on his strikeout/walk profile and the batted balls he allows, landed at 4.28. His 4.24 SIERA was in a similar range. A positive regression toward those metrics would make him a league average starter.
This is an ideal outcome for the Diamondbacks. They were willing to pay an upfront $22.025MM salary to retain Gallen in November. His decision to decline the QO may very well have opened the payroll room to bring Kelly back on a two-year, $40MM free agent deal. Team personnel maintained throughout the offseason that they’d like to retain Gallen if they could make it work financially.
Owner Ken Kendrick raved about Gallen as far back as September. “He’s a special young man who spent nearly seven years as a D-Back. He definitely had an up-and-down season — performed better in the later part of the year, certainly, than earlier in the year. … He’s loved being a Diamondback,” Kendrick said at the time. “I don’t want to say it’s out of the touch of reality that we’d work out an arrangement to bring him back. He’s been a great D-Back. Last I recall, he was the guy who pitched seven or eight innings of no-hit ball in a World Series game for the Arizona Diamondbacks. … He’s the guy you want to root for.”
Just this week, manager Torey Lovullo said the clubhouse would “would welcome him with open arms, certainly” if they could get a deal done. Now that it has come to pass, he’ll slot alongside Kelly, Ryne Nelson, Eduardo Rodriguez and Brandon Pfaadt in the projected rotation. That could push free agent pickup Michael Soroka into a long relief role unless they decide to run a six-man rotation. They’re without a true ace until Corbin Burnes makes it back from Tommy John surgery; he’s aiming for some time around the All-Star Break. There’s far more stability than they had at the beginning of the winter, allowing them to take their time in deciding when to bring up prospects like Mitch Bratt and Kohl Drake, both of whom they acquired from Texas in the Kelly trade.
Penciling in a $22.025MM salary for Gallen would bring Arizona’s payroll projection to roughly $194MM, as calculated by RosterResource. That’d technically be right in line with last year’s $195MM season-opening mark, which Kendrick said at the beginning of the winter that the team wouldn’t match. However, they’re reportedly only on the hook for around $8MM in salary payments this year, so the D-Backs didn’t need to dramatically stretch the budget after waiting out the offseason.
The Diamondbacks don’t forfeit any of their existing draft choices to re-sign their own qualified free agent. Any other team would have punted at least one draft choice and potentially international signing bonus pool space to sign him. They are indirectly losing a pick by forfeiting the right to compensation.
That selection would have come after the first round in 2026 if Gallen had signed elsewhere for at least $50MM. That seemed a distinct possibility early in the offseason but almost certainly wasn’t happening in the middle of February. It’s more likely that they’re passing on a compensation pick that would have landed 73rd or 74th overall, which they receive if he’d walked for less than $50MM. That’s not a huge cost compared to bringing back a potential mid-rotation starter on a favorable deal.
Although the team must be happy with the outcome, it’s undoubtedly not what Gallen envisioned for his first trip to free agency. Jon Heyman of The New York Post suggests he declined multi-year offers from other teams because he preferred to remain with the Diamondbacks. That doesn’t mean that the market didn’t materialize as hoped. MLBTR predicted a four-year, $80MM deal at the beginning of the offseason. It seems clear in retrospect that teams weren’t willing to go to those lengths given Gallen’s disappointing platform year.
Even if staying in Arizona was his first choice all along, he’s coming out quite a bit worse than if he’d accepted the qualifying offer. He’ll receive the same amount of money in the long run, but the true value of the deferred money is worth less than if he’d collected it all in 2026. John Gambadoro of Arizona Sports reports that the net present value will land in the $12-13MM range for competitive balance tax purposes. That probably doesn’t mean much for the team — they would’ve been more than $20MM away from the CBT threshold in either case — but illustrates that there’s a significant gap between the QO and this contract.
Gallen did at least agree to terms within a couple days of camps opening. Assuming he takes his physical at some point during the weekend, he’ll report to the team by the beginning of full squad workouts and should have plenty of time to be ready for Opening Day. One can imagine he didn’t want to wait until close to the regular season, as former teammate Jordan Montgomery did in 2024. Montgomery was very critical of how Boras had managed negotiations and switched agencies within two weeks of signing with the D-Backs. The lefty pitched poorly in ’24, then underwent Tommy John surgery last spring. He signed a $1.25MM deal with Texas this week and wound up making $48.75MM over three seasons from 2024-26.
