Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On Giants, Pablo Sandoval

By Jeff Todd | November 26, 2016 at 10:21pm CDT

SATURDAY: Contrary to Drellich’s report, the Giants have not talked about reacquiring Sandoval, according to Chris Haft of MLB.com. General manager Bobby Evans expects Nunez to serve as the team’s primary third baseman next year and is focusing his efforts on finding a closer, writes Haft. While club executives aren’t allowed to publicly discuss acquiring players who are under contract elsewhere, Evans did address the Sandoval situation, telling Haft, “I’m not aware of any consideration of a reunion, but we’ll never forget all that he meant to the Giants organization.”

FRIDAY: The Giants have had internal discussions about trying to strike a deal for Red Sox third baseman Pablo Sandoval, according to Evan Drellich of the Boston Herald. It is not known whether the two organizations have talked about the former San Francisco star.

Sandoval, 30, is two years into what has been a disastrous free agent contract with the Red Sox. Entering the 2014-15 offseason, he was widely regarded as a high-quality option at the hot corner, with youth on his side and a resume full of strong contributions with the bat and the glove. The Giants pursued a reunion, but Sandoval ultimately took five years and $95MM to head east.

The productivity came to an end as soon as he reached Boston, however. Sandoval posted a decidedly mediocre .245/.292/.366 batting line in his first season with his new organization, and drew abysmal reviews for his fielding at the hot corner. He lost his starting job in camp heading into 2016, and ultimately underwent season-ending shoulder surgery.

Beyond Sandoval’s age and track record, there’s not much to commend him at this point. He has notably struggled with his weight before, but it has been a greater problem than ever with the Red Sox, and it’s hard to know what to make of the latest reports that he is in better shape. And now, Sandoval has the shoulder issue to work back from, too.

Still, the Giants have drawn good work from Sandoval in the past. While his contract is very clearly under water, he’s hardly owed a monumental sum. Including the buyout on a 2020 option, Sandoval is set to earn $58MM over the next three seasons. While there’s no chance that San Francisco will take that on in full, it’s not impossible to imagine the sides coming to a meeting of the minds.

[RELATED: Red Sox and Giants Depth Charts]

The Giants do have Eduardo Nunez and Conor Gillaspie on hand to cover third, neither is clearly an everyday option there, and both could be put to use elsewhere. Interestingly, though, the Red Sox probably have the greater need at the position. Travis Shaw and Brock Holt are under team control, and Yoan Moncada could be the long-term solution, but it’s an area in flux at present with Sandoval still a question mark.

Share 0 Retweet 38 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox San Francisco Giants Pablo Sandoval

Cafardo’s Latest: CBA, V-Mart, Encarnacion, Cespedes, Chapman, Nats, Marlins
Main
Pat Dean Signs With Korea’s Kia Tigers
View Comments (235)
Post a Comment

235 Comments

  1. McGlynnandjuice

    9 years ago

    They can pay his contract and have Crick

    Reply
  2. hooligan

    9 years ago

    please for the love of jesus christ himself, no.

    Reply
    • benharvey26

      9 years ago

      Lol

      Reply
    • downeysoft42

      9 years ago

      No no have him go for it!

      Reply
      • SFgiantsUK

        9 years ago

        You know I wasn’t sad to see him go to BOS, even though he had his hand in all the 3 rings.

        Maybe he is like a Good-Luck-Charm. Plus SF does need a power bat off the bench.

        In the event required to play 3B or 1B he could do that.

        If BOS eat into the contract a little or helpfully a lot, and they take basically nobodies, I am not against the idea of Panda returning. He won’t be my starting 3B; at the moment that’s Nunez.

        I am just saying having Panda if healthy and on the cheap is seemingly a good idea.

        It can be the difference between a divisional championship or a wild card playoff game. I would rather have the security of a divisional championship.

        Reply
    • angie

      9 years ago

      PLEASE , for the love OF GOD, YES

      Reply
  3. Michael Macaulay-Birks

    9 years ago

    Best case scenario for everybody, I remember one Boston find him there were a lot of Giants fans upset….sometimes cult hero status doesn’t translate from city to city

    Reply
    • Michael Macaulay-Birks

      9 years ago

      Damn auto correct

      Reply
  4. mjmgarv

    9 years ago

    lol

    Reply
  5. aceofrainbows

    9 years ago

    GIANTS, DON’T EVEN THINK ABOUT IT. Nunez is so much better than panda. Plus pablo is much too expensive.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      9 years ago

      Depends on how much of his contract the Red Sox would have to cover. If the Giants can get him at 8 or 9M a year, isn’t it worth a flyer? They like Sandoval and always seemed to get the best out of him.

      Reply
      • eilexx

        9 years ago

        $9M a year for a guy whose OPS+ was 75 in his last full season, and who plays horrid defense? You’d basically be paying for nostaglia, and that doesn’t win games. Sandoval is finished, and unless he’s absolutely free—meaning BoSox cut him and SF can sign him to a minimum deal and not give anyone up—there’s no reason to go anywhere near him.

        Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          9 years ago

          So you’re saying that one year, when he was overweight and out of shape, carries more weight than his 6 full seasons in SF when he averaged an OPS+ of 124? The difference between his time in Boston and SF was that the Giants were smart enough to have him on a weight regime. I’m not sold the idea, but a Sandoval on a weight regime would be a bargain at $9m a year.

          I can think of plenty of problems, and doubt the Giants could get the Sox to cover half his salary, but a still young Sandoval, his weight under control, at a reasonable salary isn’t one of them.

          Reply
        • hopper15

          9 years ago

          lol The weight regime lasted half a season before he put back on the weight. He’s always out of shape for the most part.

          Reply
        • eilexx

          9 years ago

          “So you’re saying that one year, when he was overweight and out of shape, carries more weight than his 6 full seasons in SF when he averaged an OPS+ of 124?”

          Wow, talk about selective memory there. Sandoval had two seasons above 124OPS+ (’09, ’11), and in his other 5 full seasons (w/SF & Bos) his OPS+ is barely above league average (around 106). Yes, he was a fan favorite in SF, did some special things in October, but Sandoval is finished, and as I said earlier the only way ANY team should consider him is at absolute zero cost (prospects & money).

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          9 years ago

          “Wow, talk about selective memory there.”

          Seriously? Try not to manipulate stats to make them say what you want. And if you know the history you wold know Sandoval was a very productive hitter from 2011 until 2014. when he was on a weight regimen. The history you’re apparently ignoring is that 2010, the year he was benched for being overweight was also the catalyst that drove the Giants to take control. The difference between the Giants focus on,and the Sox lack of concern for the weight dictates that his Red Sox stats should not be combined with his SF stats. It’s like home/road stats for the Rockies in that he performs much better when on a weight regimen

          2014 was his worst year of that productive 4 year span and he put up an OPS+ of 111 that year. Over those 4 years, on the weight regimen, he averaged a 125 OPS+ Maybe you think thats barely above league average, but just about every GM in baseball would disagree.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          9 years ago

          “The weight regime lasted half a season before he put back on the weight. He’s always out of shape for the most part.”

          That’s not only incorrect, it’s totally false. The Giants put Sandoval on a weight regimen following his benching in 2010 when he was too overweight to contribute. That weight regimen lasted the 4 years he remained a Giant. His weight fluctuated somewhat over that time abut he was still a very productive hitter averaging a 125 OPS+. Overall his weight did not detract from his play and there was even talk of a possible gold glove in 2011 since his defense was excellent.that year. He had 14 DRS, and a 19.3 UZR/150,

          Boston was not stupid in giving Sandoval 5/95. Other teams wanted him as well. Where the Sox were stupid was investing that much money, in a contract that long, without protecting themselves from tendencies that weren’t a secret to anyone.

          Reply
      • stamper

        9 years ago

        If the Giants can get away paying him no more than 5 million/year….otherwise it’s a waste of time.

        Reply
    • bernbabybern

      9 years ago

      “Nunez is so much better than Panda.”

      Things you thought you would never hear.

      Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      9 years ago

      Nunez isn’t very good bro. At all.

      Reply
      • stl_cards16 2

        9 years ago

        He didn’t say Nunez was any good.

        Reply
        • pukelit

          9 years ago

          Nunez isn’t bad though, and he’s way better than Panda.

          Reply
      • dbacksrs

        9 years ago

        Nunez stole 40 bases and had a .288 average on the year. That’s respectable.

        Reply
        • SFgiantsUK

          9 years ago

          Nunez had his career year in 2016, presently even if Panda on board. He is SFs starting 3B. He may not get 40 SBs, I think he can manage 30 SBs and be driven in my the heart of the order 80/90 times

          Reply
  6. thebare

    9 years ago

    Pando need to go back to SF but two. Of that 3 years must be paid by Red Sox they can have a minor league pitcher from A league

    Reply
  7. jgoods06

    9 years ago

    Please take him. Will take your worst triple A player for him

    Reply
    • Connorsoxfan

      9 years ago

      Or single A.

      Reply
  8. Solaris611

    9 years ago

    I can’t even see him as a depth piece at this point. What is Evans smoking?

    Reply
  9. User 4245925809

    9 years ago

    Funny part of the article was comparing that lazy bum Sandoval to both John lackey and Porcello.. Sandoval has always been lazy, where lackey was one of the fiercest competitors in the game. pitched the entire 2011 season with a torn UCL and in severe pain, yet didn’t complain, nor let anyone know until the season was over.

    Porcello is nearly as tough. Nobody dares speak to him between innings, or day of his starts. Sandoval? HA! He’s probably eating between innings. no self control.

    Fits the whole San Francisco area profile to a “T”.

    Reply
    • The_Thrill_22

      9 years ago

      Masshole

      Reply
    • A'sfaninUK

      9 years ago

      Why do you equate having a weight problem with being “lazy”?

      If Sandoval was white would you have used that word? Nope. It’s never the white guys who are lazy, huh?

      Name literal instances where Sandoval was lazy, or GTFO with this racist post.

      Reply
      • mrnatewalter

        9 years ago

        You were the one to make it about race, and yet he’s racist?

        Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          I’ll stop making it about race when I start seeing white players called lazy. Deal?

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          You can’t spin something into race just because he’s insulting a black man. If Pablo was white, we’d all feel the same about him. Thankfully, there is only one Pablo. Two would crush the planet.

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          Just another fan u said u had a deal if I prove one white player called lazy Kevin youklis by Bobby valentine ask Dustin pedroia media was all over that one. So maybe you can now take your blinders off and discuss baseball players like the rest of us and realize he is lazy. Lazy in the kitchen which gets in the way of what he could actually be always has.

          Reply
        • petfoodfella

          9 years ago

          dear lord, that’s your benchmark for racism?

          Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          9 years ago

          That benchmark will change when it is suddenly inconvenient to him. That’s the thing about guys like him, they are invisible and moving goal posts. But they’ll be the first to call you names because you don’t understand their mysterious standards.

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          The benchmark will change when non-white players start getting treated fairly by the media, by not using these absurdly disrespectful “lazy” tags thrown on nearly-always non-white players.

          You all can either quit calling players who have been pro athletes their entire careers “lazy”; or start calling out white players more for it. Option 1 is best.

          It also is just so stupid to call someone who has worked their entire life and beat out thousands of competitors for a job “lazy”.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          @JAF, Youkilis and Billy Butler. Learn how to read bud.

          Reply
        • angie

          9 years ago

          your words are stupid

          Reply
        • STL11in11

          9 years ago

          Bryce Harper was benched in 2014 for not hustling and it was all over the media …

          Reply
        • RenoChris

          9 years ago

          I’ve never heard one person refer to Billy Butler as lazy. His numbers suck but everyone loves “country breakfast”

          Reply
        • takeyourbase

          9 years ago

          Billy Butler

          Reply
        • takeyourbase

          9 years ago

          It was even reported on this very site

          Reply
      • 24TheKid

        9 years ago

        Go find a hate group to join. All I see you doing is calling people losers and now YOUR the one bringing race into this. And yeah if a white guy is as gifted as Sandoval and is just ruining his body and wasting talent yes He would be called lazy. You don’t need to be calling anyone you disagree with a loser or racist.

        Reply
        • Jizz Chasholm

          9 years ago

          JAF isn’t the problem here, not at all

          Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          9 years ago

          Calling him a racist when the poster made zero mentions of the respective individuals’ race is exactly why we have such problems in our country.

          So yes, JAF is very much PART of the problem.

          Reply
        • Jizz Chasholm

          9 years ago

          What I got out of his post was that he was making a homophobic reference to the San Francisco area by saying Pablo fit that area to a “T”. Unless he was calling San Fran area lazy although I don’t get the reference to that.

          Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          9 years ago

          There was a homophobic reference made?

          I don’t like johnsilver’s post in the slightest, but you can’t take your inference and pin it on him. It’s not his fault you are searching for things to call homophobic or racist (in JAF’s case).

          Reply
        • largeunit

          9 years ago

          *YOU’RE

          Reply
        • stl_cards16 2

          9 years ago

          So what would “fits the whole San Francisco are profile to a T” mean?

          Is he saying the whole area likes to eat? I’m guessing not. It’s a terrible post(at best) or an offensive post by a frequent terrible poster.

          Reply
        • User 4245925809

          9 years ago

          I was NOT being racist, another poster brought that nonsense up.

          i just listed 2 examples of players who had poor seasons, then came back strong. Sandoval was declining over several seasons, came to camp really out of shape, very fat, even busted his belt the 1st spring with Boston during workouts (fact) and mad no effort to lose any weight until after July of 2016.

          I call that lazy by any book. Double that right after signing such a large contract. A lazy and fat contract sitter.

          Reply
        • mike156

          9 years ago

          You also added, “Fits the whole San Francisco area profile to a “T”.. That’s not racist, but pretty clearly you have an agenda beyond baseball. You would have to, because the Giants have won three of the last seven World Series. Johnsilver–you are a smart guy who knows his baseball. Why not stick to it?

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          Busting your belt has nothing to do about being lazy, you really do need to stop putting your foot in your mouth.

          And yes, the “non-white guy getting called lazy but white guys never getting called lazy” is ABSOLUTELY a horrifically-tolerated racist comment in baseball media. Especially when you can point out exactly zero point where Sandoval was being lazy.

          And for all those going after me, unbelievable. Grow up. I’m not the one making these comments.

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          Nope, you are more of the problem than I am. Really weird how its always the non-white players coming under ridiculous scrutiny for things like “laziness” or “lacking hustle”, isn’t it?