There’s certainly a world where things work out well for Gallen in the long run. He’ll return to the open market at age 31 without being weighed down by draft compensation. A player can only receive the qualifying offer once in his career. A four- or five-year deal could be on the table if he rebounds to the form he showed in 2022-24: a 3.20 ERA and 26% strikeout rate over 93 starts. Blake Snell, Cody Bellinger, Pete Alonso and Matt Chapman are all Boras clients who found disappointing markets in one offseason and went on to much more lucrative contracts after bounce back performances.
Time will tell if Gallen can follow the same path. His immediate focus will be on trying to get Arizona to a playoff berth in an annually difficult NL West. Gallen was the last unsigned qualified free agent and arguably the last potential impact player available. Lucas Giolito, Max Scherzer, Zack Littell and Griffin Canning headline a dwindling free agent class.
Steve Gilbert of MLB.com first reported the D-Backs were nearing a deal with Gallen. Nick Piecoro of The Arizona Republic reported it was a one-year contract. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reported it was a $22.025MM guarantee with roughly $14MM in deferrals. John Gambadoro of Arizona Sports added details on the deferral payouts.
Image courtesy of Rick Scuteri, Imagn Images.


What a shocker
Less than QO?
Exact match to QO in order to assuage his ego. $14M or so deferred so he lost money not taking the offer from the start.
3 free agents left on the contest. Littell, Scherzer and Giolito.
I think the only thing jamming up Giolito is his injury history. He’s coming off a better season than Gallen.
Deferred money!! Ruining Baseball!
Why?
Every team has the same option.
Are you jealous of teams that decide to use it?
To be honest I could care less which teams do or don’t use deferred money because eventually they will have to pay the piper.
I think he is joking on this one.
I blame Nutting. Been deferring money for 20 years until he had Skenes Bubba KG Ashcraft.
Who is KG
Konnor Griffin. If you don’t know him good chance you will next few years months weeks.
Kevin Garnett, taking a shot at baseball now.
I would pay good money to see Kevin Garnett play baseball. XD
Yes some people don’t sense sarcasm well.
Nice to see Zac Gallen resign with the Diamondbacks
The pick crushed his market elsewhere
Of course
Good for the Dbacks keeping Gallen in the desert.
Enters camp sheepishly, without much eye contact.
Ha ha ha. One of your best !
Definitely makes them better. Hope he doesn’t continue a spiral downwards. If he is good they contend for a wildcard. If not they are much more fringe.
I figured when the Orioles didn’t sign Gallen and signed Bassitt signed with the Orioles…Gallen was going back
Dbacks lose the comp pick they would have gotten, but at this point the chances of him getting a $50m+ contract were small anyway.
“Dbacks lose the comp”..You can’t really “lose” something you never really had or were never guaranteed to have.
The Dbacks have tried as hard as any team in MLB to be competitive these last few years and lets all hope their injury luck begins to even out.
As it was meant to be
Anxious to see the terms. Other teams weren’t going to give up a pick for one year of Gallen, but the Dbacks are managing their salaries closely this season. Felt like Gallen didn’t have a ton of leverage at this point.
I’m sure that was humbling, but it seems like there have been a lot of people who get messed up when they skip/rush spring training by signing late. This is a good decision for him long term.
Very little leverage. He wasn’t going to get a better deal elsewhere. Another example of the QO really effecting someone. I was surprised at the beginning of the off-season how many players accepted them but it may have been the best decision for all of them.
What set him back his how he pitched last year
Performance and QO both dictated how he was going to do. Performance probably more yes. But having to give up picks for a guy who looks anything but a sure bet doesn’t help.
Imanaga was smart, very similar boat with his performance.
Woodruff surprised me but he also has health concerns.
Grisham probably made the right call.
No idea why the Tigers offered Gleybor a QO.
I think out of all of those players Woodruff would have done best.
Gallen was a borderline QO guy. He would have been a no brainer based on performance prior to 2025. He was so off last season that he had to settle for less than the QO. That largely based on his terrible 2025 season.
Will they offer him the equivalent of the QO he declined?
Hopefully less
Less would be great.
It was equal
Same amount as the QO, but with deferrals makes it more budget friendly in this coming year for the Dbacks.
Joe Buzas? Should I know who that is??
Yes and no. Total amount of QO but wonder what the deferrals make the actual value?
Not mention inflation reducing the value of future dollars. The article didn’t mention anything about interest on the deferrals.
@dmp
The CBA doesn’t allow for the player to earn interest on the deferred money but the team saves money on their end.
Sweet! Finally they get it done. This is where he wants to be.
He’ll be a free agent next year with no pick attached. And he has a chance to pitch better this year than last which will help his market.