          I won’t even touch that horrible “Fits the whole San Francisco area profile to a “T”. comment either. You need to quit using this angle. If you don’t like Sandoval then show video of him not hustling up the line or something. Saying “Because he’s fat” does NOT mean he’s lazy.

          Reply
        • TheMichigan

          9 years ago

          You want an answer to your “lazy” problem?

          Billy Butler is lazy, happy?

          Reply
        • 24TheKid

          9 years ago

          Wait another white player being called lazy????? This can’t be possible because now a days laziness is determined on race not personality acording to some people.

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          9 years ago

          It’s just Locker Room Talk. Isn’t that allowed now?

          Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          9 years ago

          You’re the one calling someone racist when their comment had ZERO to do with Pablo Sandoval’s race. None. Zilch. Nada.

          Yet, here you are, calling him a racist.

          His comment was dumb. But yours are equally deserving of criticism, perhaps more.

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          Again, being overweight does NOT EQUAL being lazy.

          Show instances or stop being…lazy…with your adjectives.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          Good call on Billy Butler. I knew there were some, but had a brain cramp.

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          To alot of people it takes work to diet correctly work Pablo has been afraid of his whole career. I call being afraid of work lazy. In a previous article his former dietitian stated he needs someone to follow him around everywhere and make all his meals like a child or else he will do this show up having eaten everything and it shows with pictures like the ones previouly shown on the cover of every newspaper in Boston.

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          Yup, and that’s what I’m talking about when I say “institutionalized racism” – the Boston baseball media is notorious for it (They got the fanbase to turn on NOMAR of all people!). Who even knows who that “former dietician” is and maybe why he’d slander him – no one knows the truth.

          But again, in the original post, it was never said implicitly “He’s lazy because he can’t stick to a diet”. It just said lazy, and I took that to mean on field performance, because THATS WHAT WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT.

          Reply
        • gmanfanatic07

          9 years ago

          If eating too much, being overweight, and showing up to play in far less than optimal playing shape is lazy then… David Wells, Babe Ruth, Bob Wickman Jon Broxton,Billy Butler, John Kruk,Rod Beck. No correlation between race and obesity in the MLB unless you go out of your way to make there be one. Wish this never got brought up. Stunted a good baseball conversation.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          He was lazy when he came into spring training overweight, even by his standards. He was lazy when he did it with the Giants. Multiple times.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          Thank you gmanfanatic.

          Reply
      • ATLHOE

        9 years ago

        say whaaaat? hahah

        Reply
      • Swen

        9 years ago

        Whoa buddy. I’m white, and I think Lackey is either lazy or selfish. He sat on the bench an entire season getting $15M, but threatened to retire rather than play for $500,000. And why praise panda for getting paid $20M to diet, most people diet for free.

        Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          Exactly.

          Reply
        • 24TheKid

          9 years ago

          Hmm, it looks to me that he just called a white player lazy, I thought you said white guys never get called lazy. And now that someone called a white player lazy are you going to stop making things about race like you said?

          Reply
        • teufelshunde4

          9 years ago

          But Lackey did pitch for that 500k. Nor did he conplain about it publicly and had a career year.

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          He told the red sox he wouldn’t that was part of the reason they traded him

          Reply
      • Sid Bream

        9 years ago

        @JustAnotherFan

        Fact check by Hillary Clinton’s ‘fact checker’.

        Can you name anywhere in the post where he talked about anyone being superior because of their race? Then you have proceeded to call him a “racist”. Goodness me, some people need a comprehension lesson in actually understanding what the word racist actually means. You need to ”GTFO” and go and take some English lessons. How you made this about racism says everything about the state of the world and political correctness, where people use words not knowing their actual meaning.

        Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          Ummm???
          “Can you name anywhere in the post where he talked about anyone being superior because of their race?”

          Sure?
          “Sandoval has always been lazy, where lackey was one of the fiercest competitors in the game.”

          Just take this L, Sid. I’m in the right here for calling this out, and everyone on this site should be doing this same on this outright BS.

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          9 years ago

          I still see absolutely no mention of race. I see two distinct individuals being compared. In your world, is this not allowed unless both individuals are of the same race? This is a Baseball site. Both are Baseball players. I doubt anyone but you was looking deeper.

          Reply
        • stl_cards16 2

          9 years ago

          How about the fact that he backs up John Lackey who is a well-documented POS, worthless excuse for a human. While doing that he bad mouths Sandoval, who by all accounts is a great person, just overweight.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          You can declare something racism because someone believes one specific black man is more lazy than one specific white man. He may be wrong, and that’s fine to argue about, but it’s not racist.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          *can’t

          Reply
      • bmoregmr

        9 years ago

        Ohhh lord.. let it go bro.. or should i not have said bro? My bad?

        Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          I don’t get it.

          Reply
      • sfgiants1

        9 years ago

        Sandoval is lazy. He went to Boston because the Giants wanted him to be under a certain weight. That is called being lazy. Stop being a puss.

        Reply
    • Jizz Chasholm

      9 years ago

      Wow that last part of that was so clever. Or not

      Reply
      • Jizz Chasholm

        9 years ago

        And saying porcello is tough because people don’t talk to him might be one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read. You fit the whole Boston dbag persona to a “T”

        Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      9 years ago

      Everything I’ve read suggests he works hard but has trouble controlling his eating.

      Also, it’s easier to discuss things when we don’t use labels. (This applies to everyone and everything.)

      Reply
    • AndyWarpath

      9 years ago

      Ummm, race aside: did you just say the San Francisco area profile is no self control? What’s your problem johnsilver?

      Reply
      • 24TheKid

        9 years ago

        Ok we really don’t need to get into this as there are arguments for both sides.

        Reply
    • davidcoonce74

      9 years ago

      Ugh, what does this “whole San Francisco are” dog-whistling mean? It sounds like gross homophobia. When did the MLBTR comments section get so out-of-hand?

      Reply
    • bigpapijuicer

      9 years ago

      Lol this is what happens when the three worst posters on this site (silver, JAF, jfisnasty) collide.

      Reply
      • Jizz Chasholm

        9 years ago

        Lol care to ellaborate

        Reply
      • Jizz Chasholm

        9 years ago

        With a name like that I know you’re just a troll

        Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          I respect JFisnasty

          Reply
      • aff10

        9 years ago

        Disagree on that one. Silver tends to rant about things that don’t really bother me, and JAF seems to find things for Oakland that I don’t really see, but there are people that bother me quite a bit more here than either of them. I tend to find JF’s commentary pretty on-point personally

        Reply
        • aff10

          9 years ago

          I’m much more bothered by the homer fans (every organization has them) that insist on recurring trade posts that only favor their team, despite other people repeatedly telling them that their proposals are ridiculously one-sided

          Reply
        • staypuft

          9 years ago

          JF is self important, JAF is a pretentious a hole, and silver is mildly autistic. Does that pretty much cover it?

          Reply
        • aff10

          9 years ago

          Eh, I don’t know anyone on here personally, so I don’t form opinions on their personalities. I go based on the validity of their baseball opinions, and there are worse people on here for sure

          Reply
        • JT19

          9 years ago

          By “homer fans that insist on recurring trade posts that only favor their team” I assume you mean all the crazy Braves/Red Sox fans? Lol. A lot of the Braves/Red Sox commentors here are actually intellectual and reasonable, but then there are some that definitely just tried a trade in a video game and it worked and they assume it’s applicable to real life.

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          I do too, and I don’t care that those people think I’m a bad poster, at all. If Jeff or the other mods think I’m out of line, they will let me know. Otherwise I’m going keep calling them like I see them, and I HATE racism in baseball media and homerism in fandom, so….deal with it? No one is forcing anyone to reply to anyone, everyone is free to 100% ignore what I post.

          Reply
        • 24TheKid

          9 years ago

          It’s hard for me to respect someone that non stop calls anyone he disagrees with either a racist or a loser.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          @staypuft yeah.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          I just don’t understand why stating an opinion on Sandoval is racist. If Sandoval was white we’d all have the same opinion. I don’t get the area profile remark, but pulling the racist card for remarks about Sandoval is ridiculous.

          Reply
        • 24TheKid

          9 years ago

          Exactly, why does everything now a days have to be assumed as the worst.

          Reply
        • aff10

          9 years ago

          Well, I did add the caveat that every organization has them, which I truly believe. Some of the Braves fans have been the most vocal recently, but I think it comes with the territory when a team is succeeding (or, in the Braves’ case, the rebuild appears to be working). I come from a family of Cubs fans, and find quite a few (although certainly not all) of the Cubs fans on these boards to be annoying homers as well

          Reply
        • Michael Macaulay-Birks

          9 years ago

          Manny Ramirez never hustled either….is that racist? You people are ridiculous

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          9 years ago

          Throwing in the “You people…” was a nice touch. LOL

          Reply
        • Michael Macaulay-Birks

          9 years ago

          “You People” in this chat room….don’t pull me into your racist crap, it has no business on a baseball site

          Reply
        • Michael Macaulay-Birks

          9 years ago

          I’ll be sure to use “fellow posters” in the future

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          “Connorsoxfan11 hours ago
          I just don’t understand why stating an opinion on Sandoval is racist. If Sandoval was white we’d all have the same opinion. I don’t get the area profile remark, but pulling the racist card for remarks about Sandoval is ridiculous.”

          How “ridiculous” is it to understand that every time you hear a baseball player being called lazy they are rarely, if ever, white?

          It’s not an opinion, its racism. That’s why people get SO hurt over it, because its institutionalized racism, racism from the baseball media that goes back decades that people never want to re-evaluate within themselves. It doesn’t occur to the person offhandedly slapping that “lazy” tag on almost-strictly non-white players, because they’ve seen it before so they think its ok. When it isn’t.

          Look, call Sandoval underperforming, say he has issues with his weight, but lazy? Unless you are prepared to back that up with instances of him not running out a grounder and getting pulled from the game (aka one of the only real times a player could be called lazy), then its institutionalized racism that NEEDS to be called out and taken down. Notice how we always hear about Mookie Betts athleticism and never his hustle? Betts hustles more than any player I’ve ever seen. But then we always hear about Pedroia’s hustle and never his athleticism? Pedroia is a marvelous athlete and literally won an MVP, yet he gets comped with “grinders” and “dirty uniform” types instead of HOFers like he should. That’s racism in baseball media and its been tolerated too long.

          “If he was white we’d say the same thing” – that’s a strawman and asinine comment, he isn’t, and that’s not what we are talking about here. It’s like Trump supporters still bringing up Hillary things when she didn’t even win the election – who cares about anything she does, we are talking about what he’s doing now. Please stay on point.

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          In Boston they call everyone lazy lackey becket or jd drew they call everyone lazy black white Spanish doesn’t matter everyone who’s not playing with broken bones isn’t hustling hard enough nothing to do with racism.

          Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          9 years ago

          “Look, call Sandoval underperforming, say he has issues with his weight, but lazy? Unless you are prepared to back that up with instances of him not running out a grounder and getting pulled from the game (aka one of the only real times a player could be called lazy), then its institutionalized racism that NEEDS to be called out and taken down.”

          You had me with the first half of this statement, then completely lost me with the second.

          Calling Pablo Sandoval “lazy” without any evidence is uncalled for. It’s unfair and might I even say, it’s a lazy argument.

          But to call this racism in any sense is a massive, I repeat MASSIVE stretch. And for someone who just called out others for using a fallacious argument, this one is ten times worse a fallacy. There is zero suggestion that he called Sandoval lazy because of his race (or that he wouldn’t use it if Sandoval were a different race), that is not only categorically false, it’s grossly unfair.

          But to call this racism is beyond trolling, it’s a desperate and feeble attempt to make someone look bad and bully people into submission.

          And let me add a small caveat/lecture: the reason we get no where regarding race discussions in this country is because of people like you, who prey online discussion boards waiting to strike with your nonsense. It only embitters people to the topic of race and when actually racism occurs, we note that you cried wolf too many times.

          I think 99% of the people here would agree that there was no display of racism whatsoever in that post, albeit a bad one. None.

          Reply
        • Michael Macaulay-Birks

          9 years ago

          Great post

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          @JAF how is “If he was white we’d say the same things” an asinine comment??? You can disagree with the things some people would say, but I hate that comment because it is the most succinct possible way to prove you wrong. If Pablo Sandoval was white, people still would have called him lazy. Which debunks what you say about it being a racist remark. You can’t take a black man and a white man being compared, and deem it racism because the person comparing said the white person was better in that one category. If I said that Ted Williams hit better than David Ortiz, am I a racist? No. I’m accurate.

          Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          9 years ago

          And if you knew anything about anything you would know that everyone in Boston raves about the hustle of Betts and Bradley. They rave about Papi, even though he had to walk down the first baseline for awhile. Baseball is not running rampant with racism.

          Reply
        • User 4245925809

          9 years ago

          Looks like both urself, Sandoval.. few others need to define a ‘safe space” and retreat to it for awhile and turn off all outside contact for awhile if that sensitive..

          This is ridiculous and has been on this topic for nearly an entire day the amount of self perceived racism many have implied.

          Reply
        • 24TheKid

          9 years ago

          That’s one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read on here @jaf, do you even know what racism is because I’m starting to think your still in middle school.

          Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      9 years ago

      “Fits the whole San Francisco area profile to a “T”.”

      Right. Which team was smart enough to have Sandoval on a weight regime? You’re right if you said SF. Conversely, which team was stupid enough to throw 5 years and $95m to a guy with weight issues without covering themselves the way the Giants did? If you said the Red Sox, and admitted they made the dumbest FA signing in the last 5 years, then once again you would be 100% correct. Good Job admitting your team’s GM had taffy for brains on that signing.

      Reply
      • User 4245925809

        9 years ago

        If remember correctly.. SF offered Sandoval the exact same dollars as did Cherrington when he was Boston’s GM. he wanted out at the time.

        maybe the memories of the strict dietary regimen?? Who knows.. Then, Those strict diets were not after he was set to be making close to 17m per year either.

        Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          9 years ago

          “maybe the memories of the strict dietary regimen?? Who knows.. ”

          Maybe? There is no doubt about that. Sandoval himself stated in an interview that had he re-signed with SF he would be on a weight regimen for the next five years. It didn’t say it specifically but he clearly found that distasteful. He also went on to say that he appreciated Boston’s approach in that they never mentioned weight, nor was there a weight clause in his contract.

          “Those strict diets were not after he was set to be making close to 17m per year either.”

          Well exactly, but they should have been. That was a huge error of omission by the Sox. No one can know for sure, but when a productive hitter moves to a more hitter friendly park but hits for 50 less points in OPS+ than he averaged over the previous 4 years, plus the physical evidence of his appearance in a Sox uni, you have to put some stock into the efficacy of forcing Sandoval to keep his weight under control.