Also has a chance to pitch worse, but no pick will definitely help.
It would be pretty hard to pitch worse, but even if he did he wouldn’t have comp attached so he would likely find a better market unless he is in the fives showing serious inability to limit the long ball again.
Dynamite work Monty
I was hoping for this outcome all along. Best of luck Zac!
Rooting for guy to not get paid what he wanted and having to crawl back to Arizona lil different but glad you got the result you wanted.
I wanted to see him back in Arizona. He probably should have taken the QO in the first place. If he signs somewhere else, he probably takes less money. This isn’t a terrible outcome for Gallen earnings wise.
@AI GM
That sounds a bit personal. Every year there are free agents left standing without chairs when the music stops playing. This year it was Gallen. You’ve got to play the game and take the risk if you wanna get paid. He made a poor bet but I doubt he’s losing any sleep over his decision.
@YBC Nothing personal for me. 1 million or 1 billion I don’t don’t care what he gets paid. I was just poking a lil fun. Like Don was hoping for that but I knew what Don meant. Guess it hiflew over your head.
Wow definitely great news!
I’m guessing 1/15
Pretty classy move by AZ, even it was pretty much on their terms. Pulling for a nice comeback for Gallen. Now go fire your agent.
$22 M but 14M is deferred.
So, basically, it took him all winter to accept the QO
Only QO’s don’t an option for deferred money.
Only cheaper this year for the team, kind of a win win
technically its less money for him as by the time he is paid $22M will be worth less. (Inflation, etc)
So it is my understanding that the player gives his “OK” to have salary deferred, it’s not stipulated or mandated by the team ? So a team cannot say “you’re getting deferred money no matter what.”
Ignorant capable of understanding
Deferrals can be proposed and accepted/rejected by either side. Ohtani’s camp suggested his contract structure.
I love it when a plan comes together!
Splendid
It’s a reasonable gamble for the team without the burden of one of those 2 or 3 year deals with opt outs. If he performs well, it’s a win for the team regardless of what he does in 2027. If he’s just adequate, then it’s a controllable limited loss. He miscalculated, but ends up only slightly worse off–he’s a year older, but won’t get the QO a second time. He’ll also be tradable if he’s doing well, so value can be recouped.
For his sake, hopefully it wasn’t the pressure of pitching in a free agent year that led to his down 2025, since he’ll be in the same boat again this year.
Caving to pressure is better than needing arm surgery or declining talent.
I think he’s just declining.
Raw numbers don’t agree. From watching him pitch every game last year, IMO it was his head – he couldn’t understand why the pitches he made the year before weren’t getting the same result. Hopefully he adjusts with a different mix or use of his pitches, his fastball speed and other metrics as noted in this article were the same last year.
His peripherals and surface level stats have both been declining for several years now.
Hopefully he takes to heart that he is pitching for his next contract and focuses on being his best and pitches great.
If he pitches the same as 2025 or worse, he won’t see a $20M AAV contract next off-season even if he isn’t tied to draft compensation.
Should have done that last year then
Costs them less than QO with deferrals, tidy.
Bridge contract for next year without the qo attached to him.
Good for both parties. Especially if he has a plus year.
Strike out decline bigger issue than QO imo. That and he might have asked for too much early on.
Red flags everywhere and the Snakes saw it firsthand. I would have stuck to the plan and moved on after he declined the QO. Can still move him at the deadline if their season torpedoes and he still has value.
Could be a arm injury coming but if not it’s a fair enough price for 1 year.
Since they did see it firsthand. They must believe his problem is fixable.
If he pitches exactly the same as 2025 it’s still a contract you would be fine with. Hurt or gets worse then not the case.
Makes sense to bring him back on a one year deal, no one was biting despite his track record. However, for a team really ramping it up to compete, their bullpen is hideous. I don’t understand why it’s so neglected? That will likely de-rail any shot they have to compete.
No one was biting because of his track record, not despite it. The QO, along with his declining numbers over the last 2-3 seasons, made it difficult for teams to lose a draft pick, on what amounts to a bounce back candidate.
I would have taken the QO. Least they were nice to give him the same number even though deferred. Would have preferred draft pick I imagine but 1 year deal good runner up.
Good for the Diamondbacks. They’re not catching the Dodgers but this signing could further separate them from their other competitors in the NL West.
The Padres and Giants haven’t dome much this offseason. The former has had financial constraints while the latter’s moves haven’t made much sense. The Giants had money to spend and needed more quality SP depth but failed to pursue Framber Valdez, Merrill Kelly or Zac Gallen in free agency. Arizona now has the latter two back in the fold.