          Reply
    • liamsfg

      9 years ago

      Don’t generalize people geographically. So far in this discussion I’ve witnessed exaggeration, manipulation of stats, reverse racism (victim card), and prejudice including, but not limited to, generalization of people geographically.

      Bottom line is, Sandoval had good moments in SF but those days are over. Nunez is consistent and can run (which the Giants lack),Panda has only bench value and isn’t worth much. The Giants could do better for less hassle.

      Reply
  10. Brixton

    9 years ago

    Sandoval for Matt Cain and Trey Ball.

    Giants get Sandoval at 3/30M and Trey Ball
    Red Sox get 30M salary relief and a wild card reliever

    Reply
    • largeunit

      9 years ago

      So in this scenario, the Red Sox would be receiving Matt Cain and a minor league pitcher that they already have in Trey Ball, correct? Genius.

      Reply
      • Brixton

        9 years ago

        That is what I typed, isn’t it. Um, How about Cain for Sandoval and Cain, rather. lol my bad, I didn’t catch that.

        Reply
        • largeunit

          9 years ago

          Don’t do it again.

          Reply
    • jakem59

      9 years ago

      This makes no sense what-so-ever for the Red Sox, especially considering Ball just posted his best season as a professional and is still only 22.

      Red Sox don’t need salary relief and Cain isn’t a “wild card reliever” he’s a broken down shell of his former self.

      Reply
      • highfivecity

        9 years ago

        Ball didn’t really improve, his BB:K ratio is still nearly even, he just got luckier this season. HIs future likely lies as an outfield prospect.

        Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          His K% increased, his walk% decreased, he posted his best homerun rate, his FIP started to even out, and he managed all this with a high BABIP. He was a very raw pitcher when drafted and he’s trending in the right direction and still very young. You don’t sacrifice 4 years of development and move the guy back to a position player after not swinging the bat in three year.

          Reply
      • Brixton

        9 years ago

        It makes no sense for the Red Sox to trade their number 15 or something like that prospect for 30M and a chance that Matt Cain can be somewhat useful?

        I’m pretty sure Joe Blanton was a broken down shell of his former self too, and he provided great results in a different role. Not gonna say it’s likely, but it does happen.

        Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          There is nothing that suggest Cain can be useful. You don’t trade a young pitcher for a garbage pitcher whose peripherals are awful and can’t stay healthy.

          Huge difference between Blanton and Cain. Blanton’s peripherals were still promising and he stayed relatively healthy save for 2013. Cain has lost his fastball, seen velocity drop across the board, and dealt with elbow and hamstring problems for the last three years. Cain best days are long behind him, in any capacity.

          Reply
    • gilgunderson

      9 years ago

      Matt Cain will earn $20 million next year. That’s not exactly salary relief from anyone’s point of view, except that that’s the final year of his contract, save for a team option that will never get picked up.

      Reply
  11. rivera42

    9 years ago

    You’ve got to be kidding me! Don’t tell me the Sox get bailed out again.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      9 years ago

      Keep in mind, it’s Dombrowski you’re talking about. He’ll probably get talked into giving away some stud just so they can get rid of Pablo.

      Reply
      • rivera42

        9 years ago

        Well, I mean, if Boston wants to get rid of Panda to the point of parting with Benintendi, I certainly won’t have any complaints.

        Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          9 years ago

          Haha, me neither.

          Reply
        • deadtom

          9 years ago

          Dombrowski isn’t an idiot… He’s not going to throw in any of the B’s (Betts, Bradley jr, Bogaerts or Benintendi.

          This is not going to happen anyways, Pablo has to build his trade value back up and with Papi riding off into the sunset we have a spot for Pablo even if it is DH. We won’t need him but if he can return to form then we can get someone worth while without throwing in someone who could and may well wind up being a regular all star.

          Ohhh… and dont even think about asking for Groome, he wasn’t mentioned but it fits the Giants m.o. in regards to pitchers

          Reply
      • stymeedone

        9 years ago

        Yeah, when he salary dumped in Detroit, all he got for Fielder was Ian Kinsler. What an idiot.

        Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          That wasn’t a salary dump, they sent money to Texas match salaries.

          Reply
    • jakem59

      9 years ago

      How have the Red Sox been “Bailed Out”? They had to part with Adrian Gonzalez to make the Dodgers take those salaries and received Loneys contract, organizational depth prospects, a guy who was struggling to recover from Tommy John Surgery and Webster, who was a young flier prospect in return.

      Reply
  12. The_Thrill_22

    9 years ago

    Nooo

    Reply
  13. Goose

    9 years ago

    Did Magic Johnson purchase the Giants?

    Reply
    • rivera42

      9 years ago

      Lol, good question.

      Reply
  14. houseoflords44

    9 years ago

    The Giants would be better served using Nunez & Gillaspie at third and then spending their money on bigger areas of need like a closer & a left fielder

    Reply
    • Rounding3rd

      9 years ago

      I agree. The Giants have bigger needs than constructing a Panda deal. Focus on the bullpen and LF.

      Reply
  15. NineChampionsips

    9 years ago

    Remember when the angels traded for Vernon Wells. Red Sox GM should call up the angels owner to talk Panda. You could probably get the angels to eat the whole salary and throw in a couple young players too haha.

    Reply
  16. norcalblue

    9 years ago

    I cannot believe Giants would be that stupid. They were incredibly fortunate that the guy took less money from Boston two years ago and they saved themselves millions of dollars.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      9 years ago

      If the Red Sox take on a majority of his contract, or send a better player back with Sandoval’s massive contract (to take a play out of the Dodgers playbook), it’s not a bad deal. Giants seem to know how to get the most out of Pablo.

      Then again, until I see it confirmed by one of the Giants beat writers, I would pretty much call it pure speculation and maybe even wishful thinking from Drellich.

      Reply
  17. Tommet

    9 years ago

    Confused as to why Nunez can’t be an everyday option at 3rd. Crawford is obviously at SS. Panik had an off 2016 but he can still be put at 2nd. With Gillaspie backing up, Nunez should absolutely be the everyday 3B.

    Reply
    • The Oregonian

      9 years ago

      I don’t get the hate for Nunez either. He’s a perfectly serviceable 3B who brings speed to the lineup the Giants don’t have otherwise. A fine bridge to when Arroyo will be ready to replace him. Besides, I thought Panda burned his bridges here on the way out… I’ll always be a Giants fan, but if he returns I won’t be going out to the ballpark.

      Reply
    • jakem59

      9 years ago

      Because Nunez and Gillaspie provide little offensively and even less defensively. Both had pretty big outlier seasons last year, you can’t expect that kind of production again. You have to bring in competition.

      Reply
  18. terry g

    9 years ago

    A eating problem is NOT a being lazy problem and labels don’t answer the question of whether this would be good for S.F , Bos. or Sandoval.

    Reply
    • darkstar61

      9 years ago

      Hahaha, yeah don’t dare call a 30yo elete professional athlete “lazy” when his weight balloons to the point he can barely play the game anymore… he’s just big-boned or something I guess :-/

      Reply
  19. dazedatnoon

    9 years ago

    If the Giants are interested in trading for 3B help, why wouldn’t they pursue Frazier. Seems like a more logical fit. Better offensive and defensive player already, which could possibly even improve with a return to the NL.

    Reply
    • gmenfan

      9 years ago

      They will. This panda thing would go nowhere.

      Reply
    • jakem59

      9 years ago

      They lack the prospects to go after someone as productive as Frazier

      Reply
      • Nick4747

        9 years ago

        Todd Frazier had a terrible year I can’t see him getting that huge of an asking price. I know he hit 40 bombs but low obp and batting average high strikeouts if trumbo 2015 was worth a backup catcher who was later released he’s probably only worth slightly more @ this point unless I’m missing something.

        Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          For a depleted farm system like San Francisco’s, it would be too much. Bickford, Beede, or Fox would probably have to be in that deal. Frazier is head and shoulders better than Trumbo in almost every category, especially in defense and base running. Even with Frazier having a down year he was still worth a 3.4WAR more than double what Trumbo managed in 2015.

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          Like I said that was defense related. Not having a position destroys your war when you have a low obp high strikeout rate. Personally I believe he’s more of an add on piece to an abreu or sale deal to get a team to give up that one piece they otherwise wouldn’t.

          Reply
        • gmanfanatic07

          9 years ago

          Bickford was included in the Will Smith deal and Fox was included in the Matt Moore deal. They have less trade chips than you think.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          9 years ago

          You beat me to it about Bickford and Fox, but they still have some decent prospects. Other than Arroyo they’re all pitchers. But the Giants were forced to lose Joe Biagini to the Jays in the Rule 5 draft because they couldn’t protect all of their pitching prospects on the 40 man last year.

          Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          Completely forgot about those trades. My bad.

          Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          Sorry, positional defense doesn’t play that heavily into WAR that it would half it. I mean, Brock Holt played almost every position on the diamond in 2015 at roughly replacement level, and still managed to out WAR Trumbo this year, by a wide margin. Ben Zoberist, the guy who literally plays anywhere they let him at league average defense (and recently worse than) has never posted a WAR as low as Trumbos this year.

          His value is enough where he can be traded on his own and net a decent return near to what the sox gave up for him. Heck, with his contract now controlled by arbitration that might not even be something you can say about Abreau.

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          Trumbos defense hurts his value if defense doesn’t hurt war why does the 2015 David Ortiz with a slash line of 273 360 553 and a 913 ops all told puts a war total of 3.2 for war while 2016 Frazier had a slash line of 225 302 464 with a 767 ops his war of 3.4. His value is in his position. Trumbo lacks a true position which hurts his value. If Frazier gets a decent haul it has more to do with the other options at the defensive position Frazier plays than his bat.

          Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          I didn’t say defense doesn’t affect WAR, I said it doesn’t effect it as heavily as you are making it out to, and brining David Ortiz’s defense into this makes no sense as it has no barring on his WAR numbers as a DH.

          Trumbo has a position where he has logged substantial innings, RF, he’s just bad at it. Even with him having a “break out” year he’s still only slightly above average player to deploy.

          Todd Frazier is one of the better 3B in the league even following a down year, Trumbo is not one of the better OF’s in the league. Saying they would cost the same in a trade is like saying Chris Young is worth the same as Evan Longoria because they have nearly identical slash lines.

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          I brought up David Ortiz s stat line to show how much better you have to hit when you don’t have a position which dh is probably just as bad as playing terrible in the 96 games he played in the outfield if not worse depending on how bad he was. Again any value Frazier has is the fact that he’s a third baseman. And really better third baseman in the league i like ops it gives a good look @ everything and according to ops he’s 15 th depending on if you would qualify Valencia and just ahead of Eduardo Nunez and yunel Escobar.
          Again I said slightly more because he has a position never said the same. The yunel Escobar trade for instance I had as slightly more than the trumbo trade fwiw a middle reliever and 29 year old minor leaguer.

          Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          Trumbo is a Rightfielder, he has a postion. Just because he’s a poor defender doesn’t mean he doesn’t play a position. He logged roughly the same DH/On-Field splits as Mike Napoli yet no one calls him a man with no position. They call him a Firstbaseman.

          DH is a position though, part of the WAR calculation is based on the position you qualify at so saying Ortiz WAR was only 3.2 because he has no position and is poor defensively makes no sense, defense plays nothing into his WAR. It’s not like Todd Frazier is a wizard with the glove either, he slightly above league average.

          Grading how good of an overall player someone is based on OPS is terribly ineffective. It factors nothing in like Nunez or Valencia’s high BABIPs, Nunez’s very low walk rate, or how ungodly bad Valencia is with a glove at 3B.

          Yunel Escobar compiled a whopping 1.6 war, worse than Trumbos. Grading a trade on what the Angels gave up to acquire someone isn’t the best place to start anyways.

          Saying Frazier only garners value because he’s a third baseman is just an ignorant statement. If a team needs a 3B their not going to go after Trumbo because “their the same player”. Is Lucroy only good because he’s a catcher?

          Reply
        • Nick4747

          9 years ago

          Actually that’s what makes alot of guys have more value is just the position they play and lack good hitters @ the position. Lucroy wouldn’t have as much value if he was a first baseman or dh. It’s also how war is calculated the position they play and when you play a position negatively it also detracts your overall war. If you play slightly above league average defense Frazier vs below average like trumbo it’s the difference in probably 2 war. Before even calculating offense trumbo is already in the negatives while Frazier is positive one we’ll say. And then yes war calculates the position in which they play trumbo played 59 games as a dh Frazier played third base. As far as not being the same you’re kind of right kind of wrong they change year to year based on what’s available. But Escobar as much as you might think differently has more value last year then then Frazier this year he had an option and they weren’t that much different in terms of offensive numbers outside of home runs. Ops isn’t a perfect stat just as batting average or something like that, there really isn’t a perfect stat but as we’re discussing with war there is no perfect stat it’s all a personal preference. To me ops is good for multiple years babip has a way of showing the year to year anomalies that take place but if a guy has a constant ops it’s generally a good indicator in how they hit.

          Reply
  20. mrnatewalter

    9 years ago

    Drellich’s article seemed borne out of wishful thinking than it was based out of “good chance”.

    I’m sure the Giants, much like every team, leave no stone unturned for their needs. They are looking at 3B options, certainly they’d at least consider Pablo, even if for just to see what it would cost. I bet they’ve “considered” every 3B option in the game.

    Drellich is probably seeking stories and needs to write, so this is what came up.

    Reply
  21. Soxman81

    9 years ago

    Please please please make this happen Red Sox brass. Eat 75% of the contract and call it a day. Sandoval is a bum.

    Reply
  22. JKurk22

    9 years ago

    I hope the Giants take him back and he sucks even worse and they’re stuck with his contract and the Red Sox get to laugh about it.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      9 years ago

      If the Red Sox get the Giants to take Sandoval, it’ll be with one of two likely scenarios:

      1. The Red Sox pay a majority of Pablo’s contract

      OR

      2. The Giants pay all of his salary and the Red Sox package Sandoval with a significantly better player.

      Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      9 years ago

      And you’re probably also hoping the Red Sox fairy godmother shows up and sprinkles the team with magic powder, and everyone on the team has career years. Sounds to me like you’re having a hard time dealing with the fact that your team made the blunder; it’s your team sunk with the under-performing, over-paid player, and you’re hoping beyond hope that some team will alleviate that burden for free. Don’t bet on it working out as you hope.