The Diamondbacks wild card could be Corbin Burnes in July. That’s his self proclaimed ETA and could give Arizona a huge boost for their chances at…a wild card spot. 🙂
AZ was worse than both SD and SF last year. It’s true SF didn’t do a lot, and neither did SD, but AZ is running it back with basically the same team as last season minus Naylor and Suarez. The bullpen is not good. They’re projected for 4th in the NLW and I don’t see that being wrong.
Three straight years is ERA has gone up
Not a good trend
I think he is overpaid
I’m not sure why he thought he would get a 3 year deal, or why he thought teams were going to give up draft pick(s) to sign him to a 1 or 2 year deal. Imanaga figured that out and accepted the QO from the Cubs, Gallen should have done the same.
That’s easy to say in hindsight but he’s 30 with a career ERA+ of 119 in 1000 IP. Most players this good in his position would take the free agent route. It just didn’t work out for him this offseason.
Imanga is 32 and had made about $11M in his previous NPB eight-year career.
Dbacks should be getting a humbled, motivated version of Gallen in ’26. That said, he was motivated last year heading into free agency and struggled mightily. At the end of the day, the Dbacks need innings and, hopefully, Gallen will deliver another 30+ starts.
$22.5 million isn’t THAT humbling
Even $10 million is fifty years times $200,000.
That’s a lifetime of earnings for many of us.
– – –
I am sure that there was a team ready to offer him three years at ten million a year. But they did not want to give up a pick for one or two years, so this deal was the end result.
Well another strikeout for me (whiff) on the free agent contest. Been stuck at 9 since Realmuto signed.
I am at 14. Still upset at myself for not picking Grisham to Yankees. Would not have won anyway.
Who won the Gallen-Chisholm trade? I still don’t know.
Diamondbacks, without him they don’t make the 2023 World Series.
Here’s to hoping the Dbacks clinch at least a wild card!
He should have waited until after the draft.
That’s a massive win for Arizona. They’re only paying ~$8M in real 2026 cash and they avoided surrendering a comp pick by keeping him.
Now we’ll see if Gallen can recover so he could re-enter free agency next winter without a QO attached.
They would have gained—not lost— a comp pick if Gallen signed elsewhere. Teams get the comp pick when their FA turns down the QO and signs w/another team. C’mon York…..you know this!
@NashvilleJeff
Yes, but they signed a FA that had the QO attached to him but since they resigned him, they don’t have to surrender any comp because he’s signing with the same team. I think it’s just the wording that is confusing.
Yeah, they don’t have to surrender a pick to re-sign their own FA that they issued a QO to. They also don’t gain a comp pick because another team didn’t sign their FA w/his attached QO. Lol.
Have to like it for that price. Decent chance they can flip him for a better prospect than the expected value of the 73rd pick in the draft if they fall out of contention.
Yo his market clearly tanked
If he does well and the team isn’t in it, he can be a trade deadline candidate and get them that pick they missed out on with the QO.
If they are in it, it was likely a good pickup.
So glad the Padres didn’t sign him. Not bc of his quality, but the QO made it a bad choice with loss of picks, a thin system and poor odds for upcoming season even with him. Do your draft magic AJP.
I like
L
O
L.
He must feel pretty silly right now, huh?
From everything I am reading, the Diamondbacks were the only team that made Gallen a firm offer and even then it was only for the QO amount. Everyone else was scared off by the QO hanging over his head.
Wonder if he considered taking QO but Boras takes him out of it.
I guess this is the equivalent of Scott Boras running back to the D-Backs with his tail between his legs. After the year Gallen just had, Boras gave him terrible advice. Should have taken the Qualifying offer.
While it’s less than $22M present day $$ due to the deferrals, I would have liked to see the player suffer real consequences in financial terms, like if the best offer was from a team that said
“It’s February and you’re unsigned. So if we’re giving up a high draft pick, to sign you, you’re getting a $12 million, one-year deal and we want a club option for a second season at $20M.”
When/if Burnes comes back around the All-Star break, the Dbacks will finally have the pitching staff/starters envisioned last year. With a rotation of
1. Burnes
2. Gallen
3. Kelly
4. Nelson
5. Pfaadt
BUT, will Burnes successfully come back from TJS?
Will Gallen successfully be the pitcher he was in ‘21-‘24?
Will Pfaadt get back to his ceiling?
Will Kelly age well?
Will Nelson continue his development?
And will all of them be healthy in ‘26?