      Reply
      • Nick4747

        9 years ago

        Although it was brought up by a Boston fan after a Boston media outlet reported it there’s probably some truth to it being a discussion probably goes to show San Francisco isn’t happy with their third base options either. Personally I wouldn’t give him away unless its a huge salary relief and in the end i don’t think dd will either nor will another team want to take that risk.End of the day he comes to camp with the red sox. Sadly

        Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          9 years ago

          Thanks for the more realistic POV from a Sox fan. I completely agree. I don’t doubt they they discussed it, but all sorts of deals are discussed that never come to fruition. I don’t think the Giants aren’t happy with Nunez backed up by Gillaspie, but they may see an in-shape Sandoval as an upgrade.

          I also don’t see it happening without Boston picking up some of the salary, but also not without SF getting Sandoval to sign off on accepting a weight regimen. A lot would need to happen for this deal. But he’s supposedly in good shape now, so if he remains in Boston he might surprise you..

          Reply
    • gmenfan

      9 years ago

      You don’t get how this trade would go down, do you ?

      Reply
  23. chaz

    9 years ago

    For the love of God, keep him in Boston – New England Restaurant Association.

    Reply
    • badco44

      9 years ago

      Haha… a lot of blame to go around on Panda, but most of its on him. No self pride, and how do you possible pick up a pay check in that kind of condition. Maybe some conditions for employment should have been in this contract .. standard wise

      Reply
  24. mike156

    9 years ago

    If this is real, I’ll be expecting Cafardo to show up this weekend with some nonsense about how Pablo looks better than he has in years, and how the Red Sox FO wouldn’t think of parting with him unless they were overwhelmed.

    Reply
    • Connorsoxfan

      9 years ago

      Cafardo is an idiot.

      Reply
    • jakem59

      9 years ago

      Cafardo is an idiot, but Sandoval is actually in the best shape of his playing career right now.

      Reply
      • Connorsoxfan

        9 years ago

        I don’t think it’s worth it to dump him yet, as there is some hope he can give something as a DH. Let’s see how the first bit of spring training goes first.

        Reply
        • jakem59

          9 years ago

          I’d give him every opportunity to play the field. Between Shaw/Ramirez/Pablo/Holt you could have a rotation between 1B, 3B, and DH.

          It’ll be interesting to see how he plays when he’s as in shape as he is now. You see some guys struggle with mechanics after altering their body like that.

          Reply
  25. bmore12

    9 years ago

    Giants should agree to pay more than $3-4 M in his deal.

    Reply
  26. Pedro Cerrano's Voodoo

    9 years ago

    Yay! Can’t believe the Giants would think of this but would be stoked to see him go. I just remember every fan laughing when the Sox signed him.

    Reply
  27. oldleftylong

    9 years ago

    Frisco should focus on JD Martinez. Learned from Miggy how to drive it out of the park to right. He’ll hit 50 homers for the Giants. But, they’ll need to give up one of the few good prospects they have.

    Reply
    • stymeedone

      9 years ago

      only one?

      Reply
    • gilgunderson

      9 years ago

      How many RH hitters have you seen clear the wall in right at AT&T Park? Pretty short list. Only guys who could do that would be prime McGwire or Piazza. Even most LH hitters adopt an opposite field approach — Crawford and Belt hit a lot of balls out the opposite way.

      JD could be a good fit for the Giants, but his power numbers will definitely decline at AT&T.

      Reply
  28. bernbabybern

    9 years ago

    Didn’t Panda say some bad things about SF when he left?

    Reply
    • gmenfan

      9 years ago

      Yes.

      Reply
    • gilgunderson

      9 years ago

      Yes. He burned his bridges convincingly enough.

      Reply
  29. Deke

    9 years ago

    I cannot believe any NL club would give up anything for Sandoval and/or be stuck with any significant portion of his salary. I am NOT a Sandoval fan and was glad to see him leave SF but I also believe that ne could be of value to an American League club that can put him at DH because despite him being able to trim down from time to time, he puts the weight back on.

    On top of that, there’s a chemistry issue with SF, Sandoval left the team on bad terms, didn’t respond to ex teammates calls or texts and slammed the organization as he was leaving.

    Sandoval also said that he didn’t sign with SF because he knew he would be on a weight regime so who is to say he’s going to adhere to any regime? He could flat out refuse and SF would have no choice but to release him and eat whatever they were on the hook for.

    Reply
  30. HaloShane

    9 years ago

    Hey, that’s okay. You should read these Angel post. Angel fan wants every FA or traded player back. It’s rather comical.

    Reply
  31. Phillies2017

    9 years ago

    Sandoval goes nowhere unless he’s free or a legit prospect is attached. Not like Benintendi but like Ockimey or Basabe or Brian Johnson.
    He has negative value at this point on both sides of the ball and while a change in scenery could certainly help him, a GM would have to be stupid to give up anything of even marginal value for him.

    Reply
  32. tattooed trash

    9 years ago

    NO, do I need to say more?

    Reply
  33. AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

    9 years ago

    At least this would put an end to the Sandoval to San Diego rumors

    Reply
  34. dstuart

    9 years ago

    We’ll gladly take Pablo and his contract for Andrew Benintendi please and thank you.

    Reply
  35. bobtillman

    9 years ago

    Whatever his skin color or sexual orientation, Panda has negative trade value.

    My own thought is that he’s headed to Detroit as part of an offset for Verlander and/or Miggy.

    And BTW, Benentindi isn’t going anywhere.

    Reply
    • stymeedone

      9 years ago

      Detroit has stated they are trying to get younger and faster. Panda is neither. With Castellanos already at 3B, there is no fit.

      Reply
  36. matthewalan09

    9 years ago

    JD Martinez going to hit 50 at AT&T? Unless he’s suddenly juicing there is no way. Att is pretty pitchers friendly. Dimensions, wind, etc.

    Reply
    • Michael Macaulay-Birks

      9 years ago

      He definitely doesn’t hit 50, but would provide a serious upgrade to the giants outfield

      Reply
      • Michael Macaulay-Birks

        9 years ago

        Makes way more sense than Sandoval

        Reply
        • slider32

          9 years ago

          Gardner seems to be the fit for the Giants in the outfield, he’s a solid veteran who plays hard and can lead off.

          Reply
      • Michael Macaulay-Birks

        9 years ago

        JD Mart>>>> Morse

        Reply
        • gilgunderson

          9 years ago

          Morse >>>> JD for Game 5 of the 2014 NLCS and Game 7 of the 2014 World Series alone. Legend forever.

          Reply
  37. sb3champs

    9 years ago

    4 months and 5 days too early for this post. You blew your chance at a Syd Finch type story.

    Reply
    • Rounding3rd

      9 years ago

      My favorite Mets pitcher!

      Reply
  38. padreforlife

    9 years ago

    San Diego lol

    Reply
  39. padreforlife

    9 years ago

    Padre fans too busy hoping Bud Black fails and celebrating $ they think saved by trading Shields, Kemp etc, little do they know they are still on hook for 80 mil

    Reply
    • jmi1950

      9 years ago

      Padre’s #1 problem is no one will ever trust them after they kept two sets of medical records and flat out lied to the Marlins and Red Sox.

      Reply
  40. baseballsavvy

    9 years ago

    If you ever watch Discovery you would know that Pandas have to constantly eat all day to get enough nutrition. The problem is, this Panda has moved on to more tastier food. He is definitely not eating his bamboo shoots anymore……

    Reply
  41. matthewalan09

    9 years ago

    Guys. This thread is giving me a headache. Cant we all get along? If you dont like a player thats fine. No need to insult one another. Plus. How many games have YOU played at 3rd for the Giants? How many world series rings do you have? Pretty sure panda has 3.

    Sandoval literally carried that team when they swept Detroit. And Sandoval hit 3 home runs in game 2. 2 off Verlander.

    And how many times do players sign fat contracts (pun intended) and regress a little. Pablo is a competitor and will be just fine.

    And if not? OH WELL. BLAME YOUR GM NOT THE PLAYER. Its not like it wasnt well documented that he has nutrition problems.

    Grow up guys. Jesus.

    Reply
    • gilgunderson

      9 years ago

      And he would have been MVP of the 2014 World Series if not for Bumgarner.

      He did take the entire 2010 postseason off, however. I only remember one key hit against the Phillies, otherwise he sat on the bench.

      Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      9 years ago

      You’re right about some things; insults are stupid, and Sandoval was awesome as the MVP of the 2102 WS, but he hit only 2 HRs off Verlander, the 3rd one was off Alburquerque.

      Reply
  42. HubcapDiamondStarHalo

    9 years ago

    Note to the Giants: Do it! With holiday regards from a Red Sox fan…

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      9 years ago

      And in this great baseball gift exchange, Pablo Sandoval will be wrapped with a very nice prospect or an entirely free contract going back to San Francisco.

      Thanks Boston!

      Reply
  43. RiverCatsFilms

    9 years ago

    If the Giants get him, would Nunez play left? Or would they continue to peruse Cespedes or someone else

    Reply
  44. jmi1950

    9 years ago

    Drellich & Cafardo spent last year predicting Hanley & Porcello would be dumped with the Sox eating $$$$. The Sox will not give away a top prospect to get someone to take Panda. They will give him one more year to get right. In 2015 he went 2 for 40 from the right side before giving up switch hitting; most likely his left shoulder was already injured. After Hanley & Porcello’s 2016 comebacks it is not unreasonable to hope Panda can do the same. Good teams do not sell low on veterans. The main reason DD is hoping Panda has a good 2017 so that he can trade him is the wealth of talent in the system . If Dubon becomes the SS Boegy can move to 3B or Moncada, Devers and Chaivez could be in the 3B/1B/DH mix.

    Reply
  45. angie

    9 years ago

    we want the Panda bear back……

    Reply
  46. angie

    9 years ago

    from Joe, give us Pablo please

    Reply
  47. kyredsox17

    9 years ago

    Personally, IMO, I think BOS should wait and see at this point unless you get a half way decent deal. 3B/DH is pretty open, and his value can’t dip any lower. If SF thinks they have the right environment for him today then they will think the same a month into the season. His contract isn’t looking as bad as it did at the end of the 1st year or the start of the 2nd. But sure, take him.

    Reply
  48. mike156

    9 years ago

    Sounds like Drellich was doing a little stirring of the pot. On whose behalf, and on whose behest remains to be seen. But I kind of doubt a member of the Giant FO would open up to a Boston writer so as to drive up the price..

    Reply
  49. fmfish12

    9 years ago

    Is there just a thing about San Francisco and Boston teams and misrepresented trade rumors? First it was Klay Thompson to the Celtics, now this? Let all analysts take this as a lesson to not publish something until they’ve had some confirmation from an internal source.

    Reply
  50. pseudostats

    9 years ago

    Sounds like a potential trade that could be polled by mlbtraderumors, maybe two polls, one for Giants fans, one for Red Sox fans as the results might be more interesting than a single poll.

    Reply
  51. darkstar61

    9 years ago

    “I’m a professional and I know what I have to do,” said Sandoval, listed as 5-11 and 255. “I know where I’ve failed and how I’ve grown up. If I had signed (with the Giants), I knew I would be under a (weight) regimen for five years, and I’m not going to be happy someplace where I’m under that kind of regimen, where I can’t be myself.”

    …yeah, uhm, this update is hardly a surprise. I mean, why would the Giants ever want the guy back when he whined and cried and played childish phone games because SanFran did things to keep him in playing shape – he specifically didn’t sign with them because he doesn’t want to be put on a program which keeps him in playing shape!

    Like he says, he is a professional and knows what he needs to do – he just doesn’t want to do it, and he now doesn’t need to in order to collect his huge paycheck anyway so…

    Reply
  52. g55s

    9 years ago

    LOL at anyone who thought it would happen.

    Reply
  53. claude raymond

    9 years ago

    SF front office has gotta be laughing their arses off over this story. Foolish to even give my comment to waste my time.

    Reply
  54. claude raymond

    9 years ago

    Writer Todd’s middle name is Wee

    Reply
  55. Michael Macaulay-Birks

    9 years ago

    95 million was an overpay for him regardless of all of the things that have been said in this thread, regardless of the color of his skin, the size of his waist line or the seriousness of his shoulder injury

    Reply
    • rocky7

      9 years ago

      I agree Michael Macaulay-Birks, it was a bad contract from start to ?
      And, oh my gosh the Yankees aren’t tied to this one…..the sky is falling!

      Just another example of an overpay for in this case not even average performance..
      Let’s not let the team responsible for this one off the hook again!

      Reply
    • Francisco

      9 years ago

      Don’t believe anything Drelich reports he is so full of crap.

      Reply
  56. ctguy

    9 years ago

    If the Giants are smart they stay as far away from Sandoval as possible. A bad contract along with bad weight issues. If he can come back then the Red Sox will be able to use him. If not then they will be feeding home for a few more years.

    Reply
  57. glenn314

    9 years ago

    If the Giants are serious about contending in the odd year, Pablo is NOT the answer. He’s a has been.. Constantly dealing with weight issues and now the shoulder. Why would you want to get involved in any part of a 95 million dollar contract and add another headache to the team. The Giants priorities should be middle relievers a strong closer and a player that can hit 30 home runs. The Giants bats are flat. Don’t rely on Posey to do it all.

    LEAVE THE PANDA RIGHT IN BEAN TOWN!!!!

    Reply
  58. Deke

    9 years ago

    I’ve confirmed how this story came out… Drellich has a buddy who knows a stripper who lives in SF. That strippers hairdresser’s has a friend of a friend whose uncle works at AT&T as a groundskeeper. The groundskeepers dog overheard someone in the front office mention the food budget was going to be increased and assumed that it meant Pablo was coming back.

    I’ve conducted a very exhaustive investigation and concluded that the groundskeepers dog is hard of hearing and that Drellich’s sources are clearly just making crap up….

    Reply
    • Connorsoxfan

      9 years ago

      Haha

      Reply
    • mike156

      9 years ago

      Makes total sense. Hungry dog said “rrr-rrr” and people heard that as “Panda”
      Nice investigative work–maybe there’s a place for you at MLBTR?

      Reply
  59. pickandersen

    9 years ago

    DEVELOPING: Giants would trade Lincecum and Bumgarner, PTBNL for Panda, Benintendi, Moncada, cash.

    Reply
    • pickandersen

      9 years ago

      Oh boy. Go ahead bring the hate.
      I realize that
      1. It’s not developing, it’s a suggestion
      2. Lincecum is a FA. I meant Samardzja.

      My apologies. Very sorry for the mistake.

      Reply
  60. lucero5000

    9 years ago

    “Oh please, please, please let the giants trade for the panda!!”, said the dodgers fan.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version